ArticlePDF Available

Northward expansion of the Critically Endangered Arabian leopard in Dhofar, Oman

Authors:
  • Royal Commission for AlULA

Abstract and Figures

The Critically Endangered Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr was believed to be absent from the Nejd region in Dhofar Governorate, Oman. However, a scat confirmed by DNA analysis in 2011 and camera-trap images from 2014 confirmed the presence of the leopard in this region. During 2014–2021, our camera traps documented at least eight individual leopards, demonstrating the species is resident and breeding in the region. This finding extends the Arabian leopard's known range in Oman by c. 40 km northwards. To improve detection probability, we recommend that camera-trap surveys for the leopard in the Arabian Peninsula are of at least 18 weeks duration. We advocate the designation of central and western areas of the Nejd as a National Nature Reserve, to protect critical habitat for the Arabian leopard and for other species in this region.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Northward expansion of the Critically Endangered
Arabian leopard in Dhofar, Oman
HADI ALHIKMANI*
,,
and K HALID ALHIKMANI
,,
Abstract The Critically Endangered Arabian leopard
Panthera pardus nimr was believed to be absent from the
Nejd region in Dhofar Governorate, Oman. However, a
scat confirmed by DNA analysis in  and camera-trap
images from  confirmed the presence of the leopard
in this region. During , our camera traps docu-
mented at least eight individual leopards, demonstrating
the species is resident and breeding in the region. This find-
ing extends the Arabian leopards known range in Oman by
c.  km northwards. To improve detection probability, we
recommend that camera-trap surveys for the leopard in the
Arabian Peninsula are of at least  weeks duration. We ad-
vocate the designation of central and western areas of the
Nejd as a National Nature Reserve, to protect critical habitat
for the Arabian leopard and for other species in this region.
Keywords Arabian leopard, Arabian Peninsula, camera
trap, Dhofar mountains, Nejd, Oman, Panthera pardus
nimr
The Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr is the largest
extant felid species in the Arabian Peninsula and cur-
rently occupies just % of its historical range (Jacobson
et al., ; Dunford et al., ; Al Hikmani et al., b).
Arabian leopards face multiple threats, including persecu-
tion by people, habitat loss and fragmentation, prey scarcity,
capture for the illegal pet trade, and genetic depletion as a
result of the small population size (Al Jumaily et al., ;
Spalton et al., ; Al Johany, ; Al Hikmani, ;
Islam et al., ). The global wild population is estimated
to comprise  individuals, with the largest known
subpopulation in the Dhofar Governorate of southern
Oman (Al Hikmani et al., a,b).
In Dhofar, the leopard was once widespread throughout
the mountainous areas, including the northward draining
wadis of the Nejd region (Spalton & Al Hikmani, ).
The Nejd, north of the Dhofar mountains (Fig. ), is charac-
terized by a heterogeneous landscape of rolling plateaus, low
cliffs and wadis that extend northward to the Empty Quarter
sand desert. Prominent wadis in this area include Aydam
and Nakhur in the west, Marweet, Gharah, Amat and
Ghadun in the central area, and Andhur and Arah in the
east. The Nejd is arid, receiving , mm of rainfall per
year (Al Kindi et al., ), with sparse vegetation dominated
by thorn trees such as Vachellia spp. Annual temperature is
 °C in the winter (DecemberMarch) and  °C in
the summer (AprilAugust). There are only a few villages
along the southern and northern fringes of the Nejd, and the
Jabal Samhan Nature Reserve occupies the easternmost area.
Anecdotal local reports of killing of leopards suggested
that the Arabian leopard may have been extirpated from
the Nejd, with any remaining individuals having been
pushed towards the southern slopes of the Dhofar moun-
tains (Fig. ). Camera-trap surveys in the central Nejd be-
tween  September  and  June , and in the
western Nejd between September and  December 
did not detect leopards, leading to presumption of their ab-
sence (Office for Conservation of the Environment, unpubl.
data; Table ,Fig. a,b). Surveys during  reported
scats and scrape marks in central Nejd but camera-trap de-
ployments did not record leopards (Mazzolli & Hammer,
; Mazzolli, ; McGregor et al., ). However,
DNA analysis of a single scat found in  confirmed it
to be that of a leopard (Mazzolli et al., ,), and
in  camera-trap images confirmed the presence of
leopards in the central Nejd (Mand F;Table ,Fig. a;
Al Hikmani et al., ). These findings prompted further
surveys to determine whether leopards are resident in the
area, or if their presence was a temporary expansion result-
ing from individuals dispersing from known populations in
the south.
During , we conducted four unstructured
camera-trap surveys in the central Nejd (Table ,Fig. a).
On  February , a female leopard (F) previously re-
corded in January  in Wadi Amat (central Nejd) was
photographed again. This female was also recorded on 
March , March  (with a month-old cub) and
 July . The same female, now with an adult cub, was
recorded further east in Wadi Ghadun in January 
(Plate ). Another female (F) was documented in the upper
reaches of central Nejd in October .Amaleleopard(M)
was recorded in Wadi Marweet in April , and a different
male (M) in Wadi Ghadun in August . Genetic analysis
of scats collected during  identified three individual
leopards in Wadi Amat (Al Hikmani et al., b).
