Content uploaded by Jason R Ali
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jason R Ali
Content may be subject to copyright.
LETTERS
Mammalian biodiversity on Madagascar controlled
by ocean currents
Jason R. Ali
1
& Matthew Huber
2
Madagascarhosts one of the world’s most unusual, endemic,diverse
and threatened concentrations of fauna
1
. To explain its unique,
imbalanced biological diversity, G. G. Simpson proposed the
‘sweepstakes hypothesis’, according to which the ancestors of
Madagascar’s present-day mammal stock rafted there from
Africa
2
. This is an important hypothesis in biogeography and evolu-
tionary theory for how animals colonize new frontiers
1,3–5
, but its
validity is questioned
5–9
. Studies suggest that currents were in-
consistent with rafting to Madagascar
9
and that land bridges provided
the migrants’ passage
5–8
. Here we show that currents could have
transported the animals to the island and highlight evidence in-
consistent with the land-bridge hypothesis. Using palaeogeographic
reconstructions and palaeo-oceanographic modelling, we find that
strong surface currents flowed from northeast Mozambique and
Tanzania eastward towards Madagascar during the Palaeogene
period, exactly as required by the ‘sweepstakes process’. Sub-
sequently, Madagascar advanced north towards the equatorial gyre
and the regional current system evolved into its modern configura-
tion with flows westward
10
from Madagascar to Africa. This may
explain why no fully non-aquatic land mammals have colonized
Madagascar since the arrival of the rodents and carnivorans during
the early-Miocene epoch. One implication is that rafting may be the
dominant means of overseas dispersal in the Cenozoic era when
palaeocurrent directions are properly considered.
Madagascar is home to one of the most intriguing inventories of
flora and fauna anywhere on Earth
1
. It is characterized by unusually
high levels of mammalian endemism combined with a uniquely broad
diversity from a limited number of orders: lemurs, tenrecs, carnivorans
and rodents
1,11–13
. Although our focus here is primarily on mammals,
similar patterns are observed for other terrestrial animals on the island,
includingamphibians and reptiles
14,15
, implying a broadly similar colo-
nization mechanism. It is widely acknowledged that Madagascar’s
mammals arederived from Cenozoic migrants becausethey share none
of the detailed characteristics of the island’s late-Cretaceous forms
16,17
and thus could not have evolved from them. The current stock’s
ancestors journeyed from Africa at various times during the
Cenozoic, since 65 Myr ago, and each colonization appears to be the
result of a single arrival event
1
. The timing of apparent arrival events of
new taxa is a fundamental constraint on hypotheses about how they
accomplished the journey
1
. From molecular-clock dating estimates, it
is possible to discern four distinct early-Cenozoic to mid-Cenozoic
events: the arrival of lemurs between 60 and 50 Myr ago, that of tenrecs
between 42 and 25 Myr ago,that of carnivorans between 26 and 19 Myr
ago, and that of rodents between 24 and 20 Myr ago
12,13
.Thus,by
,20 Myr ago the major non-volant and non-swimming faunal groups
were established, with no further evidence of transfer, except for a few
late-Quaternary arrivals such as the pygmy hippopotamus, which is
semi-aquatic and known to swim significant ocean distances
18
.As
Madagascar and Africa have been separated for ,120 Myr by the
430-km-wide Mozambique Channel
19,20
, the question is whether the
non-volant, non-aquatic migrants made their way to the island by
walking or by rafting.
One hypothesis is that land bridges might have enabled fauna to
walk. It has been argued that substantial portions of the Davie
Ridge—a prominent bathymetric feature running north–south
down the middle of the Mozambique Channel (Fig. 1)—may have
once been sub-aerially exposed and thus could have acted as a quasi-
continuous causeway linking Africa and Madagascar
8
. Although this
idea has received some support
5–7,21
, important weaknesses are
acknowledged because it would require a radical rethinking of regional
plate tectonics
22
. It also suffers logical flaws: if land bridges were
responsible, a greater variety of animals would have crossed and the
timing of arrivals would be correlated with the putative maximum
extent of the land bridge, neither of which results is supported by
data
1,23
. We further note that any islands the Davie Ridge may have
generated during the Cenozoic
23
would have been small and separated
by open-water gaps several tens to hundreds of kilometres apart
24
(Fig. 1). Consequently, substantial tracts of ocean (.230 km) sepa-
rated them from the nearest land in eastern Mozambique and western
Madagascar; thus, over-water dispersal was unavoidable.
