ArticlePDF Available

Reimagining Insurance: A Strategic Shift from Mainframe Systems to Cloud-Based Operations

Authors:

Abstract

The migration of an insurance company's mainframe and business applications to the cloud represents a significant transformation that modernizes operations, enhances scalability, and reduces costs. Given the insurance industry's reliance on legacy systems, this transition requires meticulous planning, stakeholder alignment, and the adoption of cloud-native technologies. This paper explores the complexities and challenges of such a large-scale migration, where organizations may manage over 120 applications, millions of policies, and more than 75 million lines of legacy code interconnected through thousands of interfaces. The execution strategies discussed focus on balancing business continuity, security, compliance, and performance optimization while leveraging automation and AI-driven insights. The benefits of cloud migration include improved agility, operational efficiency, and data-driven innovation, ultimately positioning insurers for long-term success in a competitive and evolving digital landscape.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
Reimagining Insurance: A Strategic Shift from
Mainframe Systems to Cloud-Based Operations
Santhosh Varatharajan1, Archana Subramanian2
1Sr Specialist, Microsoft Corporation, Apex North Carolina, USA
Email: santhosh.email4u[at]gmail.com
2MetLife Corporation, Apex, North Carolina
Email: archanas.santhosh[at]gmail.com
Abstract: The migration of an insurance company’s mainframe and business applications to the cloud represents a significant
transformation that modernizes operations, enhances scalability, and reduces costs. Given the insurance industry's reliance on legacy
systems, this transition requires meticulous planning, stakeholder alignment, and the adoption of cloud-native technologies. This paper
explores the complexities and challenges of such a large-scale migration, where organizations may manage over 120 applications, millions
of policies, and more than 75 million lines of legacy code interconnected through thousands of interfaces. The execution strategies
discussed focus on balancing business continuity, security, compliance, and performance optimization while leveraging automat ion and
AI-driven insights. The benefits of cloud migration include improved agility, operational efficiency, and data-driven innovation, ultimately
positioning insurers for long-term success in a competitive and evolving digital landscape.
Keywords: Insurance Industry, Cound-native Technologies, Legacy Code, Cloud, Security, Data-driven Innovation, Compliance
1. Introduction
The insurance industry is among the largest contributors to
global GDP, yet many organizations still operate on legacy
mainframe systems developed decades ago [1]. These
outdated systems, while once reliable, now pose significant
operational inefficiencies, high costs, and slow time-to-market
for new products. As digital transformation accelerates, many
insurers are embarking on the challenging yet rewarding
journey of migrating their mainframes and business
applications to the cloud [2].
This paper explores the complexities, challenges, execution
strategies, benefits, and impact of such a migration. The scale
of such a transformation is vast, with some organizations
dealing with over 120 applications, core administrative
systems handling millions of policies, and more than 75
million lines of legacy code. These systems are interconnected
by thousands of interfaces, making the migration process one
of the most complex undertakings in enterprise IT.
2. Complexities of Mainframe Migration
Migrating from a mainframe to a cloud environment is a multi-
dimensional challenge that involves both technical and
organizational complexities [3]. A large insurance company
may have core systems that serve as the heart and mind of its
operations, often built on decades-old technology.
Surrounding these core systems are hundreds of ancillary
applications that support critical functions such as claims
processing, underwriting, customer service, and financial
reporting [4].
One of the biggest hurdles is dealing with the massive amounts
of data housed in legacy systems [5]. Over the years, these
systems have accumulated data stored in outdated formats,
requiring extensive transformation and validation.
Additionally, security and compliance considerations must be
thoroughly addressed, as mainframe security is implicit,
whereas cloud security requires explicit measures such as
encryption, tokenization, and multi-layered access controls
[6].
Another major complexity is the loss of institutional
knowledge. Many legacy systems have been in place for
decades, with undocumented processes and missing source
code. Reverse engineering these systems while ensuring their
continued functionality is a formidable challenge.
Furthermore, integration with surrounding systems must be
carefully managed to avoid disruptions, as a single failed
connection point can create cascading failures across multiple
business functions [7].
