ArticlePDF Available

The Use of Whole-Body Vibration as a Golf Warm-Up

Authors:
  • CyMO Research Institute, Spain

Abstract and Figures

The purpose of this case series was to test the effectiveness of an active warm-up for recreational golfers using a whole-body vibration (WBV) platform. The variables that the warm-up tested for were increased flexibility, power, and golf performance. Ten adult men (age: 45 ± 15 yr) volunteered to perform their personal warm-up and record 7 of their golf swings. They then participated in an active warm-up involving flexibility exercises on the iTonic WBV platform and then recorded 7 more golf swings. The settings for the iTonic WBV platform were set to a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 2 mm, and each exercise was performed for 30 seconds. Eight different exercises were used for this warm-up. Significant changes (p < 0.05) were measured after the WBV warm-up in the following variables: sit and reach, ball speed, carry distance, and total distance. In a subgroup of subjects less than 45 years of age (n = 5), results mimicked those reported for the entire group in that both flexibility and power measures improved significantly. Subjects older than 45 years (n = 5) did not significantly (p < 0.05) improve in power measures but did improve sit and reach similarly to the younger group. These data suggest that a profound increase in the flexibility and power output of individual golfers occurs when a WBV warm-up bout is performed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
THE USE OF WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AS A
GOLF WARM-UP
DEREK J. BUNKER,
1
MATTHEW R. RHEA,
1
TED SIMONS,
2
AND PEDRO J. MARIN
3
1
A.T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona;
2
Nicklaus Golf Academies, Eagle, Idaho; and
3
European University Miguel de Cervantes,
Valladolid, Spain
ABSTRACT
Bunker, DJ, Rhea, MR, Simons, T, and Marin, PJ. The use of
whole-body vibration as a golf warm-up. J Strength Cond
Res 24(x): 000–000, 2010—The purpose of this case series
was to test the effectiveness of an active warm-up for
recreational golfers using a whole-body vibration (WBV)
platform. The variables that the warm-up tested for were
increased flexibility, power, and golf performance. Ten adult
men (age: 45 615 yr) volunteered to perform their personal
warm-up and record 7 of their golf swings. They then
participated in an active warm-up involving flexibility exercises
on the iTonic WBV platform and then recorded 7 more golf
swings. The settings for the iTonic WBV platform were set to
a frequency of 50 Hz and an amplitude of 2 mm, and each
exercise was performed for 30 seconds. Eight different
exercises were used for this warm-up. Significant changes
(p,0.05) were measured after the WBV warm-up in the
following variables: sit and reach, ball speed, carry distance,
and total distance. In a subgroup of subjects less than 45 years
of age (n= 5), results mimicked those reported for the entire
group in that both flexibility and power measures improved
significantly. Subjects older than 45 years (n= 5) did not
significantly (p,0.05) improve in power measures but did
improve sit and reach similarly to the younger group. These data
suggest that a profound increase in the flexibility and power
output of individual golfers occurs when a WBV warm-up bout
is performed.
KEY WORDS power, flexibility
INTRODUCTION
The golf swing is a complex movement that uses the
nervous, muscular, and skeletal systems in a co-
ordinated fashion. Optimal swing performance is
hindered if there is stiffness or limitations in range
of motion. Finding ways to decrease the occurrence or
severity of muscle/joint stiffness is an important aspect in the
field of exercise science and health promotion.
Getting ready for any competition, such as golf, requires
a proper warm-up. Golf injuries are common because of the
link between the fast moving golf club and power-generating
torsion (8). There is basic scientific evidence that suggests
that an active warm-up may be protective against muscle
strain injury (14). Also, the relationship of flexibility to
athletic performance is likely to be sport specific (5). Various
symptoms of an improper warm-up may be felt before or at
the beginning of a round of golf. Those symptoms include
muscle or joint stiffness or pain, which can result in a decrease
in explosiveness and alterations in swing mechanics.
The use of a general warm-up may be used to enhance
physical performance and prevent sports-related injuries
among golfers. Warm-up techniques are primarily used to
increase body temperature and are classified into 3 major
categories: (1) passive warm-up, which increases temperature
by some external means; (2) general warm-up, which
increases temperature by nonspecific body movements;
and (3) specific warm-up, which increases temperature using
similar body parts that will be used in the subsequent, more
strenuous activity (17). The majority of the benefits of
a warm-up are related to the temperature-dependent
physiologic processes. An elevation in body temperature
produces an increase in the dissociation of oxygen from
hemoglobin and myoglobin, a lowering of the activation
energy rates of metabolic chemical reactions, an increase
in muscle blood flow, a reduction in muscle viscosity, an
increase in the sensitivity of nerve receptors, and an increase
in the speed of nervous impulses (17). Warm-up may also
reduce the incidence and likelihood of sports-related
musculoskeletal injuries. Improving flexibility through
stretching is another important preparatory activity that
has been advocated to improve physical performance.
Maintaining good flexibility aids in the prevention of injuries
to the musculoskeletal system (17).
A general warm-up that can accomplish all that has been
listed above may require 20 to 30 minutes of light aerobic
exercise and stretching. An active warm-up on the iTonic
whole-body vibration (WBV, Logan, UT, USA) system may
facilitate an effective, quick warm-up among golfers. During
Address correspondence to Derek Bunker, dbunker@atsu.edu.
0(0)/1–5
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Ó2010 National Strength and Conditioning Association
VOLUME 0 | NUMBER 0 | MONTH 2010 | 1
the last decade, several controlled studies suggest the positive
effects of WBV in strength or power development (3,13),
flexibility (4,18), and bone mass (12). This WBV training has
also been shown to have a positive effect on range of motion
of the hamstrings (18). This same response among golfers
could have valuable outcomes.
During the golf swing, it is also important to create as much
power, or explosiveness, as possible. There are data indicating
that vibration may enhance measures of explosiveness (11).
