The CRF domain defines Cytokinin Response Factor proteins in plants

Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5407, USA.
BMC Plant Biology (Impact Factor: 3.81). 04/2010; 10(1):74. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-74
Source: PubMed


Cytokinin Response Factors (CRFs) are a small subset of AP2/ERF transcription factor genes shown in Arabidopsis to regulate leaf development as part of the cytokinin signal transduction pathway. This study examines the phylogenetic distribution of CRF genes in other plant species, and attempts to identify the extent of sequence conservation and potential gene function among all CRF genes.
We identified CRF genes in representatives of all major land plant lineages, including numerous flowering plant taxa in addition to the model systems in which ERF genes have been catalogued. Comparative analysis across this broader sampling has identified strongly conserved amino acid motifs other than the AP2/ERF domain for all CRF proteins as well as signature sequences unique to specific clades of CRF genes. One of these motifs, here designated as the CRF domain, is conserved in and unique to CRF proteins distinguishing them from related genes. We show that this novel domain of approximately 65 amino acids is found in CRF proteins from all groups of land plants and only in CRF genes. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the evolution of CRF genes has included numerous duplication events. In this phylogenetic context we examine protein evolution including the gain and loss of accessory domains, correlate these molecular evolutionary events with experimental data on cytokinin regulation and speculate on the function and evolution of the CRF domain within AP2/ERF transcription factor proteins. We also tested a prediction drawn from the phylogenetic analyses that four CRF domain containing genes from Tomato, previously unexamined for cytokinin response, are transcriptionally inducible by cytokinin, supporting the link between CRF genes, CRF-specific domains and cytokinin regulation.
CRF genes can be identified in all lineages of land plants, as a distinct subset of AP2/ERF proteins containing a specific and unique CRF domain. The CRF domain can be used to identify previously unclassified predicted genes or genes identified only as members of the AP2/ERF protein family. CRF domain presence and phylogenetic relatedness to known Arabidopsis CRF genes predicts gene function to some extent.

