Reducing mental illness stigma in mental health professionals using a web-based approach

Department of Psychiatry, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Aksaray, Istanbul, Turkey.
The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences (Impact Factor: 0.79). 01/2009; 46(3):226-30.
Source: PubMed


This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of a web-based mental disorder stigma education program for mental health professionals.
The sample consisted of 205 individuals who were either residents or specialists in psychiatry. Participants were contacted through a national web-based e-mail group that consisted of professionals in psychiatry, who were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group received an informative e-mail which contained a general account of "stigma" before they were asked to respond to an Internet-based questionnaire which was designed to predict their stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental disorders. Control subjects, on the other hand, were asked to respond to the same Internet-based questionnaire without having been given the aforementioned informative e-mail.
The experimental group, compared to the control group, demonstrated a lesser stigmatizing attitude towards individuals with mental illness, as measured by the Internet-based survey which utilized the "social distance" concepts of stigma.
These data suggest that such "anti-stigma" campaigns using the potential of the Internet might be an effective tool in the fight against the stigmatization of persons with mental illness.

Download full-text


Available from: Mehmet Kemal Arikan
  • Source
    • "As an example of the former is an RCT in China which assessed knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards people with depression, and which showed that didactic teaching and self-directed learning were shown to be superior than didactic teaching alone (Rong et al. 2011). Another mental health staff orientated study conducted an RCT of an internet-based intervention for trainee and trained psychiatrists in Turkey, and found improved attitudes towards people with mental illness for those receiving the web-based intervention (Bayar et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper aims to provide an overview of evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs) worldwide to address: the nature of stigma and discrimination, relevant context-specific factors, global patterns of these phenomena and their measurement and quantitative and qualitative evidence of interventions intended to reduce their occurrence and impact. The background to this study is that the large majority of studies concerned with identifying effective interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination originate in high-income countries (HICs). This paper therefore presents such evidence from, and relevant to, LAMICs. Conceptual overview of the relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature on stigma and discrimination related to mental illness in LAMICs are available in English, Spanish, French and Russian. Few intervention studies were identified related to stigma re-education in LAMICs. None of these addressed behaviour change/discrimination, and there were no long-term follow-up studies. There is therefore insufficient evidence at present to know which overall types of intervention may be effective and feasible and in LAMICs, how best to target key groups such as healthcare staff, and how far they may need to be locally customised to be acceptable for large-scale use in these settings. In particular, forms of social contacts, which have been shown to be the most effective intervention to reduce stigma among adults in HICs, have not yet been assessed sufficiently to know whether these methods are also effective in LAMICs. Generating information about effective interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination in LAMICs is now an important mental health priority worldwide.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
    • "Also, most psychotherapists in training were not averse to work with PWP and showed neutral or moderately positive attitudes towards this group at pretest level. Hence, our data strongly suggest a sampling bias (Bayar, Poyraz, Aksoy-Poyraz, & Arikan, 2009), with psychotherapists being more likely to take part in the experiment if they already had a high personal or professional interest in the topic or already had relatively positive attitudes towards PWP. Psychotherapists in training who are strongly biased against PWP, or against even the subject matter in the control condition, however, might be motivated to not answer the survey due to disinterest or frustration with the topics presented. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Offering counseling and psychotherapy to patients with pedophilia is considered an essential part of sexual abuse prevention by many experts in the field. Yet, professionals’ willingness to offer treatment might be compromised by stigmatizing attitudes towards these patients. In the present study, we developed and tested a 10-min online intervention (including educational material and a video about a person with pedophilia) to reduce stigma and increase motivation to work with this particular patient group. Psychotherapists in training were either assigned to the anti-stigma intervention group (n = 68) or the control group (n = 69) that received information about violence-free parenting. In the anti-stigma condition, agreement with the stereotypes controllability and dangerousness, anger, reduced pity and social distance were significantly reduced after the intervention, compared to the control group, while motivation to work with this group remained unchanged. The effects persisted, though slightly reduced in size, for perceived controllability, anger and social distance at follow-up. Our results suggest that stigmatizing attitudes, negative affective responses and social distance regarding people with pedophilia among psychotherapists in training can be positively influenced by a low-cost intervention. Practical implications of these findings for high quality health care and child sexual abuse prevention are discussed.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2014 · Child Abuse & Neglect
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In clinical practice general practitioners (GPS) and society tend to stigmatise patients with psychiatric problems. To attempt to describe this stigmatisation by GPS and medical students on the basis of information given in the literature. We searched the literature via PubMed using mesh terms: 'family practice', 'physicians', 'family', 'mental disorder', 'attitude' and 'psychiatry' and the word 'stigma'. In addition, literature was supplied by experts and articles were located by the snowball method. Stigmatisation constitutes a major obstacle in the psychiatric and somatic care that gps provide for patients with a psychiatric disorder. Although such patients have a higher somatic vulnerability as a result of their psychiatric problems, they receive fewer technical and exploratory investigations than other categories of patients. Medical students too have a negative attitude towards patients with a psychiatric disorder. More education and training could lead to less stigmatisation but the effect would probably be only temporary. Personal experience is the main factor that leads to greater empathy. The literature suggests that psychiatric patients are victims of self-inflicted stigmatisation and stigmatisation by society and doctors. This leads to social exclusion and poorer healthcare. By tackling the problem of stigmatisation we could greatly improve the quality of life and healthcare for this group of patients.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2011 · Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Show more