Explosive strength is defined as the ability of the neuromus-
cular system to produce dynamic force rapidly in an open
kinetic-chain movement, such as jumping, in which rate of
force development is at or near maximum (16). Several
studies and reviews have indicated that performance
enhancement, including force production, may be achieved
by the effects of acute local vibration (7,9). Therefore, it
may be advantageous to use a combination of vibration and
stretching as part of the warm-up, thus enhancing range of
motion and preserving or enhancing explosive performance
(15). The improvement in muscular power after acute
exposure to WBV results in performance gains that would
otherwise require weeks of training (2). The purpose of this
research was to examine the efficacy of WBVduring an active
warm-up to increase flexibility and power, along with
subsequent golf performance.
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
To examine the influence of WBV on the extent of
a general warm-up for golf, recreational golfers were
subjected to a dynamic WBV warm-up in between
2 sessions of hitting. Each individual performed their
personal pregolf warm-up, performed a functional move-
ment squat test, and performed a sit and reach test before
hitting 7 shots with the driver and having their
performance recorded. Next, with proper instruction, each
of the golfers was taken through a bout of WBV stretching
exercises. The functional movement squat test and the sit
and reach were performed again with the results recorded.
After the WBV warm-up, subjects rested for 3 minutes and
then performed 7 more swings with their driver, again
with the results being recorded. Changes in performance
on the fitness and the shot performance were evaluated to
determine the effect of WBV.
Subjects
Ten adult men (age: 45 615 yr; handicap: 10 67) volunteered
to participate in this case-series study. All subjects reported
participation in aerobic exercise at least 2 days per week for
3 months before beginning the study; however, none reported
participation in resistance training sessions during that time.
None reported any physical conditions that would impair
their ability to perform WBV exercise. Participants provided
informed consent to participate in this study, which was
conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki
and approved by a review board for research with human
subjects.
Procedures
The subjects arrived at their scheduled times. Each subject
began performing his individual warm-up that he routinely
did before beginning a round of golf. After the warm-up was
complete, he performed the overhead squat (a functional
movement screen test). Performance was evaluated and
recorded. He then performed a standard sit and reach test.
These results were evaluated and recorded. After these tests
were completed, the participants actively rested for 3 minutes.
After the rest period, the subjects stepped onto the tee box,
where the high-speed cameras were set up, and hit 7 golf balls
with their drivers. The data from their 7 drives was recorded.
Next, the subjects performed an active warm-up on the
WBV platform. The settings for the iTonic WBV machine
were set to a frequency of 50 Hz, with a 2 mm amplitude, and
each exercise was timed for 30 seconds. Eight different
stretches were used for this warm-up:
1. Forearm stretch. Subjects knelt facing the WBV machine,
placed their hands on the WBV platform, straightened
their arms, and leaned forward over their hands and
fingers, causing their forearms, wrists, hands, and fingers to
be stretched (Figure 1A).
2. Half pushup. While the subjects knelt in front of and facing
the WBV machine, they grabbed both sides of the WBV
platform and held the position of a half pushup for the
entire exercise. While in this position, the subjects shifted
their weight and moved to the left and the right to stretch
the muscles of the pectoral girdle (Figure 1B).
3. Cross-over. Subjects knelt in front of and facing the WBV
machine. They then crossed their arms, 1 over the other,
and grabbed hold of the far side of the WBV platform. The
subjects then sat back on their heels while pulling on
the platform to stretch their shoulders and the muscles of
the upper back (Figure 1C).
4. Cat and dog. Subjects knelt in the same position as the
above 3 stretches, grabbed the far side of the platform, and
arched their backs as much as possible, like a cat. Then,
from that position, they then sat back on their heels and
flattened their backs, like a dog. The subjects went back and
forth between the 2 back positions for the 30-second
exercise (Figure 1D, E).
5. Toe touch. Subjects stood on the WBV platform and faced
away from the controls. They placed their feet about
shoulder width apart with their knees slightly bent. They
then tried to touch their toes during the entire exercise
(Figure 1F).
6. Sumo squat. Subjects stood on the WBV platform and faced
the controls and handles. They placed their feet near the
sides of the platform and slightly pointed their toes outward.
Holding onto the handles, subjects squatted down below
parallel and shifted their weight from 1 foot to the other,
rockingtotheleftandtotheright(Figure1G).
2
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Whole Body Vibration Golf Warm-up
7. Lunge and reach. Subjects
placed a Bosu ball in front of
the WBV platform. They
placed 1 foot on the WBV
platform and the knee of
the other leg on the Bosu
ball (lunge position). While
in the lunge position, subjects
extended their arms to the
ceiling, twisted their torso in
the direction of the foot on
the platform, and leaned
back as well. They did
1 30-second exercise per foot
(Figure 1H).
8. Golf stance and rotate. Sub-
jects stood on the WBV
platform with their feet
shoulder width apart and
their backs toward the con-
trols. They bent their knees
and flexed their backs as in
preparing to swing a golf
club. Instead of a club, the
subjects held a medicine ball
and slowly moved the ball in
the same path of their golf
swing. They rotated their
torso, hips, arms, and should-
ers to mimic their golf swing
(Figure 1I, J).
Once subjects finished this
active warm-up on the WBV
platform, they then proceeded
with the same overhead squat
(functional movement screen)
and sit and reach tests that were
performed after their personal
golf warm-ups. These results
were evaluated and recorded.
The participants actively rested
for 3 minutes. When the rest
period was complete, the participants stepped onto the tee
box, where the high-speed cameras were situated, and hit 7
golf balls with their driver. The data from these 7 swings were
recorded.
Golf Performance Measures
The golf performance measures that were recorded were
golf ball spin, golf ball launch angle, distance the golf ball
carried during flight, total distance the golf ball traveled,
and the accuracy of the golf ball. The system to record
these measures consisted of high-speed cameras and
computer analysis software. The Jack Nicklaus Coaching
Studio Video and Data Analysis System of the Nicklaus
Golf Academy were used to measure and evaluate golf
performance.
