ArticlePublisher preview available

Religious/Spiritual Struggles and Well-Being: Examining Latent Profiles of Existential Humility Across Two Studies

American Psychological Association
Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The present study uses a person-centered approach to examine how profiles of commitment, awareness, and openness to existential beliefs moderate the association between religious/spiritual (r/s) struggles and outcomes of well-being across two studies. Measures of existential humility, r/s struggles, and well-being were completed in a sample of undergraduates (Study 1, N = 303) and community members (Study 2, N = 1,027). Latent profile analyses (LPA) were conducted to identify profiles of existential humility (commitment, awareness, openness). The strength of associations between r/s struggles and well-being (i.e., Study 1: depression, anxiety, flourishing, meaning in life, life satisfaction; Study 2: death anxiety, meaning in life) were compared across profiles. Three profiles in Study 1 (i.e., Diffident Seekers, Arrogant Seekers, Moderates) and four profiles in Study 2 (i.e., Humble Seekers, Arrogant Seekers, Arrogant Dwellers, Moderates) significantly differed across outcomes of well-being in the face of r/s struggles. Results suggested that profiles higher in commitment and lower in existential humility (i.e., Arrogant Dwellers, Arrogant Seekers) showed vulnerabilities to depression and lack of meaning, whereas profiles higher in humility (i.e., Diffident Seekers, Humble Seekers) demonstrated vulnerabilities to anxiety. Profiles characterized by moderate commitment and existential humility (i.e., Moderates) showed relative advantages on outcomes of well-being. The findings suggest that the profiles of existential humility moderate the associations between r/s struggles and outcomes of well-being. This study demonstrates the value of taking a person-centered approach to assessing existential humility and its associations with well-being when individuals experience existential pain.
Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
Religious/Spiritual Struggles and Well-Being: Examining Latent Pro󰍏les of
Existential Humility Across Two Studies
Yejin Lee, Aaron T. McLaughlin, Kenneth G. Rice, Daryl R. Van Tongeren, and Don E. Davis
Online First Publication, April 7, 2025. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000559
CITATION
Lee, Y., McLaughlin, A. T., Rice, K. G., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Davis, D. E. (2025). Religious/spiritual
struggles and well-being: Examining latent pro󰍓les of existential humility across two studies. Psychology
of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000559
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to develop a five-item form of the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS; Exline et al., Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 208-222, 2014), (2022). Drawing upon three samples – 711 depressed adults from prior studies that utilized the RSS (Study 1), 303 undergraduates from a public university in the Southeastern U.S. (Study 2), and 121 adults seeking psychotherapy and/or primary care in an integrated behavioral health clinic (Study 3) – findings indicated the five-item version represents a structurally sound and reliable instrument for assessing clinically relevant struggles (divine, interpersonal, moral, doubt, ultimate meaning struggles) in mental health care settings. Specifically, Cronbach’s alphas for the RSS-5 ranged from .77 to .85 across the three studies. Further, scores on this short form overlapped highly with the original RSS in Study 1 and were moderately to strongly associated with validated assessments of positive (well-being, flourishing, and perceived meaning in life) and negative (suicide ideation, depression and anxiety symptoms) mental health in Study 2 and 3. When accounting for depression and anxiety symptoms, RSS-5 scores were also uniquely associated with patients’ suicidal ideation over the past month in Study 3. Although we found evidence of multidimensionality of the selected items that aligned with psychometric findings for the original RSS (Exline et al., Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 208-222, 2014), findings also supported a unidimensional factor structure for the RSS-5 in each sample. Looking ahead, the RSS-5 will hopefully support clinical research and practice in ways that enhance training clinicians’ responsiveness to patients who are experiencing spiritual struggles.
