ArticlePDF Available

Teopolitik ve Eskatolojik İnançların Modern Siyaset ve Uluslararası Güvenlik Üzerindeki Rolü

Authors:

Abstract

Bu makale, teopolitik kavramını merkezine alarak, dinî inançların ve eskatolojik beklentilerin modern siyaset ve uluslararası güvenlik üzerindeki etkilerini derinlemesine incelemektedir. Nitekim, teopolitik, dinî ideolojilerin toplumsal ve siyasi yapılar üzerindeki etkilerini anlamak için geliştirilmiş bir disiplindir, çünkü kavramsal olarak din ve siyasetin kesişim noktasında yer almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, makale, Armagedon savaşı gibi kıyamet senaryolarının dinî ve siyasi liderler tarafından nasıl araçsallaştırıldığını ve bu kavramın küresel güvenlik üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmektedir. Özellikle, Hristiyanlık, İslam ve Yahudilik gibi büyük dinlerin eskatolojik beklentileri, toplumsal ve siyasal yapıları şekillendiren önemli faktörlerdir ve çoğu kez uluslararası güvenlik ortamının ve gelişmelerin anlaşılmasında kıymetli ipuçları vermektedir. Zira, zamanın her döneminde yaygın biçimde sahip olunan eskatolojik inanışlar ve bu hususta bilinçaltı müktesebatlarına nüfuz eden kabul gören anlayışlar, ulusal güvenlik politikalarını ve uluslararası ilişkileri etkileyen bir dinamik olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu kapsamda, makale, zaman şümul bir perspektifle teopolitik kavramının dinî eskatolojik beklentilerle nasıl şekillendiğini ve bu beklentilerin iç ve dış politikalar ile uluslararası güvenlik üzerindeki etkilerini açıklamayı hedeflemektedir. Çünkü dinî inançların ve eskatolojik beklentilerin siyasi stratejilerde nasıl kullanıldığını anlamak, günümüz küresel güvenlik ortamını anlamada kritik bir unsurdur. Bundan dolayı, çalışmada bilhassa Hristiyanlık, İslam ve Yahudilik gibi büyük dinlerin eskatolojik inançlarının politik süreçlerde nasıl bir rol oynadığı ve bu dinamiklerin küresel güvenlik üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilerek, politik hadiselerin anlaşılması ve yorumlanmasında teopolitik incelemelerin önemi vurgulanmaktadır.
157
Habitus |  6 | Mart 2025 | 157-186
Doi: 10.62156/habitus.1572221
 Makalesi/Review Article
ve
Üzerindeki Rolü

*
ÖZ

       , dinî ideolojilerin

             
            
          
 

     
            



günümüz küresel güven
 
dinamiklerin küresel güvenlik üzerindeki etkileri ana     

Anahtar Kelimeler:   Melhame-i Kübra, Din ve Siyaset, Milliyetçilik, Mehdi, Mesih,
Radikalizm, Diplomasi.
23 Ekim 2024 / 01 Ocak 2025
 engöz           
Üzerindeki Rolü, HABİTUS Toplumbilim Dergisi, (6), 157-186.
The Role of Theopolitics and Eschatological Beliefs on Modern Politics and International Security
ABSTRACT
This article deeply examines the effects of religious beliefs and eschatological expectations on modern politics
and international security, with the concept of theopolitics at its core. Indeed, theopolitics is a discipline developed
to understand the impact of religious ideologies on social and political structures, as it conceptually lies at the
intersection of religion and politics. In this context, the article evaluates how eschatological scenarios, such as the
Battle of Armageddon, are instrumentalized by religious and political leaders and their impact on global security.
Particularly, the eschatological expectations of major religions such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are
significant factors shaping social and political structures, often providing valuable insights into the understanding
of the international security environment and developments. Indeed, eschatological beliefs, widely held throughout
history, and the accepted understandings that have infiltrated the subconscious, have emerged as a dynamic
influencing national security policies and international relations. In this context, the article aims to explain how
the concept of theopolitics, shaped by religious eschatological expectations, influences both domestic and foreign
policies as well as international security from a time-inclusive perspective. Understanding how religious beliefs
*
, E-posta: muratsengoz74@gmail.com, 0000-0001-6597-0161