Statistical Analyses
Descriptive statistics were calculated for each measurement
time. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test for normality
of the data and demonstrated that the data were normally
distributed. Therefore, a paired samples t-test was used to
compare pre- and post-WBV golf performance variables.
Because of the wide range of subject ages, 2 age groups were
created: less than 45 years and more than 45 years. After
the main analysis, subsequent paired samples t-tests were
completed with the data set separated according to age
Figure 1. Position adopted in each exercise: A) Forearm Stretch, B) ½ Pushup, C) Cross-over, D-E) Cat and Dog,
F) Toetouch, G) Sumo Squat, H) Lunge and Reach, and I-J) Golf Stance and Rotate.
VOLUME 0 | NUMBER 0 | MONTH 2010 | 3
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca-jscr.org
group. SPSS statistical software package v.14.0 (SPSS, Inc.,
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all calculations, with the level
of statistical significance set at p#0.05. Mean statistical
power for all analyses was found to be 0.89. Data are
expressed as mean 6SDs.
RESULTS
Significant changes (p,0.05) were measured after the WBV
warm-up in the following variables: sit and reach, ball speed,
carry distance, and total distance. Sit and reach measures
improved 8.00 63.37 cm, representing a significant
improvement in hamstring and low back flexibility (Figure 2).
All other significant changes related to improvements in
power: ball speed (+1.53 61.82 ms
21
), carry distance
(+9.72 611.86m), and total distance (+10.05 611.59 m)
(Figures 3 and 4).
In subgroup of subjects less than 45 years (36.6 64.7 yr;
n= 5), results mimicked those reported for the entire group
in that both flexibility and power measures improved
significantly; however, the average improvement was greater
in power (ball speed: +2.84 61.36 ms
21
; carry distance:
+19.11 60.68 m; total distance: +19.68 66.62m). Subjects
older than 45 years (54 64.6; n= 5) did not significantly
(p,0.05) improve in power measures but did improve in sit
and reach similarly to the younger group (Figure 5).
DISCUSSION
These data demonstrate a significant and profound benefit of
executing an active warm-up on a WBV platform. There is an
increase in the flexibility and power output of recreational
golfers when a WBV warm-up bout is performed. Such an
effect could prove valuable in the warming-up process of golf
and the effectiveness of play during the round. Although
further research is needed to identify physiologic mechanisms
by which WBV may result in increased flexibility and power,
the current data clearly demonstrate a positive effect on the
golf performance.
Figure 3. Mean and standard deviation of pre and post ball speed.
*Significant difference (p,0.05)
Figure 5. Age comparison. *Significant difference between groups
(p,0.05).
Figure 2. Mean and standard deviation of pre and post Sit and Reach.
*Significant difference (p,0.05).
Figure 4. Mean and standard deviation of pre and post carry distance
and total distance. *Significant difference (p,0.05).
4
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Whole Body Vibration Golf Warm-up
These effects on flexibility and power could be dependent
on vascular and neurophysiologic mechanisms. The WBV
can enhance the vibratory stimulus of the proprioceptive loop
and may also replicate a warm-up effect by increasing pain
threshold, blood flow, and muscle elasticity (2). It was also
found that the addition of vibration to a stretching routine
can increase flexibility while maintaining explosive strength
(5). The enhanced muscle power observed after acute
vibration is suggested to occur by way of potentiation of
the neuromuscular system, whereby stimulation of muscles
spindles (Ia afferents) results in reflex activation of motor
neurons with increased spatial recruitment (2).
The lack of improvement in power in the older than 45 year
group may require further research evaluations to validate and
explain. The frequency or the duration of the WBV systems
setting that was used may play a critical role in the amount of
flexibility and power individuals can achieve after performing
the specified exercises. The exercise bout may have been too
intense, although there may not have been enough recovery
time between the 8 exercises or between the completion of
the warm-up and when subjects began hitting golf balls. With
a lack of recovery time, their muscles may not have recovered
completely from the fatigue generated during the WBV
warm-up. Cochrane et al. (1), studying the acute physiologic
effects of acute WBV exercise in younger versus and older
people, found an interaction effect of vibration and group, in
which the WBV related to a VO
2
increase was less in an older
aged group compared with a younger aged group.
Another consideration when attempting to apply the
findings of this study to recreational golfers is the lasting effect
that a WBV warm-up might have on the human body. These
effects may be individualized and may only last for a brief
time. Identifying the optimal warm-up routine, as well as the
length of lasting beneficial effects, must be determined to
enable recreational golfers to most effectively take advantage
of possible benefits.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The WBV warm-up exercises, which are quick and efficient,
can help improve the flexibility and power output of
recreational golfers, considering that increased flexibility
during the golf swing and longer drive distances is beneficial
to all recreational golfers. Exercise professionals can imple-
ment this active WBV warm-up with any recreational golfer.
These professionals need only to adhere to the recommended
prescription contained within this article. The inclusion of
WBV in a warm-up is expected to enhance golf performance
by increasing flexibility and power.
REFERENCES
1. Cochrane, DJ, Sartor, F, Winwood, K, Stannard, SR, Narici, MV, and
Rittweger, J. A comparison of the physiologic effects of acute whole-
body vibration exercise in young and older people. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 89: 815–821, 2008.
2. Cochrane, DJ and Stannard, SR. Acute whole body vibration
training increases vertical jump and flexibility performance in elite
female field hockey players. Br J Sports Med 39: 860–865, 2005.
3. Delecluse, C, Roelants, M, and Verschueren, S. Strength increase
after whole body vibration compared with resistance training. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 35: 1033–1041, 2003.
4. Fagnani, F, Giombini, A, Di Cesare, A, Pigozzi, F, and Di Salvo, V.
The effects of a whole-body vibration program on muscle
performance and flexibility in female athletes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
85: 956–962, 2006.