The over-water dispersal mechanism was first mooted by Simpson
nearly seventy yearsago
2
. He proposeda ‘sweepstakes’ process by which
small mammals—potentiallywith low metabolicrates and/or a habit of
seasonal torpor—were unwittingly rafted to the island on large logs or
vegetation mats washed off eastern Africa, either down large rivers or
from the coastal strip
25
. Key predictions of Simpson’s argument, con-
firmed by thecolonization-history andgeological datadescribed above,
are the limited number of families that live on the island today, in
particular the absence of large-bodied forms (for example antelopes,
apes, elephants or lions), and the seemingly random distribution of
apparent arrivals in Madagascar from ,60 to ,20 Myr ago.
The main criticism of this hypothesis is that inferred currents and
prevailing winds, based on modern observations, are in the opposite
direction to those required. As elucidated in ref. 9, if today’s surface-
water currents in the region are used as a guide (Fig. 1), the strong
south-southwest-directed coast-parallel flow of the Mozambique
Current would have acted as barrier to eastward transport. Rafts
off the shore of Africa would have been entrained in the southward
flow and thus could never have beached on Madagascar. Instead they
would either return to the African shore or be transported north or
south, but never substantially to the east. No quantitative attempts
have been made to estimate how currents in the region may have been
different in the Cenozoic or what implications this may have for
ocean dispersal routes. Past currents remain the major unknown in
this controversial issue and many factors, including changing palaeo-
geographic and palaeo-oceanographic setting, must be considered.
1
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
2
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department and the Purdue Climate Change Research
Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Vol 463
|
4 February 2010
|
doi:10.1038/nature08706
653
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
©2010
The Indian Ocean basin has altered considerably as a result of plate
tectonics. For instance, since 60 Myr ago Australia and India have
respectively migrated ,2,200 and ,4,000 km northwards. Globally,
six major ocean gateways have either opened (Tasman–Antarctica,
South America/Antarctica, Atlantic–Arctic) or closed (Panama
Isthmus, Indonesian, Africa–Arabia–Eurasia). Critically, Africa and
Madagascar have both moved some 15u(,1,650 km) closer to the
equator
20
. Thus, the potential for surface-water flow in the southwest
Indian Ocean to have been markedly different when the faunas are
thought to have crossed to Madagascar must be considered.
Today, the entire southern Indian Ocean, from Africa to Australia,
lies within a large anticyclonic ‘supergyre’
26
. Northern Madagascar
lies at the boundary between this gyre and a cyclonic gyre occupying
the northern Indian Ocean
26,27
. The southern Indian Ocean gyre’s
strongest flows are to the southwest of Madagascar, where they form
the Agulhas current. A relatively strong eddying flow in the
Mozambique Channel between Madagascar and Africa connects
the gyre’s equatorial currents with the vigorous transports of the
Agulhas system
27
. Another important feature of the southern Indian
Ocean gyre concerns the fact that Australia spans the latitudes
Madagascar does. As a consequence, the zonally integrated wind stress
curl, which drives the circulation, is maximized near the southern tip
of Africa
27
.
To test the hypothesis that changes in the ocean circulation around
Madagascar during the Cenozoic explain the observed pattern of
land-mammal migrations to the island, an independent knowledge
of surface ocean currents and surface wind stress is required. The only
means of obtaining this information (as there are no independent
proxy records for these variables) is from palaeo-oceanographic
modelling. We performed and analysed a suite of experiments using
a fully and interactively coupled ocean–atmosphere general circula-
tion model (the Community Climate System Model, version 3
(CCSM3), of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research) with
Eocene conditions (Methods). In such models, climate, wind and
surface-water currents are predicted and, importantly, are free to
evolve according to the equations of motion and thermodynamics.
Thus, we have not specified the winds or sea surface temperatures
that drive them, nor the ocean currents.
