ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

Caffeine intake is so common that its pharmacological effects on the mind are undervalued. Since it is so readily available, individuals can adjust their own dose, time of administration and dose intervals of caffeine, according to the perceived benefits and side effects of each dose. This review focuses on human studies of caffeine in subjects with and without psychiatric disorders. Besides the possibility of mild drug dependence, caffeine may bring benefits that contribute to its widespread use. These benefits seem to be related to adaptation of mental energy to the context by increasing alertness, attention, and cognitive function (more evident in longer or more difficult tasks or situations of low arousal) and by elevating mood. Accordingly, moderate caffeine intake (< 6 cups/day) has been associated with less depressive symptoms, fewer cognitive failures, and lower risk of suicide. However, its putative therapeutic effects on depression and ADHD have been insufficiently studied. Conversely, in rare cases high doses of caffeine can induce psychotic and manic symptoms, and more commonly, anxiety. Patients with panic disorder and performance social anxiety disorder seem to be particularly sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of caffeine, whereas preliminary data suggests that it may be effective for some patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The threshold for the anxiogenic effect of caffeine is influenced by a polymorphism of the A2A receptor. In summary, caffeine can be regarded as a pharmacological tool to increase energy and effortful behavior in daily activities. More populational (cross-sectional and prospective) and experimental studies are necessary to establish the role of caffeine intake in psychiatric disorders, especially its putative efficacy on depressive mood and cognitive/attentional disorders.
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 20 (2010) S239–S248 S239
DOI 10.3233/JAD-2010-1378
IOS Press
Review Article
Caffeine, Mental Health, and Psychiatric
Disorders
Diogo R. Lara
Faculdade de Biociˆ
encias, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract. Caffeine intake is so common that its pharmacological effects on the mind are undervalued. Since it is so readily
available, individuals can adjust their own dose, time of administration and dose intervals of caffeine, according to the perceived
benefits and side effects of each dose. This review focuses on human studies of caffeine in subjects with and without psychiatric
disorders. Besides the possibility of mild drug dependence, caffeine may bring benefits that contribute to its widespread use.
These benefits seem to be related to adaptation of mental energy to the context by increasing alertness, attention, and cognitive
function (more evident in longer or more difficult tasks or situations of low arousal) and by elevating mood. Accordingly,
moderate caffeine intake (<6 cups/day) has been associated with less depressive symptoms, fewer cognitive failures, and lower
risk of suicide. However, its putative therapeutic effects on depression and ADHD have been insufficiently studied. Conversely,
in rare cases high doses of caffeine caninduce psychotic and manic symptoms, and more commonly, anxiety. Patients with panic
disorder and performance social anxiety disorder seem to be particularly sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of caffeine, whereas
preliminary data suggests that it may be effective for some patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The threshold
for the anxiogenic effect of caffeine is influenced by a polymorphism of the A2A receptor. In summary, caffeine can be regarded
as a pharmacological tool to increase energy and effortful behavior in daily activities. More populational (cross-sectional and
prospective) and experimental studies are necessary to establish the role of caffeine intake in psychiatric disorders, especially its
putative efficacy on depressive mood and cognitive/attentional disorders.
Keywords: Attention, anxiety, caffeine, cognition, depression, mood
INTRODUCTION
Caffeine is so widely consumed in the world that
little attention is paid to the fact that about 80% of the
population voluntarily and routinely manipulate their
mind pharmacologically. Such widespread use sug-
gests that caffeine has at least some reinforcing effect
and that it is well tolerated in habitual doses. Also,
being readily available at a low cost and with high so-
cial acceptance and incentive, at least compared to oth-
er available drugs, individuals can easily adjust their
own dose, time of administration, and dose intervals of
Correspondenceto:DiogoR.Lara,FaculdadedeBiociˆencias
PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681 Pd12A, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
90619-900. Fax: +55 51 33203612; E-mail: drlara@pucrs.br.
caffeine intake accordingto the perceived benefits and
side effects of each dose.
Caffeine can be obtained from coffee, tea, ener-
gy drinks, soft drinks, chocolate, and over-the-counter
medications. Although many other compounds are
present, caffeine seems to be the most important men-
tally active substance in them [1,2]. For this reason,
coffee consumptionwill be regardedas a proxy for caf-
feine intake in this review. Studies in which caffeine
was acutely administered at much higher doses than
routine use (i.e., over 300 mg), will receive lower em-
phasis, since regular caffeinated drinks have between
40 and 150 mg per serving, although the amount of
coffee (and caffeine) per serving may be getting higher
in some countries [3].
Even at somewhat larger doses, the effects of caf-
feine are ascribed to its antagonistic properties at A1
ISSN 1387-2877/10/$27.50 2010 IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
S240 D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry
and A2A adenosine receptors [4,5]. However, both
A1 and A2A receptors interact with other neurotrans-
mitters and proteins. Of particular relevance for this
review, antagonism of A2A receptors increases neuro-
transmission through dopamine D2 receptors, and an-
tagonism of A1 receptors interacts with D1 receptors
and regulates the release of neurotransmitters such as
dopamine, glutamate, and acetylcholine [4,5].
The objective of this article is to review the effects
of caffeine on mood, cognition, and behavior of nor-
mal volunteers and in patients with different psychi-
atric disorders. This was not a systematic review and
articles published in the last 10 years were emphasized.
The role of adenosine in psychiatric disorders and the
effects of specific adenosine antagonists will not be the
focus of this review and can be found elsewhere [6,
7]. As a warning note, psychiatric disorders have not
been validated as distinct or categorical disorders, i.e.
they are often “comorbid”, can be regarded as the ex-
treme of dimensional features, and may share genet-
ic and environmental risk factors [8]. This scenario
arises from a diagnostic strategy based exclusively on
symptoms, the lack of specific diagnostic markers, and
a fragmented view of the mindthat disregards the close
interactions between personality, mood, behavior, and
cognition. However, categorical concepts of such dis-
orders as in ICD10 and DSM-IV are adopted in prac-
tice and in the scientific literature, so both dimensional
and categorical approaches will be considered in this
review.
GENERAL PSYCHOTROPICEFFECTS OF
CAFFEINE
Caffeine has “mental activating” properties, increas-
ingalertness and energy andreducingsleepinessand fa-
tigue (for reviews see [1,4,9]). These effects contribute
to increased performance in some contexts, being par-
ticularly apparent in situations of low alertness, such as
early morning, sleep deprivation, and when sustained
performance is demanded.
At higher doses, especially in sensitive individuals,
caffeine can induce symptoms of a condition called
“caffeinism” such as anxiety, restlessness, nervousness,
dysphoria, insomnia, excitement, psychomotor agita-
tion, and rambling flow of thought and speech [10,11],
mimicking a clinical picture known as mixed mood
state. On the other hand, caffeine withdrawal may
cause headache, fatigue or drowsiness, anxiety, and de-
pressive symptoms that peak 1–2 days after cessation
of intake and may persist for a week [12,13]. Some in-
dividuals show clear caffeine dependenceas evidenced
by withdrawal symptoms, persistent desire or unsuc-
cessful efforts to cut down or control use, and toler-
ance [14]. Abstinence is accompanied by increased
cerebral blood velocity and increased EEG theta and
decreased beta 2 power [15]. Thus, caffeine has mild
to moderate reinforcing effects and has a “therapeutic
window” of psychostimulant properties that may bring
about some benefit. In contrast to other drugs with
dependence potential, caffeine is clearly devoid of im-
portant negative consequences on health, performance,
and social adjustment [16,17]. Specifically for mental
health, in the general population caffeine intake was
moderately associated with risk for a wide range of
psychiatric and substance use disorders, but not as a
causal factor [17]. Familial factors, likely in part ge-
netic, seem to predispose to both caffeine intake and
the risk for psychiatric disorders.
Of note, positive effects of caffeine are highlighted
when the study design favors the reversal of short term
withdrawal, which has not been consistently controlled
for in many studies [18]. Some studies with low doses
of caffeine (50–100 mg) suggest that most effects are
due to withdrawal reversion in regular users [19,20].
However, other studies in volunteers without caffeine
withdrawal, either by long term abstinence or ongoing
caffeine use, showed significant effects of caffeine on
performance, alertness, and mood [21–23]. Moreover,
a recent study [24] found that in light, nondependent
caffeine users (mean 116 mg/week) caffeine produced
increased energy,vigour, and arousal and less fatigue at
150 mg, but not 50 mg. Anxiety increased with 450 mg
but not with 150 mg or 50 mg. Caffeine also failed
to produce reinforcing effects of “liking” and “wanting
more” at any dose, contrary to d-amphetamine.
The effects of caffeine have mostly been studied us-
ing a single large dose, which contrasts with repeated
use of smaller doses over a longer time period. How-
ever,Brice and Smith [25,26] found that the improved
mood and enhanced performanceafter a single dose of
200 mg were also present with four doses of 65 mg
given at hourly intervals.
SPECIFIC EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE
Mood and mood disorders
Healthy and pathological mood involve internalized
symptoms such as sadness, anhedonia, apathy, and
D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry S241
anxiety as well as externalized manifestations such as
overactivity, euphoria, irritability, and high pleasure-
oriented behavior. Overall, caffeine has been shown
both to induce mood changes, particularly at higher
doses, and to protect from mood symptoms at moderate
doses.
Caffeine has been classically regardedas an inducer
of anxiety at higher doses, typically over 300 mg [10,
24,27,28], but the consumption of caffeine is poorly
correlated with anxiety oranxiety traits [17,29,30]. Be-
sides dosage, the anxiogenic effect of caffeine is influ-
enced by individual factors, such as preference for caf-
feine, presence of some anxiety disorders, and genetic
background.
Regarding preference, individuals who prefer caf-
feine pills over placebo tend to report stimulant and
"positive" mood effects of caffeine, whereas those that
choose placebo tend to ascribe aversive effects after
caffeine (increased anxiety and dysphoria) [31]. Sim-
ilarly, caffeine only had significant reinforcing, mood,
and psychomotor performance effects in caffeine con-
sumers, although caffeine increased self-rated alertness
of both caffeine consumers and non-consumers [32].
Haskell et al. [33] found that caffeine tended to ben-
efit consumers’ mood more, while improving perfor-
mance more in non-consumers. Doses of 50–100 mg
of caffeine are usually sufficient to induce mood effects
and in some individuals the effect of 20–30 mg is still
clearly noticeable [34].
