ArticlePDF Available

A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database between 1990-2024

Authors:
  • Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

Mathematical modelling is an approach to bridge real-world problems into mathematics as an effort to improve students’ mathematical literacy. The purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of published articles related to mathematical modelling in elementary school. This research uses bibliometric analysis method. This study used the Scopus database scanned with the keywords “mathematical modelling” and “elementary school” with a time span of 1990-2024 obtained as many as 78 articles. The data collected was then analyzed using R-software and VOSviewer applications. The results of this study found that the development trend of mathematical modelling research in elementary schools significantly increased after 2015-2023 with a percentage of 67.95%. The top researchers who have the most influence are dominated by authors from Germany and Denmark. Furthermore, in recent years the dominant topics in mathematical modelling research studies in elementary schools such as mathematical modelling cycle, development, mathematical modelling competency, mathematical concept, mathematical knowledge, modeling process, mathematical modelling task, empirical study, and creative thinking. It is hoped that future research can focus on the literature of mathematical modelling carried out on the subject of high school to college level and include analysis on the literature in the years 1960-1990 which is the campaign period and the early years of integrating mathematical modelling into the curriculum of various countries in the world.
EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2025, 21(2), em2577
ISSN:1305-8223 (online)
OPEN ACCESS Review Article https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15916
© 2025 by the authors; licensee Modestum. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
hardianmf@gmail.com (*Correspondence) aritamarini@unj.ac.id suyono@unj.ac.id
A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the
Scopus database between 1990-2024
Hardian Mei Fajri 1* , Arita Marini 1 , Suyono 2
1 Department of Basic Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, East Jakarta, INDONESIA
2 Department of Master of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, East
Jakarta, INDONESIA
Received 07 October 2024 Accepted 09 January 2025
Abstract
Mathematical modelling is an approach to bridge real-world problems into mathematics as an
effort to improve students mathematical literacy. The purpose of this study is to conduct a
bibliometric analysis of published articles related to mathematical modelling in elementary school.
This research uses bibliometric analysis method. This study used the Scopus database scanned
with the keywords mathematical modelling and elementary school with a time span of 1990-
2024 obtained as many as 78 articles. The data collected was then analyzed using R-software and
VOSviewer applications. The results of this study found that the development trend of
mathematical modelling research in elementary schools significantly increased after 2015-2023
with a percentage of 67.95%. The top researchers who have the most influence are dominated by
authors from Germany and Denmark. Furthermore, in recent years the dominant topics in
mathematical modelling research studies in elementary schools such as mathematical modelling
cycle, development, mathematical modelling competency, mathematical concept, mathematical
knowledge, modeling process, mathematical modelling task, empirical study, and creative
thinking. It is hoped that future research can focus on the literature of mathematical modelling
carried out on the subject of high school to college level and include analysis on the literature in
the years 1960-1990 which is the campaign period and the early years of integrating mathematical
modelling into the curriculum of various countries in the world.
Keywords: a bibliometric study, mathematical modelling, elementary schools
INTRODUCTION
Mathematical modelling is a promising research
study and learning approach to be implemented at every
level of education. Although modelling has been taught
informally for centuries, mathematical modelling has
only recently emerged formally in education (Spooner,
2024). Campaigns to incorporate mathematical
modelling into the curriculum began in the 1960s
(Pollak, 2007; Stillman, 2019) and 1970s (Dindyal & Kaur,
2010; Kaiser et al., 2010). Until finally in the 1980s,
mathematical modelling was included in the curriculum
of several countries in the world such as the United
States, the Netherlands, Germany, Australia, Europe,
Brazil, Denmark, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and
New Zealand (Spooner, 2024; Stillman et al., 2013; Tran
et al., 2020). It shows that mathematical modelling has
been accepted at the international level because it has an
important contribution to mathematics education
(Kaiser, 2020; Stillman et al., 2020a).
The study of teaching and learning mathematical
modelling has grown to the extent that it has become a
research field in its own right within the mathematics
education community (Blomhø, 2019; Stillman & Brown,
2019). However, it was not until the 1990s that
mathematical modelling in mathematics education
became a research field, where empirical studies began
to develop (Niss et al., 2007). Mathematical modelling
plays an important role in mathematics education
worldwide and has been integrated into curricula and
academic standards (Alwast & Vorholter, 2022; Kaiser,
2020).
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
2 / 12
In general, mathematical modelling is understood as
the transition or process of translating the context of real-
world situations into the mathematical world to be
solved (Hartmann et al., 2023; Krawitz et al., 2022;
Ledezma et al., 2024) until a reasonable solution is
obtained (Stillman, 2019). Mathematical modelling
activities begin with a real-world problem situation in
which the modeler (or problem solver) uses a
mathematical perspective to solve the problem (Chan et
al., 2019). Mathematical modelling activities present
open-ended problems (Bliss & Libertini, 2019; Caron
2019; Chan et al., 2019; Geiger et al., 2022; Lesh &
Zawojeski, 2007; Maaß, 2007).
Modelers can generalize the developed mathematical
models to other similar contexts (Chan et al., 2019).
Actively carrying out mathematical modelling involves
several processes, which are often put together in the
form of or described by the so-called mathematical
modelling cycle (Jankvist & Niss, 2020; Schukajlow et al.,
2023). A now well-known and phenomenal modelling
cycle that is the result of DISUM-project is Blums (2010)
7-step modelling cycle, which is used for cognitive
analysis of tasks and also for diagnosing students real
solution processes (Blum & Schukajlow, 2018). The
integration of mathematical modelling is expected to be
applied to elementary school students (Stohlmann &
Albarracín, 2016). In addition to introducing and
training students mathematical modelling process. It
also gives experience to students so that they can become
independent modelers in solving real situation problems
(Fajri et al., 2022).
When looking to conduct research studies related to
mathematical modelling, bibliometric analysis can be
used as a useful tool to identify trends and scientific
evolution of different research fields over a period of
time (Cevikbas et al., 2024; Do et al., 2021; Hallinger &
Chatpinyakoop, 2019; Lozada et al., 2021; Pham-Duc et
al., 2021; Yamaguchi et al., 2023). This method makes it
possible to analyze hundreds or even thousands of
pieces of literature (Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017). What is
very difficult for researchers to do if using the traditional
literature review method (Hallinger & Chatpinyakoop,
2019; Öztürk et al., 2024; Prieto-Jiménez et al., 2021).
Bibliometrics is an important tool to assess and analyze
published scientific literature from a quantitative point
of view (Verma et al., 2021). Helps identify hot research
topics and trends (Song et al., 2019). Provides data
analysis in the form of citation indices to assess the
reputation and influence of specific articles, authors, and
research publications (Julius et al., 2021). And predict
successful and sustainable research in the future (Geng
et al., 2017).
