ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Industry 4.0 technologies radically change industrial processes. National governments have enacted innovation policies to support firms’ investments in new technologies and increase productivity growth. The Italian Industry 4.0 Plan (II4.0 Plan) was implemented with this purpose in 2017 and consisted of a horizontal fiscal plan. Using a new methodology that relies on firms’ financial accounts rather than survey data, we identify firms that benefited from the II4.0 Plan’s incentives and extend the analysis to the population of Italian firms. The results from a Difference-in-Differences regression approach show that the investments spurred by the II4.0 Plan positively affect firms’ labour productivity but heterogeneously among size classes, sectors and type of incentive. Hyper and super amortization and the credit for innovation drive the results. We frame our policy evaluation into the most recent discussion about innovation policies, raising some criticisms on the appropriateness of horizontal policies to foster digital transformation.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
The Journal of Technology Transfer
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10179-2
Innovation policies andfirms’ productivity: theItalian
Industry 4.0 Plan fordigital transformation
ElenaCes1,2 · StefaniaScrofani2 · MatteoTubiana3
Accepted: 6 December 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025
Abstract
Industry 4.0 technologies radically change industrial processes. National governments have
enacted innovation policies to support firms’ investments in new technologies and increase
productivity growth. The Italian Industry 4.0 Plan (II4.0 Plan) was implemented with this
purpose in 2017 and consisted of a horizontal fiscal plan. Using a new methodology that
relies on firms’ financial accounts rather than survey data, we identify firms that benefited
from the II4.0 Plan’s incentives and extend the analysis to the population of Italian firms.
The results from a Difference-in-Differences regression approach show that the invest-
ments spurred by the II4.0 Plan positively affect firms’ labour productivity but heterogene-
ously among size classes, sectors and type of incentive. Hyper and super amortization and
the credit for innovation drive the results. We frame our policy evaluation into the most
recent discussion about innovation policies, raising some criticisms on the appropriateness
of horizontal policies to foster digital transformation.
Keywords Innovation policies· Industry 4.0· Digital transformation· Labour
productivity· Financial statement analysis
JEL Classification O38· O39
1 Introduction
Economies and societies change, adapt and develop through innovations. Innovation
derives from the interaction of different actors and organisations, and how innovations
shape and impact the economy and society depends on the technologies involved (Fager-
berg etal., 2006). Currently, societies are experiencing the impact of digital technologies
enabling the fourth industrial revolution. Industry 4.0 is based on nine technological pil-
lars: Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Big Data and Analytics,
* Matteo Tubiana
matteo.tubiana@polito.it
1 University ofBergamo, Bergamo, Italy
2 Sant’Anna School ofAdvanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
3 Polytechnic ofTorino, Torino, Italy
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Industry 4.0 represents a significant shift in industrial practices, presenting unique opportunities to improve manufacturing via advanced digital technologies and sustainable processes. The rapid growth of Industry 4.0 research has uncovered a significant knowledge gap and emphasized the need for studies adopting dynamic and longitudinal perspectives to understand this field’s evolution comprehensively. This study meticulously analyzes 10,176 articles to investigate the thematic evolution and knowledge transfer mechanisms within Industry 4.0. The examination reveals four distinct sub-periods, each characterized by thematic transitions, starting with foundational themes such as simulation and cyber-physical systems, progressing to later focuses on cloud computing, convolutional neural networks, and digital twin technologies. As research progresses, themes like production facilities, monitoring, and security highlight the shift towards automation, real-time monitoring, and strong data security measures. Five primary thematic domains are identified: (1) core enablers of sustainable smart manufacturing, (2) innovation and strategic transformation, (3) smart and secure manufacturing systems, (4) advanced data-driven manufacturing technologies, and (5) AI-driven real-time monitoring and production. These domains illustrate a transition from fundamental enablers like the Internet of Things (IoT) to more intricate AI-based applications. The main path analysis indicates a shift in emphasis, moving from essential digital integration towards sustainability, digital transformation, and resource efficiency applications. The findings reveal significant implications and highlight Industry 4.0 as a driving force for sustainable and resilient industrial ecosystems.
