Effect of Dystrophin Deficiency on Selected Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscles of the mdx Mouse

Department of Communication Disorders, Marshall University, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25755, USA.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (Impact Factor: 2.07). 12/2009; 53(3):633-47. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0010)
Source: PubMed


Intrinsic laryngeal muscles (ILM) show biological differences from the broader class of skeletal muscles. Yet most research regarding ILM specialization has been completed on a few muscles, most notably the thyroarytenoid and posterior cricoarytenoid. Little information exists regarding the biology of other ILM. Early evidence suggests that the interarytenoid (IA) and cricothyroid (CT) may be more similar to classic skeletal muscle than their associated laryngeal muscles. Knowledge of the IA and CT's similarity or dissimilarity to typical skeletal muscle may hold implications for the treatment of dysphonia.
The purpose of this study was to further define IA and CT biology by examining their response to the biological challenge of dystrophin deficiency.
Control and dystrophin-deficient superior cricoarytenoid (SCA; mouse counterpart of IA) and CT muscles were examined for fiber morphology, sarcolemmal integrity, and immunohistochemical detection of dystrophin.
Despite the absence of dystrophin, experimental muscles did not show disease markers.
The SCA and the CT appear spared in dystrophin-deficient mouse models. These laryngeal muscles possess specializations that separate them from typical skeletal muscle. Considered in light of previous research, the CT and IA may represent transitional form of muscle, evidencing properties of typical and specialized skeletal muscle.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard D Andreatta
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The craniofacial muscles are small skeletal muscles associated with head and neck structures and involved in a wide array of non-locomotor activities such as mastication, swallowing, breathing, vocalization, facial expression, and even vision and other special senses. These muscles are the new kids in the block, starting with their relatively recent appearance with the evolution of the head and neck in vertebrates and to our growing understanding of their distinctive development programs, functions, and pathologies. For convenience, we can group the craniofacial muscles according to their developmental origin: extraocular muscles, branchiomeric muscles (facial, masticatory, pharyngeal, and laryngeal muscles), and tongue muscles (Noden and Francis-West 2006). There is growing recognition of clinical relevance of the craniofacial muscles in terms of diseases that are specific to them (strabismus, laryngeal dystonias, facial paralysis, and many others), but also their characteristic divergent response to certain systemic neuromuscular disorders (sparing by some muscular dystrophies, targeting by myasthenia gravis, to name a few). These are the basic arguments for the uniqueness of the craniofacial muscles that serve as the central theme for the following chapters.
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Musculature of the craniofacial region represents a diverse group of skeletal muscles responsible for processes underlying respiration, deglutition, speech production, vision, hearing, and the display of emotions. Together, these muscles demonstrate a remarkable degree of anatomical specialization that permits their successful engagement in behavioral functions. Because the functional demands placed upon craniofacial muscles differ substantially from those imposed upon other skeletal muscles, the craniofacial muscles show marked anatomical, physiological, and biological deviations from typical limb skeletal muscles. The uniqueness of the craniofacial muscle phenotype has led to their being described by some as “paradoxical” members of the skeletal muscle group (Noden and Francis-West 2006).
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2012