Content uploaded by Yujia Zhu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Yujia Zhu on Feb 16, 2025
Content may be subject to copyright.
*Corresponding Author’s Email: yujia.zhu@sofia.edu
Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Management and Economics
Vol. 2, Issue. 1, 2025, pp. 17-36
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33422/imeconf.v2i1.845
Copyright © 2025 Author(s)
ISSN: 3030-0282 online
Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through
Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in Solo-
Founder AI-Driven Nonprofits Mode (SFADNM)
Yujia Zhu
Sofia University, United States
Abstract
The Solo Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit Mode (SFADNM) is a pioneering operational model
that leverages artificial intelligence to address traditional challenges within the nonprofit sector,
such as resource limitations, dependency on external funding, and scalability barriers. By
adopting SFADNM, a single founder can lead a nonprofit without relying on extensive staff,
financial support, or physical infrastructure, creating a lean, mission-centered organization.
This model enables automation in essential functions, including user engagement,
administrative tasks, and resource allocation, allowing founders to focus on strategic mission-
aligned goals. Unlike conventional nonprofits, SFADNM facilitates sustainability by
eliminating funding dependencies, thus creating an efficient, AI-powered structure that
enhances reach and adaptability. A case study of FASSLING, an AI product line of the
Canadian nonprofit For A Safer Space (FASS), was used to explore the efficacy of SFADNM
to deliver personalized support services globally, offering a novel pathway for social
entrepreneurs to maximize societal impact independently. This paper provides insights into
how AI integration can redefine nonprofit operations by fostering mission-driven innovation
without traditional financial dependencies, showcasing a sustainable alternative for mission-
focused organizations.
Keywords: AI-driven nonprofit, solo founder, nonprofit innovation, social entrepreneurship,
nonprofit scalability
1. Introduction
Traditional nonprofit organizations face an array of challenges, primarily centered around
resource and workforce limitations. A pervasive issue is the chronic shortage of funding,
which significantly restricts their capacity to expand operations and meet growing service
demands. This financial constraint has been intensified by a decline in individual and
foundation giving, leaving many nonprofits struggling to do more with less (Cummings,
2013). Resource allocation dilemmas are particularly evident in organizations that must
balance the provision of direct services with advocacy efforts, as seen in nonprofits
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
15
addressing food insecurity (Woolley, 2024). Staffing challenges, including high employee
turnover and the pressure to maintain a dual bottom line—fulfilling mission-driven goals
while ensuring financial sustainability, further complicate nonprofit management
(Cummings, 2013; Light, 2004). The nonprofit workforce often operates under self-
exploitative conditions, driven to accomplish more with limited resources until it reaches
unsustainable workloads (Light, 2004).
Governance and leadership issues add another layer of complexity, as many nonprofits are
led by small, sometimes insular boards that may resist the strategic innovations required for
growth (Crockwell, 2015; Woolley, 2024). Additionally, the sector faces heightened scrutiny
and performance expectations from both the public and regulatory bodies, demanding greater
transparency and accountability (Light, 2004; Madden & Scaife, 2005). To address these
multifaceted challenges, calls for capacity-building measures have grown, emphasizing
investments in technology, staff training, and strategic planning as essential for improving
nonprofit effectiveness and restoring public trust (Light, 2004). Funding, donations, and
volunteer labor are critical for nonprofit sustainability, allowing organizations to mobilize
resources effectively and engage stakeholders through emotional storytelling (McKeever,
2024). Volunteers are particularly significant, often enabling nonprofits to deliver services at
reduced costs or even for free, thus enhancing both economic efficiency and organizational
commitment (Handy & Brudney, 2007).
Despite the professionalization of the nonprofit workforce and a shift towards paid labor,
volunteers remain indispensable, especially in mission-aligned activities where their altruistic
motives enhance organizational effectiveness—a factor highly valued by donors assessing
nonprofit impact (Beck et al., 2021). While concerns persist that government spending might
crowd out private donations and volunteer efforts, these contributions remain vital, filling
gaps left by government services (Bredtmann, 2016). Effective volunteer management is
crucial for nonprofit sustainability, as it alleviates budgetary constraints and enhances
organizational capacity (El-Amin, 2023). The degree to which organizations invest in
volunteer management varies, based on factors such as size, age, and the presence of paid
staff, with those valuing volunteers more likely to allocate resources for their engagement
(Handy et al., 2006). In summary, the nonprofit sector’s dependence on funding, donations,
and volunteer labor reflects a complex interplay of economic necessity, mission alignment,
and strategic management, essential for delivering critical social services and achieving a
collective societal impact (Tiwari & Clotfelter, 1994).
This analysis introduces a novel concept I developed: the “Solo Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit
Mode” (SFADNM), a pioneering model in which a single founder (creator) leverages
artificial intelligence to operate a nonprofit organization effectively. No publication has
previously discussed this model, let alone applied it within the nonprofit sector. This concept
marks a historic first in both the business and academic worlds. In this framework, AI is
employed across critical functions such as resource management, service delivery, impact
scaling, and mission alignment, enabling the founder to focus on high-level decision-making,
strategy, and mission integrity. In contrast to traditional nonprofits, which rely on extensive
staff, volunteers, and funding, this approach leverages AI to automate routine tasks, optimize
operations, and extend outreach without financial dependency on donations, investments, or
grants. Notably, there is currently no publication or research exploring AI as the sole support
system for a solo-founder nonprofit, positioning SFADNM at the forefront of nonprofit
innovation.
The primary objective of SFADNM is to evaluate its viability as a sustainable and scalable
alternative to conventional nonprofit models. Specifically, it seeks to determine if a solo
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
16
individual, fully supported by AI, can manage a nonprofit capable of delivering high-impact
services without requiring extensive funding, personnel, or physical infrastructure. By
examining the model’s feasibility, one can assess whether it could serve as a blueprint for
mission-driven organizations aiming for a more resource-efficient and financially
independent operational structure. This model redefines efficiency in nonprofit operations by
using AI to manage essential tasks traditionally performed by multiple employees, including
administrative duties, data analysis, user engagement, and personalized support. AI’s
continuous operation enables the nonprofit to uphold a high service standard and respond
promptly to audience needs. Consequently, the founder can concentrate on strategic
initiatives, mission alignment, and high-level decisions while AI manages routine
responsibilities, significantly reducing operational costs and time limitations.
Sustainability within SFADNM is also reconceptualized, as the nonprofit operates without
financial dependencies. By eliminating the need for donations, grants, or investments, the
founder circumvents traditional funding challenges, creating an organization that sustains
itself through AI efficiency rather than external resources. This approach challenges existing
nonprofit notions of financial sustainability, demonstrating that impactful social services can
indeed be scaled without reliance on monetary contributions.
In sum, the SFADNM seeks to determine if a solo founder supported by AI can achieve and
exceed the impact typically associated with larger, resource-intensive nonprofits. By
redefining efficiency and sustainability, this model envisions a future for nonprofits in which
technology empowers mission-driven individuals to expand their impact independently,
sustainably, and in alignment with their social purpose.
2. Methodology
This paper adopts a concept exploration approach utilizing the case study of For A Safer
Space (FASS) and its AI product line, FASSLING, as the primary investigative framework.
The research methodology integrates qualitative analysis and theoretical exploration to
examine the efficacy and transformative potential of the Solo Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit
Mode (SFADNM). FASS is the first nonprofit/organization in this world to adopt this model.
By focusing on this innovative operational model, which leverages artificial intelligence (AI)
to overcome traditional challenges in the nonprofit sector, the study explores how scalability,
resource dependency, and accessibility barriers can be effectively addressed. This approach
allows for an in-depth analysis of the model’s unique attributes and its implications for
nonprofit management.
The research is structured around a single case study methodology to provide comprehensive
insights into the operational dynamics and outcomes of the SFADNM model. The
FASSLING AI product line serves as a critical example of how AI can be integrated into
nonprofit operations, offering a real-world application of the concept under investigation. The
case study method is particularly suited to exploring the complex interplay between AI
technologies and mission alignment, as it allows the researcher to delve into the specific
details of how this model functions in practice. By focusing on one detailed case, the study
highlights the practical and theoretical contributions of the SFADNM framework.