5. Gleim, GW and McHugh, MP. Flexibility and its effects on sports
injury and performance. Sports Med 24: 289–299, 1997.
6. Kinser, AM, Ramsey, MW, O’Bryant, HS, Ayres, CA, Sands, WA,
and Stone, MH. Vibration and stretching effects on flexibility and
explosive strength in young gymnasts. Med Sci Sports Exerc
40: 133–140, 2008.
7. Luo, J, McNamara, B, and Moran, K. The use of vibration training to
enhance muscle strength and power. Sports Med 35: 23–41, 2005.
8. McHardy, A, Pollard, H, and Luo, K. Golf injuries: a review of the
literature. Sports Med 36: 171–187, 2006.
9. Mester, J, Spitzenfeil, P, Schwarzer, J, and Seifriz, F. Biological reaction
to vibration implications for sport. J Sci Med Sport 2: 211–226, 1999.
10. Rhea, MR, Bunker, DJ, Marı
´n, PJ, and Lunt, K. The effect of iTonicÒ
whole- body vibration on delayed-onset muscle soreness among
untrained individuals. Strength Cond Res 23: 1677–1682, 2009.
11. Ronnestad, BR. Comparing the performance enhancing effects of
squats on a vibration platform with conventional squats in
recreationally resistance trained men. J Strength Cond Res 18:
839–845, 2004.
12. Rubin, C, Recker, R, Cullen, D, Ryaby, J, McCabe, J, and McLeod, K.
Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by a low-magnitude, high-
frequency mechanical stimuli: a clinical trial assessing compliance,
efficacy, and safety. J Bone Miner Res 19: 343–351, 2003.
13. Russo, CR, Lauretani, F, Bandinelli, S, Bartali, B, Cavazzini, C,
Guralnik, JM, and Ferrucci, L. High-frequency vibration training
increases muscle power in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 84: 1854–1857, 2003.
14. Safran, MR, Garrett, WE Jr, Seaber, AV, Glisson, RR, and
Ribbeck, BM. The role of warm-up in muscular injury prevention.
Am J Sports Med 16: 123–129, 1988.
15. Sands, WA, McNeal, JR, Stone, MH, Russell, EM, and Jemni, M.
Flexibility enhancement with vibration: acute and long-term. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 38: 720–725, 2006.
16. Schmidtbleicher, D. Training for power events. In: Strength and
Power in Sport. Komi, PV, ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific
Publications, 1992. pp. 381–395.
17. Shellock, FG and Prentice, WE. Warming-up and stretching for
improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related
injuries. Sports Med 2: 267–278, 1985.
18. Van den Tillaar, R. Will whole-body vibration training help increase
the range of motion of the hamstrings? J Strength Cond Res 20: 192–
196, 2006.
VOLUME 0 | NUMBER 0 | MONTH 2010 | 5
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca-jscr.org
... Although static stretching is thought to have a negative effect on subsequent muscle strength and power activities, ACSM suggest that flexibility exercise is more effective when T m is elevated. When eight different stretches for 30 s were included with vibration exercise (50 Hz, 2 mm amplitude), sit-and-reach flexibility of golfers increased by 8 cm, a substantial rise of 87% compared to a generic golf warm-up [41]. A gain of 13.6% in sit-and-reach flexibility was noted when dynamic squatting was combined with an intermittent vibration protocol (30 s on, 30 s rest; 30 Hz, 4 mm) compared to no vibration [30]. ...
... A golf tee shot is dependent on maximising power output, such that a vibration warm-up (50 Hz, 2 mm) including eight different stretches for 30 s significantly improved ball speed, carry distance and total distance compared to a player-driven pre-golf warm-up ( Fig. 13.8). The authors claim that including vibration into a golfing warm-up may assist with improving golf swing performance [41]. ...
... In contrast, there was no difference in baseball bat speed following vibration (25 Hz, 13 mm) warm-up alone, batting swinging warm-up or vibration combined with bat swinging [46]. The short 30 s duration of the vibration exposure may explain why bat speed was not potentiated compared to 4.5 and 14-min of vibration from Bunker et al. [41] and Reyes et al. [45]. ...
Chapter
The importance of warm-up for subsequent exercise performance has been well documented. Various warm-up strategies have been implemented to optimise performance, which is dependent on the exerciser, sport, physical exertion, duration and recovery time between warm-up and the activity. Vibration exercise provides another technique for warming-up. It can complement traditional warm-up or it can be used in isolation. Vibration warm-up is able to raise muscle temperature, which is a precursor for improving subsequent short-duration performance, although resistance-training exercises may not be so reliant on increasing muscle temperature. Vibration warm-up has no additional ergogenic effect to increase short-term performance compared to other warm-up strategies when muscle temperature is equivalently elevated. Due to its time-efficient manner, vibration warm-up incurs a low metabolic cost. Accordingly, it can be used as a warm-up prior to physical activity and as a re-warm-up strategy during interval breaks to enhance subsequent performance. Vibration warm-up can enhance lower-limb muscular power and flexibility, and for specific sport warm-ups, it can be additive or standalone to ensure the appropriate changes.
... We refer to a few of these excluded studies without aiming for a comprehensive list (Bertuzzi et al. 2013;Cochrane and Booker 2014;Fachina et al. 2013;Jones et al. 2011;Reyes et al. 2011;Ronnestad and Ellefsen 2011;Viru et al. 2007;Wyon et al. 2010). We excluded studies that did examine 'competitive' and/or 'elite athletes' but did not use a comparison control group or a control condition (Bosco et al. 1999b;Bunker et al. 2011;Roberts et al. 2009;Ronnestad et al. 2012Ronnestad et al. , 2013, had no baseline data (Crow et al. 2012;Dabbs et al. 2010) or it was not possible to extract the means and standard deviations (Crow et al. 2012;Jones 2014;Mester et al. 2006), the athletes were outside the age range of 13-44 years (Kinser et al. 2008;Mahieu et al. 2006) to represent elite performance levels or measured features of athletic performance (i.e., gait kinematics) but not performance itself (Padulo et al. 2014). We also excluded studies that applied vibration focally directly to the muscle belly or tendon, through probes, hand-held devices, or cables (Bosco et al. 1999a;Cochrane and Hawke 2007;Issurin and Tenenbaum 1999) and used 50 Hz or higher frequencies (Bunker et al. 2011). ...
