ArticlePDF Available

CFP: The Body, Anatomy, and Aesthetics Special Issue: Art & the Public Sphere

Authors:
1
CFP: The Body, Anatomy, and Aesthetics
Special Issue: Art & the Public Sphere
Dr. Linda Roland Danil
In a 2022 article, one of a number of related works, and drawing on the work of Didier Deleule and
François Guéry (2014)– the late art theorist Marina Vishmidt critiqued the manner in which an
analysis of ‘bodies’ seemed to be overly focused on the register of vulnerability, or the post-
structuralist, discursive, or psychoanalytic dimensions, thus relegating bodies excessively to the
realm of the abstract, to the exclusion of the concrete. Anatomy, with regards to both its aesthetic
and scientific purposes, also has abstract and concrete dimensions – as innovative recent works
analyzing anatomy within its broader social and historical contexts demonstrate. See, for example,
the recent special issue of The Anatomical Record (Laitman and Smith, 2022), or the work of
Michael Sappol (2004; 2024).
This CFP is specifically interested in the body, inclusive of anatomy, and will seek to not only
situate and read the body and anatomy within specific political economic contexts (which are not
solely confined to capitalism, although this is a proposed focus) – but also, how those contexts
produce the body (see, for example, Blayney et al., 2022) and anatomy themselves, and how this
may be reflected back or interpreted through specific aesthetic works. This therefore additionally
entails looking at the relationship between the abstract and the concrete – and therefore, for
example, how the abstract of aesthetics, amongst other things, may relate back in a dialectical,
mutually interlinked relationship with the concrete of the economy. In addition, this CFP wishes to
concretize the body and anatomy, in both their individual and collective registers, and how the
abstract and the concrete dialectically shape and produce each other in relation to the body and
anatomy. In so doing, the interplay and distinction between the private body and the body that
appears in the public sphere (see, for example, Butler, 2011), how this might be reflected in
aesthetic works, and what this tells us about said public sphere – will also be considered.
This CFP is therefore interested in articles that explore, but are not limited to:
The body in aesthetic works and its relation to the public sphere
Anatomy, aesthetics, and the public sphere
The history of anatomy
Queer, intersex, and trans anatomies
Race, gender, class, and anatomy and the body in relation to the public sphere
The evolution of the representation and understanding of queer, intersex, and trans
bodies
The production and mediation of the body within specific political economic
contexts, including capitalism
Urban design and the production and mediation of the body
2
Deadline for the submission of abstracts: 30 June 2025
Deadline for the submission of manuscripts: 30 November 2025
Email abstracts to: lindarolandd@gmail.com
References
Blayney, S., Hornsby, J., and Whaley, S. (2022) The Body Productive: Rethinking Capitalism,
Work and the Body, London: Bloomsbury.
Butler, J. (2011) Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street, transversal texts, Available at:
https://transversal.at/transversal/1011/butler/en (Accessed 6 March 2025)
Deleule, D. and Guéry, F. (2014) The Productive Body, London: Zero Books.
Sappol, M. (2004) A Traffic of Dead Bodies: Anatomy and Embodied Social Identity in Nineteenth-
Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sappol, M. (2024) Queer Anatomies: Aesthetics and Desire in the Anatomical Image, 1700 – 1900.
London: Bloomsbury.
Laitman, JT and Smith, Heather F. (2022) The Anatomical Record explores the soul of the
anatomical sciences in a groundbreaking special issue: “Evolution of a discipline, the changing face
of anatomy”, The Anatomical Record, 305(4): 762 – 765.
Vishmidt, M. (2022) ‘Corporeal and abstract: Is there a ‘left biopolitics’ of bodies? In: Steffan
Blayney, Joey Hornsby, and Savannah Whaley (eds.) The Body Productive: Rethinking Capitalism,
Work and the Body, London: Bloomsbury: 59 – 80.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.