158
and eschatological expectations are used in political strategies is a critical element in understanding the current
global security environment. Therefore, the study particularly emphasizes how the eschatological beliefs of major
religions such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism play a role in political processes, and through analyzing the
effects of these dynamics on global security, underscores the importance of theopolitical analysis in understanding
and interpreting political events.
Keywords: Armageddon, Apocalypse, The Great Battle (Al-Malhama al-Kubra), Religion and Politics,
Nationalism, Mahdi, Messiah, Radicalism, Diplomacy.
Citation: engöz, M. (2025). The Role of Theopolitics and Eschatological Beliefs On Modern Politics and
HABITUS Journal of Sociology, 6(6), 157-186.
Received / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / 01 January 2025

          
güvenlik dinamikleri üzerinde giderek daha fazla etkili hale gelmektedir. Bu kapsamda
t         ideolojilerin politik
süreçler üzerindeki etkilerini anlamaya yönelik bir çerçeve sunar (Cavanaugh 2011: 32). Çünkü

 
          

            
         

Teopolitik (Cavanaugh 2011     ve Lang
2001: 50) beklentilerin politik süreçler üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyen bir disiplindir. Din ve
           

          
.
Zikredilen veçheleriyle teopolitik     
          

           
         
       ik, bu
        
        

Üzerindeki Rolü
159
         beklentilerle
 (Evangelical Christianity)

          
         

güçlü bir vurgu yapan b        
            
   Djupe ve Calfano 2019; Veldman vd. 2021). ABD'de Evanjelik
        
müdahaleler ve dini-
          
etkileyebilme gücüne sahiptir.

          

         

Nitekim günümüzde din,        


kendini 
        
         
v          leri,



          
    udilikteki Mesih beklentisini siyasi bir hareket olarak
  
        

160
 (Smith 1991; Esposito 2003; Shimoni 2004). Bu
        

Teopolitik, küresel güvenlik pmektedir
 

grup, (apokaliptik) 
    Apokaliptik     
tarihinin sonunu ya da büyük bir felaketi anlatan dini, kültürel veya mitoloji 
           
        
          

(Lévi-Strauss 1972). Nitekim bu tür inançlar, temsil ettikleri makamlar muhtelif olmak üzere
dini grup ve çevreler  ni
,   

edilmek suretiyle, istismar edilebilmektedirler (Baudrillard 2001; Palmer 2005).

         
(Juergensmeyer 2000; Huntington 1996; Rapoport 2001). Bu noktada 
         Çünkü dini

        
Bu çerçevede teopolitik analizler, din
   
 sunarak hem mevcut hem de gelecekteki küresel güvenlik stratejilerinin daha etkili bir
    ur     
rolünün daha iyi kavranabilmesi 



Üzerindeki Rolü
161

Bu  
         

          


         

    ideolojilerin ve eskatolojik beklentilerin politik
         
        
 (Melhâme-i Kübrâ) ve       
         
          
ideolojileri
       
 hedeflemektedir.

          
etkilerini analiz ederken, eskatoloji (McDannell ve e son
merkezi bir rol oynar. Dinî eskatoloji (Daley 2009: 24), genellikle dünya
             

   Bu kapsamda Armagedon (Aune 2003: 872) ve benzeri

bulur.
        
           

            

162
          

Hristiyan fundamentalist gruplar ve Evanjelik hareketler (Balmer 2006: 123) için büyük bir
öneme sahiptir.
   a       
           stiyanlar
 

          
          


Evanjelik          

         

         
nmesi,
             
         


     

için           
        
 



         
  Armagedon      

Üzerindeki Rolü
163
           
 (Milhemet Gog
u-        


temelde Armagedon beklentisi (Frykholm 2004a: 80), özellikle Yahudi- 

             
 tli
etkisini göstermektedir. Bu kapsamda Armagedon beklentisi ise, dini bir inanç olmaktan öte,


Yahudilikteki 

        jisinde,



         
         
            

          
          hikâye
içerir, bu 



         
        
           
adaletle yönetilecektir.

