Article

Experimental Investigation of Heat Conduction Mechanisms in Nanofluids. Clue on Clustering

Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation, Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, People's Republic of China.
Nano Letters (Impact Factor: 13.59). 12/2009; 9(12):4128-32. DOI: 10.1021/nl902358m
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Heat conduction mechanisms in nanofluids, fluids seeded with nanoparticles, have been extensively scrutinized in the past decades to explain some experimental observations of their enhanced thermal conductivity beyond the effective medium theory. Although many mechanisms such as Brownian motion, clustering, ballistic transport, and internanoparticle potential are speculated, experimental proof of any of the mechanisms has been difficult. Here, we investigate the mechanisms experimentally by thermal conductivity measurements and structural analysis for the same materials in both liquid and solid states. These studies strongly suggest that clustering holds the key to the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jinwei Gao
  • Source
    • "Additional studies have experimentally determined the bulk thermal conductivity of paraffin PCMs with nanoinclusions [28] [29] [30] [31]. Together, these studies [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] show varying degrees of influence of the nanoinclusions on bulk, room temperature thermal conductivity, and much attention has been placed on determining the physical mechanism(s) that govern these discrepancies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In many studies, carbon nanoparticles with high values of thermal conductivity (10-3000 W/m K) have been embedded into phase change thermal energy storage materials (PCMs) in order to enhance their bulk thermal properties. While a great deal of work to date has focused on determining the effect of these nanoparticles on a PCM's solid phase thermal properties, little is known about their effect on its liquid phase thermal properties. Thus, in this study, the effect of implanting randomly oriented herringbone style graphite nanofibers (HGNF, average diameter = 100 nm, average length = 20 mu m) on the bulk thermal properties of an organic paraffin PCM (IGI 1230A, T-melt = 329.15 K) in both the solid and liquid phase is quantified. The bulk thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity and thermal diffusivity of HGNF/PCM nanocomposites are obtained as a function of temperature and HGNF volume loading level. It is found that the property enhancement varies significantly depending on the material phase. In order to explain the difference between solid and liquid phase thermal properties, heat flow at the nanoparticle-PCM and nanoparticle-nanoparticle interfaces is examined as a function of HGNF loading level and temperature. To do this, the solid and liquid phase thermal boundary resistances (TBRs) between the nanoparticles and the surrounding PCM and/or between contacting nanoparticles are found. Results suggest that the TBR at the HGNF-PCM interface is nearly double the TBR across the HGNF-HGNF interface in both solid and liquid phases. However, both the HGNF-PCM and HGNF-HGNF TBRs are at least an order of magnitude lower when the PCM is in its solid phase versus when the PCM is in its liquid phase. Finally, the effect of nanofiber concentration on the PCM's latent heat of fusion and melt temperature is investigated in order to determine the applicability of the HGNF/PCM nanocomposite in a wide variety of energy systems.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · Applied Energy
  • Source
    • "For spheres, the sphericity is 1; for rods with aspect ratios (r) of 8, the value are nearly 0.6 [42]. Fig. 2 shows the combined illustration of dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity with regard to the indepen dent parameter , u in , which is to a great extent dependent upon colloidal chemistry (e.g., zeta potential) and physical features such as particle size [30] [43] [44]. This figure implies that the thermophys ical properti es can be optimized by using physical method (e.g., rational particle grade packing [44]) or chemist ry method, supposing the aggregation state (u in ) can be controlled . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigates the hydrodynamic and thermal performance of nanofluids in the region of thermal developing laminar mixed convection. Single-phase approach was employed to evaluate the pumping power and heat transfer coefficient, i.e., no novel mechanism other than the renewing thermophysical properties of nanofluids was involved. An aggregation-mechanism-based methodology was introduced and verified to well unify the theological and thermal properties of nanofluids. In comparing the pumping power savings, critical differences between forced convection and mixed convection were found: nanofluids are more favorable for application to mixed convection. Criteria for nanofluid forced-mixed transition have been discussed and presented to help the decision of whether a flow can be viewed as mixed flow.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Source
    • "Further it is mentioned in [29] [30] [31] that the effect of clustering will enhance thermal conductivity up to a certain level due to the percolation effects in the aggregates, as highly conducting particles touch each other through which energy is transferred. However, this enhancement will decrease if the clusters continue to agglomerate to bigger aggregates resulting in sedimentation of clusters [30] [31]. In their study [28], they considered four different set of samples (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper results from an ongoing investigation into modelling the thermal conductivity for alumina–water nanofluids. Seven existing theoretical and empirical models for thermal conductivity of nanofluids have been evaluated for their accuracy by comparing the predicted versus experimental data for a wide range of test conditions. The existing models were found to provide inaccuracies (over/under-predictions) in the range of 2.34–58%. A new model has been developed by employing Prandtl, Reynolds and Brinkman numbers, representing the effects of micro-convection, localized turbulence and the ratio of heat transfer by diffusion to conduction for particle and fluids on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Evaluation of the new developed model by comparing the predicted results against experimental data revealed that the new model is within 5% accuracy for a wide range of data.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2013 · Powder Technology
Show more