Early Adoption of Injectable Naltrexone for Alcohol-Use Disorders: Findings in the Private-Treatment Sector

Institute for Behavioral Research, 112 Barrow Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2401, USA.
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs (Impact Factor: 2.76). 05/2010; 71(3):460-6. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.460
Source: PubMed


The U.S. substance-abuse treatment system has been slow to adopt medications for the treatment of alcohol-use disorders (AUDs). The objectives of this study are to (a) determine how the inherent characteristics of injectable naltrexone (i.e., relative advantage, complexity, trialability, observability, compatibility) shape organizational-level decisions to adopt the medication and (b) identify key predictors of adoption and barriers that impede adoption.
This study uses data from a nationally representative sample of 345 privately funded U.S. substance-abuse treatment programs to examine adoption (current use) of injectable naltrexone.
Sixteen percent of private treatment programs are early adopters of injectable naltrexone. Multivariate logistic regression models reveal that organizational size and percentage of patients paying with private insurance are significant predictors of adoption. The most salient predictor of adoption is innovation compatibility, measured by program use of other AUD pharmacotherapies. Barriers to adoption include cost, lack of access to prescribing physicians, and lack of knowledge about the medication. Injectable naltrexone, however, is addressing the patient compliance barrier, demonstrated by 70% of patients receiving at least 2 months of medication.
The adoption of AUD pharmacotherapies remains low, with only half of the sampled programs prescribing any AUD pharmacotherapies. Patterns of early adoption of injectable naltrexone are, however, promising. Results highlight innovation compatibility and relative advantage as explanations of organizational decisions to adopt injectable naltrexone. Future research will move beyond issues of adoption and provide a more detailed examination of the implementation process.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul Michael Roman
  • Source
    • "Routine use in clinical practice for alcohol and opioid dependence, however, remains uncommon; a 2007/2008 survey of addiction treatment centers reported that 16% used XR-NTX for some patients (Abraham & Roman, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Medication Research Partnership (a national health plan and nine addiction treatment centers contracted with the health plan) sought to facilitate the adoption of pharmacotherapy for alcohol and opioid use disorders. Qualitative analysis of interviews with treatment center change leaders, individuals working for the manufacturer and its technical assistance contractor, and health plan managers extracted details on the processes used to order, store, bill for, and administer extended-release naltrexone. Qualitative themes were categorized using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, and provider characteristics). Characteristics of XR-NTX that inhibited use included the complexity of ordering and using the medication; cost was also a barrier. Outer setting barriers reflected patient needs and external health plan policies on formulary coverage, benefit management, and reimbursement. Program structures, the lack of physician linkages, a culture resistant to the use of medication, and unease with change were inner setting elements that limited use of XR-NTX. Patient stereotypes and a lack of knowledge about XR-NTX affected practitioner willingness to treat patients and prescribe XR-NTX. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research provided a useful lens to understand and interpret the processes affecting access to XR-NTX.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of substance abuse treatment
  • Source
    • "Central to this uncertainty are shifting medical and legal ambiguities surrounding the treatment of SUDs. For example, medications that aid the recovery process, recently expanded in variety and effectiveness, potentially conflict with long-standing regimens of treatment based on 12-step principles, advocating combinations of self-help, social support and spirituality (Abraham & Roman, 2010). In addition, a substantial proportion of SUDs patients may be processed through the criminal justice system, and face being imprisoned or re-imprisoned for non-conformity to prescribed treatment (Nolan, 2002; Henderson & Taxman, 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the relationships among general management systems, patient-focused quality management/continuous process improvement (TQM/CPI) processes, resource availability, and multiple dimensions of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Data are from a nationally representative sample of 221 SUD treatment centers through the National Treatment Center Study (NTCS). The design was a cross-sectional field study using latent variable structural equation models. The key variables are management practices, TQM/continuous quality improvement (CQI) practices, resource availability, and treatment center performance. Interviews and questionnaires provided data from treatment center administrative directors and clinical directors in 2007-2008. Patient-focused TQM/CQI practices fully mediated the relationship between internal management practices and performance. The effects of TQM/CQI on performance are significantly larger for treatment centers with higher levels of staff per patient. Internal management practices may create a setting that supports implementation of specific patient-focused practices and protocols inherent to TQM/CQI processes. However, the positive effects of internal management practices on treatment center performance occur through use of specific patient-focused TQM/CPI practices and have more impact when greater amounts of supporting resources are present.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2011 · Health Services Research
  • Source
    • "Studies have found a positive relationship between size and innovation, presumably because larger organizations have more financial and human resources (Damanpour & Schneider, 2006). In studies of innovation adoption in SUD treatment, treatment center size as measured by the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) has been positively associated with the adoption of buprenorphine (Knudsen, Ducharme, & Roman, 2006), integrated care for co-occurring disorders (Ducharme, Knudsen, Roman, 2006a), the adoption of injectable naltrexone for the treatment of alcohol use disorders (Abraham & Roman, 2010), and overall adoption of evidence-based practices (Friedmann, Taxman, & Henderson, 2007; Knudsen & Roman, 2004); but not with the adoption of disulfiram (Knudsen, Rpman, Ducharme, & Johnson, 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A promising area within technology transfer studies is the identification of organizational factors that influence the adoption of treatment innovations. Although studies have identified organizational factors associated with the adoption of pharmacological innovations, few studies have examined organizational factors in the adoption of psychosocial innovations, among which contingency management (CM) is a significant practice. Using data from a sample (N = 318) drawn from the population of publicly funded treatment centers in the United States, this study modeled organizational factors falling in the domains of structural characteristics, workforce variables, values and norms, and patient characteristics associated with the use of CM. Organizations were more likely to use CM if they embrace a supportive therapeutic approach, are research friendly, offer only outpatient levels of care, or serve drug-court patients. Implications for studying the diffusion and implementation of evidence-based psychosocial interventions are discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2011 · Journal of substance abuse treatment
Show more