ArticlePDF Available

Effect of combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training in older adults with post‑stroke cognitive impairment

Authors:
WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JOURNAL 7: 39, 2025
Abstract. Cognitive impairment affects >50% of individuals
who survive for 6 months following a stroke. Cognitive impair‑
ment not only reduces the ability of patients to relearn motor
skills due to memory problems or poor judgment, but also
signicantly impairs daily living activities and quality of life.
Early intervention in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) not
only improves cognition, but also attenuates the progression to
dementia. The present controlled prospective study included
38 older adults with post‑stroke MCI, who were assigned to
the intervention group (aerobic + cognitive exercise) and the
control group (cognitive exercise). Both groups participated in
60‑min sessions, three times per week, for 12 weeks (4 weeks
in the hospital and 8 weeks at home). The intervention group
exhibited a significant improvement in cognitive function
(Montreal cognitive assessment and frontal assessment battery,
P<0.05), as well as in physical function and quality of life,
compared to the control group. On the whole, the present study
demonstrates that the combination of aerobic and cognitive
exercise is benecial leading to improvements in the cognitive
function, physical function and quality of life of individuals
with post‑stroke MCI.
Introduction
Stroke is one of the main causes of mortality and permanent
disability. The stroke rate doubles every decade and frequently
affects individuals aged ≥55 years (1). Of note, ~90% of
stroke survivors continue to suffer from chronic sequelae, and
~30% of these patients are unable to perform daily activities
independently (2). Among these sequelae, cognitive impair
ment, a common consequence of stroke, affects >50% of
individuals who survive for 6 months following a stroke (3).
Another study found that 83% of patients had impairment
in at least one cognitive domain, while 50% had cognitive
impairment across multiple domains (4). The American
Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA)
Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation and Treatment in Adults
(2016) state that the majority of patients who suffer a
clinical stroke undergo cognitive assessment prior to hospital
discharge (5). Cognitive impairment and cognitive rehabilita‑
tion have been identied as top research priorities in stroke
survivors (top 10). The majority of available treatments aim to
either restore lost skills or to teach compensatory techniques;
however, the evidence has not been persuasive yet (6,7).
A previous systematic review article found that targeted
cognitive training in specic cognitive domains provides several
positive effects (8). Starovasnik Žagavec et al (9) conducted a
study with 11 stroke survivors who underwent intensive training
in selective attention. The results of their study revealed a signif
icant improvement from a moderate to strong level in divided
attention, and a mild effect on alertness (9). Another study high
lighted the functional connectivity of the hippocampus with
the left frontal and parietal lobes through cognitive training,
indicating a key mechanism in cognitive recovery following a
st roke (10). Physical exercise is another effective approach for
improving the cognitive function of patients. A previous system
atic review examin ing the effects of physical activity on cognitive
function following a stroke demonstrated that physical exercise
exerted signicant cognitive benets (11). Aerobic exercise not
only exerts benecial effects in improving physical function
and reducing the risk of developing secondary complications,
but also reduces the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and
related cognitive disorders (12). Aerobic exercise has a positive
effect on overall cognitive function, with potential benets to
memory, attention and the visuospatial domain in stroke survi
vors (13). The improvement in cognitive function following
exercise is probably due to the regulation of angiogenic and
neurotrophic growth factors, which may facilitate neurogenesis,
circuitry and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and other
cognitively relevant cortical regions (14).
There is mounting evidence to indicate that combining
aerobic interventions with cognitive training may yield
additional benets to cognitive performance, surpassing the
effects of a single type of training alone (15). Combining
physical activity with cognitive training leads to signicant
cognitive improvements and reduces depression symptoms in
older adults (16). A previous systematic review found that this
combination enhanced overall cognitive function, memory,
Effect of combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training
in older adults with post‑stroke cognitive impairment
THI NGOC ANH NGUYEN1 and VAN MINH PHAM1,2
1Rehabilitation Department, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; 2Hanoi Rehabilitation Hospital, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Received December 5, 2024; Accepted February 6, 2025
DOI: 10.3892/wasj.2025.327
Correspondence to: Professor Van Minh Pham, Rehabilitation
Department, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung Road,
Trung Tu, Dong Da, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
E‑mail: phamvanminh@hmu.edu.vn
Key words: aerobic exercise, cognitive training, cognitive
impairment, older adults, stroke
NGUYEN and PHAM: A EROBIC EXERCISE AND COGNITIVE TRAINING FOR POST‑STROKE MCI
2
executive function and attention, in both cognitively impaired
and non‑impaired populations (17). In another study, in a
population with cognitive impairment following a stroke, the
combination of exercise and cognitive training exerted greater
benecial effects on cognitive function compared to exercise
alone (18). In addition, a previous study posited that for exercise
to effectively produce combined neurological and cognitive
benets, it needs to occur within a cognitively challenging
environment (19). Performing aerobic sessions prior to cogni‑
tive training prepares the brain for compensatory recruitment
during the subsequent cognitive training session (17). Aerobic
exercise prior to cognitive exercise can increase arousal levels,
facilitate neurogenesis and enhance memory consolidation,
which may benet memory retrieval and cognitive task perfor
mance afterwards (20).