During JanuaryDecember , we conducted three
systematic camera-trapping surveys in the Nejd to assess
*Corresponding author, h.alhakmani@rcu.gov.sa
1
Office for Conservation of the Environment, Diwan of Royal Court, Muscat,
Oman
2
Royal Commission for AlUla, AlUla, Saudi Arabia
3
IUCN Species Survival Commission Cat Specialist Group
4
General Directorate of Environment, Environment Authority, Salalah, Oman
Received  May . Revision requested  June .
Accepted  October .
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use,
distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Oryx
, Page 1 of 5 ©The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001662
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605324001662 Published online by Cambridge University Press
leopard status and distribution: western Nejd ( km
)
north of Jabal Qamar, central Nejd ( km
) north of
Jabal Qara, and eastern Nejd ( km
) north of Jabal
Samhan (Table ;Fig. ac). Cameras were spaced km
apart and operated continuously with a s delay between
consecutive photos.
Across , trap-days, we recorded the leopard and 
additional species of wild mammals .kg (Table ).
We obtained four independent records of two individual
leopards, a male (M) and a female (F), in the western
Nejd north of Jabal Qamar, close to the border with
Yemen, on  January,  February,  March and  May
FIG. 1 Dhofar Governorate, Oman,
showing the Nejd region and the
location of Arabian leopard Panthera
pardus nimr records in western and
central Nejd. The leopards known range
in  is from Spalton & Al Hikmani
(), and the current range in  is
based on the IUCN Red List (Al
Hikmani et al., a) and this study.
TABLE 1 Camera-trap surveys for the Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr in the central, western and eastern Nejd during ,
with survey periods, number of camera traps used, leopard records in chronological order (Fig. ), effort and number of individual leop-
ards identified.
Camera-trap survey
(area) Survey period
Number of
camera
traps
Leopard
records
Effort
(trap-
days)
Number of
individuals
(ID)
1
Source
20042007 (Central) 20/09/200417/06/2007 8 7,222 0 Office for Conservation
of the Environment
(unpubl. data)
20082011 (Central) 03/02/200824/06/2008
17/01/201012/02/2010
08/02/201102/03/2011
5
7
14
712
135
143
0
0
0
Mazzolli & Hammer
(2008), McGregor et al.
(2011), Mazzolli et
al. (2013)
2013 (Western) 05/09/201330/12/2013 5 464 0 Office for Conservation
of the Environment
(unpubl. data)
2014 (Central) 31/12/201318/06/2014 5 1,2,3 170 2 (M1,F1) Al Hikmani et al.
(2015)
20152019 (Central) 11/01/201522/09/2015
28/09/201604/06/2017
18/09/201721/12/2017
17/06/201920/10/2019
5
8
7
5
4,5,6,7
8,9
10
11
1,230
1,967
649
618
2 (F1,cub)
3 (F1,cub,M2)
1 (F2)
1 (M3)
Office for Conservation
of the Environment
(unpubl. data)
2021 (Western) 07/01/202118/05/2021 20 12,13,14,15,17 2231 2 (M4,F3) This study
2021 (Central) 10/10/202108/12/2021 20 16,18 1154 1 (M5) This study
2021 (Eastern) 17/01/202125/05/2021 34 2,283 0 This study
M, male; F, female.
2 H. Al Hikmani and K. Al Hikmani
Oryx
, Page 2 of 5 ©The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001662
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605324001662 Published online by Cambridge University Press
. We recorded one male leopard (M) from the central
Nejd, on  November , but no leopards from the
eastern Nejd, despite its proximity to a known leopard
population in southern Jabal Samhan, and the absence of
geographical barriers to leopard movement (Spalton et al.,
; Al Hikmani et al., b). Two independent leopard
records from the central ( May ) and western Nejd
( August ) were obtained from opportunistic camera
traps deployed by wildlife rangers. In total, we recorded
 independent camera-trap detections of at least eight
individual leopards and a cub during , providing
unequivocal evidence that the Arabian leopard is not
only resident but also breeding in the central and western
Nejd.
These records confirm the return of leopards to the
central Nejd, indicate its presence in the western Nejd for
the first time, and extend the speciesknown range in
Dhofar northward by c.  km, with the northernmost
confirmed record in Dhofar to date. Further northwards,
the habitat becomes open and with sparse cover, limiting
opportunities for further range expansion.
Given the absence of evidence of leopards in the central
Nejd during  despite camera-trap surveys, it is
likely that leopards were absent during this period. The
leopard records from camera traps placed in the same loca-
tion in , combined with evidence from  surveys
(Mazzolli & Hammer, ; Mazzolli, ; McGregor et
al., ), provide further evidence of the apparent return
of leopards to the central Nejd.
We recommend long-term monitoring of leopard popu-
lations in the central and western Nejd, and repeating sur-
veys in the eastern Nejd, north of Jabal Samhan. The eastern
Nejd is the larger of the three areas, and more camera traps
were deployed there than in the central or western Nejd, but
the number of effective trapping days ( days) was lower
than in western Nejd ( days), where we recorded
two leopards. Our survey in the eastern Nejd may also
have been compromised by the activity of frankincense
Boswellia sacra resin harvesters, recorded at  of our 
camera deployment sites, which could have resulted in leo-
pards avoiding this area at the time. The extent of favourable
leopard habitat and the abundance of prey species in the
eastern Nejd makes further surveys a priority in this area.