164
        
            

  




         
yorumlanabilir.

            
           


            in
ve Peled 2002).
         
i'ne
kadar uzanan ve  (Arz-
        
esaret dönemlerinden biri olarak


        

          
          
n           

ni bir zaferi de ifade

(Katz 2019).

Üzerindeki Rolü
165


 (dini literatürde -i Kübra ya da Arapça
orijinaliyle al-Malhama al--Malhama al-Kubra ifadesi,
Arapçada  veya büyük katliam   Malhama kelimesi, köken

         
otik bir dönemi ifade eder.
        

    : 132). Bu noktada Kur'an ve Hadislerde,

           
yeryüzüne dönmesi gibi olayla

 
            
         




          


oynam

        
       
         


166
 


          
          
          
         


            
   
             

        


           
            
          

          

         


          
toplum






Üzerindeki Rolü
167

Milliyetçilik            
        
          
          
     olgu      
dünyas
           
          
         
         


 hem dini hem de milliyetçi bir zafer

Dini eskatoloji ile milliyetçi        

           
         



Nitekim milliye          

         
h          

-1291), din ve milliyet
            
        


168

dini milliyetçilik 
Bu süreçte, Hristiy         


           

       da dini kimliklerin
milliyetçi politikalarla bir     
         
        milliyetçi
 


 hem dini hem de siyasi


        
         
 

        
politika tercihlerine etki etmektedir. 
iyi ile kötü
ylem daha
         

 
faktörlerdendir.
          
           
 


Üzerindeki Rolü
169
          
müdahalelerini dini        

          
         

          





Yahudi 


          
h
         

         


         gibi son
         
         de

            
          
           



170
         

           
          
inançlar 


       
söylemlerle b
         
          
          
 

Yukar

  




          
-
dikkat çekmektedir. Bu ideoloji temelde, dini bir birlik tesis etmeyi amaçlasa da 

      hareketler, dini eskatolojiyi milliyetçi
 
          
         

          


Üzerindeki Rolü
171
          
           
          


eskatolojinin milliyetçi ideolojiler üzerindeki etkisini gösteren güçlü bir örnektir.
da 
         
          

           
          
         
olarak sunabilir (Juergensmeyer 2000: 130).
         








döne          
         
         



        
       

172

         


       
(Gerges 2014).
        
           
sermektedir. Bu kapsamda Suriye 
          
            
           
      da   

        
Ba'ath Party
           
sosyalizmi savunan bir ideolojiye sahipti ve Saddam Hüseyin, 1979'dan 2003'teki devrilene

ve Saddam 


Bu örn         

llendirilmesi


Teopolitik 
anlamada kritik bir araç        
           
           

Üzerindeki Rolü
173

-115).
 
           

       

-212). 


         
-307).




           
-137). 
          
      

            

etmeyenler
             


-



 

174

            
stratejileri-217).
          

         

           
ama
         
           
           

         



Dini eskatoloji günümüzde,  de
ve 
 
mesel     nispeten her seferinde daha fazla
           
türülmektedir. ölgesinde
halen dahi cereyan etmekte bulunan, görünürde etnik ve mezhepsel motifli ancak hakikatte

            


          


         

Üzerindeki Rolü
175
 
         


          
hedefle           
          

Dini liderler ve radikal grupl       

           
(Juergensmeyer        
          
   ve bu

       
 kilerin daha iyi


        koyarak
  

 
(Braniff ve Ryan 2018: 7).