Several studies have evaluated the effects of combining
physical activity with cognitive training in older adults or
those with cognitive impairment (16‑18). However, evidence
in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) after
stroke remains limited. The present study aimed to evaluate a
group of older adults for several reasons. First, the incidence
of stroke is higher among older adults. Older adults with
MCI following a stroke, if not addressed early, are at a risk
of further cognitive decline due to the degenerative process,
which may lead to the early onset of dementia and progress
more severely. Additionally, older adults generally engage
in less physical activity compared to younger individuals,
rendering them more likely to benet from participation in a
structured exercise program, which can improve adherence to
the training regimen.
In the present study, patient recruitment was conducted
at the National Geriatric Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, with
the target group primarily consisting of older adults. It
was observed that older adults with cognitive impairment
following a stroke often require long‑term care, which places
a notable burden on both families and society. It should be
noted that the classication of the ‘older adult’ age group is not
standardized across various organizations. The present study
followed the denition provided by the National Institute on
Aging (NIA) and the classications used in numerous Western
countries and studies, which dene older adults as individuals
aged ≥65 years. Furthermore, the methods of combining these
interventions need to be carefully considered for optimal
effectiveness. Patients residing at a marked distance from the
hospital or those with limited access to prolonged in‑hospital
programs may derive fewer benefits from the intervention
compared to others. Therefore, the present study not only
evaluated the effectiveness of sequential aerobic exercise and
cognitive training, but also proposed an intervention program
with follow‑up after hospital discharge. It was hypothesized
that the combination of aerobic exercise and cognitive training
would improve the cognitive function, physical health and
quality of life of patients than cognitive intervention alone.
Patients and methods
Study type and population. The present study was a controlled
prospective study and adopted a convenience sampling method
to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined aerobic exercise in
treating mild cognitive impairment following a stroke.
The sample size formula for a two‑independent‑sample
study, with a type I error probability of 5%, a two‑tailed test,
and 80% power, as proposed by Yeh et al (21), indicated a vari‑
ance of σ²=4.92 for the intervention group. A mean difference
of ∆=4.7 between the two groups was expected. The minimum
sample size per group was 17, with a 10% increase to ensure
adequacy, resulting in 19 participants per group.
Stroke survivors with MCI who met the inclusion criteria
were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention
or control group. Participants were rst paired based on similar
characteristics, and subsequently, within each pair, random
ization was used to assign one participant to the intervention
group and the other to the control group. One researcher was
responsible for conducting the screening and assessments both
before and after the intervention, while another researcher
was assigned to randomize the participants and prescribe the
corresponding exercise protocols.
There were no modications to the intervention method
following the recruitment of the participants. Each group
practiced for 60 min per day, 3 days per week, for 12 weeks.
A total of 36 sessions were divided into two phases as follows:
The rst 4 weeks in the hospital and the following 8 weeks at
home. No interim analysis was performed during the study.
Participation and recruitment. The study was conducted
at the Rehabilitation Department of the National Geriatric
Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam. Participants were provided with
all information about the study and signed a consent form after
understanding the details of the study.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with a
confirmed diagnosis of MCI following an ischemic stroke
[according to DSM‑5 diagnostic criteria, Montreal cognitive
assessment (MoCA) score <26, mini‑mental state examination
score ≥19]; ii) patients with the rst ischemic stroke occurring
within the past 6 months; iii) those with an age ≥65 years;
iv) those with the ability to pa rticipate in the program, including
sufficient mobility, balance, cognitive capacity to engage
in and adhere to the program, and the presence of a family
member or caregiver to monitor and supervise self‑practice
process; v) those who agreed to provide informed consent and
participate in the study.
The exclusion criteria were the following: i) Patients with
other neurological disorders, such as Parkinson's disease,
multiple sclerosis, etc.; ii) patients with injuries or musculo
skeletal diseases that markedly impaired mobility, preventing
participation in the program; ii) patients with acute or chronic
respiratory or cardiovascular diseases that were not stably
controlled or were at a risk of acute exacerbations during
physical activity.
The present study was approved by Hanoi Medical
University under Decision No. 3963/QĐ‑ĐHYHN, dated
September 26, 2022 and Hanoi Medical University
Institutional Ethical Review Board under Decision No.
1259/GCN‑HDDDNCYSH‑DHYHN, dated May 7, 2024. All
patients provided a written consent to participate in this study.
Clinical intervention, part 1: Training program in the hospital
(rst 4 weeks)
Aerobic exercise. Patients in the intervention group performed
a 30‑min treadmill exercise, including 3 min of warm‑up, and
WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JOURNAL 7: 39, 2025 3
25 min of main exercise (walking on the treadmill) and ending
with 2 min of cool‑down. The target intensity of the exercise
was moderate, assessed by aiming for a target heart rate during
the aerobic period that was 40% of the reserve heart rate of the
patient, calculated using the Karvonen formula. Additionally,
the Borg Perceived Exertion Scale was recorded during each
session. Depending on the ability and the physical activity
level of each individual, the 25‑min main exercise was divided
into 2‑3 intervals, interspersed with short 2‑min rest periods,
to achieve the target after 4 weeks. Achieving the target
meant reaching the target heart rate and completing 25 min
of sustained exercise. All sessions were conducted by physical
therapists. The exercise was fully monitored by rehabilitation
doctors and physiotherapists to observe the symptoms of the
patient and adjust the intensity as needed (Fig. 1).
