ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Beyond Confinement: A Systematic Review on Factors Influencing Binge Drinking Among Adolescents and Young Adults During the Pandemic

MDPI
Journal of Clinical Medicine (JCM)
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Objectives: This study aimed to enhance the understanding of factors influencing changes in binge drinking (BD) behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on its impact on the health of individuals aged 12 to 25 years. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, encompassing studies published between January 2020 and September 2024. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) review protocols. Inclusion criteria targeted studies focusing on BD during the COVID-19 pandemic in adolescents or school-aged individuals without specific medical conditions. Exclusions included studies limited to a single gender, ethnicity, or profession, as well as doctoral theses and editorials. JBI tools were used to assess the quality of the selected studies. Results: From 33 studies (19 cross-sectional and 14 longitudinal), trends in BD during the pandemic varied: 2 studies reported an increase, while 21 indicated a decrease. Key factors linked to increased BD included pandemic stressors (e.g., isolation, social disconnection and non-compliance with restrictions), psychosocial issues (e.g., depression, anxiety, boredom, and low resilience), prior substance use, and sociodemographic variables (e.g., low education, economic extremes, living arrangements, and limited family support). Female gender and academic disengagement were also risk factors. Conversely, factors like stay-at-home orders, fear of contagion, family support, studying health sciences, and resilient coping strategies contributed to reduced BD. Other variables, such as pandemic stress and self-efficacy, had inconsistent effects. Conclusions: Factors contributing to increased BD included pandemic-related stress, mental health conditions, and unhealthy habits, while protective factors included stay-at-home orders, social support, and resilient coping. The study highlights the need for effective prevention and intervention strategies, emphasizing a holistic approach in healthcare, early detection, and tailored interventions, particularly for vulnerable groups such as adolescents.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Academic Editor: Icro Maremmani
Received: 6 January 2025
Revised: 21 February 2025
Accepted: 22 February 2025
Published: 25 February 2025
Citation: Merino-Casquero, A.;
Andrade-Gómez, E.; Fagundo-Rivera,
J.; Fernández-León, P. Beyond
Confinement: A Systematic Review on
Factors Influencing Binge Drinking
Among Adolescents and Young
Adults During the Pandemic. J. Clin.
Med. 2025,14, 1546. https://doi.org/
10.3390/jcm14051546
Copyright: © 2025 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license
(https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/).
Review
Beyond Confinement: A Systematic Review on Factors
Influencing Binge Drinking Among Adolescents and Young
Adults During the Pandemic
Andrea Merino-Casquero
1
, Elena Andrade-Gómez
2,
* , Javier Fagundo-Rivera
3,
* and Pablo Fernández-León
3,4
1Cruces University Hospital, Osakidetza-Basque Health Service, 48903 Bizkaia, Spain
2Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain
3Red Cross University Nursing Centre, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
4School of Doctorate, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
*Correspondence: elena.andrade@unirioja.es (E.A.-G.); javier.fagundo@cruzroja.es (J.F.-R.);
Tel.: +34-941299065 (E.A.-G.); +34-954350997 (J.F.-R.)
Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to enhance the understanding of factors influ-
encing changes in binge drinking (BD) behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a
particular focus on its impact on the health of individuals aged 12 to 25 years. Methods:
A systematic review was conducted, encompassing studies published between January
2020 and September 2024. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and
Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) review proto-
cols. Inclusion criteria targeted studies focusing on BD during the COVID-19 pandemic
in adolescents or school-aged individuals without specific medical conditions. Exclusions
included studies limited to a single gender, ethnicity, or profession, as well as doctoral
theses and editorials. JBI tools were used to assess the quality of the selected studies.
Results: From 33 studies (19 cross-sectional and 14 longitudinal), trends in BD during the
pandemic varied: 2 studies reported an increase, while 21 indicated a decrease. Key factors
linked to increased BD included pandemic stressors (e.g., isolation, social disconnection
and non-compliance with restrictions), psychosocial issues (e.g., depression, anxiety, bore-
dom, and low resilience), prior substance use, and sociodemographic variables (e.g., low
education, economic extremes, living arrangements, and limited family support). Female
gender and academic disengagement were also risk factors. Conversely, factors like stay-
at-home orders, fear of contagion, family support, studying health sciences, and resilient
coping strategies contributed to reduced BD. Other variables, such as pandemic stress and
self-efficacy, had inconsistent effects. Conclusions: Factors contributing to increased BD
included pandemic-related stress, mental health conditions, and unhealthy habits, while
protective factors included stay-at-home orders, social support, and resilient coping. The
study highlights the need for effective prevention and intervention strategies, emphasizing
a holistic approach in healthcare, early detection, and tailored interventions, particularly
for vulnerable groups such as adolescents.
Keywords: binge drinking; alcohol abuse; alcohol consumption; the COVID-19 pandemic;
adolescents; young adults; risk factors; prevention; wellbeing; public health
1. Introduction
Alcohol consumption is a considerable public health concern that plays an important
role in our society and culture. Based on the latest Global Status Report on Alcohol and
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051546
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 2 of 25
Health and Treatment of Substance Use Disorders [
1
], 2.6 million deaths were attributable
to alcohol consumption in 2019, representing 4.7% of all deaths in that year. The WHO
European Region continues to have the highest level of per capita alcohol consumption
in the world [
2
], despite a decrease from 12 L in 2000 to 9.5 L in 2019, which corresponds
to a decrease of 10% in 2010 and 21% in 2019. It should also be noted that Europe is the
WHO region with the highest percentage of deaths attributable to alcohol consumption
(10.1%) [
3
]. In Spain, an estimated 13,887 deaths were attributable to alcohol consumption
in 2021 [
4
]. Moreover, over 90% of the population aged 15 to 64 report having consumed
alcohol at some point in their lives [
5
]. These figures highlight alcohol consumption as a
significant public health concern, particularly considering that they account only for the
direct effects on consumers and do not include harm to third parties [6].
Adolescents and young adults are a particularly vulnerable population about devel-
oping harmful patterns of alcohol consumption, such as binge drinking (BD), which may
emerge during this developmental stage and become established. Binge drinking is defined
as the consumption of a large quantity of alcohol within a single occasion—typically five
or more alcoholic drinks for men and four or more for women—resulting in a state of
intoxication, which is subsequently followed by periods of abstinence [
7
]. This drinking
pattern has severe long-term consequences, including traffic accidents, violence, homicide,
suicide, early and high-risk sexual behavior, academic and occupational failure, mental
disorders, and delinquency. Additionally, it leads to short-term effects such as alcohol
poisoning, loss of consciousness, and memory blackouts [
8
]. Globally, the prevalence of BD
was 18.2% in 2018, which amounts to one billion people worldwide [
3
]. Furthermore, it
shows high picks of frequency and more percentages of episodes in adolescents and young
adults [912].
Since December 2019, the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coro-
navirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the primary causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) pandemic, has led to the declaration of a public health emergency of inter-
national concern. This pandemic has resulted in more than 776 million confirmed cases
and over 7 million deaths [
13
]. The global nature of this pandemic has profound economic,
social, and public health implications [
14
]. In this context, health behaviors play a crucial
role in sustaining health and preventing both infectious and non-infectious diseases. Al-
though individuals should have pursued multiple protective behaviors and avoid risky
behaviors, adherence to behavioral recommendations during COVID-19 was variable [
15
].
Specifically, alcohol consumption and BD behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic had a
significant influence with different and even opposite results between diverse countries
and population groups [
13
]. Several studies conducted during the pandemic have reported
divergent findings, indicating that BD patterns among adolescents and young adults were
influenced by lockdown measures in two distinct ways. While some individuals exhibited
an increase in these behaviors [16,17], others reported a decline [18,19].
Although the existing evidence suggests various factors that may contribute to the
increase or decrease of BD among teenagers and early adulthood population during the
COVID-19 pandemic, there appears to be a lack of systematic reviews that compile and stan-
dardize this information. Consequently, this study aims to bridge this gap by summarizing
and updating which factors modulate the increase or reduction of the alcohol BD pattern
during the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides a comprehensive overview of the relevant
literature and examines its implications for the health of adolescents and early adults.
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 3 of 25
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Protocol and Registration
The review process was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for sys-
tematic reviews [
20
] and followed the PRISMA statement [
21
] (Table S1. PRISMA checklist).
Furthermore, this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (code: CRD42024552338).
2.2. Design
For this systematic review, the PICO approach was adopted to structure the review
questions and define eligibility criteria:
P (population): adolescents and young adults;
I (intervention): binge drinking during the COVID-19 pandemic;
C (comparison): binge drinking before the COVID-19 pandemic;
O (outcome): modulating factors of the increase/reduction of the BD.
In adolescents and young adults (P), what were the modulating factors of the in-
crease/decrease in BD (O) before (C) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (I)?
2.3. Information Sources and Search Strategy
The searches were carried out in September 2024 in the Pubmed, Web of Science, and
Scopus (Science Direct) databases by two reviewers. A third reviewer acted in case of discrep-
ancies. Articles conducted on humans and published between January 2020 and September
2024 were selected. The search strategy included MeSH terms: (adolescent* OR youth*
OR teen* OR student*) AND (“binge drinking OR “binge alcohol consumption”) AND
(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR “COVID-19 pandemic” OR “Coronavirus Disease 2019”).
The search strategy in each database is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Search strategies in databases.
Database Search Strategy Search Date Outcomes
PubMed
(adolescent* OR youth* OR teen* OR student*) AND
(“binge drinking” OR “binge alcohol consumption”)
AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR “COVID-19
pandemic” OR “Coronavirus Disease 2019”).
2020–2024 75
WOS
(adolescent* OR youth* OR teen* OR student*) AND
(“binge drinking” OR “binge alcohol consumption”)
AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR “COVID-19
pandemic” OR “Coronavirus Disease 2019”).
2020–2024 152
Scopus
(adolescent OR youth OR teen OR student) AND
(“binge drinking” OR “binge alcohol consumption”)
AND (COVID-19 OR “COVID-19 pandemic”).
2020–2024 517
Total 744
2.4. Eligibility Criteria
The research inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original studies (quantitative or
qualitative design) that addressed binge drinking during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2)
studies carried out in adolescents and scholar-aged individuals, without specific patholo-
gies or medical conditions. The exclusion criteria for the research were as follows: (1)
documents focused on populations exclusively of one gender, profession, or ethnicity; (2)
systematic reviews, meta-analyses, doctoral dissertations, brief reports, conference proceed-
ings, commentaries, and editorial articles; and (3) studies with low quality in methodologi-
cal assessment according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 4 of 25
2.5. Selection and Data Collection Process
A total of 744 publications were identified through database searches. From this
initial pool, 141 duplicate entries were removed. Following a review of titles and abstracts,
465 articles were eliminated for failing to align with the specified objectives and research
questions. Subsequently, 138 reports were evaluated for eligibility, resulting in the exclusion
of 105 reports for various reasons (not related to the main objective (n= 44); design,
methodology, or article type (n= 25); not the population of interest (n= 34); low quality in
the methodological assessment (n= 2). Finally, 33 studies were included in the review. The
selection process and the rationale for exclusions are illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart
presented in Figure 1.
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 28
2.5. Selection and Data Collection Process
A total of 744 publications were identied through database searches. From this ini-
tial pool, 141 duplicate entries were removed. Following a review of titles and abstracts,
465 articles were eliminated for failing to align with the specied objectives and research
questions. Subsequently, 138 reports were evaluated for eligibility, resulting in the exclu-
sion of 105 reports for various reasons (not related to the main objective (n = 44); design,
methodology, or article type (n = 25); not the population of interest (n = 34); low quality in
the methodological assessment (n = 2). Finally, 33 studies were included in the review.
The selection process and the rationale for exclusions are illustrated in the PRISMA
owchart presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. PRISMA owchart.
2.6. Study Risk of Bias Assessment
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools have been designed for its use
in systematic reviews, enabling the assessment of the reliability, relevance, and outcomes
of published works. These critical appraisal tools were developed by the JBI and its col-
laborators and approved by the JBI Scientic Commiee following extensive peer review.
The quality of all selected articles was examined using dierent checklists, depending on
the type of study. In this regard, the tool for analytical cross-sectional studies and the tool
for cohort studies were used [22]. Studies scoring below half of the maximum possible
value (i.e., 4/8 or lower for analytical cross-sectional studies and 5/11 or lower for cohort
studies) were categorized as low quality and were thus removed from the nal selection
(Tables S2 and S3).
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart.
2.6. Study Risk of Bias Assessment
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools have been designed for its use
in systematic reviews, enabling the assessment of the reliability, relevance, and outcomes
of published works. These critical appraisal tools were developed by the JBI and its
collaborators and approved by the JBI Scientific Committee following extensive peer review.
The quality of all selected articles was examined using different checklists, depending on
the type of study. In this regard, the tool for analytical cross-sectional studies and the tool
for cohort studies were used [
22
]. Studies scoring below half of the maximum possible
value (i.e., 4/8 or lower for analytical cross-sectional studies and 5/11 or lower for cohort
studies) were categorized as low quality and were thus removed from the final selection
(Tables S2 and S3).
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 5 of 25
2.7. Synthesis Methods
In this systematic review, a narrative synthesis approach was employed to qualitatively
integrate and interpret the findings from the selected studies. This method facilitated a com-
prehensive and coherent analysis by identifying key themes, patterns, and inconsistencies
within the literature. By synthesizing diverse sources without the application of statistical
meta-analysis, this approach enabled the contextualization of evidence, the identification
of knowledge gaps, and the provision of meaningful insights into the research topic.
3. Results
3.1. Study Selection and Characteristics
A total of 33 studies were chosen for the systematic review after screening based on
the inclusion and exclusion criteria, title, abstract, and full text.
Table 2presents specific information about the 33 included studies [1619,2351].
