Strategic Integration of Generative AI in Organizational Settings: Applications, Challenges and Adoption Requirements

Abstract

Generative AI is revolutionizing the way organizations operate, offering transformative capabilities that span automated content creation, strategic decision-making, and customer engagement through AI-driven chatbots. This paper conducts a comprehensive literature review to explore the applications, challenges, and strategic requirements for adopting generative AI in organizational contexts, focusing on the distinct needs of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and large organizations. The findings reveal that generative AI can improve efficiency, drive innovation, and improve customer satisfaction, but its adoption pathways differ significantly between organizational sizes. For SMEs, the emphasis lies on cost-effective and scalable solutions that optimize resource-constrained operations. At the same time, large organizations leverage their extensive resources to scale AI applications, manage complex systems, and address ethical and regulatory challenges. The study highlights critical barriers, including data privacy concerns, integration with legacy systems, and resistance to change, alongside actionable recommendations for overcoming these challenges. By synthesizing insights from 38 high-quality studies, this research bridges the gap between theory and practice. It provides a roadmap for organizations of varying scales to harness generative AI as a cornerstone of their digital transformation journey. It also identifies key areas for future exploration, ensuring relevance in this rapidly evolving field.

Full text

1
Strategic Integration of Generative AI in
Organizational Settings: Applications, Challenges
and Adoption Requirements
Mousa Al-kfairy, Member, IEEE
Index Terms—Generative AI Integration; Digital Transforma-
tion; Strategic AI Adoption; AI-Enabled Operational Efficiency;
Literature Review; Strategic Planning
Abstract—Generative AI is revolutionizing the way organiza-
tions operate, offering transformative capabilities that span auto-
mated content creation, strategic decision-making, and customer
engagement through AI-driven chatbots. This paper conducts
a comprehensive literature review to explore the applications,
challenges, and strategic requirements for adopting generative AI
in organizational contexts, focusing on the distinct needs of Small
and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and large organizations. The
findings reveal that generative AI can improve efficiency, drive
innovation, and improve customer satisfaction, but its adoption
pathways differ significantly between organizational sizes. For
SMEs, the emphasis lies on cost-effective and scalable solutions
that optimize resource-constrained operations. At the same time,
large organizations leverage their extensive resources to scale
AI applications, manage complex systems, and address ethical
and regulatory challenges. The study highlights critical barriers,
including data privacy concerns, integration with legacy systems,
and resistance to change, alongside actionable recommendations
for overcoming these challenges. By synthesizing insights from
38 high-quality studies, this research bridges the gap between
theory and practice. It provides a roadmap for organizations of
varying scales to harness generative AI as a cornerstone of their
digital transformation journey. It also identifies key areas for
future exploration, ensuring relevance in this rapidly evolving
field.
I. INTRODUCTION
GEnerative AI is fundamentally transforming organiza-
tional landscapes by automating complex tasks, en-
hancing decision-making capabilities, and fostering innovation
across various business domains. This technological revolution
is boosting productivity and customer engagement and reshap-
ing the creative processes within industries. The deployment of
generative AI applications spans from content creation to fraud
detection, each presenting unique benefits and introducing new
operational dynamics [1]–[3].
However, the integration of generative AI into existing
business operations is accompanied by significant challenges.
These include the need for substantial modifications to legacy
IT infrastructure, data privacy and security concerns, and the
ethical implications associated with AI deployments, such as
bias in decision-making processes [4], [5]. Additionally, there
is an observable hesitance among employees regarding AI
adoption, often stemming from fears of job displacement and
the challenges of adapting to new technological paradigms [6].
Given the transformative impact and the complex challenges
associated with generative AI, this study aims to address
several critical research questions:
1) What are the most effective applications of generative
AI that can enhance organizational efficiency and foster
innovation across different sectors?
2) What are the primary challenges associated with inte-
grating generative AI into organizational settings, and
what strategies can be employed to mitigate these chal-
lenges?
3) What are the necessary conditions and requirements
for organizations to successfully adopt and integrate
generative AI technologies into their operations?
By exploring these questions, this study seeks to provide
a comprehensive overview of the strategic integration of
generative AI within various organizational settings. It aims
to identify both the opportunities and the systemic challenges
these technologies pose, offering insights into effective adop-
tion strategies that maximize benefits while minimizing risks
associated with generative AI [7]–[9].
To address the research questions outlined, we adopted a
systematic literature review methodology. This approach al-
lowed us to comprehensively identify generative AI’s principal
applications, challenges, and adoption requirements in organi-
zational settings. The following section details the methodol-
ogy used for the literature review. Subsequent sections explore
the key application areas of generative AI within organi-
zational contexts, delineate the major challenges associated
with its integration, and discuss the necessary conditions for
successful adoption.
The discussion extends into the theoretical implications of
our findings, shedding light on their relevance and applica-
tion in current business practices. We also consider practical
implications, offering insights that can guide organizations
in the strategic integration of generative AI technologies.
Furthermore, we outline directions for future research that
could further elucidate the evolving role of generative AI in
enhancing organizational capabilities and addressing emergent
challenges.
The final section provides a conclusion that encapsulates
the study’s contributions to the field of generative AI in
organizational settings, highlighting significant insights and
recommendations for ongoing and future implementations.
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

2
II. METHODOLOGY
A. Study Selection
The methodology for this literature review was designed
to ensure comprehensive coverage and rigorous analysis of
the literature on the integration of generative AI within orga-
nizational settings. The initial search strategy targeted several
databases, including IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and JSTOR,
and focused on finding peer-reviewed articles and proceedings
from the last decade, yielding 354 papers. The following stages
were employed to refine the pool and ensure relevance and
quality:
1) Duplicate Removal: The first step involved remov-
ing duplicates, which reduced the total to 323 papers.
This process was essential to streamline the subsequent
screening phases.
2) Initial Screening: Titles and abstracts were reviewed
to assess the relevance of each paper to the core themes
of generative AI’s organizational integration. Papers that
did not directly address the integration of generative AI
or were purely theoretical without empirical evidence
were excluded. This screening resulted in 103 papers
progressing to the next phase.
3) Abstract Review: A more detailed examination of the
abstracts of the remaining papers was conducted. The
focus was on identifying studies that discussed strategic
implementations, challenges, and outcomes of gener-
ative AI applications in organizational contexts. This
stage narrowed the selection to 49 papers deemed most
pertinent.
4) Full-Text Review: Full-text access was obtained for 38
of the 49 selected papers. The remaining were excluded
due to being irrelevant after reviewing the full article or
because of accessibility issues.
B. Data Extraction and Synthesis
For the 38 papers with full access, a structured data ex-
traction form was employed to capture information on study
characteristics such as geographical context, research design,
sample size, technologies explored, and main findings related
to the adoption and impact of generative AI.
The extracted data were synthesized using thematic analysis
to identify patterns, themes, and commonalities across the
studies. This approach facilitated an in-depth exploration of
how organizations are integrating generative AI and the variety
of outcomes reported in the literature.
C. Quality Assessment
Each selected paper underwent a rigorous quality assess-
ment based on carefully defined criteria to ensure the trans-
parency, reliability, and replicability of the review process.
First, we evaluated the clarity of research objectives, ensuring
that each study clearly articulated its aims, scope, and contri-
butions to the field of generative AI. This criterion was essen-
tial to verify whether the study addressed meaningful questions
relevant to organizational contexts. Second, the robustness of
methodology was assessed by examining the appropriateness
of the research design, including the data collection methods,
analysis techniques, and the use of relevant theoretical frame-
works. This step ensured that the findings were supported by
sound methodologies, enhancing their validity and rigor.
Next, we focused on the relevance of results, ensuring that
the outcomes directly addressed the research questions and
provided actionable or theoretical insights into the integration
and adoption of generative AI within organizations. Studies
that demonstrated clear connections between their findings
and the broader research goals were prioritized. Finally, we
examined the consistency of conclusions, ensuring that the
conclusions were logically derived from the results and suffi-
ciently supported by evidence. This criterion was particularly
important to confirm that the studies’ inferences were reliable
and meaningful.
By systematically applying these four quality assessment
criteria, we ensured that only high-quality studies were in-
cluded in our review. This process not only strengthens the
credibility and scholarly rigor of the findings but also provides
a strong foundation for drawing comprehensive conclusions
about the applications, challenges, and strategic requirements
for generative AI adoption in organizational settings. Further-
more, this transparent approach enhances the replicability of
the review, enabling future researchers to follow a similar
process to evaluate literature in related domains.
D. Systematic Analysis Results
The systematic review process was executed to evaluate
the integration of generative AI within organizational settings.
This section summarizes the outcomes of the literature screen-
ing process, the distribution of paper types, and the distribution
of research types.
The review began with an initial search across six databases,
yielding a total of 354 papers. After duplicate removal, this
count was reduced to 323 papers, demonstrating a significant
reduction in the volume of content due to overlapping studies
across databases. The screening process was conducted in
several phases, each narrowing the field significantly (see 1:
•Title Screening: The first round of screenings based
on titles resulted in 103 papers. This considerable drop
reflects the stringent criteria applied to ensure relevance
to the topic of generative AI in organizational settings.
•Abstract Screening: Further examination through ab-
stracts reduced the pool to 49 papers, highlighting the
focus on studies that provided substantial insights into
the use and impact of generative AI.
•Full Paper Screening: The final selection involved a
thorough review of full texts, which identified 38 papers
as meeting all the criteria for a detailed review, ensuring
that only the most pertinent studies were included in the
analysis.
This rigorous process ensured that the studies included in
the review were highly relevant and contributed meaningfully
to understanding generative AI applications in organizational
contexts.
As illustrated in 2, the review of 38 papers revealed a
balanced distribution between empirical and review studies.
Out of the final set of papers:
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