Bibliometric analysis contains many features to map
information such as network structure, keywords,
publications, references, journals, authors in the research
field being analyzed (Aria & Cuccurullo, 2022). In
addition, bibliometric analysis provides accurate,
reliable, and accountable analysis (Aria & Cuccurullo,
2017; Behl et al., 2022; Cevikbas et al., 2024). Helps gain
valuable insights into key topics and emerging trends,
thereby guiding future research directions and
considerations (Cevikbas et al., 2024). As well as
providing promising opportunities in pinpointing
research gaps (Schryen & Sperling, 2023). In addition,
bibliometric analysis is currently receiving increasing
attention as a tool in conducting literature reviews
(Öztürk et al., 2024).
Several previous studies have used bibliometric
analysis of various research areas such as management
(Block & Fisch, 2020; Lin et al., 2024), education and
sustainable development (Hallinger & Chatpinyakoop,
2019; Prieto-Jiménez et al. 2021), use of technology in
higher education (Díaz-García et al., 2022; Shen & Ho,
2020; Sobral, 2020), social sciences (Mervar & Jokić, 2022;
Nasir et al., 2020), STEAM (Jantakun et al., 2024;
Karampelas, 2023; Marín-Marín et al., 2021), and
mathematics education (Cevikbas et al., 2024; Gokce &
Guner, 2021; Julius et al., 2021; Yig, 2022).
But in reality, bibliometric research is still rarely
carried out, especially in the field of mathematics
education research (Drijvers et al., 2020; Julius et al.,
2021). Based on the results of the researchers review of
several literature studies on the Scopus database, Web of
Science database, and Google Scholar database, there is
no literature study that conducts bibliometric analysis on
the topic of mathematical modelling at the elementary
school level. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to
conduct a bibliometric analysis of published articles
related to mathematical modelling in elementary schools
Contribution to the literature
This article contributes to the field of education by presenting a comprehensive insight into the topic of
mathematical modeling research, especially at the elementary school level, based on the Scopus database
for more than three decades (1990-2024).
Mathematical modeling is a promising learning approach to be implemented at various levels of
education, as well as a potential research study topic. Especially for strengthening students' mathematical
literacy skills.
The results of this research analysis can be a valuable reference for policy makers, researchers and
academics for future educational practices.
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2025, 21(2), em2577
3 / 12
in the Scopus database from 1990 to 2024. Specifically,
the research questions (RQs) in this study are, as follows:
RQ1. What is the total volume and growth trend of
publications in the mathematical modelling in
elementary school literature in the Scopus
database from 1990 to 2024?
RQ2. Which researchers and research groups have
the most influence on the mathematical
modelling in elementary schools literature in
the Scopus database 1990-2024?
RQ3. Which publication sources had the most
impact on the mathematical modelling in
elementary schools literature in the Scopus
database 1990-2024?
RQ4. What are the popular research topic trends in
mathematical modelling in elementary school
literature in the Scopus database 1990-2024?
METHOD
The method used in this research is bibliometric
analysis by using the R-software and VOSviewer
application tools. In concrete terms, bibliometrics is a
research method used to study or analyze research based
on scientific publications stored or indexed in big
database bibliographies (Gutiérrez-Salcedoet al., 2018).
Bibliometric analysis has been recognized as a method
that has proven effective in analyzing scientific literature
(Do et al., 2021; Ha et al., 2020; Kondrashev et al., 2024;
Pham et al., 2023). Bibliometrics is a field of library and
information science research that studies bibliographic
materials such as research publications, authors, country
contributions, and others using a quantitative approach
(Verma et al., 2021).
In addition, articles published in scientific journals
can be a source of information and data for research such
as bibliometric analysis (Kartika et al., 2023).
Bibliometric analysis helps researchers identify research
trends in a certain period (Do et al., 2021). Which is
presented systematically, transparently, and
accountability (Behl et al., 2022).
This study analyzed 78 Scopus indexed documents
using the help of R-software and VOSviewer
applications. The data collection process in this research
uses the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews
and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as a guide in
identification, screening and eligibility, included in the
analyzed literature review (Cevikbas et al., 2024; Page et
al., 2021). As well as to ensure quality in processing
literature searches (Moher et al., 2010). In the
identification stage, document searches use the Scopus
database with keywords: TITLE-ABS-KEY
(mathematical modelling and elementary school) in
the time range 1990-2024. The search results obtained 197
documents. The researcher then conducted the
document screening and eligibility step: determining
and applying inclusion or exclusion criteria (see Table 1)
based on the title, topic, abstract and document content.
Based on the screening and eligibility results, 119
documents were eliminated because they were not
relevant to mathematical modelling and elementary
school (Figure 1).
In bibliometric research, the analysis should begin by
applying data preprocessing which includes activity
steps (Öztürk et al., 2024) such as
(1) identifying bibliometric analysis techniques
appropriate to the purpose and scope of the
research,
(2) determining appropriate software for analysis
and visualization, and
(3) analyzing data and visualizing research findings.
The analysis procedure in bibliometric research
(Donthu et al., 2021; Öztürk et al., 2024) is presented in
Figure 2.
Table 1. Eligibility criteria for inclusion and exclusion review
Category
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Language
Documents published in English
Exclude published documents that are not in English
Research fields on
Scopus
Research fields include education/research,
mathematics, social sciences, and science
Research fields other than education/research,
mathematics, social sciences, and science
Type of document
Articles, proceedings, and books
In addition to review articles.
Research subject
focus
The review of studies focuses only on
mathematics education at the basic
education or elementary school level
Reviewing studies at the high school to university
level
Database
Documents must be indexed in the Scopus
database.
Documents that are not indexed in the Scopus
database
Figure 1. Flowchart of PRISMA procedure in filtering
articles for bibliometric analysis (Source: Authors own
elaboration)
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
4 / 12
RESULTS
RQ1. What Is the Total Volume and Growth Trend of
Publications in the Mathematical Modelling in
Elementary School Literature in the Scopus Database
From 1990 to 2024?
To answer the first RQ, 78 documents on the Scopus
database were analyzed, consisting of 63 articles
(80.77%), and 15 conferences (19.23%). The development
trend of mathematical modelling publications in
elementary school from 1990 to 2024 can be seen in
Figure 3. In 1990-2000 mathematical modelling research
in elementary school still did not get much attention as
seen in the graph only produced 3 publications. Then the
trend of research development experienced a significant
increase in 2015-2023 with a total of 53 publications with
a percentage of 67.95% of the total 78 documents.
Although this trend actually decreased in 2021, it was
not too significant. If we look at the graph, in 2024 the
trend of research development on mathematical
modelling in elementary schools will increase, as
evidenced by the beginning of 2024 alone research
publications have issued 6 publications.
RQ2. Which Researchers and Research Groups Have
the Most Influence on the Mathematical Modelling in
Elementary Schools Literature in the Scopus Database
1990-2024?