The selected research studies were conducted across various countries, including
the United States [
18
,
19
,
23
,
31
,
33
,
34
,
37
,
38
,
44
], Italy [
25
], Germany [
26
], Australia [
27
],
Canada [
16
,
28
30
,
40
,
45
], France [
32
,
36
,
46
], Guatemala [
35
], United Kingdom [
17
], Spain [
39
],
Netherlands [
41
,
49
], Turkey [
42
], Israel [
43
], Belgium [
47
], Denmark [
48
], Portugal [
50
], and
Switzerland [51], and included one nationwide study [24].
The studies focused on specific periods of the pandemic. For instance, some studies examined
a single month, such as April 2020 [
24
] and May 2020 [
26
]. Other investigations covered a range
of months within 2020, including March to May [
25
,
46
], April to May [
19
,
32
,
47
], April to June [
49
],
February to March and July to August [
34
], April to July [
41
], May to June [
42
], May to July
2020 [
40
], April to September [
43
], April to November [
37
,
50
], August to November [
48
], and
October to December [
33
]. Additionally, some studies spanned broader timeframes, such as 2009
to 2021 [
31
], 2015 to 2020 [
17
], 2017 to 2020 (including May–June 2020) [
27
], 2017 to 2021 [
29
], 2018
to 2021 [28,30], 2019 to 2020 [18,35,39], and 2020 to 2021 [16,23,36,38,44,45,51].
The studies indicated that the estimated mean age was 21 years, with an age range
varied from 12 to 25 years. Furthermore, the average proportion of female participants
across all studies was found to be 65%.
The studies indicate a varied prevalence of BD, with some reporting an increase in
trends [16,17], while others have noted a decline [18,19,24,25,27,28,31,32,3539,4143,4650].
The research includes 19 cross-sectional studies [
19
,
23
26
,
31
36
,
40
43
,
46
49
] and 14
longitudinal studies [1618,2730,3739,44,45,50,51].
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 6 of 25
Table 2. Study selection.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Ahuja et al.,
2024.
USA.
[23]
2020–2021
To examine the relationship
between loneliness and
varying levels of alcohol
consumption among
college students in a rural
region of the United States
during the COVID-19
pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 310) people
of a same region;
age range: 18–25 (mean =
21.3; SD = 1.9 years); 69.7%
women; 30.3% men.
UCLA-3 loneliness scale;
binge drinking: “During the last 12
months, how often did you have 5
or more (for males) or 4 or more
(for females) drinks containing any
kind of alcohol in within a
two-hour period?”
logistic regression analysis to
assess the association between
loneliness binge drinking, heavy
alcohol use, and weekly alcohol
use.
The prevalence of binge drinking was found to be 11.0% (n
= 34) of the sample. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted
in increased feelings of isolation and disconnection among
many students, rendering them more vulnerable to
experiencing loneliness. Severe loneliness was significantly
associated with a higher likelihood of binge drinking
(AOR = 2.96; 95% CI: [1.16, 7.51]). Furthermore, lifetime
regular smoking was also correlated with binge drinking
(AOR = 4.68; 95% CI: [1.85, 11.81]).
6/8
Ammar et al.,
2020.
International
[24]
April 2020
To elucidate the behavioral
and lifestyle consequences
(on physical activity and
nutrition behaviours) of
COVID-19 restrictions.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 1047) people
from Asia, Africa, Europe,
America and others;
age range: 18 to +55 (55.1%
from 18 to 35 years; 35.1%
from 36 to 55 years);
54% women and 46% men.
International online survey on
mental health and
multi-dimensional lifestyle
behaviors before and during home
confinement;
SDBQ-L (Question 4. Alcohol
Binge Drinking);
t-tests and effect size (Cohen’s d)
were used.
Prevalence of binge drinking included 12.31% (n= 129) of
the sample before COVID-19 and 6.79% (n= 71) during
confinement. The COVID-19 home confinement had a
positive healthy effect on alcohol binge drinking, whose
prevalence decreased significantly (t = 12.16, p< 0.001;
effect size: d = 0.58). The responses that indicated alcohol
binge drinking were lower during home confinement (5.4%
for sometimes, 1.2% for most of the time, and 0.2% for
always).
Alternatively, COVID-19 home confinement had a negative
effect on all levels of physical activity, increased
sedentarism and revealed unhealthy patterns of food
consumption.
6/8
Bianchi et al.,
2021
Italy
[25]
March–May 2020
To investigate binge
drinking and binge eating
behaviors among emerging
adults in Italy during the
COVID-19 lockdown, while
examining potential
changes in these behaviors
in comparison to the
pre-pandemic period.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of n= 1925
emerging adults;
mean age: 24.18 (SD = 2.75
years); age range: 18–29
years;
71.9% women and 28.1%
men.
BD: “During the last 30 days before
the introduction of national
lockdown, how many times have
you drunk 5 or more alcoholic
drinks—4 if you are female—on
one single occasion?”; and during
the current quarantine (i.e.,
“During the current period of
lockdown, how many times have
you drunk 5 or more alcoholic
drinks—4 if you are female—on
one single occasion?”).
Three MANOVA analyses were
conducted.
During the quarantine period, the incidence of binge
drinking (BD) episodes demonstrated a significant decline.
Nonetheless, 320 participants (16.6%) reported
experiencing BD, while 84 participants (4.4%) indicated an
increase in the frequency of BD during the lockdown.
Participants with primary or middle school education, as
opposed to those with higher educational attainment, along
with individuals from lower economic backgrounds, were
more likely to belong to the BD increase group. Conversely,
participants residing with their families exhibited a
reduced likelihood of reporting BD; those living alone, with
partners, or with other individuals during the lockdown
were more frequently categorized in the BD increase group.
No statistically significant differences were observed
concerning pandemic-related stress or social support
among the BD increase groups.
7/8
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 7 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Bonar et al.,
2021
USA
[19]
April–May 2020
To examine first-year
college students’ binge
drinking habits after their
university’s
pandemic-related
suspension of in-person
operations and investigate
differences in demographic,
psychosocial and
COVID-19-related variables
among students.
Cross-sectional
study
Students from a single
university campus (n= 741);
mean age = 18.05 (SD = 0.22
years);
472 women (63.6%) and
269 men (36.3%).
COVID-19-related variables;
sex-specific binge drinking
frequency pre- and post-campus
closure;
20-item Drinking Motives
Questionnaire.
Non-parametric paired t-test, and
variable contrast using chi-square
and F-tests were used.
The study examined binge drinking prevalence before and
after the COVID-19 campus closure. Results showed a
decrease in binge drinking frequency, with M pre = 1.54
(SD = 1.38) and M post = 0.72 (SD = 1.10). While 49.66% of
students did not binge drink at either time, 6.75%
maintained consistent binge drinking behavior. Notably,
39.41% reported reduced binge drinking post-closure,
while 4.18% increased their binge drinking. Additionally,
19.35% shifted from abstaining from alcohol to binge
drinking after the closure, and 33.22% who previously
binge drank stopped entirely. Lower post-closure binge
drinking was linked to coping motives and feelings of
isolation, while higher levels were associated with Greek
life involvement. Non-binge drinkers experienced
significantly less isolation and loneliness due to COVID-19.
6/8
Busse et al.,
2021
Germany
[26]
May 2020
To investigate the impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic,
with particular emphasis on
the lockdown period, on the
engagement in
health-related behaviors
(HRBs) among university
students in Germany
Cross-sectional
study
Sample consisted on
(n= 5021) students of four
German universities;
age range: 17 to 25; mean
age = 24.4 (SD = 5.1 years);
69% women and 29% men.
A web-based survey using the HRB
scale (with pre-during pandemic
questions): (item 3) binge drinking,
consisting on the question “How
often do you have six or more
drinks on a single occasion?”;
8-item Center for Epidemiologic
Studies—Depression Scale.
Descriptive analysis and
multinomial logistic regression
analyses were used.
A latent transition analysis among
substance use behavior (smoking,
binge drinking, and cannabis use)
was conducted.
A total of 45.8% of students (n= 4965) reported engaging in
binge drinking both before and during the COVID-19
pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, 2% of students indicated
binge drinking more than once per week, which increased
to 4% during the pandemic. Nearly half of the participants
acknowledged binge drinking before the pandemic, while
24.4% reported a decrease in such behavior during this
period, and 5.4% noted an increase; however, 70.2%
experienced no changes in their binge drinking patterns.
Factors contributing to increased binge drinking included
depressive symptoms, boredom, and complex
relationships. Interestingly, women and younger
individuals were more likely to reduce their binge drinking
during the pandemic. Additionally, a significant
co-occurrence of smoking, binge drinking, and cannabis
use was observed among the student population.
7/8
Clare et al., 2021
Australia
[27]
Four phases:
1. September 2017–July
2018;
2. September 2018–May
2019;
3. August 2019–January
2020;
4. May–June 2020.
To estimate the changes in
alcohol consumption
among young people
during the COVID-19
restrictions and to analyze
whether these changes
varied by gender and
pre-pandemic consumption
levels
Prospective
longitudinal cohort
study
Subsample of a cohort
(n= 443) of secondary
school students;
mean age: 19.7 (SD = 0.5
years);
60.8% women and 39.2%
men;
data from the Australian
Parental Supply of Alcohol
Longitudinal Study.
Sociodemographic: time, gender,
and level of consumption prior to
the pandemic. In addition,
frequency and typical quantity of
alcohol consumption, binge
drinking, peak consumption,
alcohol-related harm and drinking
contexts.
Frequency of binge drinking:
participants who reported any
alcohol consumption were asked
how often they consumed 5
standard drinks.
During the COVID-19 restrictions, young Australians
experienced a significant reduction in overall alcohol
consumption, binge drinking, and alcohol-related harms.
Binge drinking rates were stable prior to the pandemic but
declined by 28% from February to May–June 2020. During
this period, the proportion of participants abstaining from
binge drinking increased from 35.3% to 50.0%, while those
reporting sporadic binge drinking decreased from 50.6% to
40.8%. Additionally, the prevalence of weekly binge
drinking fell from 14.1% to 9.2%. These changes in drinking
patterns were observed across genders, though the decline
in overall consumption was notably significant among
women. The main motivations for binge drinking included
feelings of boredom and limited engagement in activities.
8/11
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 8 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Dumas et al.,
2022
Canada
[16]
Four phases:
T1: April 2020;
T2: August to September
2020;
T3: January to February
2021;
T4: June 2021.
To investigate adolescent
substance use patterns
throughout the pandemic,
emphasizing the impact of
stay-at-home orders and
re-opening phases
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of n= 1068
adolescent students; age
range: 14–18 years; mean
age = 16.95 (SD = 0.84 years);
76.7% women and 23.3%
men.
The study included demographic
questions and inquiries related to
substance use during the pandemic.
Binge drinking is operationally
defined as the intake of four or
more standard drinks for females
and five or more for males in one
sitting, where a standard drink is
equivalent to 341 mL of beer,
142 mL of wine, 43 mL of liquor, or
341 mL of a premixed beverage.
Before the pandemic, the prevalence of binge drinking was
19.4%. The study identified variations in binge drinking
rates across different lockdown phases: a low of 9.4%
during the first lockdown (T1), a peak of 20.8% after
restrictions were lifted (T2), a decrease to 17.8% during the
second lockdown (T3), and a stabilization at 18.6%
following the third lockdown (T4). Statistical analyses
revealed that participants exhibited a significantly higher
likelihood of abstaining from binge drinking during T1
compared to later phases, with increased abstinence from
T2 to T4 (p< 0.001). Additionally, adolescents
demonstrated a decreased propensity for binge drinking
after the initial stay-at-home orders were lifted.
9/11
Fruehwirth
et al., 2021
USA
[18]
Wave I: October 2019 and
February 2020 (prior to
the pandemic).
Wave II: June/July 2020.
To study how COVID-19
stress-related factors and
changes in social
engagement during the
pandemic contributed to
changes in alcohol use
among first-year college
students.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of n= 439 first-year,
university students;
age range: 18–20 years;
mean age = 18.9
(SD = 0.018);
72% women, 28% men.
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance
System: analysis of prevalence and
days of binge drinking.
Associations between pre- and
intra-pandemic stressors and social
engagement were established. All
models were estimated as a
function of COVID-19
stressors/stress and social
engagement variables.
Over the past 30 days, the prevalence of binge drinking
(BD) among participants significantly declined from 35.5%
to 24.6%, particularly during the initial wave of data
collection, with a corresponding decrease in binge drinking
days; however, the overall frequency of alcohol
consumption remained statistically unchanged. This
reduction in binge drinking prevalence is primarily
attributed to social distancing measures. Notably, none of
the stressors related to COVID-19 were found to correlate
with either the prevalence or the severity of binge drinking
episodes. In contrast, increased alcohol consumption was
associated with distance learning, pre-existing binge
drinking behaviors prior to the pandemic, and the use of
substances as coping mechanisms. Furthermore, binge
drinking was not associated with resilient coping strategies.
8/11
Gohari et al.,
2023
Canada
[28]
Three cohorts: T1
(2018/19), T2 (2019/20),
and T3 (2020/21).
In T2, data collection was
conducted pre-pandemic
(from September 2019 to
February 2020, T2a) and
post-pandemic (from
May to June 2020, T2b),
To investigate changes in
alcohol consumption
patterns among youth
subpopulations during the
pandemic. It focuses on
analyzing drinking
behavior profiles within
this demographic and
assessing the pandemic’s
impact by comparing
transitions between
different subgroups before
and after the pandemic.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Using data from an ongoing
prospective cohort study
(n= 5347) in Canadian
college students:
T2a (n= 3447; 57.3%
women; aged 12–18);
T2b (n= 1900; 65.2%
women; aged 12–18).
This study examines the
prevalence of binge drinking
through participants’ self-reported
instances of consuming five or
more alcoholic beverages in a
single occasion over the past year.
Participants were classified into
four categories: non-binge
drinkers, occasional binge drinkers,
monthly binge drinkers, and
weekly binge drinkers. To identify
distinct patterns of alcohol
consumption and analyze
temporal transitions between these
patterns, latent transition analysis
(LTA) was employed, utilizing both
overall drinking frequency and
binge drinking frequency as
primary variables.