3. Challenges in Execution
Several challenges must be addressed for a successful
migration. One of the foremost challenges is aligning
stakeholders across the organization. Executive leadership,
IT teams, business units, and external vendors must be in
sync throughout the migration process to avoid misalignment
and ensure smooth execution.
Maintaining business continuity is another critical challenge
[8]. Insurance companies cannot afford to pause operations
while transitioning to the cloud. They must continue
processing policies, handling claims, and serving customers
without disruption. This requires careful planning, rigorous
testing, and contingency measures to handle unexpected
failures [9].
Performance parity and optimization are also crucial. The
cloud infrastructure must match or exceed the performance
of the mainframe while optimizing costs [10]. Achieving this
balance requires deep expertise in cloud-native architectures,
database optimization, and workload orchestration.
Paper ID: SR25313004418
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25313004418
696
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
Regulatory compliance presents another significant hurdle.
The insurance industry is heavily regulated, with stringent
requirements for data security, privacy, and operational
resilience. Ensuring that all cloud-based applications comply
with these regulations is an ongoing responsibility that
requires constant monitoring and auditing [11].
Finally, managing unknown unknowns is an inherent part of
such a large-scale migration. Unexpected technical
challenges, unforeseen business constraints, and hidden
dependencies often emerge mid-project. A flexible and agile
approach is essential to overcoming these hurdles.
3.1 Step-by-Step Execution Plan
A structured execution approach is crucial for the successful
migration of a mainframe to the cloud [12]. Below is a step-
by-step breakdown of the process:
1) Assessment and Planning
Conduct a comprehensive inventory of all applications,
interfaces, and dependencies.
Define business and technical goals for the migration.
Identify the best migration approach: re-hosting, re-
platforming, or re-architecting.
Engage security and compliance teams to assess
regulatory requirements.
Develop a high-level roadmap with clear milestones and
timelines.
2) Stakeholder Engagement and Governance
Establish governance frameworks to oversee decision-
making and risk management.
Create cross-functional teams involving IT, business
units, security, and compliance.
Maintain continuous communication with leadership and
operational teams.
Document key risks and mitigation strategies.
3) Data and Infrastructure Preparation
Clean, transform, and validate mainframe data for
compatibility with cloud systems.
Design cloud architecture, including network
configurations, storage solutions, and security protocols.
Implement access controls, encryption mechanisms, and
authentication policies.
Establish a disaster recovery and business continuity
plan.
4) Pilot Migration and Testing
Select a subset of applications for a pilot migration to
evaluate performance and functionality.
Conduct thorough performance testing and security
assessments.
Validate integrations with surrounding systems.
Gather feedback from key stakeholders and refine
migration strategies.
5) Full-Scale Migration Execution
Migrate applications, databases, and workloads in a
phased approach to minimize disruption.
Implement automated monitoring and incident response
mechanisms.
Ensure operational teams are trained on the new cloud
environment.
Continuously monitor system performance and optimize
configurations.
6) Post-Migration Validation and Optimization
Conduct thorough system validation and business process
testing.
Optimize cloud-native features such as auto-scaling and
AI-driven analytics.
Ensure compliance with security and regulatory
standards.
Gather user feedback and continuously refine
applications and workflows.
7) Ongoing Innovation and Continuous Improvement
Leverage cloud-based AI and data analytics to drive
business insights.
Expand capabilities with automation, machine learning,
and advanced security measures.
Regularly review system performance and scalability.
Innovate new products and customer experiences
leveraging cloud agility.
4. Execution Strategies
A well-structured and phased approach is essential for a
successful migration. The first step is a thorough assessment
and planning phase. This involves conducting a
comprehensive inventory of applications, interfaces, and
dependencies. Business priorities must be identified, and an
appropriate migration strategy must be selected—whether re-
platforming, re-hosting, or complete re-architecting of
applications [13].
Stakeholder engagement is equally critical. A clear roadmap
with defined milestones must be developed and
communicated across the organization. Governance structures
should be established to ensure cross-functional decision-
making, and transparency should be maintained through
regular progress updates [14].
