A Tissue Microarray-based Comparative Analysis of Novel and Traditional Immunohistochemical Markers in the Distinction Between Adrenal Cortical Lesions and Pheochromocytoma
We have encountered an increasing number of image-guided adrenal mass biopsies in which the differential diagnosis is adrenal cortical lesion versus pheochromocytoma. This distinction is sometimes difficult because of confounding clinical presentations, overlapping morphologies, and some degree of immunophenotypic overlap including focal staining with markers of purported lineage specificity. Interventional radiologists commonly use narrow gauge biopsy needles in this setting, which yield scant diagnostic tissue and further complicate pathologic evaluation. In this study, a detailed immunoprofile of 63 adrenal cortical lesions (3 adrenal rests, 6 adrenal cortical hyperplasias, 43 adrenal cortical adenomas, 4 adrenal cortical neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential, and 7 adrenal cortical carcinomas) was compared with 35 pheochromocytomas using traditional (calretinin, chromogranin, inhibin, melanA, and synaptophysin) and novel [steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), microtubule-associated protein 2, and mammalian achaete-scute homolog-1] antibodies, using tissue microarray technology to simulate small image-guided biopsies. Staining extent and intensity were each scored semiquantitatively for each antibody. A comparison of sensitivity and specificity using different intensity thresholds required for a "positive" result (> or = 1+ vs. > or = 2+) was performed. Staining results based on a > or = 1+ and (> or = 2+) intensity threshold were as follows: calretinin-95% (89%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 14% (0%) in pheochromocytomas; chromogranin-0% in adrenal cortical lesions and 100% in pheochromocytomas; inhibin-97% (86%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 6% (0%) in pheochromocytomas; microtubule-associated protein 2-29% (16%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 100% (89%) in pheochromocytomas; mammalian achaete-scute homolog-1-0% in both adrenal cortical lesions and pheochromocytomas; melanA-94% (86%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 6% (0%) in pheochromocytomas; SF-1-87% (86%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 0% in pheochromocytomas; synaptophysin-67% (59%) in adrenal cortical lesions and 100% in pheochromocytomas. Using an antibody panel consisting of chromogranin plus the nuclear antibody SF-1 and either calretinin or inhibin, while requiring a high-staining intensity threshold, helps to eliminate interpretative issues of artifactual or background reactivity, improves diagnostic sensitivity/specificity, and makes for an effective immunohistochemical approach in distinguishing adrenal cortical lesions from pheochromocytomas.
Available from: Michael D Feldman
- "Supporting that our present case of an oncocytic neoplasm is of an adrenocortical origin is the strong immunohistochemical staining for inhibin and Melan-A. Adrenal cortex is an endocrine organ and is known to express some of the neuroendocrine markers such as synaptophysin and NSE; however, negative chromogranin staining in our case further supports the adrenal cortical origin rather than the adrenal medulla . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Functioning adrenal adenomas are well-described entities that can rarely occur outside the adrenal gland in the ectopic adrenal tissue. Similarly, myelolipoma is an another benign lesion of the adrenal tissue which can rarely occur outside the adrenal gland. We report the first case of a testosterone producing an extra-adrenal adrenocortical oncocytoma accompanied by a myelolipoma. The patient presented with virilization and elevated androgen levels. Imaging revealed a retroperitoneal mass, which histologically consisted of oncocytes and intermingled myelolipoma. Postoperative androgen levels decreased to normal. The tumor cells were strongly positive for inhibin and Melan-A, supporting the adrenal origin. This case demonstrates a diagnostic challenge in which correlation with histology, immunohistochemistry, and serum endocrine studies led to the final diagnosis.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The electricity distribution planning problem consists of deciding which facilities (injection points and feeders) to construct to meet future injections. The uncertainty on future demands and independent producers' injections in the distribution network introduce additional difficulties to the problem. This paper presents a framework to cope with the uncertainties, resulting from natural resources producers (mini-hydro and wind generation), based on fuzzy descriptions of the dispersed generation injections, leading to detailed models to be used in planning tools. The models considered include basic uncertainty and linguistic modifiers when extra information, from experts, is available. The approach proposed is useful both for operation and planning purposes
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hemangioblastoma is a benign tumor that can occur sporadically, or in association with von Hippel-Lindau disease in approximately one-quarter of the cases. Only exceptionally does it occur outside the central nervous system. This report describes 2 cases of sporadic renal hemangioblastoma, with 1 patient presenting with hematuria and polycythemia, and the other low back pain. Histologically, the tumors were circumscribed, and composed of sheets of large polygonal cells traversed by arborizing thin-walled blood vessels. Many of the tumor cells showed pleomorphic nuclei, but the mitotic figures were rare. The cytoplasm was eosinophilic, and occasionally finely vacuolated indicating the presence of lipid. The diagnosis of hemangioblastoma was confirmed by negative immunostaining for cytokeratin, and positive staining for α-inhibin, S100, and neuron-specific enolase. This benign neoplasm which can be mistaken for various malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma, epithelioid angiomyolipoma, adrenal cortical carcinoma, and paraganglioma, deserves wider recognition for its occurrence as a primary renal tumor.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.