The analysis is guided by a conceptual framework that emphasizes three core dimensions:
scalability and efficiency, mission alignment, and sustainability. The first dimension explores
how AI enhances operational efficiency while extending the reach of nonprofit services to
diverse audiences. The second dimension examines how the operational strategies of the
SFADNM model align with the founder’s ethical and altruistic goals, ensuring that the
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
17
integrity of the mission remains intact. Finally, the third dimension evaluates the financial
independence and adaptability of the model, particularly in its ability to operate without
traditional funding dependencies. This framework provides a structured approach to
understanding the nuanced impacts of the SFADNM model on nonprofit operations.
The case study approach was selected for its ability to provide a detailed and nuanced
understanding of the SFADNM model’s real-world applications. Focusing on FASS’s
artificial intelligence product line, FASSLING, as a single case captures the intricacies of
implementing an AI-driven nonprofit model, while also enabling a critical analysis of its
broader implications. This aligns seamlessly with the exploratory nature of the study, which
aims to conceptualize and validate the SFADNM as an innovative and sustainable framework
within the nonprofit sector. By combining theoretical exploration with practical application,
this methodology demonstrates how AI can redefine nonprofit operations, fostering mission-
driven innovation and offering a scalable alternative to traditional funding-dependent
structures.
3. Concept and Discussion
3.1 Contextual Background
Nonprofit organizations confront a range of systemic challenges that significantly impede
their operational efficiency and long-term sustainability, largely due to issues related to
gatekeeping, financial dependency, and administrative burden. A primary concern is funding
precarity; resources are often unpredictable and insufficient, complicating efforts to scale
operations and achieve sustainable growth (Caramidaru & Ionica, 2021). The funding
instability is further aggravated by neoliberal shifts that assign nonprofits roles traditionally
held by the state—such as literacy programs—without proportional financial support,
creating a paradox of promoting self-reliance while keeping these organizations financially
constrained (Gallagher et al., 2024). Governance challenges also persist, since nonprofits
frequently lack the robust internal and external control mechanisms that for-profit entities
maintain, leading to inefficiencies and heightened risks that are particularly evident during
crises like the COVID-19 pandemic (Molk & Sokol, 2020).
Administrative overhead presents an additional obstacle, as nonprofits must optimize limited
resources while maintaining effective program delivery and managing human resources. This
challenge is particularly acute for community-based organizations with broad mandates that
face capacity issues in governance, leadership, and financial management (Crockwell, 2015).
Furthermore, the competitive environment for funding necessitates collaborative efforts
among agencies, which, while beneficial, can also heighten administrative demands and
compel nonprofits to adapt strategically to evolving business models (Smith & Phillips,
2016). Nonprofit leadership and management skills are critical for navigating these complex
and dynamic environments, underscoring the need for competency in these areas to achieve
sustained effectiveness (Domiter & Marciszewska, 2018; Matsimbi & Mtapuri, 2014).
Addressing such multifaceted challenges necessitates innovative strategies for sustainability,
including diversifying funding sources, strengthening governance frameworks, and enhancing
leadership and management capacities (Matsimbi & Mtapuri, 2014; Sontag-Padilla et al.,
2012). This context points to the urgent need for disruptive models to redefine nonprofit
operations sustainably. Reliance on philanthropic and governmental funding is increasingly
unsustainable, especially in economic downturns, thus limiting the financial stability and
mission-driven impact of nonprofits. The application of social entrepreneurial principles in
nonprofit models has shown the potential to mitigate such challenges (Stecker, 2014). The
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
18
COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these pressures, elevating demand for services while
simultaneously curtailing fundraising efforts. These constraints are compounded by shifts in
financial practices, such as a move toward cashless transactions among younger donors and
fluctuating public policies affecting nonprofit operations (Steenburg et al., 2022). The
integration of digital technology remains a significant challenge; many nonprofits lack both
the digital infrastructure and knowledge needed to create value and communicate effectively
within the context of the fourth industrial revolution (Said, 2018).
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a transformative solution to these
challenges by efficiently automating tasks traditionally managed by large teams, such as
client support, data analysis, and resource allocation. AI-driven automation including
chatbots and virtual assistants enables nonprofits to streamline customer service, allowing
human agents to focus on more complex tasks, and thus improving engagement and
satisfaction (R. Kumar et al., 2024; Pendy, 2023). AI’s ability to process large datasets
through machine learning and natural language processing allows for rapid, data-driven
decision making, optimizing workflows and enabling nonprofits to allocate resources more
effectively (Masimov, 2024). AI-driven task management systems further enhance teamwork
efficiency by automating routine assignments and offering predictive insights (Masimov,
2024).
The Solo-Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit Model (SFADNM) that I invented represents a
pioneering approach that leverages AI as the primary operational framework. Under this
innovative model, a solo founder directs the mission while AI performs essential tasks
typically managed by a full team. AI’s capabilities in automating routine tasks, such as
scheduling, data management, and internal communications, significantly reduce the
founder’s workload, enabling them to concentrate on mission-critical activities. This
approach minimizes operating costs by eliminating the need for extensive support staff and
physical office space, creating a lean yet impactful operational structure. The Canadian
registered nonprofit, For A Safer Space (FASS), is the first organization to adopt this model.
As the solo founder of FASS, I invented this innovative management model, and it has been
working well since its adoption.
A distinctive advantage of the SFADNM model is its scalability. Unlike traditional
nonprofits, which require increased staff and funding for expansion, an AI-driven model
enables greater reach without corresponding cost escalation. AI-driven chatbots and virtual
assistants allow for around-the-clock, personalized user engagement, ensuring a responsive
and mission-aligned user experience. This scalable approach empowers the founder to expand
the nonprofit’s reach, even in scenarios such as disaster relief, where rapid response is
critical. AI’s adaptability further enhances the model with systems that learn from user
interactions and feedback, thereby continually improving service quality without requiring
extensive retraining or restructuring.
Ultimately, the SFADNM challenges traditional staffing and funding paradigms within the
nonprofit sector. This AI-supported framework offers an alternative for founders who
prioritize mission impact over financial dependency, showcasing a sustainable path for high-
impact nonprofit work in today’s digital era. By enabling extensive reach and mission
alignment with minimal resources, this model has the potential to redefine scalability and
operational efficiency for the nonprofit sector, inspiring mission-driven leaders to harness AI
as an integral component of their organizational structure. I further believe that it is the most
effective solution to nonprofit industrial complex so far.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
19
3.2 Core Components of Running a Nonprofit Alone With Artificial Intelligence
The advantages of a streamlined vision under solo-founder management are significant,
primarily reflected in enhanced decision-making efficiency and strategic alignment. Founders
are often uniquely positioned to leverage their decision rights, resulting in improved
operational performance and transparency, thus more effectively increasing firm value
compared to non-founder firms. This advantage is achieved by selecting inputs that bolster
gross margins in differentiated firms and asset usage efficiency in cost-leadership firms, as
well as by maintaining high levels of transparency (Hsu et al., 2023). Founder-led governance
structures typically minimize agency costs due to the reduced separation between ownership
and control, facilitating more efficient governance and decision-making (Donoher, 2009).
Although concerns exist that a rapidly growing firm may surpass a founder’s managerial
capacity, evidence indicates that founder-led firms can adapt to increased complexity while
maintaining similar growth and profitability levels as firms managed by professional
executives (Willard et al., 1992). However, the autonomy of a single founder can introduce
governance challenges, such as the establishment of a passive board that fails to provide
critical oversight (Kormann & Suberg, 2021). In summary, a solo-founder model offers
strategic focus, reduced agency costs, and stable performance during growth but requires
attention to potential governance risks.
