ArticlePublisher preview available

Security vulnerability assessments for sustainable infrastructure: a scientometric review

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Security vulnerability assessments are crucial for the sustainable development of critical infrastructure amid intensifying global environmental and socio-economic challenges. This study employs a scientometric analysis of 247 bibliographic records from the Web of Science database (2002–2022) to explore research trends and developments. A novel contribution is the mapping of research priorities before and after the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) declaration, illustrating a shift from "critical infrastructure" to "resilience," a perspective not comprehensively addressed in prior reviews. Using CiteSpace, the study identifies key research clusters, collaborative networks, and keyword evolutions, providing a robust, quantitative depiction of the field’s intellectual structure. The research highlights the significant roles of the USA, Italy, and China, and the influence of journals like Reliability Engineering and System Safety and Natural Hazards. It uncovers underexplored areas such as the integration of GIS, artificial intelligence, and digital twins into vulnerability assessments, positioning the research to tackle contemporary challenges, particularly climate change adaptation. These findings offer valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of infrastructure sustainability and resilience. The study emphasizes the necessity of cross-disciplinary collaborations and innovations, guiding future research and policy-making to strengthen infrastructure protection in a rapidly changing global context. This comprehensive knowledge mapping provides actionable insights for policymakers, academics, and practitioners aiming to develop robust, sustainable infrastructure strategies.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Environment, Development and Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06029-2
REVIEW
Security vulnerability assessments forsustainable
infrastructure: ascientometric review
Wofai O. Ewa1,2 · Onuegbu O. Ugwu3
Received: 8 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2025
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2025
Abstract
Security vulnerability assessments are crucial for the sustainable development of critical
infrastructure amid intensifying global environmental and socio-economic challenges.
This study employs a scientometric analysis of 247 bibliographic records from the Web
of Science database (2002–2022) to explore research trends and developments. A novel
contribution is the mapping of research priorities before and after the 2015 United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) declaration, illustrating a shift from "critical infra-
structure" to "resilience," a perspective not comprehensively addressed in prior reviews.
Using CiteSpace, the study identifies key research clusters, collaborative networks, and
keyword evolutions, providing a robust, quantitative depiction of the field’s intellectual
structure. The research highlights the significant roles of the USA, Italy, and China, and
the influence of journals like Reliability Engineering and System Safety and Natural Haz-
ards. It uncovers underexplored areas such as the integration of GIS, artificial intelligence,
and digital twins into vulnerability assessments, positioning the research to tackle con-
temporary challenges, particularly climate change adaptation. These findings offer valu-
able insights into the evolving dynamics of infrastructure sustainability and resilience.
The study emphasizes the necessity of cross-disciplinary collaborations and innovations,
guiding future research and policy-making to strengthen infrastructure protection in a rap-
idly changing global context. This comprehensive knowledge mapping provides actionable
insights for policymakers, academics, and practitioners aiming to develop robust, sustain-
able infrastructure strategies.
Keywords Vulnerability assessment· Sustainable development· Infrastructure security·
Climate adaptation· Resilience· Scientometric analysis
* Wofai O. Ewa
wofaiewa@yahoo.com
1 Department ofCivil Engineering, Faculty ofEngineering, University ofCross River State,
Calabar, CrossRiverState, Nigeria
2 Construction Engineering, Project Management andSustainability Research Group, Department
ofCivil Engineering, Faculty ofEngineering, University ofCross River State, Calabar,
CrossRiverState, Nigeria
3 Department ofCivil Engineering, Faculty ofEngineering andTechnology, Alex Ekwueme Federal
University, NdufuAlikeIkwo, EbonyiState, Nigeria
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Bibliometric analysis is vital for identifying gaps and potential research directions. The importance of bibliometric analysis in identifying research gaps and prospective future research endeavours is addressed in this study. This study aims to provide insight into the crucial role that bibliometric analysis plays in identifying research gaps and potential future research orientations. This study demonstrates how bibliometric analysis can assist researchers in identifying new study prospects, avoiding duplication of effort, and ensuring effective resource utilisation. This study also offers future bibliometric analysis modifications to overcome its limitations, including cross-disciplinary indicators and data-sharing standards. Several previous studies adopted bibliometric analysis to identify developing issues and trends, directing future research and pointing to places where new insights and contributions were also emphasised. Based on this study, bibliometric analysis is an effective tool for identifying research gaps and prospective new areas for future research. Adding to this, researchers must be conscious of its limitations and apply other methodologies to support their more profound understanding of a particular topic that they have researched. In conclusion, this study has comprehensively enhanced our understanding of the crucial facets of bibliometric analysis in scientific research.