... We excluded studies that did examine 'competitive' and/or 'elite athletes' but did not use a comparison control group or a control condition (Bosco et al. 1999b;Bunker et al. 2011;Roberts et al. 2009;Ronnestad et al. 2012Ronnestad et al. , 2013, had no baseline data (Crow et al. 2012;Dabbs et al. 2010) or it was not possible to extract the means and standard deviations (Crow et al. 2012;Jones 2014;Mester et al. 2006), the athletes were outside the age range of 13-44 years (Kinser et al. 2008;Mahieu et al. 2006) to represent elite performance levels or measured features of athletic performance (i.e., gait kinematics) but not performance itself (Padulo et al. 2014). We also excluded studies that applied vibration focally directly to the muscle belly or tendon, through probes, hand-held devices, or cables (Bosco et al. 1999a;Cochrane and Hawke 2007;Issurin and Tenenbaum 1999) and used 50 Hz or higher frequencies (Bunker et al. 2011). In summary, we examined the acute and chronic effects of whole body vibration on (a) maximal voluntary force and power as proxies for athletic performance; (b) flexibility and joint range of motion; and (c) on athletic performance (e.g., basketball, sprinting, field hockey, netball, etc.). ...
Article
Purpose We quantified the acute and chronic effects of whole body vibration on athletic performance or its proxy measures in competitive and/or elite athletes. Methods Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Results Whole body vibration combined with exercise had an overall 0.3 % acute effect on maximal voluntary leg force (−6.4 %, effect size = −0.43, 1 study), leg power (4.7 %, weighted mean effect size = 0.30, 6 studies), flexibility (4.6 %, effect size = −0.12 to 0.22, 2 studies), and athletic performance (−1.9 %, weighted mean effect size = 0.26, 6 studies) in 191 (103 male, 88 female) athletes representing eight sports (overall effect size = 0.28). Whole body vibration combined with exercise had an overall 10.2 % chronic effect on maximal voluntary leg force (14.6 %, weighted mean effect size = 0.44, 5 studies), leg power (10.7 %, weighted mean effect size = 0.42, 9 studies), flexibility (16.5 %, effect size = 0.57 to 0.61, 2 studies), and athletic performance (−1.2 %, weighted mean effect size = 0.45, 5 studies) in 437 (169 male, 268 female) athletes (overall effect size = 0.44). Conclusions Whole body vibration has small and inconsistent acute and chronic effects on athletic performance in competitive and/or elite athletes. These findings lead to the hypothesis that neuromuscular adaptive processes following whole body vibration are not specific enough to enhance athletic performance. Thus, other types of exercise programs (e.g., resistance training) are recommended if the goal is to improve athletic performance.
... A variety of exercises have been reported to increase clubhead speed and carry distance, including using a vibrating apparatus [12], resistance band [13], golf-specific resistance training [14], multimodal exercise [15], plyometrics training [16], and weight stick [17] to increase golfer performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
Patient: Female, 43-year-old Final Diagnosis: Amateur golfer Symptoms: Golf swing Medication:— Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Public Health • Rehabilitation Objective Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment Background We investigated the effects of the upper-body flexibility exercises on the golf performance of a female amateur golfer. Case Report The participant was a 43-year-old woman who performed a general golf swing exercise (30 min) and an upper-body flexibility exercise (20 min) 3 times a week, for a total of 6 times in 2 weeks. The maximum rotation angle of the upper body was measured using a goniometer. To measure the X-factor, the numerical value was measured after subtracting the rotation angle of the lower-body from the rotation angle of the upper body when the participant stopped making a back-swing top motion. A camera measuring instrument was used to measure the clubhead speed and carry distance of the golf ball when she hit the ball with a no. 7 iron club. After the exercises, the maximum rotation angle of the participant’s upper body increased from 40° to 69°, and the X-factor increased from 10° to 24°. The clubhead speed increased from 29.4 m/s to 34.4 m/s, and the carry distance increased from 84 m to 106 m. Conclusions The participant responded positively to the upper-body flexibility exercises, and there was improved upper-body mobility, X-factor, clubhead speed, and carry distance. Our results showed that upper-body flexibility exercises with a general golf swing exercise for female amateur golfers may improve golf performance.
... So, perhaps the vibration effect may vary in young and older people. Bunker et al. [33] demonstrated different effects of WBV in people below and above the age of 45: in comparison to younger ones, participants older than 45 years did not significantly improve in power measures after WBV. Perhaps the response to WBV is related also to fitness level [25]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the study was to determine the acute effects of single-whole-body vibration (WBV) on resting metabolic rate (RMR) and carbohydrate–lipid profile of blood in young, healthy women. The participants, in a randomised controlled crossover study, participated in two trials: WBV and a vibration simulation (placebo). The WBV was performed in the prone position and cy-cloidal-oscillatory vibration was used. The RMR measurement (calorimetry) was performed: be-fore the WBV, during WBV, immediately after the completion of WBV, and 1 h after the comple-tion of WBV. For biochemical analyses, venous blood was collected. During WBV, there was a significant increase in RMR compared to baseline. Immediately after and 1 h following the end of the WBV, RMR was close to baseline levels (p > 0.05). The increased energy expenditure resulted from the increased utilisation of carbohydrates and proteins during the vibration. In the placebo condition, there were no significant changes over time in the level of the studied indices during calorimetry. The WBV had no significant effects on the level of glucose in the blood. The applied vibration did not significantly affect the concentration of the analysed lipid indices, which were within the physiological norms for all measurements. Results indicate the need for further re-search to establish the physiological mechanisms underlying the observed effects of WBV on rest-ing metabolic rate.