3
Fig. 1. Review Process Results
Fig. 2. Paper Type (Journal, conference...etc)
•Review Papers: 15 papers were identified as review
articles, providing comprehensive overviews of existing
research, methodologies, and theoretical advancements in
the field of generative AI.
•Empirical Papers: 23 papers were empirical studies that
offered insights based on data, experiments, or case stud-
ies. These papers significantly contribute to understanding
the practical implications and real-world applications of
generative AI in organizations.
Fig. 3. Research Type
This balance between review and empirical papers ensures
a well-rounded understanding of both the theoretical and
practical aspects of generative AI in organizational settings
(see 3).
The research types of the papers reviewed largely consisted
of journal articles, accounting for most publications. The
breakdown is as follows:
•Journal Papers: Predominantly, the studies were pub-
lished in peer-reviewed journals, indicating a high level
of academic rigor and peer validation.
•Conference Proceedings: A smaller proportion of the
studies were drawn from conference proceedings, which
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

4
Fig. 4. Distribution of reviewed papers by year
often present cutting-edge research and innovative ideas
in the field.
•Others: Few studies were categorized as preprints and
technical reports, providing early insights and extended
analyses of topics pertinent to generative AI.
This distribution highlights the academic acceptance and
interest in generative AI technologies, reflecting an active area
of research with substantial contributions from diverse schol-
arly sources. The results from this literature review elucidate
the depth and breadth of research on generative AI within
organizational settings. The careful selection process has led
to a collection of high-quality papers that collectively enhance
our understanding of how generative AI is reshaping business
processes and organizational strategies. This review maps the
current landscape and sets the stage for future research in this
dynamically evolving field.
III. GEN ER ATIV E AI APPLICATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONAL
SETTINGS
Generative AI is transforming organizational operations
across various sectors through its capacity to automate and
enhance numerous processes. This technology leverages algo-
rithms to generate new content, make predictions, and sim-
ulate human interactions, which can significantly streamline
operations and increase efficiency. Table 1 and the subsequent
sections provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse
applications of generative AI within organizational settings,
ranging from content creation and management to complex
decision support systems. Each category not only highlights
specific applications but also cites recent academic research
that explores these advancements. This segmentation illustrates
the broad impact of generative AI technologies and the ongo-
ing research supporting their development and integration into
different organizational processes.
A. Content Creation and Management
Generative AI significantly enhances content generation
capabilities across various sectors, transforming how orga-
nizations handle communications, marketing, and reporting.
This technology employs sophisticated algorithms capable of
Application Reference(s)
Content
Creation and
Management
[1], [10], [2], [11], [12]
Design and
Prototyping
[13], [14]
Customer Ser-
vice Enhance-
ment
[15], [5], [16], [8], [1]
Decision Sup-
port Systems
[7], [8], [15], [6], [17]
Fraud Detec-
tion
[3], [18], [19], [4], [8], [20]
Software De-
velopment
[14]
Human
Resources and
Recruitment
[21], [11], [22], [8]
producing text closely resembling human writing. Such capa-
bilities are pivotal for applications ranging from automating
routine communications to generating complex reports and
marketing materials [1], [2], [10], [23].
Drafting reports is critical and resource-intensive in cor-
porate environments. Generative AI streamlines this process
by automatically integrating data from diverse sources to
produce coherent and insightful reports. For example, financial
analysts can use AI to generate quarterly financial reports,
pull the latest data, interpret trends, and benchmark them
against industry standards [1]. This automation accelerates the
reporting process and minimizes human errors, ensuring high
precision and reliability in critical documents.
Marketing is another area where generative AI’s creativity
is incredibly beneficial. AI systems can produce various mar-
keting materials—from social media posts and blog articles to
entire advertising campaigns. By analyzing successful content
and current trends, these tools can suggest themes, draft engag-
ing copy, and tailor messages to various demographics. This
capability allows marketing teams to stay ahead of consumer
trends with minimal manual effort [2].
Routine communications are essential yet repetitive, such as
customer inquiries, email responses, and internal notifications.
Generative AI excels at automating these interactions. AI-
powered chatbots and virtual assistants handle a vast volume
of customer queries in real time, providing accurate, context-
aware responses. Internally, AI can manage communications
by sending reminders for meetings or deadlines, updating
teams on project statuses, or alerting staff about policy up-
dates. Automating these tasks significantly boosts operational
efficiency, freeing human employees to focus on more strategic
initiatives [11].
The benefits of generative AI in content generation are man-
ifold. It dramatically increases productivity, enabling organiza-
tions to accomplish more in less time. This efficiency allows
teams to redirect their efforts from mundane tasks to more
creative and strategic thinking. Generative AI also ensures
that all produced content adheres to specific brand guidelines
and tone, maintaining consistency across all communications
and strengthening brand identity. Moreover, the scalability
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