The presence of specific anxiety disorders influences
the perceived effects of caffeine. Earlier studies have
found higher sensitivity to anxiogenic effects of high
dose caffeine (typically higher than 400 mg) in pa-
tients with panic disorder [35,36], generalized anxiety
disorder [37], and to a lesser extent in depressed pa-
tients [38]. More recent studies extended these find-
ings to patients with performance social anxiety dis-
order, but not generalized social anxiety disorder [39],
and to first degree relatives of patients with panic dis-
order [40]. Also, patients with panic disorder who de-
velop caffeine-induced panic attacks have significantly
higher non-specific general psychopathology [41]. In
contrast, a recent randomized controlled trial showed
that caffeine led to clinical response in 7 out of 12
patients with treatment-resistant obsessive compulsive
disorder (OCD) and a 55% reduction of symptom
score in these responders, which was comparable to
d-amphetamine [42]. It should be noted that OCD, al-
though classified as an anxiety disorder, is more relat-
ed to control of thought and behavior than to fear and
worry, as other anxiety disorders.
The genetic basis for the anxiogenic effects of caf-
feine has been investigated. Individuals with the
1976T/T genotypes for A2A adenosine receptors re-
ported greater increases in anxiety after caffeine ad-
ministration than the other genotypic groups [43,44].
This genotype (also referred to as 1083 C>T) was as-
sociated with less caffeine intake [45] as well as with
blood-injury phobia [46] and panic disorder in western
population [47,48], but not in Asians [49,50].
Thus, vulnerability to marked anxiogenic effects of
caffeine seems to be restricted to some individualswith
at least a predisposition for specific anxiety disorders,
and is influenced by genetic and ethnic factors and
higher levels of psychopathology.
Conversely, caffeine intake at low doses can also re-
duce anxiety and elevate mood in humans [33,51–54].
Caffeine cessation over a couple of days may increase
anxiety and depression scores in about 10% of volun-
teers with a moderate daily intake (mean 235 mg per
day), and lead to headache in about 50% of volun-
teers [55]. Also, in one of the few population studies
on regular caffeine intake, Smith [56] has shown that
consumption of caffeine, even at low doses, was asso-
ciated with a reduced risk of depression (OR =0.32,
CI 0.2–0.5; OR =0.18, CI 0.1–0.3 and OR =0.12,
CI 0.1–0.2 for 1–140 mg/day, 141–260 mg/day and >
260 mg/day, respectively, compared to those with no
caffeine intake). This study was conducted in a non-
working population, which may have higher baseline
levels of depression, probably making it easier to iden-
tify this effect compared to a working population.
Regarding suicide, uses of coffee and tea were asso-
ciated with a lower risk at higher intake (relative risk
per cup of coffee per day =0.87, 95% confidence in-
terval =0.77 to 0.98) [16]. Also, a significant in-
verse association was reported between moderate cof-
fee drinking (2–6 cups/day) and the risk of suicide [57].
However, another study suggests that caffeine has a J-
shaped relationship with suicide [58]: a similar trend
was found for lower suicide rates at low and moderate
doses but suicide was significantly increased in those
who take 8 or more cups of coffee/day. This pattern
is mimicked by the dose response trend to improved
performance in those who take around 400 mg caffeine
per day regularly.
Adenosine has been hypothesized to mediate the
rapid onset antidepressant effects of sleep depriva-
tion [59]. If this were the case, caffeine may be delete-
rious to depressed patients undergoing such treatment.
However,caffeine(150mg three times overnight)failed
to affect mood improvement in the next day of sleep
S242 D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry
deprivation [60]. The only observed effect was lack of
decreased energy during sleep deprivation, suggesting
that adenosine is not involved in the therapeutic antide-
pressanteffectsof caffeine,and that caffeine intake may
make it easier for patients to undergo the procedure of
depriving from sleep.
A few case reports have also suggestedthat caffeine
can induce mania [61] and that excessive caffeine in-
take may hamper the recoveryof patients with bipolar
disorder or manic-type mood episodes [62–64]. These
observations are in line with both its psychostimulant
and antidepressant effects. Of relevance for mania,
caffeine can increase elation in healthy volunteers at
250 mg and irritability at higher doses (500 mg) [65].
Moreover, highcoffee intake was associated with suici-
dal behavior in patients with bipolar disorder, although
causality cannot be established with the transversal de-
sign of this study [66] and the lack of genetic control, as
performed by Kendler et al. [17]. Expert opinions and
guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder recom-
mend discontinuation of caffeine intake as one of the
first steps in the treatment of mania [67,68], although
no systematic study is cited. These are important obser-
vations, but given the widespread use of caffeine by the
general population and patients with psychiatric disor-
ders, these few case reports suggest that problematic
use of caffeine is quite an exception rather than the rule.
Based on the data reviewed here and clinical experi-
ence, the most conservative approach is that high caf-
feine intake should be avoided in patients with bipolar
disorder, especially during manic or mixed episodes,
but complete abstinence may also be detrimental. In
most patients, low to moderate intake of caffeine is
probably not harmful and may play a role against de-
pressive symptoms. However, this topic needs further
study.
In summary, for mood and anxiety disorders, caf-
feine may have beneficial effects for depressive or low
energy states, and may be detrimental for some hyper-
sensitive patients with panic and/or performance anx-
iety disorder, as well as for patients with bipolar dis-
order. However, total abstinence is unlikely to lead to
significant improvement in patients with low to mod-
erate caffeine intake, and may be detrimental to others
with predominant depressive symptomatology.
Psychosis and schizophrenia
Case reports also support the idea that caffeine may
induce psychotic symptoms in some individuals with-
out previous psychotic disorders [69–71]. Howev-
er, this may result from an exacerbation of underly-
ing paranoid traits. Also, reduction of caffeine in-
take has been associated with symptom improvement
in some cases of patients with psychotic disorders [71–
73], and in a hospital setting with patients suffering
from chronic schizophrenia [74]. However, other stud-
ies did not find significant differences when caffeine
intake was restricted in patients with schizophrenia [75,
76]. Lucas et al. [77] tested patients with chronic
schizophrenia with 10 mg/kg, which led to increased
psychosis, thought disorder, unusual thought content,
and euphoria-activation. In these patients, anxiety was
not increased by caffeine, which may be particular to
patients with schizophrenia, but may also be related to
concurrent treatment with antipsychotics.
Despite this suspected induction or exacerbation of
psychotic symptoms, some reports have shown that caf-
feine intake may be higher in patients with schizophre-
nia, or at least in a subgroup of them[75,78]. This high
intake is at least partially associated with the excessive
cigarette smoking often observed in these patients [79,
80]. The role of these drugs in schizophrenia remains
to be elucidated. One hypothesis is that nicotine may
be used as self-medication since it corrects sensory
gating deficits found in schizophrenia [81]. However,
the xanthines, theophylline and caffeine, were found
to induce such alterations in normal volunteers [82,
83]. Other possibilities to be further studied are that
caffeine may improve negative and cognitive symp-
toms and motor side effects of antipsychotics, which
may contribute to high intake of caffeine by some pa-
tients with schizophrenia. Interestingly, subchronic
treatment with caffeine attenuates cognitive deficits in-
duced by an NMDA receptor antagonist used to model
schizophrenia in rodents [84], and chronic treatment
with caffeine renders rats less susceptible to motor ef-
fects of a typical antipsychotic [85].
Attention, impulsivity, cognitive performance, and
attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder
ADHD is a heterogeneous syndrome characterized
by inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity, motivation-
al/effort deficit, executive dysfunction, and impaired
performance that arises during childhood and usual-
ly persists, sometimes at lower levels, during adult-
hood [86]. This disorder involves structural and
functional pathological changes in frontal-subcortical-
cerebellar circuits and monoaminergic alterations [87].
The main pharmacological strategy is the use of the
psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate and am-
D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry S243
phetamine derivatives [86]. Thus, in contrast to po-
tentially problematic use of caffeine in subjects with
psychotic, bipolar, and anxiety disorders, caffeine may
have a therapeutic role in ADHD. Since the symp-
toms of ADHD are normally distributed in thepopula-
tion [88], this section discusses the effects of caffeine
on these cognitive and behavioral functionsin both nor-
mal volunteers and patients with ADHD.
Caffeine is often used as a strategy to increase the
ability to sustain attention, particularly in situations of
low arousal or fatigue. The effects of caffeine on atten-
tion and performance have been studied using several
paradigms and protocols.
Caffeine has been repeatedly shown to attenuate per-
formance impairments due to decreases in arousal in-
duced by sleep loss, fatigue, working at night, or by
sedative drugs [89–93]. Furthermore, caffeine can re-
move the impaired performance and negative mood
associated with the common cold [94] and attenuate
memory impairment induced by scopolamine in hu-
mans [95]. In general, effects of small doses of caf-
feine are detected in low alertness paradigms, where-
as more global and positive effects can be observed
with doses of 200–300 mg (1,53,96). Consistent pos-
itive effects of caffeine have been shown in reaction
times and vigilance performance [34,51,97]. Haskell
et al. [33] showed that caffeine enhanced self-reported
alertness and performance in attention and working
memory tasks in both nonconsumers and consumers af-
ter overnight abstinence. Additionally, Christopher et
al. [23] reported that caffeine increased self-rated alert-
ness and decreased reaction times on visual, cognitive,
and verbal reasoning tasks in regularcaffeine users who
were not in withdrawal. Also light, non-dependent caf-
feine users increase vigilance parameters with 150 mg
of caffeine [24]. Addicot and Laurienti [98] showed
that caffeine had a greater effect on mood and choice
reaction time in the abstained state than in the normal
caffeinated state, but caffeine improved selective atten-
tion and memory in both states. Smith [54] found that
caffeinated gum containing 40 mg led to better perfor-
mance, particularly in tasks requiring sustained atten-
tion. These studies suggest that despite the develop-
ment of tolerance and withdrawal reactions to some ex-
tent, caffeine can produce these effects in regular users
without abstinence and in non-regular users.
Caffeine can also influence stimulus processing.