Cognitive training. The cognitive training program
was conducted on paper, focusing on cognitive domains
commonly impaired in patients who have suffered a stroke,
including executive function, processing speed, concentration
and attention, memory, etc. Participants performed various
tasks and the level was gradually increased until an improve
ment was observed. Occupational therapists conducted and
monitored the sessions. The duration of cognitive training
was 30 min per day for the intervention group and 60 min
per day for the control group. The following exercises were
performed: i) Memory exercises: Interventions for memory
retrieval (mnemonic methods for language memor y recover y;
organizing information into categories; using visual imagery
to enhance semantic memory; linking new information
with previously known information, etc.) and compensa
tory memory interventions (using devices, schedules, etc.).
ii) Attention, concentration and processing speed exercises:
Applying attention process training to improve sustained,
selective, alternating and divided attention. iii) Executive
function exercises: Applying metacognitive strategy training
to process tasks.
Clinical intervention, part 2: Home training program
(8 weeks). The program was continued at home following the
instructions provided at the hospital. The duration of training
was 8 weeks, comprising 24 sessions in total.
Aerobic exercise consisted of brisk walking on a flat
surface to achieve the target intensity. Cognitive exercises
involved instructing patients to prepare comic strips, images
and various objects related to different topics, similar to the
tasks practiced during their hospital sessions. In addition,
patients were provided with a document that recorded the exer
cises, along with illustrative images of previously taught tasks.
This allowed patients to continue practicing at home with the
support of family members or caregivers.
Compliance monitoring. Groups of patients were created
on the phone app with 3‑5 patients per group. All participants
were required to exercise within a specied time frame each
day and on specic days of the week. Researchers were aware
of the training schedules for each group and regularly moni
tored and supervised each the training sessions of group via
video using phone software. A tracking sheet was used for
each patient. The evaluators veried the exercise sessions of
the patients according to the exercise schedule of each group
and marked the tracking sheet accordingly.
Outcome assessment. The outcomes were evaluated at two‑time
points as follows: Once before the intervention began and again
at 12 weeks following the commencement of the intervention.
Primary outcome measures. Primary outcome measures
were cognitive functions, including the MoCA and the frontal
assessment battery (FAB). The MoCA is a brief screening tool
with a high sensitivity and specicity for detecting mild cogni
tive impairment, assessing six domains: Memory, executive
function, attention, language, visuospatial ability and orienta‑
tion. The FAB includes six subdomains related to frontal lobe
function and is a simple tool for assessing frontal lobe function.
Secondary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes
included measures of physical function and quality of life.
Physical functions were assessed using the Fugl‑Meyer
Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA‑LE) and the 6‑min walk
test (6MWT). The FMA‑LE is designed to evaluate motor
function, balance, sensation and joint function in patients of
all ages with post‑stroke hemiplegia. The 6MWT measures the
distance a patient can walk in 6 min and is used as an indicator
of walking endurance. It is an important predictor of mobility
and community integration in stroke survivors.
Quality of life was assessed using the European Quality of
Life‑5 Dimension‑5 Level (EQ‑5D‑5L) instrument. This tool
evaluates ve health aspects: Mobility, self‑care, usual daily
activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression. Each
aspect is rated on a ve‑level severity scale: No problems,
slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and
extreme problems.
Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed using SPSS
20.0 software (IBM Corp.). The Kolmogorov‑Smirnov test was
used to assess the normality of the data. The basic characteris
tics of the participants were compared using the Chi‑squared
(χ²) test and Fisher's exact test. The Wilcoxon signed rank test
was used to compare pre‑ and post‑intervention values within
each group. To compare the differences between the two groups,
the Mann‑Whitney U test was applied. To evaluate the strength
of the difference, the effect size was calculated using the r
Figure 1. Aerobic exercise training.
NGUYEN and PHAM: A EROBIC EXERCISE AND COGNITIVE TRAINING FOR POST‑STROKE MCI
4
coefcient for each outcome: r≤0.1, small effect size; 0.1<r≤0.3,
moderate effect size; and r>0.3, large effect size. A value of
P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant
difference. The Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust the
P‑values, thereby controlling the overall type I error rate at 0.05
across all statistical tests conducted in the study.
Results
Initially, 50 ischemic stroke survivors were selected, of whom
12 did not meet the age eligibility criteria. Therefore, 38
stroke survivors with MCI were randomly assigned to two
groups as follows: An intervention groups (n=19) and a control
group (n=19) (Fig. 2). The selection and follow‑up period
took place concurrently from November 1, 2022, to May 31,
2023. During this period, participants were enrolled, trained,
and followed‑up. The follow‑up continued until July 31, 2023.
No changes were made to the study outcomes after the study
commenced. No adverse events were reported during the
study, and the study was conducted according to the planned
protocol until its completion. The results revealed that no
signicant difference was observed in the demographic char
acteristics between the two groups (P>0.05), apart from sex
(P<0.05; Table I).