Individuals were classified as occasional, monthly, or
weekly binge drinkers. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the
probability of binge drinking among occasional drinkers
was 61%, which decreased to 43% during the early
pandemic period. A minor fraction of occasional binge
drinkers shifted to more frequent patterns (monthly or
weekly), with female occasional drinkers showing a higher
likelihood of this transition compared to males. Cohort T2b
reported slightly higher binge drinking levels than Cohort
T2a, with T2b’s occasional drinkers increasing from 7% to
10%, while in T2a, it rose from 8% to 16%. For Cohort T2a,
the probability of maintaining occasional binge drinking
was 37%, with transitions to monthly and weekly binge
drinking at 22% and 2%, respectively. Overall, the
pandemic’s impact on transitions between different alcohol
consumption patterns was not statistically significant.
10/11
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 9 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Gohari et al.,
2022
Canada
[29]
Four cohorts: T1
(2017/18); T2 (2018/19);
T3 (2019/20); T4
(2020/21).
To analyze variations in
alcohol consumption across
two phases of the
pandemic.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Longitudinal data
(n= 14,089) students;
age range: 13–18 years;
52.9–63.1% women along
the study.
(COMPASS) study (2012–2027).
The frequency of binge drinking:
“In the last 12 months, how often
did you have 5 drinks of alcohol or
more on one occasion?”.
Prevalence of BD was compared on
T1 and T2 versus T3 and T4.
A D-I-D model was used to
compare changes in the frequency
BD between the pre-COVID-19
period to the initial- and
ongoing-pandemic periods.
The anticipated increase in binge drinking (BD) frequency
from the pre-pandemic period (2018/19) to the initial phase
of the COVID-19 pandemic (2019/20) was less pronounced
than the changes observed between the 2017/18 and
2018/19 periods across different sex and age groups.
However, during the second year of the pandemic, both
overall alcohol consumption and binge drinking frequency
increased. In the T2/T3 period, male students exhibited a
greater decline in BD compared to their female
counterparts. Additionally, male students and younger
adolescents (aged 12–14) showed a disproportionate
increase in alcohol consumption in T3.
10/11
Gohari et al.,
2023
Canada
[30]
T1 (2018/19); T2 (May to
June 2020); T3 (2020/21).
To study changing patterns
of alcohol consumption
over the pandemic and
associations with
depression and anxiety
symptoms among
adolescents.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Longitudinal data
“COMPASS” (n= 1901)
students;
age range: 13–18 years;
65.3% women and 34.7%
men.
Alcohol consumption national
surveillance. BD: “In the last
12 months, how often did you have
5 drinks of alcohol or more on one
occasion?”.
CESD-R-10 and GAD-7.
Multilevel logistic regression
models were utilized to assess the
association between symptoms of
depression and anxiety with the
likelihood of alcohol consumption.
Symptoms of depression and anxiety exhibited a significant
increase over the three-year period, with these changes
being influenced by variations in binge drinking (BD).
Students with increased depression were more likely to
initiate BD before and during the pandemic. Students who
initiated BD in T2 reported the greatest increase in
depression and anxiety.
The proportion of females maintaining, initiating or
escalating BD was higher than males, while higher
proportions of males reported abstaining from BD than
females from T1 to T3. Rates of reduced consumption were
similar among males and females from T1 to T2 and T2 to
T3.
10/11
Hoots et al.,
2023
USA
[31]
2009–2021
To examine substance use
patterns and understand
how substance use among
high school students
changed before and during
the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Year 2019: n= 13,677
respondents; Year 2021:
n= 17,232 respondents;
age range: 14–18 years;
48.1% women; 51.9% men.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:
prevalences among high school
students of current (i.e., previous
30 days) BD.
From 2019 to 2021, the prevalence of BD decreased. Current
binge drinking was reported by 10.5% of the sample in 2021.
Compared with males, females had a higher prevalence of
binge drinking (12.2% versus 9.0%). Males also had a 30%
relative decrease in binge drinking from 2019 to 2021.
6/8
Kinouani et al.,
2024
France
[32]
April to May 2020
To compare self-reported
changes in alcohol misuse
during the first COVID-19
lockdown between French
students and non-students
and describe factors
associated with alcohol
misuse in each subgroup.
Cross-sectional
study
The Confins cohort: n= 900;
age range: 18–25 years;
median age: 24.3 years;
74.3% women, 25.7% men.
BD frequency: “If you drink six
drinks of alcohol on one occasion
and in a short time, has it happened
more frequently since lockdown?”.
AUDIT-C, GAD-7, and PHQ-9.
Multiple logistic regression was
performed to estimate the
association between self-reported
BD and the variables.
Nine hundred people had BD in the last 7 days, and
students reported more suicidal thoughts, high PHQ-9, and
GAD-7 scores than non-students.
Decrease or no change in BD was more common than an
increase.
The risk factors explaining an increase in binge drinking
frequency were being a tobacco smoker before lockdown
and not practicing any physical activity during the last
7 days.
7/8
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 10 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Mallis et al.,
2022
USA
[33]
October–December 2020
To identify risk factors
(demographic and
behavioral) associated with
SARS-CoV-2 infection
among college students.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of n= 679 university
students; age range: 20–21
(29%);
78.6% women; 21.4% men.
BD: high, low, or never (five or
more alcoholic beverages in a
two-hour period (men) and 4 or
more in a two-hour period
(women).
Demographics and academic
characteristics, students’ health
habits, smoking, alcohol
consumption, exercise intensity
and duration, and COVID-related
questions.
Prevalence ratios were calculated.
The majority of individuals reported some binge drinking
behavior: 125 participants (18.4%) in the high frequency
category and 317 (46.7%) in the low frequency category.
SARS-CoV-2 infection was 2.8 times more likely among
those who reported a high frequency of BD.
5/8
Miech et al.,
2021
USA
[34]
February–March 2020
and July–August 2020
To assess if substantial
reduction in drug
availability will lead to
reductions in drug
prevalence.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of n= 582 12th
grade college students;
age range: +18 years;
50% women; 50% men.
BD in the past two weeks: “Think
back over the LAST TWO WEEKS.
How many times have you had five
or more drinks in a row? (A “drink”
is a bottle of beer, a glass of wine, a
wine cooler, a shot glass of liquor, a
mixed drink, etc.)”.
Multivariable regressions were
performed.
Perceived availability of alcohol declined across the two
survey waves. Despite these declines, prevalence BD levels
did not significantly change. Changes in binge drinking
prevalence across the two survey waves differed across the
social distancing groups.
5/8
Monzon et al.,
2024
Guatemala
[35]
May to September 2019
(Wave 1); June to
November 2020 (Wave 2).
To assess whether the
COVID-19 school
shutdown influenced
adolescent alcohol
(including binge drinking)
use.
Cross-sectional
study
Wave 1 (n= 20,969); Wave 2
(n= 1606). Sample of high
school students in
Guatemala City.
Age range: 13–>15;
51.8% women; 48.2% men.
BD: “Have you ever had about 4 or
more drinks on one occasion over
the prior 30 days?”.
Logistic Generalized Estimating
Equations to estimate the influence
of the COVID-19 lockdown on BD.
Prevalence declined for binge drinking (24% to 13%;
p< 0.001
). Friends’ and household members’ substance use
was significantly associated with teenagers’ substance use,
and they all significantly decreased in Wave 2.
5/8
Niedzwiedz
et al., 2020
United
Kingdom
[17]
Data from 2015 to 2019,
compared to data of the
COVID-19 pandemic
onset (April 2020)
To investigate the impact of
the UK’s COVID-19
lockdown on mental health
and health behaviours, as
well as whether any
observed impacts differed
by age, gender, ethnicity,
and education level.
Longitudinal study,
based on various
cross-sectional
analysis by waves.
Longitudinal analysis
composed by (n= 9748)
adults, of whom n= 655
were aged 18–24 years;
52.0% women; 48% men.
GHQ-12 and AUDIT-C. BD: 6+
drinks in a single sitting on a
weekly basis.
Prevalence estimates (with 95%
CIs) for each outcome were
calculated. Multi-level Poisson
regression was used.
Psychological distress increased into lockdown with the
prevalence rising from 19.4% to 30.6% in April 2020. BD
increased from 10.8% in 2017–2019 to 16.2% during the
lockdown. The proportion of people drinking four or more
times per week increased, as did binge drinking (RR = 1.5;
95% CI: 1.3 to 1.7). Relative risk for BD was significant for
women aged 18–24 in comparison to pre-pandemic data.
9/11
Patin et al., 2022
France
[36]May 2020 and May 2021
To assess the progression of
healthy behaviors from the
pre-COVID-19 period to
May 2021.
Retrospective online
cross-sectional
study.
Sample of (n= 6991)
university students;
mean age: 20.8 (SD = 2.5);
73.4% of women; 26.6%
men.
BD in the past week was defined as
the consumption of six or more
glasses of alcohol on a single
occasion. The frequency of BD was
classified into three categories:
never, occasional, and regular.
CES-D8, socio-demographic, and
COVID-19-related questions.
A multivariate logistic regression
model was used.
BD (both occasional and regular) declined in 2020 and 2021
compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. However, a notable
increase was observed in May 2021, approaching
pre-pandemic levels. This resurgence may be attributed to
the relaxation of restrictions, including curfews and partial
lockdowns, which allowed for small social gatherings.
6/8
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 11 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Patrick et al.,
2022
USA
[37]
April to November 2020
To examine drinking trends
(prevalence, frequency,
contexts, and reasons) prior
to and during the
COVID-19 pandemic in
2020 and whether they
differed by age and college
status.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Data from the MTF study
(
n= 29,940
) college students.
Aged: 18–30 years, with
57.0% from 18 to 24 years;
53.1% women; 46.9% men.
BD: “Think back over the last two
weeks. How many times have you
had five or more drinks in a row?”
Alcohol prevalence and frequency
data were obtained through MTF
survey.
Sensitivity analyses were
conducted and full multivariable
models including covariates were
run.
Prevalence of young adult BD was generally stable from
2015 to 2019 (29.5–31.1%), but 2020 was associated with
downward deviation (26.4%) in BD prevalence (young
adults). In addition, there was an upward non-significant
deviation in BD among drinkers aged 19–30. Among the
factors, it was prevalent to drink alone and at
home/apartment/dorm, to relax/relieve tension and
because of boredom.
8/11
Pelham et al.,
2022
USA
[38]
June 2020, December
2020, and June 2021
To examine the impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on
drinking and nicotine use
through June of 2021 in a
community-based sample
of young adults
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of n= 348
individuals;
age range: 18–22 years;
mean age: 20 years;
49% women; 51% men.
BD: the number of days in the past
30 days during which individuals
consumed
5 alcoholic drinks (
4
for females) on an occasion.
There were no statistically significant differences between
the pre-pandemic and during-pandemic time points for BD.
However, a non-significant reduction was observed in BD
in June and December 2020. The pandemic impact on
participants’ financial economy did not moderate drinking
outcomes.
7/11
Rogés et al.,
2021
Spain
[39]
October 2019 to February
2020 and June to July
2020.
To identify the changes in
binge drinking, the
hazardous drinking, the
hazardous consumption of
cannabis, and the daily
smoking of tobacco, in a
cohort of 14- to 18-year-old
adolescents, due to the
COVID-19 pandemic
confinement.
Longitudinal cohort
study
DESK-COVID-Cohort
Wave 2 (n= 303);
age range: 14–18;
29.7% men and 70.3%
women.
BD: “How often do you have 6
alcoholic drinks on a single
occasion?”. AUDIT-Ctest. CAST.
DESK-COVID-Cohort survey.
Cumulative Incidence of Change
(IC) and the relative risks (RR) were
obtained.
There were 36.3% of participants who consumed alcohol in
a binge drinking pattern. Older adolescents attending
advanced vocational courses had a significantly (p< 0.05)
higher risk of binge drinking (RR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.00–10.34).
The overall prevalence of BD decreased from the
pre-COVID period (36.3%) to after confinement (5.9%)
(p< 0.05).
The likelihood of BD (RR = 1.46; 95% CI:0.49–4.33) was
higher among students with medium and high economic
incomes.
9/11
Romano et al.,
2022
Canada
[40]
May–July 2020
To examine how substance
use is associated with
perceptions of and
adherence to early
COVID-19-related public
health measures.
Cross-sectional
study
Data of a sample (n= 7876)
in a prospective cohort of
Canadian adolescents;
age range: 12–19 years;
mean age: 15
(SD = 1.6 years);
60% women; 36% men.
COMPASS Student Questionnaire.
Participation in BD in the past 12
months; current BD was defined as
5 or more drinks on one occasion at
least once per month.
Two models were used to estimate
how substance use was associated
with perceptions and adherence to
early COVID-19 restrictions.
There were 11.4% (n= 895) of students who reported
current binge drinking. Binge drinking was associated with
perceptions that restrictions were too strict and with
nonadherence, reporting that they did not take COVID-19
restrictions seriously compared to those who did not drink.
7/8
Rubio et al.,
2023
Netherlands
[41]
April–July 2020
To examine the impact of
the initial lockdown on
alcohol consumption
among university students
who engaged in regular
binge drinking prior to its
implementation.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 7355)
university students;
mean age: 21.4
(SD = 2.3 years);
60.8% women, 39.2% men.
Participants were categorized as
either frequent binge drinkers or
regular drinkers according to the
response to the specified question:
“How often did you drink 6
servings or more on a single
occasion before the COVID-19
outbreak?”
CES-D8, BRS.
Out of 2065 surveyed students, 35.7% were identified as
binge drinkers. During the lockdown period, a majority of
regular binge drinkers (70.1%) demonstrated a notable
decrease in BD frequency, with a reduction from 12.8% to
7.6%. Factors contributing to increased or sustained alcohol
consumption among binge drinkers included older age, a
lower baseline alcohol intake prior to the COVID-19
pandemic, greater social interactions, and living
independently rather than with parents. Additionally,
among regular binge drinkers, males exhibited a
significantly greater increase in alcohol consumption
compared to females. Furthermore, individuals with
pronounced depressive symptoms and lower resilience
levels were more likely to increase their alcohol use.