BasedonourleoparddetectionsinthewesternNejd,we
recommend a minimum camera-trap deployment period of
 weeks, to achieve a % probability of recording the pres-
ence of Arabian leopards in this region (Fig. ). This recom-
mendation has implications for surveying and monitoring
Arabian leopards and other threatened arid-adapted mammal
species across the Arabian Peninsula. In addition, and given
FIG. 2 Detailed locations of camera traps
deployed in the (a) central, (b) western
and (c) eastern Nejd region (Fig. )
during . Numbers (Table )
indicate records of the Arabian leopard,
in chronological order (,January ;
, January ;,May ;,
February ;, March ;,
March ;, July ;, January
;, April ;, October
;, August ;, January
;, February ;, March
;, May ;, May ;,
 August ;, November ).
Sindicates the leopard scat from 
(Mazzolli et al., ), and SSare the
leopard scats from the  genetic
study (Al Hikmani et al., b).
PLATE 1 Female F(record number ;Fig. ), with an adult cub,
recorded in Wadi Ghadun in the Central Nejd on  January .
The Arabian leopard in Oman 3
Oryx
, Page 3 of 5 ©The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001662
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605324001662 Published online by Cambridge University Press
the conservation importance of the Arabian leopard, we
recommend designating the central and western Nejd as a
National Nature Reserve, to protect critical habitat. Such
a designation would also benefit other charismatic fauna
(e.g. the Nubian ibex Capra nubiana and Arabian gazelle
Gazella arabica) and flora such as frankincense and myrrh
Commiphora myrrha, bothofwhichareofregionaland
global interest.
Acknowledgements This research was supported by the Office for
Conservation of the Environment in Oman when it was under the
Diwan of Royal Court. We thank both organizations for their support,
and the following former Office for Conservation of the Environment
staff for their assistance with camera-trap surveys: Ali Akaak, Sadi
Zabanoot, Talal Al Shahri, Khalid Mohammed Ali Al Hikmani,
Nasser Zabanoot, Khalid Hardan, Ahmed Hardan, Abu Bakr
Bawazir, Amer Zabanoot, Said Mabrouk Zabanoot, Ahmed Al
Shahri, Ahmed Al Kathiri, Fahad Al Shaashii, Hamed Hawas,
Musallam Al Amri, Mohammed Hubais, Salim Al Amri, Suhail Bait
Said and Omar Al Kathiri. We thank Andrew Spalton and Jim
Labisko for their valuable comments and Alaaeldin Soultan for help
with the cumulative probabilities of detection analysis.
Author contributions Writing: HAH; study design, fieldwork, data
analysis, editing, revision: both authors.
Conflicts of interest None.
Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on
ethical standards.
Data availability Data are available from the authors upon reason-
able request.
References
ALHIKMANI,H.() Leopards, camels and frankincense: the
Arabian leopard of Dhofar, Oman. Cat News, Special Issue ,.
ALHIKMANI, H., ZAABANOOT,N.&ZAABANOOT,A.() Camera
trapping of Arabian leopard in the Nejd region of Dhofar
Mountains. Cat News,,.
ALHIKMANI, H., SPALTON, A., ZAFAR-UL ISLAM, M., AL-JOHANY,
A., SULAYEM, M., AL-DUAIS,M.&ALMALKI,A.(a) Panthera
pardus ssp. nimr (amended version of  assessment). In The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species .dx.doi.org/./
IUCN.UK.-.RLTS.TA.en.
ALHIKMANI, H., VAN OOSTERHOUT, C., BIRLEY, T., LABISKO, G.,
JACKSON, H.J., S PALTON,A.etal.(b) Can genetic rescue help
save Arabias last big cat? Evolutionary Applications,,e.
ALJOHANY, A.M.H. () Distribution and conservation of the
Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr in Saudi Arabia. Journal of
Arid Environments,,.
ALJUMAILY, M., MALLON, D.P., NASHER, A.K. & THOWABEH,N.
() Status report on Arabian leopard in Yemen. Cat News,
Special Issue ,.
ALKINDI, K.M., ALNADHAIRI,R.&ALAKHZAMI,S.()
Dynamic change in normalised vegetation index (NDVI) from 
to  in Dhofar, Southern Oman in response to the climate
change. Agriculture,,.
DUNFORD, C.E., FAURE, J.P.B., ROSS, M.D., S PALTON, J.A., DROUILLY,
M., PRY CE-FITCHEN, K.J.P. et al. () Searching for spots: a
comprehensive survey for Arabian leopards (Panthera pardus nimr)
in Saudi Arabia. Oryx,,.
ISLAM, M.Z., BOUG, A., J UDAS,J.&AS-SHEHRI,A.()
Conservation challenges for the Arabian leopard (Panthera pardus
nimr) in Western Highlands of Arabia. Biodiversity,,.
JACOBSON, A.P., G ERNGROSS, P., LEMERIS, J.R., S CHOONOVER, R.F.,
ANCO, C., BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN, C. et al. () Leopard
(Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts
across its range. PeerJ,,e.
TABLE 2 Mammal species recorded during the  camera-trap
surveys in the Nejd region, with their IUCN Red List category
and the areas in which they were recorded.
Species Red List category Recorded areas
Arabian leopard Critically
Endangered
West, Central
Caracal Caracal caracal
schmitzi
Least Concern Central
African wildcat Felis lybica
lybica
Least Concern West, Central,
East
Striped hyaena Hyaena
hyaena sultana
Near Threatened West, Central
Arabian wolf Canis lupus
arabs
Least Concern West, Central,
East
Blanfords fox Vulpes cana Least Concern Central, East
Arabian red fox Vulpes
vulpes arabica
Least Concern West, Central,
East
Honey badger Mellivora
capensis
Least Concern West, Central
Indian crested porcupine
Hystrix indica
Least Concern West, Central,
East
Nubian ibex Capra nubiana Vulnerable West, Central,
East
Arabian gazelle Gazella
arabica
Vulnerable West, Central,
East
Cape hare Lepus capensis Least Concern East
Rock hyrax Procavia
capensis
Least Concern West, Central,
East
FIG. 3 Cumulative probability of camera-trap detection of the
Arabian leopard in the western Nejd.