In all of our simulations, the large-scale ocean current systems in the
Eocene epoch were robustly different from modern observed and
modelled circulations in several crucial ways relevant to the rafting
problem. Africa and Madagascar were .10usouth of their current
positions, which placed Madagascar in the convergence zone at the
heart of the subtropical gyre (Fig. 2). Furthermore, because Australia
was also much further south, the northern part of that continent did
not impede the accumulation of wind stress curl at the latitudes of
Madagascar; therefore, the strongest current system in the entire
Southern Ocean was just to the east of Madagascar (Fig. 2a). This
vigorous eddy off the coast of Madagascar caused water-mass
trajectories throughout the region to converge.
As shown in Fig. 2a, the strong anticlockwise gyre directed much of
the flow along the African coast eastward towards Madagascar rather
than southward through the Mozambique Channel, towards the
Agulhas Current, as occurs today. Peak simulated eastward velocities
across the Mozambique Channel usually occur in January (Fig. 2b),
and monthly mean velocities of .10 cm s
21
occur for three to four
months within each century of simulation. Trajectories starting in the
region of northeast Mozambique and Tanzania sporadically experi-
ence enhanced eastward velocities of .20 cm s
21
and could therefore
have crossed the necessary distance in 25–30 days (Fig. 2c). This vigo-
rous eastward flow was not constant, occurring for only three or four
weeks within any century of simulation. Hence, on the long timescales
of relevance to this problem (tens of millions of years), these velocities
would have occurred many times, but not routinely. Because these are
rare events, it is likely that even faster eastward currents occurred,
albeit less frequently. Furthermore, flow through the Mozambique
Channel was probably strongly eddying, as it is today, but our simula-
tions do not have sufficient resolution to capture the vigorous, high-
kinetic-energy properties of these eddies, which today have velocities
of ,100 cm s
21
(ref. 27). Capturing such mesoscale variability would
Seychelles
Madagascar
Mascarene
basin
Africa
Comoros
islands
Réunion
Madagascar
basin
Western Somali
basin
Davie Ridge
highs
Land 0–200 m 200–2,000 m 2,000–4,000 m >4,000 m
Mozambique
basin
Madagascar
Ridge
Mozambique
Plateau
Mozambique
Channel
10° S
20° S
30° S
0°
60° E30° E 40° E 50° E
a
13.00° S
41.40° E
19.70° S
41.90° E
0
1,000
Depth (m)
2,000
3,000
~750 km
Macua
seamount
Sakalave
seamounts
Paisley
seamount
c
30° E
Seychelles
Madagascar
10° S
20° S
Latitude
Longitude
30° S
0°
40° E 50° E 60° E
East
Madagascar
Current (S)
East African
Coastal Current
Agulhas
Current
South
Equatorial
Current
R
M
Mozam-
bique
Tanzania
Kenya
South
Africa
Mozambique
Current
Current ow
b
Figure 1
|
Key geographical features/phenomena of the southwest Indian
Ocean region. a, Simplified bathymetric map. b, Present-day surface-water
circulation based on refs 25 and26 (M, Mauritius; R, Re
´union).
c, Bathymetric cross-section along the Davie Ridge. Even in the Eocene,
when parts of the feature may have been sub-aerial, the deep troughs
23
separating the peaks would have posed formidable barriers
22
.
LETTERS NATURE
|
Vol 463
|
4 February 2010
654
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
©2010
only increase the estimated probability of the occasional very vigorous
eastward transport from Africa to Madagascar, and would enhance
transport across the Mozambique Channel in jet-like currents.
Consequently, our speed estimate is almost certainly lower than the
true maximum eastward rafting velocity.
An additional consideration is the fact that tropical storms are
known to generate the large, floating tree ‘islands’, as well as asso-
ciated precipitation, that might make a successful ocean voyage of
this type possible
4
. It is therefore noteworthy that preliminary ana-
lysis of modelled tropical cyclone activity indicates that this region
was a locus of such activity, as it is today, and that the tropical cyclone
season encompasses the period of highly favourable ocean currents
(January). Thus, successful rafting may have involved the fortuitous
coincidence of transient storms and ocean current activity.