Article
Full-text available
There is a paucity of evidence assessing the efficacy of warm-up interventions with junior golfers. This study assessed the acute effects of warm-up protocols on junior golfers’ driving performance. In a randomised, repeated, counter-balanced design, fifteen junior golfers (age=14.77 years ± 2.08; hcp=7.57±6.53) undertook control, dynamic and RAMP (i.e. raise, activate, mobilise, potentiate) warm-up conditions, before club and ball metrics were recorded using a Trackman 4 launch monitor. Repeated measures ANOVAs found significant increases (p<0.05) in club head speed (CHS) (ηp²=.142), and significant decreases in launch angle (ηp²=.060), max height (ηp²=.436) and dispersion (ηp²=.126) for both conditions compared to control, indicative of a more penetrative ball flight and improved accuracy, however, significant differences between dynamic and RAMP conditions were not observed. Despite increased CHS, golfers were unable to translate this to increased ball speed, thus impacting upon distances achieved. In conclusion, both dynamic and RAMP warm-ups can have acute benefits on measures of golf drive performance in junior golfers. It is recommended that golfers work with Professional Golfers’ Association golf coaches and strength and conditioning coaches to assess all impact factor and ball flight metrics when aiming to integrate improvements to on course performance. Future research should also attempt to assess the translation of increased golf driving performance to strokes gained on the golf course with junior golfers.
Article
Hamada, Y, Akasaka, K, Otsudo, T, Sawada, Y, Hattori, H, Kikuchi, Y, and Hall, T. Golfers' performance is improved more by combining foam rolling and dynamic stretch to the lead hip than practice golf swinging. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2024—Warming up is considered effective in improving performance and preventing injury. Despite this, there have been few studies investigating warm-up programs in golf and whether specific factors contribute to improved performance. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of combined foam rolling and dynamic stretch (FR + DS) to the lead hip on golf swing performance, hip range of motion (ROM), and muscle strength in amateur golfers using a randomized crossover design. The study sample comprised 22 men (mean ± SD ; age, 32.6 ± 8.5 years, body mass index (BMI), 23.4 ± 2.7 kg·m ⁻² ). Subjects were assigned to receive either FR + DS or repetitive golf swing practice (SW) before crossing over to the other intervention for another day. Measurements included golf swing performance (ball speed, club head speed, flight distance [“carry”], spin rate, and launch angle), hip internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) ROM, as well as hip IR and ER muscle strength. Comparisons between groups were made before and after each intervention. For golf swing performance, FR + DS improved “carry” significantly more than SW ( p < 0.05). No significant differences in golf swing performance other than “carry” were found. In addition, IR ROM and IR muscle strength of the lead hip were significantly increased in the FR + DS group ( p < 0.05). FR + DS has effects on improving lead hip IR ROM and IR muscle strength, which may facilitate golfers' swing and “carry.” FR + DS shows promise as a warm-up method for amateur golfers who want to improve golf performance.
Article
A warm-up is an act of preparing yourself for physical activity. Every golfer performs a specific warm-up routine to enhance performance and to prevent himself from injuries. The physical demands required by the body to perform a round of golf are huge. Few hours before playing a round of golf has a great impact on performance. Evidence proves that different warm-up protocols have a great influence on golfing ground. Currently, there is no study conduct by Edu sing professional golfers to research the effect of pre-round warm-up routine on performance so, therefore, the purpose of this research is to assess the effect of pre-round warm-up routineonthreedifferentcomponentsofperformancesuchasaveragedriving distance, putting strokes, and regulations among golfers. Twenty male golfers divided into two groups experimental and control participated. The experiment group performed a proper pre-round warm-up routine for three consecutive days. The results showed that the participants of the experimental group who performed pre-round warmup routine, their average driving distance, greens in regulation, fairway in regulation increased and putting strokes decreasedduetowhichtheperformanceimproved. INTRODUCTION: Golf is a technical sport focusing on strategies, tactics and skills, however, there is a growing recognition of the physical requirements of the game and a clear increase in the focus on arousal regulation. It is a sport in which players use different clubs to hit the ball into different holes present in a series in a course in as few strokes as possible. This game is usually played in a course with the arrangement of 18 holes however some courses can be smaller, often having nine holes. Warm-up is the act of exercising and stretching in preparation of a body for strenuous activity. It is performed before training or practice and helps the athlete's body to prepare itself for physical activity and reduces the chance of injury. Pre round warm-up routine is a practice session before an actual round of golf which includes putting, chipping, bunker shots and range session. To access the speed and firmness of greens. Range session which fully prepares golfer to make their best swing for the opening tee shot. A pre-round warm-up routine is key to have peak performance in golf. The small difference between a good round and a great round is often called a pre-round warm-up routine. In this regard, the Pre round warm-up routine makes you confident before your round and to find out what type of swing you have going into the day.
Article
Full-text available
Golf is one of a few activities that people of all ages and skill level can play. Injury as with all sports can occur. The low back is the most common injury sustained whilst playing golf, and the dynamic action of the golf swing is a major contributing factor to injury. The golf swing is a complex movement that utilises the whole body in a coordinated fashion and when repeated frequently can result in injury. Injury can be overuse or traumatic in nature. Overuse injuries predominate in the professional golfer, and amateur golfer injury tends to occur secondary to an incorrect golf swing. Upper limb injuries are also common due to their role in linking the fast moving golf club with the power-generating torso. Fortunately, injury from a club or ball strike is rare. More common are the overuse injuries associated with the back, neck and shoulder. Most golf injury data have been collected retrospectively and further epidemiological study of a prospective nature is required to determine injury incidence and factor relating to the onset of injury.