4 H. Al Hikmani and K. Al Hikmani
Oryx
, Page 4 of 5 ©The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001662
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605324001662 Published online by Cambridge University Press
MAZZOLLI,M.() Arabian leopard, Panthera pardus nimr, status
and habitat assessment in northwest Dhofar, Oman (Mammalia:
Felidae). Zoology in the Middle East,,.
MAZZOLLI,M.&HAMMER,M.()Expedition Report: Status of the
Arabian Leopard (Panthera pardus nimr) in Dhofar, Sultanate of
Oman.  January - February . Biosphere Expeditions,
Norwich, UK. biosphere-expeditions.org/images/stories/pdfs/
reports/report-oman.pdf [accessed January ].
MAZZOLLI, M., ALHIKMANI,K.&HAMMER,M.()Expedition
Report: Status of the Arabian Leopard (Panthera pardus nimr)in
Dhofar, Sultanate of Oman. February - March . Biosphere
Expeditions, Norwich, UK. biosphere-expeditions.org/images/
stories/pdfs/reports/report-oman.pdf [accessed January ].
MAZZOLLI, M., HAAG, T., LIPPERT, B.G., EIZIRIK, E., HAMMER,
M.L.A. & ALHIKMANI,K.() Multiple methods increase
detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with
volunteers in south-eastern Oman. Oryx,,.
MCGREGOR, T., ALHIKMANI,H.&HAMMER,M.()
Expedition Report: Status of the Arabian Leopard (Panthera
pardus nimr) in Dhofar, Sultanate of Oman.  January
 February , January  February . Biosphere
Expeditions, Norwich, UK. biosphere-expeditions.org/
images/stories/pdfs/reports/report-oman.pdf [accessed
January ].
SPALTON,A.&ALHIKMANI,H.()The Arabian Leopards of
Oman. Stacey International, London, UK.
SPALTON, J.A., ALHIKMANI, H.M., JAHDHAMI, M.H., IBRAHIM,
A.A.A., BAIT SAID, A.S. & WILLIS ,D.() Status report for
the Arabian leopard in the Sultanate of Oman. Cat News, Special
Issue ,.
The Arabian leopard in Oman 5
Oryx
, Page 5 of 5 ©The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001662
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605324001662 Published online by Cambridge University Press
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Genetic diversity underpins evolutionary potential that is essential for the long‐term viability of wildlife populations. Captive populations harbor genetic diversity potentially lost in the wild, which could be valuable for release programs and genetic rescue. The Critically Endangered Arabian leopard (Panthera pardus nimr) has disappeared from most of its former range across the Arabian Peninsula, with fewer than 120 individuals left in the wild, and an additional 64 leopards in captivity. We (i) examine genetic diversity in the wild and captive populations to identify global patterns of genetic diversity and structure; (ii) estimate the size of the remaining leopard population across the Dhofar mountains of Oman using spatially explicit capture–recapture models on DNA and camera trap data, and (iii) explore the impact of genetic rescue using three complementary computer modeling approaches. We estimated a population size of 51 (95% CI 32–79) in the Dhofar mountains and found that 8 out of 25 microsatellite alleles present in eight loci in captive leopards were undetected in the wild. This includes two alleles present only in captive founders known to have been wild‐sourced from Yemen, which suggests that this captive population represents an important source for genetic rescue. We then assessed the benefits of reintroducing novel genetic diversity into the wild population as well as the risks of elevating the genetic load through the release of captive‐bred individuals. Simulations indicate that genetic rescue can improve the long‐term viability of the wild population by reducing its genetic load and realized load. The model also suggests that the genetic load has been partly purged in the captive population, potentially making it a valuable source population for genetic rescue. However, the greater loss of its genetic diversity could exacerbate genomic erosion of the wild population during a rescue program, and these risks and benefits should be carefully evaluated. An important next step in the recovery of the Arabian leopard is to empirically validate these conclusions, implement and monitor a genomics‐informed management plan, and optimize a strategy for genetic rescue as a tool to recover Arabia's last big cat.
Article
Full-text available
The Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr is categorized as Critically Endangered, with < 200 individuals estimated to remain in the wild. Historically the species ranged over an extensive area of western Saudi Arabia but, with no confirmed sightings since 2014, investigating potential continued presence and distribution is of critical conservation importance. We present the results of a comprehensive survey designed to detect any remaining Arabian leopard populations in Saudi Arabia. We conducted 14 surveys, deploying 586 camera-trap stations at 13 sites, totalling 82,075 trap-nights. Questionnaire surveys were conducted with 843 members of local communities across the Arabian leopard's historical range to assess the presence of leopards, other predators and prey species. Predator scats were collected ad hoc by field teams and we used mitochondrial DNA analysis to identify the originating species. We obtained 62,948 independent photographs of animals and people, but none were of Arabian leopards. Other carnivores appeared widespread and domestic animals were numerous, but wild prey were comparatively scarce. Three questionnaire respondents reported sightings of leopards within the previous year, but targeted camera-trap surveys in these areas did not yield evidence of leopards. Of the 143 scats sent for analysis, no DNA was conclusively identified as that of the leopard. From this extensive study, we conclude there are probably no surviving, sustainable populations of Arabian leopards in Saudi Arabia. Individual leopards might be present but were not confirmed. Any future Arabian leopard conservation in Saudi Arabia will probably require reintroduction of captive-bred leopards.