Chapter
This study examines how European Union member countries, plus the United Kingdom, have approached the common challenge of digital transformation within their respective national contexts, answering the call of the Digitising European Industry Initiative. They have implemented diverse policy designs tailored to the characteristics of their National Systems of Innovation, addressing different priorities, despite the shared pillars emphasised by the Digitising European Industry Initiative and the prevalence of SMEs in the industry. This chapter investigates the differences in the national policy designs for digitalisation and Industry 4.0 in Europe by comparing the policies, examining the implemented policy designs, identifying specific country features influencing such designs and clustering these policies according to their priorities and scopes.
Article
Full-text available
This study examines the effect of artificial intelligence on unemployment in high-tech developed countries. While artificial intelligence is more discussed in futuristic aspects, comprehensive empirical studies are limited in the literature. Therefore, this study uses the dataset, which includes 24 high-tech developed countries from 2005 to 2021 and examines the relationship between a country's Google Trend Index related to AI and the unemployment rate. In the empirical approach, we control the dynamic effect of unemployment by using dynamic panel data and GMM-system estimation to determine the effect of AI on unemployment. The main results show that artificial intelligence decreases the level of unemployment, and the ‘displacement effect’ of AI is validated.
Preprint
Full-text available
New digital technologies can generate substantial gains for adopting businesses. In this paper we analyse the impact of new technologies associated with the Industry 4.0 paradigm on labour productivity, average wages and sales growth. The analysis is based on microdata produced by the Italian National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP) on a large representative sample of Italian firms. We merge INAPP data with Orbis data covering the period 2010–2014-2018. By applying a Diff-in-Diff methodology, we show that the economic size of the effect of new technologies on productivity and sales is approximately twice as large as the effect on average wages. The positive impact is stronger for small and medium-size firms, even though the effects appear to be concentrated among more mature rather than younger firms and are heterogeneaous along the distributions. Results are robust to unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity issues.
Article
In recent years, a new frame for innovation policy has emerged, namely “transformative innovation policy” (TIP), which aims at addressing transformative change or “Grand Challenges”. Such a shift in policy theory should, ideally, be reflected in policy evaluation, but the literature has so far provided little advice on how to address TIP-related evaluation challenges such as directionality and system-level behavioural additionality. This paper discusses how the evaluation of policy interventions targeting system innovation can be designed to address these challenges. Combining the literature on sustainability transitions with policy evaluation, we propose an integrated evaluation framework composed of three main components: (i) programme theory (programme goals, systems boundaries and desired (or accepted) development paths); (ii) system analysis (transformative outcomes); and (iii) synthesis and overall assessment (including revision of programme theory). By integrating the two sets of literature, we provide a bridge between academic research on transitions and current evaluation practices. We briefly illustrate the applicability of the integrated framework in the BioInnovation Strategic Innovation Programme in Sweden.
Article
R&D incentives are a popular policy option to encourage private R&D worldwide. This paper provides an updated survey of R&D incentives’ effect on private R&D investment, including evaluations from developing countries. It assesses the pattern of R&D incentives, and reviews recent literature on the efficacy of these incentives. It reveals that R&D incentives generally increase private R&D, but to a varying extent depending on incentive types, countries’ income levels, industry and firm characteristics, and the design and implementation of the incentives. Overall, variability of the effect on private R&D is greater for direct incentives than indirect incentives. The effect of indirect incentives is found to be smaller in developing countries than developed countries, contrary to the predictions of growth theory. This paper investigates the potential reasons for these findings and summarizes policy implications for governments considering upgrading or adopting R&D incentives.
Article
This paper provides firm-level evidence on how subsidies to buyers of advanced digital production technologies work in sustaining private investments in innovation, and how such investments correlate with firms’ demand for labor. By exploiting the introduction in 2017 of a fiscal incentive granted to all Italian companies purchasing tangible goods instrumental to their digital transformation, we are able to quantify the volume of the subsidized investments within the national economy, to correlate the decision to invest with ex-ante structural and strategic characteristics of the beneficiary firms, and to evaluate the labor market effects (hirings and separations) of these investments at the firm level, for different classes of workers and firms. Overall, the analysis suggests that the policy has been so far an effective means to support the advanced digital technology transformation of the Italian production system and that such transformation has been positively correlated with employment growth at investing firms.