Mission alignment, even without a large management team, can be sustained through
strategic mechanisms across various contexts. Cross-functional collaboration fosters
communication and knowledge sharing among stakeholders, which promotes a unified
approach to decision making and mission alignment without extensive managerial oversight
(Elikwu, 2019). In contexts such as B Corp certification, embedding mission alignment into
human resource processes—such as recruitment and employee engagement—ensures that all
employees are committed to the organization’s goals, thereby reducing the need for a large
management team to enforce alignment (Paelman et al., 2022). Similarly, aligning revenue
sources with organizational missions, as seen in nonprofit organizations, enhances mission
focus, potentially mitigating mission drift (Ma et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018). In complex
fields like wildfire management, mission alignment faces challenges from intergovernmental
relationships; however, proactive collaboration and mutual understanding can reduce
conflicts, lessening reliance on a large management team (Fleming et al., 2015). Collectively,
these findings highlight that cross-functional collaboration, mission-centered HR practices,
and aligned revenue sources effectively support mission alignment, even in the absence of an
extensive managerial structure.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has proven effective across several critical operational areas,
including customer service, content creation, feedback analysis, and data management. In
customer service, AI technologies such as chatbots and virtual assistants revolutionize
support and engagement by providing personalized, on-demand assistance, thereby enhancing
customer satisfaction and reducing response times (Deepa & Abirami, 2024; Echegu, 2024;
Negi, 2023; Wilson et al., 2024). AI’s capacity to automate routine tasks and predict
customer needs enables more efficient customer relationship management, offering
businesses tailored experiences and proactive engagement (Echegu, 2024; Wilson et al.,
2024). In marketing, AI optimizes operations through content creation, audience
segmentation, and programmatic advertising, increasing campaign effectiveness (Todorova &
Antonova, 2023). Feedback analysis benefits similarly, as AI delivers insights into user
behavior and satisfaction, refining customer experience initiatives (Deepa & Abirami, 2024).
AI also plays a pivotal role in data management, facilitating the analysis of extensive data
sets, which enhances decision-making and operational efficiency (Negi, 2023). While AI
integration in these areas improves productivity and customer engagement, it simultaneously
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
20
introduces challenges related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and ethical practices (Echegu,
2024; Wilson et al., 2024).
AI-driven automation is increasingly transforming labor dynamics across sectors by replacing
tasks previously performed manually. AI is also prevalent in manufacturing, logistics, and
customer service, where it powers robots on assembly lines, manages warehouse operations,
and enhances customer interactions through chatbots (Jadhav & Banubakode, 2024). The gig
economy has been similarly transformed, with AI platforms assigning tasks to a global pool
of digital workers, a shift that offers flexibility but raises ethical concerns such as labor
alienation (Altenried, 2022). AI also automates functions like employment and demand
scheduling, which displaces traditional roles while creating opportunities for new decision-
making and prediction tasks (Sen & Patel, 2023). This dual impact of AI on labor illustrates
both the displacement of human roles and the need for workforce adaptation and reskilling in
an AI-driven job market.
Nonprofit organizations are increasingly incorporating AI into their workflows to enhance
efficiency and impact. AI is used to streamline essential processes such as program design,
resource management, and monitoring, maximizing operational effectiveness (Efthymiou et
al., 2023). Generative AI, which creates text, images, and other media, is particularly
valuable in the sector, underscoring its growing role in philanthropy. AI’s capabilities in
decision making and accuracy enable nonprofits to allocate resources more effectively,
thereby improving service delivery and outreach (Boles, 2013; Efthymiou et al., 2023).
However, AI implementation in nonprofits also brings challenges, such as ethical
considerations, regulatory needs, and the necessity for a leadership approach that emphasizes
humanity to ensure responsible AI use (Iskandarova & Sloan, 2023). Limited resources and
expertise also present barriers to AI integration (Boles, 2013). Despite these challenges, AI
offers significant potential to revolutionize nonprofit work, enhancing organizational
effectiveness and efficiency in advancing social missions (Boles, 2013; Efthymiou et al.,
2023).
3.3 Case Study: The Example of For A Safer Space and Its AI Product Line FASSLING
For A Safer Space (FASS), a federally registered nonprofit in Canada, has made history as
the world’s first nonprofit/charity organization to offer holistic human care services
24/7, 365 days a year, and the first to deliver all of these services exclusively through AI.
Utilizing the ChatGPT platform, I single-handedly developed 14 innovative AI products
under the product line FASSLING. One of the key advantages of designing AI products on
the ChatGPT platform is that it eliminates development costs, enabling the creation of
sophisticated AI software using their advanced models. This allowed me to establish and
operate a global-reaching nonprofit organization without relying on any funding, grants,
donations, or external investments. Furthermore, the sustainability of this model is
unparalleled: As long as ChatGPT and OpenAI exist, the AI services I designed will remain
operational. This ensures that FASS can continue providing its life-changing support
indefinitely, making it a model of sustainability in the nonprofit sector. As the sole founder,
creator, and volunteer at FASS, I have demonstrated that one person can run a global highly
impactful, AI-driven nonprofit organization. This approach not only challenges and disrupts
traditional nonprofit structures but also sets a new standard for leveraging technology to
deliver global-scale impact with minimal resources.
One of its AI products, FASSLING for emotional and coaching support, was created with a
vision of providing compassionate, non-therapy emotional support accessible without
financial transactions. Aimed at bridging gaps in mental and emotional well-being services,
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
21
FASSLING offers immediate, on-demand support for anyone, anywhere. As a high-impact,
scalable, and user-friendly AI-driven mini-program, it addresses key challenges within the
mental health landscape, including limited access, affordability, and the stigma surrounding
mental health care. FASSLING’s core mission is to make immediate emotional support
available to individuals facing financial, geographic, or social barriers to traditional therapy.
While professional mental health services require extensive resources and often involve long
waiting times, FASSLING provides empathetic listening, emotional and coaching support,
comfort, and resources instantly, employing AI to replicate compassionate human
interactions. This unique approach proves especially valuable for individuals in situational
distress, isolation, or those simply seeking a supportive space for self-expression. Since its
launch, the app has surpassed 1,000 users in under a month, marking a significant milestone
in its early success.
I envision FASSLING as an alternative to costly mental health support by offering a free,
unlimited, and judgment-free platform that meets users wherever they are. By encouraging
users to explore and manage their emotions with gentle AI guidance, FASSLING promotes
resilience and self-awareness in a world where supportive services are often scarce. Driven
by a belief that empathy and genuine support should not be commoditized, the founder – I
(the founder), undertook the development and maintenance of FASSLING independently,
eschewing funding or a large team. This approach reflects a philosophy grounded in altruism
and ethics: the conviction that services focused on human well-being should prioritize impact
over profit. By innovating within the nonprofit sector, FASSLING exemplifies how
meaningful support can be delivered without traditional resources, leveraging technology to
bridge accessibility gaps.
FASSLING’s development demonstrates that with AI, dedication, and a mission-focused
approach, impactful change is possible without the restrictions of conventional funding
models. This initiative exemplifies the power of moral conviction and resilience, showcasing
that high-quality support services can thrive through technological innovation and a steadfast
commitment to those in need, free from financial gain or organizational expansion pressures.
FASSLING’s suite of AI-driven services empowers users in various aspects of personal and
interpersonal well-being. Its flagship offering, FASSLING for Emotional and Coaching
Support, provides foundational guidance to help users navigate daily challenges, set personal
goals, and build resilience. The program also includes targeted services like Anti-Oppressive
Skills, which encourage users to challenge oppressive behaviors; and Advocacy Skills,
designed to empower users in supporting personal and social causes. Other offerings, like
FASSLING for Therapy Toolbox, deliver accessible therapeutic techniques and coping
strategies, providing users with practical tools to improve mental well-being. In addition,
Mediation and Conflict Resolution and Communication Skills equip users with the tools for
peaceful conflict resolution and effective interpersonal communication, respectively—skills
crucial for healthy, empathetic relationships. FASSLING’s Life Design Skills assist users in
creating goal-oriented plans aligned with personal values, while Relationship Harmony Skills
foster understanding, empathy, and open communication. For professional contexts,
Leadership Skills and Peer Support Skills offer foundational principles for inspiring,
motivating, and supporting others effectively. Crisis Management Skills, Self-Awareness
Skills, and Cultural Sensitivity Skills further enhance users’ abilities to regulate emotions,
reflect mindfully, and navigate cultural differences with respect and empathy. These services
embody FASSLING’s mission to make skill-building and emotional support accessible,
providing a comprehensive, stigma-free system for individuals seeking to strengthen their
emotional and interpersonal capacities through an AI-guided experience.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
22
Through AI, FASSLING reaches a diverse, global audience, making its services available
24/7 and transcending the barriers of traditional service models. By automating support
functions, FASSLING operates at scale without the need for substantial financial resources or
a large team. Its AI systems personalize interactions, adapting responses based on user inputs,
emotional states, and individual needs, and foster a meaningful connection with users
worldwide. FASSLING’s scalability is evident in its measurable outcomes. High user ratings
within the ChatGPT official store highlight user satisfaction and the program’s effectiveness
in meeting diverse needs. Its ability to handle thousands of sessions monthly without
compromising quality demonstrates strong, consistent demand for accessible emotional
support. High satisfaction scores, repeat usage rates, and a wide-reaching user base
underscore FASSLING’s role as a reliable, culturally sensitive support tool.
