ArticlePublisher preview available

Tensions, Engagements, and Activisms along the Pipeline Route: Tracing Resistance to Line 93 in Northern Minnesota

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

Enbridge crude oil pipelines have been operational on Anishinaabe treaty lands in northern Minnesota, for over 70 years, carrying crude oil from the Alberta tar sands to refineries in Wisconsin. It was not until the replacement of Line 3 with the Line 93 pipeline in 2015 that large-scale social unrest was sparked. Indigenous and non-Indigenous Water Protectors joined together in civil disobedience to halt the construction of Line 93 due to its violations of Indigenous sovereignty and its potential for environmental impacts. On October 1, 2021, the replacement construction was finished; Line 3 was deactivated; the replacement Line 93 began transporting oil; and the resistance mostly subsided. In this paper, I explore the role of archaeology within this conflict as both a methodology for engaging with the materiality of oil infrastructure and as a stakeholder and ally of decolonial social movements through collected archaeological and ethnographic data along the pipeline route.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-025-00779-5
Tensions, Engagements, andActivisms alongthePipeline
Route: Tracing Resistance toLine 93 inNorthern Minnesota
RyanRybka1
Accepted: 4 January 2025
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
2025
Abstract
Enbridge crude oil pipelines have been operational on Anishinaabe treaty lands in
northern Minnesota, for over 70 years, carrying crude oil from the Alberta tar sands
to refineries in Wisconsin. It was not until the replacement of Line 3 with the Line
93 pipeline in 2015 that large-scale social unrest was sparked. Indigenous and non-
Indigenous Water Protectors joined together in civil disobedience to halt the con-
struction of Line 93 due to its violations of Indigenous sovereignty and its potential
for environmental impacts. On October 1, 2021, the replacement construction was
finished; Line 3 was deactivated; the replacement Line 93 began transporting oil;
and the resistance mostly subsided. In this paper, I explore the role of archaeology
within this conflict as both a methodology for engaging with the materiality of oil
infrastructure and as a stakeholder and ally of decolonial social movements through
collected archaeological and ethnographic data along the pipeline route.
Keywords Contemporary Archaeology· Anthropocene· Activism· Midwest· Oil
Pipeline
Introduction
Anishinaabe activist, Winona LaDuke (2020:81) describes the present moment as
a time foretold by Lakota prophecy in which a “great black snake would come to
the land, bringing sickness and destruction.” This black snake is the Dakota Access
Pipeline (DAPL) currently transporting oil from North Dakota to Illinois and came
to national attention in 2016 when the Standing Rock Sioux Nation challenged its
clear treaty and environmental violations (Estes 2019) through nonviolent resist-
ance. While the legality of DAPL continues to be fought in court, DAPL was
* Ryan Rybka
rrybka@umass.edu
1 Anthropology Department, University ofMassachusetts Amherst, Machmer Hall, 240 Hicks
Way, Amherst, MA01003, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
The relationship between heritage and waste in the context of the Anthropocene has always been intricate. Historically, heritage and waste were viewed as opposing concepts, but in the Anthropocene, they are inextricably linked and interwoven, resulting in the creation of in situ and ex situ productions that leave deep imprints on their territories. How we deal with these landscapes of waste, or wastescapes, as a form of modern heritage is increasingly a concern for museums, which have a potentially pivotal role in addressing the phenomenon of global waste and educating the public about responsible consumption. The review of diverse exhibitions and artworks explores the cultural and social dimensions of waste, considering it as a form of modern heritage derived from and shaped by human activities that have become a planetary phenomenon in the twenty‐first century. It also unveils the connections between economic power, waste management, and environmental impact. In conclusion, current museum practice responds to a reevaluation of what is considered material culture, understanding it as testimonies of the present, with the aim of highlighting the role of museums as platforms for critically examining complex issues related to waste, enabling diverse ways of addressing the environmental and social injustices associated with waste management.
Article