Streufert et al. [99] have shown that caffeine increases
the speed of processing new stimuli, which was lat-
er confirmed [53]. Lorist and Snel [100] have also
shown better target detection and response preparation
by caffeine, whereas Ruijter et al. [101] have demon-
strated that the quantity of information processed is
greater after caffeine. Recently, caffeine was shown
to improve alerting and executive control function in a
dose-response manner, peaking at 200 mg [102]. More
rapid encoding of new informationwas also found with
40 mg caffeinated gum in volunteers with mean daily
consumption of 138 mg [54]. However, caffeine failed
to reduce resistance to distraction [103].
Three important cross-sectional populational studies
evaluated the association between cognitive function-
ing and caffeine intake in real-life situations [56,104,
105]. Jarvis [104] found a dose-response trend to im-
proved performancein simple reaction time, choice re-
action time, incidental verbal memory, and visuospatial
reasoning with higher levels of coffee consumption (P
<0.001in each task). Bestperformancewasassociated
with about 400 mg caffeine per day. For tea consump-
tion the associations were similar but weaker. Interest-
ingly, these results were more apparent in older that in
younger people. Smith [105] studied full time workers
who had a median daily caffeine intake between 120
and 159 mg. Caffeine consumption was significantly
associated with fewer cognitive failures (e.g., forget-
ting where things are, failures of concentration or doing
the wrong thing). Those who had higher caffeine con-
sumption (>than the median) had about half the risk of
self-reporting frequent/very frequent cognitive failures
and accidents at work compared to those with low caf-
feine intake. A similar study was conducted in a non-
working sample and again all caffeine groups showed
around 50% less risk of cognitive failures compared
to those who abstain from caffeine (lowest quartile of
caffeine intake) [105]. Also, the findings extended to
much lower risk of depression, as mentioned above.
These beneficial effects of caffeine did not seem to be
associated with negative health consequences and may
be related or add to the putative neuroprotective action
of caffeine [106] (and companion articles of this issue).
Thus, caffeine consumption is associated with better
cognitive functioning and reduced risk of depression,
and these effects do not seem to undergo significanttol-
erance. However, since these are cross-sectional stud-
ies, two main interpretations are possible: i) caffeine
produces benefits in cognitive functioning and mood,
or ii) those who naturally take more caffeine have bet-
ter functioning, i.e., higher caffeine intake is a behav-
ioral marker of personality traits associated with better
cognitive performance or healthier mood.
Regarding personality traits, high consumers of caf-
feine are more sensation-seekers and impulsive accord-
S244 D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry
ing to two studies [30,107], whereas impulsive indi-
viduals, particularly men, were found to have higher
caffeine intake [108]. Two other studies failed to find
correlations of caffeine intake with personality mea-
sures [109,110]. Importantly, these results go against
the interpretation that caffeine is a behavioral marker
of traits associated with better performance or more
elevated mood, since impulsivity would increase the
chance of making cognitive mistakes, and it is not
particularly associated with better mood. Also, harm
avoidance and self-directedness, which are associat-
ed with mood, performance and adjustment (i.e., high
harm avoidance and low self-directedness are consis-
tently found in subjects with mood disorders [111,
112]), were not different among low, moderate, and
high caffeine consumers [30]. Thus, the interpretation
that caffeine produces better functioning is the most
likely based on current data. Another possibility is that
higher caffeine intake may be a self-medication strate-
gy in some impulsive individuals. Indeed, caffeine fa-
cilitates the performance of impulsive individuals and
impairs the performance of non-impulsive individuals
taking complex cognitive tests in the morning, but not
in the evening [113,114].
Few studies with a small number of patients and
using far from ideal protocols have tested the effica-
cy of caffeine in children with minimal brain dysfunc-
tion, a diagnosis that nowadays corresponds to AD-
HD [115–120]. In comparison to methylphenidate and
d-amphetamine, caffeine was in general less effective.
However, some ADHD patients responded well or par-
ticularly well to caffeine [119,120], and addition of
caffeine to methylphenidate was also beneficial [117].
Unfortunately, clinical trials with larger and broad-
er samples (e.g. adults), wide dosage range, or flexi-
ble dose protocols are yet to be conducted. Interest-
ingly, caffeine improves cognitive performance in an
animal model of ADHD [121] and promotes effort-
related behavior in animals treated with dopamine an-
tagonists [122]. Therefore, based on observational and
experimental studies, caffeine is a candidate treatment
for ADHD. If proven effective, caffeine has the ad-
vantage of being easily available without the level of
abuse potential of methylphenidate and amphetamine
derivatives.
MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF CAFFEINE
WITH REFERENCE TO PSYCHIATRIC
DISORDERS
The primary action of caffeine is to block adenosine
A1 and A2A receptors. However, as adenosine is a
neuromodulator and affects several other neurotrans-
mitters, some indirect actions of caffeine are of partic-
ular relevanceto understand its effects on subjects with
the psychiatric disorders discussed in this paper.
One pivotal interaction of caffeine is with the
dopaminergic system (reviewed in [5,123]). There are
multipleand functionally different antagonistic interac-
tions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 recep-
tors, both post- and presynaptically, in such a manner
that activation of A2A receptors reduces D2 receptor
recognition, coupling, and signaling. This interaction
results in reduced reward functions mediated via the
indirect pathway,and lower glutamate drive to the pre-
frontal and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. There
are also relevant antagonistic A1–D1 receptor interac-
tions at the receptor and second messenger levels in the
basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex.
Reduced activity of dopaminergic system is thought
to play a central role in depression [124] and AD-
HD [86,87]. In contrast, higher dopamine activity
leads to increased salience perception, which proba-
bly contributes to bipolar mania [125] and may be the
final common pathway for psychosis [126]. Accord-
ingly, antidepressants and psychostimulants such as
methylphenidate increase dopaminergicactivity [86,?],
whereas D2 receptor antagonists exert antimanic and
antipsychotic effects [126]. Thus, increased dopamin-
ergic activity inducedby caffeine can have positive ef-
fects on mood, cognition, effort-related behavior, and
executive functions, but this effect may, on the other
hand, promote mania (or mood instability) and psy-
chosis.
Other putatively important effects of caffeine for
mood and attention are the increase in noradrenaline,
acetylcholine, and serotonin turnover,and noradrener-
gic and cholinergic firing (reviewed in [4]), but such
interactions need further studies.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Caffeine acts on two receptors with contrasting ac-
tions, which exert neuromodulating and homeostatic
effects. Thus, there may be optimal levels of adenosin-
ergic activity that can be influenced or manipulated by
the A1 and A2A receptor antagonism of caffeine, de-
pending on the context. The similarity of symptoms
present with high dose caffeine and caffeine withdraw-
al reinforce this notion of an optimum activity level,
which may be reached by adaptation of the adenosin-
ergic system in different situations. Clinically, a sim-
D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry S245
ilar phenomena under “opposite” circumstances oc-
curs comparing two psychiatric conditions: i) mixed
mood episodes (mood instability, dysphoria, poor con-
centration, distractibility, insomnia, irritability, agita-
tion), which is compatible with excessive monoamin-
ergic tone since improvementis achieved with atypical
antipsychotics by D2 receptor blockade, and ii) AD-
HD (hyperactivity, distractibility, agitation, inattention,
dysphoria, impulsivity, sleep problems), which may re-
flect deficient monoaminergic tone since psychostimu-
lants are effectiveto treat this condition.
Since caffeine is so easily available, most individuals
tend to naturally select doses that do not produce unfa-
vorable subjectiveand somatic effects, or performance
impairment. In other words, individuals have intrinsic
thresholds that may limit or prevent the repeated intake
of more than optimal doses of caffeine, which may limit
the emergence of anxiety, paranoid symptoms, or mood
instability. On the other hand, the reinforcing effects
of caffeine and emergence of withdrawal symptoms
induce repeated intake.
Besides the possible induction of mild drug depen-
dence, caffeine may bring some kind of benefit that
contributes to its widespread use. These benefits seem
to be related to adaptation of mental energy to the
context by increasing alertness, attention, and cogni-
tive function (more evident in longer or more difficult
tasks or situations of low arousal), and by elevating
mood. Thus, caffeine can be regarded as a pharmaco-
logical tool to increase effortful behaviorin daily activ-
ities. More populational (cross-sectional and prospec-
tive) and experimental studies are necessary to estab-
lish the role of caffeine intake in psychiatric disorders,
especially its putative efficacy on depressive mood and
cognitive/attentional disorders.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The author’s disclosures available online (http://
www.j-alz.com/disclosures/view.php?id=218).
REFERENCES
[1] Smith AP (2002) Effects of caffeine on human behaviour.
Food Chem Toxicol 40, 1243–1255.
[2] Smit HJ, Gaffan EA, Rogers PJ (2004) Methylxanthines are
the psycho-pharmacologically active constituents of choco-
late. Psychopharmacology (Berl)176, 412-419.
[3] Barone JJ, Roberts HR (1996) Caffeine consumption. Food
Chem Toxicol 34, 119-29.
[4] Fredholm BB, B¨
attig K, Holm´
en J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE
(1999) Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference
to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol
Rev 51, 83-133.
[5] Ferr´
e S (2008) An update on the mechanisms of the psychos-
timulant effects of caffeine J Neurochem 105, 1067-1079.
[6] Cunha RA, Ferr´
e S, Vaugeois JM, Chen JF (2008) Potential
therapeutic interest of adenosine A2A receptors in psychi-
atric disorders. Curr Pharm Des 14, 1512-1524.
[7] Lara DR, Dall’Igna OP, Ghisolfi ES, Brunstein MG (2006)
Involvement ofadenosine in the neurobiology ofschizophre-
nia and its therapeutic implications. Prog Neuropsychophar-
macol Biol Psychiatry 30, 617-629.
[8] Lara DR, Pinto O, Akiskal K, Akiskal HS (2006) Toward
an integrative model of the spectrum of mood, behavioral
and personality disorders based on fear and anger traits: I.
Clinical implications. J Affect Disord 94, 67-87.
[9] Nehlig A, Daval JL, Debry G (1992) Caffeine and the cen-
tral nervous system: mechanisms of action, biochemical,
metabolic and psychostimulant effects. Brain ResBrain Res
Rev 17, 139-70.
[10] Greden JF (1974). Anxiety or caffeinism: a diagnostic dilem-
ma. Am J Psychiatry 131, 1089-1092.
[11] Gilliland K, Andress D (1981) Ad lib caffeine consumption,
symptoms of caffeinism, and academic performance. Am J
Psychiatry 138, 512-514.