The technical execution phase requires a hybrid strategy,
involving phased cutovers to minimize risks. Automation
tools play a crucial role in optimizing data transformation and
migration processes. Rigorous testing for performance,
security, and functionality at each stage is necessary to prevent
disruptions [15].
Once migration is complete, business validation and
optimization must follow. Business processes should be
validated to ensure seamless operations post-migration.
Applications should be optimized for cloud-native
capabilities, such as elasticity and AI-driven insights. Cloud
data lakes and analytics should be leveraged to enhance
decision-making and drive innovation [16].
Paper ID: SR25313004418
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25313004418
697
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
5. Benefits of Cloud Migration
Migrating from mainframes to the cloud brings numerous
benefits. One of the most significant advantages is cost
reduction. The high costs associated with mainframe
maintenance, licensing, and operations are eliminated,
making cloud adoption a more financially sustainable
solution [17].
Cloud migration also enhances agility. It allows insurance
companies to accelerate product development and quickly
respond to market changes. Cloud scalability and
performance ensure that business demands are met
efficiently, without the need for excessive infrastructure
investments [18].
Security is another major advantage. Cloud providers offer
advanced security controls, real-time threat detection, and
compliance enforcement mechanisms that far exceed
traditional mainframe security capabilities. Additionally,
cloud-based environments enable data-driven innovation by
integrating AI, machine learning, and real-time analytics for
improved customer insights and business intelligence [19].
5.1 Impact on the Insurance Industry
The shift from legacy mainframes to cloud-native
architectures is revolutionizing the insurance industry. A
modern cloud environment enables enhanced customer
experiences through faster claims processing, personalized
policy offerings, and seamless omnichannel interactions.
Operational efficiency is significantly improved. Automated
workflows, enhanced data accessibility, and streamlined IT
management reduce administrative burdens and free up
resources for more strategic initiatives [20].
Moreover, business growth is accelerated. Companies can
quickly adapt to market changes, regulatory shifts, and
evolving customer expectations. The ability to experiment
with new products and services in an agile cloud environment
fosters innovation and competitiveness.
Looking ahead, cloud migration lays the foundation for
continuous transformation. Emerging technologies such as
generative AI, predictive analytics, and advanced automation
will become more accessible, enabling insurers to redefine
their business models and drive long-term success [21].
6. Conclusion
Migrating mainframe systems to the cloud is an ambitious yet
necessary move for insurance companies striving for
efficiency, cost savings, and competitive advantage. While the
journey is complex, careful planning, stakeholder alignment,
and precise execution ensure a successful transition. By
embracing cloud technology, insurers can unlock agility,
innovation, and resilience, positioning themselves for long-
term success in an ever-evolving digital landscape.
References
[1] D. Ward and R. Zurbruegg, “Does Insurance Promote
Economic Growth? Evidence from OECD Countries,”
The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 67, no. 4, pp.
489–506, Dec. 2000, doi:
https://doi.org/10.2307/253847.
[2] S. Venugopal, S. Desikan, and K. Ganesan, “Effective
Migration of Enterprise Applications in Multicore
Cloud,” in 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference
on Utility and Cloud Computing, Melbourne, VIC,
Australia, Dec. 2011, pp. 463–468. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1109/ucc.2011.76.
[3] D. A. S. George, “Consequences of Enterprise Cloud
Migration on Institutional Information Technology
Knowledge,” Partners Universal Innovative Research
Publication, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 38–55, Apr. 2024, doi:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10938874.
[4] B. Nicoletti, “Processes in Insurance 4.0,” in Palgrave
Studies in Financial Services Technology, B. Nicoletti,
Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020,
pp. 261–307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
58426-9_9.
[5] I. A. T. Hashem, I. Yaqoob, N. B. Anuar, S. Mokhtar,
A. Gani, and S. Ullah Khan, “The Rise of ‘big Data’ on
Cloud computing: Review and Open Research Issues,”
Information Systems, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 98–115, Jan.
2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006.
[6] L. Albshaier, S. Almarri, and A. Albuali, “Federated
Learning for Cloud and Edge Security: A Systematic
Review of Challenges and AI Opportunities,”
Electronics, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1019, Mar. 2025, doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14051019.
