ArticlePDF Available

Assistant-Independent OptiFlex System for Contact and Noncontact Wide-Angle Viewing in Vitreoretinal Surgery

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The wide-angle viewing system during vitreoretinal surgery has lead to an increased success rate of complex procedures. Two types of wide-angle viewing systems are in use, contact and noncontact, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we describe an optical system, OptiFlex, that is designed to combine the advantages of the contact and noncontact systems by enabling the surgeon to switch between them with ease and without skilled surgical assistance. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(4):490-492
Content may be subject to copyright.
SURGEONSCORNER
NEW INSTRUMENT
Assistant-Independent OptiFlex System
for Contact and Noncontact Wide-Angle
Viewing in Vitreoretinal Surgery
Ravi K. Murthy, MD; Kakarla V. Chalam, MD, PhD
The wide-angle viewing system during vitreoretinal surgery has lead to an increased suc-
cess rate of complex procedures. Two types of wide-angle viewing systems are in use,
contact and noncontact, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In this ar-
ticle, we describe an optical system, OptiFlex, that is designed to combine the advan-
tages of the contact and noncontact systems by enabling the surgeon to switch between them with
ease and without skilled surgical assistance. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(4):490-492
Viewing in vitreoretinal surgery has
evolved from conventional handheld
planoconcave lenses to the present
wide-angle viewing systems.1,2 The
wide-angle system allows a detailed
panoramic intraoperative view of the
retina through a small pupil, intraocular
lens, or keratoprosthesis. This techno-
logical advance has revolutionized vit-
reoretinal surgery, making it more effi-
cient and improving the success rate of
complicated operations.3
Two types of wide-angle systems are
currently in use: noncontact and con-
tact.1The advantages of a noncontact
viewing system are that a skilled surgical
assistant is not required; there is no
intraoperative corneal trauma; and it
provides a good view during air-fluid
exchange and in patients with steep cor-
neas. However, the image resolution and
stereopsis are superior with the contact
system, as it eliminates naturally occur-
ring corneal aberrations and limits the
number of reflecting surfaces.4The limi-
tations with the contact system include
poor views in patients with corneal
trauma and the need for a skilled surgical
assistant.1
A viewing system that combines the
advantages of both the contact and non-
contact systems gives the surgeon great
flexibility while operating on complex
vitreoretinal cases. OptiFlex (Volk, Men-
tor, Ohio), a new device, combines the
benefits of the 2 systems by allowing sur-
geons to switch easily between them,
eliminating the need for a skilled surgical
assistant.
OptiFlex, an electromechanical sys-
tem, guided through an operator-feed-
back system, senses the tension in the as-
sistant unit, makes microadjustments in
the electronic output, and optimizes lens
positioning and focus during vitreoreti-
nal surgery. It consists of a lens-position-
ing unit, which is attached to the micro-
scope using an adapter plate (Figure 1A)
and a reinverting operating lens system
(Figure 1B). The lens-positioning unit
acts through a swinging and pivoting ac-
tion and easily moves in and out of the
operating field. The ophthalmic surgical
lenses (both contact and noncontact) are
mounted onto the flexible arm of the lens-
positioning unit, and the movement of
the lens in the z-axis is controlled by a
power-operated foot switch to achieve
fine focus intraoperatively. When tension
is applied with assistance of the power
source, the flexible arm locks into posi-
tion and stabilizes the lens over the cor-
nea. The surgeon controls the initiation as
well as termination of tension with assis-
tance of the foot pedal and adjusts the po-
sition and orientation of the lens without
the need of a surgical assistant.
The reinverting operating lens is
positioned between the zoom system
Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida College
of Medicine, Jacksonville.
(REPRINTED) ARCH OPHTHALMOL /VOL 128 (NO. 4), APR 2010 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM
490
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
at University of Florida, on April 12, 2010 www.archophthalmol.comDownloaded from
and the beam splitter of the conventional operating
microscope and reinverts the image, creating a true,
erect, stereoscopic fundus to facilitate critical surgical
maneuvers. The reinverting operating lens system is
automated and controlled by the foot switch, eliminat-
ing the need for an assistant to move the prism lever
manually.
The surgical lenses are made of high-index glass and
are of both the contact and noncontact systems by de-
sign (Figure 2). The lenses are sterilized with standard
autoclave protocol. The surgeon switches from a con-
tact to a noncontact system by attaching the appropriate
lens to the lens-positioning unit (Figure 3). The intra-
operative field of view through the wide-angle lens is ap-
proximately 120°.