[12] Dews PB, O’Brien CP, Bergman J (2002) Caffeine: behav-
ioral effects of withdrawal and related issues. Food Chem
Toxicol 40, 1257-1261.
[13] Juliano LM, Griffiths RR (2004) A critical review of caffeine
withdrawal: empirical validation of symptoms and signs, in-
cidence, severity, and associated features. Psychopharmacol-
ogy (Berl)176, 1-29.
[14] Strain EC, Mumford GK, Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1994)
Caffeinedependencesyndrome.Evidencefromcasehistories
and experimental evaluations. JAMA 272, 1043-1048.
[15] Sigmon SC, Herning RI, Better W, Cadet JL, Griffiths RR
(2009) Caffeine withdrawal, acute effects, tolerance, and
absence of net beneficial effects of chronic administration:
cerebral blood flow velocity, quantitative EEG, and subjec-
tive effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl)204, 573-585.
[16] Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Friedman GD (1993) Coffee,
tea, and mortality. Ann Epidemiol 3, 375-381.
[17] Kendler KS, Myers J, O Gardner C (2006) Caffeine intake,
toxicity and dependence and lifetime riskfor psychiatric and
substance use disorders: an epidemiologic and co-twin con-
trol analysis. Psychol Med 36, 1717-1725.
[18] James JE, Keane MA (2007) Caffeine, sleep and wakeful-
ness: implications of new understanding about withdrawal
reversal. Hum Psychopharmacol 22, 549-558.
[19] Yeomans MR, Ripley T, Davies LH, Rusted JM, Rogers PJ
(2002) Effects of caffeine on performance and mood depend
on the level of caffeine abstinence. Psychopharmacology
(Berl)164, 241-249.
[20] James JE, Rogers PJ (2005) Effects of caffeine on perfor-
mance and mood: withdrawal reversal is the most plausible
explanation. Psychopharmacology (Berl)182, 1-8.
[21] Hewlett P, Smith A (2006) Acute effects of caffeine in vol-
unteers with different patterns of regular consumption. Hum
Psychopharmacol 21, 167-180.
[22] Hewlett P, Smith A (2007) Effects of repeated doses of caf-
feine on performance and alertness: new data and secondary
analyses. Hum Psychopharmacol 22, 339-350.
S246 D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry
[23] Christopher G, Sutherland D, Smith A (2005) Effects of caf-
feine in non-withdrawn volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol
20, 47-53.
[24] Childs E, de Wit H (2006) Subjective, behavioral, and physi-
ological effects of acute caffeine in light, nondependent caf-
feine users. Psychopharmacology (Berl)185, 514-523.
[25] Brice C, Smith A (2001) The effects of caffeine on simulated
driving, subjective alertness and sustained attention. Hum
Psychopharmacol 16, 523-531.
[26] Brice C, Smith A (2001) Caffeine levels in saliva: associa-
tions with psychosocial factors and behavioural effects. Hum
Psychopharmacol 16, 507-521.
[27] Green PJ, Suls J (1996) The effects of caffeine on ambulatory
blood pressure, heart rate, and mood in coffee drinkers. J
Behav Med 19, 111-128.
[28] Lader M, Bruce M (1986) States of anxiety and their induc-
tion by drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22, 251-261.
[29] Hire JN (1978) Anxiety and caffeine. Psychol Rep 42, 833-
834.
[30] Gurpegui M, Jurado D, Luna JD, Fern´
andez-Molina C,
Moreno-Abril O, G´
alvez R (2007) Personality traits associat-
ed with caffeine intake and smoking. Prog Neuropsychophar-
macol Biol Psychiatry 31, 997-1005.
[31] Stern KN, Chait LD, Johanson CE (1989) Reinforcing and
subjective effects of caffeine in normal human volunteers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl)98, 81-88.
[32] Rogers PJ, Martin J, Smith C, Heatherley SV,Smit HJ (2003)
Absence of reinforcing, mood and psychomotor performance
effects of caffeine in habitual non-consumers of caffeine.
Psychopharmacology (Berl)167, 54-62.
[33] Haskell CF, Kennedy DO, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB (2005)
Cognitive and mood improvements of caffeine in habitu-
al consumers and habitual non-consumers of caffeine. Psy-
chopharmacology (Berl)179, 813-825.
[34] SilvermanK,GriffithsRR(1992)Low-dosecaffeine discrim-
ination and self-reported mood effects in normal volunteers.
J Exp Anal Behav 57, 91-107.
[35] Boulenger JP, Uhde TW, Wolff EA III, Post RM (1984) In-
creased sensitivity to caffeine in patients with panic disorders
Preliminary evidence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41, 1067-1071.
[36] Charney DS, Heninger GR, Jatlow PI (1985) Increased anx-
iogenic effects of caffeine in panic disorders. Arch Gen Psy-
chiatry 42, 233-243.
[37] Bruce M, Scott N, Shine P, Lader M (1992) Anxiogenic
effects of caffeine in patients with anxiety disorders. Arch
Gen Psychiatry 49, 867-869.
[38] Lee MA, Flegel P, Greden JF, Cameron OG (1988) Anxio-
genic effects of caffeine on panic and depressed patients. Am
J Psychiatry 145, 632-635.
[39] Nardi AE, Lopes FL, Freire RC, Veras AB, Nascimento I,
Valenc¸a AM, de-Melo-Neto VL, Soares-Filho GL, King AL,
Ara´
ujo DM, Mezzasalma MA, Rassi A, Zin WA (2009) Panic
disorder and social anxiety disorder subtypes in a caffeine
challenge test. Psychiatry Res 169, 149-153.
[40] Nardi AE, Valenc¸a AM, Nascimento I, Freire RC, Veras
AB, de-Melo-Neto VL, Lopes FL, King AL, Soares-Filho
GL, Mezzasalma MA, Rassi A, Zin WA (2008) A caffeine
challenge test in panic disorder patients, their healthy first-
degree relatives and healthy controls. Depress Anxiety 25,
847-853.
[41] Masdrakis VG, Papakostas YG, Vaidakis N, Papageorgiou
C, Pehlivanidis A (2008) Caffeine challenge in patients with
panicdisorder: baselinedifferencesbetweenthose who panic
and those who do not. Depress Anxiety 25, E72-79.
[42] Koran LM, Aboujaoude E, Gamel NN (2009) Double-blind
study of dextroamphetamine versus caffeine augmentation
for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin
Psychiatry 70, 1530-5153.
[43] Alsene K, Deckert J, Sand P, de Wit H (2003) Association
between A2a receptor gene polymorphisms and caffeine-
induced anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 1694-1702.
[44] Childs E, Hohoff C, Deckert J, Xu K, Badner J, de Wit H
(2008) Association between ADORA2A and DRD2 poly-
morphisms and caffeine-induced anxiety. Neuropsychophar-
macology 33, 2791-2800.
[45] Cornelis MC, El-Sohemy A, Campos H (2007) Genetic poly-
morphism of the adenosine A2A receptor is associated with
habitual caffeine consumption. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 240-244.
[46] Hohoff C, Domschke K, Schwarte K, Spellmeyer G, V¨
ogele
C, Hetzel G, Deckert J, Gerlach AL (2009) Sympathetic
activity relates to adenosine A(2A) receptor gene variation
in blood-injury phobia. J Neural Transm 116, 659-662.
[47] Deckert J, N¨
othen MM, Franke P, Delmo C, Fritze J, Knapp
M, Maier W, Beckmann H, Propping P (1998) Systematic
mutation screening and association study of the A1 and A2a
adenosine receptor genes in panic disorder suggest a contri-
bution of the A2a gene to the development of disease. Mol
Psychiatry 3, 81-85.
[48] Hamilton SP, Slager SL, De Leon AB, Heiman GA, Klein
DF, Hodge SE, Weissman MM, Fyer AJ, Knowles JA (2004)
Evidence for genetic linkage between a polymorphism in the
adenosine 2A receptor and panic disorder. Neuropsychophar-
macology 29, 558-565.
[49] Yamada K, Hattori E, Shimizu M, Sugaya A, Shibuya H,
Yoshikawa T (2001) Association studies of the cholecys-
tokinin B receptor and A2a adenosine receptor genes in panic
disorder. J Neural Transm 108, 837-48.
[50] Lam P, Hong CJ, Tsai SJ (2005) Association study of A2a
adenosine receptor genetic polymorphism in panic disorder.
Neurosci Lett 378, 98-101.
[51] Lieberman HR, Tharion WJ, Shukitt-Hale B, Speckman
KL, Tulley R (2002) Effects of caffeine, sleep loss, and
stress on cognitive performance and mood during U.S. Navy
SEAL training. Sea-Air-Land. Psychopharmacology (Berl)
164, 250-261.
[52] Lieberman HR, Wurtman RJ, Emde GG, Roberts C, Covielle
ILG (1987) The effects of low doses of caffeine on hu-
man performance and mood. Psychopharmacology (Berl)92,
308-312.
[53] Smith AP, Sturgess W, Gallagher J (1999) Effects of a low
dose of caffeine given in different drinks on mood and per-
formance. Hum Psychopharmacol 14, 473-482.
[54] Smith A. (2009) Effects of caffeine in chewing gum on mood
and attention. Hum Psychopharmacol 24, 239-247.
[55] Silverman K, Evans SM, Strain EC, Griffiths RR (1992)
Withdrawal syndromeafter thedouble-blind cessation ofcaf-
feine consumption. N Engl J Med 327, 1109-1114.
[56] Smith AP (2009) Caffeine, cognitive failures and health in
a non-working community sample. Hum Psychopharmacol
24, 29-34.
[57] Kawachi I, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Speizer
FE (1996) A prospective study of coffee drinking and suicide
in women. Arch Intern Med 156, 521-525.
[58] Tanskanen A, Tuomilehto J, Viinam¨
aki H, Vartiainen E,
Lehtonen J, Puska P (2000) Heavy coffee drinking and the
risk of suicide. Eur J Epidemiol 16, 789-791.
[59] Lara DR, Souza DO (2000) Adenosine and antidepressant
effects of sleep deprivation. Am J Psychiatry 157, 1707-1708.
D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry S247
[60] Schwartzhaupt AW, Lara DR, Hirakata VN, Schuch A,
Almeida E, Silveira L, Caldieraro MA, Fleck MP (2009)
Does caffeine change the effect of sleep deprivation on mod-
erate to severe depressed patients? J Affect Disord 112, 279-
283.