8/8
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 12 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Serkut Bulut
et al., 2021
Turkey
[42]
May–June 2020
To explore the relationship
between students’ social
support systems,
health-risk behaviors, and
mental/academic
well-being of
higher-education students
in ˙
Istanbul during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 2583)
higher-education students;
mean age = 22.84
(SD = 4.79 years);
65.5% women; 34.5% men.
COVID-19 International Student
Well-Being Study.
CES-D-8, UCLA-3 Loneliness Scale,
Academic Stress Scale, and
Academic Satisfaction Scale.
Bivariate associations and a binary
logistic regression test were
conducted.
BD frequency significantly decreased during COVID-19.
The frequency of BD was associated with depressive
symptoms, loneliness, increased levels of academic stress,
and lower academic satisfaction. An accessible and
supportive social network was found to be a protective
factor against depression. Women and men were almost
never binge drinkers before or during COVID-19. During
the pandemic, BD was significantly higher among male
students compared to females.
6/8
Shapiro et al.,
2022
Israel
[43]
April–September 2020
To examine the prevalence
of risky behaviors among
adolescents in Israel during
the COVID-19 pandemic
and assess the potential
impact of the pandemic on
the occurrence of these
behaviors.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 1020)
adolescents;
age range: 15–18 years;
mean age = 16.73
(SD = 0.99 years);
57.3% women; 42.7% men.
BD: “In the past 30 days, how many
times have you drank five drinks of
alcohol or more within a period of a
few hours?”.
HBSC survey, FAS, and MSPSS.
Binary logistic regression models
were used.
In the studied population, BD emerged as the most
common risky behavior, reported by 33.8% of participants.
A significant correlation was observed between BD and
broader patterns of risky behavior, including tobacco use
and cannabis consumption. During the pandemic, the
majority of respondents (55.2%) exhibited no change in the
frequency of their drinking behavior. Conversely, 14.4%
reported initiating or increasing their BD frequency, while
15.9% noted a decrease in alcohol consumption. Factors,
such as low family support, high socioeconomic status,
advanced age, male gender, and elevated emotional
distress, were identified as predictors of BD. Notably,
support from friends, levels of physical activity, and
COVID-19-related restrictions did not significantly
influence binge drinking behavior.
7/8
Sharma et al.,
2022
USA
[44]
April 2020–March 2021
To study the associations
between demographic
factors, psychological
distress, and changes in
alcohol use before and after
the onset of COVID-19 in
adolescents and young
adults.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of (n= 2216)
individuals;
age range: 16–20 years, with
40.7% from 16 to 18 years;
81% women and 19% men.
Risk of increased alcohol
consumption: binge drinking
(never, less than monthly, monthly,
weekly, or daily), number of drinks,
and drinking regularity.
PHQ-9 and GAD-7.
Logistic regression models were
used.
No changes in BD were reported by 74.6% of the sample,
and 17.0% reported an increase in BD. Older age, college
students, increased anxiety, and smoking status showed
significant associations during the pandemic.
8/11
Sylvestre et al.,
2022
Canada
[45]
December 2020–June
2021
To assess changes in
substance use among young
adults before and during
the COVID-19 pandemic,
with a focus on identifying
factors that contribute to the
initiation or increase of
substance use during this
time.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Longitudinal investigation
of (n= 1294) youth from
1999 to 2021; a sample of
(n= 704) was obtained
during the pandemic.
Mean age: 33.6
(SD = 0.6 years);
58.2% women; 41.8% men.
BD: consuming 5 alcoholic
beverages on one occasion.
Data on the utilization of cannabis,
alcohol, combustible cigarettes,
e-cigarettes, and binge drinking
prior to the pandemic were
gathered.
Modified Poisson regression was
used.
Amid the pandemic, 7.9% of respondents reported weekly
occurrences of binge drinking, and 12% reported daily
occurrences. The rate of individuals who either
discontinued or diminished their binge drinking behavior
was significantly higher during this period, at 53.5%,
particularly among those aged between 24.0 and 30.6 years.
Additionally, low socioeconomic status, mental health
conditions, and solitary living arrangements were
associated with an elevated likelihood of engaging in
weekly or daily binge drinking.
7/11
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 13 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Tavolacci et al.,
2021
France
[46]
March–May 2020
To assess the modifications
in health-related behaviors
among students enrolled at
a university in France
throughout the COVID-19
lockdown
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 3671)
university students;
mean age: 20.9
(SD = 2.47 years);
72.9% women; 27.1% men.
BD is operationally defined as the
consumption of six or more
alcoholic beverages in one sitting,
with frequency classified into four
categories: never, occasional,
weekly, and daily.
CESD-8, academic, and
COVID-related data. A
multivariable logistic regression
model was used.
The data revealed a significant decrease in binge drinking
prevalence from 35.9% before the COVID-19 pandemic to
9.3% during the pandemic. Only 3.1% of participants
reported an increase, predominantly among male students
who had never lived with their parents and had higher
CESD-8 scores. Factors linked to the reduction in binge
drinking included enrolment in healthcare programs, being
in the second year or beyond of their studies, returning to
live with parents, living alone during the pandemic,
awareness of local COVID-19 cases, and concerns about
severe health risks from the virus.
7/8
Tholen et al.,
2022
Belgium
[47]
April–May 2020
To examine associations
between pandemic-related
stressors, psychosocial
distress, and self-reported
alcohol, tobacco, and
cannabis use before and
during the first wave of the
pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 18,346)
higher education students;
age range: 17 to 24;
75% women and 25% men.
BD is defined as the consumption
of six or more alcoholic beverages
during a single event.
To analyze the data, multinomial
logistic regression techniques were
employed.
A total of 2289 (12.5%) students declared the use of BD
during
COVID-19. A total of N = 7335 students declared
themselves as no binge drinkers. BD decreased during the
pandemic (87.4%) due to limited social gatherings and low
economic status. Returning to the parental home is linked
to reduced BD, whereas depressive symptoms and
psychosocial distress are associated with increased BD.
Perceived threat and academic stress were also associated
with increased BD.
7/8
Vallentin-
Holbech et al.,
2023
Denmark
[48]
August 2020 and
November 2020
To investigate the changes
in hazardous alcohol
consumption, social
interactions, and overall
well-being among first-year
Danish students during the
second wave of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 352) Danish
students in secondary
school;
age range: 15–20 years;
mean age: 16.8
(SD = 0.74 years);
66.8% women and 33.2%
men.
BD: the number of days.
Alcohol use was measured using
the Timeline Follow-back;
alcohol-related negative
consequences were assessed using
the RAPI23.
COVID-19 variables were
measured using the PHQ-4.
Multilevel regression models were
used.
During COVID-19-pandemic, students decreased the
frequency and quantity of binge drinking reduced from a
mean of 2.35 ±2.35 days a month to 1.46 ±2.59 days.
Decrease in BD was associated with attending fewer parties.
Variations in mental health and experiences of loneliness
did not correlate with a reduction in hazardous alcohol use.
6/8
van Hooijdonk
et al., 2022
Netherland
[49]
April–June 2020
To examine the influence of
COVID-19 on trends in
weekly smoking, binge
drinking, and cannabis use
among Dutch university
students, as well as
associated characteristics
related to the pandemic.
Cross-sectional
study
Sample of (n= 9967)
university students;
mean age: 22.0
(SD = 2.6 years);
70.3% women and 29.7%
men.
BD before and during COVID-19:
drinking 6 glasses on a single
occasion.
Multivariate logistic regression
analyses were used.
The prevalence of weekly binge drinking was higher
among males than females both before and during the
initial COVID-19 lockdown. A study of 6884 students
indicated a significant decline in weekly binge drinking
from 27.8% to 13.9% during the pandemic. Among those
who did not binge drink prior to COVID-19, 6.2% reported
an increase in such behavior. Key factors associated with
increased risk included being male, not living with parents,
being an undergraduate student, having limited financial
resources, and lower adherence to COVID-19 safety
measures. Older age was linked to a reduced likelihood of
binge drinking before the pandemic but a higher likelihood
during it. Complicated relationship status also raised the
probability of binge drinking during COVID-19, whereas
strict adherence to safety measures correlated with lower
binge drinking rates.
6/8
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 14 of 25
Table 2. Cont.
Reference and
Context Data Collection Objective of the Study Type of Study Participants Methods Main Findings Quality of
Studies
Vasconcelos
et al., 2021
Portugal
[50]
April–May 2020;
October–November 2020.
To examine the impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on
college students’ alcohol
consumption habits by
evaluating how personal
characteristics, emotional
states, lifestyle choices, and
social context influenced
their alcohol use and binge
drinking behaviors.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of 146 college
students; mean age: 19.5
(SD = 1.5 years); age range:
17–26 years;
81% women and 19% men.
Regular binge drinkers, defined as
individuals who consume five or
more alcoholic beverages on a
single occasion at least once a
month, as well as infrequent binge
drinkers and non-binge drinkers.
AUDIT, PACS, and DASS-21.
Linear regressions were
implemented. Linear mixed-effects
models were estimated.
The alcohol consumption of regular binge drinkers (BDs)
significantly decreased from the pre-lockdown period
(M = 10.9) to the lockdown period (M = 4.8; p< 0.001) and
further declined post-lockdown (M = 2.2; p< 0.001).
Regular BDs maintained lower alcohol intake than usual
even after the cessation of isolation restrictions. During the
lockdown, significant differences in weekly binge drinking
were observed only between the non-binge drinkers and
regular binge drinkers. No significant interactions were
found between stress, anxiety, depression, and drinking
group that could explain variations in alcohol consumption.
Factors positively correlated with increased alcohol intake
during the lockdown included a history of drunkenness,
heightened cravings, and cohabiting with friends. The
COVID-19 mitigation measures and social distancing likely
disrupted the typical social contexts that facilitate binge
drinking.
10/11
Zysset et al.,
2022
Switzerland
[51]
April 2020–June 2021
To examine increase in
alcohol consumption, single
and multiple binge
drinking, and associated
factors in students during
the lockdown and
post-lockdown periods.
Longitudinal cohort
study
Sample of n= 947 university
students;
mean age: 27.0
(SD = 6.5 years);
75.8% women and 24.2%
men.
BD: any binge drinking in the past
30 days (5 drinks on one or more
occasion); “Think back again over
the last 30 days. How many times
(if any) have you had five or more
drinks on one occasion?”.
GAD-7, ASKU, BRCS, and Oslo-3
Social Support Scale.
Generalized Estimating Equations
models were used.
There were 26% of the students who engaged in BD during
the pandemic. Higher anxiety scores were associated to
binge drinking. Additional factors associated with BD were
male gender, younger age, higher perceived social support,
and not living with parents. University students who
consumed more alcoholic drinks at baseline were more
likely to report at least one binge drinking event in the past
30 days. BD was not associated with lower resilience or
self-efficacy.
9/11
Table legend: ASKU: General Self-Efficacy Expectations Short Scale; AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test; BD: binge drinking; BRCS: Brief Resilient Coping Scale; BRS: Brief
Resilience Scale; CAST: Cannabis Abuse Screening Test; CES-D8: Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CESD-R-10: 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression
Scale Revised Scale; DASS-21: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21; D-I-D: difference-in-difference; FAS: Family Affluence Scale; GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale;
HBSC: Health Behavior in School-Aged Children; HRB: Health Risk Behaviors; IC: Cumulative Incidence of Change; MSPSS: Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; MTF:
Monitoring the Future; PACS: Penn Alcohol Craving Scale; PHQ-4: Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety 4 items; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items;
RAPI23: Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index 23 items; RR: relative risk; SDBQ-L: Short Diet Behavior Questionnaire for Lockdowns; UCLA-3: University of California, Los Angeles-3 item
Loneliness Scale.
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 15 of 25
3.2. Risk of Bias in Studies
The included studies met the minimum threshold according to the JBI critical appraisal
tools, achieving a rating of moderate to high quality. For cross-sectional studies, the obtained
scores were 5/8 [
33
35
], 6/8 [
19
,
23
,
24
,
31
,
36
,
42
,
48
,
49
], 7/8 [
25
,
26
,
32
,
40
,
43
,
46
,
47
], and 8/8 [
41
]. For
cohort or longitudinal studies, the scores were 7/11 [
38
,
45
], 8/11 [
18
,
27
,
37
,
44
], 9/11 [
16
,
17
,
39
,
51
],
and 10/11 [2830,50].
3.3. Results of Individual Studies
Longitudinal research provided more significant insights into the evolution of BD
over time and the causal relationships between various factors and behaviors. These
studies revealed fluctuations in BD patterns throughout different phases of the pandemic,
highlighting consistent trends and identifying protective or risk factors. Notable findings
included an initial decrease in BD, primarily associated with reduced social opportunities
due to lockdowns and restrictions, followed by a resurgence in the second year of the
pandemic, particularly among men [
29
] and older adolescents, linked to feelings of bore-
dom [
27
,
37
], loneliness, and depression [
28
]. The longitudinal studies identified several
consistent predictors of BD, including psychosocial factors such as depression [28,30] and
anxiety [
17
,
28
,
30
,
44
,
45
,
51
]; a lack of coping strategies and low academic engagement [
18
];
prior excessive alcohol consumption as a significant risk factor [
45
]; and insufficient so-
cial and familial support [
16
,
37
,
45
,
50
,
51
], which contributed to the increase in BD. These
findings emphasize the intricate interplay between social conditions [44,50].
Considering both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, several factors associated with
the COVID-19 pandemic have been identified as contributing to an increase in BD. These include
the direct effects of COVID-19 infection [
33
], experiences of isolation [
19
,
23
], disconnection from
social environments [
19
,
23
,
34
], loneliness [
23
,
42
], stress related to COVID-19 [
37
,
43
,
47
], social
restrictions resulting from the pandemic [
40
], and non-compliance with these restrictions
[40,49]
.
Several factors contributing to the increase in BD associated with psychosocial health include:
lack of coping strategies [
18
,
19
], depressive symptoms [
26
,
30
,
32
,
41
,
42
,
46
,
47
], anxiety symp-
toms [
30
,
32
,
44
,
50
,
51
], boredom [
26
,
27
,
37
], risk of suicide [
32
], low resilience [
41
], and having a
previous mental health diagnosis [45].
