Article

Impact of Tumor Grade on Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Include Grade in AJCC Staging?

John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.93). 09/2010; 17(9):2312-20. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1071-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

AJCC staging of pancreatic cancer (PAC) is used to determine prognosis, yet survival within each stage shows wide variation and remains unpredictable. We hypothesized that tumor grade might be responsible for some of this variation and that the addition of grade to current AJCC staging would provide improved prognostication.
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1991-2005) was used to identify 8082 patients with resected PAC. The impact of grade on overall and stage-specific survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Variables in the model were age, sex, tumor size, lymph node status, and tumor grade.
For each AJCC stage, survival was significantly worse for high-grade versus low-grade tumors. On multivariate analysis, high tumor grade was an independent predictor of survival for the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.31-1.48) as well as for stage I (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54), stage IIA (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.26-1.61), stage IIB (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27-1.50), stage III (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.59), and stage IV (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.05) patients. The addition of grade to staging results in a statistically significant survival discrimination between all stages.
Tumor grade is an important prognostic variable of survival in PAC. We propose a novel staging system incorporating grade into current AJCC staging for pancreas cancer. The improved prognostication is more reflective of tumor biology and may impact therapy decisions and stratification of future clinical trials.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nabil Wasif, Oct 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of these datasets revealed TNM stage as a poor prognostic factor (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.94, P = 0.667) (Additional file 7:Figure S5 ), whereas tumour grade was a strong predictor of patient outcome (HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.88, P = 3.18 × 10 −5 ) (Additional file 8:Figure S6). These findings are in line with previously published pancreatic cancer studies suggesting the strong prognostic value of tumour grade and highly variable patient survival within TNM stage groups [28,29] To understand the PDAC subtype-specific transcriptional activity, we asked whether these 36 genes are differentially expressed between the two PDAC subtypes. To avoid training-specific bias, we limited our analysis to the validation datasets only (n = 393). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improved usage of the repertoires of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) profiles is crucially needed to guide the development of predictive and prognostic tools that could inform the selection of treatment options. Using publicly available mRNA abundance datasets, we performed a large retrospective meta-analysis on 466 PDAC patients to discover prognostic gene signatures. These signatures were trained on two clinical cohorts (n = 70), and validated on four independent clinical cohorts (n = 246). Further validation of the identified gene signature was performed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. We identified 225 candidate prognostic genes. Using these, a 36-gene signature was discovered and validated on fully independent clinical cohorts (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.51 to 2.81, P = 3.62 × 10(-6), n = 246). This signature serves as a good alternative prognostic stratification marker compared to tumour grade (HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.88, P = 3.18 × 10(-5)) and tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.94, P = 0.67). Upon multivariate analysis with adjustment for TNM stage and tumour grade, the 36-gene signature remained an independent prognostic predictor of clinical outcome (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.16, P = 0.01). Univariate assessment revealed higher expression of ITGA5, SEMA3A, KIF4A, IL20RB, SLC20A1, CDC45, PXN, SSX3 and TMEM26 was correlated with shorter survival while B3GNT1, NOSTRIN and CADPS down-regulation was associated with poor outcome. Our 36-gene classifier is able to prognosticate PDAC independent of patient cohort and microarray platforms. Further work on the functional roles, downstream events and interactions of the signature genes is likely to reveal true molecular candidates for PDAC therapeutics.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · Genome Medicine
    • "A recent study has shown a different prognosis of resectable tumors depending on the degree of differentiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Authors even preclude surgery in some cases with poorly differentiated carcinomas.[77] Moreover now-a-days, with latest advances is possible to obtain real cores from pancreatic tumors and establish the degree of differentiation of pancreatic tumors.[4244] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved to become a crucial tool for the evaluation of pancreatic diseases, among them solid pancreatic lesions. However, its ability to determine whether a lesion is malignant or not is difficult to establish based only in the endosonographic image. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows obtaining a cytological and/or histological sample from pancreatic lesions, with a high overall accuracy and low complication rates. Although the clinical usefulness of EUS-FNA for pancreatic diseases is widely accepted, the indications for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions suspected to be malignant is still controversial. This review highlights the diagnostic accuracy and complications of EUS-FNA, focusing on its current indications.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/aims: It is very important to determine the prognostic factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma when choosing surgical and conservative management strategies. In this study, we identified prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methodology: Between January 2003 and December 2009, 82 patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were considered for this study. Follow-up consisted of personal contact with patients or review of electronic medical records at this center and was terminated on December 31, 2011 or upon the patient's death. Results: Overall survival rates of all patients at 1, 3, and 5 years were 51.9, 21.6 and 16.0%. Preoperative jaundice was the only independent prognostic factor for total pancreatic cancer patients, while N stage and perineural invasion in pathological findings was identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival of patients with surgical resection. Chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor for survival of patients who underwent palliative surgical bypass. Conclusions: Preoperative jaundice in any patients, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion in patients with surgical resection, and chemotherapy in patients undergoing palliative surgical bypass are important prognostic factors for survival of pancreatic cancer.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2013 · Hepato-gastroenterology
Show more