COMMENT
The wide-angle system has resolved many of the view-
ing challenges faced in vitreoretinal surgery and pro-
vides a panoramic view of the fundus with great
clarity.1The noncontact system binocular indirect
ophthalmomicroscope incorporates the system of indi-
rect ophthalmoscopy in the operating microscope,
while the contact system uses a miniaturized aspheric
contact panfundoscopic lens to provide wide-angle
observation of the fundus during vitreous surgery.5
Both the contact and the noncontact systems require
stereoscopic inversion of the images, which is
achieved by a prism set cased in an airtight, light-
weight container incorporated or positioned into the
microscope.1
The advantage of a noncontact wide-angle viewing sys-
tem like binocular indirect ophthalmomicroscope is that
a skilled surgical assistant is not required to hold the view-
ing contact lens. However, the image resolution and ste-
reopsis are inferior to the contact system in evaluating
the peripheral retina owing to spherical aberrations, im-
age distortion, and edge blur.1,4 The contact system elimi-
nates naturally occurring corneal aberrations and limits
the number of reflecting surfaces. The OptiFlex is de-
signed to combine the advantages of both the contact and
noncontact systems. The lens-positioning unit is de-
signed to accommodate lenses of either system. It pro-
vides a high-quality image using the contact system with-
out the help of a skilled surgical assistant. In addition,
the viewing system can be switched to a noncontact mode
in cases in which corneal distortion occurs with the con-
tact lens.
We used the system in more than 100 cases of com-
plex vitreoretinal surgery. The OptiFlex wide-angle
system anchors and stabilizes the surgical lens on the
B
A
Figure 1. OptiFlex system for contact and noncontact wide-angle viewing in
vitreoretinal surgery. A, The lens-positioning unit is attached to the operating
microscope through an adapter. B, The reinverting operating lens system is
positioned in between the eye piece and the beam splitter of the operating
microscope.
Figure 2. Wide angle (both contact and noncontact systems) lenses are fixed
to the lens-positioning unit during vitreoretinal surgery.
Figure 3. Surgeon using the OptiFlex system (contact lens mode) during
vitreoretinal surgery.
(REPRINTED) ARCH OPHTHALMOL /VOL 128 (NO. 4), APR 2010 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM
491
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
at University of Florida, on April 12, 2010 www.archophthalmol.comDownloaded from
patient’s corneal surface and obviates the need for an
assistant during vitreoretinal operations. The newer
design of the contact wide-angle system (with a 130°
view) is compact and does not interfere with vitrec-
tomy instruments. The fundus image clarity and field
of view throughout the surgical procedures was excel-
lent. The accessibility of having the desired field of
view for vitrectomy shortened the surgical time. No
compromise of the corneal surface was noted. The
OptiFlex was equally adept in assisting, whether or
not the adjunct was the contact or noncontact lens.
Submitted for Publication: August 19, 2009; final revi-
sion received October 12, 2009; accepted October 19,
2009.
Correspondence: Kakarla V. Chalam, MD, PhD,
Department of Ophthalmology, 580 W Eighth St,
Tower 2, 3rd Floor, Jacksonville, FL 32209 (kchalam
@jax.ufl.edu).
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
REFERENCES
1. DeGregorio PG, Hammer ME, Grizzard SE. Wide-angle viewing systems in vitreo-
retinal surgeries. In: Peyman GA, Meffert SA, Chou F, Conway MD, eds. Vitreo-
retinal surgical techniques. 2nd ed. London, England: Martin Dunitz; 2007:99-
106.
2. Shah VA, Chalam KV. Autoclavable wide-angle contact lens for vitreous surgery.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(2):359-360.
3. Lesnoni G, Billi B, Rossi T, Stirpe M. The use of panoramic viewing system in re-
laxing retinotomy and retinectomy. Retina. 1997;17(3):186-190.
4. Chalam KV, Shah VA. Optics of wide-angle panoramic viewing system–assisted
vitreous surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49(4):437-445.
5. Landers MB, Peyman GA, Wessels IF, Whalen P, Morales V. A new, non-contact
wide field viewing system for vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(1):
199-201.
Visit www.archophthalmol.com. As an in-
dividual subscriber, you may elect to be con-
tacted when a specific article is cited. Re-
ceive an e-mail alert when the article you are
viewing is cited by any of the journals hosted
by HighWire. You will be asked to enter the
volume, issue, and page number of the ar-
ticle you wish to track. Your e-mail address
will be shared with other journals in this fea-
ture; other journals’ privacy policies may dif-
fer from JAMA & Archives Journals. You may
also sign up to receive an e-mail alert when
articles on particular topics are published.