Various factors can be identified that connect BD to other health-related behaviors.
These include a lifetime of regular smoking [
23
,
32
,
43
,
44
], binge drinking prior to the
pandemic [
18
,
41
,
50
,
51
], lack of physical activity [
32
], using substances (i.e., cannabis) [
18
,
43
],
and other risk behaviors [43].
The sociodemographic variables contributing to various outcomes include educational
attainment such as primary or middle school education [
25
,
44
], vocational training [
39
], and
bachelor studies [
49
]. Additionally, economic status plays a significant role, encompassing both
low [
25
,
45
,
49
] and high economic status [
39
,
43
]. Social living arrangements, whether living alone,
with a partner, or with friends, are also relevant factors [
25
,
35
,
37
,
41
,
45
,
46
,
49
51
]. Furthermore,
involvement in Greek life and the presence of friends or social groups [
19
,
35
,
36
,
41
,
51
], and being
in a complicated relationship [
26
,
49
] are determinants. Other notable influences include low
family support [
43
], limited recreational activities [
27
], and the impact of distance learning and
academic disengagement [18,42,47].
Numerous studies have indicated a correlation between female gender and an in-
creased risk of BD during the COVID-19 pandemic [
17
,
28
,
31
]. Conversely, other research
has identified male gender as a contributing factor to the risk [
29
,
41
,
43
,
46
,
49
,
51
]. Addition-
ally, both younger [
29
,
51
] and older adolescents [
39
,
41
,
43
,
44
,
49
] have been associated with
heightened levels of BD. Furthermore, the second year of the pandemic was related to an
increase in BD compared to the year 2020 [29].
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 16 of 25
Several factors associated with COVID-19 have been linked to a reduction in BD.
These include confinement measures and the implementation of initial stay-at-home
orders [
16
,
24
,
48
50
]. Additionally, social distancing practices played a role in this de-
crease [
18
,
46
,
47
,
50
]. The presence of supportive relationships during this period [
19
,
42
]
also contributed positively. Furthermore, the anxiety surrounding potential infection and
the risk of transmitting the virus to others was a significant factor [
46
]. Resilient coping
strategies were found to correlate with a decline in BD [
18
]. Moreover, individuals who
did not have a history of alcohol consumption were also observed to have a lower risk of
experiencing BD [28].
A reduction in BD has been associated with several sociodemographic factors, includ-
ing residing with family members [
25
,
46
] and being enrolled as a student [
28
,
46
], with a
particular emphasis on those studying health sciences [
46
]. Additionally, individuals from
lower economic backgrounds have also been linked to a decrease in BD [47].
Conversely, the factors of being female [
26
,
27
,
42
] and younger [
26
28
] appeared
to mitigate the incidence of BD, whereas [
45
] reported a decreased risk of BD among
older individuals.
Additionally, various studies have identified certain variables that did not correlate
with fluctuations in BD, including pandemic-related stress and social support [
25
,
48
],
smoking and cannabis use [
26
], pandemic-related stressors [
18
,
28
,
43
], low economy [
38
],
physical activity [
43
], support from friends [
43
], as well as low resilience and low self-
efficacy [51].
4. Discussion
This systematic review highlights a range of risk factors that contribute to the preva-
lence of the BD behavior. Evidence suggests that BD may be linked to various underlying
causes, including the impact of COVID-19 restrictions, mental and behavioral health disor-
ders, familial difficulties, and socioeconomic challenges.
Numerous factors linked to the pandemic have emerged as significant influences,
including COVID-19 infection [
33
], experiences of isolation [
2
,
19
], social disconnec-
tion [
19
,
23
,
34
], feelings loneliness [
3
,
42
], stress stemming from the health crisis, social
restrictions [
37
,
43
,
47
], and instances of non-compliance with pandemic restrictions [
40
,
49
].
Furthermore, the second year of the pandemic saw a rise in BD compared to 2020 [29].
Several factors contribute to a low psychosocial health, including insufficient coping
mechanisms [
18
,
19
], depressive symptoms [
26
,
30
,
32
,
41
,
42
,
46
,
47
], anxiety [
30
,
32
,
44
,
50
,
51
],
feelings of boredom [
26
,
27
,
37
], suicide risk [
32
], low resilience [
41
], and pre-existing mental
health conditions [
45
]. Research suggests that neuroticism, boredom proneness, and type
D personality—characterized by a heightened sensitivity to negative emotions and a
tendency to suppress emotional expression in social contexts—may serve as inefficient
strategies for dealing with emotional problems [
52
]. Additionally, another study identifies
BD as a potential strategy to mitigate depressive or anxious moods which can create a
bidirectional cycle where excessive alcohol consumption and emotional distress reinforce
each other [
53
]. In relation to mental health, social behavior disorders or ADHD issues
may also correlate with BD [
54
]. Sensation-seeking behavior, along with low self-control
and impulsivity—traits more commonly observed in adolescents and males—can lead to
difficulties in resisting urges, such as the consumption of alcohol [
52
]. Moreover, BD is
significantly associated with an increased risk of suicide and suicide attempts [
54
] and has
been connected to the onset of anxiety and depression [55].
Various additional habits, including habitual smoking [
23
,
32
,
43
,
44
], high levels of
alcohol intake before the onset of the pandemic [
18
,
41
,
50
,
51
], lack of physical activity [
32
],
substance use (such as cannabis), and other risky behaviors [
18
,
43
], were also identified as
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 17 of 25
contributing factors for BD. Research has indicated a correlation between self-identifying
as a social smoker and instances of BD [
56
]. Similarly, cannabis consumption appears
to exacerbate this association, particularly among college students and undergraduates.
Furthermore, binge drinkers who also use cannabis exhibit diminished neuropsychological
performance, notably characterized by deficits in episodic memory [5759].
Sociodemographic factors contributing to the phenomenon include educational attain-
ment (such as middle school, bachelor’s degrees, and vocational training) [
25
,
39
,
44
,
49
], low
socioeconomic status [
25
,
45
,
49
], and, conversely, high socioeconomic status [
39
,
43
]. Addi-
tional factors encompass living alone [
25
,
35
,
37
,
41
,
45
,
46
,
49
51
], limited familial support [
43
],
a lack of engaging activities [27], the prevalence of distance learning, and academic disen-
gagement [
18
,
42
,
47
]. The correlation with extraversion, potentially linked to peer influence,
underscores the considerable impact of the social context on BD [
52
,
60
]. Consequently, it is
significant to note how both feelings of loneliness and social isolation have variably affected
BD during the pandemic. Specifically, these factors have led to an increased prevalence
of BD among individuals exhibiting depressive or anxious tendencies, as well as those
experiencing heightened loneliness. Conversely, a general trend observed across studies
indicates a substantial reduction in BD, attributed to diminished social interactions and
fewer opportunities for alcohol consumption. Other relevant variables include family
dysfunction [
60
], parental drinking behaviors [
53
], and living independently from one’s
family [
61
], all of which were associated with BD prior to the onset of the COVID-19
pandemic. Furthermore, relatively high income [
62
,
63
] or the availability of disposable
income, which facilitates access to alcohol, particularly among university students during
weekends, has also been linked to BD [60].
Our research outlines various factors associated with a decrease of BD in the con-
text of COVID-19. Pandemic-related factors include confinement and stay-at-home or-
ders [
16
,
24
,
48
50
], social distancing [
18
,
46
,
47
,
50
], fear of contagion [
46
], and resilient coping
strategies [
18
]. Feeling supported by loved ones [
19
,
42
] and not having been a prior alcohol
consumer [28] are also linked to lower levels of BD.
In terms of sociodemographic factors, living with family [
25
,
46
], being a student
(particularly in health sciences) [
28
,
46
], or having a low economic status are associated
with reduced BD levels [
47
]. Furthermore, it has been observed that the risk of BD tends to
decline among older adolescents [
45
]. Factors such as religiosity [
60
,
63
], social support from
family and friends [
63
], and parental control [
53
,
60
,
61
] have been identified as protective
factors for BD before the pandemic, and thus, these factors remained active from 2020
onwards.
Numerous studies have examined the influence of sociodemographic factors, par-
ticularly sex, on the prevalence of BD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some research
indicates that being female is associated with a heightened risk of BD during this pe-
riod [
17
,
28
,
31
]. Conversely, other studies suggest that being male may correlate with an
increased risk [
29
,
41
,
43
,
46
,
49
,
51
]. This finding aligns with earlier research that identified a
higher prevalence of BD among males compared to females [64].
The variable of age similarly demonstrates a correlation with BD, as both younger [
29
,
51
]
and older adolescents [
39
,
41
,
43
,
44
,
49
] have been associated with this behavior. Individuals
within the 18–29 age range exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting fluctuations in BD—both
increases and decreases—during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that distinct mechanisms
may underlie these divergent trends. Research indicates that the psychological ramifications
of the pandemic may have disproportionately affected young and middle-aged adults in
comparison to older individuals [
65
68
]. Furthermore, studies reveal that adolescents who
initiate regular alcohol consumption priorto the age of 15 are up to four times more susceptible
to developing alcohol dependence than those who start drinking at a later age [
54
]. This finding
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 18 of 25
supports the notion that alcohol consumption tends to increase in both frequency and quantity
as individuals age [69,70].
Longitudinal studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic have provided valu-
able insights into the evolving patterns of BD. A comprehensive analysis indicates that,
while there was a notable decline in BD prevalence during the initial lockdowns, particu-
larly in the first year, a resurgence was observed in the second year of the pandemic [
16
].
The initial reduction in BD was primarily linked to diminished social opportunities [
18
],
which were a consequence of restrictions such as lockdowns and stay-at-home orders [
17
].
Factors including cohabitation with family and a decrease in social interactions were identi-
fied as protective elements [
18
]. However, as restrictions began to relax in the later stages of
the pandemic, an increase in BD patterns was particularly evident among males and older
adolescents [
30
,
51
]. Research has indicated that feelings of boredom [
37
], loneliness [
50
],
and depression [
30
] played significant roles in influencing BD behaviors, with some studies
noting that women experienced higher rates of BD initiation and escalation compared to
men during the pandemic [
30
]. Furthermore, younger individuals and students who had
pre-existing BD habits were more inclined to resume or amplify their BD as restrictions were
lifted [
27
]. Conversely, when examining the interplay of sex and age, being female [
27
,
28
]
appeared to mitigate the risk of BD, although [
45
] noted a reduced risk of BD among older
adolescents during the second year of the pandemic compared to 2020. The variability
observed across different demographic groups and time periods highlights the intricate
relationship between pandemic-related stressors, mental health, and alcohol consumption
behaviors. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted interventions that can
effectively address the fluctuating nature of BD during extended crises.
4.1. Future Approach and Implications
Considering the results, particularly those from longitudinal studies, future measures
aimed at curbing excessive alcohol consumption should take several key factors into
account, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath.
First, psychosocial support is essential [
71
]. Providing mental health support, es-
pecially during periods of isolation or social restrictions, could mitigate the increase in
alcohol consumption associated with depression, anxiety, and boredom. The prolonged
uncertainty and emotional distress caused by the pandemic have intensified these psy-
chological challenges, making it even more crucial to ensure accessible mental health
resources [
72
]. Additionally, promoting resilient coping strategies may help individuals
manage pandemic-related stress without resorting to BD, particularly as people continue
to adapt to post-pandemic societal changes [18,28].
Social support, including peer support, has proven to be an effective resource for
improving mental health during the pandemic. Family support also plays a crucial role,
as living with family has been identified as a protective factor against BD [
63
]. During
lockdowns, the home environment became a central influence on behavior, either reinforc-
ing protective factors or, in some cases, exacerbating stressors. Encouraging participation
in recreational activities could further reduce BD associated with boredom, which was a
major contributor to increased alcohol use during periods of strict confinement and limited
social interaction [73].
Moreover, sex- and age-specific interventions should be developed, given that these
demographic factors influence BD patterns. The pandemic highlighted distinct vulnerabili-
ties among different groups, with studies showing that men and older adolescents were
particularly prone to increased alcohol use during lockdowns [
29
]. Tailoring interventions
to address these specific needs is essential. Additionally, the social environment must be
considered, as peer influence is a significant factor [
16
,
37
,
45
,
50
,
51
]. The shift from in-person
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 19 of 25
to virtual socialization during the pandemic altered drinking behaviors, and interventions
should address both online and offline peer pressures [74].
Another critical aspect is distance education, as challenges related to remote learning
and academic disengagement have been linked to an increase in BD [
18
,
42
,
47
]. The transi-
tion to online education during the pandemic disrupted students’ routines, reduced their
access to structured environments and contributed to feelings of disconnection, all of which
may have powered unhealthy coping mechanisms such as excessive alcohol consumption.
Addressing these educational challenges and fostering engagement in academic activities
can serve as a protective factor [75].
Additionally, early intervention is necessary to prevent alcohol consumption at a
young age, as early alcohol use has been associated with a higher risk of developing
addiction-related problems. The pandemic underscored the importance of early preventive
measures, given that many adolescents experienced increased exposure to alcohol due to
changes in parental supervision and home dynamics during lockdowns. Initiating alcohol
consumption at an early age has been found to be associated with an increased risk of
developing addiction problems. This highlights the importance of directing intervention
and approach efforts towards adolescents; these measures would be implemented in both
primary care and pediatric services, as well as educational institutions [
76
79
] and those
professionals specialized in the prevention of addictive behaviors [80].
A notable association has been identified between BD and attitudes associated with
drunkorexia, as well as the use of cocaine and novel psychoactive substances [
81
83
].
Research indicates that fasting BD and intoxication serve as predictors of drunkorexic be-
haviors [
84
]. Furthermore, the reduction in physical activity during the pandemic may have
exacerbated these behaviors in two significant ways. Individuals might have attempted
to offset the perceived decrease in caloric expenditure by resorting to disordered eating
practices, such as fasting or omitting meals prior to alcohol consumption, which are charac-
teristic of drunkorexia [
82
]. Additionally, BD, which is closely associated with drunkorexia,
may have intensified due to increased emotional stress and boredom experienced in times
of social distancing, as documented in various studies examining alcohol consumption
during the pandemic [26,27,37,43,47,83,85].
