A preview of this full-text is provided by The Royal Society.
Content available from Philosophical Transactions B
This content is subject to copyright.
The avian respiratory system: implications
foranaesthesia
John Ludders
Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
JL,0000-0001-7511-6890
Anaesthesia is not a natural state for any animal, including birds. The
unique anatomic and physiological attributes of the class Aves that have
made it possible for birds to inhabit every continent on this planet and
to live in a variety of environments, some considered challenging if not
inhospitable to mammals, pose challenges to their anaesthetic management.
Indeed, it is more challenging than the anaesthetic management of
mammals, a reality substantiated by the fact that the risk of anaesthesia-
related death of birds is up to 20 times higher than for dogs and cats. This
article highlights those anatomic (respiratory system, renal–portal system),
physiological (gas exchange, respiratory control mechanisms in respiratory
brainstem and peripheral chemoreceptor areas, including intrapulmonary
chemoreceptors) and pharmacological attributes (pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics) that make anaesthetic management, both inhalant and
injectable anaesthesia, of birds challenging, and how those challenges are
managed.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘The biology of the avian
respiratory system’.
1. Introduction
The unique anatomic and physiological attributes of the class Aves have
made it possible for birds to inhabit every continent on this planet and live
in a variety of environments, some of which are considered challenging if
not inhospitable to mammals. It is plausible that the highly efficient avian
respiratory system is largely responsible for this success. The fossil record
strongly suggests that the microstructure of the preserved lung presumably
had considerable functional utility, and suggests that the general structural
design of the avian lung has been conserved for a very long time [1]. It is
possible that the avian lung enabled birds to attain powered flight, with at
least two significant evolutionary consequences: (1) wide dispersal across this
planet, which led to adaptive radiation, resulting in the class Aves being the
most species-rich of the amniote clades, and may have contributed to (2) the
survival of their descendants through the Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction
event [1].
Anaesthesia is not a natural state for any animal, including birds, and
the attributes that enable birds to survive in their natural environments pose
challenges to their anaesthetic management. The fact that the avian pulmo-
nary system differs significantly from that of mammals led investigators in
the early to mid 1900s to conclude that the nature of the avian respiratory
system rendered the use of inhalant anaesthetics, such as ether and halothane,
unusable for anaesthesia of birds [2]. That view was based on the mistaken
belief that avian air sacs retained inhalant anaesthetics, or that inhalant
anaesthetics were concentrated in the air sacs and lungs, thus producing
death by anaesthetic overdose [2,3]. In the 1960s, subsequent studies of ether
[3] and halothane [2,4] demonstrated that volatile anaesthetics can be used to
reliably produce anaesthesia in birds. However, the tremendous diversity in
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
Review
Cite this article: Ludders J. 2025 The avian
respiratory system: implications for anaesthesia.
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380: 20230439.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0439
Received: 15 April 2024
Accepted: 23 September 2024
One contribution of 18 to a theme issue ‘The
biology of the avian respiratory system’.
Subject Areas:
physiology
Keywords:
analgesics, anaesthesia, anaesthetics, birds,
minimum anaesthetic concentration,
pharmacokinetics
Author for correspondence:
John Ludders
e-mail: jwl1@cornell.edu