          


    vanjelik için dini bir zorunluluk olarak kabul edilir


176
          
(Juergensmeyer 2000: 125).
        
          
aline gelir. Teopolitik


         

         
(Braniff ve Ryan 201


Bu tür         

         yet
            
         
         yönetilmesi


           
taraf       

e serer (Braniff ve


 
         

hissedebilirler (Barkun 2013:        


Üzerindeki Rolü
177

en ciddi senaryol
         
            urum,
       ve     

 




          


 
önemli bir yer tutar.        

           
             
        
          


       bir retorik üzerinden yürütülmesi,
           
        
 

       
         

          

178



         



üzerindeki etkileri, günümüz       
        

gelmesi, kür
         
l birer motivasyon
            
       

Hristiyan eskatoloj        
           
          

     de     
        

           
         
           



     



Üzerindeki Rolü
179

            


 



         

         
        
   nedenle, teopolitik analizlerin elbette     
 ile
       ,  
daha gerçekçi,
 ve tatbik edilebilir   benimsenmesine imkân verebilir. Bu
 günümüzde k      
, askeri ve siya        
 analizlere dahil edilmesinin      
    ifade edilebilir. Bundan mütevellit burada 
tekraren ifade edilebilir ki, ugüvenlik ve diplomasi süreçlerinde, elbette 
faktörlerle birlikte, , ''üyu vukuundan mühimdir'' düsturuyla,
   kimi      retoriklerin de
 için gerekli dikkat ve gayretlerin eksiksiz bir biçimde teksifi kritik bir
hususiyete sahiptir.
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
In recent years, the role of religious beliefs and eschatological expectations in global politics
has garnered significant attention. These dynamics are increasingly recognized as crucial
factors shaping both international relations and state policies. The term theopolitics serves as a
framework for exploring the complex relationship between religion and politics, analyzing how
religious ideologies and eschatological beliefs influence political processes and decision-

180
making. This interdisciplinary approach sheds light on the political mobilization of religion and
its impact on both domestic and international political structures. Theopolitics, therefore, offers
a critical perspective for understanding how religious beliefs are transformed into political
strategies or, at the very least, how they influence these strategies.
The field of theopolitics investigates not only the individual effects of religion but also
its broad impact on societal and political structures. Religion, which is often viewed as a
personal or communal practice, plays a much larger role in shaping state ideologies and
international policies, especially in a global environment increasingly marked by religious and
cultural pluralism. The intersection of religion and politics becomes even more critical in
contemporary geopolitical contexts, where religious narratives and eschatological expectations,
such as apocalyptic visions or messianic beliefs, drive or influence state actions.
For instance, the presence of theopolitical tendencies can be observed in regions like the
Middle East, where religious identities and eschatological beliefs have a profound influence on
political discourse. Many ongoing conflicts in the region are fueled by religious differences and
messianic expectations, particularly within Islamic and Jewish contexts. Similarly, in Western
countries such as the United States, ev
evident, especially during presidential election campaigns. The discourse surrounding national
identity and external threats is often cloaked in religious symbolism, which in turn shapes
foreign policy decisions and international relations. This theopolitical tendency, often reflecting
ultra-nationalist ideologies, places patriotism second to a religiously-infused nationalism,
highlighting how deeply religion can permeate politics.
One of the most prominent examples of theopolitics is the influence of eschatological
beliefs on international security policies. Eschatology, which pertains to beliefs about the end
of the world or final judgment, plays a significant role in shaping both domestic and foreign
policy strategies. Many state actors and radical groups utilize eschatological narratives to justify
political or military actions. For instance, the belief in an imminent apocalyptic war influences
national security strategies in countries like Iran, where the Shia eschatological concept of the

fuels political rhetoric but also promotes military build-up and preparations for perceived
inevitable conflicts. Simi
particularly within Zionist movements that link the establishment of the state to messianic
prophecies, is another clear example of how religion and politics intersect on a global scale.