Furthermore, the pandemic not only influenced drinking behaviors in the short term
but may also have long-term effects on alcohol consumption patterns. Thus, it is crucial
to recognize that prevention and intervention strategies should adopt a holistic approach,
considering the physical, mental, and social consequences of BD, including the increased
likelihood of alcohol dependence. Despite often being misconceived as a lifestyle choice
tied to university culture, various studies have explored the interplay between food, alcohol,
and physical activity, particularly in young adults [
86
88
]. Nonetheless, results are not
conclusive, and it is necessary to continue with further research to understand whether
binge behaviors (eating or drinking) interaction [
32
]. This way, future research should
invest in time and resources for health promotion from an early age to mitigate the pattern
of BD consumption among young people [
52
]. It has been identified the need to expand
the preventive approaches beyond the individual, leading to healthier habits and a better
quality of life in the short and long term. Implementing environmental measures in places
frequented by young people, such as bars, pubs, and mass events, as well as interventions in
the family, educational, and media environments [
89
], are effective strategies to guarantee
the success of these approaches. Addressing these risks requires a comprehensive approach
that integrates public health policies, mental health initiatives, and community-based
support systems to mitigate the lasting impact of the pandemic on alcohol use behaviors.
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 20 of 25
4.2. Limitations
This study acknowledges variability in the definition of BD across included studies.
This inconsistency may hinder the comparability and synthesis of results, although the
operational definitions of BD were explored in all the included studies to assure the
consistency of the results. In addition, data collection bias is addressed in this study, as
self-reported data from included studies may underestimate actual alcohol consumption
due to social desirability bias or memory inaccuracies. Sampling bias is also acknowledged
as some included studies suffered from small sample sizes, reducing statistical power and
generalizability. Finally, factors such as pandemic-related stress, social support, and self-
efficacy were reported inconsistently across studies, complicating a cohesive understanding
of their role in BD. The cross-sectional design of most studies may have contributed to this
limitation. Not all results obtained in the study hold the same level of significance, and more
relevant conclusions can be drawn from certain factors, depending on the methodology
employed. While cross-sectional studies have provided valuable insights, their ability
to establish causal relationships is limited. For instance, although some cross-sectional
studies reported a higher risk of BD among females during the pandemic, others suggested
the opposite. These discrepancies may arise from variations in study populations or the
inherent limitations of cross-sectional studies in capturing shifting behavioral patterns
during the pandemic.
5. Conclusions
This systematic review included 33 studies, with 19 cross-sectional and 14 longitudi-
nal studies. Findings on BD during the COVID-19 pandemic are clearly unbalanced, as
two studies reported an increase in BD prevalence, while 21 reported a decrease. Factors
contributing to increased BD included pandemic-related stressors like COVID-19 infection,
isolation, loneliness, and non-compliance with social restrictions. Psychosocial factors such
as depression, anxiety, lack of coping strategies, and pre-existing mental health conditions
were significant, as were habits like prior excessive alcohol use, smoking, cannabis con-
sumption, and physical inactivity. Sociodemographic factors like low education, varying
economic status, and limited family support were also linked to BD.
Conversely, some pandemic-related factors were also associated with reduced BD,
including stay-at-home orders, fear of contagion, resilient coping, and feeling supported
by loved ones. Protective factors included living with family, studying health sciences,
and having a low economic status. Variables like pandemic-related stress and self-efficacy
showed inconsistent relationships with BD. These findings underscore the importance of
understanding the ineffective coping strategies that influence BD behaviors during crises
such as the pandemic.
The study concludes that effective prevention and intervention strategies are essential,
focusing on the physical, mental, and social consequences of BD, including the increased
likelihood of alcohol dependence. A holistic approach to BD in healthcare settings is needed,
integrating early detection, risk factor evaluation, and tailored interventions, particularly
for vulnerable groups like adolescents. Training healthcare professionals is crucial for
effectively addressing BD behaviors and implementing preventive measures.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm14051546/s1, Table S1. PRISMA checklist; Table S2. JBI
score for cross-sectional studies; Table S3. JBI score for cohort studies.
Author Contributions: All authors have made substantial intellectual contributions to this work and
meet the criteria for authorship. This manuscript is original, has not been previously published and is
not currently under review by any other journal. Furthermore, it adheres to the ICMJE guidelines for
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 21 of 25
the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly articles in medical journals. All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The original contributions presented in this study are included in the
article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BD binge drinking
COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease 2019
JBI Joanna Briggs Institute
PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
WHO World Health Organization
SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
References
1.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health and Treatment of Substance Use Disorders; World Health
Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
2.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Making the WHO European Region Safer: Developments in Alcohol Control
Policies, 2010–2019; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021.
3. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
4.
Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones. Monografía Alcohol 2024. Consumo y Consecuencias; Ministerio de Sanidad,
Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas: Madrid, Spain, 2024.
5.
Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones. Informe 2023. Alcohol, Tabaco y Drogas Ilegales en España; Ministerio de
Sanidad, Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas: Madrid, Spain, 2023.
6.
Babor, T.F.; Casswell, S.; Graham, K.; Huckle, T.; Livingston, M.; Österberg, E.; Rehm, J.; Room, R.; Rossow, I.; Sornpaisarn, B.
Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2022.
7.
National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Drinking Levels Defined; National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2015.
8. White, A.M.; Tapert, S.; Shukla, S.D. Binge Drinking. Alcohol Res. 2018,39, 1–3. [PubMed]
9.
Patrick, M.E.; Schulenberg, J.E. Prevalence and predictors of adolescent alcohol use and binge drinking in the United States.
Alcohol Res. 2013,35, 193–200. [PubMed]
10.
Patrick, M.E.; Terry-McElrath, Y.M.; Lanza, S.T.; Jager, J.; Schulenberg, J.E.; O’Malley, P.M. Shifting Age of Peak Binge Drinking
Prevalence: Historical Changes in Normative Trajectories Among Young Adults Aged 18 to 30. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2019,43,
287–298. [CrossRef]
11.
Villalbí, J.R.; Serral, G.; Espelt, A.; Puigcorbé, S.; Bartroli, M.; Sureda, X.; Teixidó-Compañó, E.; Bosque-Prous, M. Prevalence of
binge drinking among high school students and urban contextual factors. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 2020,94, e202011150.
12. National Drug Plan. ESTUDES 2023: Survey on Drug Use Among Secondary School Students; Ministry of Health: Madrid, Spain, 2023.
13.
World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard—WHO Data. 2024. Available online: https://covid19.
who.int (accessed on 4 December 2024).
14.
Nicola, M.; Alsafi, Z.; Sohrabi, C.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, M.; Agha, R. The socio-economic implications of
the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int. J. Surg. 2020,78, 185–193. [CrossRef]
15.
Hutchins, H.J.; Wolff, B.; Leeb, R.; Ko, J.Y.; Odom, E.; Willey, J.; Friedman, A.; Bitsko, R.H. COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors by Age
Group—United States, April-June 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020,69, 1584–1590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Dumas, T.M.; Ellis, W.E.; Van Hedger, S.; Litt, D.M.; MacDonald, M. Lockdown, bottoms up? Changes in adolescent substance
use across the COVID-19 pandemic. Addict. Behav. 2022,131, 107326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 22 of 25
17.
Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Green, M.J.; Benzeval, M.; Campbell, D.; Craig, P.; Demou, E.; Leyland, A.; Pearce, A.; Thomson, R.; Whitley, E.;
et al. Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal analyses
of the UK Household Longitudinal Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2021,75, 224–231. [CrossRef]
18.
Fruehwirth, J.C.; Gorman, B.L.; Perreira, K.M. The Effect of Social and Stress-Related Factors on Alcohol Use Among College
Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Adolesc. Health 2021,69, 557–565. [CrossRef]
19.
Bonar, E.E.; Parks, M.J.; Gunlicks-Stoessel, M.; Lyden, G.R.; Mehus, C.J.; Morrell, N.; Patrick, M.E. Binge drinking before and after
a COVID-19 campus closure among first-year college students. Addict. Behav. 2021,118, 106879. [CrossRef]
20.
Stephenson, M.; Riitano, D.; Wilson, S.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Mabire, C.; Cooper, K.; Monteiro da Cruz, D.; Moreno-Casbas, M.;
Lapkin, S. Chapter 12: Systematic reviews of measurement properties. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn,
Z., Eds.; JBI: Adelaide, Australia, 2020. [CrossRef]
21.
Page, M.; McKenzie, J.; Bossuyt, P.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.; Mulrow, C. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for
reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021,372, 71.
22.
Moola, S.; Munn, Z.; Tufanaru, C.; Aromataris, E.; Sears, K.; Sfetcu, R.; Currie, M.; Qureshi, R.; Mattis, P.; Lisy, K.; et al. Chapter
7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; JBI: Adelaide,
Australia, 2020.
23.
Ahuja, M.; Miller-Slough, R.; Adebayo-Abikoye, E.; Williams, C.; Haubner, A.; Dooley, M.G.; Bansal, M.; Sathiyaseelan, T.;
Pons, A.; Karki, A.; et al. Loneliness and Alcohol use among College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural
Appalachia. Chronic Stress 2024,8, 24705470241264909. [CrossRef]
24.
Ammar, A.; Brach, M.; Trabelsi, K.; Chtourou, H.; Boukhris, O.; Masmoudi, L.; Bouaziz, B.; Bentlage, E.; How, D.; Ahmed, M.; et al.
Effects of COVID-19 Home Confinement on Eating Behaviour and Physical Activity: Results of the ECLB-COVID19 International
Online Survey. Nutrients 2020,12, 1583. [CrossRef]
25.
Bianchi, D.; Baiocco, R.; Pompili, S.; Lonigro, A.; Di Norcia, A.; Cannoni, E.; Longobardi, E.; Zammuto, M.; Di Tata, D.; Laghi, F.
Binge Eating and Binge Drinking in Emerging Adults During COVID-19 Lockdown in Italy: An Examination of Protective and
Risk Factors. Emerg. Adulthood 2022,10, 291–303. [CrossRef]
26.
Busse, H.; Buck, C.; Stock, C.; Zeeb, H.; Pischke, C.R.; Fialho, P.M.M.; Wendt, C.; Helmer, S.M. Engagement in Health Risk
Behaviours before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in German University Students: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 1410. [CrossRef]
27.
Clare, P.J.; Aiken, A.; Yuen, W.S.; Upton, E.; Kypri, K.; Degenhardt, L.; Bruno, R.; McCambridge, J.; McBride, N.; Hutchinson, D.;
et al. Alcohol use among young Australian adults in May-June 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study.
Addiction 2021,116, 3398–3407. [CrossRef]
28.
Gohari, M.R.; Varatharajan, T.; MacKillop, J.; Leatherdale, S.T. Dynamic Changes in Drinking Behaviour among Subpopulations
of Youth during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study. Healthcare 2023,11, 1945. [CrossRef]
29.
Gohari, M.R.; Varatharajan, T.; MacKillop, J.; Leatherdale, S.T. Examining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on youth Alcohol
Consumption: Longitudinal Changes From Pre-to Intra-pandemic Drinking in the COMPASS Study. J. Adolesc. Health 2022,71,
665–672. [CrossRef]
30.
Gohari, M.R.; Varatharajan, T.; Patte, K.A.; MacKillop, J.; Leatherdale, S.T. The intersection of internalizing symptoms and alcohol
use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study. Prev. Med. 2023,166, 107381. [CrossRef]
31.
Hoots, B.E.; Li, J.; Hertz, M.F.; Esser, M.B.; Rico, A.; Zavala, E.Y.; Jones, C.M. Alcohol and Other Substance Use Before and During
the COVID-19 Pandemic Among High School Students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2021. MMWR Suppl. 2023,
72, 84–92. [CrossRef]
32.
Kinouani, S.; Macalli, M.; Arsandaux, J.; Montagni, I.; Texier, N.; Schück, S.; Tzourio, C. Factors related to increased alcohol
misuse by students compared to non-students during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France: The Confins study. BMC Public
Health 2024,24, 646, Correction in BMC Public Health 2024,24, 772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18275-6. [CrossRef]
33.
Mallis, N.; Dailey, C.; Drewry, S.; Howard, N.; Cordero, J.F.; Welton, M. SARS-CoV-2 infection and e-cigarette use, binge drinking,
and other associated risk factors in a college population. J. Am. Coll. Health 2022,72, 366–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Miech, R.; Patrick, M.E.; Keyes, K.; O’Malley, P.M.; Johnston, L. Adolescent drug use before and during U.S. national COVID-19
social distancing policies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021,226, 108822. [CrossRef]
35.
Monzon, J.; Barnoya, J.; Mus, S.; Davila, G.; Vidaña-Pérez, D.; Thrasher, J.F. Changes in substance use among adolescents before
and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Guatemala. Front. Psychiatry 2024,15, 1331962. [CrossRef]
36.
Patin, A.; Ladner, J.; Tavolacci, M.P. Change in University Student Health Behaviours after the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022,20, 539. [CrossRef]
37.
Patrick, M.E.; Terry-McElrath, Y.M.; Miech, R.A.; Keyes, K.M.; Jager, J.; Schulenberg, J.E. Alcohol use and the COVID-19 pandemic:
Historical trends in drinking, contexts, and reasons for use among U.S. adults. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022,301, 114887. [CrossRef]
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 23 of 25
38.
Pelham, W.E., 3rd; Yuksel, D.; Tapert, S.F.; Baker, F.C.; Pohl, K.M.; Thompson, W.K.; Podhajsky, S.; Reuter, C.; Zhao, Q.; Eberson-
Shumate, S.C.; et al. Did the acute impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on drinking or nicotine use persist? Evidence from a cohort
of emerging adults followed for up to nine years. Addict. Behav. 2022,131, 107313. [CrossRef]
39.
