ArticlePublisher preview available

Climate-induced changes in agricultural land use: parcel-level evidence from California’s Central Valley

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

How growers adjust land-use decisions to a changing climate has important consequences for food supplies and environmental impact. In this paper, we examine changes in agricultural land use as an adaptive response to long-term climate impacts, using unique parcel-level data in Central Valley, California – a major agricultural hub worldwide. We combine parcel-specific acreage decisions and climate normal to assess the climate-induced land use transition. We find that growers in the Central Valley are transitioning from annual crops to perennial crops in response to changing climates. Summer degree days and total precipitation increased the share of perennial crops, and projected declines in winter chill hours are also expected to increase the share of perennial crops in the Central Valley. Analysis of land-use with heterogeneous land quality suggests that the share of perennial crops increased 11% in high-quality lands and 7% in low quality lands.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Received: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published online: 17 March 2025
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2025
Extended author information available on the last page of the article
Climate-induced changes in agricultural land use: parcel-
level evidence from Californias Central Valley
SiddharthKishore1· MehdiNemati2· ArielDinar1· Cory L.Struthers3·
ScottMacKenzie4· Matthew S.Shugart4
Climatic Change (2025) 178:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03905-8
Abstract
How growers adjust land-use decisions to a changing climate has important consequences
for food supplies and environmental impact. In this paper, we examine changes in agricul-
tural land use as an adaptive response to long-term climate impacts, using unique parcel-
level data in Central Valley, California – a major agricultural hub worldwide. We combine
parcel-specic acreage decisions and climate normal to assess the climate-induced land
use transition. We nd that growers in the Central Valley are transitioning from annual
crops to perennial crops in response to changing climates. Summer degree days and total
precipitation increased the share of perennial crops, and projected declines in winter chill
hours are also expected to increase the share of perennial crops in the Central Valley.
Analysis of land-use with heterogeneous land quality suggests that the share of perennial
crops increased 11% in high-quality lands and 7% in low quality lands.
Keywords Climate change adaptation · Land-use modeling · Perennial crops · Annual
crops · California
1 Introduction
Climate change has been the subject of much research in agriculture (Lobell et al. 2007;
Lobell and Field 2011; Lobell et al. 2011; Deschenes and Kolstad 2011; Lee and Sumner
2015). The majority of work is conducted using county-level data to assess the relationship
between acreage decisions and climate (e.g., Cui 2020; Cui and Zhong 2024), with a few
notable exceptions that use individual farm-level data (e.g., Ramsey et al. 2021; Wimmer
et al. 2024; Ji and Cobourn 2021). Despite the extensive literature on climate-agriculture
interactions, there is little empirical evidence on changes in acreage decisions in response
to climate change at the micro level. The most recent estimates of climate-induced crop
switching in dryland agriculture have been at the county-level scale (e.g., Arora et al. 2020;
Mu et al. 2018) and mask signicant parcel-level heterogeneity. Using unique parcel-level
1 3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Efficiently managing agricultural irrigation is vital for food security today and into the future under climate change. Yet, evaluating agriculture’s hydrological impacts and strategies to reduce them remains challenging due to a lack of field-scale data on crop water consumption. Here, we develop a method to fill this gap using remote sensing and machine learning, and leverage it to assess water saving strategies in California’s Central Valley. We find that switching to lower water intensity crops can reduce consumption by up to 93%, but this requires adopting uncommon crop types. Northern counties have substantially lower irrigation efficiencies than southern counties, suggesting another potential source of water savings. Other practices that do not alter land cover can save up to 11% of water consumption. These results reveal diverse approaches for achieving sustainable water use, emphasizing the potential of sub-field scale crop water consumption maps to guide water management in California and beyond.
Article
Full-text available
Assessing the effects of weather and climate on agricultural production is crucial for designing policies related to climate change adaptation and mitigation. A large body of literature has identified the detrimental effects of climate change on crop yields worldwide, and farm‐level adaptation has been shown to mitigate the adverse effects on agricultural production. In this study, we employ a structural model to examine farm production responses to ongoing weather trends. We investigate how farmers adjust output and input decisions by estimating a system of output supply and input demand functions, controlling for nonrandom crop selection. Using panel data with 14,796 observations reflecting 1638 German crop farms (1996–2019), we find that both the expected and realized weather determine farmers' production decisions. In the event of a drought, the supply of most considered crops and the demand for fertilizer decrease. The drought shock has also lasting effects on farmers' production decisions, with a reduced supply of protein crops and an increased level of root crops production in subsequent years. These findings highlight the need to account for farm‐level production responses when assessing weather and climate impacts.
