Classification of Eating Disturbance in Children and Adolescents: Proposed Changes for the DSM-V

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
European Eating Disorders Review (Impact Factor: 2.46). 03/2010; 18(2):79-89. DOI: 10.1002/erv.994
Source: PubMed


Childhood and adolescence are critical periods of neural development and physical growth. The malnutrition and related medical complications resulting from eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) and eating disorder not otherwise specified may have more severe and potentially more protracted consequences during youth than during other age periods. The consensus opinion of an international workgroup of experts on the diagnosis and treatment of child and adolescent eating disorders is that (a) lower and more developmentally sensitive thresholds of symptom severity (e.g. lower frequency of purging behaviours, significant deviations from growth curves as indicators of clinical severity) be used as diagnostic boundaries for children and adolescents, (b) behavioural indicators of psychological features of eating disorders be considered even in the absence of direct self-report of such symptoms and (c) multiple informants (e.g. parents) be used to ascertain symptom profiles. Collectively, these recommendations will permit earlier identification and intervention to prevent the exacerbation of eating disorder symptoms.

Download full-text


Available from: Dasha Nicholls
  • Source
    • "Such measures, which although currently awaiting tests of reliability and validity , may move towards addressing the deficiencies in our field in assessing the eating disorder pathology of adolescents in FBT. They may also lie in accordance with broader changes to be introduced in DSM-5, which allow for more behavioural indicants of the psychological features of AN (Bravender et al., 2011). Thus, we recommend that future research trials adopt measures which index parental reports of their child's eating disorder pathology. "

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014
  • Source
    • "For example, beyond objective binge eating as defined in the DSM criteria of BED (i.e., loss of control over eating a significantly large amount of food) [2], a substantial proportion of adolescents report subjective binge eating that is not part of the DSM diagnostic criteria of BED (i.e., loss of control over eating a subjectively large amount of food), but is psychopathologically relevant [4,6] (both types of binge eating are hereafter referred to as binge eating). In addition, lowered diagnostic thresholds have been proposed for the diagnosis of BED in youth [7,8]. Subthreshold BED was found to be associated with marked impairment and increased risk of developing a full-syndrome presentation over time [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Binge eating disorder is a prevalent adolescent disorder, associated with increased eating disorder and general psychopathology as well as an increased risk for overweight and obesity. As opposed to binge eating disorder in adults, there is a lack of validated psychological treatments for this condition in adolescents. The goal of this research project is therefore to determine the efficacy of age-adapted cognitive-behavioral therapy in adolescents with binge eating disorder -- the gold standard treatment for adults with binge eating disorder.Methods/design: In a single-center efficacy trial, 60 12- to 20-year-old adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria of binge eating disorder (full-syndrome or subthreshold) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th or 5th Edition, will be centrally randomized to 4 months of cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 30) or a waiting-list control condition (n = 30). Using an observer-blind design, patients are assessed at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups after the end of treatment. In 20 individual outpatient sessions, cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescents focuses on eating behavior, body image, and stress; parents receive psychoeducation on these topics. Primary endpoint is the number of episodes with binge eating over the previous 28 days at post-treatment using a state-of-the art clinical interview. Secondary outcome measures address the specific eating disorder psychopathology, general psychopathology, mental comorbidity, self-esteem, quality of life, and body weight. This trial will allow us to determine the short- and long-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy in adolescent binge eating disorder, to determine cost-effectiveness, and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. Evidence will be gathered regarding whether this treatment will help to prevent excessive weight gain. If efficacy can be demonstrated, the results from this trial will enhance availability of evidence-based treatment of adolescent binge eating disorder.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00000542.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013 · Trials
  • Source
    • "There is nothing surprising about this latter finding. Evidence from epidemiological studies has consistently shown that, among individuals with bulimic-type eating disorders, the experience of loss of control over eating is a better predictor of distress and disability than the amount of food consumed [1,14,55-60]. This evidence calls into question the validity of the DSM definition of binge eating, which requires not only a loss of control over eating but consumption of an objectively large amount of food. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proposed changes to the classification of bulimic-type eating disorders in the lead up to the publication of DSM-5 are reviewed. Several of the proposed changes, including according formal diagnostic status to binge eating disorder (BED), removing the separation of bulimia nervosa (BN) into purging and non-purging subtypes, and reducing the binge frequency threshold from twice per week to once per week for both BN and (BED), have considerable empirical evidence to support them and will likely have the effect of facilitating clinical practice, improving access to care, improving public and professional awareness and understanding of these disorders and stimulating the additional research needed to address at least some problematic issues. However, the omission of any reference to variants of BN characterized by subjective, but not objective, binge eating episodes, and to the undue influence of weight or shape on self-evaluation or similar cognitive criterion in relation to the diagnosis of BED, is regrettable, given their potential to inform clinical and research practice and given that there is considerable evidence to support specific reference to these distinctions. Other aspects of the proposed criteria, such as retention of behavioral indicators of impaired control associated with binge eating and the presence of marked distress regarding binge eating among the diagnostic for BED, appear anomalous in that there is little or no evidence to support their validity or clinical utility. It is hoped that these issues will be addressed in final phase of the DSM-5 development process.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2013 · International Journal of Eating Disorders
Show more