Article
Full-text available
The present study uses a person-centered approach to examine personality profiles of religious variables and the dark triad traits in relation to intellectual humility, prosociality, and mental health cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Undergraduates at a religious university completed assessments across two timepoints (Time 1: N = 1,006; Time 2: N = 126). Latent profile analyses were conducted at Time 1 to examine profiles of religiousness (i.e., religious practices, vertical faith maturity, Christian orthodoxy, spiritual struggles, religious identity) and the dark triad traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy) on distal outcomes (i.e., intellectual humility, altruism, indifference, depression, anxiety, stress) at Time 1, Time 2 (2 years later), and Time 2 controlling for Time 1. Results revealed five profiles (low religious, struggling religious, moderates, prosocial religious, antisocial religious) that differed across outcomes. At Time 1, prosocial religious and antisocial religious scored highest in religiousness, but antisocial religious scored higher in the dark triad traits, indifference, depression, anxiety, and stress and lower in intellectual humility and altruism than prosocial religious. Struggling religious scored higher in depression, anxiety, and stress than other profiles at Time 1. Moderates scored higher on intellectual humility-openness compared to prosocial religious and antisocial religious at Time 2, and still scored higher than antisocial religious after controlling for Time 1. The findings suggest there are distinct profiles of religiousness and dark triad traits that predict outcomes cross-sectionally and longitudinally. This study demonstrates the value of taking a person-centered approach to examine the dark triad traits and religiousness.
Article
Full-text available
Physical and existential threats stemming from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may provoke religious/spiritual (R/S) struggles or exacerbate preexisting angst and questions. In the Global South, where pervasive social–structural disadvantages limit resource availability to mitigate psychosocial consequences, doubts about divine presence and purpose amidst suffering, loss, and uncertainty may be especially salient factors in spiritual and mental health. With two independent samples of Colombians and South Africans recruited during an early phase of lockdown in each country, the current set of studies (N Study 1 = 1,172; N Study 2 = 451) examined positive religious coping (Study 1) and state hope (Study 2) as potential resources that may support the mental health of people living in the Global South who experienced R/S struggles during the public health crisis. Results of hierarchical regression analyses across both studies revealed that R/S struggles were positively associated with depression. In Study 1, there was a two-way interaction between R/S struggles and positive religious coping, such that the relation between R/S struggles and depression was attenuated when positive religious coping was higher for both men and women. In Study 2, a three-way interaction emerged among R/S struggles, state hope, and gender; R/S struggles were associated with higher levels of depression when state hope was low in women and when state hope was high in men. We discuss the implications of these findings for promoting psychological and spiritual well-being in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Spirituality is an important, but oft-overlooked, aspect of the self that may affect college students’ wellbeing and belonging. Few studies have systematically examined closeness to God and spiritual struggles as predictors of college student wellbeing during early college, which is a critical window for identity development. Moreover, research exploring interactions between spiritual struggles and closeness to God in predicting wellbeing outcomes is scarce. We address these gaps in the literature with an analytic sample comprised of 839 first-year college participants who identify as religious. The results of correlational analyses and linear mixed effect models are presented. Closeness to God was associated with greater wellbeing and belonging, and spiritual struggles were associated with lower wellbeing and belonging. In exploratory analyses, a moderating effect of closeness to God on the relation between spiritual struggles and negative outcomes was observed. Implications for higher education and college student development are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Religious/spiritual (r/s) struggles can be emotionally painful, yet little is known about how people cope with them. In our study, undergraduates (N = 976) who were currently experiencing an r/s struggle completed the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS) and standardized, self-report measures of religious coping, secular coping, and religiousness. Zero-order correlations revealed that, in general, RSS subscales related positively to most religious coping techniques (except those focused on pursuing a closer relationship with God) and secular coping techniques. Controlling for religiousness weakened some associations between some r/s struggles and religious coping (e.g., for demonic and moral struggles) and strengthened others (e.g., for divine and interpersonal struggles); however, associations with secular coping were relatively unchanged. These findings suggest that, regardless of religiousness, more intense r/s struggles associate with heightened and diverse efforts to cope, with the caveat that some r/s strugglers may be hesitant to rely on God. Additionally, we observed some nuances in the unique associations between r/s struggles and religious coping across r/s struggle domains. Demonic struggles were the strongest predictor of religious coping. Divine and interpersonal struggles showed mostly positive but weak associations with religious coping. Moral struggles specifically predicted coping focused on purification of perceived sins. Doubt and ultimate meaning struggles showed some negative associations with religious coping techniques. Clinicians may find r/s struggle-coping associations useful. Providers could use the information to educate clients about the ways in which people try to navigate r/s struggles and to guide discussions about coping over the course of treatment.