5
of content production adjusts effortlessly with generative AI,
meeting higher content demands without additional human
resources.
Furthermore, generative AI can enhance creativity. Handling
the tedious aspects of content creation allows creative profes-
sionals to concentrate on more innovative facets of their work,
such as strategic campaign planning and creative direction. As
AI technology continues to evolve, its potential to support and
enhance the creative processes within organizations appears
limitless. This advancement augments the human workforce
and redefines the possibilities of content creation across in-
dustries [12].
B. Design and Prototyping
Generative AI revolutionizes the prototyping process in
design and engineering, enabling faster iteration and innova-
tion. This technology empowers designers and engineers by
allowing them to generate multiple design variations quickly,
each tailored to meet specified parameters. This capability
significantly accelerates the design cycle, enabling teams to
rapidly explore a wide range of design options without the
traditional reliance on extensive manual input [13].
Generative AI tools integrate seamlessly into the design
workflow, automatically creating diverse design solutions that
can adapt to various challenges and requirements. This not
only speeds up the decision-making process but also enhances
the creative capabilities of design teams. By providing many
design options, AI enables designers to consider alternatives
they might not have conceived manually, pushing the bound-
aries of innovation and aesthetic functionality [14].
The application of generative AI in design and engineering
also extends to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of
the prototyping process. Traditional prototyping can be time-
consuming and costly, particularly when multiple iterations
are necessary. Generative AI mitigates these challenges by
swiftly producing accurate and detailed prototypes based on
the iterative feedback loop, allowing quick adjustments and
refinements. This rapid prototyping ensures that designs are
optimized before entering the production phase, reducing
waste and increasing the overall quality of the final product
[14].
Moreover, generative AI fosters a more dynamic and respon-
sive design environment in this sector. Thanks to the agility
offered by AI-generated prototypes, designers and engineers
can quickly respond to changes in project requirements or
market demands. This responsiveness is crucial in today’s fast-
paced market environments, where the ability to adapt quickly
can provide a significant competitive advantage.
In summary, generative AI’s impact on the design and
engineering sectors marks a significant shift towards more
dynamic, efficient, and innovative practices. The technology
enhances the creative process and reduces the time and cost
associated with traditional prototyping and design refinement,
leading to better products and more inventive solutions in less
time.
C. Customer Service Enhancement
AI-driven systems such as chatbots and virtual assistants are
profoundly transforming customer service. These technologies
deliver round-the-clock service, adeptly handling inquiries and
resolving issues promptly and efficiently. This constant avail-
ability is key in enhancing customer satisfaction, as consumers
increasingly expect immediate responses and solutions outside
of traditional business hours [15].
Integrating chatbots and virtual assistants into customer
service operations ensures that no customer query goes unan-
swered, regardless of the time or volume of requests. This
capability significantly alleviates the workload on human
customer service representatives by managing routine inquiries
and problems, allowing them to focus on more complex and
sensitive issues that require human intervention. As a result,
this improves the speed and quality of service provided to
customers and enhances the overall operational efficiency
within organization [5].
Moreover, AI-driven systems are equipped with advanced
natural language processing abilities that enable them to
understand and respond to a wide range of customer queries
with high accuracy. Over time, these systems learn from inter-
actions and feedback, continuously improving their responses
and their effectiveness in handling inquiries. This learning
capability ensures that the service quality improves contin-
ually, fostering stronger customer relationships and enhancing
customer loyalty to the company [16].
AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants’ efficiency in han-
dling routine tasks also leads to cost savings for organizations.
By automating the initial stages of customer interaction, com-
panies can reduce their reliance on large customer service
teams, decreasing operational costs while maintaining high
service standards [1], [8].
In essence, AI-driven systems like chatbots and virtual assis-
tants are not just revolutionizing customer service by making
it more accessible and responsive—they are also redefining the
economics of customer interaction, making efficient and high-
quality customer service achievable at a significantly reduced
cost. This transformation is crucial for businesses aiming to
stay competitive in an environment where superior customer
service is often the key differentiator.
D. Decision Support Systems
Generative AI is increasingly becoming an indispensable
tool in business strategy and management due to its pro-
found ability to synthesize vast amounts of data and deliver
strategic insights. These AI systems are adept at analyzing
complex datasets, including market trends, consumer behavior,
and financial data, which are crucial for informed decision-
making. By processing and interpreting these diverse data
streams, generative AI provides businesses with actionable
recommendations that can significantly influence and drive
business growth [7], [24].
The utility of generative AI in strategic decision-making lies
in its capacity to uncover patterns and insights that are not
readily apparent through conventional analysis. For example,
by evaluating consumer behavior data, AI can predict future
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

6
buying trends, allowing companies to adjust their strategies
proactively. Similarly, analysis of market trends helps busi-
nesses anticipate market shifts, enabling them to optimize
their operations to exploit these trends effectively [8]. Fur-
thermore, generative AI can enhance financial forecasting, risk
assessment, and resource allocation when applied to financial
data, thereby improving financial management and strategic
investment decisions [1].
These insights provided by generative AI are not only
comprehensive but are also delivered at a speed and accuracy
that far surpass human capabilities. This rapid delivery of
critical information allows management teams to react quickly
to changing market conditions, adjust strategies in real-time,
and maintain a competitive edge in highly dynamic business
environments. AI systems base their strategic recommenda-
tions on a comprehensive analysis of multiple data sources,
ensuring that the choices they make are sound and well-
rounded.
Moreover, generative AI’s role in supporting decision-
making extends to enhancing the granularity of insights.
Businesses can drill down into specifics, such as consumer
preferences at a regional level or performance metrics of spe-
cific product lines, enabling highly targeted strategic actions.
This level of detail empowers businesses to customize their
offerings and optimize their operations with high precision,
leading to improved customer satisfaction and operational
efficiency [6], [15], [17].
In summary, generative AI’s ability to synthesize vast
amounts of data and provide strategic insights revolutionizes
decision-making processes in management. By enabling a
deeper understanding of market dynamics, consumer behav-
ior, and financial variables, AI-driven analytics support the
development of strategies that are not only reactive but also
proactive and predictive. This capability is fundamental for
businesses aiming to thrive in today’s data-driven market
landscape.
E. Fraud Detection
In the financial sector, generative AI has become a critical
asset for enhancing security measures, particularly in fraud
detection. By leveraging advanced algorithms capable of an-
alyzing patterns in transaction data, these AI systems are
proficient at identifying anomalies that may indicate fraud-
ulent activities. This capability allows financial institutions to
proactively respond to potential threats before they materialize
into significant financial losses [3].
Generative AI operates by continuously monitoring trans-
action data across various platforms and channels. It uses
machine learning models trained on vast datasets of legitimate
and fraudulent transactions to understand and predict normal
and aberrant behaviors. When an AI system detects an activity
that deviates from the recognized patterns, it can instantly
flag these transactions for further investigation. This real-
time detection is crucial for preventing fraud, which must be
addressed swiftly to mitigate potential damage [18], [19].
The impact of AI in detecting financial fraud is profound
due to its ability to process and analyze data at a scale and
speed unattainable by human auditors. For example, generative
AI can scrutinize thousands of transactions per second, spot-
ting suspicious activities that could easily be overlooked in
manual checks. This high level of efficiency not only bolsters
the security of financial operations but also enhances the
overall trustworthiness of financial institutions in the eyes of
customers and regulators [4], [8].
Moreover, the adaptability of generative AI systems allows
them to evolve in response to new fraud tactics. Fraudulent
schemes are continually evolving, becoming more sophisti-
cated and harder to detect. Generative AI systems are designed
to learn from new data continuously, updating their models and
improving their predictive accuracy over time. This adaptive
capability ensures that financial institutions can stay ahead of
fraudsters, adjusting their defense mechanisms in alignment
with the ever-changing landscape of financial fraud [20].
In summary, generative AI’s role in the financial sector is
indispensable, particularly in the context of fraud detection.
By analyzing transaction data to detect anomalies and alerting
organizations to potential frauds, AI systems play a pivotal role
in safeguarding financial assets. This technological advance-
ment not only protects financial institutions from significant
losses but also secures the integrity of the financial system as
a whole, thereby maintaining public confidence in economic
transactions.
F. Software Development
AI tools are revolutionizing the software development life-
cycle by enhancing various stages, from initial feature ideation
to the final stages of testing and deployment, as well as
aiding in project management. By integrating AI technologies,
software development teams can automate and optimize signif-
icant portions of the process, substantially reducing the time-
to-market for new software releases and improving overall
productivity and efficiency [14], [25].
During the initial phases of software development, AI excels
in feature ideation and planning. Utilizing algorithms that
analyze user feedback, market trends, and existing system logs,
AI tools can identify potential new features and improvements
that align with user needs and business objectives. This data-
driven approach ensures that the development efforts are
targeted and effective, increasing the chances of the product’s
success in the market [14].
AI further demonstrates its utility in the coding phase
by assisting in code generation. Advanced AI systems with
machine learning and natural language processing capabilities
can understand high-level requirements and translate them into
functional code. These tools can also suggest optimizations
and refactoring recommendations to improve the quality and
performance of the code. This speeds up the development
process and helps maintain a high standard of code quality
by reducing human errors [14].
Testing is another critical phase where AI makes a substan-
tial impact. AI-driven testing tools can automatically generate
test cases based on the code logic and expected behaviors,
ensuring comprehensive coverage. These tools can execute
multiple tests simultaneously, quickly identifying defects and
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