Article
Full-text available
Human-technology interaction is concerned with trust as an inevitable user acceptance requirement. As the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics emerge in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, there is an immediate need to study trust in such systems. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of the literature published in the last two decades on (1) trust in AI and AI-powered robotics and (2) AI and robotics applications in the AEC industry. Through a thorough analysis, common trust dimensions are identified and the connections to the existing AEC applications are determined and discussed. Furthermore, major future directions on trustworthy AI and robotics in AEC research and practice are outlined. Findings indicate that although AEC researchers and industry professionals increasingly study and deploy AI and robotics, there is a lack of systematic research that studies key trust dimensions such as explainability, reliability, robustness, performance, and safety in the AEC context
Article
Full-text available
Bibliometric data are relatively simple and describe objective processes of publishing articles and citing others. It seems quite straightforward to define reasonable measures of a researcher's productivity, research quality, or overall performance based on these data. Why do we still have no acceptable bibliometric measures of scientific performance? Instead, there are hundreds of indicators with nobody knowing how to use them. At the same time, an increasing number of researchers and some research fields have been excluded from the standard bibliometric analysis to avoid manifestly contradictive conclusions. I argue that the current biggest problem is the inadequate rule of credit allocation for multiple authored articles in mainstream bibliometrics. Clinging to this historical choice excludes any systematic and logically consistent bibliometrics-based evaluation of researchers, research groups, and institutions. During the last 50 years, several authors have called for a change. Apparently, there are no serious methodologically justified or evidence-based arguments in the favor of the present system. However, there are intractable social, psychological, and economical issues that make adoption of a logically sound counting system almost impossible.
Article
A smart and sustainable drainage system is strongly dependent on appropriate functioning of sewer pipelines existing within the infrastructure of cities’ networks. Although numerous studies have been conducted on the sewer networks, the existing body of literature lacks a comprehensive review paper that contains scientometric analysis, critical review, and meta-analysis in one holistic frame. To fill this gap, this paper provides a review of sewer deterioration models and factors causing sewer pipeline deterioration through a hybrid review approach. Having meticulously reviewed the studies undertaken hitherto using the adopted hybrid review approach, the following conclusions are noted: (1) The meta-analysis results indicate that the most important factors impacting sewer pipeline deterioration include operational defect, pipe shape, pipe material, waste type, structural defect, and hydraulic conditions, (2) Factors and defects that cause sewer deterioration have a varying degree of impact on the deterioration process; a good understanding of their individual impact will improve the sewer infrastructure performance and save cost, and (3) Countries from Africa, South America, the Middle East, and Asia are lagging in this research area, although there might be some justification for this, such as availability of funds and research priority. Sewer infrastructure is an important part of the environment, and keen attention needs to be given to it; therefore, there is a need for more international research collaborations. The findings obtained from this review paper are expected to facilitate the adoption of sagacious policies by the concerned decision-makers, paving the way for realizing smarter and more sustainable cities.
Article
Hurricanes are among the most devastating natural disasters in the United States, causing billions of dollars of property damage and insured losses. During extreme wind events, unsecured objects in jobsites can easily become airborne debris, which results in substantial loss to construction projects and neighboring communities. Towards a systematic disaster preparedness in construction jobsites, this paper presents a novel vision-based digital twinning and threat assessment framework. We encode the context of disaster risk into deep-learning architectures to identify and analyze the characteristics and impacts of potential wind-borne debris in construction site digital twin models. Case studies on nine piles of construction materials are presented to demonstrate and discuss the fidelity of the proposed computational modules. The proposed methods are expected to help provide heads up for practitioners to quickly recognize, localize, and assess potential wind-borne derbies in construction jobsites, and thereby implementing hurricane preparedness in an effective and timely manner.
