ArticlePDF Available

Relation Of Vitamin D Level With Glycemic Status In Type2 Diabetes Mellitus

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Worldwide the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has increased dramatically in last two decades, from 30 million cases in 1985 to 415 million in 2017. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) predicts that 642 million people will have DM by the year 2040 (1). Few studies have demonstrated the inverse relationship between serum vitamin D level and prevalence of type 2 DM (2), and by supplementing vitamin D the incidence of DM can be decreased (3).
Content may be subject to copyright.
10289 Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 27, No.4s (December) 2024 Dr Meghanad Meher et al.
https://africanjournalofbiomedicalresearch.com/index.php/AJBR
Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 27(4s) (December 2024); 10289-10292
Research Article
Relation Of Vitamin D Level With Glycemic Status In Type2
Diabetes Mellitus
Dr Subhash Chandra Dash1, Dr Sourabh Pradhan2, Dr Soumya Ranjan Pradhan3,
Dr Meghanad Meher4*, Dr Sankalp Gupta5
1Professor, department of general medicine, IMS and Sum Hospital Bhubaneswar ,Soa(Deemed to be
university), Odisha. drsubhashdash73@gmail.com
2MD Medicine, Assistant professor, Medicine department, IMS and Sum Hospital Bhubaneswar. SOA
deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. sourabhpradhan@soa.ac.in
3Assistant professor department of general medicine IMS and Sum Hospital Bhubaneswar ,SoaDeemed to be
university, Odisha. drsoumya016@gmail.com
4Assistant professor department of general medicine IMS and sum hospital (SOA Deemed to be university),
Bhubaneswar Odisha India,megha.hrt@gmail.com,9439275371
5Senior Resident, Dept. of Gastroenterology Sr Kalla Memorial Gastroenterology & General Hospital, Jaipur.
drguptasankalp@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Dr Meghanad Meher
*Assistant professor department of general medicine IMS and sum hospital (SOA Deemed to be university),
Bhubaneswar Odisha India,megha.hrt@gmail.com,9439275371
Receive- 01/12/2024 Acceptance -24/12/2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.5653
© 2024 The Author(s).
This article has been published under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International
License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits noncommercial unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium
provided that the following statement is provided. “This article has been published in the African Journal of Biomedical
Research.”
Introduction
Worldwide the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
has increased dramatically in last two decades, from 30
million cases in 1985 to 415 million in 2017.
International Diabetes Federation (IDF) predicts that
642 million people will have DM by the year 2040 (1).
Few studies have demonstrated the inverse relationship
between serum vitamin D level and prevalence of type
2 DM (2), and by supplementing vitamin D the
incidence of DM can be decreased (3).
Vitamin D is mainly produced in the skin by the effect
of sunlight on 7- Dehydrocholesterol (4). Vitamin D
plays a important role not only in musculoskeletal
system, but also in cellular proliferation and
differentiation and immune system modulation (5).
Vitamin D decreases insulin resistance probably by its
effect on calcium and phosphorus metabolism and by
upregulation of insulin receptor gene (6). Different
mechanisms are suggested to associate the role of
Vitamin D with occurrence of DM. Some of these are
location of Vitamin D receptors in the beta cells of
Pancreas, expression of Vitamin D response element in
human insulin gene, improvement of insulin mediated
glucose utilization following Vitamin D therapy, effect
of cytokines like Interleukin 6 and Tumour Necrosis
factor alpha (TNF alpha) in giving rise to insulin
resistance and inhibition of cytokine production by
Vitamin D (7 -10). Serum 25- Hydroxy- Vitamin D,
(25 (OH) D) level is the most specific screening test for
Vitamin D deficiency (11).
Only a few studies are done in India to establish a
relation of Vitamin D level with glycemic status in
Type 2 DM. So this study was picked up.
Relation Of Vitamin D Level With Glycemic Status In Type2 Diabetes Mellitus
10290 Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 27, No.4s (December) 2024 Dr Meghanad Meher et al.