Üzerindeki Rolü
181
Moreover, theopolitics extends beyond the traditional state actors and influences non-
state actors, including radical religious groups. These groups often use eschatological
expectations as a basis for their political ideologies and as justification for violent actions. For
example, groups such as ISIS have drawn on apocalyptic beliefs to legitimize their acts of terror
and violence, framing them as part of a broader religious war aimed at ushering in the end times.
This apocalyptic narrative provides both a justification and a motivation for their actions,
attracting followers who are drawn to the idea of playing a role in a divinely ordained
eschatological scenario.
The manipulation of religious beliefs by political elites and radical groups also
highlights the security risks associated with theopolitics. The integration of eschatological
rhetoric into political discourse can exacerbate tensions and foster conflict, particularly when
religiously motivated actors view political or military confrontation as necessary steps toward
fulfilling religious prophecies. This intersection of religion and politics creates significant risks
for international security, as it can drive both state and non-state actors to pursue aggressive
policies, sometimes even disregarding diplomatic or peaceful solutions in favor of actions that
align with their eschatological worldviews.
In this context, the concept of theopolitics becomes an essential tool for understanding
the complex dynamics at play in modern international relations. By examining how religious
beliefs, particularly eschatological expectations, are intertwined with political strategies,
theopolitics provides a framework for analyzing the underlying motivations behind state actions
and international conflicts. This is particularly relevant in regions where religion plays a central
role in shaping both domestic and foreign policy decisions, such as the Middle East and parts
of the United States.
The role of religion in politics is further complicated by the rise of religious nationalism.
Religious symbols and ideologies are increasingly being integrated into national projects to
bolster political power and legitimize state actions. This fusion of religious and national
identities can be seen in movements such as Zionism, where Jewish messianic expectations
were instrumental in the establishment of the state of Israel. Similar trends are observed in
various Islamic movements that merge religious eschatology with nationalist agendas, using
religious ideologies to drive political change and influence state policies. The political
mobilization of religious eschatology, particularly when combined with nationalism, has far-
reaching implications for both domestic politics and international relations.

182
One of the most concerning aspects of theopolitics is its potential to destabilize
international security. Apocalyptic expectations and religiously motivated political ideologies,
when combined with military capabilities, pose significant risks to global stability. For
example, the potential use of nuclear weapons in a conflict motivated by eschatological beliefs
could have catastrophic consequences. Countries that incorporate religious eschatology into
their security strategies may be more likely to pursue aggressive or confrontational policies,
increasing the likelihood of military conflict and undermining efforts to achieve peaceful
resolutions to disputes.
Theopolitics also plays a critical role in shaping international diplomacy and
cooperation. Religious and eschatological beliefs can either facilitate or hinder international
collaboration, depending on how they are integrated into political discourse. In some cases,
shared religious beliefs or eschatological expectations can strengthen alliances between states
or political groups. In other cases, conflicting religious ideologies can lead to increased tensions
and conflict, as seen in the ongoing rivalry between Iran and Israel, where eschatological
rhetoric is used to justify aggressive foreign policies on both sides.
In conclusion, theopolitics offers a crucial lens for understanding the intersection of
religion and politics in modern international relations. By analyzing how religious beliefs,
particularly eschatological expectations, shape political strategies and influence global security
dynamics, theopolitics provides valuable insights into the underlying motivations behind state
actions and international conflicts. As religious ideologies continue to play a significant role in
shaping both domestic and international politics, the need for theopolitical analysis becomes
increasingly important. Understanding the role of religious beliefs in political decision-making
is essential for developing effective strategies to address the security challenges posed by
religiously motivated actors and for promoting peace in a world where religion and politics are
deeply intertwined.