Qualitative feedback further illuminates FASSLING’s positive impact, with users
commending the platform for its empathy, convenience, and reliability. Together with
quantitative metrics, this feedback informs ongoing improvements, ensuring that FASSLING
continues to evolve and meet user expectations. Compared to traditional nonprofits,
FASSLING’s AI-driven model offers unique advantages in scalability, accessibility,
operational efficiency, adaptability, and responsiveness. Unlike traditional nonprofits, often
limited by financial resources, FASSLING operates continuously without external funding or
a large team, efficiently serving thousands of users daily. Its online, on-demand model
eliminates logistical challenges, allowing users to access support anytime, anywhere.
By minimizing overhead costs, FASSLING maintains a mission-first focus, free from the
administrative demands associated with funding cycles. The platform’s AI-driven
adaptability allows it to swiftly adjust services to meet changing user needs, providing
personalized, culturally sensitive support across demographics. This responsiveness is
augmented by data-driven insights that enable FASSLING to improve in real time, based on
user feedback. In essence, FASSLING’s innovative, AI-based approach offers an accessible,
efficient, and adaptable alternative to traditional support models. It demonstrates how
technology can transform the nonprofit landscape by creating a universally accessible support
system, meeting users wherever they may be, and providing empathetic assistance that
transcends geographical, financial, and cultural barriers.
3.4 Benefits of the Solo-Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit Mode
AI significantly enhances scalability and efficiency by reducing the need for additional staff
and simplifying complex processes across various domains. For instance, AI-driven search
engines improve dataset expansion and search precision without human intervention, creating
a smoother user experience (Vijay et al., 2020). Similarly, AI tools like genetic algorithms
and neural networks streamline infrastructure planning in transmission expansion, reducing
costs and minimizing human oversight (Al-Saba & El-Amin, 2002). In healthcare, real-time
AI capacity management optimizes resource allocation, such as ICU availability and staff
schedules, leading to substantial cost savings and improved service delivery (Agrawal &
Turner, 2023). AI also transforms immersive media by enabling efficient 3D content
generation, lowering labor demands in cinema and extended reality (Song et al., 2023). In
motor and generator technology, AI enhances energy efficiency, allowing for scale without
increased manual input (Yin-Shen, 2020). These examples illustrate AI’s capacity to
streamline operations and optimize resources, minimizing staffing needs and reducing
organizational complexity.
Moreover, AI substantially improves operational flexibility by automating routine
administrative tasks and optimizing resource management. In higher education, for example,
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
23
AI handles enrollment, scheduling, and financial processes, enabling data-driven resource
allocation and demand forecasting (Domingo-Alejo, 2024). Similarly, healthcare operations
benefit from AI-driven patient scheduling, check-ins, fraud detection, and personalized
communication, which enhance both efficiency and patient engagement. AI also improves
accuracy in email triage and resource allocation in administrative contexts through natural
language processing and predictive analytics (D. Kumar, 2024). In legislative settings, AI
streamlines impact assessments by identifying administrative burdens, and increasing
transparency and efficiency in decision making (Costa et al., 2024). However, AI’s
effectiveness can be constrained by existing complexities, such as the need for standardized
processes in healthcare billing, that limit its potential to fully alleviate administrative burdens
(Schulman et al., 2023). Collectively, these examples underscore AI’s potential to enhance
operational flexibility and reduce administrative workloads across sectors.
Operating a nonprofit as a solo founder can significantly lower financial demands by
eliminating salary and overhead expenses, enabling direct allocation of resources toward
mission-driven work. By removing the need for staff compensation and office space, this
approach minimizes administrative costs and increases the capacity for service delivery.
Research supports revenue concentration and overhead reduction as key strategies for
financial resilience in nonprofits, contrasting with revenue diversification that can increase
administrative costs (Chikoto & Neely, 2014). Additionally, solo operations can mitigate
risks of financial mismanagement and fraud, as fewer individuals handle finances; this
emphasizes the need for strong oversight in the nonprofit sector. Thus, solo operation
streamlines financial management, focusing resources on the mission and amplifying the
nonprofit’s impact.
Cost-saving strategies across sectors facilitate reinvestment in service quality. In healthcare,
for example, hospitals can achieve savings by optimizing support services such as food and
environmental services through metrics, centralized contract management, and staff training,
which redirect resources to patient care (Nugent & Emmerich, 2014). Similarly,
telecommunications companies applying lean principles and value stream analysis reduce
costs, reallocating savings to enhance service quality (Stadnicka & Ratnayake, 2017). In
healthcare for high-need Medicare patients, Accountable Care Organizations and Home-
Based Primary Care provide cost-effective, patient-centered care (Dattalo et al., 2016). In
primary care for type 2 diabetes, economies of scale within enhanced care models allow
reinvestment in broader care services (Seidu et al., 2021). These cases demonstrate how
strategic cost management can redirect resources toward service improvements and higher
efficiency across diverse sectors.
Organizations with a single founder benefit from mission-driven operations and streamlined
decision-making, particularly in nonprofits and social enterprises focused on impact over
profit. A single founder’s commitment, often rooted in personal values, provides clear
direction and minimizes internal conflicts, ensuring alignment with the original mission. This
unified leadership facilitates agile responses to challenges without extensive negotiations,
enabling timely adaptations while upholding core values. Additionally, a single-founder
structure reduces external pressures for profitability, allowing focus on sustainable growth
strategies that prioritize impact. The personal dedication of a founder often fosters resilience,
sustaining mission-aligned growth amid challenges. Furthermore, a single founder can pursue
innovative approaches to problem solving without the constraints of balancing multiple
perspectives, thereby promoting transformative solutions that remain closely tied to the
organization’s purpose. Thus, a single-founder structure reinforces mission-driven success
through consistency, adaptability, and innovation.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
24
In single-founder organizations, reduced bureaucracy enhances operational efficiency and
decision-making speed. Without extensive layers of approval, decisions are made and
implemented promptly, allowing for dynamic responses to emerging challenges and
opportunities. This simplicity mitigates delays associated with complex administrative
processes, creating an agile and adaptable organizational culture. Fewer meetings and
approvals enable the founder to maintain a focused pursuit of strategic objectives, supporting
rapid pivots when necessary. Additionally, streamlined structures foster accountability and
clarity, with a straightforward chain of command aligning employees with the founder’s
vision. The accessibility of a single decision maker builds trust, engagement, and a
personalized work culture where employees contribute directly to organizational goals.
Overall, founder-led organizations benefit from reduced bureaucracy, promoting efficiency,
transparency, and mission alignment.
3.5 Challenges and Considerations of the Solo-Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit Mode
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in service delivery presents significant ethical
challenges, particularly regarding the preservation of empathy and human connection. While
AI systems enhance efficiency and personalization in sectors like e-commerce, they often fall
short in providing the emotional depth that human interactions offer, a quality essential for
sustaining customer satisfaction and loyalty (Jakkula, 2023). This empathy gap is especially
problematic in contexts involving vulnerable groups, such as young children and the elderly.
For example, conversational AI used in early childhood education may struggle to address
children’s emotional needs due to its limited understanding of non-literal language and
imaginative scenarios, potentially impacting their well-being (Kurian, 2023). Similarly, in
eldercare, AI robots, although helpful in meeting care demands, cannot authentically replicate
the depth of empathy needed to meet cultural expectations, such as those outlined in
Confucian filial piety, because their responses remain performative rather than genuinely
compassionate (Muyskens et al., 2024). These ethical issues extend to potential biases in AI
systems, which may perpetuate discrimination if left unregulated (Nemec, 2024). To mitigate
these concerns, research suggests that improving AI’s empathic capabilities—through
mechanisms like social presence and trust—can enhance user experience and satisfaction
(Sun & Guan, 2022). Achieving a balance between automation and empathy, however,
requires a careful evaluation of ethical frameworks and regulatory measures to ensure that AI
systems prioritize human well-being and address users’ emotional needs across various
contexts (Jakkula, 2023; Kurian, 2023; Muyskens et al., 2024; Nemec, 2024; Sun & Guan,
2022; ).