Primary outcome measures. After applying the Bonferroni
correction, the MoCA score results indicated that both groups
exhibited a significant improvement following treatment,
for the intervention group (P=0.003) and the control group
(P=0.014). However, the difference in MoCA score changes
between the intervention and control groups was not statisti
cally signicant (P=0.041). As regards the FAB scores, the
intervention group exhibited a signicantly greater improve
ment compared to the control group (P=0.008). The FAB score
in the intervention group improved signicantly (P=0.001); by
contrast, the improvement in the control group was not statisti‑
cally signicant (P=0.068) (Table II).
Secondary outcome measures. The data collected using the
sub‑measures in FMA‑LE, 6MWT and EQ‑5D‑5L (Tabl e III)
revealed that both groups experienced significant physical
improvement following treatment, with the intervention
group demonstrating a signicant change compared to the
control group. After applying the Bonferroni correction, the
intervention group exhibited signicant improvements in both
FMA‑LE and 6MWT, whereas in the control group, only the
6MWT exhibited signicant improvements. As regards quality
of life, only the intervention group exhibited a significant
improvement (P=0.002) (Table III).
Discussion
The results of the present study demonstrated that the group
participating in aerobic exercises experienced positive
Figure 2. Flowchart of the study design.
WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JOURNAL 7: 39, 2025 5
improvements in general cognition compared to the group
that received cognitive training only. This supports the initial
hypothesis that incorporating aerobic exercise would lead to
greater overall cognitive improvement. The intervention group
also demonstrated notable improvements in physical function
and quality of life outcomes.
Table I. General characteristics of the study participants.
Variables Intervention group (n=19) Control group (n=19) P‑value
Age (years) 71.42±5.10 73.95±7.04 0.278
Sex 0.036
Male 16 (84.2) 10 (52.6)
Female 3 (15.8) 9 (47.4)
BMI 20.75±1.55 20.32±1.56 0.365
NIHSS score 6.47±1.98 5.68±1.89 0.218
Side of brain lesion 0.103
Right 6 (31.6) 11 (57.9)
Left 13 (68.4) 8 (42.1)
Education 0.201
I (primary school) 8 (42.1) 3 (15.8)
II (middle school) 5 (26.3) 7 (36.8)
III (secondary school) 6 (31.6) 9 (47.4)
Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; BMI, body mass index.
Table II. Primary outcome measures.
Wilcoxon Mann‑Whitney
Pre‑training Post‑training signed rank test P‑valuea U test (∆)
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Intervention Control Intervention Control Intervention Control Effect
Outcome group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) P‑valueb size (r)
MoCA 18.21±3.87 16.79±4.19 19.02±4.23 17.11±4.54 0.003 0.014 0.041 0.331
FAB 10.84±4.25 8.74±4.57 11.95±4.03 9.21±4.98 0.001 0.068 0.008 0.429
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. aValues for within‑group comparisons; bvalues for between‑group (intervention group vs. control group)
comparisons. MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment, FAB, frontal assessment battery.
Table III. Secondary outcome measures.
Wilcoxon Mann‑Whitney
Pre‑training Post‑training signed rank test P‑valuea U test (∆)
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Intervention Control Intervention Control Intervention Control Effect
Outcome group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) group (n=19) P‑valueb size (r)
FMA‑LE 17.58±3.50 17.42±3.61 20.21±3.77 17.74±3.86 <0.001 0.034 <0.001 0.759
6MWT 41.47±12.28 38.84±11.62 71.42±14.97 52.16±16.16 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.797
(meters)
EQ–5D‑5L 0.78±0.04 0.77±0.04 0.81±0.41 0.78±0.05 0.002 0.128 0.011 0.41
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. aValues for within‑group comparisons; bvalues for between‑group (intervention group vs. control group)
comparisons. FMA‑LE, Fugl‑Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity; 6MWT, six‑minute walk test; EQ‑5D‑5L, European Quality of Life‑5
Dimension‑5 Level.
NGUYEN and PHAM: A EROBIC EXERCISE AND COGNITIVE TRAINING FOR POST‑STROKE MCI
6
Aerobic exercise positively enhances cognitive perfor
mance in patients who have suffered a stroke, both in general
cognitive function as measured using the MoCA scale and in
specic cognitive domains, including concentration, attention,
visual‑spatial and executive function (18,21,22,23)..The nd
ings of the present study are also partly in accordance with the
results of previous studies (13,21,22,23). The ndings indicate
that combined aerobic exercise can help patients enhance
general cognitive function and improves executive function,
as assessed using FAB. In addition, aerobic exercise can regu‑
late angiogenic and neurotropic growth factors, which likely
facilitate neurogenesis, angiogenesis and synaptic plasticity.
Aerobic exercise combined with cognitive exercise likely has
synergistic or complementary effects on cognition at both
the neurobiological and behavioral levels (17,20). The present
study illustrated that the intervention of aerobic exercise
exerted a synergistic effect on improving cognitive function in
patients who had suffered a stroke.
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for
the MoCA score in patients who have suffered a stroke is esti‑
mated to range from 1.22 to 2.15, based on both anchor‑based
and distribution‑based methods (24). In the present study, the
changes in MoCA scores before and after the intervention for
each group were as follows: Intervention group, from 18.21
to 19.02; difference=0.81); control group, from 16.79 to 17.11;
difference=0.32). Neither group exceeded the MCID according
to both methods. It was deemed that the small sample size was
a limitation. Furthermore, the participants had MCI, which
may explain the limited change in the MoCA scores.