Article
Full-text available
Climate change poses a major threat to vegetation and land cover worldwide. The loss of vegetation as a result of climate change can alter the functions and structure of the environment and its ecological systems. In the first part of this study, Sentinel-2 data, normalised different vegetation index (NDVI), and multiple regression methods were used to examine the impacts of the climatic factors of humidity, rainfall, and air temperature on vegetation dynamics from 2015 to 2021 in Dhofar, Southern Oman. In the second part of this study, random forest regression was employed to model the relationships between the NDVI and temperature, humidity, rainfall, soil map, geology map, topographic wetness index, curvature, elevation, slope, aspect, distance to buildings, and distance to roads. The multiple regression values revealed significant associations between the spatial distributions of the NDVI and the abovementioned climatic factors. The findings also indicated an increase of 1 °C in air temperature fluctuations between 2018 and 2021 over all five sites, with a strong tendency over Qairoon Hairiti Mountain. The rainfall records clearly indicated an increasing tendency from 2018 to 2020 due to the impact of frequent cyclones. Therefore, the results revealed a significant increase of 0.01 in the vegetation cover trend in 2018, 2019, and 2020 along the Sadah Mountain range and the eastern part of the Jabal Qara Mountains under the areas directly impacted by the cyclone, whereas there was a decrease along the western mountain range consisting of Jabal Qara and Jabal Qamar Mountains due to the impact of warm, dry air. The results revealed that NDVI values were sensitive to heavy rainfall over Jabal Samhan Mountain. The 12 variables that influenced NDVI levels had different levels of importance. Soil types, elevation, slope, rainfall, curvature, humidity, and temperature had the highest importance, while topographic wetness index, distance to urban area, aspect, distance to roads, and geology map had the lowest. The findings provide a significant foundation for Oman’s planning and management of regional vegetation, water conservation, and animal husbandry.
Research
Full-text available
Abstract The Arabian Leopard Panthera pardus nimr is a flagship species for Oman’s mountain habitats. It is classified by IUCN as critically endangered and is listed on Appendix 1 of the convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and has disappeared from most of its former range on the Arabian Peninsula. Most of the remaining wild population is confined to the mountains of southern Oman and Yemen. Habitat loss and hunting of both of leopard and prey species including gazelle Gazella gazella cora, ibex Capra nubiana and tahr Hemitragus jayakari over the last 50 years have forced the formerly wide-ranging Arabian leopard into small fragments of remote mountain habitat. The creation of the Jabal Samhan Nature Reserve in Dhofar was a first step towards the Arabian leopard’s protection. However, management and conservation efforts require additional input from ecological and social studies to provide the baseline data needed to prevent the threat of extinction in the wild. To this end Biosphere Expeditions has been working in collaboration with The Office of Conservation for the Environment, Diwan of Royal Court since 2006, carrying out Arabian leopard and prey surveys; firstly in Musandam (2006-2007) and subsequently in Dhofar (2008-2010). This report covers the survey work conducted in the January/February periods of 2009 and 2010, in the Wadi Uyun area of Dhofar. It also contains information gathered from the 2009 reconnaissance of Wadi Aydam, located in the Mudayy area, west of Uyun. Surveys within the 700 km2 research area, situated to the north and west of Salalah, covered varied topography from wadi floors to mountain ridges and escarpments. Vegetation cover ranged from absent to dense scrub and tree cover. The 2009 expedition identified important habitat biodiversity ‘hotspots’. All were linked to natural water sources. The threats to Arabian leopard and wildlife were investigated as were the threats they posed to local farmers. Interviews were carried out in the community to gauge peoples’ attitudes to conservation and wildlife. The 2010 expedition built on the 2009 results by surveying new areas and re-surveying and monitoring biodiversity hotspots. New camera trap models were trialed in six locations within Wadi Uyun. Capacity-building and education initiatives were part of both expeditions. Sign of Arabian leopard was found in 2009 and 2010, but was restricted to a small proportion of the research area. More sign and higher levels of leopard activity were recorded in 2010. Sign of caracal Caracal caracal, scarce in 2009, was almost absent in 2010. Arabian wolf Canis lupus arabis and striped hyaena Hyaena hyaena sign was more abundant in 2010, when both species were captured by camera trap. Although ibex were seen in 2010, sightings frequency suggests a decrease in relative abundance and