Article
Full-text available
Flexibility measures can be static [end of ROM (range of motion)], dynamic-passive (stiffness/compliance) or dynamic-active (muscle contracted, stiffness/compliance). Dynamic measures of flexibility are less dependent on patient discomfort and are more objective. Acute and chronic changes in flexibility are likely to occur with stretching exercises, but it is difficult to distinguish between changes in stretch tolerance as opposed to changes in muscle stiffness. How flexibility is measured impacts these findings. There is no scientifically based prescription for flexibility training and no conclusive statements can be made about the relationship of flexibility to athletic injury. The literature reports opposing findings from different samples, frequently does not distinguish between strain, sprain and overuse injury, and rarely uses the proper denominator of exposure.There is basic scientific evidence to suggest that active warm-up may be protective against muscle strain injury but clinical research is equivocal on this point. Typically, specific flexibility patterns are associated with specific sports and even positions within sports. The relationship of flexibility to athletic performance is likely to be sport-dependent. Decreased flexibility has been associated with increased in-line running and walking economy. Increased stiffness may be associated with increased isometric and concentric force generation, and muscle energy storage may be best manifested by closely matching muscle stiffness to the frequency of movement in stretch-shorten type contractions.
Article
Full-text available
Unlabelled: A 1-year prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial of 70 postmenopausal women demonstrated that brief periods (<20 minutes) of a low-level (0.2g, 30 Hz) vibration applied during quiet standing can effectively inhibit bone loss in the spine and femur, with efficacy increasing significantly with greater compliance, particularly in those subjects with lower body mass. Introduction: Indicative of the anabolic potential of mechanical stimuli, animal models have demonstrated that short periods (<30 minutes) of low-magnitude vibration (<0.3g), applied at a relatively high frequency (20-90 Hz), will increase the number and width of trabeculae, as well as enhance stiffness and strength of cancellous bone. Here, a 1-year prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial in 70 women, 3-8 years past the menopause, examined the ability of such high-frequency, low-magnitude mechanical signals to inhibit bone loss in the human. Materials and methods: Each day, one-half of the subjects were exposed to short-duration (two 10-minute treatments/day), low-magnitude (2.0 m/s2 peak to peak), 30-Hz vertical accelerations (vibration), whereas the other half stood for the same duration on placebo devices. DXA was used to measure BMD at the spine, hip, and distal radius at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months. Fifty-six women completed the 1-year treatment. Results and conclusions: The detection threshold of the study design failed to show any changes in bone density using an intention-to-treat analysis for either the placebo or treatment group. Regression analysis on the a priori study group demonstrated a significant effect of compliance on efficacy of the intervention, particularly at the lumbar spine (p = 0.004). Posthoc testing was used to assist in identifying various subgroups that may have benefited from this treatment modality. Evaluating those in the highest quartile of compliance (86% compliant), placebo subjects lost 2.13% in the femoral neck over 1 year, whereas treatment was associated with a gain of 0.04%, reflecting a 2.17% relative benefit of treatment (p = 0.06). In the spine, the 1.6% decrease observed over 1 year in the placebo group was reduced to a 0.10% loss in the active group, indicating a 1.5% relative benefit of treatment (p = 0.09). Considering the interdependence of weight, the spine of lighter women (<65 kg), who were in the highest quartile of compliance, exhibited a relative benefit of active treatment of 3.35% greater BMD over 1 year (p = 0.009); for the mean compliance group, a 2.73% relative benefit in BMD was found (p = 0.02). These preliminary results indicate the potential for a noninvasive, mechanically mediated intervention for osteoporosis. This non-pharmacologic approach represents a physiologically based means of inhibiting the decline in BMD that follows menopause, perhaps most effectively in the spine of lighter women who are in the greatest need of intervention.
Article
Attempts to reduce or eliminate delayed-onset of muscle soreness are important as this condition is painful and debilitating. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of whole-body vibration (WBV) massage and stretching exercises at reducing perceived pain among untrained men. Sixteen adult men (age, 36.6 +/- 2.1 yr) volunteered to perform a strenuous exercise session consisting of resistance training and repeated sprints. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 recovery groups: a group performing WBV stretching sessions or a stretching group performing static stretching without vibration. Both groups performed similar stretches, twice per day for 3 days after the workout. The vibration group performed their stretches on the iTonic platform (frequency, 35 Hz; amplitude, 2 mm). Perceived pain was measured at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postworkout. Statistical analyses identified a significantly lower level of reported perceived pain at all postworkout measurement times among the WBV group (p < 0.05). No difference existed at the preworkout measurement time. The degree of attenuation of pain ranged from 22-61%. These data suggest that incorporating WBV as a recovery/regeneration tool may be effective for reducing the pain of muscle soreness and tightness after strenuous training.
Article
This study is an attempt to provide biomechanical sup port for the athletic practice of warming up prior to an exercise task to reduce the incidence of injury. Tears in isometrically preconditioned (stimulated before stretching) muscle were compared to tears in control (nonstimulated) muscle by examining four parameters: 1) force and 2) change of length required to tear the muscle, 3) site of failure, and 4) length-tension defor mation. The tibialis anterior (TA), the extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and flexor digitorum longus (EDL) mus cles from both hindlimbs of rabbits comprised our ex perimental model. Isometrically preconditioned TA (P < 0.001), EDL (P < 0.005), and FDL (P < 0.01) muscles required more force to fail than their contralateral controls. Precondi tioned TA (P < 0.05), EDL (P < 0.001), and FDL (P < 0.01) muscles also stretched to a greater length from rest before failing than their nonpreconditioned con trols. The site of failure in all of the muscles was the musculotendinous junction; thus, the site of failure was not altered by condition. The length-tension deforma tion curves for all three muscle types showed that in every case the preconditioned muscles attained a lesser force at each given increase in length before failure, showing a relative increase in elasticity, although only the EDL showed a statistically significant differ ence. From our data, it may be inferred that physiologic warming (isometric preconditioning) is of benefit in pre venting muscular injury by increasing the and length to failure and elasticity of the muscle-tendon unit.