Aerobic intervention led to multiple positive
outcomes simultaneously. The difference from previous
studies (18,21,22), is that the present study evaluated various
outcomes related to physical health and quality of life. The
results indicated significant improvements in both motor
function and endurance in patients who have suffered a
stroke following aerobic intervention, as assessed using the
FMA‑LE and 6MWT. Yeh et al (21) conducted a similar
study with 56 patients assigned to three groups: Aerobic
exercise, cognitive exercise and a combination of aerobic
and cognitive exercise. The of their study results revealed
improvements in endurance and mobility (6MWT); however,
their study did not evaluate quality of life, daily functioning,
or social engagement (21). Yeh et al (21) suggested that
sequential training may improve both general and specic
cognitive domains, although the effects were insufcient to
transfer to activities of daily living, quality of life or social
participation. A previous systematic review suggested that
cognitive improvements appeared to be limited to trained
cognitive functions and do not generalize to activities of daily
living (25)..It was hypothesized that, once the aerobic effects
are achieved at the neurobiological level, they not only have
a synergistic effect on cognitive function, but also on other
domains, specically physical function and daily living func
tions. The results of the present study support this hypothesis.
Incorporating aerobic exercise was shown to improve cogni
tive function, lower limb function, mobility and endurance,
which, in turn enhances quality of life. Quality of life was
assessed using the EQ‑5D‑5L instrument, which measures
ve dimensions. Improvements were observed in two of these
dimensions: Mobility and usual daily activities.
The present study has several limitations which should
be mentioned. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small,
which limits generalizability and may have been inuenced
by various confounding factors. The present study involved an
unequal sex distribution between the two groups. Considering
that this is an intervention study incorporating physical
activity, the sex imbalance may have inuenced both the inter
vention process and the outcomes. Future research with larger
sample sizes is thus required, along with the further explora
tion of how patient characteristics may affect the results of
the intervention. Secondly, the cognitive training conducted
on paper may have more limitations compared to similar
studies conducted on computers. Lastly, the present study only
evaluated the outcomes at the end of the intervention. The
present study did not monitor or assess whether the effects of
the sequential training could be maintained over time. This
remains an unknown factor that warrants further investigation.
When comparing the findings of the present study with
those of previous studies (18,21,22), it was observed that while
these studies support the combined approach of cognitive and
physical training, the present study differs in several ways: It
focused on older adults, utilized a paper‑based cognitive inter
vention instead of a computer‑based program, and implemented
a 4‑week hospital program followed by 8 weeks of home‑based
intervention, rather than a 12‑week hospital‑based program.
These modications were made to better align with practical
intervention programs commonly available at most healthcare
facilities, as numerous patients may nd it difcult to adhere to
a 3‑month hospital program. The home‑based approach, with
monitoring, helps patients establish a routine that can be main
tained after the intervention ends. Nevertheless, similar ndings
in cognitive and physical outcomes highlight the consistency of
the combined training approach across various settings.
In conclusion, MCI following a stroke is prevalent and
significantly affects the recovery of patients. The present
study found that a sequential combination of aerobic and
cognitive exercise improved general cognitive function and
frontal lobe executive function, physical function and quality
of life. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are
required to investigate the factors inuencing the effectiveness
of intervention in order for patients with MCI to fully benet
from the intervention.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from
the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
TNAN and VMP were involved in the conception and design
of the study, and performed the statistical analysis of the data.
WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JOURNAL 7: 39, 2025 7
TNAN and VMP were involved in the investigative aspects of
the study. TNAN and VMP were involved in the interpretation
of the data. TNAN and VMP were involved in the writing of
original draft of the manuscript, and the writing, reviewing
and editing of the manuscript. Both authors read and agreed
to the published version of the manuscript. TNAN and VMP
conrm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by Hanoi Medical
University under Decision No. 3963/QĐ‑ĐHYHN, dated
September 26, 2022 and Hanoi Medical University
Institutional Ethical Review Board under Decision No.
1259/GCN‑HDDDNCYSH‑DHYHN, dated May 7, 2024. All
patients provided a written consent to participate in this study.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Seshadri S and Wolf PA: Lifetime risk of stroke and dementia:
Current concepts, and estimates from the Framingham Study.
Lancet Neurol 6: 1106‑1114, 2007.
2. Skolarus LE, Burke JF, Brown DL and Freedman VA:
Understanding stroke survivorship: Expanding the concept of
poststroke disability. Stroke 45: 224‑230, 2014.
3. Mellon L, Brewer L, Hall P, Horgan F, Williams D and Hickey A;
ASPIRE‑S study group: Cognitive impairment six months after
ischaemic stroke: A profile from the ASPIRE‑S study. BMC
Neurol 15: 31, 2015.
4. Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, Pohjasvaara T, Kaste M,
Erkinjuntti T and Hietanen M: Post‑stroke cognitive impair
ment was common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur
J Neurol 22: 1288‑1294, 2015.
5. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Warena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC,
Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, et al: Guidelines for adult
stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare
professionals from the American heart Association/American
stroke association. Stroke 47: e98‑e169, 2016.
6. Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, Rossi B, Stemmer B and
Van Heugten CM: Cognitive rehabilitation. Gilhus NE,
Barnes MP and Brainin M (eds). In: European Handbook of
Neurological Management. 2nd edition. Wiley‑Blackwell,
Oxford, pp545‑568, 2011.
7. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN).
Management of Patients with Stroke: Rehabilitation, Prevention
and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning,
SIGN Publication 118, 2010.
8. Gillespie DC, Bowen A, Chung CS, Cockburn J, Knapp P and
Pollock A: Rehabilitation for post‑stroke cognitive impairment:
An overview of recommendations arising from systematic
reviews of current evidence. Clin Rehabil 29: 120‑128, 2015.
9. Starovasnik Žagavec B, Mlinaric Lešnik V and Goljar N:
Training of selective attention in work‑active stroke patients. Int
J Rehabil Res 38: 370, 2015.
10. Lin ZC, Tao J, Gao YL, Yin DZ, Chen AZ and Chen LD: Analysis
of central mechanism of cognitive training on cognitive impair‑
ment after stroke: Resting‑state functional magnetic resonance
imaging study. J Int Med Res 42: 659‑668, 2014.
11. Cumm ing TB, Tyedi n K, Churilov L, Morr is ME and Bernhardt J:
The effect of physical activity on cognitive function after stroke:
A systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 24: 557‑567, 2012.
12. Laurin D, Verreault R, Lindsay J, MacPherson K and
Rockwood K: Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment
and dementia in elderly persons. Arch Neurol 58: 498‑504, 2001.
13. Zheng G, Zhou W, Xia R, Tao J and Chen L: Aerobic exercises for
cognition rehabilitation following stroke: A systematic review.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25: 2780‑2789, 2016.
14. Barber SE, Clegg AP and Young JB: Was there a role for physical
activity in preventing cognitive decline in people with mild
cognitive impairment? Age Ageing 41: 5‑8, 2012.
15. Langdon KD and Corbett D: Improved working memory
following novel combinations of physical and cognitive activity.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26: 523‑532, 2012.
16. Oswald WD, Gunzelmann T, Rupprecht R and Hagen B:
Differential effects of single versus combined cognitive and
physical training with older adults: The SimA study in a 5‑year
perspective. Eur J Ageing 3: 179‑1792, 2006.
17. Law LLF, Barnett F, Yau MK and Gray MA: Effects of combined
cognitive and exercise interventions on cognition in older adults
with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review.
Ageing Res Rev 15: 61‑75, 2014.
18. Bo W, Lei M, Tao S, Jie LT, Qian L, Lin FQ and Ping WX:
Effects of combined intervention of physical exercise and
cognitive training on cognitive function in stroke survivors with
vascular cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial.
Clin Rehabil 33: 54‑63, 2019.
19. Additive effects of physical exercise and environmental enrich
ment on adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice‑PubMed.
Accessed September 23, 2022.
20. Labban JD and Etnier JL: Effects of acute exercise on long‑term
memory. Res Q Exerc Sport 82: 712‑721, 2011.
21. Yeh TT, Chang KC, Wu CY, Chen CJ and Chuang IC: Clinical
efficacy of aerobic exercise combined with computer‑based
cognitive training in stroke: A multicenter randomized controlled
trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 29: 255‑264, 2022.
22. Yeh TT, Chang KC and Wu CY: The active ingredient of cogni‑
tive restoration: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of
sequential combination of aerobic exercise and Computer‑based
cognitive training in stroke survivors with cognitive decline.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 100: 821‑827, 2019.
23. Marzolini S, Oh P, McIlroy W and Brooks D: The effects of
an aerobic and resistance exercise training program on cogni
tion following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27: 392‑402,
2013.
24. Wu CY, Hung SJ, Lin K, Chen KH, Chen P and Tsay PK:
Responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference, and
validity of the MoCA in stroke rehabilitation. Occup The r
Int 2019: 2517658, 2019.
25. Lauenroth A, Ioannidis AE and Teichmann B: Influence of
combined physical and cognitive training on cognition: A
systematic review. BMC Geriatr 16: 141, 2016.