Rogés, J.; Bosque-Prous, M.; Colom, J.; Folch, C.; Barón-Garcia, T.; González-Casals, H.; Fernández, E.; Espelt, A. Consumption of
Alcohol, Cannabis, and Tobacco in a Cohort of Adolescents before and during COVID-19 Confinement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public
Health 2021,18, 7849. [CrossRef]
40.
Romano, I.; Patte, K.A.; de Groh, M.; Jiang, Y.; Leatherdale, S.T. Perceptions of and adherence to early COVID-19-related
restrictions and associations with substance use among youth in Canada. Perceptions et respect des premières restrictions liées à
la COVID-19 et associations avec la consommation de substances chez les jeunes au Canada. Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev.
Can. 2022,42, 479–489. [CrossRef]
41.
Rubio, M.; van Hooijdonk, K.; Luijten, M.; Kappe, R.; Cillessen, A.H.; Verhagen, M.; Vink, J.M. University students’ (binge)
drinking during COVID-19 lockdowns: An investigation of depression, social context, resilience, and changes in alcohol use.
Soc. Sci. Med. 2023,326, 115925. [CrossRef]
42.
Serkut Bulut, N.; Yorguner, N.; Akvardar, Y. Impact of COVID-19 on the Life of Higher-Education Students in ˙
Istanbul:
Relationship Between Social Support, Health-Risk Behaviors, and Mental/Academic Well-Being. Alpha Psychiatry 2021,22,
291–300. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43.
Shapiro, O.; Gannot, R.N.; Green, G.; Zigdon, A.; Zwilling, M.; Giladi, A.; Ben-Meir, L.; Adilson, M.; Barak, S.; Harel-Fisch, Y.;
et al. Risk Behaviors, Family Support, and Emotional Health among Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 2022,19, 3850. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44.
Sharma, P.; Kamath, C.; Kurani, S.; Pazdernik, V.; Kremers, H.M.; Sauver, J.S.; Croarkin, P.; Geske, J.; Prasad, K.; Patten, C.;
et al. Longitudinal Correlates of Increased Alcohol Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2022,57, 648–655. [CrossRef]
45.
Sylvestre, M.P.; Dinkou, G.D.T.; Naja, M.; Riglea, T.; Pelekanakis, A.; Bélanger, M.; Maximova, K.; Mowat, D.; Paradis, G.;
O’Loughlin, J. A longitudinal study of change in substance use from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic in young adults.
Lancet Reg. Health Am. 2022,8, 100168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46.
Tavolacci, M.P.; Wouters, E.; Van de Velde, S.; Buffel, V.; Déchelotte, P.; Van Hal, G.; Ladner, J. The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown
on Health Behaviors among Students of a French University. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 4346. [CrossRef]
47.
Tholen, R.; Ponnet, K.; Van Hal, G.; De Bruyn, S.; Buffel, V.; Van de Velde, S.; Bracke, P.; Wouters, E. Substance Use among Belgian
Higher Education Students before and during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022,
19, 4348. [CrossRef]
48.
Vallentin-Holbech, L.; Ewing, S.W.F.; Thomsen, K.R. Hazardous alcohol use among Danish adolescents during the second wave
of COVID-19: Link between alcohol use and social life. Nord. Alkohol. Nark. 2023,40, 127–145. [CrossRef]
49.
van Hooijdonk, K.J.M.; Rubio, M.; Simons, S.S.H.; van Noorden, T.H.J.; Luijten, M.; Geurts, S.A.E.; Vink, J.M. Student-, Study- and
COVID-19-Related Predictors of Students’ Smoking, Binge Drinking and Cannabis Use before and during the Initial COVID-19
Lockdown in The Netherlands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022,19, 812. [CrossRef]
50.
Vasconcelos, M.; Crego, A.; Rodrigues, R.; Almeida-Antunes, N.; López-Caneda, E. Effects of the COVID-19 Mitigation Measures
on Alcohol Consumption and Binge Drinking in College Students: A Longitudinal Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,
18, 9822. [CrossRef]
51. Zysset, A.; Volken, T.; Amendola, S.; von Wyl, A.; Dratva, J. Change in Alcohol Consumption and Binge Drinking in University
Students During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Public Health 2022,10, 854350. [CrossRef]
52.
Adan, A.; Forero, D.A.; Navarro, J.F. Personality Traits Related to Binge Drinking: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychiatry 2017,8,
134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Martínez-Hernáez, A.; Marí-Klose, M.; Julià, A.; Escapa, S.; Marí-Klose, P. Consumo episódico excesivo de alcohol en adolescentes:
Su asociación con los estados de ánimo negativos y los factores familiares. Rev. Española de Salud Pública 2012,86, 101–114.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
54.
Stolle, M.; Sack, P.M.; Thomasius, R. Binge drinking in childhood and adolescence: Epidemiology, consequences, and interventions.
Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2009,106, 323–328. [CrossRef]
55.
Valencia Martín, J.L.; Galán, I.; Segura García, L.; Camarelles Guillem, F.; Suárez Cardona, M.; Brime Beteta, B. Episodios de
consumo intensivo de alcohol “Binge drinking”: Retos en su definición e impacto en salud [Binge drinking: The challenges of
definition and its impact on health]. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 2020,94, e202011170.
56.
Gubner, N.R.; Delucchi, K.L.; Ramo, D.E. Associations between binge drinking frequency and tobacco use among young adults.
Addict. Behav. 2016,60, 191–196. [CrossRef]
57.
Keith, D.R.; Hart, C.L.; McNeil, M.P.; Silver, R.; Goodwin, R.D. Frequent marijuana use, binge drinking and mental health
problems among undergraduates. Am. J. Addict. 2015,24, 499–506. [CrossRef]
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 24 of 25
58.
Deniel, S.; Mauduy, M.; Cheam-Bernière, C.; Mauny, N.; Montcharmont, C.; Cabé, N.; Bazire, A.; Mange, J.; Le Berre, A.P.; Jacquet,
D.; et al. Why should we ask binge drinkers if they smoke cannabis? Additive effect of alcohol and cannabis use on college
students’ neuropsychological performance. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2021,14, 100362. [CrossRef]
59.
Tetteh-Quarshie, S.; Risher, M.L. Adolescent brain maturation and the neuropathological effects of binge drinking: A critical
review. Front. Neurosci. 2023,16, 1040049. [CrossRef]
60.
Mejía Martínez, A.; Guzmán Facundo, F.R.; Rodríguez Aguilar, L.; Cristina Pillon, S.; Candia Arrendondo, J.S. Modelo de sistemas
del consumo excesivo de alcohol en estudiantes universitarios. Index. de Enfermería 2021,30, 323–327.
61.
García-Carretero, M.A.; Moreno-Hierro, L.; Robles Martínez, M.; Jordán-Quintero, M.A.; Morales-García, N.; O’Ferrall-González,
C. Patrones de consumo de alcohol en estudiantes universitarios de Ciencias de la Salud. Enfermería Clínica 2019,29, 291–296.
[CrossRef]
62.
Sellés, P.M.; Tomás, M.T.C.; Costa, J.A.G. Diagnostic Utility of New Short Versions of AUDIT to Detect Binge Drinking in
Undergraduate Students. Clínica y Salud 2021,32, 49–54. [CrossRef]
63.
Cheng, T.C.; Lo, C.C. A Causal Analysis of Young Adults’ Binge Drinking Reduction and Cessation. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol.
Educ. 2023,13, 870–882. [CrossRef]
64.
Tavolacci, M.P.; Boerg, E.; Richard, L.; Meyrignac, G.; Dechelotte, P.; Ladner, J. Prevalence of binge drinking and associated
behaviours among 3286 college students in France. BMC Public Health 2016,16, 178. [CrossRef]
65. Farhoudian, A.; Radfar, S.R.; Mohaddes Ardabili, H.; Rafei, P.; Ebrahimi, M.; Khojasteh Zonoozi, A.; De Jong, C.A.J.; Vahidi, M.;
Yunesian, M.; Kouimtsidis, C.; et al. A Global Survey on Changes in the Supply, Price, and Use of Illicit Drugs and Alcohol, and
Related Complications During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry 2021,12, 646206. [CrossRef]
66.
Ueda, M.; Stickley, A.; Sueki, H.; Matsubayashi, T. Mental health status of the general population in Japan during the COVID-19
pandemic. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020,74, 505–506. [CrossRef]
67.
Yamamoto, T.; Uchiumi, C.; Suzuki, N.; Yoshimoto, J.; Murillo-Rodriguez, E. The Psychological Impact of ‘Mild Lockdown’ in
Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey under a Declared State of Emergency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public
Health 2020,17, 9382. [CrossRef]
68.
Stickley, A.; Shirama, A.; Inagawa, T.; Sumiyoshi, T. Binge drinking in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: Prevalence,
correlates and association with preventive behaviors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022,234, 109415. [CrossRef]
69. Busto Miramontes, A.; Moure-Rodríguez, L.; Mallah, N.; Díaz-Geada, A.; Corral, M.; Cadaveira, F.; Caamaño-Isorna, F. Alcohol
Consumption among Freshman College Students in Spain: Individual and Pooled Analyses of Three Cross-Sectional Surveys
(2005, 2012 and 2016). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 2548. [CrossRef]
70.
Tran, A.; Jiang, H.; Lange, S.; Livingston, M.; Manthey, J.; Neufeld, M.; Room, R.; Štelem
˙
ekas, M.; Telksnys, T.; Petkeviˇcien
˙
e, J.;
et al. The Impact of Increasing the Minimum Legal Drinking Age from 18 to 20 Years in Lithuania on All-Cause Mortality in
Young Adults-An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. Alcohol Alcohol. 2022,57, 513–519. [CrossRef]
71.
Amezcua, M.; García Pedregal, E.; Jordana, J.; Llisterri, J.L.; Rodríguez Sampedro, A.; Villarino Marín, A. La educación ante el
consumo de riesgo de bebidas alcohóli-cas: Propuesta de actuación multidisciplinar desde el profesional de la salud [Educa-tion
facing risk consumption of alcoholic beverages—A proposal for interdisciplinary action from the health care professional].
Nutr. Hosp. 2020,34, 609–615. [CrossRef]
72.
Domínguez-Salas, S.; Gómez-Salgado, J.; Andrés-Villas, M.; Díaz-Milanés, D.; Romero-Martín, M.; Ruiz-Frutos, C. Psycho-
Emotional Approach to the Psychological Distress Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Observational
Study. Healthcare 2020,8, 190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Abdeahad, N.; Mock, S. The role of past campus recreational sports participation in predicting students’ stress and competence
during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Leis. Res. 2023,54, 269–285. [CrossRef]
74.
Hultgren, B.A.; Smith-LeCavalier, K.N.; Canning, J.R.; Jaffe, A.E.; Kim, I.S.; Cegielski, V.I.; Garcia, T.A.; Larimer, M.E. College
students’ virtual and in-person drinking contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2022,46, 2089–2102.
[CrossRef]
75.
Benner, A.D.; Harrington, M.K.; Kealy, C.; Nwafor, C.E. The COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents’ and young adults’ experiences
at school: A systematic narrative review. J. Res. Adolesc. 2025,35, e12935. [CrossRef]
76.
Jander, A.; Crutzen, R.; Mercken, L.; Candel, M.; de Vries, H. Effects of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Game to Reduce Binge
Drinking Among Dutch Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2016,18, e29. [CrossRef]
77.
Lima-Serrano, M.; Fernández-León, P.; Mercken, L.; Martínez-Montilla, J.M.; de Vries, H. An Animation- Versus Text-Based
Computer-Tailored Game Intervention to Prevent Alcohol Consumption and Binge Drinking in Adolescents: Study Protocol.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 9978. [CrossRef]
78.
Martinez-Montilla, J.M.; Mercken, L.; de Vries, H.; Candel, M.; Lima-Rodríguez, J.S.; Lima-Serrano, M. A Web-Based, Computer-
Tailored Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Consumption and Binge Drinking Among Spanish Adolescents: Cluster Randomized
Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020,22, e15438. [CrossRef]
J. Clin. Med. 2025,14, 1546 25 of 25
79.
Vargas-Martínez, A.M.; Lima-Serrano, M.; Trapero-Bertran, M. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of a web-based
computer-tailored intervention for prevention of binge drinking among Spanish adolescents. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2023,47,
319–335. [CrossRef]
80.
Botella López, M.; Giménez Costa, J.A.; Cortés Tomás, M.T. AUDIT, AUDIT-C y AR2I para evaluar el binge drinking en
universitarios españoles. Health Addict./Salud Y Drog. 2020,20, 147–157. [CrossRef]
81.
Lupi, M.; Martinotti, G.; Di Giannantonio, M. Drunkorexia: An emerging trend in young adults. Eat. Weight Disord. EWD 2017,
22, 619–622. [CrossRef]
82.
Vogt, K.S.; Harper, M.; Griffin, B.L.
. . .
because I’m so drunk at the time, the last thing I’m going to think about is calories”:
Strengthening the argument for Drunkorexia as a food and alcohol disturbance, evidence from a qualitative study. Br. J. Health
Psychol. 2022,27, 1188–1208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
83.
Pérez-Ortiz, N.; Andrade-Gómez, E.; Fagundo-Rivera, J.; Fernández-León, P. Comprehensive Management of Drunkorexia: A
Scoping Review of Influencing Factors and Opportunities for Intervention. Nutrients 2024,16, 3894. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
84.
Pompili, S.; Laghi, F. Drunkorexia among adolescents: The role of motivations and emotion regulation. Eat. Behav. 2018,29, 1–7.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
85.
Kilian, C.; O’Donnell, A.; Potapova, N.; López-Pelayo, H.; Schulte, B.; Miquel, L.; Castillo, B.P.; Schmidt, C.S.; Gual, A.; Rehm, J.;
et al. Changes in alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Drug Alcohol
Rev. 2022,41, 918–931. [CrossRef]
86.
Scott, S.; Muir, C.; Stead, M.; Fitzgerald, N.; Kaner, E.; Bradley, J.; Wrieden, W.; Power, C.; Adamson, A. Exploring the links
between unhealthy eating behaviour and heavy alcohol use in the social, emotional and cultural lives of young adults (aged
18–25): A qualitative research study. Appetite 2020,144, 104449. [CrossRef]
87.