Article
The exponentially growing contribution of renewable energy sources in the electricity mix requires large systems for energy storage to tackle resources intermittency. In this context, the technologies for hydrogen production offer a clean and versatile alternative to boost renewables penetration and energy security. Hydrogen production as a strategy for the decarbonization of the energy sources mix has been investigated since the beginning of the 1990s. The stationary sector, i.e. all parts of the economy excluding the transportation sector, accounts for almost three-quarters of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions (mass of CO2-eq) in the world associated with power generation. While several publications focus on the hybridization of renewables with traditional energy storage systems or in different pathways of hydrogen use (mainly power-to-gas), this study provides an insightful analysis of the state of art and evolution of renewable hydrogen-based systems (RHS) to power the stationary sector. The analysis started with a thorough review of RHS deployments for power-to-power stationary applications, such as in power generation, industry, residence, commercial building, and critical infrastructure. Then, a detailed evaluation of relevant techno-economic parameters such as levelized cost of energy (LCOE), hydrogen roundtrip efficiency (HRE), loss of power supply probability (LPSP), self-sufficiency ratio (SSR), or renewable fraction (fRES) is provided. Subsequently, lab-scale plants and pilot projects together with current market trends and commercial uptake of RHS and fuel cell systems are examined. Finally, the future techno-economic barriers and challenges for short and medium-term deployment of RHS are identified and discussed.
Article
Flood risk management (FRM) in coastal cities is a challenging task due to uncertain climate hazards under sea-level rise (SLR) and large-scale vulnerable buildings within the floodplain. This study presents a building-level adaptation framework to evaluate alternative community adaptation strategies relying on cloud computing. We incorporated multiple sources of model uncertainties and randomly generated storm surges in each year of simulation using the extreme value distribution (GEV) theory. Based on a case study in Miami-Dade County, Florida, four adaptation scenarios were designed to evaluate their effectiveness in adaptation. Our sensitivity analysis suggested a positive linear relationship between community flood risk reduction and total community adaptation costs in the life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) model. Our results showed that uncertainties of the total community damage based on the LCCB model ranges from 221millionto221 million to 2.75 billion. However, when considering social vulnerability, the total community damage increased substantially, ranging from 244millionto244 million to 3.44 billion. Nevertheless, a 6ft public seawall based on the upper bound of the GEV distribution with the enforced building elevation policy in flood zones could substantially reduce community flood damage under uncertain sea-level rises.
Article
There have long been numerous efforts to achieve a realistic and practical integration of sustainability and resilience into the building designs from various perspectives in either academia or industry. Despite introducing several pathways in this regard, this integration tends to be interfered by the expert opinions and result in a subjective final solution. An example of such pathways is the criteria-based green rating systems. To overcome this challenge this integration can be structured in the form of an optimization problem to objectively spot a set of trade-offs among various sustainability and resilience aspects. These aspects should be in a quantitative form known as indicators. To this end, the present study aims at finding the most-suited indicators each can justify some sustainability and resilience aspects through a comprehensive systematic literature review framework. The main focus of this study is on the building energy domain according to its vital role in global energy consumption to help to reach a design that is not only energy-optimized but also sustainable and resilient. Therefore, all found indicators in this study are directly tied to the building energy domain. The findings of this study can help designers to select the desired sustainability and resilience indicators from the resulting list ready to be applied in an optimization structure to achieve an objective integration of sustainability and resilience into the building energy domain.
Article
Water Distribution Networks (WDNs) ensure reliable water supply to consumers which depends largely on joint and well-coordinated functioning of all diverse facets and components of the WDN. Failure of a vital component has catastrophic consequences and could impair the overall performance of the distribution system. This study presents an integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework that couples selected topological, hydraulic and water quality parameters to holistically assess nodal vulnerability of WDNs even under conflicting priority ranking of the methods considered. Within this framework, we harmonize the unique strengths of Closeness Centrality, Demand Adjusted Closeness Centrality and a Water Quality Index to accurately characterize the vulnerability of demand nodes. The proposed framework is validated on two case studies. The results indicate the ability of the integrated framework to accurately rank demand nodes, differentiate between nodes with the same base demand and distinguish between sink nodes based on water quality. The vulnerability indexes presented by the framework cannot be exhaustively explained by any of the original methods, an indication that the integrated framework provides new information in vulnerability analysis of WDNs. The framework could serve as a tool for water engineers in the analysis of critical nodes, scheduling of maintenance strategies and the assessment of failure impact on water distribution networks.