There have been many studies conducted by
researchers on the topic of mathematical modelling in
elementary schools. The researchers/authors come from
various countries in the world (Table 2). It can be seen
that of the 10 authors who have the most total citations
based on Scopus database articles are dominated by
authors from Germany. However, the combined total
citation of authors from Germany cannot pass the
citation of the authors ranked 1 and 2. The authors who
have the most total citation come from Denmark such as
Blum, W. (h-index 22) and Niss, M. (h-index 16) both
have a total citation of 1,383. In addition, some well-
known authors with their research topics on
mathematical modelling that are not included in Table 2
are Krawitz, J. (2 documents), Greefrath, G. (2
documents), Stillman, G. (2 documents), and Leiss, D. (2
documents).
RQ3. Which Publication Sources Had the Most Impact
on the Mathematical Modelling in Elementary
Schools Literature in the Scopus Database 1990-2024?
Then, the authors identified the main publication
sources that have the most impact on the research topic
of mathematical modelling in elementary schools. It can
be seen in Table 3 that the 5 sources that have the highest
publication documents are International Journal of
Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (SJR
2024 = 0.63), Journal of Physics: Conference Series (SJR
2024 = 0.18), and ZDM-Mathematics Education (SJR 2024
= 1.1). Then, the 3 highest sources by total citations are
Educational studies in mathematics (SJR 2024 = 1.48),
ZDM-Mathematics Education (SJR 2024 = 1.1), Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences Development (SJR 2024 =
0).
Figure 2. The analysis procedure in bibliometric research
(Adapted from Donthu et al., 2021; Öztürk et al., 2024)
Figure 3. Annual scientific production related to mathematical modelling research in elementary school between 1990 to
2024 (Source: Authors’ own elaboration)
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2025, 21(2), em2577
5 / 12
RQ4. What Are the Popular Research Topic Trends in
Mathematical Modelling in Elementary School
Literature in the Scopus Database 1990-2024?
Based on all 78 documents in the Scopus database
that have been analyzed, 486 keywords appear.
However, in seeing the relationship between keywords,
researchers determined the minimum number of times a
keyword appears, which is twice. Based on these criteria,
75 keywords were obtained that fell within the
threshold. The results of the co-occurrence analysis from
VOSviewer can be seen in Figure 4. The most popular
keywords in this research topic are mathematical
modelling (77 times), elementary school (36 times),
student (17 times), problem (12 times), and teacher (10
times).
The relationship between keywords is based on the
size of the circle and the thickness of the path line, which
means that the keywords have a strong relationship and
often appear together with other keywords. Specifically,
when highlighting the keywords mathematical
modelling and elementary school, it is seen to have a
relationship and co-occurrence with other keywords
such as mathematical modelling task (13 times),
mathematical modelling activity (13 times),
approach/mathematical modelling approach (12 times),
modelling problem (8 times), competency (7 times),
mathematical application (5 times), real world
knowledge (4 times), and creative thinking (2 times).
Furthermore, based on the analysis results shown in
Figure 4. obtained information that the most trending
keywords currently related to the topic of mathematical
modelling research in elementary schools in Scopus
database articles from 1990 to 2024 are based on green
and yellow nodes such as mathematical modelling cycle,
development, mathematical modelling competency,
mathematical concept, mathematical knowledge,
modelling process, mathematical modelling task,
empirical study, and creative thinking. These trending
keywords can be considered as one of the alternative
variables that can be researched related to the research
topic of mathematical modelling which specifically the
research subjects are elementary school students.
DISCUSSION
Mathematical modelling is a learning approach that
integrates real-life or contextual problems into the
learning process of mathematical materials and
concepts. The difference between mathematical
modelling and other approaches lies in the criteria that
the context used must be realistic, authentic, and open-
ended. Based on the researchers review of several
literature studies, it is concluded that this research is the
first bibliometric research on the topic of mathematical
modelling in elementary schools. This study analyzed 78
documents on the Scopus database covering the years
1990 to 2024 on the topic of mathematical modelling in
elementary schools. The results have answered 4
Table 2. Top-10 authors by citation of research publications on mathematical modelling in elementary schools between
1990 and 2024
Rank
Affiliation
D
h-index
TC
PYS
1
Kassel University, Denmark
1
22
1,383
1991
2
Kassel University, Denmark
1
16
1,383
1991
3
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
2
31
368
2003
4
University of Leuven, Belgium
1
51
299
1997
5
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
1
20
252
2005
6
University of Münster, Germany
5
20
171
2011
7
University of Hamburg, Germany
2
35
141
2022
8
Cumhuriyet University, Turkey
1
-
118
2015
9
University of Hamburg, Germany
1
8
118
2022
10
University of Nevada, USA
3
6
84
2016
Note. D: Documents; TC: Total citations; & PYS: Publication year start
Table 3. Top-7 sources by number of research publications on mathematical modelling in elementary schools and their
citations between 1990 and 2024
Rank
Source
Source type
D
SJR 2024
h-index
TC
PYS
1
International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science and Technology
Journal
5
0.63
42
27
2019
2
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Conference & Proceeding
5
0.18
99
30
2017
3
ZDM-Mathematics Education
Journal
4
1.10
66
130
2018
4
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Journal
3
1.48
83
1,553
1991
5
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science
and Technology Education
Journal
3
0.45
56
2
2022
6
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
Journal
3
0.00
73
84
2009
7
Acta Scientiae
Journal
3
0.20
6
10
2017
Note. D: Documents; TC: Total citations; & PYS: Publication year start
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
6 / 12
questions in this study. Which provides an
understanding of the topic of mathematical modelling in
elementary school topics such as development trends,
researchers who have the most influence, publication
sources that have the most impact, trends in hot research
topics and guide the direction and consideration of
future mathematical modelling in elementary school
research variables.
In the results of this study obtained information that
the top 10 researchers who have the most influence are
dominated by authors from Germany and Denmark.
These two countries have become important centers in
research literature on the topic of mathematical
modelling. This is because mathematical modelling
developed through two projects known as KOM-project
in Denmark (KOM: Competence and mathematics
learning), whose report was published in 2002, has
played an important role in this development (Niss &
Højgaard, 2019). While in Germany there is the DISUM-
project. The starting point of the DISUM-project dates
back to 2002 (Blum & Schukajlow, 2018), which was a
joint project between mathematics education at the
University of Kassel, and educational psychology at the
University of Munich (Blum & Leiß, 2007). So it is not
surprising that mathematical modelling is highly
developed as a research topic by researchers, especially
in Germany and Denmark. In addition, the development
of mathematical modelling is increasingly accepted at
the international level is also supported by the existence
of the international community of teachers of
mathematical modelling (ICTMA). An international
community that focuses on research on teaching and
learning mathematical modelling at all levels of
education from early childhood to higher education
(Stillman et al., 2020b).