Download full-text


Available from: Aaron Rashotte, Jul 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "More elaborative motif distribution in each of the five legumes is listed in Table 2. CRF-specific N-terminus[ATDxSS]domain was found in four legumes except Medicago. However, the TEH motif at the start of N-terminus was missing, which is in accordance with earlier findings (Rashotte and Goertzen, 2010;Zwack et al., 2012). The ERF associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif known to repress the transcription (Ohta et al., 2001), like DEAR1, a DREB sequence containing EAR motif mediates crosstalk between signalling pathways for stress responses (Tsutsui et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: APETALA2/ethylene response factor (AP2/ERF) and heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) are two significant classes of transcription factor and molecular chaperone proteins which are known to be implicated under abiotic and biotic stresses. Comprehensive survey identified a total of 147 AP2/ERF genes in chickpea, 176 in pigeonpea, 131 in Medicago, 179 in common bean and 140 in Lotus, whereas the number of HSP90 genes ranged from 5 to 7 in five legumes. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses distinguished AP2, ERF, DREB, RAV and soloist proteins, while HSP90 proteins segregated on the basis of their cellular localization. Deeper insights into the gene structure allowed ERF proteins to be classified into AP2s based on DNA-binding domains, intron arrangements and phylogenetic grouping. RNA-seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses in heat-stressed chickpea as well as Fusarium wilt (FW)- and sterility mosaic disease (SMD)-stressed pigeonpea provided insights into the modus operandi of AP2/ERF and HSP90 genes. This study identified potential candidate genes in response to heat stress in chickpea while for FW and SMD stresses in pigeonpea. For instance, two DREB genes (Ca_02170 and Ca_16631) and three HSP90 genes (Ca_23016, Ca_09743 and Ca_25602) in chickpea can be targeted as potential candidate genes. Similarly, in pigeonpea, a HSP90 gene, C.cajan_27949, was highly responsive to SMD in the resistant genotype ICPL 20096, can be recommended for further functional validation. Also, two DREB genes, C.cajan_41905 and C.cajan_41951, were identified as leads for further investigation in response to FW stress in pigeonpea.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Plant Biotechnology Journal
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, gradual reduction of expression of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) HD-Zip gene (GhHB1) with development of roots and its induction in response to abscisic acid and salt (Ni et al., 2008) indicated that HD-Zip genes play important roles in both morphogenic processes as well as stress responses of plants. The sweetpotato gene IbCRF1 that showed the second highest increase in expression (fold change of 6) under drought stress is similar to AP2/EREBP genes (Riechmann and Meyerowitz, 1998) and cytokinin response genes (Rashotte and Goertzen, 2010). Expression of many members of the AP2/EREBP gene family is altered in response to abiotic (Chen et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Kizis et al., 2001; Xiong et al., 2002) and biotic stresses (Lin et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Greenhouse and field culture systems were used to study the effect of drought conditions on the storage root (SR) formation in ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). In the greenhouse culture system, drought was simulated by withholding water for 5 and 10 days after transplanting (DAT) cuttings in dry sand. Control plants received water at planting and every 3 days thereafter. In the field studies, natural drought conditions and selective irrigation were used to impose water deprivation during the critical SR formation period. Greenhouse drought for 5 and 10 DAT reduced the number of SRs by 42% and 66%, respectively, compared with the controls. Field drought resulted in a 49% reduction in U.S. #1 SR yield compared with the irrigated condition. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis showed differential expression of a set of sweetpotato transcription factors and protein kinases among greenhouse-grown plants subjected to well-watered conditions and water deficit during 5 DAT. A significant enhancement of expression was observed for known drought stress-associated genes such as an abscisic acid-responsive elements-binding factor, dehydration-responsive element-binding factor, and homeodomain- zip proteins. Members of calcium-binding proteins showed differential expression under drought stress. For the first time it is reported that knotted1-like homeobox and BEL1-like genes showed altered expression in response to drought stress under a greenhouse condition. In summary, the results suggest that water deprivation during the SR formation period influences root development and expression patterns of stress-responsive genes and those previously found associated with SR formation in sweetpotato.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. American Society for Horticultural Science
  • Source
    • "These genes were originally identified in arabidopsis microarray experiments of cytokinin response as transcription factor family members that were highly induced at multiple time points after exogenous application of cytokinin (Rashotte et al., 2003). Recent works have revealed the presence of 12 CRFs in Arabidopsis thaliana (AtCRFs) and also similar numbers in other plant genomes including 11 Solanum lycopersicum (SlCRFs) (Rashotte and Goertzen, 2010; Cutcliffe et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012). Much of the study of CRFs has focused on the arabidopsis system (Rashotte et al., 2006; Cutcliffe et al., 2011), although initial examinations of CRFs in tomato has shown that some SlCRFs are induced by cytokinin in leaves and that one SlCRF gene is expressed in the vasculature of various organs similar to Abbreviations: ABA, abscissic acid; AP2/ERF, APETALA2/ERF; BA, benzyladenine; CRF, cytokinin response factor; SlCRF3, Solanum lycopersicum Cytokinin Response Factor 3; SlCRF5, Solanum lycopersicum Cytokinin Response Factor 5. * Corresponding author at: 101 Rouse Life Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences , Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cytokinin is an influential hormone involved in numerous aspects of plant growth and development. A group of transcription factors-cytokinin response factors (CRFs) has been included as a side branch to cytokinin signaling pathway which also constitute a subset of the AP2/ERF family of transcription factor proteins. This study examined the expression patterns of two transcription factor genes SlCRF3 and SlCRF5 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to determine their regulation in response to cytokinin and a variety of abiotic stress conditions. Analyses conducted during different developmental stages by RT-PCR or GUS reporter gene expression revealed that these genes are differentially expressed in vegetative and reproductive organs. qRT-PCR experiments were also performed to study regulation by the hormone cytokinin and abiotic stress conditions such as flooding, drought, osmotic, oxidative, and temperature. These showed that SlCRF3 and SlCRF5 have different patterns of regulation in leaf, stem, and roots with SlCRF5 showing greater induction in leaf or root tissue compared to SlCRF3 in most cases. Additionally, knockdown analysis for SlCRF5 revealed defects across development including leaf morphology, primary root growth, and lateral root formation. Together, these findings indicate that SlCRF3 and SlCRF5 are potential regulators of tomato developmental processes associated with cytokinin or abiotic stresses.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2013 · Journal of plant physiology
Show more