Thus, all signs point to the Simpson sweepstakes model being
correct: ocean currents could have occasionally transported rafts of
animals to Madagascar from Africa during the Eocene. Specifically,
transport should have been from northeast Mozambique and
Tanzania to the north coast of Madagascar. Given the slow tectonic
drift of the island, this configuration probably continued at least
through the Oligocene epoch. However, by the early Miocene,
Madagascar breached the margin of the subtropical and equatorial
gyres. Thereafter, currents were perennially directed westward
towards Africa, making the ocean journey for mammals to
Madagascar much more difficult, if not impossible.
METHODS SUMMARY
We used the current version of the fully coupled (ocean/atmosphere/land/
vegetation/sea ice) global climate model CCSM3. The atmospheric resolution
was set at ,3.75u?3.75u(T31 spectral resolution); the oceans had a nominal 3u
longitudinal resolution (and variable latitudinal resolution) and 25 vertical
levels. This model has been applied to a wide variety of modern
28
and palaeo-
climate studies, for example of the Holocene epoch and the Last Glacial
Maximum
29
and the Eocene
30
.
We carried out a suite of fully coupled simulations for a simulated time of
more than 3,000 yr without any acceleration until they had clearly reached equi-
librium. A description of the suite of simulations is found in ref. 30; results from
Longitude
Latitude
Longitude
Current strength (cm s–1)
b
Mad Mad
Africa Africa
a
0°
–70
10° S
15° S
20° S
25° S
30° S
35° S
40° S
20° E 30° E 40° E 50° E 60° E 20° E
–30 –10 10 30
20 cm s–1 30° E 40° E 50° E 60° E
10° S
15° S
20° S
25° S
30° S
35° S
40° S
–30 10 50
90° E 180°
Volume ux (Sv)
c
Figure 2
|
Eocene ocean currents. a, Simulated annual mean vertically
averaged (barotropic) currents (volume flux) and surface ocean currents
(streamline vectors). The barotropic currents delineate the average positions
of the major Eocene ocean gyres, with Madagascar at the heart of the
strongest gyre on Earth, as described in the text. The modern location of
Madagascar is shown in red outline, showing how the interplay of
continental position and the gyres controls dispersal pathways. b, Ensemble-
averaged monthly mean ocean surface currents for January, the month in
which climatological ocean current directions were optimal for transport
towards Madagascar. c, During sporadic events, as typified by this ensemble
average of the four optimal ocean current events evaluated from model
output saved at a temporal resolution of three days, rapid transport directly
to Madagascar from Africa was possible at rates of .20 cm s
21
. Currents are
shown using vectors (with the scale shown), and the magnitude of the
east–west current strength is shown in colour. The simulations are described
in Methods. Mad, Madagascar.
NATURE
|
Vol 463
|
4 February 2010 LETTERS
655
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
©2010
the particular simulation, with a concentration of atmospheric CO
2
of
1,120 p.p.m., used in this study have not been previously described. Here we
have concentrated on one simulation appropriate for mid-Eocene to late-Eocene
conditions, although none of the results we have discussed are sensitive to the
particulars of that choice, as the relevant boundary conditions and main palaeo-
currents remained largely unchanged between the end of the Cretaceous period
and the early-to-mid Miocene, when current systems shifted towards their
modern state
10
.
Full Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of
the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
Received 28 May; accepted 25 November 2009.
Published online 20 January 2010.
1. Yoder, A. D. & Nowak, M. D. Has vicariance or dispersal been the predominant
biogeographic in Madagascar? Only time will tell. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37,
405
–
431 (2006).
2. Simpson, G. G. Mammals and land bridges. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 30, 137
–
163 (1940).
3. Heaney, L. R. Is a new paradigm emerging for oceanic island biogeography?
J. Biogeogr. 34, 753
–
757 (2007).
4. Thiel, M. & Haye, P. A. The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III.
Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 44,
323
–
429 (2006).
5. Tattersall, I. in Elwyn Simons: A Search for Origins (eds Fleagle, J. G. & Gilbert, C. C.)
397
–
408 (Springer, 2008).
6. Tattersall, I. Historical biogeography of the strepsirhine primates of Madagascar.
Folia Primatol. (Basel) 77, 477
–
487 (2006).