In addition, the current trend of mathematical
modelling research topics in elementary schools has
become very diverse. These research topics mostly focus
on development and design research methods in
developing mathematical modelling tasks. Then the
current trend of research topics focuses on the purpose
of supporting learning activities such as improving
mathematical modelling competency, mathematical
concept, mathematical knowledge, modelling process,
and creative thinking. It is also important to consider
data from the World Economic Forum which states that
the top three skills in the list of 10 human skills that will
become more important in the future are complex
problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity (Haara,
2022), which can be enhanced by using a mathematical
modeling approach.
Several studies have been conducted on the research
topic of mathematical modelling in elementary schools
including combining mathematical modelling as a
learning environment with the use of virtual
manipulatives to help first grade elementary school
students to overcome the difficulties detected in their
learning related to basic arithmetic operations (Silva et
al., 2021), modelling tasks on basic arithmetic operations
assisted by artificial intelligence tools (Spreitzer et al.,
2024), creating a mathematical modelling lesson based
on ethnomathematics in improving creative thinking of
Figure 4. Co-occurrence of keywords on the topic of mathematical modelling research in elementary school between 1990
and 2024 (number of keyword occurrences: at least 2 times, 75 keywords were obtained) (Source: Authors’ own elaboration)
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2025, 21(2), em2577
7 / 12
elementary school students (Supriadi et al., 2023),
designing mathematical modelling tasks that provide
experience in a financial context (Tural-Sonmez & Erbas,
2023), providing mathematical modelling problems to
train grade 6 students in building conceptual models
and understanding fractions (Shahbari & Peled, 2015).
Integrating mathematical modelling approaches is
important to start in elementary school (Stohlmann &
Albarracín, 2016). Mathematical modelling is important
in domains such as mathematical literacy (Wickstrom &
Yates, 2021). The literature shows that competence in
mathematical modelling is similar to the competence
needed to improve mathematical literacy (e.g.,
Breakspeari, 2012; Niss, 2015; OECD, 2017, 2018; Steen et
al., 2007). The PISA framework focuses on the process of
mathematization, the active model building that the
KOM-project framework is based on (Berget, 2023). The
PISA framework is known as the mathematical
modelling cycle (Cai et al., 2016; Stacey, 2015).
Attention continues to be paid to the relationship
between the development of mathematical literacy and
ones ability to develop and use mathematical modeling
to deal with real-world problems using mathematics
(Blum, 2002; Haara, 2022). Because the demands of using
mathematics to solve real-life problems intersect with
what mathematical modeling aims to achieve (Bliss &
Libertini, 2019; Mudaly & Dowlath, 2016). For decades,
mathematics education leaders have advocated that
modeling should be part of the teaching and learning
process because of the importance of mathematics in real
life (Arseven, 2015; Bonyah & Clark, 2022). So it is
important that the education curriculum takes this into
account, which can support and prepare learners to live
and work in the society of the future (Haara, 2022).
Mathematical modelling is key in developing
mathematical literacy skills, as applying mathematics to
real-life situations is a core competency of mathematical
literacy (Bali et al., 2020; Cevikbas et al., 2022). In
addition, integrating mathematical modelling in
teaching activities provides experience for students to
become independent modelers (Fajri et al., 2022), trains
students to use mathematics creatively (Geiger et al.,
2018), think critically and develop solutions to world
problems (Kaiser, 2017), and motivates students to learn
mathematics, appreciate the usefulness and importance
of learning mathematics (Stillman, 2019).
CONCLUSION
This literature study analyzes, presents and describes
the development of literature on the topic of
mathematical modelling in elementary schools over the
past three decades. Mathematical modelling is a learning
approach that has an important contribution to make in
mathematics. Mathematical modelling has gained
attention at the international level for its inclusion in
mathematics education curricula and also as a promising
research topic. The results of this study show that the
development trend of mathematical modelling research
has been growing significantly increasing every year,
especially starting in 2015.
In this research topic, researchers from Germany and
Denmark dominate the top 10 researchers who have the
most influence in terms of citations. However, we cannot
exclude researchers from the United States, Australia,
China, and Singapore who also play a role in publishing
literature on mathematical modelling. Especially the
research countries that are members of the ICTMA
which publishes the development and findings of
mathematical modelling in the process of learning
mathematics in schools from various countries around
the world.
The results of this study have implications for future
researchers, teachers, and education policy makers.
Based on the four RQs, namely
(1) the findings regarding the total volume and trend
of publication development provide an overview
of how mathematical modeling research has
developed over time and can be information for
anyone in learning about mathematical modeling
research from the initial year of publication to the
present;
(2) the findings regarding which researchers have the
most influence help teachers and new researchers
in finding references of authors to follow. For
policy makers, they can find the right researchers
to consult in policy making;
(3) the findings on the source of publications that
have the most impact can be a reference source in
finding mathematical modeling literature or
journal references for research publications on
mathematical modeling; and
(4) findings on research topic trends in the form of
popular keywords in mathematical modeling
research are useful for other researchers in
identifying research topics that they can do in the
future.
The limitation in this study is that it only examines
the mathematical modelling literature carried out at the
elementary school level. It is hoped that future research
can focus on the mathematical modelling literature
carried out on subjects at the secondary school to
university level. In addition, the limitations of this study
only investigate the literature in the range of 1990 to
2024. So the researcher excluded the literature in 1960
which was the period of the mathematical modelling
campaign to be included in the curriculum and in 1980-
1990 which was the initial year mathematical modelling
was integrated into the curriculum of various countries
in the world.
Author contributions: HMF, AM, and S: conceptualization,
methodology, analysis, and investigation of the study; HMF: data
collection from the Scopus database, selecting the software for data
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
8 / 12
analysis, conducting the analysis of bibliometric review results,
visualization, and drafting the manuscript; AM and S:
supervision, critical review, and editing. All authors approved the
final version of the manuscript and agreed with its results and
conclusions.
Funding: No funding source is reported for this study.
Ethical statement: The authors stated that this study does not
require ethics committee approval because the study does not
involve human or animal subjects. The study is a review of
literature already available in the Scopus database.
Declaration of interest: No conflict of interest is declared by the
authors.
Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and
conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding
author.
REFERENCES
Alwast, A., & Vorholter, K. (2022). Measuring pre-
service teachers’ noticing competencies within a
mathematical modeling context-an analysis of an
instrument. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109,
263-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-
10102-8
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool
for comprehensive science mapping analysis.
Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2022). Science mapping
analysis with bibliometrix R-package: An example.