an increase in poaching levels. There was an increase in gazelle sightings in 2010 and they were more abundant in Wadi Uyun than in 2009, but overall survey results showed a slight decrease in animals recorded. The hyrax Procavia capensis population was more abundant in 2010 than 2009. There was a notable increase in livestock damage and human disturbance in 2010. Evidence of illegal hunting, road-building, development, overgrazing and erosion caused by domestic livestock was increasingly apparent in 2010. Interviews with local people indicated that Arabian leopard numbers are declining and that their range and local distribution has decreased in recent years. Recommendations for further actions to inform decision-makers and enable effective conservation are set out in this report. ملخص يمثل النمر العربي رمز من رموز البيئة الجبلية في سلطنة عمان ، حيث أنه مهدد بالانقراَض بشكل خطير حسب الاتحاد الدولي لصون الطبيعة ومدرج أيضا في الملحق الأول من الاتفاقية الدولية سايتس والذي تحظر المتاجرة الدولية بالأنواع المهددة بالانقراَض. انقرض النمر العربي من معظم مناطق انتشاره في شبه الجزيرة العربية حيث تنحصر أعداده الحالية في جبال سلطنة عمان واليمن. يعتبر فقدان الموائل الطبيعية والصيد الجائر للنمر العربي وفرائسه كالغزال والوعل النوبي والطهر العربي في ما يزيد عن 50 سنة من الأسباب التي قلصت تواجد النمر الواسع النطاق سابقا إلى مناطق جبلية منعزلة. إنشاء محمية جبل سمحان الطبيعية في محافظة ظفار كانت أولى الخطوات التي تتخذ في سبيل حماية النمر العربي إلا أن الجهود المبذولة في تدابير الصون بحاجة إضافية لدارسات بيئية واجتماعية لتوفير المعلومات الأولية المطلوبة لمنع دون انقراض النمر من البرية. لهذا قامت بيوسفير أكسبديشنز بالتعاون مع مكتب حفظ البيئة بديوان البلاط السلطاني بالمسوحات الميدانية للنمر العربي وفرائسه منذ عام( 2006-2007) في جبال مسندم وفيما بعد في جبال ظفار منذ عام (2008-2010). يبين هذا التقرير أعمال المسح التي قامت بها بيوسفير اكسبديشنز في شهر يناير-فبراير( 2009-2010) في وادي عيون بمحافظة ظفار. التقرير يشمل أيضا معلومات لمسح استطلاعي في عام 2009م لوادي عيدم غرب وادي عيون. تم إجراء هذه المسوحات في المنطقة الواقعة شمال غرب صلالة حيث تبلغ مساحة المنطقة الممسوحة 700كم مربع وهي عبارة عن أودية وتلال جبلية ومنحدرات صخرية تنفرد بغطاء نباتي يتفاوت من معدوم إلى شبه كثيف. قامت الحملة باستقصاء التهديدات التي تواجه النمر والحياة الفطرية بشكل عام مع التحقيق في مخاطر هذه الحيوانات للرعاة في المنطقة. كما أجرت الحملة مقابلات مع السكان المحليين لتقيم وتحديد مواقفهم تجاه المحافظة على الحياة الفطرية تفيد نتائج الحملة لعام 2009م في التعرف على مناطق بيئية هامة للتنوع الفطري وهذا موصول للموارد المائية الطبيعية في المنطقة. ففي عام 2010م قامت الحملة بمسح مناطق جديدة مع إجراء رصد ومراقبة للمناطق الممسوحة في عام 2009م. تم أيضا تركيب عدد 6 كاميرات فخيه ضمن منطقة وادي عيون. بناء القدرات ومبادرات توعوية كان أيضا جزء من عمل الحملتين. تبين نتائج الحملة بوجود دلائل للنمر العربي في عام (2009-2010م ) ولكن هذه الدلائل كانت في جزءا صغير من منطقة المسح. أكثر دلائل لوجود النمر العربي ونشاطاته سجل في عام 2010م. دلائل لتواجد الوشق كانت شحيحة في عام 2009م بينما غالبا معدومة في عام 2010م. توضح النتائج أيضا بتواجد الذئب والضبع بوفرة في عام 2010م وهذا بسب تسجيل الكاميرات الفخية لهما. على الرغم من مشاهدات الوعل النوبي في عام 2010م نتائج المسح تشير إلى نقص في أعداد الوعول وارتفاع في نسبة الصيد غير الشرعي. الغزال العربي تم مشاهدته في عام 2010م حيث تشير النتائج إلى ارتفاع في نسبة المشاهدة مقارنة مع عام 2009م وأن أعداده أيضا أكثرة وفرة في وداي عيون من نتائج عام 2009م إلا أن النتائج الكلية للمسح توضح بوجود نقص طفيف في أعداد الغزال. الوبر الصخري كان أكثر كثافة في عام 2010م مقارنة مع عام 2009م. وتفيد النتائج أيضا بزيادة حجم الأضرار التي خلفتها المواشي والإزعاج البشري في عام 2010، حيث الدلائل عن الصيد غير القانوني وإنشاء الطرق والتنمية والرعي الجائر وتأكل التربة بسب المواشي والسكان كان أكثر وضوح في عام 2010م. في حين أشارت المقابلات مع السكان المحليين إلا أن أعداد النمر العربي قد تناقصت خاصة في السنوات الأخيرة. يعرض هذا التقرير في نهايته توصيات للعمل المستقبلي والتدابير الفعالة للحفاظ على النمر العربي.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Abstract The Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr has disappeared from much of its former range on the Arabian Peninsula so that today populations are limited to the most remote areas. Previous Biosphere Expeditions studies in 2006 and 2007 have suggested the existence of a remnant population on the Omani side of the Musandam peninsula. The Musandam peninsula is located south of the Strait of Hormus at the entrance of the Arabian Gulf on the northeastern tip of the Arabian Peninsula and as such forms an exclave of Oman bordered by the United Arab Emirates. The leopard population on the peninsula was thought to be very small and the lack of evidence of two important prey species, namely the Arabian tahr Hemitragus jayakari and gazelle Gazella gazella cora, and of the other top carnivore, the Arabian wolf Canis lupus arabs, provided a clear picture of the conditions under which leopard numbers have declined. The killing of animals, habitat degradation and livestock and human disturbance were the main causes of decline. Following on from this work, this report details the surveys conducted by Biosphere Expeditions