Article
Intellectual humility (IH) likely is most challenging when individuals are confronted with existential threats, a state we label existential humility (EH). Existential humility includes holding cherished beliefs regarding the meaning of life and death loosely enough to revise in light of evidence, as well as lower defensiveness following existential threats or reminders. We discuss the broader personality structure IH and EH, focusing on the Big Five factor of agreeableness as well as narcissism. We propose that the most diagnostic situations of the existence of intellectual humility – heretofore rare in the empirical literature – are in the realm of existential beliefs. Moving from existential arrogance to humility may require substantial self-change, though transcendent situations such as flow experiences, awe (e.g., wondrous vistas in nature), meditation, or even experience with psychedelics may be viable pathways toward greater existential humility.
Article
We present three studies to examine intellectual humility (IH) contextualized to existential challenges across cultures. With samples (N = 1714) drawn from three regions (United States, Hong Kong, Netherlands), we explore the benefits and drawbacks of various configurations of IH and commitment to beliefs. In two studies, we created a measure of IH contextualized to existential concerns (Study 1; N = 344 adults in the U.S.), replicated its factor structure, and identified distinct profiles of belief commitment and IH (Study 2; N = 340 adults in the U.S.). Then, in our primary study (Study 3; N = 1030 adults from the U.S., Netherlands, and Hong Kong), we examined evidence for the cultural generalizability of the measure and profiles. Implications for future research on the measurement of IH, its manifestation across cultures, and its relevance to the existential domain are discussed.
Article
Previous research has highlighted the benefits of holding one’s views with humility. However, might intellectual humility surrounding existential beliefs also incur some psychological costs? To advance research on intellectual humility about existential concerns (IH-E), we conducted four studies (N = 1,700) to examine potential costs of humility. Study 1 (N = 203) revealed that IH-E was associated with greater death-related anxiety. Study 2 (N = 1,151) replicated this association in a larger sample. In Study 3 (N = 77), a longitudinal study of first-year college students revealed that IH-E predicted negative changes in religious well-being three and six weeks later. In Study 4 (N = 269), a year-long longitudinal study of religious “ex-vangelicals” revealed that IH-E predicted religious disbelief and lower well-being one year later. We discuss implications for the nature and structure of security-providing worldviews. Despite the benefits of humility, holding existential beliefs humbly might come with intrapsychic costs.
Article
We conducted a meta-synthesis to understand how religious/spiritual struggles are linked to Black adolescents’ and emerging adults’ mental health, considering their various socio-demographic identities. To address this research aim, we reviewed and synthesized qualitative data from 19 studies that included the voices of approximately 382 Black adolescents and emerging adults. Data were analyzed using a seven-step meta-ethnography analysis approach. Findings revealed three themes highlighting contributors to Black youths’ negative mental health in relation to their religious/spiritual struggles: (a) Rejected and Unloved, (b) Abandoned and Dismissed, and (c) Doubt, Disengaged, and Reconciliation. Moreover, difficult religious/spiritual experiences were nested within contextual issues associated with typical developmental milestones (i.e., increased sexual activity and religious/spiritual identity development) and participants’ race, gender, sexual orientation, and mental health status (and related trauma). This meta-synthesis provides a foundation for understanding and responding to Black youths’ religious/spiritual struggles when providing culturally responsive and social justice-oriented mental health support.
Article
We advanced an integrative trend examining religiousness/spirituality (R/S) and flourishing using person-centered data analyses. Specifically, we tested a relational spirituality model (RSM) proposition that a latent profile comprised balanced dwelling (e.g. R/S commitment) and seeking (e.g. R/S exploration) would emerge and display greater flourishing, relative to the other subgroups, and we did so using a diverse sample of emerging religious leaders attending 17 graduate theological schools across North America (N = 580; Mage = 31.56; SD = 11.13; range = 19–71; 47.8% female; 62.7% White). A 5-profile model best fit the data, which included an Integrated profile that depicted a balanced relational spirituality that displayed flourishing. Findings suggested that an RSM theoretical framing of R/S indicators provided a distinct relational characterization and contextual lens to offer guidance on promoting flourishing, and specifically, by intervening into the dwelling–seeking dialectic, and self- and relational regulation.