Materials & Methods
This cross-sectional observational study was conducted
in the Department of Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital,
Bhubaneswar over a period of 12 months. Diagnosed
case of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients of more than
18 years of age, attending to the Outpatient Department
of Medicine during January 2023 to December 2023
were included in the study. Patients with liver disease,
renal disease, malignancy, metabolic bone disorders
and patients on vitamin D supplementations,
anticonvulsants or steroids were excluded from the
study. Details of the study was explained to the
participants and written informed consent was obtained
before participation. Thus, a total of 110 subjects were
included in the study.
Detailed history and thorough clinical examination
were done in all patients. Demographic data, all clinical
details and biochemical parameters were recorded in a
structured format. Blood sample was taken in the
morning after overnight fasting. Blood sugar was
measured by hexokinase method. Glycosylated
hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured by high
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.
HbA1c of < 7% was referred to as good glycemic
control (1). Serum 25(OH) D was estimated by electro-
chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) method by
automated analyzer (Cobas e 411).
All the data were analyzed by using statistical package
SPSS, version 20.0. Data were first analyzed for
normal distribution by Kolmogorov- Simrinov test, Q-
Q Plot and Histogram. Numbers and percentages were
used for categorical variables and mean with standard
deviation, median and range for continuous variables.
Based on serum 25(OH)D levels, participants were
grouped into vitamin D sufficiency (vitamin D level of
≥30ng/ml), insufficiency (vitamin D level of 20-
29.9ng/ml) and deficiency (vitamin D level of
<20ng/ml) groups. Chi-Square test for categorical
variables and ANOVA tests for continuous variables
were used for comparison between the groups. Vitamin
D status was also compared between patients with
HbA1c of < 7% and HbA1c of 7%. Chi-Square test
for categorical variables and Independent ‘t’ for
continuous variables were used for comparison
between the two groups. Pearson test was used to
correlate serum vitamin D level with HbA1c levels.
Two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered as
statistically significant.
Results
Mean age of the participants was 59.18 ±11.6 years and
40.9% (n=45) were female. The mean duration of
diabetes in the participants was 7.8 ±4.5 years and
median duration was of 7years. The mean HbA1c was
8.5 ±4.2%. The mean serum vitamin D level was 17.8
±8.5ng/ml. According to the serum 25(OH)D level,
participants were grouped into Vitamin D sufficient
(8.2%, n=9), insufficient (25.5%, n=28) and deficient
(66.4%, n=73) groups. Other characteristics of the
participants are described in Table1.
Demographic characteristics and other parameters were
compared among the vitamin D status groups (table 2).
There was no difference in sex distribution, age, body
mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC)
across the groups (p=0.165, p=0.503, p=0.204 and
p=0.222, respectively). The median duration of
diabetes was not significantly different among the
groups (7 years vs. 7 years vs. 6 years, p=0.078).
However, the mean HbA1c was found significantly
higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency and
insufficiency (8.8 ±2.4% vs. 8.4 ±2.5% vs. 6.3±1.1%,
p=0.011). The mean fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels
were also significantly higher in patients with vitamin
D deficiency and insufficiency (186.4 ± 60.2 vs 166.4±
51.9 vs 132.6 ± 44.1, p=0.018).
Serum vitamin D level was also compared with
glycemic control (HbA1c <7% vs. HbA1c 7%) and
found to have significant difference (p=0.004). Further,
frequencies of vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and
sufficiency were also compared between glycemic
control groups. Among diabetic patients with poor
glycemic control 74.6% (n=59) were having vitamin D
deficiency as compared to 45.1% with good glycemic
status, which was statistically significant (p=0.003)
(Table3). Serum 25(OH)D levels were also correlated
with HbA1c levels but found to have no statistically
significant correlation (r = -0.176, p=0.066).