7. Masters, J. C., de Wit, M. J. & Asher, R. J. Reconciling the origins of Africa, India
and Madagascar with vertebrate dispersal scenarios. Folia Primatol. (Basel) 77,
399
–
418 (2006).
8. McCall, R. A. Implications of recent geological investigations of the Mozambique
Channel for the mammalian colonization of Madagascar. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264,
663
–
665 (1997).
9. Stankiewicz, J., Thiart, C., Masters, J. C. & de Wit, M. J. Did lemurs have
sweepstake tickets? An exploration of Simpson’s model for the colonization of
Madagascar by mammals. J. Biogeogr. 33, 221
–
235 (2006).
10. von der Heydt, A. & Dijkstra, H. A. Effect of ocean gateways on the global ocean
circulation in the late Oligocene and the early Miocene. Paleoceanography 21,
PA1011 (2006).
11. Goodman, S. M., Ganzhorn, J. U. & Rakotondravony, D. in The Natural History of
Madagascar (eds Goodman, S. M. & Benstead, J. P.) 1159
–
1186 (Chicago Univ.
Press, 2003).
12. Yoder, A. D. et al. Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor.
Nature 421, 734
–
737 (2003).
13. Poux, C. et al. Asynchronous colonization of Madagascar by the four endemic
clades of primates, tenrecs, carnivores, and rodents as inferred from nuclear
genes. Syst. Biol. 54, 719
–
730 (2005).
14. Vences, M. Origin of Madagascar’s extant fauna: a perspective from amphibians,
reptiles and other non-flying vertebrates. Ital. J. Zool. (Modena) 71 (suppl.),
217
–
228 (2004).
15. Nagy, Z. T., Joger, U., Wink, M., Glaw, F. & Vences, M. Multiple colonization of
Madagascar and Socotra by colubrid snakes: evidence from nuclear and
mitochondrial gene phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2613
–
2621 (2003).
16. Krause, D. W. Fossil molar from a Madagascan marsupial. Nature 412, 497
–
498
(2001).
17. Krause, D. W. et al. Late Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrates from Madagascar:
implications for Latin American biogeography. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 93, 178
–
208
(2006).
18. Stuenes, S. Taxonomy, habits, and relationships of the subfossil Madagascan
hippopotami Hippopotamus lemerlei and H.madagascariensis.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.
9, 241
–
268 (1989).
19. Rabinowitz, P. D., Coffin, M. F. & Falvey, D. The separation of Madagascar and
Africa. Science 220, 67
–
69 (1983).
20. Ali, J. R. & Aitchison, J. C. Gondwana to Asia: plate tectonics, paleogeography and
the biological connectivity of the Indian sub-continent from the Middle Jurassic
through latest Eocene (166
–
35 Ma). Earth Sci. Rev. 88, 145
–
166 (2008).
21. Godinot, M. Lemuriform origins as viewed from the fossil record. Folia Primatol.
(Basel) 77, 446
–
464 (2006).
22. Rabinowitz, P. D. & Woods, S. The Africa
–
Madagascar connection and
mammalian migrations. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 44, 270
–
276 (2006).
23. Bassias, Y. Petrological and geochemical investigations of rocks from the Davie
Fracture Zone (Mozambique Channel) and some tectonic implications. J. Afr.
Earth Sci. 15, 321
–
339 (1992).
24. Krause, D. W., Hartman, J. H. & Wells, N. A. in Natural Change and Human Impact in
Madagascar (eds Goodman, S. D. & Patterson, B. D.) 3
–
43 (Smithsonian Inst.
Press, 1997).
25. Kappeler, P. M. Lemur origins: rafting by groups of hibernators? Folia Primatol.
(Basel) 71, 422
–
425 (2000).
26. Schott, F. A., Xie, S. P. & McCreary, J. P. Jr. Indian Ocean circulation and climate
variability. Rev. Geophys. 47, RG1002 (2009).
27. de Ruijter, W. P. M., Ridderinkhof, H. & Schouten, M. Variability of the southwest
Indian Ocean. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 363, 63
–
76 (2005).
28. Yeager, S. G., Shields, C. A., Large, W. G. & Hack, J. J. The low-resolution CCSM3.
J. Clim. 19, 2545
–
2566 (2006).
