Content uploaded by Santhosh Varatharajan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Santhosh Varatharajan on Mar 09, 2025
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
Enabling De-Customization of PeopleSoft Through
Cloud Migration for Improved Student Outcomes
Santhosh Varatharajan
Sr Specialist, Microsoft Corporation, Apex North Carolina, USA
Email: santhosh.email4u[at]gmail.com
Abstract: Higher education institutions rely on PeopleSoft as a critical enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution to manage student
records, financial aid, human resources, and other administrative functions. However, excessive customizations have led to increased
complexity, higher maintenance costs, and hindered upgrades, ultimately affecting student outcomes. This paper explores how migrating
PeopleSoft to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) enables universities to streamline operations by reducing unnecessary customizations.
By leveraging OCI’s advanced automation, scalability, and security, institutions can adopt a clean configuration approach that enhances
system reliability, improves service delivery, and supports data - driven decision - making to drive better student experiences.
Keywords: PeopleSoft Migration, Enterprise Resource Planning, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Security, Customization, Compliance
1. Introduction
PeopleSoft has been a foundational ERP system for
universities, providing essential academic and
administrative functionalities. Over the years, institutions
have extensively customized PeopleSoft to align with unique
business processes [1]. However, these customizations have
increased system maintenance complexity, constrained
scalability, and delayed the adoption of new features that
could improve student services. Cloud migration presents an
opportunity to simplify and modernize PeopleSoft
deployments, allowing institutions to eliminate redundant
customizations while leveraging standard functionalities to
enhance efficiency and student outcomes [2].
2. Challenges of On - Premises PeopleSoft
Customizations
2.1 Legacy Customizations and Their Impact on Student
Experience
• Obsolete Customizations: Many modifications that
once addressed institutional needs are now redundant due
to advancements in delivered PeopleSoft features [3].
• Upgrade Complexity: Maintaining custom workflows
and integrations makes it difficult to adopt newer
PeopleSoft versions, delaying access to improved
functionalities [4].
• Administrative Inefficiencies: Customizations can
create process inconsistencies that lead to inefficiencies
in enrollment, financial aid distribution, and student
advising [5].
2.2 Performance and Scalability Constraints
• Resource Limitations: On - premises PeopleSoft
deployments require substantial infrastructure
management, limiting universities’ ability to scale
resources effectively [6].
• Peak Usage Bottlenecks: Registration, financial aid
disbursement, and course enrollment periods often cause
performance issues, frustrating students and staff [7].
2.3 Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Risks
• Data Integrity Challenges: Legacy environments may
lack robust disaster recovery and backup mechanisms,
increasing the risk of data loss [8].
• Compliance and Security Risks: On - premises
deployments require extensive security management,
making compliance with evolving data protection
regulations more complex [9].
3. How Cloud Migration Enables De -
Customization for Student Success
Migrating PeopleSoft to OCI provides institutions with a
robust cloud - native environment that simplifies operations,
eliminates unnecessary customizations, and improves
service delivery for students [10].
3.1 Standardization Through Delivered Functionality
• Leveraging PeopleSoft 9.2 Features: The latest version
includes pre - built capabilities that replace many legacy
customizations [11].
• Adopting a Clean Configuration Approach: Reducing
reliance on custom workflows and reports ensures easier
upgrades and streamlined system maintenance [12].
3.2 Cost Efficiency and Operational Agility
• Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Cloud
migration eliminates the need for physical infrastructure,
reducing costs by up to 52% [13].
• Optimized Resource Allocation: IT teams can focus on
innovation and student services instead of system
maintenance [14].
3.3 Performance and Scalability Improvements
• Dynamic Scaling: OCI adjusts resources automatically
to handle peak periods such as registration and financial
aid processing [15].
Paper ID: SR25305090834
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25305090834
204
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
• Faster System Responses: High - performance
computing infrastructure accelerates transaction
processing, improving the student experience [16].
3.4 Disaster Recovery and Security Enhancements
• Automated Backups and High Availability: OCI
ensures data integrity with built - in disaster recovery
capabilities [17].
• Stronger Security Controls: Features like Transparent
Data Encryption (TDE) protect sensitive student records
from cyber threats [18].