Data privacy and security are paramount in technological domains such as cloud computing,
big data, data engineering, IoT, and blockchain. In cloud-based data processing, protecting
sensitive information demands robust security measures, including data encryption, access
control, secure data transmission and storage, as well as authentication and authorization
mechanisms to comply with data protection regulations (Vashishth et al., 2024). The advent
of big data further complicates privacy and security issues, as the massive volumes of
processed information require advanced security protocols and underscore gaps in current
research (Asasfeh et al., 2024). In data engineering, ensuring reliable data protection
throughout the information lifecycle is critical, highlighting confidentiality and security’s role
in strategic decision making (Yerbulatov, 2024). IoT-based systems, especially in sectors like
livestock monitoring, face challenges such as system vulnerabilities and unauthorized access,
necessitating device authentication, encryption, and intrusion detection measures to safeguard
data integrity (Sharma et al., 2024). Blockchain technology, by leveraging decentralization,
immutability, and consensus, offers promising solutions for IoT security, with privacy-
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
25
preserving techniques such as pseudonymity and selective disclosure enhancing privacy
within interconnected environments (Anjali, 2024). These considerations underscore the
necessity of tailored security and privacy strategies for each technological domain’s unique
challenges.
The demands of managing operations alone introduce significant challenges, especially for
founders of mission-driven organizations like FASS, where work requires sustained
dedication and emotional resilience. Solo management necessitates balancing multiple tasks
(i.e., strategic planning, operational oversight, relationship building, and problem solving),
each requiring substantial cognitive and emotional resources. Over time, this intensity can
lead to burnout, stress, and physical health issues, which ultimately affect the founder’s well-
being and quality of life. The absence of a support system can also exacerbate feelings of
isolation and limit opportunities for collaborative ideation and feedback, essential for both
personal and organizational growth.
The risks associated with scaling under such constraints are considerable. As a founder’s
capacity reaches its limit, it becomes challenging to sustain the organization’s operations and
expand its impact. This may result in missed opportunities, errors, and insufficient responses
to challenges, which can harm the organization’s reputation and diminish trust among
beneficiaries, stakeholders, and volunteers. Without a team or diverse perspectives,
adaptability to evolving needs and service expansion can be compromised. As demand
increases, a lone founder may struggle to maintain service quality, thus limiting scalability
and risking dilution of the organization’s original mission. These scalability risks underscore
the importance of building a team or leveraging complementary tools such as AI, to support
operations, safeguard the founder’s well-being, and ensure sustainable organizational growth.
Public perception of AI versus human-led support significantly impacts the credibility and
adoption of AI technologies across domains like healthcare, mental health, and customer
service. Research indicates a general skepticism toward AI, with many perceiving AI-driven
interventions as less reliable and empathetic than those led by humans. For example, in
mental health, AI interventions are viewed as accessible and cost-effective yet are often
trusted less than human-led interventions due to concerns about data privacy, security, and
lack of human touch (Varghese et al., 2024). Similarly, AI-provided medical advice is often
perceived as less reliable and empathetic, resulting in lower adherence compared to human-
provided advice (Reis et al., 2024). This anti-AI bias extends to AI-generated texts, where AI
authorship is seen as reducing the content’s perceived credibility and intelligence (Henestrosa
& Kimmerle, 2024). Nonetheless, AI’s scalability and accessibility potential in mental health
care are acknowledged, although trust remains a barrier, particularly when AI’s role is
disclosed (Jain et al., 2024). In defense settings, public misconceptions and ethical concerns
complicate AI acceptance (Hadlington et al., 2024). Enhancing AI’s perceived personality
and humanness, such as through anthropomorphic design in voice assistants, can foster trust
and continuous usage, underscoring the role of social presence in AI adoption (Hsieh & Lee,
2024). In customer support, while AI chatbots are valued for certain tasks, they often lack the
warmth and competence that reduce emotional distress, a limitation that remains a concern
for users (Meng et al., 2023). Although AI holds significant potential, public trust, perceived
competence, and ethical considerations heavily influence its adoption.
3.6 Future Prospects of the Solo-Founder AI-Driven Nonprofit Mode
The future of the SFADNM promises transformative potential, particularly as the nonprofit
sector increasingly seeks innovative, cost-effective methods to expand reach and impact
without relying on traditional funding. A key advantage of this model is its scalability and
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
26
efficiency: With AI integration, single-founder nonprofits can streamline operations,
automate essential processes, and provide virtual support, achieving efficiencies comparable
to those of larger organizations. This significantly reduces overhead, making it feasible to
serve a wide array of beneficiaries at a fraction of the cost required by conventional
nonprofits. As nonprofit organizations face growing pressure to demonstrate both impact and
financial prudence, SFADNM offers an appealing solution for founders aiming to
independently launch mission-driven initiatives at scale.
Moreover, SFADNM fosters a strong alignment with the organizational mission. By retaining
direct control over values and objectives, the founder minimizes the risk of “mission drift,” a
common challenge in organizations reliant on diverse funding sources. Without external
pressures, founders are free to adhere to their core mission, preserving their original vision of
impact. This structure especially resonates with founders motivated by intrinsic values—such
as personal beliefs, moral commitments, or spiritual aspirations—who prioritize mission
fulfillment over profit or unchecked growth. As more social entrepreneurs are drawn to
mission-centered approaches, SFADNM provides a framework for sustaining impact without
the external financial pressures that can dilute an organization’s purpose.
The adaptability of SFADNM is further enhanced by AI advancements, enabling nonprofits
to deliver personalized, scalable services tailored to each beneficiary’s unique needs. AI-
driven models are particularly beneficial in fields such as mental health support, education,
and skill building, where technology can offer individualized guidance, counseling, and
instruction. This not only broadens the organization’s reach but also allows for deeper
engagement with beneficiaries, thereby improving service quality. As AI technology
continues to evolve, SFADNM’s capacity to deliver specialized, impactful support will grow,
increasing its appeal and accessibility.
Additionally, SFADNM presents an accessible entry point for founders from diverse
backgrounds, particularly those from underrepresented or minority groups with limited access
to traditional funding channels. By reducing reliance on external financial support, SFADNM
lowers entry barriers, allowing founders with modest resources but strong community ties or
specialized knowledge to establish impactful organizations. This democratization of nonprofit
leadership welcomes diverse perspectives and grassroots initiatives, supporting broader
representation within the sector and encouraging widespread adoption.
The resilience of SFADNM also positions it as an adaptable, sustainable option during crises.
In times of economic downturn, humanitarian challenges, or health emergencies, traditional
funding can become unstable, posing risks to conventional nonprofit structures. However,
with AI-driven efficiencies and streamlined operations, single-founder nonprofits can pivot
quickly, remaining agile and responsive to evolving needs. This capability to maintain
services and adapt in unpredictable environments makes SFADNM an attractive model for
founders and stakeholders seeking sustainable, crisis-ready nonprofit solutions.
As SFADNM gains awareness, industry support and recognition of such innovative nonprofit
structures are likely to grow. With the development of support networks, partnerships, and
research dedicated to AI-driven nonprofits, SFADNM could shift from mere acceptance to
active promotion. This broader recognition would not only validate the model but could also
encourage more founders to consider it as a viable path to social impact. In the long term,
SFADNM is well positioned to reshape the nonprofit landscape, empowering individuals who
value agility, innovation, and a steadfast focus on mission to create meaningful, lasting
change on their own terms.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
27
SFADNM is particularly suited to service areas that can leverage technology for scalable,
personalized support and information delivery. For example, in mental health and emotional
support, AI-driven tools like chatbots and virtual companions can have a profound impact.
By integrating conversational AI, guided meditations, and crisis management protocols,
single-founder nonprofits can provide mental health resources that are accessible, immediate,
and private—all without extensive staffing needs. This approach serves a global audience,
offering on-demand support for individuals seeking emotional reassurance.
Similarly, educational and skill-building programs align well with SFADNM, particularly as
online education and AI tutoring tools grow increasingly adept at delivering personalized
learning experiences. For a single-founder nonprofit focused on education, AI can offer
interactive lessons, virtual tutors, and language-learning applications. Through adaptive
learning algorithms, the platform can track student progress, adjust content in real time, and
offer constructive feedback, enabling diverse learning needs to be met without a large
teaching team.