[7] S. Flores-Ruiz, R. Perez-Castillo, C. Domann, and S.
Puica, “Mainframe Migration Based on Screen
Scraping,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on
Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME),
Madrid, Spain: IEEE, 2018, pp. 675–684. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2018.00077.
[8] N. Bajgoric and Y. B. Moon, “Enhancing Systems
Integration by Incorporating Business Continuity
Drivers,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol.
109, no. 1, pp. 74–97, Jan. 2009, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910926609.
[9] J. Weinman, Cloudonomics: the Business Value of
Cloud Computing. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2012.
[10] S. S. Manvi and G. K. Shyam, “Resource Management
for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in Cloud
computing: a Survey,” Journal of Network and
Computer Applications, vol. 41, pp. 424–440, May
2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.10.004.
[11] K. R. Gade, “View of Migrations: Cloud Migration
Strategies, Data Migration Challenges, and Legacy
System Modernization,” Journal of Computing and
Information Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2025,
Accessed: Mar. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available:
https://universe-
publisher.com/index.php/jcit/article/view/2/2
[12] I. K. Azeemi, M. Lewis, and T. Tryfonas, “Migrating to
the Cloud: Lessons and Limitations of ‘Traditional’ IS
Success Models,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 16,
Paper ID: SR25313004418
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25313004418
698
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
no. 1, pp. 737–746, Jan. 2013, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.077.
[13] M. Schnappinger and J. Streit, “Efficient Platform
Migration of a Mainframe Legacy System Using
Custom Transpilation,” in 2021 IEEE International
Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution
(ICSME), Luxembourg: IEEE, Sep. 2021, pp. 545–554.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme52107.2021.00055.
[14] A. Mishra, “Legacy System Modernization: Effective
Strategies and Best Practices,” IJLRP - International
Journal of Leading Research Publication, vol. 1, no. 8,
2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14769544.
[15] M. F. Gholami, F. Daneshgar, G. Beydoun, and F.
Rabhi, “Challenges in Migrating Legacy Software
Systems to the Cloud an Empirical Study,”
Information Systems, vol. 67, pp. 100–113, Jul. 2017,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2017.03.008.
[16] V. V. Gurbade, P. Verma, S. Gundewar, and V. S.
Bramhe, “Building a Data Lake for Power BI in the
Cloud: A Review on Utilizing Cloud Storage Services
for Large Datasets,” in 2024 2nd DMIHER
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in
Healthcare, Education and Industry (IDICAIEI),
Wardha, India: IEEE, Nov. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1109/idicaiei61867.2024.10842802.
[17] A. Efremovska and P. Lago, “From Legacy to Cloud:
Risks and Benefits in Software Cloud Migration,” in
Software Architecture for Big Data and the Cloud, I.
Mistrik, R. Bahsoon, N. Ali, M. Heisel, and B. Maxim,
Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2017, pp. 147–165. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805467-3.00009-0.
[18] L. Ngqame, N. Ruxwana, and T. R. Seaba, “The
Current State of Agile Methodology Utilisation in a
South African Insurance Company,” South African
Journal of Information Management, vol. 26, no. 1, p.
1802, Jul. 2024, doi:
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1802.
[19] T. Mather, S. Kumaraswamy, and S. Latif, Cloud
Security and Privacy: An Enterprise Perspective on
Risks and Compliance. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media,
Inc., 2009.
[20] T. Laszewski, K. Arora, E. Farr, and P. Zonooz, Cloud
Native architectures: Design high-availability and
cost-effective Applications for the Cloud. Birmingham:
Packt Publishing Ltd, 2018.
[21] S. Frey and W. Hasselbring, “The CloudMIG
Approach: Model-Based Migration of Software
Systems to Cloud-Optimized Applications . -
OceanRep,” International Journal on Advances in
Software, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 342–353, 2023, doi:
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/14431/1/soft_v4_
n34_2011_8.pdf.
