Article

Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues

Center for the Study of Brain Mind and Behavior, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 7.37). 03/2010; 5(4):432-40. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Perception of both gaze-direction and symbolic directional cues (e.g. arrows) orient an observer's attention toward the indicated location. It is unclear, however, whether these similar behavioral effects are examples of the same attentional phenomenon and, therefore, subserved by the same neural substrate. It has been proposed that gaze, given its evolutionary significance, constitutes a 'special' category of spatial cue. As such, it is predicted that the neural systems supporting spatial reorienting will be different for gaze than for non-biological symbols. We tested this prediction using functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the brain's response during target localization in which laterally presented targets were preceded by uninformative gaze or arrow cues. Reaction times were faster during valid than invalid trials for both arrow and gaze cues. However, differential patterns of activity were evoked in the brain. Trials including invalid rather than valid arrow cues resulted in a stronger hemodynamic response in the ventral attention network. No such difference was seen during trials including valid and invalid gaze cues. This differential engagement of the ventral reorienting network is consistent with the notion that the facilitation of target detection by gaze cues and arrow cues is subserved by different neural substrates.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lauri Nummenmaa
  • Source
    • "A number of studies reported that the observation of averted eyes compared with straight eyes or other control stimuli, elicited more activation in several brain regions, including the posterior superior temporal sulcus/middle temporal gyrus (Calder et al., 2002;Engell and Haxby, 2007;Hoffman and Haxby, 2000;Hooker et al., 2003;Pelphrey et al., 2003;Puce et al., 1998;Sato et al., 2008;Wicker et al., 1998), fusiform gyrus (Calder et al., 2002;George et al., 2001;Pelphrey et al., 2003;Wicker et al., 1998), inferior parietal lobule (Calder et al., 2002;Hoffman and Haxby, 2000;Pelphrey et al., 2003;Sato et al., 2008;Wicker et al., 1998), and middle/inferior frontal gyrus (Calder et al., 2002;Hooker et al., 2003;Wicker et al., 1998). Several studies investigated the brain activation in response to averted versus straight eyes in the framework of the cueing paradigm (Callejas et al., 2013;Cazzato et al., 2012;Engell et al., 2010;Greene et al., 2009;Hietanen et al., 2006;Kingstone et al., 2004;Sato et al., 2009;Tipper et al., 2008). Although foci, methodologies, and results were not identical across these studies and disagreements persist, several of these studies (Greene et al., 2009;Sato et al., 2009;Tipper et al., 2008) were consistent in reporting that the temporal, parietal, and frontal regions were involved in attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behavioral studies have shown that eye gaze triggers attentional shifts both with and without conscious awareness. However, the neural substrates of conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze remain unclear. To investigate this issue, we measured brain activity using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants observed averted or straight eye-gaze cues presented supraliminally or subliminally in the central visual field and then localized a subsequent target in the peripheral visual field. Reaction times for localizing the targets were shorter under both supraliminal and subliminal conditions when eye-gaze cues were directionally congruent with the target locations than when they were directionally neutral. Conjunction analyses revealed that a bilateral cortical network, including the middle temporal gyri, inferior parietal lobules, anterior cingulate cortices, and superior and middle frontal gyri, was activated more in response to averted eyes than to straight eyes under both supraliminal and subliminal conditions. Interaction analyses revealed that the right inferior parietal lobule was specifically active when participants viewed averted eyes relative to straight eyes under the supraliminal condition; the bilateral subcortical regions, including the superior colliculus and amygdala, and the middle temporal and inferior frontal gyri in the right hemisphere were activated in response to averted versus straight eyes under the subliminal condition. These results suggest commonalities and differences in the neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · NeuroImage
  • Source
    • "Several studies have investigated the neural substrates of social attention in human and non-human primates with particular emphasis on the role of the gaze (Callejas, Shulman, & Corbetta, 2014; Deaner et al., 2003; Engell et al., 2010; Greene, Mooshagian, Kaplan, Zaidel, & Iacoboni, 2009; Sato, Kochiyama, Uono, & Yoshikawa, 2009; Shepherd et al., 2009; Tipper et al., 2008). Yet, the functional and neural bases underlying these processes are not completely understood. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In highly social groups like human and non human primates, gaze and pointing cues are fundamentally important for directing the attention of conspecifics. Although neuroimaging studies indicate that shifts of attention triggered by observation of social cues activate the onlookers’ fronto-parietal cortices, information on whether these regions play a causative role in orienting and re-orienting of social attention is lacking. To advance our understanding of this, we used event-related repetitive dual pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to interfere with neural activity in the right frontal eye field (rFEF) and posterior parietal cortex (rPPC). This procedure allowed us to explore how inhibiting rFEF and rPPC influences shifts of attention triggered by the observation of body-related (gaze and hand) and non body-related (arrow) directional distractors. Participants were asked to perform a leftward or rightward pointing movement according to the color change of a central imperative signal while ignoring a distractor, which was either a gaze, a pointing hand or an arrow. Stimulation of rPPC in a region supposedly linked to attentional re-orienting and to planning and execution of upper limb movements increased the reflexive tendency to follow distracting pointing hands but not oriented gaze or arrows. These findings suggest that inhibition of cortical structures that control attentional shifts triggered by social stimuli brings forth an increase of the cost of attentional re-orienting. Moreover, our results provide the first causative evidence that reflexive social attention in humans may be coded according to body-part-centered frames of reference.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · Neuropsychologia
  • Source
    • "). The exact role of this region in social and symbolic cuing has remained unclear despite several studies (Engell et al., 2010), in part due to the limited temporal precision of imaging techniques. Electrophysiological investigation will no doubt help address these issues, but it must be noted that no direct parallel to arrow cues exists in animals; most modern-day humans learn to respond automatically to arrows through a lifetime of acculturation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Humans and other primates shift their attention to follow the gaze of others [gaze following (GF)]. This behavior is a foundational component of joint attention, which is severely disrupted in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and schizophrenia. Both cortical and subcortical pathways have been implicated in GF, but their contributions remain largely untested. While the proposed subcortical pathway hinges crucially on the amygdala, the cortical pathway is thought to require perceptual processing by a region in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). To determine whether pSTS is necessary for typical GF behavior, we engaged rhesus macaques in a reward discrimination task confounded by leftward- and rightward-facing social distractors following saline or muscimol injections into left pSTS. We found that reversible inactivation of left pSTS with muscimol strongly suppressed GF, as assessed by reduced influence of observed gaze on target choices and saccadic reaction times. These findings demonstrate that activity in pSTS is required for normal GF by primates.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2012 · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Show more