Article
Competitive and recreational athletes typically perform warm-up and stretching activities to prepare for more strenuous exercise. These preliminary activities are used to enhance physical performance and to prevent sports-related injuries. Warm-up techniques are primarily used to increase body temperature and are classified in 3 major categories: (a) passive warm-up - increases temperature by some external means; (b) general warm-up - increases temperature by nonspecific body movements; and (c) specific warm-up - increases temperature using similar body parts that will be used in the subsequent, more strenuous activity. The best of these appears to be specific warm-up because this method provides a rehearsal of the activity or event. The intensity and duration of warm-up must be individualised according to the athlete's physical capabilities and in consideration of environmental factors which may alter the temperature response. The majority of the benefits of warm-up are related to temperature-dependent physiological processes. An elevation in body temperature produces an increase in the dissociation of oxygen from haemoglobin and myoglobin, a lowering of the activation energy rates of metabolic chemical reactions, an increase in muscle blood flow, a reduction in muscle viscosity, an increase in the sensitivity of nerve receptors, and an increase in the speed of nervous impulses. Warm-up also appears to reduce the incidence and likelihood of sports-related musculoskeletal injuries. Improving flexibility through stretching is another important preparatory activity that has been advocated to improve physical performance. Maintaining good flexibility also aids in the prevention of injuries to the musculoskeletal system. Flexibility is defined as the range of motion possible around a specific joint or a series of articulations and is usually classified as either static or dynamic. Static flexibility refers to the degree to which a joint can be passively moved to the end-points in the range of motion. Dynamic flexibility refers to the degree which a joint can be moved as a result of a muscle contraction and may therefore not be a good indicator of stiffness or looseness of a joint. There are 3 basic categories of stretching techniques: (a) ballistic--which makes use of repetitive bouncing movements; (b) static--which stretches the muscle to the point of slight muscle discomfort and is held for an extended period; and (c) proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation - which uses alternating contractions and stretching of the muscles. Each of these stretching methods is based on the neurophysiological phenomenon involving the stretch reflex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Article
In many situations of everyday life, vibration load occurs. Here whole body vibration in vehicles, such as boats, cars, helicopters and others as well as hand-transmitted vibration (motor saws etc.) can be named. As vibration is assumed liable to cause various threats to human health, a great number of studies in work science focussed on dose-effect relations and concepts for prevention. Although in many sports remarkable vibration load also occurs, there is very little research on the potential dangers and benefits of vibration stimuli, e.g. on whole body vibration and the implications for muscular activity and neuromuscular control in sport. In personal studies the damping behaviour and training effects under whole body vibration were investigated. Various research areas have been studied in order to approach the relevant topics: neuromuscular and posture control, energy metabolism in terms of oxygen uptake under whole body vibration and local concentration of phosphates by means of 31P-MRS. Furthermore the effects of a strength training under whole body vibration were analysed. The results underline that vibration is a neglected research topic in sport science from the preventive point of view as well as from the one focussing on the improvement of sport performance.
Article
The aim of this study was to investigate and to compare the effect of a 12-wk period of whole-body vibration training and resistance training on human knee-extensor strength. Sixty-seven untrained females (21.4 +/- 1.8 yr) participated in the study. The whole-body vibration group (WBV, N = 18) and the placebo group (PL, N = 19) performed static and dynamic knee-extensor exercises on a vibration platform. The acceleration of the vibration platform was between 2.28 g and 5.09 g, whereas only 0.4 g for the PL condition. Vibration (35-40 Hz) resulted in increased EMG activity, but the EMG signal remained unchanged in the PL condition. The resistance-training group (RES, N = 18) trained knee extensors by dynamic leg-press and leg-extension exercises (10-20 RM). All training groups exercised 3x wk-1. The control group (CO, N = 12) did not participate in any training. Pre- and postisometric, dynamic, and ballistic knee-extensor strength were measured by means of a motor-driven dynamometer. Explosive strength was determined by means of a counter-movement jump. Isometric and dynamic knee-extensor strength increased significantly (P < 0.001) in both the WBV group (16.6 +/- 10.8%; 9.0 +/- 3.2%) and the RES group (14.4 +/- 5.3%; 7.0 +/- 6.2%), respectively, whereas the PL and CO group showed no significant (P > 0.05) increase. Counter-movement jump height enhanced significantly (P < 0.001) in the WBV group (7.6 +/- 4.3%) only. There was no effect of any of the interventions on maximal speed of movement, as measured by means of ballistic tests. WBV, and the reflexive muscle contraction it provokes, has the potential to induce strength gain in knee extensors of previously untrained females to the same extent as resistance training at moderate intensity. It was clearly shown that strength increases after WBV training are not attributable to a placebo effect.
Article
To test whether training on a high-frequency (28Hz) vibrating platform improves muscle power and bone characteristics in postmenopausal women. Randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up. Outpatient clinic in a general hospital in Italy. Twenty-nine postmenopausal women (intervention group, n=14; matched controls, n=15). Participants stood on a ground-based oscillating platform for three 2-minute sessions for a total of 6 minutes per training session, twice weekly for 6 months. The controls did not receive any training. Both groups were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Muscle power, calculated from ground reaction forces produced by landing after jumping as high as possible on a forceplate, cortical bone density, and biomarkers of bone turnover. Over 6 months, muscle power improved by about 5% in women who received the intervention, and it remained unchanged in controls (P=.004). Muscle force remained stable in both the intervention and control groups. No significant changes were observed in bone characteristics. Reflex muscular contractions induced by vibration training improve muscle power in postmenopausal women.