No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
... Other literature is focused on the large changes verified in central capitalism-particularly the crisis of the post-war American hegemony and its rebuilding attempts-as triggers of the neoliberal era. On one hand, Literature such as those coming from Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin (2004), Aijaz Ahmad (2004), and Gregory Albo (2004), among others, suggest conceiving neoliberalism as a newly restructured form of imperialism on the basis of great financial and foreign exchange reforms, unilaterally imposed by United States in the 1970s. Ultimately, they refer to a new globalization and financialization of capital that, through different mechanisms, managed to create new and sophisticated mechanisms for a global tax levy. ...
... Other literature is focused on the large changes verified in central capitalism-particularly the crisis of the post-war American hegemony and its rebuilding attempts-as triggers of the neoliberal era. On one hand, Literature such as those coming from Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin (2004), Aijaz Ahmad (2004), and Gregory Albo (2004), among others, suggest conceiving neoliberalism as a newly restructured form of imperialism on the basis of great financial and foreign exchange reforms, unilaterally imposed by United States in the 1970s. Ultimately, they refer to a new globalization and financialization of capital that, through different mechanisms, managed to create new and sophisticated mechanisms for a global tax levy. ...
This volume brings together well-versed authors from four continents to critically discuss the roots of neoliberalism and how academics use the word today. Neoliberalism has recently recycled and mutated towards new forms of radicalization where fear plays a leading role legitimating policies, which would otherwise be overtly neglected by citizens. The authors ignite a new discussion within social sciences, combining the advances of sociology, history, anthropology, communication and the theory of mobilities to understand the different faces and guises of neoliberalism.
Adrian Scribano is Director of the Centre for Sociological Research and Studies (CIES) and Principal Researcher at the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research of Argentina.
Freddy Timmermann Lopez is Senior Lecturer at Catholic University Silva Henriquez, Chile.
Maximiliano E. Korstanje is Senior Lecturer in the Economics Department, University of Palermo, Argentina, and Fellow at CERS University of Leeds, UK, and University of Havana, Cuba.
... Other literature is focused on the large changes verified in central capitalism-particularly the crisis of the post-war American hegemony and its rebuilding attempts-as triggers of the neoliberal era. On one hand, Literature such as those coming from Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin (2004), Aijaz Ahmad (2004), and Gregory Albo (2004), among others, suggest conceiving neoliberalism as a newly restructured form of imperialism on the basis of great financial and foreign exchange reforms, unilaterally imposed by United States in the 1970s. Ultimately, they refer to a new globalization and financialization of capital that, through different mechanisms, managed to create new and sophisticated mechanisms for a global tax levy. ...
In the following pages we aim at providing an alternative definition for neoliberalism that essentially considers it as a new frontier of the historical-geological process of becoming the capital of the world. This phase has the distinctive feature of assuming a new unconventional exploitation era, or, based on Ruy Mauro Marini’s thoughts, a super-exploitation globalization era. In order to construct and substantiate said characterization, we depart from a superficial review of some of the main definitions provided for neoliberalism in recent critical literature so that we can subsequently provide our own concept of neoliberalism, regarding the accumulation model that exacerbates global exploitation on the basis of the restructuring of a Global South marked by the twofold confiscation/predation of primary vital energy-Earth/territories-and social energy-body/work. Lastly, we shall emphasize, at the end of this critical reflection exercise, a current dimension of the neoliberalization process that connects progressive discourse with a new expansive and global rearrangement of extraction of “ideological surplus value” (Ludovico Silva).
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.