Üzerindeki Rolü
183
KAYNAKÇA
Arjomand, S. A. (1988). The turban for the crown: The Islamic revolution in Iran, England:
Oxford University Press.
Aune, D. E. (2003). Apocalypticism, prophecy, and magic in early Christianity: Collected
essays, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
Ayoub, M. M. (1978). Redemptive suffering in Islam: A study of the devotional aspects of
Ashura in Twelver Shi'ism, Germany: Mouton Publishers.
Balmer, R. H. (2006). Thy kingdom come: How the religious right distorts the faith and
threatens America, NY: Basic Books.
Barkun, M. (2013). The end of days: Armageddon and the apocalypse in the Middle Ages, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (2001). The spirit of terrorism, NY: Verso.
Boyer, P. S. (1992). When time shall be no more: Prophecy belief in modern American culture,
MA: Belknap Press.
Braniff, M., Ryan, A. (2018). The geopolitics of the Middle East: The role of the eschatological
rhetoric, England: Routledge.
Cary, F. (2009). The Middle East and the Persian Gulf as the gateway to imperial crisis The
Bush Administration in Iraq. In: David Ryan, Patrick Kiely (Hrsg.): America and Iraq
Policy-Making, Intervention, and Regional Politics, London: Routledge.
Cavanaugh, W. T. (2011). Migrations of the holy: God, state, and the political meaning of the
church. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Cohn, N. (1993). The pursuit of the millennium: Revolutionary millenarians and mystical
anarchists of the Middle Ages, England: Oxford University Press.
Cook, D. (2002). Studies in Muslim apocalyptic. Maidstone, England: Darwin Press.
Daley, B. E. (2009). The hope of the early church: A handbook of patristic eschatology, MI:
Baker Academic.
Djupe, P. A., Calfano, B. R. (2019). Communication dynamics in religion and politics.
In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics, NY: Oxford University Press.
Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.682
Esposito, J. L. (2003). The Islamic world: The history and culture of Islam and the Muslims,
England: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, M. J. (1980). Iran: From religious dispute to revolution, Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Frykholm, A. (2004a). Rapture culture: Left behind in evangelical America, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Frykholm, A. (2004b). The gospel of Israel: Christian Zionism and the role of the Jews in the
end times, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerges, F. A. (2014). The Obama doctrine: American grand strategy in the Middle East,
England: Palgrave Macmillan.

184
Gorenberg, G. (2000). The end of days: Fundamentalism and the struggle for the Temple
Mount, England: Oxford University Press.
Gundry, R. H. (1997). Commentary on Revelation, MI: Baker Academic.
Harris, S. (2006). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason, NY: W.W. Norton
& Company.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order, NY: Simon
& Schuster.
Ibrahim, S. E. (1989). Islamic resurgence in Egypt, CT: Praeger.
Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence,
CA: University of California Press.
Juergensmeyer, M. (2017). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence,
CA: University of California Press.
Katz, S. (2019). The Messiah of Brooklyn: A Study of the Rabbi and His Followers, CA:
University of California Press.
Keddie, N. R. (1972). Sayyid Jamal ad-Din “al-Afghani”: A political biography, CA:
University of California Press.
Laqueur, W. (1972). A history of Zionism: From the French Revolution to the establishment of
the State of Israel, NY: Schocken Books.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972). The savage mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacCulloch, D. (2003). The Reformation: A history, England: Penguin Books.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Marsden, G. M. (2006). Fundamentalism and American culture, England: Oxford University
Press.
Marshall, P. (2009). Reformation England 14801642 (2nd ed.), England: Bloomsbury
Academic.
Martin, W. (1999). With God on our side: The rise of the religious right in America, NY:
Broadway Books.
McCants, W. (2015). The ISIS apocalypse: The history, strategy, and doomsday vision of the
Islamic State, NY: St. Martin's Press.
McDannell, C., Lang, B. (2001). Heaven: A history, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Momen, M. (1985). An introduction to Shi'i Islam: The history and doctrines of Twelver
Shi'ism, CT: Yale University Press.
New International Version. (1978). The Holy Bible, MI: Zondervan.
Palmer, D. (2005). Apocalyptic rhetoric in the Middle East. Middle Eastern Studies, 41(5), 629-
644. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200500236052
Rapoport, D. C. (2001). The four waves of rebel terror and September 11, Anthropoetics, 7(2),
1-32.
Reinhard, K. (2004). Apocalypticism in the New Testament and early Christianity, Journal of
Biblical Literature, 123(4), 731-748. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3266514