Paper ID: SR25313004418
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25313004418
699
... These limitations create potential exposure to regulatory fines, reputational damage, and financial inefficiencies [2]. To address these issues, insurers may pursue cloud -based modernization that positions EDM as a resilient, scalable, and auditable service-integrated with broader digital transformation agendas [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The ongoing evolution of cloud computing requires sustained attention to security, privacy, and compliance issues. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the current literature regarding the application of federated learning (FL) and artificial intelligence (AI) to improve cloud computing security while preserving privacy, delivering real-time threat detection, and meeting regulatory requirements. The current research follows a systematic literature review (SLR) approach, which examined 30 studies published between 2020 and 2024 and followed the PRISMA 2020 checklist. The analysis shows that FL provides significant privacy risk reduction by 25%, especially in healthcare and similar domains, and it improves threat detection by 40% in critical infrastructure areas. A total of 80% of reviewed implementations showed improved privacy, but challenges like communication overhead and resource limitations persist, with 50% of studies reporting latency issues. To overcome these obstacles, this study also explores some emerging solutions, which include model compression, hybrid federated architectures, and cryptographic enhancements. Additionally, this paper demonstrates the unexploited capability of FL for real-time decision-making in dynamic edge environments and highlights its potential across autonomous systems, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and cybersecurity frameworks. The paper’s proposed insights present a deployment strategy for FL models which enables scalable, secure, and privacy-preserving operations and will enable robust cloud security solutions in the AI era.
Article
Full-text available
Background: South African insurance companies are under pressure to adapt to the constantly changing environment and customer-changing requirements. Agile software development presents itself as a viable solution for swiftly meeting these demands. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the current utilisation of agile methodologies within the South African insurance sector; this article aims to bridge this gap. Objectives: The purpose of this theme is to fully understand the extensive level of the experience for the participants and the nature of projects the participants have been involved in and lastly time frames of the projects and how long have insurance been using agile methodology. Method: For this study, purposive sampling that involves the selection of the units to be observed based on your own judgement about which ones were the most useful or representative will be applied. The criteria were based on the participants having played a role as stakeholder in a project that has used agile methodology within the selected organisation within the past 3 years to remain relevant to this study purpose. Results: The identified pattens from the respondents showed that agile methodology is currently utilised for the following in the selected insurance company: software upgrades new product new function Conclusion: In summary, the current state of agile methodology utilisation in a South African insurance company is associated with application transformation to cloud computing, work transformation, onboarding of new applicants, environment enhancements, schema amendment, introduction of new product such as sales force, automating insurance claims documents, scheme enhancement, fund anniversary and renewal of people’s schemes. Contribution: This comprehensive research significantly contributes to the body of knowledge, shaping the strategic direction of agile methodologies within software development project environments.
Article
Full-text available
As enterprise adoption of cloud computing accelerates, driven by desires to reduce costs and improve agility, IT departments face an unintended consequence-the gradual erosion of internal expertise related to on-premises systems. Surveys indicate 80% of companies have migrated major systems to the cloud, projecting 90% adoption by 2025. While touting benefits like reduced capital expenses and faster provisioning, the reality is many organizations are dependent on external cloud vendors for mission-critical services they no longer fully understand. This knowledge drain regarding legacy infrastructure and applications has left IT teams without the specialized skills to optimize performance, strengthen security, or even adequately evaluate vendor offerings. Analysis shows 70% of IT staff lack deep expertise with cloud platforms and modern devOps tools after migration, struggling to adapt. Entire administrative and troubleshooting tasks around server clusters, data centers, and networks have been ceded to third parties. Though some skills remain transferable, few cloud architects grasp intricacies of the organization's aging ERP system or database infrastructure; this increases risk of issues during any hybrid cloud transition. As veteran staffers with operations experience retire, replacement hires versed in application integration and container orchestration hardly fill the gap. This skill deficit leaves institutions vulnerable when the cloud fails, unable to diagnose internal causes or vendor SLA violations. Outages at leading providers like AWS and Azure have caused significant disruption, while misconfigurations account for nearly 80% of breaches; without in-house technical knowledge, resolving these problems relies entirely on outside support. Delays and downtime can cost millions. Facing this complexity gap, IT leaders must make reskilling existing teams a priority, rather than continued layoffs, while mandating documentation of legacy platforms and processes before that expertise permanently dissipates. Though the cloud journey has lifted basic burdens, organizations must take care not to outsource their entire technological competency along the way.