Article
Full-text available
We describe the latest version of the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP-CMIP6). The archive contains downscaled historical and future projections for 1950–2100 based on output from Phase 6 of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The downscaled products were produced using a daily variant of the monthly bias correction/spatial disaggregation (BCSD) method and are at 1/4-degree horizontal resolution. Currently, eight variables from five CMIP6 experiments (historical, SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585) are provided as procurable from thirty-five global climate models.
Article
Full-text available
One premise adopted in most previous studies is that weather fluctuations affect economic outcomes contemporaneously. Yet under certain circumstances, the impact of weather fluctuations in the current year can be carried over into the future. Using agricultural production as an example, we empirically investigate how past weather fluctuations affect economic decision-making by shifting agents’ subjective expectations over future climate. We find that agricultural producers do not form expectations on future climate using only long-run normals, and instead engage in a combination of heuristics, including the availability heuristic and the reinforcement strategy. Adopting these learning mechanisms causes farmers to significantly over-react to more recent fluctuations in weather and water availability when making ex ante acreage and crop allocation decisions.
Article
Full-text available
Relative agricultural productivity shocks emerging from climate change will alter regional cropland use. Land allocations are sensitive to crop profits that in turn depend on yield effects induced by changes in climate and technology. We develop and apply an integrated framework to assess the impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and land use for the U.S. Northern Great Plains. Crop‐specific yield‐weather models reveal crop comparative advantage due to differential yield impacts of weather across the region's major crops, i.e., alfalfa, wheat, soybeans and maize. We define crop profits as a function of the weather‐driven yields, which are then used to model land use allocation decisions. This ultimately allows us to simulate the impact of climate change under the RCP4.5 emissions scenario on land allocated to the region's major crops as well as to grass/pasture. Upon removing the trends effects in yields, climate change is projected to lower yields by 33%‐64% over 2031‐’55 relative to 1981–2005, with soybean being the least and alfalfa the most affected crops. Yield projections applied to the land use model at present‐day input costs and output prices reveals that Dakotas’ grass acreage will increase by up to 23%, displacing croplands. Wheat acreage is expected to increase by up to 54% in select south‐eastern counties of North Dakota and South Dakota, where maize/soy acreage had increased by up to 58% during 1995–2016. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
The intersection of agriculture and climate has been well researched for at least the last couple of decades. Largely, the motivation for previous research has been the potential impact on food security for the world's (growing) population. Many studies have predicted unfavorable yield scenarios for some geographic regions. As a result, another common research theme is farmer adaptation to a changing climate. Typically, these studies are concerned with what farmers could or should do to adapt to adverse outcomes. However, research examining whether farmers respond to weather patterns has largely been ignored. Answering this question can help provide more accurate food security analyses: if farmers do respond to changing patterns through cropping decisions, for instance, the global food supply outcome will be different than a world in which they do not respond. This article aims to provide insights into what and how farmers' cropping decisions respond to weather patterns. The study region is a set of eleven Kansas counties. The article provides an important step toward more credible estimates of global food supplies under changing climates and the methods themselves translate to other areas. Results suggest that land‐use responses to changing weather patterns will vary across time and space.
Article
This paper examines adaptation responses to climate change through adjustment of agricultural land use. The climate drivers we examine are changes in long-term climate normals (e.g., 10-year moving averages) and changes in inter-annual climate variability. Using US county level data over 1982 to 2012 from Census of Agriculture, we find that impacts of long-term climate normals are as important as that of inter-annual climate variability. Projecting into the future, we find projected climate change will lead to an expansion in crop land share across the northern and interior western United States with decreases in the south. We also find that grazing land share increases in southern regions and Inland Pacific Northwest and declines in the northern areas. However, the extent to which the adaptation potential would be is dependent on the climate model, emission scenario and time horizon under consideration.