Üzerindeki Rolü
185
Robertson, P. (2001). Signs of the Times: Understanding Prophetic Events, Grand Rapids:
Zondervan.
Sachedina, A. A. (1981). Islamic messianism: The idea of Mahdi in Twelver Shi'ism, NY: State
University of New York Press.
Scholem, G. (1971). The messianic idea in Judaism: And other essays on Jewish spirituality,
NY: Schocken Books.
Shafir, G., Peled, Y. (2002). Being Israeli: The Dynamics of Multiple Citizenship, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Shimoni, Y. (2004). The Zionist idea: A historical analysis and reader. Chicago: Brandeis
University Press.
Smith, A. D. (1991). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History, England: Polity Press.
Smith, J. Z. (2003). The End Is Near: Jewish Eschatology and the Armageddon, New Haven:
Yale University Press.
Tahora. (1992). The laws of purity and redemption, New York: Jewish Law Press.
Talmud. (1965). The Babylonian Talmud, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.
Timmerman, K. (2009). The Iranian threat: The case for a nuclear-armed Iran. Washington:
Regnery Publishing.
Veldman, R. G., Wald, D. M., Mills, S. B. et al. (2021). Who are American evangelical
Protestants and why do they matter for US climate policy? Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Climate Change, 12(5), 693.
Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Thames, England:
Routledge.
Weber, T. P. (2004). On the road to Armageddon: How evangelicals became Israel's best
friend, Ada, MI: Baker Academic.

186
Makale Bilgileri/Article Information
Etik Beyan:







Ethical Statement:








Çıkar Çatışması:




Conflict of Interest:



Yazar Katkı Beyanı:



Author Contribution
Declaration:


Mali Destek:



Financial Support:



ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
White evangelical Protestants are the most skeptical major religious group in the United States regarding climate change. While their position of political influence in the Republican coalition is widely recognised, the full range of effects of this position on evangelicals' climate opinions is not. To move research on evangelicals from the margins of climate change opinion research, we review and integrate the interdisciplinary literature on US evangelicals, climate change, and politics. In assessing this literature, we identify three areas in need of further research. First, there is a critical need for more research on the climate attitudes of evangelicals of color, who comprise a growing share of the evangelical tradition in the US. Second, highlighting the Christian Right's active engagement in the climate debate, we identify a need for more experimental work examining how cues from religious elites may shape evangelicals' opinions. Finally, we suggest that to better harness insights across disciplines, researchers must become more explicitly aware of how different disciplines conceptualize temporality. Attending to temporal scale suggests that a new approach is needed to test how dominion beliefs, which are widely thought to be an important theological driver of climate skepticism, operate. We also suggest that two factors that appear to play a weak or limited role in driving climate skepticism over the short term (anti‐science attitudes and evangelical religiosity) may in fact play a significant role in driving skepticism over the medium term. This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Perceptions of Climate Change Trans‐Disciplinary Perspectives > Humanities and the Creative Arts
Book
This work provides the history of Christian fundamentalism, which emerged as a movement with that name in 1920. It first looks at the roots of the movement in evangelical revivalism before 1920. Then it considers fundamentalists’ most characteristic outlooks. It describes the distinctive outlooks of Dispensational Premillennialism concerning history and modern times. Then it looks at the role of Holiness teachings, especially Keswick Holiness, in shaping fundamentalism. Fundamentalists, especially of the Presbyterian variety, were also militant defenders of traditional evangelical Protestant orthodoxy. Being a coalition of related movements, fundamentalists displayed a variety of views as to how to engage mainstream culture. These outlooks and tendencies coalesced into a nationally prominent fundamentalist movement during the years of cultural change from 1917 to 1925. The analysis looks at various dimensions of fundamentalism of the 1920s. The penultimate chapter looks at more recent American fundamentalism, especially in the rise of the religious right since the 1970s. The concluding chapter reflects on the continuing legacy of fundamentalism in the twenty-first century, even as the term itself is less widely used.