7
areas of concern which might take much longer if done
manually. Moreover, AI can analyze the results of these tests
to pinpoint problematic patterns and suggest specific areas of
the code that need refinement [14].
By automating these significant aspects of the software
development lifecycle, AI tools help reduce the overall devel-
opment time, enabling quicker iterations and faster delivery of
products to the market. This efficiency is particularly valuable
in today’s competitive tech environment where speed and
agility are crucial. Additionally, the automation of routine and
repetitive tasks allows developers to focus more on creative
and high-value aspects of software development, such as de-
signing better user experiences and innovating new solutions.
In summary, AI’s role in the software development lifecycle
is transformative, assisting teams from the ideation phase
through to testing and deployment. By reducing the time-
to-market and enhancing the quality of software products,
AI tools not only streamline development processes but also
contribute to higher productivity, better quality outputs, and
greater innovation in software development projects.
G. Human Resources and Recruitment
Generative AI significantly transforms Human Resources
(HR) management by streamlining and enhancing various
HR processes. This technology is crucial in automating tasks
such as resume screening and managing initial interactions
during employee onboarding [11], [21]. Moreover, it extends
its capabilities to providing strategic advice on employment
conditions and HR policies, ensuring compliance with legal
standards and enhancing employee engagement [26].
In the recruitment process, AI’s application in resume
screening is particularly transformative. Generative AI sys-
tems can quickly analyze thousands of resumes, identifying
candidates whose skills and experiences best match the job
descriptions [22]. This not only speeds up the hiring process
but also ensures a fair and unbiased screening process, as AI
systems can be programmed to ignore demographic informa-
tion, focusing solely on qualifications and experience. This
capability significantly reduces the workload on HR personnel,
allowing them to devote more time to engaging with potential
candidates on a more personal level [22].
During the onboarding process, generative AI enhances the
experience of new hires through automated, personalized in-
teractions. For instance, AI-driven chatbots can handle routine
inquiries from new employees, providing them with timely
and accurate information about company policies, procedural
steps, and resources. This immediate support helps to integrate
new hires into the company more efficiently and makes them
feel valued and supported from day one [8].
Furthermore, generative AI contributes to strategic HR
management by offering insights and recommendations on em-
ployment conditions and HR policies. By analyzing data from
employee feedback, performance evaluations, and compliance
requirements, AI systems can identify areas for improvement
in HR practices and suggest changes that better align with both
organizational goals and employee needs. This strategic input
is invaluable for maintaining an adaptive and responsive HR
management system that supports the organization’s objectives
while fostering a positive work environment.
Technology also plays a pivotal role in ensuring labor laws
and regulations compliance. AI systems can be updated with
the latest legal changes and programmed to review company
policies and practices for compliance. This helps prevent
potential legal issues and ensures that the organization’s HR
practices are always current with current laws, safeguarding
the organization against costly legal challenges.
In summary, generative AI’s impact on HR management
is profound, offering significant improvements in efficiency,
compliance, and employee engagement [27]. By automating
routine tasks, providing strategic advice, and ensuring com-
pliance, AI tools are essential for modern HR departments
striving to attract, retain, and develop talent effectively in a
competitive business landscape.
IV. CHA LL EN GE S FO R INT EG RATI NG GE NE RATI VE A I IN
ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS
Integrating generative AI into organizational settings in-
volves navigating complex challenges encompassing techno-
logical, ethical, and operational domains. These challenges
are multifaceted, requiring concerted efforts to effectively
understand, mitigate, and manage to harness the full potential
of AI technologies (see Table 2). This section investigates
the challenges organizations face when deciding to integrate
generative AI into its operations.
TABLE I
GEN ERATI VE AI INTEGRATION CHALLENGES
Challenge
Cate-
gory
Specific Challenges Source
Technological
Chal-
lenges
- Integration with
legacy systems
- Lack of best practices
and standards
- Continuous evolution
and need for regular
updates
[3], [4], [28]–[31]
Data
Privacy
and
Security
- Managing sensitive
data
- Ensuring robust data
privacy and security
- Addressing biases in
data used for AI
- Need for transparency
in AI decisions
[8], [32]
Ethical
Chal-
lenges
- Bias and
discrimination in
AI decisions
- Opacity of AI
systems (”black box”)
- Resistance to AI
adoption due to fear of
job displacement and
loss of control
[7], [22], [31]
A. Technological Challenges
Integrating Generative AI technologies into existing IT
infrastructures is a complex and challenging endeavor for
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

8
many organizations. These systems are highly sophisticated,
harnessing cutting-edge technology that demands advanced
knowledge and specialized skills that are often scarce. The
requisite expertise to effectively implement and manage these
AI systems can be a significant barrier, particularly for organi-
zations that do not have immediate access to top-tier AI talent
[28].
Moreover, integrating these modern AI technologies with
older, legacy systems introduces another layer of complexity.
Legacy systems are often deeply entrenched in the organi-
zation’s operations and are typically not designed to interact
with newer technologies seamlessly. This mismatch can lead
to significant challenges. Integrating Generative AI requires
substantial modifications to these existing systems—changes
that can disrupt established workflows and require extensive
re-engineering. Such adjustments often demand considerable
time and financial investment and carry a risk of operational
downtime, which can further complicate the integration pro-
cess [3].
Adding to these challenges is that Generative AI, as a
relatively nascent technology, still lacks a comprehensive
framework of best practices and standards. Unlike more ma-
ture technologies, where guidelines and proven methodolo-
gies can guide successful implementation, Generative AI’s
emerging nature means that many organizations are navigating
uncharted territory. This absence of established pathways not
only heightens the risk associated with deployment but also
makes it difficult to predict the outcomes and efficacy of AI
integration efforts. Organizations must often rely on trial and
error to find strategies that work, which can lead to inconsistent
results and uncertainties regarding the long-term viability of
AI projects [29]. Adding to these challenges is that Generative
AI, as a relatively nascent technology, still lacks a comprehen-
sive framework of best practices and standards. Unlike more
mature technologies, where guidelines and proven method-
ologies can guide successful implementation, Generative AI’s
emerging nature means that many organizations are navigating
uncharted territory. This absence of established pathways not
only heightens the risk associated with deployment but also
makes it difficult to predict the outcomes and efficacy of AI
integration efforts. Organizations must often rely on trial and
error to find strategies that work, which can lead to inconsistent
results and uncertainties regarding the long-term viability of
AI projects [30]. Adding to these challenges is that Generative
AI, as a relatively nascent technology, still lacks a comprehen-
sive framework of best practices and standards. Unlike more
mature technologies, where guidelines and proven method-
ologies can guide successful implementation, Generative AI’s
emerging nature means that many organizations are navigating
uncharted territory. This absence of established pathways not
only heightens the risk associated with deployment but also
makes it difficult to predict the outcomes and efficacy of AI
integration efforts. Organizations must often rely on trial and
error to find strategies that work, which can lead to inconsistent
results and uncertainties regarding the long-term viability of
AI projects [4], [31].
The early development stage of Generative AI also implies
that the technology is continuously evolving. While this rapid
innovation drives improvements and new capabilities, it also
means that systems need to be regularly updated or potentially
overhauled to keep pace with advancements. This requirement
for ongoing adaptation can strain resources and complicate the
management of IT systems.
In summary, integrating Generative AI into existing IT in-
frastructures is a multifaceted challenge that involves navigat-
ing technological complexities, adapting to new advancements,
and developing new competencies. Success in these endeavors
requires robust strategic planning, a willingness to invest in
technology and training, and a proactive approach to managing
the inherent uncertainties of pioneering new AI applications.
B. Data Privacy and Security
Integrating AI technologies into organizational systems
raises substantial concerns, particularly regarding managing
sensitive and proprietary data. Ensuring robust data privacy
and security is absolutely critical, as failures in these areas can
lead to significant data breaches and leaks, potentially causing
severe financial, reputational, and legal repercussions for the
organization. The risk of such mishandling necessitates that
organizations rigorously implement comprehensive measures
to secure data throughout its lifecycle, from collection and
storage to processing and deletion [32].
The concerns extend beyond the technical aspects of data
security to encompass the ethical use of the data by AI sys-
tems. When AI technologies process vast amounts of personal
and sensitive data, there is an inherent risk that these systems
might develop biased outputs. This is primarily because AI
systems learn from large datasets that may contain biased
historical data or reflect systemic inequalities. Such biases can
inadvertently be perpetuated and amplified by AI technologies,
leading to outputs that might result in discriminatory practices
against certain groups of individuals. For instance, an AI
system used in hiring processes might develop biases against
certain demographics if not properly checked, potentially
leading to unfair employment practices that discriminate based
on gender, ethnicity, or age.
This scenario underscores the dual necessity for organiza-
tions to secure data against unauthorized access and breaches
and ensure that the data used in training AI systems is free of
biases. Organizations need to implement robust data handling
and processing protocols that align with security standards and
ethical guidelines. This involves adopting data anonymization
techniques, conducting regular audits of AI decisions, and
employing fairness in machine learning algorithms to detect
and mitigate potential biases.
Additionally, the ethical implications of AI extend to trans-
parency in AI decision-making processes. Organizations are
increasingly required to explain the decisions made by their AI
systems, particularly in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and
employment, where these decisions can significantly impact
individuals’ lives. Ensuring transparency helps build trust
among users and stakeholders and facilitates identifying and
correcting biases within AI systems.
Organizations must develop a comprehensive framework
that integrates strong cybersecurity measures, ethical guide-
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