3.5 PeopleSoft Cloud Manager: Simplifying Cloud
Migration
PeopleSoft Cloud Manager plays a crucial role in
streamlining the transition from on - premises to OCI [19,
20]. This tool provides an intuitive interface for automating
deployment, patching, and lifecycle management. With its
easy - to - use features, universities can efficiently migrate
to their PeopleSoft environments with minimal disruption
[21]. Cloud Manager allows institutions to lift and shift
existing configurations while enabling post - migration
optimization, making cloud adoption smoother and reducing
manual administrative tasks [22]. This automation ensures
that universities can focus on enhancing student services
rather than managing IT complexities.
Figure 1: PeopleSoft Cloud Manager
4. Roadmap for Universities: Transitioning to
Cloud for De - Customization
Phase 1: Assessment and Planning
• Conduct a comprehensive audit of existing
customizations.
• Engage stakeholders to determine which modifications
are essential.
• Define a roadmap for adopting standard PeopleSoft
functionalities.
Phase 2: Cloud Migration and Optimization
• Implement a lift - and - shift migration strategy with
PeopleSoft Cloud Manager.
• Optimize system configurations for performance and
security.
• Remove obsolete customizations and leverage delivered
functionality.
Phase 3: Post - Migration Enhancement
• Utilize automated testing frameworks to ensure system
stability.
• Conduct training programs to increase user adoption of
standard features.
• Continuously monitor system performance to improve
student service delivery.
5. Conclusion
Migrating PeopleSoft to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure enables
higher education institutions to move away from complex,
costly, and difficult - to - maintain customizations. By
embracing standard PeopleSoft functionalities, universities
can simplify system management, reduce costs, and improve
scalability. OCI’s automation, security, and disaster recovery
capabilities ensure long - term stability, allowing institutions
to focus on student success rather than IT maintenance [23].
The transition to cloud - based PeopleSoft deployments is a
strategic step toward enhancing operational efficiency and
delivering an optimized student experience.
References
[1] H. K. Mukkamala, “Critical Success Factors for the
Implementation of PeopleSoft Enterprise Resource
Planning in a Public organization.,” Doctoral
dissertation, Wilmington University, 2025. Accessed:
Feb.25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https:
//www.proquest.
com/openview/3ea29ccd82ac308fc42fc1167955f928/
1?pq - origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
[2] H. Trivedi, “Cloud Computing Adoption Model for
Governments and Large Enterprises,” Doctoral
dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
2013. Accessed: Feb.24, 2025. [Online]. Available:
http: //hdl. handle. net/1721.1/80675
[3] L. Anderson, Understanding PeopleSoft 8. New York,
NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[4] A. R. Kunduru and R. Kandepu, “Data Archival
Methodology in Enterprise Resource Planning
Applications (Oracle ERP, Peoplesoft), ” Journal of
Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science,
vol.38, no.9, pp.115–127, 2023, doi: https:
//sdfswk3123. s3. eu - west - 2. amazonaws.
com/Kunduru3892023JAMCS103134. pdf.
[5] M. Bradford, “North Carolina State University:
Implementing ERP Student Modules, ” Issues in
Accounting Education, vol.26, no.3, pp.507–520,
Aug.2011, doi: https: //doi. org/10.2308/iace - 50037.
[6] M. A. Valashani and A. M. Abukari, “ERP Systems
Architecture for the Modern age: A Review of the State
of the Art Technologies, ” Journal of Applied
Intelligent Systems and Information Sciences, vol.1,
no.2, pp.70–90, Aug.2020, doi: https: //doi.
org/10.22034/jaisis.2020.232506.1009.
[7] C. Madera, “The Study of Peoplesoft Information
System, ” Journal of MIS[at]UB, vol.2, no.1, pp.134–
144, 2019, Accessed: Feb.23, 2025. [Online].
Available: https: //ojs. ub. edu. bz/index.
php/rndj/article/view/193
[8] S. Purewal, “PeopleSoft Security, ” in Encyclopedia of
Information Assurance - 4 Volume, R. Herold and M.
Paper ID: SR25305090834
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25305090834
205
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN: 2319-7064
Impact Factor 2024: 7.101
Volume 14 Issue 3, March 2025
Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journal
www.ijsr.net
K. Rogers, Eds., New York: Auerbach Publications,
2010.