Employment and career counseling can also benefit from AI-driven solutions. An AI-
powered platform that provides resume critiques, interview practice, and personalized job
recommendations would be invaluable in communities facing high unemployment or limited
access to career counseling. Through job-matching algorithms and AI-based coaching, single-
founder nonprofits can equip users with essential tools to navigate the job market—all with
minimal human intervention.
Health and wellness services present another promising area for SFADNM. Founders with
expertise in wellness could leverage AI to develop applications focused on fitness, nutrition,
and health advice, delivering personalized exercise routines, meal plans, and health tracking
to encourage healthy lifestyles. Such platforms offer regular insights and reminders, adding
significant value to users’ well-being while keeping staffing requirements low.
Legal and advocacy assistance, especially for underserved communities, is another area
where SFADNM can excel. AI-powered platforms can offer basic legal information, answer
frequently asked questions, and provide step-by-step guidance through complex processes.
Founders can create tools that offer document templates or filing guidance, making essential
legal support more accessible to individuals who might otherwise lack such resources.
Financial literacy and planning services also align well with SFADNM, with founders
leveraging AI-driven platforms to offer financial education, budgeting tools, and personalized
planning services. Particularly for low-income communities, these resources provide essential
support in managing debt, saving, and planning for the future. Automated step-by-step
guidance empowers users to build financial stability without requiring intensive one-on-one
coaching.
In social justice and human rights advocacy, SFADNM can harness AI to develop platforms
that educate users about social issues, provide updates on policy changes, and offer civic
engagement resources. By using AI-driven content delivery, single-founder nonprofits can
inspire and mobilize individuals to participate in social justice initiatives, achieving broad
engagement with minimal manual oversight.
SFADNM also suits crisis response and disaster relief, where AI-driven tools can deliver
critical information during emergencies. In crisis scenarios, a single-founder nonprofit could
leverage AI-powered hotlines or information hubs to provide timely updates and resources.
This emphasis on accessibility and responsiveness makes SFADNM an ideal structure for
high-stakes situations requiring reliable information.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
28
Environmental education and advocacy also benefit from this model. Founders focused on
sustainability can use AI to generate eco-friendly educational content, offer resources for
activism, and help users track their carbon footprint. By encouraging sustainable living
practices, AI-driven platforms foster a collective commitment to environmental
consciousness.
Lastly, SFADNM supports community-building and social support networks. AI enables
interest-based groups, peer support forums, and moderated discussions, while human
moderators can oversee sensitive conversations to foster a respectful, supportive community.
This combination of automation and human oversight creates an inclusive, interactive
community space with minimal staffing needs.
In conclusion, the SFADNM model is exceptionally well-suited for services emphasizing
scalability, personalization, and data-driven insights. By harnessing AI, single founders can
create substantial, wide-reaching support in diverse fields, such as mental health, education,
career counseling, wellness, legal assistance, financial literacy, social justice, crisis response,
environmental advocacy, and community building. This model empowers founders to make a
meaningful impact in their areas of expertise, fostering positive social change while
maintaining operational efficiency and mission alignment.
Integrating targeted human interaction alongside AI operations in SFADNM can achieve a
balance between scalability and personalization. While AI handles routine inquiries and
general support, complex or sensitive situations often benefit from the empathy and nuance of
human engagement. For example, mental health or crisis intervention services could offer
live human support during high-demand periods, allowing individuals in acute situations to
receive person-centered help. By reserving human interaction for moments of heightened
need, nonprofits can provide impactful, personalized support while managing costs,
maintaining accessibility, and preserving the human touch essential for complex cases.
In community-based services, AI can facilitate group discussions and manage content while
human moderators provide valuable oversight for sensitive topics. Peer-led groups and
volunteer-led sessions foster a sense of shared experience, adding warmth and connection.
AI’s efficiency in routine moderation enables human moderators to focus on empathy and
support, creating an inclusive, scalable community space.
To summarize, SFADNM’s hybrid model combines the scalability of AI with targeted human
engagement to create a sustainable, high-impact nonprofit. By blending technological
innovation with strategic human interaction, single-founder nonprofits can build scalable
models that remain responsive to individual needs, fostering positive social change. The
SFADNM model successfully integrates artificial intelligence into human-centered care
services, achieving 24/7, year-round, efficient, and high-quality operations to bring new
possibilities to the field of philanthropy. Through this model, AI becomes a vessel for
compassion by using technology to serve humanity, and spread love and hope.
4. Conclusion
The SFADNM model represents a transformative approach to delivering impactful services,
circumventing many traditional limitations facing nonprofit organizations. Central to this
model is the integration of AI to automate essential operations, empowering a single founder
to manage the organization with minimal resources while achieving substantial reach and
scalability. This innovative structure makes the model accessible and adaptable, especially
for founders with limited access to significant funding or large staff support. By leveraging
AI’s capabilities in automation and data-driven personalization, founders can offer high-
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
29
quality, responsive services, mirroring the impact typically associated with larger, resource-
intensive organizations.
One of the model’s foremost advantages is its cost-effectiveness and scalability. Through AI-
driven systems, tasks such as managing user inquiries, routine service interactions, and
content delivery can be automated, significantly reducing reliance on human resources. This
enables solo founders to maintain operational efficiency with minimal overhead, allowing
them to reach a broad audience at a fraction of the cost required by traditional nonprofit
models. Consequently, this AI-driven approach facilitates large-scale support in fields such as
mental health, education, or advocacy without the financial burden that often accompanies
conventional nonprofit frameworks. Another distinct benefit of the solo-run, AI-driven model
is its alignment with the organization’s mission. Traditional nonprofits often contend with
pressures to secure funding from diverse sources, which can lead to “mission drift,” or a
gradual deviation from core goals due to funders’ priorities. In contrast, the AI-driven model
empowers founders to retain direct control over the nonprofit's values and trajectory, ensuring
steadfast alignment with the original mission. This model is particularly well-suited for
founders guided by intrinsic values and a commitment to long-term social impact rather than
profit, allowing them to make decisions wholly in service of their mission and the
communities they aim to support.
Moreover, the model’s flexibility and responsiveness facilitate sustainable impact. AI
systems can adapt quickly to evolving needs, allowing founders to adjust services based on
real-time feedback or shifts in demand. This adaptability proves invaluable during crises,
economic downturns, or sudden changes in user needs, where traditional funding or staffing
models may falter. The inherent agility of the AI-driven nonprofit model allows founders to
remain responsive and effective, even in the face of unexpected challenges. The accessibility
of this model for diverse founders is also essential, especially for those from
underrepresented or minority backgrounds who may lack access to traditional funding
sources and networks. By reducing dependency on external funding, the AI-driven model
minimizes entry barriers, enabling individuals with innovative ideas and a strong mission to
establish and operate impactful organizations independently. This approach democratizes
nonprofit leadership, fostering a more diverse and inclusive sector by empowering founders
from all backgrounds to address social issues with their unique perspectives and expertise.
To summarize, the solo-founder-run, AI-driven nonprofit model offers a sustainable
framework for delivering impactful services through a combination of cost-effective
scalability, mission alignment, flexibility, and accessibility. By avoiding traditional
constraints such as extensive staffing needs, reliance on fundraising, and resource-intensive
operations, this model reimagines the potential for nonprofits. It empowers founders to
concentrate on maximizing positive outcomes for their communities, paving the way for
agile, mission-driven organizations that can effect meaningful change without sacrificing
autonomy or alignment with their core values.
Innovation is crucial within the nonprofit sector to overcome systemic challenges and bolster
organizational effectiveness. Nonprofits face unique pressures, such as limited funding and
heightened accountability, which require innovative approaches to sustain and expand their
impact. Innovation in this sector extends beyond adopting new technologies or models; it
involves fostering social innovation that can reshape societal interactions and address
complex social issues. For instance, nonprofit boards increasingly acknowledge the
importance of innovation for growth, prioritizing factors that drive effective strategies for
addressing societal challenges (Richardson & Kelly, 2023).
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
30
The potential of AI within nonprofit service models is vast, with the technology poised to
transform the sector by enhancing operational efficiency, improving decision making, and
amplifying service impact. Nonprofits are increasingly turning to generative AI tools to
streamline content creation, reduce costs, and redirect resources toward mission-critical
activities. AI’s capacity to reshape nonprofit capabilities enables these organizations to better
manage resources, design programs, and conduct predictive analysis for program evaluation
(Gooyabadi et al., 2023). Nevertheless, the integration of AI poses challenges, including
ethical concerns, data privacy, and intellectual property issues, which must be addressed to
ensure responsible use (Garhart & Rowland, 2023). Frameworks guiding ethical AI
implementation are necessary to ensure that AI effectively serves social causes (Iskandarova
& Sloan, 2023).