9
lines, and privacy protection strategies to manage these com-
plex issues effectively. This framework should be supported by
ongoing training for staff to raise awareness and understanding
of the complexities involved in AI integration, emphasizing
both the technological and ethical dimensions. Furthermore,
engaging with external regulators and industry bodies to
ensure compliance with the latest data protection laws and
ethical standards is crucial for maintaining the integrity and
trustworthiness of AI applications [8].
In conclusion, integrating AI technologies requires a bal-
anced approach that addresses both the technical and ethical
challenges associated with handling sensitive data. By ensur-
ing rigorous data protection and actively working to eliminate
biases in AI-generated outputs, organizations can harness the
benefits of AI while upholding their ethical responsibilities
and safeguarding against the risks of data misuse.
C. Ethical Challenges
Bias and discrimination in AI-generated content and deci-
sions pose profound ethical challenges in applying AI tech-
nologies. Without careful design and ongoing monitoring, AI
systems risk perpetuating existing societal biases or intro-
ducing new ones, undermining fairness and equality. Real-
world examples illustrate the severity of this issue. For in-
stance, in recruitment, AI-powered tools have been found to
unintentionally favor certain demographics. A notable case
involved an AI-based hiring system that downgraded resumes
with references to women’s colleges, inadvertently reflecting
historical biases in the training data. Similarly, in law enforce-
ment, predictive policing algorithms have disproportionately
flagged minority communities for higher surveillance, further
entrenching systemic inequities. These examples highlight how
biased AI decisions can profoundly impact employment, pub-
lic safety, and equality, disproportionately harming marginal-
ized or underrepresented groups [7].
The inherent complexity and unpredictability of AI systems
exacerbate these challenges. Many AI models, especially those
involving deep learning, function in ways that are not transpar-
ent and are difficult to scrutinize or understand—even by the
developers who build them. This lack of transparency, often
referred to as the ”black box” phenomenon, makes it chal-
lenging to trace the rationale behind AI decisions. A widely
publicized example occurred in the financial sector, where an
AI system used for loan approvals denied applications from
specific minority groups, despite no overt discriminatory rules.
The ”black box” nature of the system made it difficult for the
organization to explain or correct the issue, creating significant
ethical and reputational concerns [31]. Such unpredictability
can lead to scenarios where AI behaves in ways that are unex-
pected, potentially resulting in outcomes that are misaligned
with organizational values and ethics.
Moreover, resistance within organizations to adopting and
integrating AI technologies remains a significant challenge.
This resistance often stems from fears of job displacement,
as AI’s capability to automate tasks—including complex
decision-making processes—can make certain job roles re-
dundant. For instance, customer service departments that im-
plement AI-driven chatbots face pushback from employees
concerned about losing their roles. Additionally, there is a
broader concern about losing control over critical processes, as
decisions increasingly depend on algorithms rather than human
expertise. Such fears are not unfounded; a manufacturing
organization experienced internal opposition after introducing
AI-based predictive maintenance tools, as employees worried
about reduced oversight and diminishing roles in decision-
making processes [22].
This constellation of factors—ethical considerations regard-
ing bias and discrimination, the opaque nature of AI systems,
and internal resistance to technological change—presents a
complex landscape for organizations navigating the integration
of AI. These challenges are not merely theoretical but have
tangible consequences, as evidenced by real-world examples
across industries. Addressing these issues requires a proactive
approach, including rigorous monitoring for bias, enhancing
AI transparency, and implementing change management strate-
gies to alleviate resistance. By acknowledging these practical
implications, organizations can build trust in AI applications
and foster broader acceptance of these technologies while
safeguarding fairness, accountability, and ethical responsibility
in their deployment.
V. ORGANISATIONAL ADOPTION REQ UI RE ME NT S
Implementing generative AI within an organizational con-
text requires a robust understanding of technological and
strategic prerequisites. This section begins by summarizing
these requirements in a comprehensive table that outlines key
factors influencing successful adoption. The table 3 serves as a
preliminary overview, providing a quick snapshot of essential
elements across various dimensions. Subsequent subsections
will dig deeper into each requirement, offering a more detailed
exploration of the challenges, strategies, and considerations
organizations must address to integrate generative AI tech-
nologies effectively. This dual approach ensures a thorough
understanding of the prerequisites for successful implementa-
tion and the practical steps needed.
A. Resource Requirements
1) Resource Availability: Successfully implementing Gen-
erative AI technologies within an organization requires sub-
stantial financial and human resources to overcome initial
barriers such as high costs of advanced technology acquisition,
expenses for upgrading existing systems, and the investment
in training or hiring skilled personnel [1], [14]. Larger organi-
zations typically benefit from more extensive resource pools,
allowing them to absorb the high upfront costs associated with
deploying Generative AI, including purchasing licenses and
investing in necessary infrastructure upgrades [1], [14].
The financial requirements extend beyond direct costs to
include ancillary expenses like system integration, data secu-
rity enhancements, and compliance with regulatory standards
[19], [33]. Additionally, ongoing maintenance and updates are
crucial for keeping AI systems effective and secure.
On the human resources front, the deployment of Generative
AI necessitates skilled personnel to manage both integration
and ongoing operations. This often involves either training
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

10
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF ORGANISATIONAL ADOPTION REQU IR EME NT S FOR
GEN ERATI VE AI
Requirement Source
Financial and human re-
sources for initial AI inte-
gration
[1], [14]
Investment in technology
acquisition and system up-
grades
[1], [14]
Covering ancillary
expenses like system
integration
[19], [33]
High-performance
computing environments
[3], [6]
Agile, scalable, and secure
software systems
[10]
Specialized knowledge in
AI for personnel
[3], [5], [33]
Compliance with regula-
tory frameworks
[34]–[37]
System adaptability to new
AI technologies
[14], [38], [39]
Ethical management of AI
including bias detection
[34], [40], [41]
Continuous updating of AI
models
[42]
existing employees or hiring new staff, which can be costly
and time-consuming but essential for leveraging AI effectively
[2], [16], [21], [22].
Organizations, especially larger ones with better financial
and human capital, need thorough planning to ensure that
budgets reflect the true costs of AI integration and that
staffing strategies align with technological ambitions. This
strategic alignment is crucial for successful AI adoption and
maximizing its potential for innovation and efficiency.
2) Technological Proficiency: For effective integration of
Generative AI, organizations must possess adequate IT in-
frastructure and technical skills, extending beyond physical
hardware to encompass comprehensive software capabilities
and personnel expertise.
The backbone of AI deployment is robust and high-
performance computing environments, capable of handling
large data volumes and complex computations [3], [6]. State-
of-the-art servers, high-speed networking equipment, and scal-
able data storage facilities are essential.
Software capabilities are critical, including AI applications
and supporting systems like data management platforms,
security software, and integration tools to ensure seamless
communication within the IT landscape [10]. These systems
must be agile, scalable, and secure to meet the dynamic needs
of AI operations.
Personnel expertise is also crucial. Integrating Generative AI
requires specialized knowledge in machine learning, data sci-
ence, and system integration [33]. Staff must manage ongoing
operations and maintenance efficiently and securely [3], [5].
This often requires significant training investments or hiring
new employees with the necessary skills and may involve
partnerships with external AI implementation specialists [11].
B. Regulatory and Compatibility Considerations
1) Regulatory Environment: A supportive regulatory frame-
work is essential for fostering innovation and managing the
risks associated with AI technologies. This framework should
guide AI development and deployment within a safe and
ethically responsible context [34]. Clear regulatory guidelines
are increasingly crucial as AI impacts various industries and
aspects of daily life [35].
Regulations demystify the legal implications of AI de-
ployment, providing clarity for organizations to innovate
confidently and ensure compliance with current laws [36].
A supportive framework also helps navigate complex legal
landscapes involving novel data uses and societal impacts,
updating older norms to reflect challenges like data privacy,
bias mitigation, and accountability [37].
A proactive regulatory approach anticipates potential risks,
establishing measures to mitigate these before they become
widespread, thus protecting both the public and organizations
from future liabilities and maintaining trust in AI technologies.
2) System Compatibility: Integrating Generative AI into an
organization’s existing IT landscape and business processes
requires adaptable systems to ensure seamless incorporation
that complements and enhances existing workflows [14].
Existing IT infrastructures must be capable of supporting the
computing demands of Generative AI, including substantial
processing power and robust data management capabilities. If
systems are not sufficiently adaptable, integration may cause
significant operational disruptions.
Business processes also need flexibility to integrate AI so-
lutions effectively. This might involve reevaluating workflows
and decision-making processes to fully utilize AI capabilities,
such as automating customer service responses [38]. AI tools
should align with existing business processes and be user-
friendly to minimize resistance and facilitate smooth transi-
tions [39].
Ongoing support and maintenance are essential for ensuring
that AI systems remain aligned with evolving business needs
and IT capabilities, necessitating continuous updates and op-
timizations.
C. Strategic and Operational Challenges
1) Adoption Strategies: The successful adoption of Genera-
tive AI tools requires compatibility with existing development
workflows to ensure seamless integration and to augment
rather than disrupt established processes [3], [42]. Strategic
planning must address both technical aspects and organi-
zational resistance due to the perceived complexity of AI
technologies.
AI tools should be tailored to fit current software devel-
opment cycles, possibly enhancing automated testing, code
generation, or requirement gathering [14]. Organizations must
communicate the benefits clearly, provide comprehensive
training, and demonstrate how AI complements human roles
[43].
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