(REPRINTED) ARCH OPHTHALMOL /VOL 128 (NO. 4), APR 2010 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM
492
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
at University of Florida, on April 12, 2010 www.archophthalmol.comDownloaded from
... Different generations of contact lenses have been successively designed to improve the quality of the peripheral fundus view during examination and surgery while minimizing image distortion. [1][2][3][4][5] However, currently available lens systems are bulky, adding discomfort to the procedure and requiring superior skills, as the pupil, the lens, and the operator have to be coaxial to obtain a good-quality image. In this report, we describe the optical design of a novel miniaturized lightweight contact lens system for panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and compare it with the SuperQuad 160 lens system (Volk Optical, Inc., Mentor, OH, USA). ...
... Various contact and noncontact lens systems are available to enhance the visualization of the retina for these purposes. [1][2][3][4][5][6] The previous generation of wide-field contact lens systems (SuperQuad 160) uses a wider aperture to expand the field of view. This leads to an inherent difficulty in using the lens due to its bulky design. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and objective We describe a miniaturized lightweight high-refractive-index panretinal contact lens for diagnostic and therapeutic visualization of the peripheral retina. Instrument design The miniaturized high-resolution wide-field contact lens includes three optical elements in a light (15 g) and miniaturized (16 mm footplate, 24 mm external aperture, and 21 mm vertical height) casing contributing to a total dioptric power of +171 diopters. This lens provides up to 165° visualization of the retina for diagnostic and therapeutic applications while allowing easier placement due to its miniaturization. Conclusion This new lens (50% lighter and 89% smaller) improves upon earlier contact lenses for visualization of the peripheral retina.
... The small gauge (23 and 25 G) transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy systems became popular after the introduction by Eckardt [5] and Fujii et al. [6]. And the use of the wide-angle viewing system in vitreoretinal surgery has improved the success rate of complicated cases [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
PurposeTo describe and evaluate a novel technique of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under chandelier illumination which is aided with the vital dyes and perfluorocarbon liquids for the management of the complex diabetic vitrectomy cases.Methods We conducted a prospective interventional comparative study on 40 eyes of 36 patients with advanced diabetic eye disease requiring PPV. The study was conducted in a single tertiary referral center. Eyes were divided on 1:1 basis by stratified randomization into two groups. Group 1 had trimanual vitrectomy done assisted with chandelier illumination, perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) and vital dyes. Group 2 had the conventional bimanual vitrectomy done assisted with chandelier illumination only. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months after the surgery.ResultsForty eyes of 36 patients with the mean age of 51.42 years (range 28–69) were evaluated. The anatomical success at 6 months could be achieved in all the eyes in both groups. The complete removal of the pre-retinal proliferations could be accomplished in all the eyes in the trimanual PPV group, and only in 85% of the eyes in the bimanual PPV group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the trimanual PPV group (p < 0.001). More eyes in the trimanual PPV group (55.0%) could achieve better vision (> 6/60) 6 months after the operation compared to the bimanual PPV group (50.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion Trimanual PPV is a novel, safe and effective technique that can improve the results of the complex diabetic PPV.
... previous report describing an approach to use both types of visualization, but it does not seem to have gained much popularity. 4 RESIGHT 700 Fundus Viewing System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) is a noncontact WAVs that incorporates a focusing device (varioscope) between the microscope and the lens that can be implemented manually or by using a foot pedal. The distance between the varioscope system and wide-angle lens is fixed, and the lens is attached to a spring-loaded arm that retracts to avoid corneal lesions if the microscope head is erroneously moved instead of the varioscope when attempting to focus. ...
... Micro-surgeons may have hand tremor on the order of 50-100 microns [1]. Retinal surgery such as 3-port pars plana vitrectomy requires precise fine motor control to achieve surgical objectives and to reduce surgical risks [2][3]. Unintended surgeon, instrument or patient movement can result in ocular injury and difficulty in performing critical surgical tasks. ...