[61] Ogawa N, Ueki H (2003) Secondary mania caused by caf-
feine. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 25, 138-139.
[62] Tondo L, Rudas N (1991) The course of a seasonal bipolar
disorder influenced by caffeine. J Affect Disord 22, 249-251.
[63] Dratcu L, Grandison A, McKay G,Bamidele A, Vasudevan V
(2007) Clozapine-resistant psychosis, smoking, and caffeine:
managing the neglected effects of substances that our patients
consume every day. Am J Ther 14, 314-318.
[64] Caykoylu A, Ekinci O, Kuloglu M (2008) Improvement from
treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder, manic type af-
ter stopping heavy caffeine intake: a case report. Prog Neu-
ropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32, 1349-1350.
[65] Kaplan GB, Greenblatt DJ, Ehrenberg BL, Goddard JE,
Cotreau MM, Harmatz JS, Shader RI(1997) Dose-dependent
pharmacokinetics and psychomotor effects of caffeine in hu-
mans. J Clin Pharmacol 37, 693-703.
[66] Baethge C, Tondo L, Lepri B, Baldessarini RJ (2009) Coffee
and cigarette use: association with suicidal acts in 352 Sar-
dinian bipolar disorder patients. Bipolar Disord 11, 494-503.
[67] KilziehN,AkiskalHS(1999)Rapid-cyclingbipolar disorder.
An overview of research and clinical experience. Psychiatr
Clin North Am 22, 585-607.
[68] Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, O’Donovan C, Parikh S, Mac-
Queen G, McIntyre R, Sharma V, Silverstone P, Alda M,
Baruch P, Beaulieu S, Daigneault A, Milev R, Young LT,
Ravindran A, Schaffer A, Connolly M, Gorman CP; Canadi-
an Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (2005) Cana-
dian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT)
guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar dis-
order: consensus and controversies. Bipolar Disord 7, 5-69.
[69] MacManamy MC, Schube, PG (1936) Caffeine intoxication:
Report of a case the symptoms of which amounted to a psy-
chosis. N Engl J Med 215, 616-620.
[70] Shaul PW, Farrell MK, Maloney MJ (1984) Caffeine toxicity
as a cause of acute psychosis in anorexia nervosa. J Pediatr
105, 493-495.
[71] Hedges DW,Woon FL, Hoopes SP (2009) Caffeine-induced
psychosis. CNS Spectr 14, 127-129.
[72] Mikkelsen EJ (1978)Caffeine and schizophrenia. J Clin Psy-
chiatry 39, 732-736.
[73] Zaslove MO, Russell RL, Ross E (1991) Effect of caffeine
intake on psychotic in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 159, 565-
567.
[74] de Freitas B, Schwartz G (1979) Effects of caffeine in chronic
psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 136, 1337-1338.
[75] Koczapski A, Paredes J, Kogan C, Ledwidge B, Higenbottam
J (1989) Effects of caffeine on behavior of schizophrenic
inpatients. Schizophr Bull 15, 339-344.
[76] Mayo KM, Falkowski W, Jones CA (1993) Caffeine: use and
effects in long-stay psychiatric patients. Br J Psychiatry 162,
543-545.
[77] Lucas PB, Pickar D, Kelsoe J, Rapaport M, Pato C, Hommer
D (1990) Effects of the acute administration of caffeine in
patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 28, 35-40.
[78] Rihs M, Muller C, Baumann P (1996) Caffeine consumption
in hospitalized psychiatric patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin
Neurosci 246, 83-92.
[79] Strassnig M, Brar JS, Ganguli R (2006) Increased caffeine
and nicotine consumption in community-dwelling patients
with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 86, 269-275.
[80] Adolfo AB, AhnAllen CG, TideyJW (2009) Effects of smok-
ing cues on caffeine urges in heavy smokers and caffeine
consumers with and without schizophrenia. Schizophr Res
107, 192-197.
[81] Leonard S, Mexal S, Freedman R (2007) Smoking, Genetics
and Schizophrenia: Evidence for Self Medication. J Dual
Diagn 3, 43-59.
[82] Ghisolfi ES, Margis R, Becker J, Zanardo AP, Strimitzer
IM, Lara DR (2004) Impaired P50 sensory gating in post-
traumatic stress disorder secondary to urban violence. Int J
Psychophysiol 51, 209-214.
[83] Ghisolfi ES, Schuch A, Strimitzer IM Jr, Luersen G,Martins
FF, Ramos FL, Becker J, Lara DR (2006) Caffeine modu-
lates P50 auditory sensory gating in healthy subjects. Eur
Neuropsychopharmacol 16, 204-210.
[84] de Oliveira RV, Dall’Igna OP, Tort AB, Schuh JF, Neto PF,
Santos Gomes MW, Souza DO, Lara DR (2005) Effect of
subchronic caffeine treatment on MK-801-induced changes
in locomotion, cognition and ataxia in mice. Behav Pharma-
col 16, 79-84.
[85] G´
ongora-Alfaro JL, Moo-Puc RE, Villanueva-Toledo JR,
Alvarez-Cervera FJ, Bata-Garc´
ıa JL, Heredia-L´
opez FJ,
Pineda JC. (2009) Long-lasting resistance to haloperidol-
induced catalepsy in male rats chronically treated with caf-
feine. Neurosci Lett 463, 210-214.
[86] Biederman J, Faraone SV (2005) Attention-deficit hyperac-
tivity disorder. Lancet 366, 237-248.
[87] Volkow ND, Wang GJ,Kollins SH, Wigal TL, Newcorn JH,
TelangF, FowlerJS,ZhuW,LoganJ,MaY,PradhanK,Wong
C, Swanson JM (2009) Evaluating dopamine reward pathway
in ADHD: clinical implications. JAMA 302, 1084-1091.
[88] Nigg JT, John OP, Blaskey LG, Huang-Pollock CL, Willcutt
EG, Hinshaw SP, Pennington B (2002) Big five dimensions
and ADHD symptoms: links between personality traits and
clinical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol 83, 451-69.
[89] Rogers PJ, Heatherley SV, Hayward RC, Seers HE, Hill J,
Kane M (2005) Effects of caffeine and caffeine withdraw-
al on mood and cognitive performance degraded by sleep
restriction. Psychopharmacology (Berl)179, 742-752.
[90] Johnson LC, Freeman CR, Spinweber CL, Gomez SA (1991)
Subjective and objective measures of sleepiness: effect
of benzodiazepine and caffeine on their relationship. Psy-
chophysiology 28, 65-71.
[91] Johnson LC, Spinweber CL, Gomez SA (1990) Benzodi-
azepines and caffeine: effect on daytime sleepiness, perfor-
mance, and mood. Psychopharmacology (Berl)101, 160-
167.
[92] Zwyghuizen-Doorenbos A, Roehrs TA, Lipschutz L, Timms
V, Roth T (1990) Effects of caffeine on alertness. Psy-
chopharmacology (Berl)100, 36-39.
[93] Smith A, Sutherland D, Christopher G (2005) Effects of re-
peated doses of caffeine on mood and performance of alert
and fatigued volunteers. J Psychopharmacol 19, 620-626.
[94] Smith A, Thomas M, Perry K, Whitney H (1997) Caffeine
and the common cold. J Psychopharmacol 11, 319-324.
[95] Smith A, Kendrick A, Maben A,Salmon J (1994) Effects of
breakfast and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and
cardiovascular functioning. Appetite 22, 39-55.
[96] Smit HJ, Rogers PJ (2000) Effects of low doses of caffeine
on cognitive performance, mood and thirst in low and higher
S248 D.R. Lara / Caffeine and Psychiatry
caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology (Berl)152, 167-
173.
[97] Riedel W, Hogervorst E, Leboux R, Verhey F (1995) Caf-
feine attenuates scopolamine-induced memory impairment
in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl)122, 158–168.
[98] Addicott MA, Laurienti PJ (2009) A comparison of the ef-
fects of caffeine following abstinence and normal caffeine
use. Psychopharmacology (Berl)207, 423-431.
[99] Streufert S, Satish U, Pogash R, Gingrich D, Landis R,
Roache J, Severs W (1997) Excess coffee consumption in
simulated complex work settings: detriment or facilitation of
performance? J Appl Psychol 82, 774-782.
[100] Lorist MM, Snel J (1997) Caffeine effects on perceptual and
motor processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102,
401-413.
[101] Ruijter J, De Ruiter MB, Snel J (2000) The effects of caf-
feine on visual selective attention to color: an ERP study.
Psychophysiology 37, 427-439.
[102] Bruny´
e TT, Mahoney CR, Lieberman HR, Taylor HA (2009)
Caffeine modulates attention network function. Brain Cogn,
in press.
[103] KenemansJL,WielemanJS,ZeegersM,VerbatenMN(1999)
Caffeine and stroop interference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav
63, 589-598.
[104] Jarvis MJ. (1993) Does caffeine intake enhance absolute lev-
els of cognitive performance? Psychopharmacology (Berl)
110, 45-52.
[105] SmithAP(2005)Caffeineatwork.Human Psychopharmacol
20, 441-445.
[106] Cunha RA (2008) Caffeine, adenosine receptors, memory
and Alzheimer disease. Med Clin (Barc)131, 790-795.
[107] Jones HA, Lejuez CW (2005) Personality correlates of caf-
feine dependence: the role of sensation seeking, impulsivity,
and risk taking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13, 259-266.
[108] Waldeck TL, Miller LS (1997) Gender and impulsivity dif-
ferences in licit substance use. J Subst Abuse 9, 269-275.
[109] Brice CF, Smith AP(2002) Factors associated with caffeine
consumption. Int J Food Sci Nutr 53, 55-64.
[110] Hewlett P, Smith A (2006) Correlates of daily caffeine con-
sumption. Appetite 46, 97-99.
[111] CloningerCR,SvrakicDM,PrzybeckTR(2006)Canperson-
ality assessment predict future depression? A twelve-month
follow-up of 631 subjects. J Affect Disord 92, 35-44.
[112] Hansenne M, Bianchi J (2009) Emotional intelligence and
personality in major depression: trait versus state effects.
Psychiatry Res 166, 63-68.