Bibliometrix. https://bibliometrix.org/documents/
bibliometrix_Report.html
Arseven, A. (2015). Mathematical modelling approach in
mathematics education. Universal Journal of
Educational Research, 3(12), 973-980.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031204
Bali, M., Julie, C., & Mbekwa, M. (2020). Occurrences of
mathematical modelling competencies in the
nationally set examination for mathematical
literacy in South Africa. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser,
& C. E. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling
education and sense-making (pp. 361-370). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_31
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Pereira, V., Islam, N., Giudice,
M. D., & Choudrie, J. (2022). Gamification and e-
learning for young learners: A systematic literature
review, bibliometric analysis, and future research
agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
176, Article 121445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
techfore.2021.121445
Berget, I. K. (2023). Mathematical modelling in the
discourses of the KOM and PISA frameworks and
teacher interviews. Research in Mathematics
Education, 26(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/
14794802.2023.2165536
Bliss, K., & Libertini, J. (2019). GAIMME: Guidelines for
assessment & instruction in mathematical modeling
education (2nd ed.). Consortium for Mathematics
and Its Applications COMAP, Inc. & Society for
Industrial and Applied Mathematics SIAM.
https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975741
Block, J. H., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions
for your bibliographic study in business and
management research. Management Review
Quarterly, 70, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11301-020-00188-4
Blomhøj, M. (2019). Towards integration of modelling in
secondary mathematics teaching. In G. A. Stillman,
& J. P. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical
modelling research in education (pp. 37-52). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14931-4_3
Blum, W. (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and
modelling in mathematics educationDiscussion
document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1-
2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022435827
400
Blum, W. (2010). Werner Blum. Modellierungsaufgaben
im Mathematikunterricht [Werner Blum. Modeling
tasks in mathematics lessons]. Herausforderung für
Schüler und Lehrer, 52, 42-48.
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). Investigating quality
mathematics teaching: The DISUM project. In
Developing and researching quality in mathematics
teaching and learning (vol. 5, pp. 3-16).
Blum, W., & Schukajlow, S. (2018). Selbständiges Lernen
mit ModellierungsaufgabenUntersuchung von
Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren im Projekt
DISUM [Independent learning with modeling
tasksInvestigation of learning environments for
modeling in the DISUM project]. In S. Schukajlow,
& W. Blum (Eds.), Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum
Modellieren (pp. 51-72). Springer. https://doi.org/
10.1007/978-3-658-20325-2_4
Bonyah, E., & Clark, L. J. (2022). Pre-service teachers
perceptions of and knowledge for mathematical
modelling in Ghana. Contemporary Mathematics and
Science Education, 3(1), Article ep22011.
https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11932
Breakspeari, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An
exploration of the normative effects of international
benchmarking in school system performance. OECD
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-
en
Cai, J., Mok, I. A., Reddy, V., & Stacey, K. (2016).
International comparative studies in mathematics:
Lessons for improving students learning. In J. Cai,
I. A. Mok, V. Reddy, & K. Stacey (Eds.), International
comparative studies in mathematics (pp. 1-36).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
42414-9_1
Caron, F. (2019). Approaches to investigating complex
dynamical systems. In G. A. Stillman, & J. P. Brown
(Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical modelling
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2025, 21(2), em2577
9 / 12
research in education (pp. 83-103). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14931-4_5
Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). A
systematic literature review of the current
discussion on mathematical modelling
competencies: State-of-the-art developments in
conceptualizing, measuring, and fostering.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109, 205-236.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10104-6
Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Trends
in mathematics education and insights from a
meta-review and bibliometric analysis of review
studies. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56, 165-188.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01587-7
Chan, C. M., Ng, K. E., Lee, N. H., & Dindyal, J. (2019).
Problems in real-world context and mathematical
modelling. In T. L. Toh, B. Kaur, & E. G. Tay (Eds.),
Mathematics education in Singapore (pp. 195-216).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-
3573-0_9
Díaz-García, V., Montero-Navarro, A., Rodríguez-
Sánchez, J.-L., & Gallego-Losada, R. (2022).
Digitalization and digital transformation in higher
education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in
Psychology, 13, Article 1081595. https://doi.org/
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081595
Dindyal, J., & Kaur, B. (2010). Mathematical applications
and modelling: Concluding comments. In J.
Dindyal, & B. Kaur (Eds.), Mathematical applications
and modelling: Yearbook 2010 (pp. 325-335). World
Scientific.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814313353_0017
Do, T.-T., Tinh, P. T., Tran-Thi, H.-G., Bu, D. M., Pham,
T. O., Nguyen-Le, V.-A., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2021).
Research on lifelong learning in Southeast Asia: A
bibliometrics review between 1972 and 2019. Cogent
Education, 8(1), Article 1994361. https://doi.org/
10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994361
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., &
Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric
analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of
Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Drijvers, P., Grauwin, S., & Trouche, L. (2020). When
bibliometrics met mathematics education research:
The case of instrumental orchestration. ZDM-
Mathematics Education, 52, 1455-1469.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01169-3
Fajri, H. M., Hartono, Y., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2022).
Pengembangan LKPD pemodelan matematika
siswa SMP pada materi aritmatika [Development
of LKPD for junior high school students
mathematical modeling on arithmetic material].
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan
Matematika, 11(4), 3646-3661. https://doi.org/10.
24127/ajpm.v11i4.6248
Geiger, V., Galbraith, P., Niss, M., & Delzoppo, C. (2022).
Developing a task design and implementation
framework for fostering mathematical modelling
competencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
109, 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-
10039-y
Geiger, V., Stillman, G., Brown, P. J., Galbraith, P., &
Niss, M. (2018). Using mathematics to solve real
world problems: The role of enablers. Mathematics
Education Research Journal, 30(1), 7-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0217-3
Geng, Y., Chen, W., Liu, Z., Chiu, A. S., Han, W., Liu, Z.,
Zhong, S., Qian, Y., You, W., & Cui, X. (2017). A
bibliometric review: Energy consumption and
greenhouse gas emissions in the residential sector.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 301-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.091
Gokce, S., & Guner, P. (2021). Forty years of mathematics
education: 1980-2019. International Journal of
Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology,
9(3), 514-539. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.
1361
Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J.
A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some
bibliometric procedures for analyzing and
evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48,
1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-
1105-y
Ha, C. T., Thao, T. T., Trung, N. T., Huong, L. T., Dinh,
N. V., & Trung, T. (2020). A bibliometric review of
research on STEM education in ASEAN: Science
mapping the literature in Scopus database, 2000 to
2019. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 16(10), em1889.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8500
Haara, F. O. (2022). Mathematical modelling in upper
primary school: Finding relevance and value for
others outside school. European Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 10(4), 555-569.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12403
Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A
bibliometric review of research on higher education
for sustainable development, 1998-2018.
Sustainability, 11(8), Article 2401. https://doi.org/
10.3390/su11082401
Hartmann, L.-M., Krawitz, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2023).