Article
Full-text available
Microsurgeons require the ability to make precise and stable maneuvers in order to achieve surgical objectives and to minimize surgical risks during freehand microsurgical procedures. This work presents a novel common path swept source optical coherence tomography based smart surgical tool that suppresses hand tremor. It allows enhanced tool tip stabilization, more accurate targeting and may lower surgical risk. Here the one dimensional motion tremor of a surgeon's hand is assessed by the surgical instrument. The ability to accurately locate a surgical target and the ability to maintain tool tip offset distances in a chicken embryo model are significantly improved as compared to freehand use.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The non-contact wide-angle viewing system (WAVS) with chandelier endoillumination is being used more commonly during scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments although its safety has not been established. We report our findings in a case of bacterial endophthalmitis that developed after scleral buckling surgery with WAVS and chandelier endoillumination. Observations: A 42-year-old man underwent scleral buckling surgery for a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in his right eye using a WAVS with chandelier endoillumination. Three days after the surgery, the patient noticed a marked decrease in his vision with ocular pain. Slit-lamp examination showed dense infiltration in the anterior chamber and vitreous body. Pars plana vitrectomy with antibiotic irrigation was done immediately, and Staphylococcus epidermidis was detected in the vitreous fluid. After vancomycin 6/day for 4 weeks, the inflammation gradually subsided, and the visual acuity recovered to 20/20 in 3 months. Conclusions and importance: Acute bacterial endophthalmitis can develop after scleral buckling surgery performed with WAVS and chandelier endoillumination.
Article
Aim: To compare the effects of scleral buckling using wide-angle viewing systems (WAVS) with that using indirect ophthalmoscope for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: The study was a retrospective analyses of the medical records of 94 eyes (94 patients) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Among them, 47 eyes underwent scleral buckling using WAVS with endoilluminator (Group W), and 47 eyes underwent scleral buckling using indirect ophthalmoscope (Group I). Surgical durations, primary success rate, best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA), delayed subretinal fluid absorptions and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. Results: At baseline, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in patient's age (P=0.997), gender (P=0.853), symptom duration (P=0.216), BCVA (P=0.389), refractive error (P=0.167), intraocular pressure (P=0.595), the number of retinal breaks (P=0.832), the extent of retinal detachment (P=0.246), subretinal demarcation line (P=0.801), and macular detachment (P=0.811). The follow-up period was 12mo. The surgical durations in Group W (with or without encircling buckling) were significant shorter than those in Group I (P<0.001 respectively). The primary success rate was 94.27% in Group W, which was similar to that in Group I (92.38%, P?=?0.931). The BCVA in Group W was better than that in Group I (P<0.001) at 1-month follow-up visit. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups at 3-month (P=0.221), 6-month (P=0.674), and 12-month (P=0.363) follow-up visits respectively. Delayed subretinal fluid absorptions were more common in Group I than in Group W at 1-month (P=0.045) follow-up visit, but there were no significant differences between the two groups at 3-month (P=0.111), 6-month (P=1.000) and 12-month follow-up visits respectively. Conclusion: Scleral buckling using WAVS can be an alternative choose for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article
The authors propose a novel trimanual vitreous surgery using assistant-adjusted endoillumination during 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy for severe diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) under noncontact wide-angle viewing system. The trimanual sutureless vitrectomy under a wide-angle viewing system consisted of (1) a fourth-port microcannula in the inferior 6-o'clock position; (2) dynamic and specular illumination by an assistant-controlled light probe inserted through the fourth port; and (3) membrane dissection and bleeding control using two intraocular instruments. Six eyes of four patients who underwent trimanual diabetic vitrectomy were evaluated. Recurrent TRD was detected in one eye, and a second operation was performed. There were no intraoperative sclerotomy-related complications or postoperative hypotony, increased IOP, or endophthalmitis. Final anatomic and functional success was achieved in all six eyes. The trimanual technique is valuable for membrane dissection in severe diabetic TRD. The optimal and dynamic illumination provided a high-quality stereoscopic view under a wide-angle viewing system. Careful coordination between a surgeon and an assistant facilitates this technique. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46:73-76.]. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.
Article
Full-text available
Microsurgeons require dexterity to make precise and stable maneuvers to achieve surgical objectives and to minimize surgical risks during freehand procedures. This work presents a novel, common path, swept source optical coherence tomography-based “smart” micromanipulation aided robotic-surgical tool (SMART) that actively suppresses surgeon hand tremor. The tool allows enhanced tool tip stabilization, more accurate targeting and the potential to lower surgical risk. Freehand performance is compared to smart tool-assisted performance and includes assessment of the one-dimensional motion tremor in an active microsurgeon’s hand. Surgeon hand tremor—the ability to accurately locate a surgical target and maintain tool tip offset distances—were all improved by smart tool assistance.