Copyright © 2025 Nguyen and Pham. This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International (CC BY 4.0) License.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The objectives are to evaluate the effects of a sequential combination of aerobic exercise and cognitive training, compared with exercise or cognitive training alone, on cognitive function, physical function, daily function, quality of life, and social participation in stroke survivors with cognitive impairment. Methods This is a single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 56) were randomly assigned to aerobic exercise training (n = 18), computerized cognitive training (n = 18), and the sequential combination of aerobic exercise and computerized cognitive training (n = 20) group. All groups underwent training 60 min/day, 3 days/week, for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcomes included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition, and the Stroop color-word test. Secondary outcomes were the Timed Up and Go test, 6-Minute Walk Test, Functional Independence Measure, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and Stroke Impact Scale. Results 56 participants completed the trial. Compared with a single type of aerobic exercise or cognitive training, the combined training group showed significant improvement in MoCA (P < .05, η2 = 0.13), and two sub-tests in WMS-III (both P’s < 0.05) following the intervention. However, no between-group differences were observed for physical functions, daily function, quality of life, and social participation measures. Conclusions The findings provide evidence for the potential synergistic intervention in stroke survivors. Future studies investigating the transfer effects and the optimal training parameters with a larger sample is needed.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Persons with stroke frequently suffer from cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a recently developed screening tool, is sensitive to poststroke cognitive deficits. The present study assessed its psychometric and clinimetric properties (i.e., responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and criterion validity) in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapy. Method: The MoCA and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were administered to 65 stroke survivors before and after 4 to 5 weeks of therapy. The effect size and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated for responsiveness. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MCID. Criterion validity was measured with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The responsiveness of the MoCA was moderate (SRM = 0.67). Participants exceeding the MCID according to the anchor- and distribution-based approaches were 33 (50.77%) and 20 (30.77%), respectively. Fair to good concurrent validity was reported between the MoCA and the SIS communication subscale. The MoCA had satisfactory predictive validity with the SIS communication and memory subscales. Conclusion: This study may support the responsiveness, MCID, and criterion validity of the MoCA in stroke populations. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the current findings.
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study evaluated the possible effect of the combined intervention of physical exercise and cognitive training on cognitive function in stroke survivals with vascular cognitive impairment. Design A single-blind (investigator-blinded but not subject-blinded) randomized controlled trial. Setting Medical Rehabilitation Center of Shanghai General Hospital, China. Subjects A total of 225 patients (mean age 64.59 years, SD = 4.27) who exhibited vascular cognitive impairment were included in this study. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated into one of the four groups: (1) physical exercise (n = 56; 50-minute session), (2) cognitive training (n = 57; 60-minute session), (3) combined intervention of physical exercise and cognitive training (n = 55; 50-minute session + 60-minute session), or (4) control groups (n = 57; 45-minute session). All participants received training for 36 sessions, three days per week, for 12 weeks. Primary measures Measures were recorded at baseline, after the intervention and at a six-month follow-up. Primary measurements included the Trail Making Part B, Stroop, forward digit span, and mental rotation tests. Results A total of 179 participants (79.56% response rate) completed the study. Cognitive performances on all four tasks in the combined training group improved significantly after the intervention (P < 0.01). Changes in cognitive performance were greater in the combined intervention group than those in the physical exercise group (e.g. forward digit span, 13.61% vs. 2.18%, P = 0.003), the cognitive training group (e.g. mental rotation, 17.36% vs. 0.87%, P = 0.002), and the control group (e.g. Stroop, −4.11% vs. −0.72%, P = 0.026). Conclusion The combined intervention produced greater benefits on cognitive function compared to either training alone in stroke survivors with vascular cognitive impairment.
Article
Full-text available
Background Numerous daily activities require simultaneous application of motor and cognitive skills (dual-tasking). The execution of such tasks is especially difficult for the elderly and for people with (neuro-) degenerative disorders. Training of physical and cognitive abilities helps prevent or slow down the age-related decline of cognition. The aim of this review is to summarise and assess the role of combined physical-and-cognitive-training characteristics in improving cognitive performance and to propose an effective training scheme within the frame of a suitable experimental design. Methods A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in selected databases. The following criteria were compulsory for inclusion in the study: 1. A (Randomized) Controlled Trial (RCT or CT) design; 2. Implementation of combined physical and cognitive training, either simultaneously (dual task) or subsequently - at least one hour per weekly over four weeks or more; 3. Cognitive outcomes as a study’s endpoint. Results Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria. It appears that either simultaneous or subsequently combined physical and cognitive training is more successful compared to single physical or single cognitive exercise. Training characteristics like length, frequency, duration, intensity and level of task difficulty seem to determine cognitive performance. However, the articles show that cognitive improvement seems to remain somewhat confined to trained cognitive functions rather than generalising to other cognitive or daily-living skills. Conclusion Due to methodological heterogeneity among studies, results need to be treated with caution. We critically discuss the role of training characteristics and propose a potentially effective training intervention within an appropriate experimental design.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. Methods: Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Results: Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation and underlie this entire guideline. Without communication and coordination, isolated efforts to rehabilitate the stroke survivor are unlikely to achieve their full potential. Conclusions: As systems of care evolve in response to healthcare reform efforts, postacute care and rehabilitation are often considered a costly area of care to be trimmed but without recognition of their clinical impact and ability to reduce the risk of downstream medical morbidity resulting from immobility, depression, loss of autonomy, and reduced functional independence. The provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resources, dose, and duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priority in these redesign efforts.