Dinger, M.K.; Brittain, D.R.; O’Mara, H.M.; Peterson, B.M.; Hall, K.C.; Hadley, M.K.; Sharp, T.A. The relationship between
physical activity and binge drinking among college students: A qualitative investigation. Am. J. Health Educ. 2018,49, 33–39.
[CrossRef]
88.
Sampedro-Piquero, P.; Zancada-Menéndez, C.; Bernabéu-Brotons, E.; Moreno-Fernández, R.D. The Relationship between Binge
Drinking and Binge Eating in Adolescence and Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
2022,20, 232. [CrossRef]
89.
Pérez de Guzmán Pérez, M. Consumo intensivo de alcohol en adolescentes y riesgos en su desarrollo. Revisión Bibliográfica
Nuberos Científica 2019,3, 22–29. Available online: https://ciberindex.com/c/nc/2822nc (accessed on 21 February 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background and objectives: Drunkorexia is a novel alcohol-related disorder prevalent among adolescents and young adults. Extensive research on the causes and their relationship is lacking. Identifying these aspects could improve early detection and management by healthcare professionals. The aim of this review was to identify the influencing factors of drunkorexia in adolescents and young adults, as well as the main opportunities for action by health professionals. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in June and July 2024 using three databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science). A search and review protocol were established and registered in PROSPERO. The research questions were formulated in Patient, Concept, Context (PCC) formats for an adequate literature review. Original articles from January 2008 to July 2024 were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, and doctoral theses or academic texts were excluded. In the screening phase, a methodological assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s (JBI) critical appraisal tools to support study eligibility. Depending on the study design, different checklists were used, and cross-sectional studies that received scores of 4/8 or higher, quasi-experimental designs that obtained 5/9 or higher, and qualitative research that obtained 5/10 or higher were accepted. Results: A total of 1502 studies were initially found. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 20 studies were selected. Complications of emotion regulation, both positive and negative metacognitive beliefs, inability to effectively manage stress and anxiety, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, self-discipline and self-control, or differences in social expectations are predisposing factors for drunkorexia. The management of malnutrition and dehydration is an opportunity for clinical professionals to address this problem. In addition, mental health issues can provide another opportunity to manage heavy alcohol consumption. Conclusions: Drunkorexia must be recognized as a new disease to be addressed from a multidisciplinary perspective. In this way, increasing research on this trend would support prevention and intervention strategies. The use of digital platforms is essential for raising social awareness of this negative habit.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Binge drinking and heavy alcohol use are highly prevalent among college students. During the COVID-19 pandemic, due to lockdown restrictions and other challenges, many college students were burdened with loneliness, which can contribute to chronic stress, and substance use. The current study explores the association between loneliness and various levels of alcohol use among college students in the rural, underserved region of Central Appalachia, USA. Methods Data were collected from a regional sample (n = 320) of college age adults, age 18-25 in the Central Appalachian region. The UCLA-3 item Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3) was used in the study to evaluate loneliness. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between levels of loneliness and three separate outcomes, including past year binge drinking, past year heavy alcohol use, and past year weekly alcohol use. Results Overall, 25.5% of the participants reported severe loneliness, 33.6% reported moderate, and 40.9% reported low levels of loneliness. Results of the adjusted models revealed that severe loneliness was associated with higher odds of heavy alcohol use (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI [1.02, 3.50]) and binge drinking (AOR = 2.96, 95% CI [1.16, 7.51]), and not associated with weekly alcohol use. Conclusion The study found that higher levels of loneliness were linked to both binged drinking and heavy alcohol use. Further efforts for counseling and treatment among college students who are burdened with severe loneliness should be considered. The chronic stress associated with severe loneliness needs to be further addressed, particularly among emerging adults.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 16th, schools had to be closed in Guatemala and went to online teaching. We sought to analyze the change in substance use among high school students in Guatemala associated with the lockdown. Methods Data from two surveys (2019, n=2096, and 2020, n=1606) of a student cohort in private high schools in Guatemala City was used. Logistic models for past 30-day cigarette, e-cigarette, marijuana, and alcohol (including binge drinking) were used, regressing these on survey wave, while adjusting for sex, scholastic performance, high school year of student, parental education, substance use, and household member tobacco use. Results Prevalence declined for smoking (10% to 3%, p<0.001), e-cigarette (31% to 14%, p<0.001), marijuana (4.3% to 1.9%, p<0.001), and alcohol use (47% to 38.5%, p<0.001), and binge drinking (24% to 13%, p<0.001). Adjusted models showed wave 2 associated with lower odds of using cigarettes (AOR=0.44, 95%CI=0.32-0.62), e-cigarettes (AOR=0.41, 95% CI=0.35-0.49, p<0.001), and binge drinking (AOR=0.73, 95%CI=0.59-0.89; p=0.002) Conclusion Among Guatemalan adolescents, COVID-19 restrictions were associated with a significant decrease in smoking, e-cigarette use, and binge drinking.
Article
Full-text available
Background The closure of bars and lockdowns related to the Covid-19 pandemic changed alcohol use levels in France during the spring of 2020. We wondered whether this sudden cessation of social interactions impacted students more than non-students and what factors specific to students would explain the increase in alcohol misuse. The aims of this study were to compare self-reported changes in alcohol misuse (alcohol intake and binge-drinking frequency) during the first Covid-19 lockdown from March 17 to May 10, 2020, between French students and non-students and describe factors associated with this alcohol misuse in each subgroup. Methods Data collected in the Confins study from April 8 to May 10, 2020, were used in cross-sectional analyses stratified by student status. Multiple logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between self-reported increase in alcohol intake or binge-drinking frequency (at least six drinks of alcohol on one occasion) and demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors, as well as conditions associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. The population-attributable fraction was then used to estimate the contribution of identified risk factors to increased alcohol misuse in students and non-students. Results Among both students and non-students, a self-reported decrease or no change in alcohol intake or binge-drinking was more common than an increase. However, the risk factors explaining an increase in alcohol intake differed among students (≥ 25 years old, not working or studying in the health field, and having suicidal ideation during the last 7 days) and non-students (having a medical diagnosis of mental disorders). The risk factors explaining an increase in binge-drinking frequency were similar in the two subgroups (being a tobacco smoker before lockdown and not practicing any physical activity during the last 7 days), except suicidal thoughts, which was a risk factor for alcohol misuse specific to students. Conclusions These results highlight the vulnerability of certain French students to alcohol misuse and the necessity of combining both mental health and substance use-related screening in the student population.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Youth drinking is highly heterogenous, and subpopulations representing different alcohol use patterns may have responded differently to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined changing patterns of alcohol use in subpopulations of the youth population over the first two years of the pandemic. Method: We used linked survey data from 5367 Canadian secondary school students who participated in three consecutive waves of the COMPASS study between 2018/19 and 2020/21. Latent transition analysis (LTA) was used to identify patterns of alcohol use based on the frequency of drinking and frequency of binge drinking and to estimate the probability of transitioning between identified patterns. Results: LTA identified five patterns of alcohol use each representing a unique subpopulation: abstainer, occasional drinker-no binging, occasional binge drinker, monthly binge drinker, weekly binge drinker. Probability of being engaged in binge drinking for a subpopulation of occasional drinkers pre-pandemic was 61%, which reduced to 43% during the early-pandemic period. A lower proportion of occasional binge drinkers reported moving to monthly or weekly binge drinking. Female occasional drinkers were more likely to move to binge drinking patterns during the pandemic than males. Conclusions: Less frequent drinking and younger students were more likely to reduce their drinking and binge drinking than more established drinkers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding of heterogenous patterns of alcohol drinking and different responses to public health crises may inform future preventive programs tailored to target subpopulations more effectively.
Article
Full-text available
Background: This study, using the multiple disadvantage model (MDM), sought to identify factors (disadvantaging social disorganization, social structural, social integration, health/mental health, co-occurring substance use, and substance treatment access factors) in young adults' binge drinking reduction and cessation in the United States. Methods: We extracted data on 942 young adult binge drinkers (25-34 years, 47.8% female) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), carrying out a temporal-ordered causal analysis, meaning the evaluation of select variables' impacts on an outcome at a subsequent time. Results: MDM found a relatively high reduction likelihood for non-Hispanic African Americans and respondents with relatively more education. MDM found a relatively low reduction likelihood accompanying an alcohol-related arrest, higher income, and greater number of close friends. Change to nondrinking was found more likely for non-Hispanic African Americans, other non-Hispanic participants having minority ethnicity, older respondents, those with more occupational skills, and healthier respondents. Such change became less likely with an alcohol-related arrest, higher income, relatively more education, greater number of close friends, close friends' disapproval of drinking, and co-occurring drug use. Conclusions: Interventions incorporating a motivational-interviewing style can effectively promote health awareness, assessment of co-occurring disorders, friendships with nondrinkers, and attainment of occupational skills.
Article
Full-text available
Adolescence is a critical phase of development and is frequently a period of initiating and engaging in risky behaviors, including alcohol and other substance use. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated stressors might have affected adolescent involvement in these behaviors. To examine substance use patterns and understand how substance use among high school students changed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, CDC analyzed data from the nationally representative Youth Risk Behavior Survey. This report presents estimated prevalences among high school students of current (i.e., previous 30 days) alcohol use, marijuana use, binge drinking, and prescription opioid misuse and lifetime alcohol, marijuana, synthetic marijuana, inhalants, ecstasy, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and injection drug use and prescription opioid misuse. Trends during 2009-2021 were assessed using logistic regression and joinpoint regression analyses. Changes in substance use from 2019 to 2021 were assessed using prevalence differences and prevalence ratios, stratified by demographic characteristics. Prevalence of substance use measures by sexual identity and current co-occurring substance use were estimated using 2021 data. Substance use prevalence declined during 2009-2021. From 2019 to 2021, the prevalence of current alcohol use, marijuana use, and binge drinking and lifetime use of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine and prescription opioid misuse decreased; lifetime inhalant use increased. In 2021, substance use varied by sex, race and ethnicity, and sexual identity. Approximately one third of students (29%) reported current use of alcohol or marijuana or prescription opioid misuse; among those reporting current substance use, approximately 34% used two or more substances. Widespread implementation of tailored evidence-based policies, programs, and practices likely to reduce risk factors for adolescent substance use and promote protective factors might further decrease substance use among U.S. high school students and is urgently needed in the context of the changing marketplaces for alcohol beverage products and other drugs (e.g., release of high-alcohol beverage products and increased availability of counterfeit pills containing fentanyl).
Article
Full-text available
Background Binge drinking (BD) among adolescents is a public health concern worldwide. This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility of a web‐based computer‐tailored intervention to prevent BD in adolescence. Methods The sample was drawn from a study evaluating the Alerta Alcohol program. The population consisted of adolescents 15 to 19 years of age. Data were recorded at baseline (January to February 2016) and after 4 months (May to June 2017) and were used to estimate costs and health outcomes, as measured by the number of BD occasions and quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility ratios were calculated from National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspectives and for a time horizon of 4 months. A multivariate deterministic sensitivity analysis of best/worst scenarios by subgroups was used to account for uncertainty. Results The cost of reducing BD occasions by one per month was €16.63 from the NHS perspective, which from the societal perspective resulted in savings of €7986.37. From the societal perspective, the intervention resulted in an incremental cost of €71.05 per QALY gained from the NHS perspective and this was dominant, resulting in savings of €34,126.64 per QALY gained in comparison with the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that the intervention was dominant for girls from both the perspectives and for individuals 17 years or older from the NHS perspective. Conclusions Computer‐tailored feedback is a cost‐effective way to reduce BD and increase QALYs among adolescents. However, long‐term follow‐up is needed to evaluate more fully changes in both BD and health‐related quality of life.
Article
The COVID‐19 pandemic upended the lives of adolescents and young adults across the globe. In response to the pandemic onset, educational institutions were forced to pivot to online learning, a new teaching and learning format for most secondary and university students. This systematic narrative review summarizes findings from 168 publications spanning 56 countries on students' educational outcomes and school climate as well as the internal assets and contextual supports that promoted academic well‐being during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that young people commonly reported declines in their academic‐related outcomes and school‐based relationships due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Internal assets (e.g., intrinsic motivation and self‐efficacy) and contextual supports (i.e., relationships with teachers, peers, and parents) promoted academic well‐being during the pandemic. Next steps for research on young people's academic well‐being during the pandemic are suggested.
Article
Rationale: The first COVID-19 lockdown impacted the social life and behaviors of university students, such as alcohol use. While previous studies have reported changes in students' alcohol use during the lockdown, knowledge of risk groups like binge drinkers is limited. Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate how the first lockdown impacted the alcohol use of university students who were regular binge drinkers before the lockdown. Methods: Cross-sectional data were used to explore self-reported changes in alcohol use and associated psychosocial effects in regular binge drinking versus regular drinking university students (N = 7355) during the first COVID-19 lockdown (Spring 2020) in the Netherlands. Results: University students generally drank less alcohol and reduced binge drinking behaviors during the lockdown. Being a binge drinker who increased/maintained alcohol use, or a regular drinker who increased, was associated with older age, fewer servings of alcohol per week before COVID-19, higher contact with friends, and not living with parents. Among regular binge drinkers, men increased their alcohol use during the lockdown significantly more than women. Among regular drinkers, those with high depressive symptoms and low resilience had increased alcohol use. Conclusions: These findings give insight into significant changes in drinking behaviors among university students during the first COVID-19 lockdown. More importantly, it underscores the need to reckon vulnerable students considering drinking type and associated psychosocial variables for increasing or maintaining higher alcohol use during societal stress periods. In the present study, an unexpected at-risk group emerged among regular drinkers who increased alcohol use during the lockdown in association with their mental state (i.e., depression and resilience). As the COVID-19 pandemic, and the possibility of similar scenarios in the future, is still present in the current student life, specific preventive strategies and interventions should be targeted accordingly.