Article

Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines

CellBank Australia - Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.09). 07/2010; 127(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25242
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Continuous cell lines consist of cultured cells derived from a specific donor and tissue of origin that have acquired the ability to proliferate indefinitely. These cell lines are well-recognized models for the study of health and disease, particularly for cancer. However, there are cautions to be aware of when using continuous cell lines, including the possibility of contamination, in which a foreign cell line or microorganism is introduced without the handler's knowledge. Cross-contamination, in which the contaminant is another cell line, was first recognized in the 1950s but, disturbingly, remains a serious issue today. Many cell lines become cross-contaminated early, so that subsequent experimental work has been performed only on the contaminant, masquerading under a different name. What can be done in response-how can a researcher know if their own cell lines are cross-contaminated? Two practical responses are suggested here. First, it is important to check the literature, looking for previous work on cross-contamination. Some reports may be difficult to find and to make these more accessible, we have compiled a list of known cross-contaminated cell lines. The list currently contains 360 cell lines, drawn from 68 references. Most contaminants arise within the same species, with HeLa still the most frequently encountered (29%, 106/360) among human cell lines, but interspecies contaminants account for a small but substantial minority of cases (9%, 33/360). Second, even if there are no previous publications on cross-contamination for that cell line, it is essential to check the sample itself by performing authentication testing.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John R Masters, Sep 22, 2014
  • Source
    • "This is true even under the most rigorous operational standards such as those employed in the maintenance of mammalian tissue culture. For example , 360 known cross-contaminated or misidentified human cell lines have been identified and many of these have been used for published research [18]. This further underscores the importance of bioinformatics data for rapid identification and correction of such errors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Algal research has the potential to address numerous industrial and environmental challenges. Despite this potential, informatics data for algae are relatively modest limiting the development of algal biotechnology. This study reports on the re-classification of the green algae strain UTEX 2341 as a case study demonstrating the need for improved public informatics data for algae. Observations in the literature from lipid and pigment research led to uncertainty surrounding the identity of UTEX 2341, originally classified as Chlorella minutissima. In this study, lipid and conserved-gene sequencing data were combined to establish the identity of UTEX 2341 as Auxenochlorella protothecoides. Unambiguous identification of strains that are maintained over long periods of time will require sufficient allocation of resources to culture collections. Furthermore, development of repositories for biochemical and physiological data, along with DNA sequence information, are needed to facilitate sharing of strain data between research institutions and culture collections.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Algal Research
  • Source
    • "All these initiatives involve cultures grown in serum, which do not demonstrate the phenotypic properties of the tumor of origin. Furthermore, the origin of several of the cell lines has been questioned; in several instances STR profiling has revealed cross contamination or misidentification of established cell lines, including several GBM lines (Capes-Davis et al., 2010). Finally, for most of the publically available cell lines associated clinical data are lacking, which further reduces their value. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and malignant form of primary brain tumor. GBM is essentially incurable and its resistance to therapy is attributed to a subpopulation of cells called glioma stem cells (GSCs). To meet the present shortage of relevant GBM cell (GC) lines we developed a library of annotated and validated cell lines derived from surgical samples of GBM patients, maintained under conditions to preserve GSC characteristics. This collection, which we call the Human Glioblastoma Cell Culture (HGCC) resource, consists of a biobank of 48 GC lines and an associated database containing high-resolution molecular data. We demonstrate that the HGCC lines are tumorigenic, harbor genomic lesions characteristic of GBMs, and represent all four transcriptional subtypes. The HGCC panel provides an open resource for in vitro and in vivo modeling of a large part of GBM diversity useful to both basic and translational GBM research.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · EBioMedicine
  • Source
    • "Additionally, many laboratories (including ours) have used these cells in research and published many papers in international journals. However, it has been reported that the HSG cells used in this study were contaminated with HeLa cells [40, 41]. It will be necessary to consider the alternative cell line used for the particle beam facility experiments in the future. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the clinic, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) value of 1.1 has usually been used in relation to the whole depth of the spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP) of proton beams. The aim of this study was to confirm the actual biological effect in the SOBP at the very distal end of clinical proton beams using an in vitro cell system. A human salivary gland tumor cell line, HSG, was irradiated with clinical proton beams (accelerated by 190 MeV/u) and examined at different depths in the distal part and the center of the SOBP. Surviving fractions were analyzed with the colony formation assay. Cell survival curves and the survival parameters were obtained by fitting with the linear-quadratic (LQ) model. The RBE at each depth of the proton SOBP compared with that for X-rays was calculated by the biological equivalent dose, and the biological dose distribution was calculated from the RBE and the absorbed dose at each position. Although the physical dose distribution was flat in the SOBP, the RBE values calculated by the equivalent dose were significantly higher (up to 1.56 times) at the distal end than at the center of the SOBP. Additionally, the range of the isoeffective dose was extended beyond the range of the SOBP (up to 4.1 mm). From a clinical point of view, this may cause unexpected side effects to normal tissues at the distal position of the beam. It is important that the beam design and treatment planning take into consideration the biological dose distribution.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · Journal of Radiation Research
Show more