[113] Anderson KJ, Revelle W (1982) Impulsivity, caffeine, and
proofreading: a test of the Easterbrook hypothesis. J Exp
Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8, 614-624.
[114] Revelle W, Humphreys MS, Simon L, Gilliland K (1980) The
interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: a
test of the arousal model. J Exp Psychol Gen 109, 1-31.
[115] Gross MD (1975) Caffeine in the treatment of children with
minimal brain dysfunction or hyperkinetic syndrome. Psy-
chosomatics 16, 26-27.
[116] Schnackenberg RC (1973) Caffeine as a substitute for Sched-
ule II stimulants in hyperkinetic children. Am J Psychiatry
130, 796-798.
[117] Garfinkel BD, Webster CD, Sloman L (1981) Responses to
methylphenidate and varied doses of caffeine in children with
attention deficit disorder. Can J Psychiatry 26, 395-401.
[118] Huestis RD, Arnold LE, Smeltzer DJ (1975) Caffeine versus
methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in minimal brain dys-
function: a double-blind comparison. Am J Psychiatry 132,
868-870.
[119] Arnold LE, Christopher J, Huestis R, Smeltzer DJ (1978)
Methylphenidate vs dextroamphetamine vs caffeine in min-
imal brain dysfunction: controlled comparison by placebo
washout design with Bayes’ analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry
35, 463-473.
[120] Garfinkel BD, Webster CD, Sloman L (1975) Individual re-
sponses to methylphenidate and caffeine in children with
minimal brain dysfunction. Can Med Assoc J 113, 729-732.
[121] Prediger RD, Pamplona FA, Fernandes D, Takahashi RN
(2005) Caffeine improves spatial learning deficits in an an-
imal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (AD-
HD) the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). Int J Neu-
ropsychopharmacol 8, 583-594.
[122] Salamone JD, Farrar AM, Font L, Patel V, Schlar DE,
Nunes EJ, Collins LE,Sager TN (2009) Differential actions
of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related
effects of dopamine D2 antagonism. Behav Brain Res 201,
216-222.
[123] Fuxe K, Ferr´
e S, Genedani S, Franco R, Agnati LF (2007)
Adenosine receptor-dopamine receptor interactions in the
basal ganglia and their relevance for brain function. Physiol
Behav 92, 210-217.
[124] Yadid G, Friedman A (2008) Dynamics of the dopaminergic
system as a key component to the understanding of depres-
sion. Prog Brain Res 172, 265-286.
[125] Berk M, Dodd S, Kauer-Sant’anna M, Malhi GS, Bourin
M, Kapczinski F, Norman T (2007) Dopamine dysregulation
syndrome: implications for a dopamine hypothesis of bipolar
disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 434, 41-49.
[126] Howes OD, Kapur S (2009) The dopamine hypothesis of
schizophrenia: version III the final common pathway.
Schizophr Bull 35, 549-562.
... Caffeine, a natural psychostimulant alkaloid, can be found in over fifty plants, such as tea leaves, cocoa pods, and coffee beans [1,2]. This psychoactive drug is identified as the most commonly consumed drug on the global scale [3]. ...
... Psychoticism, or peculiar thinking, could lead to the onset or worsening of caffeine-related symptoms and possibly more severe cases of CUD [39]. Moreover, impaired concentration indicates the cognitive effects of caffeine consumption and withdrawal, so cognitive impairment could be an important factor in sustaining unhealthy caffeine habits [1]. And, of course, the centrality of 'craving' and bingeeating highlights their role as essential cogs in the CUD machine. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Caffeine Use Disorder (CUD) is not currently recognized as a formal diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). However, recent studies within the DSM-5 context have explored this issue. Also, this disorder is closely associated with caffeine withdrawal symptoms, which are formally recognized as a diagnosis in the DSM-5. Additionally, there is limited evidence regarding the connection between caffeine-related issues and psychiatric symptoms. The main aim of the present study was to determine the network structure of CUD and caffeine withdrawal symptoms among the general population. Also, the bridge symptoms among CUD, psychiatric symptoms, and caffeine withdrawal have been estimated. Method Participants were 1228 adults (50.3% females, Mean age (x̄±sd) 35.49 ± 11.70 years) who completed Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ), Caffeine Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (CWSQ), and Symptom Checklist-25 (SCL-25). All estimations were conducted according to the Gaussian Graphical Model. Results “Excessive consumption” and “role obligations” were central symptoms in the CUD network. Difficulty in concentration was the most central node in the caffeine withdrawal network. Also, the obsessive-compulsive symptom emerged as a central and highly influential node in the relationship between caffeine-related nodes and psychiatric symptoms. Conclusions Mental health providers should target these specific symptoms in clinical interventions to mitigate caffeine-related problems among individuals in the general population effectively.
... Yoksunluk durumunda olumsuz etki artış gösterebilir ancak bu beklenti etkilerini yansıtabilir (Lara, 2010;Nehlig, 2010;Smith, 2002). Öte yandan kafein yoksunluğu baş ağrısı, yorgunluk veya uyuşukluk, anksiyeteye neden olabilir ve kafein alımının kesilmesinden 1-2 gün sonra zirveye çıkan depresif belirtilere neden olabilir ve bir haftaya kadar sürebilir (Lara, 2010). ...
... Yoksunluk durumunda olumsuz etki artış gösterebilir ancak bu beklenti etkilerini yansıtabilir (Lara, 2010;Nehlig, 2010;Smith, 2002). Öte yandan kafein yoksunluğu baş ağrısı, yorgunluk veya uyuşukluk, anksiyeteye neden olabilir ve kafein alımının kesilmesinden 1-2 gün sonra zirveye çıkan depresif belirtilere neden olabilir ve bir haftaya kadar sürebilir (Lara, 2010). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Kafein, merkezi sinir sistemini uyararak atletik performansı olumlu yönde etkileyen bir ergojenik destektir. Günlük 300-400 mg kafein tüketimi yetişkinler için güvenli kabul edilirken, sporcular için optimal dozun bireysel tolerans ve spor dalına bağlı olarak değişebileceği vurgulanmaktadır. Araştırmalar, dayanıklılık egzersizlerinde (90 dakikadan uzun) ve kısa süreli şiddetli egzersizlerde kafeinin yorgunluğu geciktirerek performansı %4-14 oranında artırdığını göstermiştir. Bunun yanında, kafeinin psiko-uyarıcı etkilerinin bazı bireylerde anksiyete, uykusuzluk ve baş ağrısı gibi yan etkilere yol açabileceği belirtilmektedir. Bu nedenle, kafein tüketiminin müsabaka öncesi denenmesi ve bireysel toleransın belirlenmesi önerilmektedir. Kafein, uygun dozda kullanıldığında, dayanıklılık ve kuvvet performansına katkı sağlayabilen, ekonomik ve etkili bir performans artırıcıdır.
... Yoksunluk durumunda olumsuz etki artış gösterebilir ancak bu beklenti etkilerini yansıtabilir (Lara, 2010;Nehlig, 2010;Smith, 2002). Öte yandan kafein yoksunluğu baş ağrısı, yorgunluk veya uyuşukluk, anksiyeteye neden olabilir ve kafein alımının kesilmesinden 1-2 gün sonra zirveye çıkan depresif belirtilere neden olabilir ve bir haftaya kadar sürebilir (Lara, 2010). ...
... Yoksunluk durumunda olumsuz etki artış gösterebilir ancak bu beklenti etkilerini yansıtabilir (Lara, 2010;Nehlig, 2010;Smith, 2002). Öte yandan kafein yoksunluğu baş ağrısı, yorgunluk veya uyuşukluk, anksiyeteye neden olabilir ve kafein alımının kesilmesinden 1-2 gün sonra zirveye çıkan depresif belirtilere neden olabilir ve bir haftaya kadar sürebilir (Lara, 2010). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Paradigma, bilim insanlarının dünyaya bakış açısını şekillendirmek amacıyla kullanılmakta olan görüş demektir. Çok yönlü bir nitelik barındıran paradigma, yaklaşım ve modelleri çevreleyen ve araştırmacı bireyin olay ve olgularla alakalı durumdaki bakış açısını yahut dünya görüşünü ifade etmesine paradigma denmektedir. Bundan dolayı bilimsel konular üzerinde gerçekleştirilen her türlü araştırmada paradigmalar etken niteliktedir. Ayrıca araştırmacı bireyin kendi felsefi düşüncesine göre nicel, nitel yahut karma paradigmalardan birinden yararlanılabilir. Sporda Yeni Paradigmalar isimli kitabımız, spor bilimlerindeki akademik çalışmaları bir araya getirerek multidisipliner bir yaklaşımla hazırlanmıştır. Spor bilimleri alanındaki yenilikçi çalışmalara yer verilerek hazırlanan kitapta yedi bölüm bulunmaktadır. Bu bölümlerde teknolojik yeniliklerin ve yeni yaklaşımların oluşturulması hedeflenmiştir. Ayrıca Spor eğitiminden ve spor yönetimine kadar farklı bölümler mevcuttur. Alandaki yenilikçi çalışmaların literatüre katkı sağlaması amaçlanmaktadır.
... This finding aligns with several studies that have identified tea consumption as having a protective effect against depression. (10)(11)(12)(13) Likewise, a recent meta-analysis has provided evidence on the positive impact of tea consumption against depression. (14) Researchers have recently become interested in exploring the potential benefits of tea consumption for mental well-being and proposed their biochemical mechanisms. ...
... (15,16) Caffeine in tea is known to improve alertness and mood. (13) Additionally, theaflavins, the primary polyphenolic compounds in black tea, may protect against oxidative stress. (17) The significant association between sedentary lifestyle and depression among psychiatric patients compared to controls in the present study is con-sistent with previous studies suggesting that exercise can alleviate depressive symptoms and improve overall physical and mental well-being. ...