in January and February 2008 in the area limited by the wadis Amat and Uyun, located in northwest Dhofar in southern Oman. The location is on the Arabian leopard’s northern distribution boundary in the Dhofar mountains, currently the last stronghold of the leopard in Oman. It is also where intensive studies on wild leopards are ongoing under the auspices of the Office for Conservation for the Environment, Diwan of Royal Court, including camera trapping and radio tracking of leopards. There was, however, a gap in the knowledge on the status of the leopard and its prey in the study area, and the mission of Biosphere Expeditions was to remove that information gap. The expedition surveyed the wadi floors, ledges, and ridges for signs of Arabian leopard, its prey species, and other wildlife that could provide information on habitat quality. Three camera traps were set by the end of the expedition and are still in place. Nine potential signs of leopards in the form of scats were collected resulting in a frequency of 0.067 scats per kilometre, but no recent evidence of the Arabian leopard’s presence was recorded. The habitat of the study area was, however, found to be in good condition. It had a rich assemblage of the main prey species and harboured a number of threatened large mammalian fauna. Signs of livestock overgrazing, so prevalent on the Musandam peninsula, were not found. The Nubian ibex Capra ibex nubiana, mountain gazelle Gazella gazella cora, and rock hyrax Procavia capensis were present in more than half of the fifty-one 2 x 2 km cells surveyed. Multiple records of hyaena Hyaena hyaena sultana, a predator with large resource requirements, corroborated the good quality of the habitat, as did the presence of caracal Caracal caracal schmitzi and Arabian wolf Canis lupus arabs. Interviews indicated that leopards were once encountered more frequently by herders and this finding supports the species’ loss of range mentioned in the literature and is compatible with the expected higher vulnerability of species’ along its distributional edge. In conclusion the report provides a number of recommendations regarding future research, capacity building, local community involvement, networking, information dissemination and compensation schemes which should be considered in order to provide the Arabian leopard with a chance to not only survive in Oman but to also re-colonise areas of its historical distribution range. ملخص انقرض النمر العربي من معظم مناطق عيشه في شبه الجزيرة العربية، وينحصر وجوده حاليًا في الأماكن النائية. وقد أشارت دراسات بيوسفير اكسبيديشنز السابقة في عامي 2006 و2007م إلى بقاء أعداد منها في الجهة العمانية من شبه جزيرة مسندم الواقعة جنوب مضيق هرمز عند المدخل إلى الخليج العربي على رأس شمال شرق شبه الجزيرة العربية. ومسندم محافظة عمانية معزولة ومحاطة بحدود دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة. وتشير الدلائل إلى وجود أعداد قليلة جداً من النمور في جبال مسندم، كما لم يتم الحصول على أدلة على وجود أهم فرائسه وهما الطهر العربي والغزال بالإضافة إلى عدم وجود حيوانات مفترسة أخرى كالذئب العربي مما يعطي صورة واضحة للأحوال التي تناقصت فيها أعداد النمور. وتعود الأسباب الرئيسة لهذا التناقص إلى صيد الحيوانات ومنافسة قطعان الماشية لمناطق عيشها والاستيطان البشري. ومتابعة لهذه الدراسات ، يبين هذا التقرير أعمال المسح التي قامت بها بيوسفير أكسبيديشنز في شهري يناير وفبراير 2008م في المنطقة الواقعة بين وادي عمات ووادي عيون في شمال غرب محافظة ظفار في جنوب السلطنة. ويمثل هذا الموقع الحدود الشمالية لمنطقة عيش النمور في جبال ظفار والتي تمثل الموطن الأخير للنمور في السلطنة. كما أنه المكان الذي تجري فيه دراسات مكثفة على النمور برعاية مكتب حفظ البيئة بديوان البلاط السلطاني والذي تم فيه استخدام الكاميرات الفخية وتتبع آثار النمور لاسلكياً عبر الأقمار الاصطناعية. وتساعد حملات بيوسفير أكسبيديشنز في إجراء المسوحات الميدانية للحصول على المعلومات حول وضع النمر وفرائسه. وقد قامت الحملة بمسح ميدانيا للأودية والمنحدرات والسلاسل الجبلية في المنطقة بحثاً عن مؤشرات للنمر العربي وفرائسه وأحياء برية أخرى والتي قد تساعد في الكشف عن جودة الموائل . وبنهاية الحملة تم وضع ثلاثة آلات تصوير فخية والتي لا تزال منصوبة بمواقعها. كما تم جمع تسع عينات براز محتملة للنمر تم العثور عليها على مسافات تقارب 0,067كم بين كل عينة وأخرى دون تسجيل دلائل حديثة على تواجد النمر العربي. أما موائل المنطقة المدروسة فكانت في حالة جيدة إذ احتوت على الفرائس الرئيسة بما فيها الثدييات الكبيرة, حيث آثار الرعي الجائر التي كانت واضحة في مسندم لم تكن موجودة. وأظهر المسح أن الوعل النوبي والغزال الجبلي والوبر الصخري لزالت موجودة في أكثر من نصف المساحات الممسوحة على شكل مربعات عددها 51 ومساحة كل منها 2×2 كم. كما أن التسجيلات المتعددة للضبع (أحد الحيوانات المفترسة الكبيرة) تؤيد جودة الموائل بالإضافة إلى وجود الوشق والذئب العربي. كذلك أشارت المقابلات إلى أن مواجهات الرعاة مع النمر كانت أكثر في الماضي مما يدعم ما نشر عن فقدان هذا الكائن لنطاق حركته وتعرضه للمخاطر في المناطق التي يجوبها. وفي خاتمة التقرير قائمة بالتوصيات الأساسية في مجالات البحوث وبناء القدرات ومشاركة السكان المحليين وشبكات التواصل ونشر الوعي وبرامج التعويض التي ينبغي أتباعها لإتاحة الفرصة للنمر العربي للبقاء ليس في عُمان فحسب ولكن ليعود للعيش في المناطق التي كانت مرتعًا له في الماضي والموضحة في التقرير .