The integration of AI into nonprofit service models signifies a new frontier, necessitating
further research to fully comprehend and harness its potential. Scholars, social entrepreneurs,
and technologists have a unique opportunity to explore the possibilities AI offers for
nonprofits while addressing associated challenges and ethical considerations. Research on
AI’s role in extending the reach, sustainability, and impact of mission-driven organizations
can yield insights that fortify the sector and provide models for responsible AI applications.
A particularly promising avenue is AI’s potential to enhance empathy and long-term impact
in nonprofit services. While traditional nonprofits rely on human interaction to build trust and
understanding with beneficiaries, AI-driven solutions may replicate or even amplify this
empathic connection. Further studies are needed to examine how AI can deliver empathetic,
personalized support, particularly in areas like mental health, education, and social services,
where human connection is paramount. Understanding how AI-driven interactions influence
beneficiaries’ experiences could help develop technology that enhances, rather than merely
automates, the service experience.
Furthermore, research on the long-term impact of AI in nonprofit service delivery is essential
for assessing its sustainability and effectiveness. Longitudinal studies examining user
satisfaction, trust, and overall well-being could provide insights into AI’s potential to foster
lasting change, indicating which AI applications contribute most effectively to positive
outcomes. Interdisciplinary collaboration is also critical. Social entrepreneurs, with their
understanding of community needs, can work closely with technologists to ensure AI
solutions are socially relevant and ethically sound. Technologists contribute expertise in AI
development, creating adaptable and mission-aligned solutions. Through collaboration,
researchers, entrepreneurs, and technologists can drive social innovation while addressing
privacy and security concerns, ensuring that AI responsibly enhances social impact.
In conclusion, as the nonprofit sector stands at the cusp of an AI-driven transformation, more
research and careful exploration of AI’s potential are vital. Addressing empathy,
sustainability, and ethical implementation, scholars, entrepreneurs, and technologists can
shape AI’s role in nonprofits to be impactful, humane, and inclusive. This groundbreaking
research and collaboration can enable AI to fulfill its promise in creating a more
compassionate world through nonprofit innovation.
Acknowledgment
I am very grateful for the academic tools and research that have inspired this study. My
profound gratitude extends to my family for their steadfast support and encouragement during
this journey. Your confidence in my work has been a wellspring of strength and motivation.
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
31
References
Agrawal, S., & Turner, J. (2023). Using AI to build the foundation of better capacity
management. Management in Healthcare., 7(3), 194. https://doi.org/10.69554/qudr5310
Al-Saba, T., & El-Amin, I. (2002). The application of artificial intelligent tools to the
transmission expansion problem. Electric Power Systems Research, 62(2), 117–126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7796(02)00037-8
Altenried, M. (2022). The distributed factory. In University of Chicago Press eBooks (pp.
92–121). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226815503.003.0004
Anjali, V. S. (2024). Security and privacy considerations in blockchain-based IoT systems.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003403791-11
Asasfeh, A., Tarawneh, L., Pradhan, M. R., & Al-Dmour, N. A. (2024). Privacy and security
concerns in big data. 2nd International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR, 1–5).
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccr61006.2024.10532931
Beck, A., Garven, S., & Yetman, M. (2021). Do donors value volunteer commitment in
assessing nonprofit effectiveness? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2
139/ssrn.3781780
Bredtmann, J. (2016). Does government spending crowd out voluntary labor and donations?
IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.299
Caramidaru, I., & Ionica, A. (2021). In search of sustainable social impact: A system dynamics
approach to managing nonprofit organizations operating in multi-project contexts. MATEC
Web of Conferences, 343, 07007. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134307007
Carr, S. C., Eltayeb, S., MacLachlan, M., Marai, L., McAuliffe, E., & McWha, I. (2013).
Salient challenges of staffing and managing employees in the nonprofit sector.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069264-20
Chamberlain, P., Jadva, V., & Buckley, S. (2024). P-496 Being a solo mother: An exploration
of parenting experiences and support needs of women who intentionally choose to become
mothers without a partner. Human Reproduction, 39(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/
10.1093/humrep/deae108.837
Chikoto, G. L., & Neely, D. G. (2013). Building nonprofit financial capacity. Nonprofit and
Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012474120
Costa, V., Coelho, P., & Castelli, M. (2024b). Artificial intelligence for impact assessment of
administrative burdens. Emerging Science Journal, 8(1), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.
28991/esj-2024-08-01-019
Dattalo, M., Nothelle, S., & Chapman, E. N. (2016). Targeting enhanced services toward
high-cost, high-need Medicare patients. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28137-7_2
Deepa, S., & Abirami, A. (2024). The impact of AI on customer experience. Advances in
marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series (pp. 263–285).
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2276-5.ch014
Domingo-Alejo, J. (2024). AI integrated administration tool design with ML technology for
Smart Education system. 4th International Conference on Advance Computing and
Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 1423–1428. https://doi.org/10.
1109/icacite60783.2024.10616455
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
32
Domiter, M., & Marciszewska, A. (2018). Challenges for contemporary non-profit
organizations–Theoretical deliberations. Management Sciences, 23(1), 20–26.
https://doi.org/10.15611/ms.2018.1.03
Echegu, D. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in customer service: Revolutionising support
and engagement. International Academic Association Journal of Scientific Research, 11(2),
33–39. https://doi.org/10.59298/iaajsr/2024/112.3339
Efthymiou, I. P., Alevizos, A., & Sidiropoulos, S. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in
revolutionizing NGOs’ work. Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI,
2(1), e35137. https://doi.org/10.12681/jpentai.35137
El-Amin, A. (2023). Utilizing effective volunteer management to elevate nonprofit
organizational capacity. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership.
https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2022-11716
Elikwu, F. (2019). Exploring the impact of cross-functional collaboration on organizational
mission alignment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3396876
Fleming, C. J., McCartha, E. B., & Steelman, T. A. (2015). Conflict and collaboration in
wildfire management: The role of mission alignment. Public Administration Review, 75(3),
445–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12353
Flores, C. (2024). Building trust in the AI ecosystem by re-evaluating public perception.
Challenger Research Journal UC San Diego, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/cr37224
Gallagher, T. L., Gosine, K., & Parker, D. C. (2024). Funding (in)security and challenges:
Non-profit literacy programming and neoliberal contradictions in Canada. Journal of
Health and Human Services Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/10793739241253224
Garhart, N., & Rowland, C. (2023). It wasn’t me, it was the AI: Intellectual property and data
privacy concerns with nonprofits’ use of artificial intelligence systems. Board &
Administrator for Administrators Only, 40(4), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/ban.31609
Gooyabadi, A. A., GorjianKhanzad, Z., & Lee, N. (2023). The AI Revolution in nonprofits: A
new paradigm. In Nonprofit digital transformation demystified (pp. 175–185).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47182-7_10
Hadlington, L., Karanika-Murray, M., Slater, J., Binder, J., Gardner, S., & Knight, S. (2024).
Public perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in defence: A qualitative exploration.
AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01871-w
Hajiyev, Y. (2024). Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in task management systems.
In PAHTEI-Proceedings of Azerbaijan High Technical Educational Institutions, 41(06),
501–509. https://doi.org/10.36962/pahtei41062024-55
Henestrosa, A. L., & Kimmerle, J. (2024). The effects of assumed AI vs. human authorship on
the perception of a GPT-generated text. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wrusc
Hsu, W., Lee, Y., Nagarajan, N. J., & Srinidhi, B. (2023). The role of founder decision rights
and operating and disclosure mechanisms in firm value creation. Advances in Accounting,
61, 100643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2023.100643
Iskandarova, S., & Sloan, M. F. (2023). Exploring nonprofit and government agency AI
policies and regulations: Systems leadership. In 2023 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial
Intelligence and Internet of Things (pp. 197–203). https://doi.org/10.1109/
gcaiot61060.2023.10385109
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
33
Jadhav, R. D., & Banubakode, A. (2024). The implications of artificial intelligence on the
employment sector. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3).