Article
Full-text available
Cognitive impairment commonly occurs in the acute phase post-stroke, but may persist with over half of all stroke survivors experiencing some form of long-term cognitive deficit. Recent evidence suggests that optimising secondary prevention adherence is a critical factor in preventing recurrent stroke and the incidence of stroke-related cognitive impairment and dementia. The aim of this study was to profile cognitive impairment of stroke survivors at six months, and to identify factors associated with cognitive impairment post-stroke, focusing on indicators of adequate secondary prevention and psychological function. Participants were assessed at six months following an ischaemic stroke as part of the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke study (ASPIRE-S), which examined the secondary preventive and rehabilitative profile of patients in the community post-stroke. Cognitive impairment was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Two-hundred and fifty-six stroke patients were assessed at six months. Over half of the sample (56.6%) were found to have cognitive impairment, with significant associations between cognitive impairment and female sex (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.57) and history of cerebrovascular disease (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.38-3.59). Treatment with antihypertensive medications (OR = .65, 95% CI .44-.96) and prescription of anticoagulant therapy (OR = .41, 95% CI .26-.68) were associated with reduced likelihood of cognitive impairment, however increasing number of total prescribed medications was moderately associated with poorer cognitive impairment (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.19). Findings reveal levels of cognitive impairment at 6 months post-stroke that are concerning. Encouragingly, aspects of secondary prevention were identified that may be protective in reducing the incidence of cognitive impairment post-stroke. Neuropsychological rehabilitation post-stroke is also required as part of stroke rehabilitation models to meet the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Article
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a sequential combination of aerobic exercise and cognitive training on cognitive function and other health-related outcomes in stroke survivors with cognitive decline. Design: Intervention study and randomized controlled trial. Setting: Hospital-based rehabilitation units. Participants: Survivors of stroke with cognitive decline (N=30) were randomized to sequential combination training (SEQ) (n=15) or an active control (n=15) group. Interventions: The SEQ group received 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, followed by 30 minutes of computerized cognitive training. The control group received 30 minutes of nonaerobic physical exercise, followed by 30 minutes of unstructured mental activities. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was cognitive function. Secondary outcome measures included physical function, social participation, and quality of life. Results: Compared with the control group, the SEQ group had significantly improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (P=.03) and Wechsler Memory Scale span scores (P=.012) after training. The endurance and mobility level measured by the 6-minute walk test (P=.25) was also enhanced in the SEQ group relative to the control group. However, the transfer of sequential training to social participation (Community Integration Questionnaire) and quality of life (EuroQoL questionnaire) was limited (P>.05 for both). Conclusions: Aerobic exercise combined with computerized cognitive training has better effects on the cognitive functional status of survivors of stroke than an active control. The cognitive functional status of stroke survivors was better after participation in aerobic exercise combined with computerized training than after active control therapy, demonstrating the clinical significance of this combination therapy.
Article
Background: Cognitive impairments are highly prevalent in stroke survivors and can substantially affect their physical rehabilitation and quality of life. The management of these impairments currently remains limited, but increasing studies reported the effect of aerobic exercise on cognitive performance in patients suffering from stroke. The purpose of this review was to assess the effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function following stroke. Methods: Seven electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database [VIP], Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc [CBM], Science Citation Index [SCI], EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched from their inception to May 31, 2015, for the effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive ability compared to usual physical activity in stroke survivors. RevMan V5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre) was used to analyze the data and to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Ten eligible studies including 394 participants were identified. Six studies showed that aerobic exercise significantly improved global cognitive ability in stroke survivors. Four studies reported aerobic exercise to be beneficial in improving memory, but only one showed statistical significance. Two studies investigated the effects of aerobic exercise on attention, and one showed a significant improvement. One study reported a significant benefit of aerobic exercise on visuospatial ability in stroke survivors. No adverse events were reported in the included studies. Conclusions: Aerobic exercise may have a positive effect on improving global cognitive ability and a potential benefit on memory, attention, and the visuospatial domain of cognition in stroke survivors. However, further large, rigorously designed trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Article
The aim was to examine the effects of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation of attention in work-active patients after stroke. The study included 11 patients treated as inpatients at the University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, who were included in intensive selective attention training four times a week for 3 months. Each patient was assessed at the initial and the final rehabilitation stage with the TAP system (Test of Attentional Performance), alertness, and divided attention tasks. The results indicate a moderate to strong increase in performance on the divided attention test and a mild effect on the alertness test. Early cognitive rehabilitation of the attentional system can contribute toward recovery of divided attention in work-active patients after stroke.
Article
Cognitive impairment is common after stroke, but the prevalence and long-term significance of the diverse neuropsychological deficits on functional outcome are still not well known. The frequency and prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive impairments were investigated in a large cohort of ischaemic stroke patients. Consecutive patients (n = 409), aged 55-85 years, from the acute stroke unit of the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, were evaluated with extensive clinical and neuropsychological assessments 3 months post-stroke. Impairments within nine cognitive domains were determined according to age-appropriate normative data from a random healthy population. Functional disability was evaluated with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) 3 and 15 months post-stroke. In all, 83% patients showed impairment in at least one cognitive domain, whereas 50% patients were impaired in multiple (≥3) domains. In cases with excellent clinical recovery at 3 months (mRS = 0-1, no disability), the occurrence of any cognitive impairment was 71%. Memory, visuoconstructional and executive functions were most commonly impaired. A substantially smaller proportion of patients scored below the conventional or more stringent cut-offs in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Domain-specific cognitive impairments were associated with functional dependence at 15 months regardless of stroke severity and other confounders. Cognitive impairment as evaluated with a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment is prevalent in stroke survivors even with successful clinical recovery. Typically multiple domains and complex cognitive abilities are affected. MMSE is not sensitive in detecting these symptoms. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is strongly related to poor functional outcome. © 2015 EAN.