11
Support structures such as training sessions and technical
support are crucial for helping employees adapt to new tools,
increasing organizational buy-in and facilitating the effective
leverage of AI’s capabilities [44].
2) Infrastructure and Training: Developing a robust tech-
nological infrastructure is foundational for AI integration,
requiring powerful computing hardware, scalable software
infrastructure, and adequate network and data storage solutions
[42]. Organizations must also address security and privacy
concerns by implementing stringent data protection measures
and developing policies for data usage and sharing [?], [36].
Ongoing training and support for software engineers and
IT staff are critical for smooth transitions to AI-enhanced
workflows. Regular updates to AI models and technologies
necessitate continuous professional development and adapta-
tion within the organization.
3) Ethical and Legal Considerations: Managing AI out-
puts’ ethical implications and biases is imperative for or-
ganizations using AI technologies. A well-defined strategy
should include robust data governance policies and continuous
updates to AI models to maintain their accuracy and relevance
[34], [45].
Organizations must address potential biases arising from
training data or algorithm design, employing diverse datasets
and fairness-promoting algorithms [40]. Strong data gover-
nance is essential for protecting sensitive information and
ensuring compliance with relevant data protection regulations
[41].
Updating AI models in response to new data and changing
business contexts is crucial for maintaining their effectiveness
and relevance [42]. Collaborative efforts across data science,
legal, compliance, and operational teams are essential for inte-
grating ethical considerations into the AI lifecycle, mitigating
risks, and building trust.
VI. DISCUSSION
This section defines the implications of our systematic
literature review, exploring both the theoretical and practical
aspects. We also highlight potential avenues for future research
that arise from our findings.
A. Theoretical Implications
Integrating generative AI into organizational settings
presents a rich area for theoretical exploration. Our review
enriches the current body of knowledge by positioning gener-
ative AI as both a technological advancement and a strategic
tool that significantly reshapes organizational dynamics and
competitive strategies. This approach not only supports but
also expands existing theories in information systems and man-
agement, particularly those addressing technology adoption,
organizational change, and innovation management.
Our systematic review of generative AI’s applications and
the challenges associated with its integration underscores
that technology adoption is a complex, multifaceted pro-
cess influenced by both technical capabilities and socio-
organizational factors. This complexity is well articulated
through the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE)
framework, which examines the influence of technological,
organizational, and environmental contexts on the adoption
and implementation of new technologies [46]. Our findings
suggest that future theoretical models need to account for the
nuanced impacts of advanced AI technologies. They propose
an expanded view of the TOE framework, including considera-
tions specific to AI capabilities, such as machine learning and
natural language processing, and their implications for data
governance and ethics.
Moreover, the Diffusion of Innovations (DoI) theory pro-
vides a complementary perspective, focusing on how inno-
vations like generative AI are adopted within an organization.
This theory highlights several key factors—relative advantage,
compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability—that
influence the rate and extent of adoption. Generative AI,
with its potential to automate complex tasks and provide
new insights through data analysis, offers significant relative
advantages. However, its complexity and the need for sub-
stantial organizational change challenge its rapid adoption. By
integrating DoI theory, we gain deeper insights into how these
attributes interact with organizational strategies to facilitate or
hinder the assimilation of generative AI technologies [47].
Additionally, the strategic deployment of generative AI is
discussed through the lens of resource-based views (RBV),
which emphasize the role of unique and valuable resources in
building competitive advantage. Generative AI can be viewed
as a strategic resource that, when effectively leveraged, can
provide organizations with a significant edge over competitors
by enhancing decision-making, increasing operational effi-
ciency, and fostering innovation. This discussion encourages a
reevaluation of RBV in the context of digital transformation,
where intangible assets like data and algorithms become
critical components of organizational strategy [48].
In conclusion, our review suggests that integrating gen-
erative AI within organizational settings not only catalyzes
technological and strategic shifts but also necessitates a the-
oretical reevaluation in the domains of information systems
and strategic management. By extending the TOE framework,
applying DoI theory, and revisiting RBV, this study offers
a robust theoretical scaffold that can guide future research
and help practitioners navigate the complexities of adopting
generative AI in an ever-evolving technological landscape.
B. Practical Implications
From a practical and managerial standpoint, this review’s
findings have substantial implications for organizational lead-
ers and IT managers navigating the integration of generative
AI into business operations. Firstly, identifying key application
areas for generative AI, such as content generation, customer
interaction, and design prototyping, helps pinpoint where
investments can yield significant improvements in efficiency,
innovation, and customer engagement. Decision-makers are
encouraged to view generative AI as an integral component of
their digital transformation strategies, especially in industries
that demand high levels of creativity and personalization.
For practical implementation, understanding the integration
challenges is crucial. This knowledge can guide organizations
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