29. Otto-Bliesner, B. L. et al. Last glacial maximum and Holocene climate in CCSM3.
J. Clim. 19, 2526
–
2544 (2006).
30. Liu, Z. et al. Global cooling during the Eocene-Oligocene climate transition. Science
323, 1187
–
1190 (2009).
Acknowledgements M. Nowak, W. de Ruijter, I. Tattersall and A.Yoder supplied
reprints. J. Aitchison, R. Corlett and A.Switzer are thanked for sharing information.
M.H. is supported by US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant 0927946-ATM
and uses the US National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM, which is
supported by the NSF. M.H. acknowledges conversations with P. Koch and D. Raup
on vicariance biogeography. All computing was performed at the Rosen Center for
Advanced Computing, which is part of Information Technology at Purdue, Purdue
University.
Author Contributions J.R.A. initiated the study and was primarily responsible for
the geologically related aspects. M.H. carried out the palaeo-oceanographic
modelling and its interpretation. Both authors contributed to the writing of the
paper.
Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at
www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.H.
(huberm@purdue.edu).
LETTERS NATURE
|
Vol 463
|
4 February 2010
656
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
©2010
METHODS
Our simulations incorporate the detailed boundary conditions (that is, topo-
graphy, vegetation and bathymetry) developed previously for Eocene condi-
tions
30–32
. The latitudinal position of the gyres and their strengths are very
robust to boundary-condition changes appropriate to the Palaeogene as they
are essentially Sverdrupian responses to wind stress changes as modulated by the
slowly varying palaeogeographies
31–33
.
As described in ref. 9, the rafting problem involves estimating the surface
ocean currents with the potential additional influence of surface winds.
Currents below the surface are not relevant because typical rafts, such as a tree
trunk launched into the ocean from a river mouth during a flood, would not have
‘keels’ that extended below several metres. Similarly, it is unlikely they had
substantial protruding elements that could have formed ‘masts’, and would thus
have been unaffected by wind shear. Here we assume that the raft simply acted
like a drifter embedded in the ocean surface current (the surface model level
extends down to 8 m). Analysis of the modern simulation using this same model
(not shown) produces ocean currents in agreement with observations and the
prior work on Madagascar
9
.
The Eocene simulation focused on in this study was carried out with an atmo-
spheric CO
2
concentration of 1,120 p.p.m. and all other boundary conditions set at
near-modern, pre-industrial values. It is a branch simulation from a simulation with
a higher concentration of atmospheric CO
2
that was integrated for a simulated time
of more than 3,000 yr. After this spin-up time, the 1,120-p.p.m. simulation was
integrated for 3,500 yr. We analysed the monthly mean output from the last 400yr
of simulation to generate Fig. 2a, b. Output at 3-d resolution for the final century of
integration was used to generate Fig. 2c. Although the magnitude of the optimal
eastward flow is somewhat dependent on the averaging period (peak velocity
increases from ,13 cm s
21
when monthly mean values are used to ,23 cm s
21
when
3-d means are used), the qualitative aspects of the flow are not sensitive to averaging
length. In the sampling of both the mean configuration and the extreme events, flow is
always westward from Madagascar towards Africa because this is the direction deter-
mined by the large-scale gyres in the modern era. Preliminary results from a com-
parable Miocene (15 Myr ago) simulation show similar results to the modern-day
one. All file processing and graphics were performed using the US National Center for
Atmospheric Research Command Language (http://ncl.ucar.edu).
31. Huber, M., Sloan, L. C. & Shellito, C. J. in Causes and Consequences of Globally Warm
Climates in the Early Palaeogene (eds Wing, S. L., Gingerich, P. D., Schmitz, B. &
Thomas, E.) 25
–
47 (GSA Special Paper 369, Geological Society of America,
2003).
32. Huber, M. & Nof, D. The ocean circulation in the southern hemisphere and its
climatic impacts in the Eocene. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 231, 9
–
28
(2006).
33. Huber, M. et al. Eocene circulation of the Southern Ocean: was Antarctica kept
warm by subtropical waters? Paleoceanography 19, PA4026 (2004).
doi:10.1038/nature08706
Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
©2010