Posing and solving modelling problems-extending
the modelling process from a problem posing
perspective. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 44,
533-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-023-
00223-3
Jankvist, U. T., & Niss, M. (2020). Upper secondary
school students difficulties with mathematical
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
10 / 12
modelling. International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 467-496.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1587530
Jantakun, K., Jantakoon, T., & Laoha, R. (2024). STEAM
learning environment on gamification system to
promote innovators: A bibliometric analysis and
systematic review. International Education Studies,
17(3), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n3p62
Julius, R., Halim, M. S., Hadi, N. A., Alias, A. N., Khalid,
M. H., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021).
Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics
education using Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,
17(12), em2040. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/
11329
Kaiser, G. (2017). The teaching and learning of
mathematical modeling. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium
for research in mathematics education (pp. 267-291).
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kaiser, G. (2020). Mathematical modelling and
applications in education. In S. Lerman (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 553-561).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
15789-0_101
Kaiser, G., Lederich, C., & Rau, V. (2010). Theoretical
approaches and examples for modelling in
mathematics education. In J. Dindyal, & B. Kaur
(Eds.), Mathematical applications and modelling:
Yearbook 2010 (pp. 219-246). World Scientific.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814313353_0012
Karampelas, K. (2023). Examining the relationship
between TPACK and STEAM through a
bibliometric study. European Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 11(3), 488-498.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12981
Kartika, H., Budiarto, M. T., Fuad, Y., & Bonyah, E.
(2023). Bibliometrics analysis of research on
argumentation in mathematics education.
International Journal of Education in Mathematics,
Science, and Technology, 11(5), 1346-1365.
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2904
Kondrashev, S. V., Sokolova, N. L., Zaripova, Z. F.,
Khairullina, E. R., Omarova, L. B., Zamaraeva, E. I.,
& Dobrokhotov, D. A. (2024). Innovations in
science education: A bibliometric exploration of
trends and future directions. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6),
em2453. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14591
Krawitz, J., Chang, Y.-P., Yang, K.-L., & Schukajlow, S.
(2022). The role of reading comprehension in
mathematical modelling: Improving the
construction of a real-world model and interest in
Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 109, 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1007
/s10649-021-10058-9
Ledezma, C., Breda, A., & Font, V. (2024). Prospective
teachers reflections on the inclusion of
mathematical modelling during the transition
period between the face-to-face and virtual
teaching contexts. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 22, Article 10571081.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10412-8
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and
modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of
research on mathematics teaching and learning.
Information Age Publishing.
Lin, X., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Chen, X., & Xu, B. (2024).
Advances in the innovation of management: A
bibliometric review. Review of Managerial Science,
18, 1557-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-
00667-4
Lozada, E., Guerrero-Ortiz, C., Coronel, A., & Medina, R.
(2021). Classroom methodologies for teaching and
learning ordinary differential equations: A
systemic literature review and bibliometric
analysis. Mathematics, 9(7), Article 745.
https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070745
Maaß, K. (2007). What do we want the students to learn?
In C. G. Haines (Ed.), Mathematical modelling in class.
Horwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/
9780857099419.2.63
Marín-Marín, J.-A., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Dúo-Terrón,
P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in
education: A bibliometric analysis of performance
and co-words in Web of Science. International
Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 41.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
Mervar, A., & Jokić, M. (2022). Core-periphery nexus in
the EU social sciences: Bibliometric perspective.
Scientometrics, 127, 5793-5817. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s11192-022-04493-5
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., &
Group, T. P. (2010). Preferred reporting items for
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The
PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery,
8(5), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.
02.007
Mudaly, V., & Dowlath, E. (2016). Pre-service teachers
use of mathematical modelling. Ponte Academic
Journal, 72(8), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.
ponte.2016.8.5
Nasir, A., Shaukat, K., Hameed, I. A., Luo, S., Mahboob,
T., & Iqbal, F. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of
corona pandemic in social sciences: A review of
influential aspects and conceptual structure. IEEE
Access, 8, 133377-133402. https://doi.org/10.1109/
ACCESS.2020.3008733
Niss, M. (2015). Mathematical competencies and PISA.
In K. Stacey, & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing
mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 35-55).
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2025, 21(2), em2577
11 / 12
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
10121-7_2
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical
competencies revisited. Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 102, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10649-019-09903-9
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction.
In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith,, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss
(Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics
education (pp. 3-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.
1007/978-0-387-29822-1_1
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical
framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial
literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD
Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
OECD. (2018). PISA for development assessment and
analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and
science. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787
/9789264305274-en
Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanback, D. K. (2024). How
to design bibliometric research: An overview and a
framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science,
18, 3333-3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-
024-00738-0
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I.,
Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L.,
Tetzlaff, J. M. Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R.,
Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A.,
Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E.,
McDonald, S., . . ., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA
2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting
systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pham, H. T., Vu, T. C., Nguyen, L. T., Vu, N.-T. T.,
Nguyen, T. C., Pham, H.-H. T., Lai, L. P., Le, H.-C.
T., & Ngo, C. H. (2023). Professional development
for science teachers: A bibliometric analysis from
2001 to 2021. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science
and Technology Education, 19(5), Article em2260.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13153
Pham-Duc, B., Tran, T., Le, H.-T.-T., Nguyen, N.-T., Cao,
H.-T., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2021). Research on industry
4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A
bibliometric analysis using Scopus. Learned
Publishing, 34(3), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.1002
/leap.1381
Pollak, H. (2007). Mathematical modellingA
conversation with Henry Pollak. In W. Blum, P. L.
Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling
and applications in mathematics education (pp. 109-
120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-
29822-1_9
Prieto-Jiménez, E., López-Catalán, L., López-Catalán, B.,
& Domínguez-Fernández, G. (2021). Sustainable
development goals and education: A bibliometric
mapping analysis. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 2126.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042126
Schryen, G., & Sperling, M. (2023). Literature reviews in
operations research: A new taxonomy and a meta
review. Computers & Operations Research, 157,
Article 106269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.
106269
Schukajlow, S., Krawitz, J., Kanefke, J., Blum, W., &
Rakoczy, K. (2023). Open modelling problems:
Cognitive barriers and instructional prompts.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114, 417-438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10265-6
Shahbari, J. A., & Peled, I. (2017). Modelling in primary
school: Constructing conceptual models and
making sense of fractions. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 371-391.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9702-x
Shen, C.-W., & Ho, J.-T. (2020). Technology-enhanced
learning in higher education: A bibliometric
analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers
in Human Behavior, 104, Article 106177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177
Silva, R., Costa, C., & Martins, F. (2021). Using
mathematical modelling and virtual manipulatives
to teach elementary mathematics. In A. Reis, J.
Barroso, J. B. Lopes, T. Mikropoulos, & C.-W. Fan
(Eds.), Technology and innovation in learning, teaching
and education (pp. 75-89). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_6
Sobral, S. R. (2020). Mobile learning in higher education:
A bibliometric review. International Journal of
Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(11), 153-170.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13973
Song, Y., Chen, X., Hao, T., Liu, Z., & Lan, Z. (2019).