12
in preparing more effectively for the adoption process. For
instance, anticipating employee resistance to new AI tools can
lead organizations to prioritize investments in comprehensive
training programs and change management initiatives. These
efforts can facilitate a smoother transition by aligning em-
ployee skills and attitudes with the new technology-enhanced
workflows, thereby reducing friction and enhancing acceptance
across the organization.
Moreover, the practical deployment of generative AI re-
quires a proactive approach to ethical considerations and data
privacy concerns. Organizations should establish robust gov-
ernance frameworks that define clear guidelines and protocols
for AI operations, ensuring that all activities are transpar-
ent and comply with regulatory standards. Such frameworks
should not only focus on legal compliance but also on ethical
considerations, such as fairness, accountability, and trans-
parency, which are crucial for building and maintaining trust
among stakeholders.
Managerially, leaders must also foster a culture that supports
ongoing learning and adaptation to technological advance-
ments. By cultivating an environment where innovation is
encouraged and supported, organizations can more effectively
leverage generative AI capabilities to stay competitive. This
involves not only providing the necessary tools and training
but also recognizing and rewarding innovative ideas and ap-
plications of AI within the company.
In conclusion, the practical application of generative AI
in organizational settings requires a multifaceted approach.
Leaders must strategically invest in technology that aligns with
business goals, prepare the organization for change, address
ethical and regulatory concerns, and nurture a culture of
innovation. These steps will ensure that the deployment of
generative AI contributes positively to the organization’s long-
term success and sustainability.
1) Managerial Implications for SMEs: Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) face unique challenges in adopting gen-
erative AI due to resource constraints and limited technical
expertise. Cost-effective integration strategies are crucial, and
SMEs should prioritize accessible solutions like cloud-based
AI tools or open-source platforms. These options reduce
the need for significant upfront investment in hardware and
software, allowing SMEs to leverage generative AI capabilities
within their budgets. Partnerships with technology providers
offering flexible payment models or technical support can
further ease the adoption process.
Operational efficiency is a key area where SMEs can benefit
from generative AI. Automating routine tasks such as customer
support, social media content creation, and data analysis can
save time and resources, enabling SMEs to focus on strategic
growth initiatives. For instance, deploying AI-driven chatbots
can enhance customer engagement without requiring extensive
human intervention. However, given the smaller scale of oper-
ations, SMEs need to ensure their AI solutions are adaptable
and scalable, allowing them to grow alongside the business.
Building AI literacy among staff is another priority for
SMEs. Limited access to in-house technical expertise necessi-
tates investments in short-term training programs or collabo-
rations with local academic institutions to upskill employees.
By equipping their teams with the necessary skills, SMEs can
foster a culture of innovation while minimizing resistance to
AI adoption.
Data privacy and ethical considerations are critical for SMEs
to build customer trust. Implementing robust data protection
measures, such as data encryption and compliance with privacy
regulations, helps avoid legal risks and enhances stakeholder
confidence. With fewer resources to manage crises, proactive
measures in these areas are vital for SMEs.
In summary, SMEs should adopt a lean, scalable approach
to generative AI, focusing on tools and strategies that align
with their resource limitations while enabling operational
improvements and growth.
2) Managerial Implications for Large Organisations: For
large organizations, generative AI adoption involves strategic
alignment with overarching business objectives and leveraging
advanced capabilities at scale. Unlike SMEs, large enterprises
have the resources to invest significantly in high-performance
computing environments, scalable cloud platforms, and in-
frastructure upgrades to support generative AI integration.
This enables them to deploy complex AI solutions across
multiple departments, including supply chain management,
fraud detection, and predictive analytics.
Generative AI in large organizations can streamline com-
plex operations and enhance decision-making processes. For
instance, AI-driven predictive modeling can analyze market
trends and consumer behavior across global markets, providing
actionable insights at a scale that SMEs cannot achieve.
Additionally, large organizations can integrate AI into their
customer relationship management systems, creating person-
alized experiences for millions of customers.
Workforce transformation is critical for large enterprises,
where generative AI adoption often necessitates significant
change management. Organizations must invest in continu-
ous training programs to ensure employees across various
functions understand and utilize AI tools effectively. Trans-
parent communication is essential to address concerns about
job displacement and to foster a culture of innovation that
complements human skills with AI capabilities.
Addressing ethical and regulatory complexities is more
pronounced for large organizations due to their exposure to
greater public scrutiny and stringent regulations. Establishing
dedicated AI ethics boards and governance frameworks helps
manage bias, transparency, and accountability risks. Large
organizations must also ensure compliance with international
regulations, which adds complexity to their AI governance
strategies compared to SMEs.
Moreover, the scale of operations in large organizations ne-
cessitates cross-functional collaboration. Integrating generative
AI requires cooperation between IT, marketing, operations,
and legal teams to ensure cohesive implementation that aligns
with the organization’s goals and values. This multidisciplinary
approach helps large organizations navigate the complexities
of generative AI adoption effectively.
In summary, while SMEs adopt generative AI to optimize
resource-constrained operations, large organizations leverage
their extensive resources to scale AI applications, manage
complex systems, and address ethical and regulatory chal-
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

13
lenges. The adoption strategies differ significantly, with SMEs
prioritizing cost-efficiency and flexibility, while large organi-
zations emphasize strategic integration, infrastructure invest-
ment, and governance. These differences reflect the varied
scales and scopes of generative AI’s transformative impact
across organizational sizes.
C. Future Research Directions
Our review illuminates several promising directions for
future research on generative AI, highlighting the need for
both theoretical and practical advancements. One vital area
is the development of empirical studies to test and refine
the theoretical models related to the adoption and strategic
implications of generative AI. Conducting longitudinal studies
would be particularly beneficial, offering insights into how
the advantages and challenges associated with generative AI
evolve as the technology and organizational practices around
it mature. Such studies could trace the trajectory of generative
AI integration, examining shifts in organizational culture, skill
requirements, and strategic outcomes.
Another significant area for research involves exploring the
impact of generative AI across different sectors, each with its
unique characteristics and regulatory challenges. For example,
in healthcare, research could focus on how generative AI could
enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalize treatment plans, and
streamline administrative operations, all while adhering to
stringent privacy regulations. In finance, studies might explore
the implications of AI in risk assessment and fraud detection,
assessing the balance between technological benefits and the
risks of algorithmic bias. Education could benefit from re-
search into AI-driven personalization of learning and its effects
on educational accessibility and equity.
Moreover, there is a pressing need to develop more sophisti-
cated models to manage the ethical implications of generative
AI. Future research should prioritize the design of algorithms
that are not only effective but also demonstrably fair and
unbiased. This involves creating frameworks and tools to iden-
tify and mitigate biases in training data and algorithmic de-
cisions. Research into techniques for enhancing transparency
and explainability in AI systems is also crucial. Developing
methodologies to clarify how AI models make their decisions
could help demystify AI operations, thus fostering greater trust
and acceptance among users and stakeholders.
Furthermore, future investigations should consider the so-
ciotechnical systems in which generative AI operates, exam-
ining the interplay between technology, people, and organiza-
tional processes. This approach would provide a more holistic
understanding of how generative AI can be integrated into
existing systems in an innovative and ethically responsible
manner.
By addressing these areas, future research can provide
valuable insights that guide the development, implementation,
and governance of generative AI technologies, ensuring they
are used responsibly and effectively across various sectors.
This will advance the field theoretically and provide practical
benefits that align with societal values and organizational
goals.
VII. CONCLUSION AND RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
This study conducted a systematic literature review to
explore the integration of generative AI within organizational
settings, identifying key applications, integration challenges,
and adoption requirements. Our findings reveal that generative
AI holds substantial promise for enhancing organizational
efficiency and fostering innovation across various domains,
including content management, customer service, and design
prototyping. Strategically, generative AI can significantly alter
the competitive landscape by offering organizations the tools
to transform their operational processes and customer interac-
tions.
Practically, the insights provided by this review guide orga-
nizations in prioritizing areas for AI implementation, preparing
for potential challenges, and leveraging AI technologies to
achieve strategic advantages. Theoretically, this work extends
current understanding in technology adoption and organiza-
tional change, suggesting that generative AI is a pivotal force
in the ongoing evolution of business practices.
While this review provides comprehensive insights into
the applications and implications of generative AI, several
limitations must be acknowledged. First, the rapid pace of
technological advancement in AI may outdate some of our
findings, necessitating continual updates to the literature re-
view to maintain its relevance. The dynamic nature of AI
technology and its applications implies that new challenges
and solutions may emerge that were not covered in this review.
Secondly, the study relies heavily on published academic
and industry literature, which may not capture the full spec-
trum of organizational experiences with generative AI, par-
ticularly in regions or sectors that are underrepresented in
scholarly research. This could limit the generalizability of the
findings across different cultural and regulatory environments.
Furthermore, the theoretical frameworks used to interpret
the data were chosen based on their prevalence in the literature
but may not fully account for all aspects of generative AI
integration. Future studies could expand on the theoretical
base by incorporating perspectives from emerging theories or
interdisciplinary approaches.
Lastly, this review does not explore the technical specifica-
tions of generative AI systems or their underlying algorithms.
A more detailed technical analysis could provide additional
insights into why specific AI applications succeed or fail,
which could be valuable for practitioners and researchers.
REFERENCES
[1] B. Chen, Z. Wu, and R. Zhao, “From fiction to fact: the growing role
of generative ai in business and finance,” Journal of Chinese Economic
and Business Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 471–496, 2023.
[2] N. Haefner and O. Gassmann, “Generative ai and ai-based business
model innovation,” Journal of Business Models, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 46–
50, 2023.
[3] K. Prasad Agrawal, “Towards adoption of generative ai in organizational
settings,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp. 1–16, 2023.
[4] N. Rane, “Chatgpt and similar generative artificial intelligence (ai)
for smart industry: role, challenges and opportunities for industry 4.0,
industry 5.0 and society 5.0,” Challenges and Opportunities for Industry,
vol. 4, 2023.
[5] E. Suvanto, “Applications of generative ai in business,” 2023.
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

