In-Hospital Death of Critically III Patients Who Have Congestive Heart Failure: Does Size of Hospital Matter?

ArticleinAmerican Journal of Medical Quality 25(2):95-101 · February 2010with12 Reads
DOI: 10.1177/1062860609353202 · Source: PubMed
Abstract
Data from the British Columbia Linked Health Database were analyzed to determine if size of hospital is associated with in-hospital death of critically ill adults whose admitting diagnosis is congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients who were <19 years of age, transferred from or to other hospitals, or who developed CHF as a complication were excluded. In unadjusted logistic regression analysis of 2616 patients, the odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital death associated with a doubling of the number of hospital beds was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.23; P = .01). After adjustment for age, sex, CHF-specific comorbidity index, number of cardiac and noncardiac procedures, number of hospital admissions for CHF in the preceding year, and socioeconomic variables, the OR was 1.08 (95% CI = 0.96-1.20; P = .21). The conclusion is that the adjusted rate of in-hospital deaths for this patient group does not differ significantly based solely on the number of acute hospital beds.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To describe the clinical management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in patients receiving intravenous treatment with dobutamine, milrinone, or nesiritide, and to evaluate differences, based on treatment received, in the in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), total health care costs, and 30-day hospital readmission rate. Retrospective cohort analysis. University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database Pharmacy, a database with information from 32 academic hospitals. Two thousand one hundred thirty patients with ADHF who received dobutamine (1311 patients), milrinone (433), or nesiritide (386). Patients with ADHF were categorized according to the vasoactive therapy received. To evaluate baseline characteristics, chi(2) analysis was used; logistic regression was employed to assess the relationships between drug therapy and in-hospital mortality rates, and multivariate linear regression was used to assess whether drug therapy was related to LOS and total health care costs. All regression analyses controlled for age, sex, race, region of the United States where the hospital was located, primary payer for the hospital stay, UHC patient severity class, and chronic renal failure. In-hospital mortality rates were 10.2%, 7.9%, and 2.9% in the dobutamine, milrinone, and nesiritide groups, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted odds ratio for death of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.8) for dobutamine and 3.9 (95% CI 1.8-8.3) for milrinone (p<0.0001). Compared with inotropic therapy (dobutamine and milrinone), mean LOS in the hospital and the intensive care unit were lower with nesiritide (p<0.001). Total health care costs were lowest with nesiritide, but this reached statistical significance only when compared with milrinone (p<0.001). Thirty-day hospital readmission rates with dobutamine, milrinone, and nesiritide were 5.0%, 9.5%, and 3.9%, respectively (p=NS). Nesiritide therapy was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality rate and shorter LOS compared with dobutamine and milrinone. In addition, total health care costs with nesiritide were decreased compared with milrinone. These observations need to be validated by a randomized controlled trial.
    Article · Aug 2006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: An increased volume of patients is associated with improved survival in numerous high-risk medical and surgical conditions. The relationship between the number of patients admitted (hospital volume) and outcome among patients with critical illnesses is unknown. We analyzed data from 20,241 nonsurgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation at 37 acute care hospitals in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation clinical information system from 2002 through 2003. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for the severity of illness and other differences in the case mix. An increase in hospital volume was associated with improved survival among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital. Admission to a hospital in the highest quartile according to volume (i.e., >400 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year) was associated with a 37 percent reduction in the adjusted odds of death in the ICU as compared with admission to hospitals in the lowest quartile (< or =150 patients receiving mechanical ventilation per year, P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was similarly reduced (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.83; P<0.001). A typical patient in a hospital in a low-volume quartile would have an adjusted in-hospital mortality of 34.2 percent as compared with 25.5 percent in a hospital in a high-volume quartile. Among survivors, there were no significant trends in the length of stay in the ICU or the hospital. Mechanical ventilation of patients in a hospital with a high case volume is associated with reduced mortality. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism of the relationship between volume and outcome among patients with a critical illness.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: We sought to describe the relation between left ventricular systolic function and rates of hospital readmission and survival among consecutively hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure. Medical records were reviewed for these patients at an academic medical center between Jan. 1, 1992, and Dec. 31, 1993. Left ventricular systolic function assessments performed within 6 months before discharge were used to classify left ventricular systolic function. Hospital readmission rates and survival through Dec. 31, 1994, were compared between patients with systolic dysfunction and those with preserved systolic function. Among 412 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure, 224 had undergone a left ventricular function assessment during the 6 months before hospital discharge. In-hospital mortality and readmission rates were higher among patients without a recent assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Of patients with systolic dysfunction, 55% versus 41% of patients with preserved systolic function were either readmitted or had an emergency room visit within 6 months after discharge (p = 0.06). At 27 months' follow-up, cumulative survival probabilities were 65% for patients with preserved systolic function, 65% for patients with systolic dysfunction, and 60% for patients without a left ventricular systolic function assessment (p = 0.24). Patients without a recent left ventricular systolic function assessment have significantly higher hospital readmission rates than patients with a recent systolic function assessment. Among hospitalized patients, mortality rates are comparable between patients with systolic dysfunction and those with preserved systolic function. However, patients with heart failure with systolic dysfunction may have higher readmission rates.
    Article · Nov 1997
Show more

Recommended publications

Discover more