Exploring two decades of research on classroom
dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Computers
& Education, 137, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
compedu.2019.04.002
Spooner, K. (2024). What does mathematical modelling
have to offer mathematics education? Insights from
students perspectives on mathematical modelling.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in
Science and Technology, 55(3), 615-627.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.2009052
Spreitzer, C., Straser, O., Zehetmeier, S., & Maaß, K.
(2024). Mathematical modelling abilities of artificial
intelligence tools: The case of ChatGPT. Education
Sciences, 14(7), Article 698. https://doi.org/10.3390
/educsci14070698
Stacey, K. (2015). The real world and the mathematical
world. In K. Stacey, & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing
mathematical literacy (pp. 57-84). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_3
Fajri et al. / A bibliometric study on mathematical modelling in elementary schools in the Scopus database
12 / 12
Steen, L. A., Turner, R., & Burkhardt, H. (2007).
Developing mathematical literacy. In W. Blum, P.
L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.),
Modelling and applications in mathematics education:
The 14th ICMI study (pp. 285-294). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_30
Stillman, G. A. (2019). State of the art on modelling in
mathematics educationLines of inquiry. In G. A.
Stillman, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in
mathematical modelling research in education (pp. 1-
20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
14931-4_1
Stillman, G. A., & Brown, J. P. (2019). Lines of inquiry in
mathematical modelling research in education.
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
14931-4
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Lampen, C. E. (2020a).
Mathematical modelling education and sense-making.
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
37673-4
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Lampen, C. E. (2020b).
Sense-making in mathematical modelling and
applications educational research and practice. In
G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. E. Lampen (Eds.),
Mathematical modelling education and sense-making
(pp. 15-29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/
978-3-030-37673-4_2
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., Blum, W., & Brown, J. P.
(2013). Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting
to research and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/
10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5
Stohlmann, M. S., & Albarracín, L. (2016). What is known
about elementary grades mathematical modelling.
Education Research International. https://doi.org/
10.1155/2016/5240683
Supriadi, Alfarisa, F., Hanif, M., & Belinda, B. (2023).
Elementary school students: Analysis of
questionnaire in creative thinking and
mathematical modelling in ethnomathematics
learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2621(1), Article
020008. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142463
Tran, D., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen,, A. T., Nguyen, G.-N.
T., & Ta, P. M. (2020). Bridging to mathematical
modelling: Vietnamese students response to
different levels of authenticity in contextualized
tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education
in Science and Technology, 51(6), 893-912.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648890
Tural-Sonmez, M., & Erbas, A. K. (2023). Seventh-grade
students understanding of risk and reward arising
from mathematical modelling activities.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in
Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/
0020739X.2023.2258881
Verma, R., Lobos-Ossandón, V., Merigó, J. M., Cancino,
C., & Sienz, J. (2021). Forty years of applied
mathematical modelling: A bibliometric study.
Applied Mathematical Modelling, 89(2), 1177-1197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.004
Wickstrom, M. H., & Yates, A. (2021). Mathematical
modeling: Analyzing elementary students
perceptions of what it means to know and do
mathematics. In J. M. Suh, M. H. Wickstrom, & L.
D. English (Eds.), Exploring mathematical modeling
with young learners (pp. 209-233). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_10
Yamaguchi, N. U., Bernardino, E. G., Ferreira, M. E.,
Lima, B. P., Pascotini, M. R., & Yamaguchi, M. U.
(2023). Sustainable development goals: A
bibliometric analysis of literature reviews.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30,
5502-5515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-
24379-6
Yig, K. G. (2022). Research trends in mathematics
education: A quantitative content analysis of major
journals 2017-2021. Journal of Pedagogical Research,
6(3), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.
202215529
https://www.ejmste.com
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This work explores the mathematical modelling capabilities of various iterations of ChatGPT, focusing on their performance across tasks of differing complexity and openness. The study examines the abilities of GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, and a more instructed version, GPT-MM, in multiple scenarios. It is observed that all versions demonstrate basic mathematical problem-solving skills. However, their effectiveness varies with increasing task complexity. While GPT-4.0 and GPT-MM show marginal improvements in providing detailed solutions, significant challenges persist, especially in moderate to complex modelling contexts where comprehending the nuances of tasks becomes challenging. Additionally, the study suggests that the openness of modelling tasks has a limited impact on performance, highlighting that mathematical and contextual complexities play more critical roles. The implications of these observations are discussed in terms of potential enhancements to teaching methodologies and the integration of AI tools like GPT in educational settings. This reiterates the importance of further research to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of AI tools and ensure their effective use in education.
Article
Full-text available
The STEAM learning environment with a gamification system has been found to promote innovators by enhancing creative thinking and innovation skills in students. It can engage and motivate students, making the course content come alive. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the research conducted in the field of STEAM education with a focus on gamification, specifically examining studies published within the last six years. A bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews were performed to examine the trends in published literature on steam learning environment on gamification systems to promote innovators between the years 2018 and 2023. The retrieval of pertinent documents was conducted by employing keywords associated with “TITLE-ABS-KEY (“steam” AND “gamification” AND “innovation” AND “skill” AND “innovator” AND “learning environment” AND “ecosystem”)” in the title, abstract, and keywords of the documents. Consequently, a total of 5 documents were obtained from the Scopus database for the purpose of conducting bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The review examines the pattern of publication growth, identifies the papers with the highest citation counts, determines the primary sources of these articles, assesses the productivity of writers, analyzes the leading countries contributing to the field, and identifies the prominent subject areas within the research domain. Based on the results of our investigation, it can be concluded that Thailand exhibits the highest level of productivity in terms of publications and citations. Education and Information Technologies is widely recognized as the primary scholarly resource in its field. Through the co-occurrence of keywords analysis, we determined that the most significant keywords associated with steam learning environment on gamification systems to promote innovators are gamification, creative thinking, steam education, design thinking and digital learning ecosystem and so on. The computer science and social science domains have the highest number of published documents.
Article
Full-text available
Review studies are vital for advancing knowledge in many scientific fields, including mathematics education, amid burgeoning publications. Based on an extensive consideration of existing review typologies, we conducted a meta-review and bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of and deeper insights into review studies within mathematics education. After searching Web of Science, we identified 259 review studies, revealing a significant increase in such studies over the last five years. Systematic reviews were the most prevalent type, followed by meta-analyses, generic literature reviews, and scoping reviews. On average, the review studies had a sample size of 99, with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines commonly employed. Despite certain studies offering nuanced distinctions among review types, ambiguity persisted. Only about a quarter of the studies explicitly reported employing specific theoretical frameworks (particularly, technology, knowledge, and competence models). Co-authored publications were most common within American institutions and the leading countries are the United States, Germany, China, Australia, and England in publishing most review studies. Educational review journals, educational psychology journals, special education journals, educational technology journals, and mathematics education journals provided platforms for review studies, and prominent research topics included digital technologies, teacher education, mathematics achievement, and learning disabilities. In this study, we synthesised a range of reviews to facilitate readers’ comprehension of conceptual congruities and disparities across various review types, as well as to track current research trends. The results suggest that there is a need for discipline-specific standards and guidelines for different types of mathematics education reviews, which may lead to more high-quality review studies to enhance progress in mathematics education.
