Article

I Won't Let You Down ... or Will I? Core Self-Evaluations, Other-Orientation, Anticipated Guilt and Gratitude, and Job Performance

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, Suite 2000 SH/DH, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6370, USA.
Journal of Applied Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.31). 01/2010; 95(1):108-21. DOI: 10.1037/a0017974
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Although core self-evaluations have been linked to higher job performance, research has shown variability in the strength of this relationship. We propose that high core self-evaluations are more likely to increase job performance for other-oriented employees, who tend to anticipate feelings of guilt and gratitude. We tested these hypotheses across 3 field studies using different operationalizations of both performance and other-orientation (prosocial motivation, agreeableness, and duty). In Study 1, prosocial motivation strengthened the association between core self-evaluations and the performance of professional university fundraisers. In Study 2, agreeableness strengthened the association between core self-evaluations and supervisor ratings of initiative among public service employees. In Study 3, duty strengthened the association between core self-evaluations and the objective productivity of call center employees, and this moderating relationship was mediated by feelings of anticipated guilt and gratitude. We discuss implications for theory and research on personality and job performance.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Amy Wrzesniewski
    • "Over the past decade, researchers have started addressing the role of emotion in ethical decision making (Bazerman, Gino, Shu, & Tsay, 2011;Gino & Shea, 2012;Teper, Zhong, & Inzlicht, 2015;Zhong, 2011), including the role of general positive affect (Gaudine & Thorne, 2001), of positive and negative mood (Noval & Stahl, 2015), and of more specific emotional states, such as guilt (Ghorbani, Liao, Cayköylü, & Chand, 2013), empathy (Cohen, 2010), embarrassment (Warren & Smith-Crowe, 2008) and envy (Moran & Schweitzer, 2008). The role of affective forecasts remains underexplored with the exception of studies addressing the role of affective forecasting errors in the anticipation of guilt (Ruedy, Moore, Gino, & Schweitzer, 2013) and the role of anticipated guilt in promoting ethical behavior (e.g.,Ghorbani et al., 2013;Grant & Wrzesniewski, 2010;Yam & Reynolds, 2014). Whereas the latter research refers to affective forecasts in terms of the psychological costs of unethical behavior (Lewicki, 1983), in this investigation, I exclusively examine affective forecasting related to the motivation to engage in unethical and selfish acts. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An important body of research in the field of behavioral ethics argues that individuals behave unethically and selfishly because they want to obtain desired outcomes, such as career advancement and monetary rewards. Concurrently, a large body of literature in social psychology has shown that the subjective value of an outcome is determined by its anticipated emotional impact. Such impact has been consistently found to be overestimated both in its intensity and in its duration (i.e. impact bias) due to focalism (i.e. excessive focus on the desired outcome). Across four empirical studies, this investigation demonstrates that reducing focalism and thereby attenuating the impact bias in regards to desired outcomes decreases people’s tendency to engage in both unethical and selfish behavior to obtain those outcomes.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2016 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Source
    • "Lazarus and Lazarus (1994) state that gratitude is an emphatic (other oriented) emotion. In a similar vein, Grant and Wrzesniewski (2010) argue anticipated gratitude with regard to other-oriented emotion. Other-oriented indicates concern for the thoughts of other people. "

    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · International Business Research
  • Source
    • "In the last decade, scholars have called for more attention to understanding work meanings through relational mechanisms (Wrzesniewski et al., 2003). Grant and his colleagues were among those who answered this call, providing theoretical (Grant and Parker, 2009) and empirical support (Grant, 2008; Grant and Wrzesniewski, 2010) for a relational perspective to work design and job performance. Those authors, rather than considering the traditional characteristics of work tasks, have focused on the social characteristics of the job; that is, the interpersonal interactions and relationships in which work is embedded. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes the development and testing of an iterative framework, based on a situated cognition perspective, for uncovering cognitive schemas that people enact in sensemaking processes. The research investigated the cognitive schemas of 167 employees participating in a call center through the elicitation of interpretations and the justifications for those interpretations. Data were analyzed by using a laddering methodology based on means-end analysis in order to disclose declarative (i.e., concepts) and procedural (i.e., relations between concepts) knowledge. A cognitive cause map and its main indexes were derived, following principles from social network analysis. The results demonstrate how specific contents of cognitive schemas that arise during sensemaking (e.g., fulfillment) are related to job performance. In addition, the schema connecting skills development to improving career prospects and to personal growth was significant, revealing the prominent influence exerted by procedural knowledge in enacting sensemaking and motivating greater performance.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · European Management Review
Show more