In northern Minnesota, the Line 3 tar sands pipeline crosses Indigenous treaty territory, the Mississippi River, and wild rice lakes. Despite the severity of climate crisis and widespread public opposition, Canadian pipeline company Enbridge succeeded in securing permits for, constructing, and ultimately running oil in the pipeline in fall 2021. How was this possible and how did the climate justice movement try to resist? Drawing on participant observation and interviews in the Stop Line 3 movement, this article employs LeQuesne's (2019) concepts of petro-hegemony and carbon rebellion to explain why Line 3 was approved and to assess water protectors' resistance. Analyzing three terrains of power, we find that: 1) the petro-state of Minnesota employed coercion through undemocratic, colonized, and militarized permitting processes and construction; 2) Enbridge manufactured consent through a petro-culture that framed water protectors as dangerous, highlighted economic benefits to rural towns, and co-opted Indigenous voices; and, 3) by overstating its contributions to jobs and taxes, Enbridge tried to secure broad compliance to the pipeline through petro-capitalism, but ultimately failed. Water protectors intervened in all three of these terrains of power by using legal avenues to shake the petro-state, creating cultures to refuse colonialism and embrace climate justice within water protector camps, and building an Indigenous-led renewable energy economy. We contribute a joint analysis of petro-hegemony and carbon rebellion that reveals the need for balanced and stronger resistance in all three terrains of power to stop future petro-projects and dismantle existing petro-infrastructure.
Chapter
Q. Edward Wang’s unparalleled four-volume survey of historiography examines the nature and significance of history writing from ancient worlds to the present day. Taking a global approach, it presents and contextualizes classic works that portray the traditions of historical writing around the world. The collection also incorporates key essays and articles from the eighteenth century to the present that analyze the continuities and transformations that have existed and taken place within those traditions. Edited by a world-renowned, leading scholar in the field, the four volumes cover the ancient and medieval eras, the Renaissance period through to the 18th century, the rise of the Rankean school and ‘scientific history’ in the West, and new developments in worldwide historiography from the 1990s to the present day. As well as substantial contextualizing editor introductions for each volume, there are 60 individual essays and extracts included across the set, with notions of time, antiquarianism, the Annales School and postcolonialism all key topics at the heart of this vital collection. This is an essential resource for all scholars interested in historiography and the development of history as a discipline.
Article
This paper explores the relationship between world wars and sociotechnical transitions in energy, food, and transport. We utilise and contribute to the Deep Transitions framework, which explores long-term, multi-systemic sociotechnical transitions and integrate a conceptual approach tailored to this particular topic. This approach bridges between historical literatures focused on world wars and sociotechnical perspectives. We explore in what ways the three sociotechnical systems of energy, food, and transport were influenced by the conditions of the First and Second World War and the extent to which these developments influenced lasting change. Our framework is based around three analytical steps: first, we analyse sociotechnical developments during wartime through the interpretive lens of mechanisms of total war. Second, we examine these developments in terms of how they can be interpreted as influencing the development of rules and metarules in sociotechnical systems. Third, we focus on the legacy of 'total war' utilising the concept of imprinting to examine the rules-based, infrastructural, and wider symbolic and cultural legacy of world wars in peacetime. This paper presents a novel interpretation of world war and sociotechnical transitions and contributes to a specific query of the Deep Transitions framework regarding the role of war in the emergence of the first deep transition. We consider the significance of this analysis in the context of sustainability transitions research.
Article
Public and professional responses to the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protests reveal a space where archaeologists can potentially connect past and present. Archaeology has already been applied to protests over labor conditions, environment destruction, and weapons proliferation in both the United States and United Kingdom. Extending that work to Native American protests raises awareness of the legacy of the broken treaties that underlie many of these actions. For example, the 1969–1971 occupation of Alcatraz Island is where contemporary Native American protest history often begins. A simple pushpin map of protests since then shows that the DAPL protest at Standing Rock was unique only in its extensive media coverage. Building greater awareness of these actions will improve the ways archaeologists carry out their compliance responsibilities and respond to an often-misinformed public. Working with tribal colleagues to identify protest sites would enhance existing efforts to protect ancient sites and reinforce the need for tribal input in evaluating impacts to its cultural landscapes.