Personal Responsibility And Obesity: A Constructive Approach To A Controversial Issue

Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Departments of Psychology and Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.97). 03/2010; 29(3):379-87. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739
Source: PubMed


The concept of personal responsibility has been central to social, legal, and political approaches to obesity. It evokes language of blame, weakness, and vice and is a leading basis for inadequate government efforts, given the importance of environmental conditions in explaining high rates of obesity. These environmental conditions can override individual physical and psychological regulatory systems that might otherwise stand in the way of weight gain and obesity, hence undermining personal responsibility, narrowing choices, and eroding personal freedoms. Personal responsibility can be embraced as a value by placing priority on legislative and regulatory actions such as improving school nutrition, menu labeling, altering industry marketing practices, and even such controversial measures as the use of food taxes that create healthier defaults, thus supporting responsible behavior and bridging the divide between views based on individualistic versus collective responsibility.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "The obesity epidemic has also made obesity and the related health risks and the costs they are likely to induce for the health care system a constant topic in the public eye. Thus, obesity is now visible not only in contention with the thin beauty ideal, but also with health norms, which currently (quite unduly) emphasize the self-control (or the lack of if) on the part of the obese[31]. Yet another viewpoint to the studied phenomena was achieved by Bdecomposing^ the growth trajectories down into panel to panel changes using difference scores. Although the method employing simple differences is a rather crude one and the results need to be viewed only as suggestive, at face value, these analyses added some new insights to our findings. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study examined the developmental trajectories of self-esteem and body mass index (BMI) from adolescence to mid-adulthood and the way the association between self-esteem and BMI changed during a 26-year follow-up. Methods: Participants of a Finnish cohort study in 1983 at 16 years (N = 2194) were followed up at ages 22 (N = 1656), 32 (N = 1471), and 42 (N = 1334) using postal questionnaires. Measures at each time point covered self-esteem and self-reported weight and height. Analyses were done using latent growth curve models (LGM) and difference scores. Results: In LGM analyses among females both the initial levels (r = -0.13) and slopes (r = -0.26) of the self-esteem and BMI trajectories correlated negatively. Among males, there were no significant correlations between self-esteem and BMI growth factors. The association between increasing BMI and decreasing self-esteem among females was strongest between ages 22 and 32 (r = -0.16), while among males, increases in BMI and self-esteem correlated positively (r = 0.11) during that period. Among females, cross-sectional correlations between self-esteem and BMI showed an increasing trend (p < 0.001) from age 16 (r = -0.07) to age 42 (r = -0.17), whereas among males negative correlation (r = -0.08) emerged only in mid-adulthood at age 42. Conclusion: Among females, higher and increasing BMI is associated with lower and more slowly increasing self-esteem. This association is not restricted to adolescent years but persists and gets stronger in mid-adulthood. Among males, associations are weaker but indicate more age-related differences. The results highlight the need for interventions that tackle weight-related stigma and discrimination, especially among women with higher body weight and size.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • Source
    • "Two of the most important words in the United States' national discourse about obesity are 'personal responsibility' (Brownell et al., 2010). The promotion of personal health responsibility has in part grown in popularity as it is seen as a less politically sensitive approach than other potential government interventions such as regulation of the food industry (Brownell et al., 2010). A focus on personal health puts the consumer in control by providing them with the tools to make appropriate food and lifestyle choices. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article advances our understanding of sustainable consumption by focusing on the emerging concept of consumer responsibility for sustainable consumption (CRSC). Employing a recent scale of consumer’s ‘felt responsibility’ for sustainable consumption, we begin with the results of an empirical study intended to determine how CRSC relates to the established sustainable consumption attitude–behaviour gap. Guided by the insight gained from these results, we proceed with exploring a broader, multidimensional conceptualisation of CRSC by synthesising research from a variety of domains and perspectives. Our hope is that this exploration will inspire additional dialogue about the nature of CRSC, as well as enable development of a more refined scale to enable subsequent research. We believe that this, in turn, will promote future research and inform practice as our collective understanding of this important consumer construct continues to evolve.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Journal of Marketing Management
  • Source
    • "Sectors including agriculture, marketing, industry, and government influence the food environment , and are set within social and cultural norms and values. Domestic nutrition research in high-income countries uses the ecological approach to diet and health outcomes routinely , and describes the role the food environment plays in food choices and nutrition transitions (Popkin et al. 2005; Larson and Story 2009; Swinburn et al. 2011; Wansink 2010; Drewnowski et al. 2013; Brownell et al. 2010). In international nutrition research and advocacy, the food environment has been considered to a lesser extent. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The food environment in markets constrains and signals consumers what to purchase. It encompasses availability , affordability, convenience, and desirability of various foods. The effect of income on dietary consumption is always modified by the food environment. Many agricultural interventions aim to improve incomes, increase food availability and reduce food prices. Their effects on nutrition could be better understood if food environment measures helped to explain how additional income is likely to be spent, and how food availability and prices change as a result of large-scale interventions. Additionally, measurement of the food environment could elucidate food access gaps and inform the design of nutrition-sensitive interventions. This paper reviews existing measures of the food environment, and then draws from these tools to suggest ways the food environment could be measured in future studies and monitoring.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Food Security
Show more