Article
Full-text available
Bibliometric analysis has recently become a popular and rigorous technique used for exploring and analyzing the literature in business and management. Prior studies principally focused on ‘how to do bibliometric analysis’, presenting an overview of the bibliometric methodology along with various techniques and step-by-step guidelines that can be relied on to rigorously conduct bibliometric analysis. However, the current body of evidence is limited in its ability to provide practical knowledge that can enhance the design and performance of bibliometric research. This claim is supported even by the fact that relevant studies refer to their work as ‘bibliometric analysis’ rather than ‘bibliometric research’. Accordingly, we endeavor to offer a more functional framework for researchers who wish to design/conduct bibliometric research on any field of research, especially business and management. To do this, we followed a twofold way. We first outlined the main stages and steps of typical bibliometric research. Then, we proposed a comprehensive framework for specifying how to design/conduct the research and under what headings the relevant stages (step-by-step) will be used and/or presented. Thus, the current paper is expected to be a useful source to gain insights into the available techniques and guide researchers in designing/conducting bibliometric research.
Article
Full-text available
Open mathematical modelling problems that can be solved with multiple methods and have multiple possible results are an important part of school curricula in mathematics and science. Solving open modelling problems in school should prepare students to apply their mathematical knowledge in their current and future lives. One characteristic of these problems is that information that is essential for solving the problems is missing. In the present study, we aimed to analyze students’ cognitive barriers while they solved open modelling problems, and we evaluated the effects of instructional prompts on their success in solving such problems. A quantitative experimental study (N = 263) and a qualitative study (N = 4) with secondary school students indicated that identifying unknown quantities and making numerical assumptions about these quantities are important cognitive barriers to solving open modelling problems. Task-specific instructional prompts helped students overcome these barriers and improved their solution rates. Students who were given instructional prompts included numerical assumptions in their solutions more often than students who were not given such prompts. These findings contribute to theories about solving open modelling problems by uncovering cognitive barriers and describing students’ cognitive processes as they solve these problems. In addition, the findings contribute to improving teaching practice by indicating the potential and limitations of task-specific instructional prompts that can be used to support students’ solution processes in the classroom.
Article
Full-text available
This study is based on the bibliometrics analysis of research publications that focus on highlighting the argumentation on mathematics education. The main objective of this study is to analyze the distribution of research results, the main journals for publication, and the most productive authors, the pattern of authorship and the pattern of citation. Data was collected from Scopus database and was analyzed using VOSviewer software. A total of 173 articles published from 1995 to December 2021 were retrieved and perused. Graphs, tables, charts, and maps have been used to analyze and present collected data. The analysis results show that argumentation in mathematics education has been studied frequently with the concepts of proof, reasoning, teacher education, and geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior and Educational Studies in Mathematics have been the top journals, and the University of Rutgers has been the most influential institution, and the United States has had a significant prevalence in this field. The results of this study provide insights for researchers interested in mathematics education in this field, suggesting that they can explore various alternatives to the major research trends and the influential articles mentioned. Based on the results, recommendations for future studies are provided.
Article
Full-text available
Research in Mathematics Education highlights the importance of including modelling for the teaching of this subject. In 2020, this trend coexisted with a grave contingency situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic but which, despite its negative aspects, provided a realistic and authentic context for modelling. Given this situation, it is relevant to study which aspects of the teaching and learning process prospective teachers related to mathematical modelling in their reflections on its inclusion during the transition period between the face-to-face and virtual teaching contexts. To this end, we used the Didactic Suitability Criteria construct, proposed by the Onto-Semiotic Approach, as a theoretical reference. This is qualitative research of a naturalistic type, since we did not interfere in the Master's Programme in Mathematics Teacher Education studied. We conducted a content analysis on 122 Master's Degree Final Projects written during the 2019–2020 course and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the following results: (a) about 40% of the prospective teachers stated that they implemented modelling in their didactic units and reflected on its inclusion; (b) in their reflections, the prospective teachers positively assessed the inclusion of modelling mainly based on the epistemic, affective, and ecological suitability criteria; (c) 60% of the prospective teachers did not implement modelling, and we rule out that it was due to a lack of knowledge about this process or of a favourable context for modelling, but because they prioritised other aspects of the mathematical teaching and learning process, given the grave contingency situation.
Article
This article carries out a bibliometric research review to present the evolving landscape of innovations in science education. The study acknowledges the dynamism of the contemporary educational practices and uses the bibliometric analyses for identification of trends, assessment of impacts of scholarly outputs, and mapping the future directions in the field of science education innovation. Starting with a review of the standard bibliometric indicators, e.g., citation analysis and co-authorship, the review lays down the theoretical basis for the understanding of the scientific impact of the innovations in science education. The analysis, moreover, consists of identifying thematic foci and emerging topics through keyword mapping, which together present a holistic picture of the intellectual map of the field. The review points to seminal works and trends, demonstrating the nature of interdisciplinarity in research in science education innovation. By the analysis of collaborative networks and research hotspots the research not only demonstrates the present status of the field, but also predicts its future directions, which could help researchers and educators at the same time. Also, as a retrospective tool, the article explores the general relevance of bibliometric insights for educators, administrators, and other researchers. It highlights the application of bibliometrics in evidence-based decision-making, curricula design and international collaboration, because it is common knowledge that it can trigger the great revolution in innovative science education. This bibliometric review generates useful outcomes, which are beneficial to academic discussions and provide guidelines for future research efforts as a key reference for researchers who would like to have a deep, general overview of the innovations in science education.
This study examined seventh-grade students’ emergent and progressive financial literacy in the context of risk and reward while working on two mathematical modelling tasks. The participants were six seventh-grade students identified as ‘good at mathematics’ by their teachers. The data sources comprised videotaped group discussions, group presentations, worksheets, and researchers’ field notes. The results revealed that students’ financial experience and mathematical knowledge influenced the mathematical modelling process in the context of risk and reward. Students with experience in financial contexts, similar to those in the modelling tasks, were more successful in making financial comments and linking mathematical knowledge. We conclude that mathematical modelling tasks would have encouraged students to discuss and adopt different approaches that facilitated more advanced financial thinking. How mathematical modelling activities might activate students’ financial knowledge in the context of risk and reward was discussed, and limitations and recommendations for further research are included.