[9] A. Engelsrud, Managing PeopleSoft on the Oracle
Cloud. New York: Apress, 2019.
[10] R. Deng and P. Benckendorff, “Technology - Enabled
Learning,” in Handbook of e - Tourism, Z. Xiang, M.
Fuchs, U. Gretzel, and W. Höpken, Eds., Berlin:
Springer, Cham, 2020, pp.1–27. doi: https: //doi.
org/10.1007/978 - 3 - 030 - 05324 - 6_129 - 1.
[11] L. Zagata, “Leveraging Features and Functionality in
PeopleSoft 9, ” Slideplayer, 2017. https: //slideplayer.
com/slide/13040120/ (accessed Feb.23, 2025).
[12] A. Engelsrud, “Updating PeopleSoft Cloud Manager,”
in Managing PeopleSoft on the Oracle Cloud, A.
Engelsrud, Ed., Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2019, pp.263–
287. doi: https: //doi. org/10.1007/978 - 1 - 4842 - 4546
- 0_11.
[13] O. B. Johnson, J. Olamijuwon, Y. W. Weldegeorgise,
and O. Soji, “Designing a Comprehensive Cloud
Migration Framework for high - revenue Financial
services: a Case Study on Efficiency and Cost
Management, ” Open Access Research Journal of
Science and Technology, vol.12, no.2, pp.058–069,
Nov.2024, doi: https: //doi.
org/10.53022/oarjst.2024.12.2.0141.
[14] S. Wilson and K. Velayutham, “Creating an
Innovation‐oriented Technology Strategy,” On the
Horizon, vol.17, no.3, pp.245–255, Aug.2009, doi:
https: //doi. org/10.1108/10748120910993277.
[15] M. Kvet, Developing Robust Date and Time Oriented
Applications in Oracle Cloud: a Comprehensive Guide
to Efficient Date and Time Management in Oracle
Cloud. Birmingham, US: Packt Publishing Ltd, 2023.
[16] T. Sterling, M. Brodowicz, and M. Anderson, High
Performance Computing: Modern Systems and
Practices. Cambridge, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2017.
[17] M. Malcher and D. Kuhn, “Data Management, ” in Pro
Oracle Database 23ai Administration, M. Malcher and
D. Kuhn, Eds., Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2024, pp.557–
580. doi: https: //doi. org/10.1007/979 - 8 - 8688 - 1038
- 1_18.
[18] G. Du and J. Liu, “Rethinking Data Security in
Aggregated Databases: Beyond Encryption, ” in 2022
7th International Conference on Signal and Image
Processing (ICSIP), Jul.2024, pp.526–530. doi: https:
//doi. org/10.1109/icsip61881.2024.10671482.
[19] S. R. Bauskar, M. S. Reddy, M. Sarisa, and S.
Konkimalla, The Future of Cloud Computing_ Al -
Driven Deep Learning and Neural Network
Innovations. Anamnagar, Nepal: Budha Publishers,
2024.
[20] S. Thompson, “Optimizing Cloud Migration: Best
Practices and Lessons Learned, ” EPH - International
Journal of Science And Engineering, vol.10, no.2,
pp.1–17, 2024, doi: https: //doi. org/10.53555/ephijse.
v10i2.268.
[21] Oracle, “Manage Cloud Manager Users, Roles, and
Permission Lists, ” 2021. https: //docs. oracle.
com/en/applications/peoplesoft/cloud -
manager/tutorial - manage - users - roles/index.
html#before_you_begin (accessed Feb.24, 2025).
[22] N. Ahmad, Q. N. Naveed, and N. Hoda, “Strategy and
Procedures for Migration to the Cloud Computing, ”
2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on
Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences
(ICETAS), pp.1–5, Nov.2018, doi: https: //doi.
org/10.1109/icetas.2018.8629101.
[23] A. G. Green and M. P. Gutmann, “Building
Partnerships among Social Science researchers,
Institution‐based Repositories and Domain Specific
Data Archives, ” OCLC Systems & Services:
International Digital Library Perspectives, vol.23,
no.1, pp.35–53, Feb.2007, doi: https: //doi.
org/10.1108/10650750710720757.
Paper ID: SR25305090834
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR25305090834
206