Public transit systems are receiving increased attention as viable solutions to problems with transportation system reliability, energy-efficiency and equity. Equity considerations range from ensuring that the network is fully “connected” (avoiding the “you can’t get there from here” problem), to providing access to critical destinations (e.g., grocery stores or health care facilities) for people
... [Show full abstract] without cars. Energy-efficiency gains in transit systems result when there are higher vehicle-occupancy rates that lower energy use per passenger-mile but are challenging to attain in rural areas.
Vermont is currently served with fixed-route, flexible fixed-route, and demand-response transit bus service provided by 12 different agencies, each representing a geographical region of the state. The objective of this project was to use GIS-based analysis of land use patterns to generate state-wide transit networks based on different optimization criteria and to compare these hypothetical networks to the existing network. The geocoded Vermont E911 database that represents all buildings in Vermont was used.
The results of the study indicate differences between the existing and hypothetical optimal transit routes. A substantial portion of the population is located in dense clusters that could support energy-efficient fixed-route transit. The state’s existing transit network combines elements of efficiency and equity in its “total network length” throughout the state. Over-served and underserved areas were identified. Clarifying the distinction between equity and efficiency will aid in the development of more effective goals and measures for the transit providers.