Negative Effects From Psychological Treatments A Perspective

Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, 648 Beacon Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
American Psychologist (Impact Factor: 6.87). 01/2010; 65(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1037/a0015643
Source: PubMed


The author offers a 40-year perspective on the observation and study of negative effects from psychotherapy or psychological treatments. This perspective is placed in the context of the enormous progress in refining methodologies for psychotherapy research over that period of time, resulting in the clear demonstration of positive effects from psychological treatments for many disorders and problems. The study of negative effects--whether due to techniques, client variables, therapist variables, or some combination of these--has not been accorded the same degree of attention. Indeed, methodologies suitable for ascertaining positive effects often obscure negative effects in the absence of specific strategies for explicating these outcomes. Greater emphasis on more individual idiographic approaches to studying the effects of psychological interventions would seem necessary if psychologists are to avoid harming their patients and if they are to better understand the causes of negative or iatrogenic effects from their treatment efforts. This would be best carried out in the context of a strong collaboration among frontline clinicians and clinical scientists.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Em sete estudos experimentais Bergin observou que os indivíduos que pertenciam ao grupo de controlo melhoravam ligeiramente mantendo os seus valores de mudança em torno da média, ao passo que os do grupo experimental dispersavam-se entre uma melhoria e uma deterioração acentuadas (Anexo A). Este resultado ficou conhecido por Efeito de Deterioração de Bergin, suscitando porém uma espécie de viés endogrupal: " a ênfase na conclusão de que algumas pessoas melhoraram ofuscou a igualmente interessante descoberta de que algumas pioraram (…)[e]há poucas razões para acreditar que este estado de coisas tenha mudado ao longo das décadas " (Barlow, 2010). Certamente atentos a estas e a outras dinâmicas vividas no âmbito da psicologia, Seligman e Csikszentmihalyi (2000) enfatizaram que esta ciência possui um foco demasiado alto sobre as psicopatologias, descurando as caraterísticas positivas das pessoas, por conseguinte salientaram a importância de se estudar (e de motivar) as vivências positivas subjetivas, os aspetos positivos da personalidade (e até as organizações positivas) para ampliar a qualidade de vida das pessoas bem como para prevenir as disfunções psicológicas que por vezes surgem quando as suas vivências intencionais são improdutivas e sem sentido. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Este estudo exploratório faz uso do método fenomenológico de investigação em psicologia, para aferir vivências intencionais que possibilitem uma maior compreensão sobre as formas de aumentar a adesão terapêutica, reduzir o dropout dos utentes e o burnout dos clínicos. Para o efeito usou-se um questionário através do qual foram recolhidas informações de 30 indivíduos, que salientam a importância de os psicólogos darem mais atenção às dimensões técnica e pessoal da consulta de psicologia, bem como a uma abordagem clínica integrada, focada não só nos aspetos negativos da personalidade, como nos positivos. ------------------------------------------------------------ This exploratory study makes use of the phenomenological method in psychology research to gauge intentional experiences that allow a greater understanding of the ways to increase therapeutic adherence, reduce the clients’ dropout and the clinicians’ burnout. For this purpose a questionnaire was used through which was collected information of 30 individuals, which emphasize the importance of psychologists to give more attention to the technique and personal dimensions of a psychological session, as well as to an integrated clinical approach, focused not only on the negative aspects of personality, as well as on the positive.
    Full-text · Technical Report · Jan 2016
  • Source
    • "Moreover, there seem to be only minor significant differences of therapeutic effects in different psychotherapy schools (Castonguay and Beutler, 2006; Barber et al., 2013; Wampold and Imel, 2015). However, other findings indicate that there is still a considerable amount of patients who do not benefit from psychotherapy (Lambert, 2013), or even get worse and that the sustainability of therapy effects is limited in certain patient populations (Barlow, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Language is one of the most important “tools” of psychotherapists. The working mechanisms of verbal therapeutic techniques, however, are still marginally understood. In part, this is due to the lack of a generally acknowledged typology as well as a gold standard for the assessment of verbal techniques, which limits the possibility of conducting studies focusing this topic. The present study reviews measures used in clinical research which assess directly observable dimensions of verbal interventions in a reliable manner. All measures were evaluated with respect to their theoretical foundation, research goals, assessment modes, and various psychometric properties. A systematic search in databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, PsycArticles, PSYNDEX, Web of Science, Embase) followed by an additional “snowballing” search covering the years 1940–2013 yielded n = 179 publications eligible for review. Within these publications, 34 measures were identified showing great heterogeneity regarding the aspects under study. Only two measures reached the highest psychometric standards and can be recommended for clinical use without any reservation. Central problems include deficiencies in the systematization of techniques as well as their partly ambiguous and inconsistent definitions. To promote this field of research, it will be important to achieve a consensus concerning the terminology, conceptions and measures of verbal interventions.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Frontiers in Psychology
  • Source
    • "A therapy style characterized by harsh confrontations may well have an adverse effect and could increase the risk of recidivism (Marshall et al, 2005). The awareness that therapy can cause damage has grown, although this is not a problem unique to forensic therapy (see Barlow, 2010). Nunes and Cortoni (2006) looked at offenders who dropped out and found that those who were excluded from therapy ended up with an increased risk of relapse. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motivation for change in offenders is a multi-layered concept and requires a specialized approach. This article first discusses some motivation concepts (together with their limitations) that are often used in forensic practice. Daniel Pink (2009) picked up on some insights from behavioral research and introduced a modern motivation approach in the business world. He calls his approach “motivation 3.0” and promotes commitment in individuals by stimulating three basic human drives: autonomy, mastery and purpose. This model is also useful for clinicians working with offenders. Various steps are illustrated by means of a case study of a sexual offender. ( accepted for publication by SEXUAL OFFENDER TREATMENT, the official journal of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders, IATSO)
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015
Show more