14
[6] S. F. Wamba, M. M. Queiroz, C. J. C. Jabbour, and C. V. Shi, “Are both
generative ai and chatgpt game changers for 21st-century operations
and supply chain excellence?” International Journal of Production
Economics, vol. 265, p. 109015, 2023.
[7] S. Houde, V. Liao, J. Martino, M. Muller, D. Piorkowski, J. Richards,
J. Weisz, and Y. Zhang, “Business (mis) use cases of generative ai,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.07679, 2020.
[8] M. Chui, R. Roberts, and L. Yee, “Generative ai is here: How tools like
chatgpt could change your business,” Quantum Black AI by McKinsey,
vol. 20, 2022.
[9] M. Azzam and R. Beckmann, “How ai helps to increase organizations’
capacity to manage complexity–a research perspective and solution
approach bridging different disciplines,” IEEE Transactions on Engi-
neering Management, 2022.
[10] J. Dencik, B. Goehring, and A. Marshall, “Managing the emerging role
of generative ai in next-generation business,” Strategy & Leadership,
vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 30–36, 2023.
[11] N. Rane, “Role of chatgpt and similar generative artificial intelligence
(ai) in construction industry,” Available at SSRN 4598258, 2023.
[12] M. Arenander, “Technology acceptance for ai implementations: A case
study in the defense industry about 3d generative models,” 2023.
[13] J. P. Davis and J. B. Li, “Early adoption of generative ai by global
business leaders: Insights from an insead alumni survey,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:2404.04543, 2024.
[14] D. Russo, “Navigating the complexity of generative ai adoption in
software engineering,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and
Methodology, 2024.
[15] J. Morton, “Generative ai adoption and three traps for organizational
agility,” California Management Review Insights, 2024.
[16] M. Yin, B. Han, S. Ryu, and M. Hua, “Acceptance of generative ai
in the creative industry: Examining the role of ai anxiety in the utaut2
model,” in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Springer, 2023, pp. 288–310.
[17] Y. Li and S. O. Lee, “Navigating the generative ai travel landscape: the
influence of chatgpt on the evolution from new users to loyal adopters,”
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2024.
[18] W. Y. Hu, “The adoption of generative ai chatbots in an organizational
setting-a case study approach,” 2024.
[19] Y. K. Dwivedi, N. Pandey, W. Currie, and A. Micu, “Leveraging chatgpt
and other generative artificial intelligence (ai)-based applications in
the hospitality and tourism industry: practices, challenges and research
agenda,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Manage-
ment, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024.
[20] D. Humphreys, A. Koay, D. Desmond, and E. Mealy, “Ai hype as a
cyber security risk: the moral responsibility of implementing generative
ai in business,” AI and Ethics, pp. 1–14, 2024.
[21] C. Nugent, I. Cleland, L. Nugent, M. E. Estevez, A. M. Lendinez,
D. Craig, F. Agnoloni, and E. Tamburini, “Using generative ai to assist
with technology adoption assessment,” in International Conference on
Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 2023, pp.
202–207.
[22] P. W. Cardon, K. Getchell, S. Carradini, C. Fleischmann, and J. Stapp,
“Generative ai in the workplace: Employee perspectives of chatgpt
benefits and organizational policies,” 2023.
[23] N. Kshetri, D. Rojas-Torres, M. M. Hanafi, M. Al-kfairy, G. O’Keefe,
and N. Feeney, “Harnessing generative artificial intelligence: A game-
changer for small and medium enterprises,” IT Professional, vol. 26,
no. 6, pp. 84–89, 2025.
[24] N. Virmani, R. K. Singh, V. Agarwal, and E. Aktas, “Artificial intelli-
gence applications for responsive healthcare supply chains: A decision-
making framework,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,
2024.
[25] M. Odeh, “The role of artificial intelligence in project management,”
IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2023.
[26] H. Zhang, “Exploring the impact of ai on human resource management:
A case study of organizational adaptation and employee dynamics,”
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024.
[27] M. B. Schrettenbrunnner, “Artificial-intelligence-driven management,”
IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 15–19, 2020.
[28] N. Rane, “Contribution of chatgpt and other generative artificial intel-
ligence (ai) in renewable and sustainable energy,” Available at SSRN
4597674, 2023.
[29] A. Bandi, P. V. S. R. Adapa, and Y. E. V. P. K. Kuchi, “The power of
generative ai: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats,
evaluation metrics, and challenges,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 8, p.
260, 2023.
[30] J. D. Weisz, J. He, M. Muller, G. Hoefer, R. Miles, and W. Geyer,
“Design principles for generative ai applications,” in Proceedings of the
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2024, pp.
1–22.
[31] M. Bano, Z. Chaudhri, and D. Zowghi, “The role of generative ai
in global diplomatic practices: A strategic framework,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:2401.05415, 2023.
[32] Q. Bi, “Analysis of the application of generative ai in business man-
agement,” Advances in Economics and Management Research, vol. 6,
no. 1, pp. 36–36, 2023.
[33] L. Ales, C. Combemale, and K. Ramayya, “Generative ai, adoption and
the structure of tasks,” Available at SSRN 4786671, 2024.
[34] M. Al-kfairy, D. Mustafa, N. Kshetri, M. Insiew, and O. Alfandi, “A
systematic review and analysis of ethical challenges of generative ai:
An interdisciplinary perspective,” Available at SSRN 4833030.
[35] L. Cheng and X. Liu, “Unravelling power of the unseen: Towards
an interdisciplinary synthesis of generative ai regulation,” International
Journal of Digital Law and Governance, no. 0, 2024.
[36] S. Reddy, “Generative ai in healthcare: an implementation science
informed translational path on application, integration and governance,”
Implementation Science, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 27, 2024.
[37] R. Sabherwal and V. Grover, “The societal impacts of generative artificial
intelligence: A balanced perspective,” Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2024.
[38] A. Beheshti, J. Yang, Q. Z. Sheng, B. Benatallah, F. Casati, S. Dustdar,
H. R. M. Nezhad, X. Zhang, and S. Xue, “Processgpt: transforming
business process management with generative artificial intelligence,” in
2023 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS). IEEE,
2023, pp. 731–739.
[39] D. K. Kanbach, L. Heiduk, G. Blueher, M. Schreiter, and A. Lahmann,
“The genai is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a
business model innovation perspective,” Review of Managerial Science,
vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1189–1220, 2024.
[40] M. Zhou, V. Abhishek, T. Derdenger, J. Kim, and K. Srinivasan, “Bias
in generative ai,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02726, 2024.
[41] J. Schneider, R. Abraham, and C. Meske, “Governance of generative
artificial intelligence for companies,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08802,
2024.
[42] R. Gupta, K. Nair, M. Mishra, B. Ibrahim, and S. Bhardwaj, “Adoption
and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: Theoretical under-
pinnings and research agenda,” International Journal of Information
Management Data Insights, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 100232, 2024.
[43] A. wael AL-khatib, “Drivers of generative artificial intelligence to
fostering exploitative and exploratory innovation: A toe framework,”
Technology in Society, vol. 75, p. 102403, 2023.
[44] E. Brynjolfsson, D. Li, and L. R. Raymond, “Generative ai at work,”
National Bureau of Economic Research, Tech. Rep., 2023.
[45] D. Sweenor and K. Ramanathan, The CIO’s Guide to Adopting Gener-
ative AI: Five Keys to Success. TinyTechMedia LLC, 2023.
[46] J. Baker, “The technology–organization–environment framework,” Infor-
mation Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society,
Vol. 1, pp. 231–245, 2012.
[47] J. W. Dearing and J. G. Cox, “Diffusion of innovations theory, principles,
and practice,” Health affairs, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2018.
[48] P. M. Madhani, “Resource based view (rbv) of competitive advantage:
an overview,” Resource based view: concepts and practices, Pankaj
Madhani, ed, pp. 3–22, 2010.
This article has been accepted for publication in IEEE Engineering Management Review. This is the author's version which has not been fully edited and
content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/EMR.2025.3534034
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/