Article
Background: Depression is a serious mental disorder and is ranked as the fourth leading cause of disease burden worldwide, which can be multifactorial with unclear etiology. Therefore, this study assessed the association be­tween certain lifestyle habits and depression among psychiatric patients in Sana’a city, Yemen. Methods: An unmatched case-control study was conducted in October and November 2019 at Al-Amal Hospital for Psychiatric Diseases and outpatient clinics of the University of Science and Technology Hospital (USTH) in Sana’a. Thirty patients aged 18–65 years, with a mean age of 31.1 ± 10.4 years, who were diagnosed with major or unipolar depression for the first time in the past three months were conveniently selected as cases, while 90 adult subjects, with a mean age of 30.9 ± 10.5 years, were conveniently selected as non-depressed controls from various USTH clinics other than the psychiatric clinic during the study period. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle habits were collected using a structured questionnaire. Univariate analysis using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to test the association between lifestyle habits and depression, with a confidence level of less than 0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant association between depression among patients attending psychi­atric clinics and current smoking status (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.29–2.57; P = 0.785), khat chewing (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.41–2.25; P = 0.913), or the frequency of khat chewing (OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.21–3.26; P = 0.932). Coffee drinking was not significantly associated with depression (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.50–2.62; P = 0.750), while infrequent drinking of red tea was significantly associated with depression among patients compared to controls (OR = 16.8, 95% CI: 6.14–45.73; P <0.001). On the other hand, no significant association was found between hours of sleep per day and depression (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.71–3.87; P = 0.245). However, sedentary lifestyle was significantly associated with depression among psychiatric patients compared to controls (OR = 5.2, 95% CI: 2.15–12.7; P <0.001). Conclusion: Drinking red tea and regular exercise may help reduce depression in psychiatric patients with de­pression. By encouraging the integration of red tea consumption and regular exercise into the daily routine of Yemeni patients with depression, healthcare providers can support the mental health and well-being of this pop­ulation.
... Research has examined the connection between caffeine, the most important substance in coffee, on OCD symptoms [2,6,22,23]. The results, however, are unclear and point to a complicated relationship that might differ greatly among people. ...
... However, the same source also warns that coffee intake can exacerbate anxiety, a common component of OCD, suggesting that while it might help some individuals, it could worsen symptoms in others [6]. Moreover, another study indicates that while moderate caffeine intake has been associated with fewer depressive symptoms and cognitive failures, its effects on OCD speci cally are less well-documented [22]. This underscores the variability in caffeine's impact, which could be in uenced by individual differences in genetic makeup and the presence of speci c psychiatric conditions. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background The relationship between coffee consumption and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is inconsistent in previous clinical studies and is still in dispute. This study employs a Mendelian randomization approach to examine the causal relationship between coffee consumption and the prevention of OCD in a European population. Methods The summary statistics of coffee consumption (coffee intake, instant coffee intake, and filtered coffee intake) were obtained from the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit consortium, UK Biobank (UKB) data and OCD information was obtained from the FinnGen Consortium (1059 patients and 198110 controls). Sensitivity analysis under various model assumptions was carried out using multiple MR approaches to assess the impact of pleiotropy effects and outliers. Results Genetically predicted coffee consumption was associated with a lower risk of OCD in the main analysis (OR 0.332, 95% CI 0.117,0.943, P = 0.038), especially with instant coffee intake (OR = 0.014, 95%CI: 0,0.426, P = 0.014), but not with filter coffee (OR = 1.037, 95%CI: 0.772,1.392, P = 0.810). There was no significant heterogeneity and pleiotropy between the cohorts. The findings were strong and convincing as the results aligned with the previous study. Conclusions Our MR results based on genetic data revealed the potential protective effect of coffee intake and instant coffee intake on OCD, except for filtered coffee intake. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of coffee consumption habits in the diet in preventing OCD. Additional research with OCD sufferers and more reliable SNPs is required. It is also advised that our findings be verified.
... Signal transmission in monoaminergic systems modulated in this way is thought to underlie caffeine's effects on behavior, perception, and thought processes, including various psychotic symptoms [16]. Since caffeine, which is highly popular and can be consumed in various forms, has an extensive range of effects on the human body, its mechanisms of action, dosages of use, and side effects must be carefully evaluated [17]. This review was conducted to examine the effects of caffeine consumption on depression, anxiety, and stress levels and to offer some recommendations for its future use. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review Caffeine has high bioavailability and a purine-like alkaloid structure. It exerts wide-ranging physiological effects by binding to adenosine receptors throughout the human body. Through the activation of those receptors, it can regulate many physiological events in the body. The impact of caffeine consumption on depression, anxiety, stress, and human health remains unclear, constituting an important knowledge gap. This review was conducted to examine the effects of caffeine consumption on depression, anxiety, and stress levels and to offer some recommendations for its future use. Recent Findings We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases for original articles published in recent years on “caffeine metabolism”, “caffeine mechanism”, “anxiety”, “depression”, “stress”. Caffeine, which has an antagonistic effect on adenosine, can reduce the risk and symptoms of depression and improve general mental health by modulating the central nervous system and neurotransmitter systems. However, increases in anxiety and stress levels, which are often seen together with depression, are observed due to high-dose caffeine consumption. Summary Caffeine’s effects on depression, anxiety, and stress may vary depending on different factors, but the level of consumption is particularly important and attention should be paid to upper limits and reference values while evaluating consumption amounts.
... Caffeine use disorders do not arise over a short time interval and in the context of genetic predisposition and caffeine exposure interaction, there is an intricate interplay over time and studies have generally not considered potential extrinsic (e.g. the The association between caffeine use disorder and nondrug psychiatric disorders can also be a confounding variable. Moderate caffeine intake (< 6 cups/day) may help with depressive symptoms, and suicide risk whereas high caffeine intake has been associated with anxiety, psychotic and manic symptoms [131]. Like other substance use disorders, the relapsing and remitting trajectory of caffeine use disorder has not been sufficiently examined. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Coffee and tea consumption account for most caffeine intake and 2–3 billion cups are taken daily around the world. Caffeine dependence is a widespread but under recognized problem. Objectives To conduct a systematic review on the genetic susceptibility factors affecting caffeine metabolism and caffeine reward and their association with caffeine intake. Methodology We conducted PubMed and Embase searches using the terms “caffeine”, “reward”, “gene”, “polymorphism”, “addiction”, “dependence” and "habit" from inception till 2024. The demographics, genetic and clinical data from included studies were extracted and analyzed. Only case-control studies on habitual caffeine drinkers with at least 100 in each arm were included. Results A total of 2552 studies were screened and 26 studies involving 1,851,428 individuals were included. Several genes that were involved with caffeine metabolism such as CYP1A2, ADORA2A, AHR, POR, ABCG2, CYP2A6, PDSS2 and HECTD4 rs2074356 (A allele specific to East Asians and monomorphic in Europeans, Africans and Americans) were associated with habitual caffeine consumption with effect size difference of 3% to 32% in number of cups of caffeinated drink per day per effect allele. In addition, ALDH2 was linked to the Japanese population. Genes associated with caffeine reward included BDNF, SLC6A4, GCKR, MLXIPL and dopaminergic genes such as DRD2 and DAT1 which had around 2–5% effect size difference in number of cups of caffeinated drink for each allele per day. Conclusion Several genes that were involved in caffeine metabolism and reward were associated with up to 30% effect size difference in number of cups of caffeinated drink per day, and some associations were specific to certain ethnicities. Identification of at-risk caffeine dependence individuals can lead to early diagnosis and stratification of at-risk vulnerable individuals such as pregnant women and children, and can potentially lead to development of drug targets for dependence to caffeine.
Article
Psychotic symptoms, characterized by hallucinations, delusions, and cognitive disturbances, are associated with various psychiatric and neurological disorders. This manuscript explores two cases of acute psychotic episodes triggered by the regular consumption of herbal products. The cases highlight the need for increased awareness of the potential toxic side effects of herbal products. The impact of herbal ingredients like maca and matcha on neurotransmitter activity is explored, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms leading to psychosis. The manuscript highlights the need to report both the benefits and risks of herbal products, challenging the misconception that they are inherently safe.
Thesis
Full-text available
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the formation of amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles in cortical areas, leading to progressive memory loss and cognitive impairments, and it is the most common form of dementia. Intracerebroventricular injections of streptozotocin (ICV-STZ) have been used as an experimental model of sporadic AD (SAD) in rodents due to their ability to impair brain insulin signaling, induce oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and dysfunctions in neurogenesis, as well as cognitive decline, which are characteristic features of SAD. Chlorogenic Acid (CGA) and Caffeine (CAF), the main compounds found in coffee, have properties such as glucose metabolism modulation, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, which have already been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of CGA and CAF on cognitive deficits, neuronal damage, and neuroinflammation in mice subjected to the experimental model of ICV-STZ-induced SAD. Male Swiss mice (25-35 g) received bilateral ICV-STZ (3 mg/kg, 1.5 µl) on days 1 and 3 of the experiment. Treatment with CGA (5 mg/kg, orally) and CAF (15 mg/kg, orally) or vehicle (water, orally) was administered for 26 days, starting 2 hours after the second induction procedure. Blood glucose levels of the animals were measured before and after the induction of SAD. The results demonstrated that there were no significant alterations in blood glucose levels. ICV-STZ caused deficits in aversive, recognition, and spatial memory. Treatment with CGA and CAF protected against deficits in aversive, recognition, and spatial memory. Locomotor activity, working memory, and anxiety-related parameters were not altered. ICV-STZ resulted in increased concentrations of nitrite/nitrate and MDA. Treatment with CGA and CAF protected against the increase in nitrite/nitrate and MDA concentrations in the cortex and hippocampus. Treatment with CGA and CAF protected against increased concentrations of nitrite/nitrate and MDA in the cortex and hippocampus. ICV-STZ caused a decrease in viable neurons, BDNF depletion and astrogliosis and microgliosis in the cortex and hippocampus. Treatment with CGA and CAF protected against decreased viable neurons and BDNF depletion and prevented astrogliosis and microgliosis in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Molecular docking analyses showed that CGA and CAF strongly interact with the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and insulin receptors (IRS-1). These results suggest that the neuroprotective activity of CGA and CAF is related to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuronal integrity maintenance properties, highlighting their therapeutic or adjuvant potential for the treatment of SAD.