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.22716
Jain, G., Pareek, S., & Carlbring, P. (2024). Revealing the source: How awareness alters
perceptions of AI and human-generated mental health responses. Internet Interventions, 36,
100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2024.100745
Jakkula, A. R. (2023). The human element in AI: Balancing automation with empathy in
e-commerce. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2(4), 1–2.
https://doi.org/10.47363/jaicc/2023(2)351
Kim, M., & Charbonneau, É. (2018). Caught between volunteerism and professionalism:
Support by nonprofit leaders for the donative labor hypothesis. Review of Public Personnel
Administration, 40(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x18816139
Kormann, H., & Suberg, B. (2020). Governance for the lone founder. In Management for
professionals (pp. 23–25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58019-3_6
Kumar, D. (2024). AI-driven automation in administrative processes: Enhancing efficiency
and accuracy. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 14(Special Issue
1), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.62904/qg004437
Kumar, R., Nilaish, V. V., & Rajkumar. (2024). A study on implementation of artificial
intelligence technologies in business automachine. International Journal of Advanced
Research in Commerce, Management & Social Science, 07(01(II)), 206–210.
https://doi.org/10.62823/7.1(ii).6518
Kurian, N. (2023). AI’s empathy gap: The risks of conversational Artificial Intelligence for
young children’s well-being and key ethical considerations for early childhood education
and care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1177/
14639491231206004
Liu, F. (2024). Research and outlook on the role of artificial intelligence in enterprise
operations and management. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 35,
681–687. https://doi.org/10.54097/x8a78124
Ma, J., Jing, E., & Han, J. (2018). Predicting mission alignment and preventing mission drift:
Do revenue sources matter? Chinese Public Administration Review, 9(1), 25–33.
https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v9i1.173
Matsimbi, A. (2014). Business sustainability challenges experienced by philanthropic
non-governmental organisations: The case of the Capricorn District Municipality, South
Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p711
McKeever, B. W. (2024). Nonprofit organizations. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327189-12
Meng, J., Rheu, M., Zhang, Y., Dai, Y., & Peng, W. (2023). Mediated social support for
distress reduction: AI chatbots vs. human. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer
interaction, 7(CSCW1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579505
Molloy, C., Bankins, S., Kriz, A., & Barnes, L. (2023). Innovating for the greater good:
Examining innovation champions and what motivates them. Australian Journal of Public
Administration, 83(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12577
Molk, P., & Sokol, D. D. (2020). Nonprofit governance in an age of compliance. SSRN
Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668951
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
34
Muyskens, K., Ma, Y., & Dunn, M. (2024). Can an AI-carebot be filial? Reflections from
Confucian ethics. Nursing Ethics, 31(6), 999–1009.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241238332
Mytrofanova, H., Yevtushenko, O., Hlukhyy, A., & Lugovyy, M. (2024). Methodological
principles of implementing artificial intelligence into organizational management system.
Academic Review, 2(61), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-2-61-12
Negi, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence. In Advances in logistics, operations, and management
science book series (pp. 226–240). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0418-1.ch015
Nemec, J. (2024). Analyzing potential solutions involving regulation to escape some of AI’s
ethical concerns. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.15507
Paelman, V., Van Cauwenberge, P., & Bauwhede, H. V. (2022). Mission alignment with
employees and financiers: Probing into the workings of B Corp certification. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1632–1644.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2440
Pendy, B. (2023). Role of AI in business management. Brilliance Research of Artificial
Intelligence, 3(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v3i1.2191
Reis, M., Reis, F., & Kunde, W. (2024). Influence of believed AI involvement on the
perception of digital medical advice. Nature Medicine, 30(11), 3098–3100.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03180-7
Richardson, S., & Kelly, S. J. (2023). Nonprofit boards in pursuit of innovation for growth:
Views from the frontline. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(3), 666–688.
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231189457
Schulman, K. A., Nielsen, P. K., & Patel, K. (2023). AI alone will not reduce the administrative
burden of health care. JAMA, 330(22), 2159. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.23809
Seidu, S., Gillies, C., Farooqi, A., Trivedi, H., Than, T., Brady, E., Davies, M. J., & Khunti, K.
(2020). A cost comparison of an enhanced primary care diabetes service and standard care.
Primary Care Diabetes, 15(3), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.10.011
Sen, S., & Patel, W. (2023). Exploring the uncertain effects of AI-powered automation.
2554–2558. https://doi.org/10.1109/icacite57410.2023.10182831
Sharma, D., Anawade, P., Gahane, S., & Patil, Y. (2024). Security and privacy considerations
in IoT-Based livestock monitoring systems. In 2024 International conference on innovations
and challenges in emerging technology (ICICET), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icicet
59348.2024.10616284
Singh, R., Sonewar, P., Kumar, M., Shingare, A., Deshpande, A., Satyam, K., Colorafi, J.,
Kakade, S., & Colorafi, K. J. (2022). Empowering nonprofit organization to reduce
donation attrition with machine learning. 2022 IEEE Pune Section International
Conference (PuneCon), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/punecon55413.2022.10014768
Smith, S. R., & Phillips, S. D. (2015). The changing and challenging environment of nonprofit
human services: Implications for governance and program implementation. Nonprofit
Policy Forum, 7(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0039
Song, J., Wang, B., Wang, Z., & Yip, D. K. (2023). From expanded cinema to extended reality:
How AI can expand and extend cinematic experiences, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/
3615522.3615556
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
35
Sravanthi, J., Sobti, R., Semwal, A., Shravan, M., Al-Hilali, A. A., & Alazzam, M. B. (2023).
AI-assisted resource allocation in project management. In 3rd International Conference on
Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 70–74.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icacite57410.2023.10182760
Stadnicka, D., & Ratnayake, R. C. (2017). Enhancing performance in service organisations:
A case study based on value stream analysis in the telecommunications industry.
International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 6984–6999.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1346318
Stecker, M. J. (2014). Revolutionizing the nonprofit sector through social entrepreneurship.
Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.2753/jei0021-3624480208
Sun, X., & Guan, H. (2022). Research on empathic remediation mechanism of chatbots
mediated by social presence and trust. Proceedings of the 2021 5th International
Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering, 772–776.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3573428.3573566
Tiwari, K. N., & Clotfelter, C. T. (1994). Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? Southern
Economic Journal, 60(3), 795. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060606
Todorova, A., & Antonova, D. (2023). Smart marketing solutions: Applications with artificial
intelligence to increase the effectiveness of marketing operations. 4th International
Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismsit58785.2023.10304899
Van Gorp, S. A. (2012). Innovation in the nonprofit organizational context.
https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.pxai4ufj
Van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2020). Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence
technologies in public services. International Conference on Theory and Practice of
Electronic Governance 2020, Athens (pp. 8–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428504
Van Steenburg, E., Anaza, N. A., Ashhar, A., Barrios, A., Deutsch, A. R., Gardner, M. P.,
Priya, P., Roy, A., Sivaraman, A., & Taylor, K. A. (2022). The new world of philanthropy:
How changing financial behavior, public policies, and COVID‐19 affect nonprofit
fundraising and marketing. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(3), 1079–1105.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12461
Varghese, M. A., Sharma, P., & Patwardhan, M. (2024). Who do I trust more? Public
perception on AI-driven mental health interventions: A survey research (Preprint).
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.64380
Vashishth, T. K., Sharma, V., Sharma, K. K., Kumar, B., Chaudhary, S., & Panwar, R. (2024).
Security and privacy considerations in cloud-based data processing solutions for sensitive
data. In Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance
computing book series (pp. 35–61). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5643-2.ch002
Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K., & Geobey, S. (2014). Five
configurations for scaling up social Innovation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
50(3), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314532945
Willard, G. E., Krueger, D. A., & Feeser, H. R. (1992). In order to grow, must the founder go:
A comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high-growth
manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3), 181–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90025-m
Zhu / Radical Innovation in Leveraging AI Through Founder Mode: Scaling Social Impact in…
36
Wilson, G., Johnson, O., & Brown, W. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on customer
relationship management. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0766.v1
Woolley, C. (2024). Managing large-scale nonprofit programs with limited resources. Journal
of Nonprofit Education and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2024-12368
Yerbulatov, S. (2024). Data security and privacy in data engineering. International Journal of
Science and Research (IJSR), 13(4), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.21275/es24318121241