Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behavior: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182, E216-E225

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Canadian Medical Association Journal (Impact Factor: 5.96). 03/2010; 182(5):E216-25. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090578
Source: PubMed


The opportunity to improve care using computer reminders is one of the main incentives for implementing sophisticated clinical information systems. We conducted a systematic review to quantify the expected magnitude of improvements in processes of care from computer reminders delivered to clinicians during their routine activities.
We searched the MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases (to July 2008) and scanned the bibliographies of retrieved articles. We included studies in our review if they used a randomized or quasi-randomized design to evaluate improvements in processes or outcomes of care from computer reminders delivered to physicians during routine electronic ordering or charting activities.
Among the 28 trials (reporting 32 comparisons) included in our study, we found that computer reminders improved adherence to processes of care by a median of 4.2% (interquartile range [IQR] 0.8%-18.8%). Using the best outcome from each study, we found that the median improvement was 5.6% (IQR 2.0%-19.2%). A minority of studies reported larger effects; however, no study characteristic or reminder feature significantly predicted the magnitude of effect except in one institution, where a well-developed, "homegrown" clinical information system achieved larger improvements than in all other studies (median 16.8% [IQR 8.7%-26.0%] v. 3.0% [IQR 0.5%-11.5%]; p = 0.04). A trend toward larger improvements was seen for reminders that required users to enter a response (median 12.9% [IQR 2.7%-22.8%] v. 2.7% [IQR 0.6%-5.6%]; p = 0.09).
Computer reminders produced much smaller improvements than those generally expected from the implementation of computerized order entry and electronic medical record systems. Further research is required to identify features of reminder systems consistently associated with clinically worthwhile improvements.

Download full-text


Available from: Alain Mayhew
  • Source
    • "However, without effective facilitation of the implementation of CPGs, they have limited effect (Grimshaw et al., 2004). Computerized support is a means which may enhance implementation (Eccles & Grimshaw, 2004); for example, computer reminders have been studied as vehicles for medication adherence, with varying effect on clinical outcomes (Mistry et al., 2015), and reminders in electronic patient records (EPR) are suggested as a feasible approach to alert health professionals to CPGs (Livesey & Noon, 2007;Malhotra, Singh, & Brook, 2012).While particular studies have shown that computer reminders had small to moderate benefits for patient outcomes (Shojania et al., 2010), further research is needed on what makes computer reminders work or not, why, and in what context (Randell, Greenhalgh, & Dowding, 2015). A cluster-randomized controlled study on the effects of computer reminders on guideline implementation was conducted in a pediatric university hospital in Sweden; the Reminder Implementation for Safety in Child Care (RISCC) project. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Clinical practical guidelines (CPGs) may enhance evidence-based practice, but require implementation. Computer reminders have previously shown various effects in supporting implementation; in a concomitant study, we found no effect on complications in peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) or registered nurses' (RNs) adherence to a CPG in pediatric care. Yet, there is a need to determine how reminders operate in particular contexts. Aim: To depict if, in what context, and how computer reminders regarding evidence-based management of PVC in pediatric care are applied according to RNs' actions and experience. Methods: Qualitative data from nonparticipant observations and interviews with 18 RNs in four intervention units at a pediatric hospital were analyzed with content analysis. Findings: Attention given to the computer reminders varied; the RNs noticed them in units where there was an agreement about the management and recording of PVCs, but not elsewhere. Rather, computer reminders did not facilitate adherence to the PVC-CPG where the CPG was not acknowledged from the start. RNs who knew how to manage PVCs had peer support and received additional reminders, which suggested that the computer reminders added to the significance of PVCs in pediatric care. Linking evidence to action: While the computer reminders alone did not support CPG implementation, they further increased the attention to PVCs in contexts where there was a readiness to change along with a supportive culture. We suggest further studies tailoring implementation strategies to include electronic means if there is a beneficial context.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
  • Source
    • "When delivered outside clinical consultations and at the population-level, they are are typically described as audit and feedback (A&F). Systematic reviews of both types of intervention suggest they are moderately effective at ensuring patients receive improved care [3] [4] [5]. However, the reviews also suggest interventions are highly variable: sometimes the interventions work very well, and sometimes they do not [3– 5]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many patients do not receive care consistent with best practice. Health informatics interventions often attempt to address this problem by comparing care provided to patients (e.g., from electronic health record data) to quality standards (e.g., described in clinical guidelines) and feeding this information back to clinicians. Traditionally these interventions are delivered at the patient-level as computerized clinical decision support (CDS) or at the population level as audit and feedback (A&F). Both CDS and A&F can improve care for patients but are variably effective; the challenge is to understand how the efficacy can be maximized. Although CDS and A&F are traditionally considered separate approaches, we argue that the systems share common mechanisms, and efficacy may be improved by cross-fertilizing relevant features and concepts. We draw on the Health Informatics and Implementation Science literature to argue that common mechanisms include functions typically associated with the other system, in addition to other features that may prove fruitful for further research.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · Studies in health technology and informatics
  • Source
    • "Several different types of intervention studies have been conducted in an effort to improve prescription adequacy in clinical practice. These can be grouped into three major types of intervention: 1) feedback or audits [19], in which information about clinical practice is a posteriori; 2) alerts or reminders [20], which suggest an action such as preventive care at the time of the patient visit or a priori; and 3) clinical decision support systems (CDSS) [21], which are more complex systems that guide practitioners and provide recommendations on clinical decisions to be made, based on information added to the clinical record. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Although hypercholesterolemia is considered a cardiovascular risk factor, in isolation it is not necessarily sufficient cause for a cardiovascular event. To improve event prediction, cardiovascular risk calculators have been developed; the REGICOR calculator has been validated for use in our population. The objective of this project is to develop an intervention with general practitioners (GPs) and evaluate its impact on prescription adequacy of cholesterol-lowering drugs in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and in controlling the costs associated with this disease. Methods This nonblinded, cluster-randomized clinical trial analyzes data from primary care electronic medical records (ECAP) and other databases. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 35 to 74 years with no known cardiovascular disease and a new prescription for cholesterol-lowering drugs during the 2-year study period. Dependent variables include the following: RETIRA, defined as new cholesterol-lowering drugs initiated during the year preceding the intervention, considered inadequate, and withdrawn during the study period; EVITA, defined as new cholesterol-lowering drugs initiated during the study period and considered inadequate; COST, defined as the total cost of inadequate new treatments prescribed; and REGISTER, defined as the recording of cardiovascular risk factors. Independent variables include the GP’s quality-of-care indicators and randomly assigned study group (intervention vs control), patient demographics, and clinical variables. Aggregated descriptive analysis will be done at the GP level and multilevel analysis will be performed to estimate the intervention effect, adjusted for individual and GP variables. Discussion The study objective is to generate evidence about the effectiveness of implementing feedback information programs directed to GPs in the context of Primary Care. The goal is to improve the prescription adequacy of lipid-lowering therapies for primary prevention. Trial registration Identifier: NCT01997671. November 28, 2013.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · BMC Family Practice
Show more