A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Surgical Endoscopy
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Surgical Endoscopy
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11733-1
Failing toprepare: theerosion ofintraoperative cholangiography
intherising surgical workforce—a national review ofgeneral
surgery residents’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy andintraoperative
cholangiogram experience
KatharineE.Caldwell1· ElizabethC.Wood2· L.MichaelBrunt1· LucasP.Ne2· CarlWestcott2· MichaelM.Awad1·
ShanL.Kalmeta3· VahagnC.Nikolian3· MaggieE.Bosley3
Received: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 6 April 2025
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025
Abstract
Background With the advent of advanced imaging and endoscopy, we hypothesized that IOC resident training has declined
and is currently insufficient. To this end, we evaluated the national general surgery resident experience with laparoscopic
cholecystectomy both with and without intraoperative cholangiography.
Methods The National Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) operative logs were evaluated
from 2012 to 2023 for general surgery residents. The number of completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CCY) operations
and CCY with cholangiogram were evaluated and compared by postgraduate year, program (academic, community, hybrid,
military), and resident role (first assistant, surgeon junior, and surgeon chief). ANOVA testing was used to analyze the data.
Results The cholecystectomy case volumes of graduating general surgery residents in all cholecystectomies increased
between the 2012–2013 and 2022–2023 academic years (123.9 v 143, p < 0.01). The number of performed CCY + IOC
declined significantly over this period (25.1 v 21.6, p = 0.02). University-affiliated programs demonstrated statistically
lower numbers of IOCs than community-based (19.3 v 34.1, p < 0.01), hybrid (24.0, p < 0.01), or military programs (26.3,
p < 0.01). Community-based programs performed more CCY with IOC than any other group (p < 0.01). Despite the num-
ber of CCY + IOC declining during the study period, an increasing percentage of the CCY + IOC were performed by chief
(PGY5) residents (p < 0.01).
Conclusion Trainee experience with IOC is declining. The decreased rate and number of IOCs performed by residents has
correlated with a “seniorization” of resident experience. This change may result in a future general surgeon workforce with
inadequate IOC experience and ultimately impact patient safety. To bolster experience with both technique and interpreta-
tion, liberal IOC should be advocated for in training environments. A national IOC assessment may be necessary to address
this looming deficit.
Keywords Intraoperative cholangiogram· Laparoscopic cholecystectomy· Trainee· Resident· Autonomy
Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is utilized to delineate
biliary anatomy, aid in prevention of bile duct injury, identify
common bile duct stones, and facilitate intervention for stone
removal [1]. Routine versus selective use of IOC remains
controversial as there is conflicting evidence regarding the
prevention of common bile duct injuries (BDI), although
it may improve early injury recognition [2–7]. Advocates
for selective cholangiography highlight the increase in time
and resources necessary to perform routine IOC despite the
low incidence of unsuspected retained stones and similar
rates of BDI [8]. Regardless of frequency, the ability for
a surgeon to confidently perform and accurately interpret
cholangiograms is advantageous, especially in the setting of
altered foregut anatomy such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
and Other Interventional Te
chniques
* Maggie E. Bosley
bosleym@ohsu.edu
1 Washington University ofSt. Louis School ofMedicine,
St.Louis, MO, USA
2 Wake Forest School ofMedicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
3 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.