Article
Full-text available
Retinotomies and retinectomies are surgical procedures mainly devoted to the peripheral retina that require optimal visibility and adequate magnification to make the surgeon's task easy, quick, and safe. The purpose of present study was to estimate to what extent the introduction of wide-angle viewing systems can help the surgeon perform safer and more effective retinotomy procedures. The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of patients undergoing retinotomy procedures between 1993 and 1995 and divided them into two groups according to the viewing system used during the retinotomy procedures. Group 1 included 86 eyes that underwent surgery between July 1991 and June 1993 with Lander's plano-concave and prismatic lenses (Optikon, Rome, Italy), and group 2 included 96 eyes that underwent surgery between July 1993 and June 1995 with the Advanced Vitreoretinal Instruments system (New York, NY). Outcome measures were divided into preoperative (diagnosis at baseline, anterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade and extension, and visual acuity), intraoperative (size of retinotomy, number of laser spots, need for scleral depression, lensectomy, intraocular lens and capsule removal, and duration of treatment) and postoperative (anatomic success rates, visual acuity, postoperative intraocular pressure, and need for postoperative laser treatment and follow-up treatment). Among preoperative parameters, there were no significant differences between the two groups. For intraoperative parameters, eyes in group 2 underwent significantly shorter surgical procedures, had less of a need for scleral depression, and, as a group, had a higher average number of laser spots. For postoperative parameters, eyes in group 2 had a significantly lower need for laser treatment at the edge of retinotomy after surgery. Our results suggest that the use of a panoramic viewing system significantly decreases the time required for intervention, allowing more complete laser treatment along the edge of the retinotomy and lowering the need for scleral depression. The need for completion of laser treatment along the edge of the retinotomy after surgery also is reduced significantly, possibly increasing patient comfort because, especially in the early postoperative days, postoperative laser treatment can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient and difficult to perform for the surgeon. No prognostic benefit has been proven for any of the two groups because anatomic and visual results were overlapped.
Article
To report a new, noncontact wide field viewing system for vitreoretinal surgery. Device description: A noncontact wide field viewing system consisting of adjustable hinged arm and a combined condensing lens and reinverting prism has been developed. The arm clamps onto the operating table or wrist rest and holds the lens system in the air above the eye. For vitreoretinal surgery, a new, relatively inexpensive noncontact wide field viewing system consisting of an adjustable hinged arm and a combined condensing lens and reinverting prism has been developed. The combination condensing lens and reinverting prism is used without a microscope-mounted inverter. The optical component may be sterilized with ethylene oxide, peracetic acid, or glutaraldehyde. Other components may be steam autoclaved. The new, noncontact wide field viewing system has been used satisfactorily in more than 200 vitrectomies at seven medical centers. It provides an excellent view of the vitreous and retina. A new, noncontact wide field viewing system for vitreoretinal surgery has been developed with satisfactory image quality and a field of view comparable to contemporary noncontact panoramic viewing systems.
Article
To evaluate an autoclavable self-stabilizing wide-angle contact lens for vitrectomy. Observational study. The wide-angle contact lens has two lens pieces within a high temperature-resistant (150 C) plastic casing. The inferior lens with footplates is made of acrylic and the superior of glass. During surgery the lens is used as the self-stabilizing wide-angle contact lens with improved stability on the eye. The lens enables the surgeon to address the peripheral retina with less dependence on the assistant. The lens is sterilizable by autoclaving. The field of view of the wide-angle lens is 106 degrees static and 127 degrees dynamic view. The autoclavable self-stabilizing wide-angle lens reduces the cost and time for sterilization.
Article
The purpose of the article is to describe the optics of the contact wide-angle lens system with stereo-reinverter for vitreous surgery. A panoramic viewing system is made up of two components; an indirect ophthalmoscopy lens system for fundus image viewing, which is placed on the patient's cornea as a contact lens, and a separate removable prism system for reinversion of the image mounted on the microscope above the zooming system. The system provides a 104 degrees field of view in a phakic emmetropic eye with minification, which can be magnified by the operating microscope. It permits a binocular stereoptic view even through a small pupil (3 mm) or larger. In an air-filled phakic eye, field of view increases to approximately 130 degrees. The obtained image of the patient's fundus is reinverted to form true, erect, stereoscopic image by the reinversion system. In conclusion, this system permits wide-angle panoramic view of the surgical field. The contact lens neutralizes the optical irregularities of the corneal surface and allows improved visualization in eyes with irregular astigmatism induced by corneal scars. Excellent visualization is achieved in complex clinical situations such as miotic pupils, lenticular opacities, and in air-filled phakic eyes.
Wide-angle viewing systems in vitreoretinal surgeries
  • Pg Degregorio
  • Me Hammer
  • Se Grizzard
  • Ga Peyman
  • Sa Meffert
  • F Chou
  • Md Conway
DeGregorio PG, Hammer ME, Grizzard SE. Wide-angle viewing systems in vitreoretinal surgeries. In: Peyman GA, Meffert SA, Chou F, Conway MD, eds. Vitreoretinal surgical techniques. 2nd ed. London, England: Martin Dunitz; 2007:99- 106.