Article

Pseudoneoplastic Lesions of the Female Genital Tract

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (Impact Factor: 2.84). 03/2010; 134(3):393-403. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165-134.3.393
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Numerous benign, proliferative, or reactive processes, often related to hormone stimulation or inflammation, occur throughout the female genital tract and may mimic benign or malignant tumors. Several of the more common pseudoneoplastic lesions are discussed in this article, including microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix mimicking well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma, reactive epithelial changes in the fallopian tubes mimicking adenocarcinoma or carcinoma in situ, and pregnancy changes in the ovary including pregnancy luteoma and large solitary luteinized follicular cyst of pregnancy and puerperium that may mimic ovarian neoplasms.
To discuss and illustrate several common lesions of the female genital tract that mimic neoplasms.
Material derived from consultation cases and review of the literature.
Many benign hyperplastic or reactive processes that occur in the female genital tract may be mistaken for neoplasms both clinically and pathologically. Awareness of the features of such lesions will aid in their correct diagnosis and prevent overtreatment of benign processes.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HPV-induced alterations of the uterine cervix are frequently biopsied because of suspicious findings on a Pap smear and/or colposcopy. Precancerous lesions occur at the so called transformation zone. For those representing squamous differentiation, the traditional three-tier grading system in CIN 1 to 3 is used. CIN 1 and CIN 2 represent (spontaneous) regression in 60-90% and 50%, respectively. In CIN 3 lesions progression is seen in 20-50%. For appropriate grading, improvement of inter- and intraobserver correlation as well as the exclusion of non-precancerous lesions, p16 immunohistochemistry might be helpful. The terms endocervical glandular dysplasia and low-grade glandular intraepithelial neoplasia have been suggested for glandular lesions less than adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Until now reproducible histological criteria have not been established. Additional studies using HPV analysis, p16 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry have not been proved for these lesions. In accordance with international consensus meetings, these diagnostic terms are not recommended for use in practice. AIS, characterised by the replacement of glandular epithelium by cytologically malignant cells, has been established as the precancerous lesion of the endocervix. AIS is much less common than CIN 3 with a reported range of 1:50-100. But, AIS is found in association with CIN 3 with 25-75%. The differential diagnosis between AIS and non-neoplastic glandular lesion may be aided by immunohistochemistry (e.g. p16, Ki-67, bcl-2, vimentin). All specimens obtained after the clinical diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions should be examined using step sectioning to rule out microinvasive growth. Important information for clinicians includes the quality of the specimen (cautery artefacts, transformation zone enclosed within the probe), exact grading of CIN lesions, identification of other lesions responsible for suspicious findings of a Pap smear or at colposcopy, and in the case of conisation the distance of the lesion from the resection margins (endo- and ectocervical and circumferential margin).
    No preview · Article · Sep 2011 · Der Pathologe
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This overview summarizes pathogenetic and practical aspects of (sub-)classification of cervical glandular (pre-)neoplasias and, inter alia, calls into question the usefulness of grading. In the context of the differential diagnosis of benign "imitations", the phenotypic variability of glandular precancerous lesions and carcinomas is described as well as the use of special tests to distinguish them. With regard to carcinomas, the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated neoplasias is addressed including "minimal deviation" adenocarcinoma (MDA, malignant adenoma), carcinomas with endometrioid or villoglandular morphology, and mesonephric hyper- and neoplasias. Furthermore, knowledge of HPV-negative glandular (pre-)neoplasias is covered including "gastric-type" adenocarcinomas and diagnostic algorithms for discriminating between primary and secondary cervical adenocarcinomas. Finally, comments are offered on the difficulties in recognizing early invasive adenocarcinomas, especially also the pitfalls inherent in determining the depth of invasion.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2011 · Der Pathologe
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This overview summarizes pathogenetic and practical aspects of (sub-)classification of cervical glandular (pre-)neoplasias and, inter alia, calls into question the usefulness of grading. In the context of the differential diagnosis of benign “imitations”, the phenotypic variability of glandular precancerous lesions and carcinomas is described as well as the use of special tests to distinguish them. With regard to carcinomas, the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated neoplasias is addressed including “minimal deviation” adenocarcinoma (MDA, malignant adenoma), carcinomas with endometrioid or villoglandular morphology, and mesonephric hyper- and neoplasias. Furthermore, knowledge of HPV-negative glandular (pre-)neoplasias is covered including “gastric-type” adenocarcinomas and diagnostic algorithms for discriminating between primary and secondary cervical adenocarcinomas. Finally, comments are offered on the difficulties in recognizing early invasive adenocarcinomas, especially also the pitfalls inherent in determining the depth of invasion.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2011 · Der Pathologe
Show more

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on ResearchGate. Read our cookies policy to learn more.