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Legacy software systems play an important role in the economy but are known to cause high operational and maintenance costs. To reduce these costs, such systems are often migrated to modern infrastructure or languages. There exists a variety of migration strategies, however choosing the best strategy or combination of strategies given technical, economical and business constraints remains a challenging task. We observe a lack of experience reports on industrial migration projects explaining their decisions in detail. In this report, we present the case of an insurance system with 1M Source Lines of Code, running on an expensive mainframe and featuring Natural, Cobol, and Assembler code as well as an Adabas database. We elaborate on why state-of-practice migration strategies were inadequate in this case and introduce an alternative methodology, taking into account the limited budget for the migration. In this project, we use custom transpilation to translate the legacy code automatically to another programming language. In contrast to off-the-shelf transpilers, we implement an iteratively refined transpiler that is fine-tuned to the legacy code at hand. The transpiler guides its own development by pointing out instructions in the legacy code it cannot yet translate. Manual adaptions to the legacy code allow circumventing the implementation of overly complicated translation rules. This ensures the transpiler and the generated code remain lean and efficient while being able to cope with specific challenges of the system at hand. In the presented industrial case, Natural and Assembler sources were transpiled to Cobol running on Linux, combined with some adapted and rewritten Cobol and Java. We illustrate our lessons learned and provide in-depth insights into testing and debugging activities. A comparison with alternative offers by other vendors validates the economic benefits of this approach.
Article
Full-text available
Moving existing legacy systems to cloud platforms is a difficult and high cost process that may involve technical and non-technical resources and challenges. There is evidence that the lack of understanding and preparedness of cloud computing migration underpin many migration failures in achieving organi-sations' goals. The main goal of this article is to identify the most important challenging activities for moving legacy systems to cloud platforms from a perspective of reengineering process. Through a combination of a bottom-up and a top-down analysis, a set of common activities is derived from the extant cloud computing literature. These are expressed as a model and are validated using a population of 104 shortlisted and randomly selected domain experts from different industry sectors. We used a Web-based survey questionnaire to collect data and analysed them using SPSS Sample T-Test. The results of this study highlight the most important and critical challenges that should be addressed by various roles within a legacy to cloud migration endeavour. The study provides an overall understanding of this process including common occurring activities, concerns and recommendations. In addition, the findings of this study constitute a practical guide to conduct this transition. This guide is platform agnostic and independent from any specific migration scenario, cloud platform, or an application domain.
Chapter
Insurance 4.0 is not only a digital transformation. The business model canvasModelsbusiness model canvas has several components. All of them are essential in digital transformation. Process transformation is one of its key performance activities. Processes are at the very base of insurance 4.0. They are robustly impacted by it. Its re-engineering is a critical success factor. This chapter provides guidelines on processes to support insurance 4.0. It underlines a clear line capable of linking insurance companies with their objectives. This chapter considers some of the more critical processes, such as underwriting. The chapter also analyzes the risk management process. It shows how resilience is the real way to manage risks in the processes. One of the significant benefits, included with the adoption of these digital technologies, is the possibility for companies to better forecast risks and customer demand, transforming companies’ value proposition from “reactive claims payer to preventive risk advisors” (Price Waterhouse CoopersConsultants and AdvisoryPrice Waterhouse Coopers (PWC). [2017]. A marketplace without boundaries? Responding to disruption goo.gl/p8Hs9b. Accessed 30 May 2020), lowering prices and shaping their targets.
Article
This article examines the short- and long-run dynamic relationships exhibited between economic growth and growth in the insurance industry for nine OECD countries. This is achieved by conducting a cointegration analysis on a unique set of annual data for real GDP and total real premiums issued in each country from 1961 to 1996. Causality tests are also conducted, which account for long-run trends within the data. The results from the tests suggest that in some countries, the insurance industry Granger causes economic growth, and in other countries, the reverse is true. Moreover, the results indicate that these relationships are country specific and any discussion of whether the insurance industry does promote economic growth will be dependent on a number of national circumstances.