Article
Full-text available
There is a large literature on the effects of caffeine on performance. Most of the studies have been conducted in the laboratory and further information is required on the effects of caffeine consumption on performance and safety at work. The present studies aimed to determine whether the level of caffeine consumption influenced changes in alertness and performance over the working day. Secondary analyses of a large epidemiological database were also conducted to examine associations between caffeine consumption and cognitive failures and accidents at work. In the first study 110 volunteers, all of whom were regular caffeine consumers, rated their alertness and carried out a simple reaction time task before and after work on a Monday and Friday. Caffeine consumption during the day was recorded and volunteers were sub-divided into low and high consumers on the basis of a median split (220 mg/day). The second study involved secondary analyses of a database formed by combining the Bristol Stress and Health at Work and Cardiff Health and Safety at Work studies. In the first analyses associations between caffeine consumption and frequency of cognitive failures were examined in a sample of 1253 white-collar workers. The second set of analyses examined associations between caffeine consumption and accidents at work in a sample of 1555 workers who were especially at risk of having an accident. The results from the first study showed that those who consumed higher levels of caffeine reported significantly greater increases in alertness over the working day and a significantly smaller slowing of reaction time. The results from the second study demonstrated significant associations between caffeine consumption and fewer cognitive failures and accidents at work. After controlling for possible confounding factors it was found that higher caffeine consumption was associated with about half the risk of frequent/very frequent cognitive failures and a similar reduction in risk for accidents at work. Overall, the results from the three analyses show that caffeine consumption may have benefits for performance and safety at work.
Article
Full-text available
An experiment was carried out to examine the effects of 40 mg of caffeine given in different drinks (coffee, water, tea, cola) on mood and performance. One hundred and forty-four volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the groups formed by combining the caffeine/placebo and drinks conditions. Following a baseline session measuring mood and different aspects of performance, the volunteers were given their drink and then carried out another test session 1 h later. Administration of the caffeine/placebo was double-blind. The results showed that those given caffeine reported greater alertness and anxiety at the end of the test session, as well as improved performance on choice reaction time tasks involving focused attention and categoric search, a semantic memory task and a delayed recognition memory task. The effect of the caffeine was not modified by the nature of the drink in which it was given. Overall, these results show that a dose of caffeine typical of the level found in commercial products can improve alertness and performance efficiency. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
Full-text available
Caffeine is the most widely consumed centralnervous-system stimulant. Three main mechanisms of action of caffeine on the central nervous system have been described. Mobilization of intracellular calcium and inhibition of specific phosphodiesterases only occur at high non-physiological concentrations of caffeine. The only likely mechanism of action of the methylxanthine is the antagonism at the level of adenosine receptors. Caffeine increases energy metabolism throughout the brain but decreases at the same time cerebral blood flow, inducing a relative brain hypoperfusion. Caffeine activates noradrenaline neurons and seems to affect the local release of dopamine. Many of the alerting effects of caffeine may be related to the action of the methylxanthine on serotonine neurons. The methylxanthine induces dose-response increases in locomotor activity in animals. Its psychostimulant action on man is, however, often subtle and not very easy to detect. The effects of caffeine on learning, memory, performance and coordination are rather related to the methylxanthine action on arousal, vigilance and fatigue. Caffeine exerts obvious effects on anxiety and sleep which vary according to individual sensitivity to the methylxanthine. However, children in general do not appear more sensitive to methylxanthine effects than adults. The central nervous system does not seem to develop a great tolerance to the effects of caffeine although dependence and withdrawal symptoms are reported.
Article
Since the previous publication of Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines in 1997, there has been a substantial increase in evidence-based treatment options for bipolar disorder. The present guidelines review the new evidence and use criteria to rate strength of evidence and incorporate effectiveness, safety, and tolerability data to determine global clinical recommendations for treatment of various phases of bipolar disorder. The guidelines suggest that although pharmacotherapy forms the cornerstone of management, utilization of adjunctive psychosocial treatments and incorporation of chronic disease management model involving a healthcare team are required in providing optimal management for patients with bipolar disorder. Lithium, valproate and several atypical antipsychotics are first-line treatments for acute mania. Bipolar depression and mixed states are frequently associated with suicidal acts; therefore assessment for suicide should always be an integral part of managing any bipolar patient. Lithium, lamotrigine or various combinations of antidepressant and mood-stabilizing agents are first-line treatments for bipolar depression. First-line options in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder are lithium, lamotrigine, valproate and olanzapine. Historical and symptom profiles help with treatment selection. With the growing recognition of bipolar 11 disorders, it is anticipated that a larger body of evidence will become available to guide treatment of this common and disabling condition. These guidelines also discuss issues related to bipolar disorder in women and those with comorbidity and include a section on safety and monitoring.
Article
Los beneficios asociados a la ingesta de cafe se describie-ron por primera vez en 2 leyendas etiopes: una cuenta queun pastor perezoso de la region de Caffa empezo a tenercuidado de su rebano solo cuando comenzo a tomar granosde cafe; otra narra que la ingesta de cafe permitio sobreviviren el desierto al injustamente condenado Omar cuando lodesterraron del pueblo de Moises. Sin embargo, fueron losturcos los primeros en preparar infusiones de cafe, lo quese consideraba un secreto de Estado para cuyo manteni-miento se prohibio la exportacion del grano. Beber cafe tuvogran importancia para la civilizacion otomana, como atesti-gua una ley de 1475 que permitia a las mujeres conseguirel divorcio si sus maridos eran incapaces de proveerlas deuna cantidad diaria de cafe. En Europa, las bebidas con ca-feina se introdujeron por primera vez en Venecia gracias alpapa Clemente VII, que, encantado con las infusiones decafe, dio fin al anatema de considerarlo una bebida propiade infieles. Mas tarde el consumo de cafe se popularizo enEuropa debido a que los portugueses comerciaban con cafeen Amsterdam y establecieron en Brasil grandes plantacio-nes donde se generaba el 95% de la produccion mundialdecafe a finales del siglo
Article
Our aim was to observe the induction of anxiety symptoms and panic attacks by a caffeine challenge test in panic disorder (PD) patients (DSM-IV) and their healthy first-degree relatives. We randomly selected 25 PD patients, 27 healthy first-degree relatives of probands with PD, and 22 healthy volunteers with no family history of PD. In a randomized double-blind experiment performed over two occasions 7 days apart, 480 mg caffeine and a caffeine-free solution were administered in a coffee form. Using specific panic attack criteria, 52.0% (n=13) PD patients, 40.7% (n=11) first-degree relatives (χ2=1.81, df=1, P=0.179), and none of the control subjects had a panic attack after the test (χ2=51.7, df=2, P<0.001). In this caffeine challenge test, PD patients and their first-degree relatives were more sensitive than healthy volunteers to the panic attack symptoms but less sensitive to headache, increase in blood pressure, and insomnia. Our data suggest that there is an association between panic attacks after the intake of 480 mg of caffeine in PD patients and their first-degree relatives. There is a clear differentiation of PD patients and their first-degree relatives by a caffeine test from the healthy group. Depression and Anxiety, 2008. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Article
Chronic caffeine consumption has been inversely associated with the risk of developing Parkinson's disease. Here we assessed whether chronic caffeine treatment increases the resistance of male Wistar rats to haloperidol (1 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced catalepsy, measured in the bar test at 15 min intervals during 3 h. Caffeine (5 mg/kg/day) was delivered for 6 months via drinking water. Control rats received only tap water. Treatments began when animals were 3–4 months old. In order to unveil long-lasting catalepsy refractoriness not attributable to the presence of caffeine in the brains of rats, they were evaluated from day 18 to day 27 after caffeine withdrawal, a time that is far in excess for the full excretion of a caffeine dose in this species. The average cataleptic immobility measured in caffeine-treated rats (n = 23) was 1148 ± 140 s, a value 34 ± 8% lower than that recorded in control animals (n = 20), whose mean immobility was 1736 ± 137 s (P = 0.0026, t-test). The percentage of catalepsy reduction measured in caffeine-treated rats evaluated on days 18–20 after caffeine discontinuation (−32 ± 13%, n = 12, P < 0.05) was comparable to the catalepsy decrease recorded in those animals tested on days 21–27 (−36 ± 10%, n = 11, P < 0.02), a finding compatible with the notion that the effect was indeed mediated by enduring changes of brain functioning and not by the physical presence of caffeine or its metabolites. Caffeine-treated rats also had higher catalepsy latency scores compared with control rats (P < 0.01, U-test). The present findings show that chronic consumption of caffeine produces perdurable resistance to catalepsy induced by dopamine receptor blockade, possibly through enhancement of dopamine transmission, giving further support to the epidemiological results indicating that prolonged caffeine consumption affords neuroprotection against Parkinson's disease.
Article
Variation in the candidate genes adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR), catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT), and norepinephrine transporter (NET) has been suggested to influence vulnerability to panic disorder. We therefore investigated patients with another anxiety disorder with an even higher heritability, the blood-injury phobia, for association of these variants and used sympathetic measures during venipuncture, which serve as a naturalistic trigger of anxiety and autonomic hyperarousal, as an intermediate phenotype of anxiety. Patients homozygous for the A2AR 1976T allele as compared to patients carrying at least one 1976C allele exhibited a significantly increased respiratory rate with a trend towards elevated measures of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and respiratory minute volume. None of the sympathetic measures were influenced by the COMT or NET polymorphisms. This study provides preliminary data suggesting an influence of the A2AR 1976C/T polymorphism on sympathetic psychophysiological indicators of anxiety-related arousal in blood-injury phobia and thereby further supports a role of the A2AR gene in the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders.
Article
A proportion of patients with panic disorder (PD) display an increased sensitivity to the anxiogenic/panicogenic properties of caffeine. The aim of this study is to identify probable baseline differences between PD patients who panic and those who do not, after caffeine administration. In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over experiment performed in two occasions 3-7 days apart, 200 and 400 mg of caffeine, respectively, were administered in a coffee form to 23 patients with PD with or without Agoraphobia. Evaluations included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the DSM-IV 'panic attack' symptoms (visual analogue scale form), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), as well as breath-holding (BH) duration, heartbeat perception accuracy and heart rate. Only those patients who did not present a panic attack after both challenges ('no panic group', N=14, 66.7%), and those who presented a panic attack after at least one challenge ('panic group', n=7, 33.3%) were included in the analysis. The panickers, compared to the non-panickers, presented at baseline: significantly higher total score of the SCL-90-R; significantly higher scores on all the SCL-90-R clusters of symptoms, except that of 'paranoid ideation'; significantly lower BH duration. The present preliminary findings indicate that PD patients who panic after a 200 mg or a 400 mg caffeine challenge, compared to the PD patients who do not panic after both of these challenges, may present at baseline significantly higher non-specific general psychopathology--as reflected in the SCL-90-R--and significantly shorter BH duration.