Article
Full-text available
We compared the effectiveness of various methods for surveying medium and large wild mammals in southern Oman. Working with volunteers recruited by Biosphere Expeditions, wildlife professionals and local rangers, we used direct observation, camera traps, sign surveys (tracks and/or dung) and molecular scatology to study 66 sampling units of 2 × 2 km (grid cells) in an area of 32 × 36 km during a 4-week period in February–March 2011. Sixteen mammal species were recorded, and the largest numbers of species were recorded by sign surveys and camera traps (both n = 9); sign surveys, direct sightings and DNA scatology recorded species across the largest number of grid cells. For species with a sample size large enough for comparison (i.e. detected in ≥ 8 grid cells), DNA scatology proved most effective for detecting caracal Caracal caracal , signs for hyaena Hyaena hyaena , ibex Capra nubiana , porcupine Hystrix indica and hyrax Procavia capensis , and signs and direct sightings for mountain gazelle Gazella gazella . Clustering, in which records from multiple methods are either adjacent or overlapping, was highest (≥ 76%) for the wolf Canis lupus , porcupine, ibex and gazelle. Our results indicate the best methods to detect and record the distributions of individual species in the study area, and demonstrate the advantage of using multiple methods to reduce the risk of false absences or partial detections. Our findings also highlight the potential of clustering as a means of cross-checking results of observations that are skill-dependent, which is particularly useful when employing a large workforce.
Article
Full-text available
The leopard’s (Panthera pardus) broad geographic range, remarkable adaptability, and secretive nature have contributed to a misconception that this species might not be severely threatened across its range. We find that not only are several subspecies and regional populations critically endangered but also the overall range loss is greater than the average for terrestrial large carnivores. To assess the leopard’s status, we compile 6,000 records at 2,500 locations from over 1,300 sources on its historic (post 1750) and current distribution. We map the species across Africa and Asia, delineating areas where the species is confirmed present, is possibly present, is possibly extinct or is almost certainly extinct. The leopard now occupies 25-37% of its historic range, but this obscures important differences between subspecies. Of the nine recognized subspecies, three (P. p. pardus, fusca, and saxicolor) account for 97% of the leopard’s extant range while another three (P. p. orientalis, nimr, and japonensis) have each lost as much as 98% of their historic range. Isolation, small patch sizes, and few remaining patches further threaten the six subspecies that each have less than 100,000 km2 of extant range. Approximately 17% of extant leopard range is protected, although some endangered subspecies have far less. We found that while leopard research was increasing, research effort was primarily on the subspecies with the most remaining range whereas subspecies that are most in need of urgent attention were neglected.
Article
Full-text available
Little is known about the current presence of the Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr in the Nejd region of Dhofar Mountains. We report here the first camera trapping records of this critically endangered subspecies in Wadi Amat. The northward draining valleys of the Dhofar Mountains, known as the Nejd, would once have been part of the range of the Arabian leopard. However, in the 1980s as the area was increasingly utilized by people and their livestock, disturbance and illegal killing seemed to have pushed the remaining leopards southwards towards the southern escarpment of the Dhofar Mountains. However, by the early 2000s the local people, except for a few camel herders, had moved from the area and settled in nearby villages. This may have provided an opportunity for the return of wildlife including the Arabian leopard to their former ranges in parts of the Nejd.
Article
A high proportion of Arabian leopard killings can be attributed to livestock protection. In the process of catching goats, sheep, young camels or other domestic animals, leopards often interfere with human activities and are considered by livestock farmers as direct competitors. With the ongoing decrease of natural prey species, such as Nubian ibex, rock hyrax, Arabian mountain gazelles and cape hare, leopards are now having to shift their diet to livestock. This naturally increases their unpopularity amongst most livestock farmers whom they come into direct, or indirect, contact with. In most cases, leopards are considered a threat for humans. As a result, leopards are hunted within all of their natural range and with different methods, such as trapping and poisoning. In the early part of the 1980s, it was common to use anticoagulant rat killer for poisoning; however, this stopped in 1985. Today, however, other poisons are used by shepherds to kill predators, which include leopards. A total of 52 known incidences of Arabian leopard poisoning have been recorded in Saudi Arabia from the early nineteenth century to February 2014. Shepherds poison the carcasses of domestic sheep, goats, camel or donkeys thought to have been killed by predators such Arabian wolf, striped hyena or stray dogs and, invariably, it is the elusive Arabian leopard who tends to eat these carcasses. The population of Arabian leopards in Saudi Arabia has almost been wiped out and exists in extremely low numbers in remote mountain ranges. A national leopard strategy and action plan known as the Saudi Leopard Conservation Plan has been developed to protect them from extinction, but further field research and public awareness-raising with regards to banning poisoning or killing the species is absolutely necessary to ensure their survival.