Table 1. Baseline parameters of study participants (n=110)
Parameters
Mean ± SD
Median (IQR)
% (n)
Age in years
59.18 ±11.6
Female gender
40.9 (45)
BMI in kg/m2
25.3 ±2.8
WC in cm
97.4 ±8.0
SBP in mmHg
138.6 ±17.7
140 (130-150)
DBP in mmHg
82.3 ±8.8
80 (76-90)
Duration of DM in years
7 (5-9)
HbA1C in %
8.5 ±4.2
FBS in mg/dl
176.9 ±58.7
Hypertension
30 (33)
S. Vit.D level ng/ml
17.8 ±8.5
Vit.D deficiency
66.4 (73)
Vit.D insufficiency
25.5 (28)
Vit.D sufficiency
8.2 (9)
Relation Of Vitamin D Level With Glycemic Status In Type2 Diabetes Mellitus
10291 Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 27, No.4s (December) 2024 Dr Meghanad Meher et al.
Table 2. Comparison of demographic and clinical parameters among Vit.D status groups
Characteristics
Vit. D deficiency
(n=73)
Vit.D insufficiency
(n=28)
P value
Female sex % (n)
43.8 (32)
42.8 (12)
0.165
Age in years
59.8±11.6
56.9±12.4
0.503
BMI in kg/m2
25.1±2.7
25.3±3.2
0.204
WC in cm
98.3±8.6
95.4±6.9
0.222
FBS in mg/dl
186.4±60.2
166.4±51.9
0.018
HbA1C
8.8±2.4
8.4±2.5
0.011
Median duration of
DM in years
7
7
0.078
Table 3. Relation of Glycemic status with Vit.D status
Vit.D status
HbA1C <7%
(n=31)
HbA1C ≥7%
(n=79)
P vaue
S. Vit.D level ng/ml (Mean±SD)
21.5±10.9
16.3±7.0
0.004
Vit.D deficiency % (n)
45.1 (14)
74.6 (59)
0.003
Vit.D Insufficiency % (n)
32.2 (10)
22.7 (18)
0.305
Normal Vit.D % (n)
22.5 (7)
2.5 (2)
0.001
Discussion
In our study the mean HbA1c was found significantly
higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency and
insufficiency (8.8 ±2.4% vs. 8.4 ±2.5% vs. 6.3±1.1%,
p=0.011).
In National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES 2003 2006), 9773 adults were
participated. Cross-sectional analysis of the data was
done. It was evident that serum 25(OH) D
concentration was inversely associated with HbA1c
level in 3574 years old individuals (12). Similarly Yu
et al. reported that in T2 DM patients high levels of
HbA1c were independently associated with Vitamin D
deficiency (13). Athanassiou et al also found an inverse
relationship between vitamin D levels and HbA1C. In
T2DM cases, the vitamin D values were observed to be
19.26 +/- 0.95 ng/ml, which were in the Insufficiency
range (14). Anderson et al noticed high prevalence of
DM in persons with severe vitamin D deficiency (15).
Sabherwal et al found a significant decrease in HbA1C
levels in south- Asian T2DM patients after vitamin D
administration, which signifies a role of vitamin D in
glycemic control (16). Nikooyeh et al also noticed
improvement in glycemic control (decrease in HbA1C
level) after administration of vitamin D in T2DM
patients (17).
In our study the mean fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels
were significantly higher in patients with vitamin D
deficiency and insufficiency (186.4±60.2 vs 166.4±
51.9 vs 132.6 ±44.1, p=0.018). A cross-sectional
Finnish study similarly observed inverse correlation
between vitamin D levels and Fasting Insulin, Fasting
Glucose and 2hour glucose tolerance results (18).
Mauss et al also noticed severe vitamin D deficiency
was associated with high Fasting blood sugar and
T2DM (19).
But Yiu et al found no significant change in HbA1C
level after supplementation of Vitamin D in T2DM
patients (20). Kumar A et al also found no significant
association between vitamin D and glycemic control
(21).
The possible mechanisms by which the glycemic status
in diabetic patients could be influenced by vitamin D
include: improvement in insulin sensitivity and beta
cell survival, protection of beta cells against cytokine
induced apoptosis (22), and increased insulin secretion
from beta cells of pancreas (23).
Being a cross-sectional study, our study cannot
establish the cause and effect relationship. Large
intervention trials involving vitamin D supplementation
in T2DM patients are required to provide further
evidence regarding the benefit of vitamin D
supplements in improving the glycemic status.
Conclusion
We conclude that the serum HbA1C level and Fasting
blood sugar level are significantly higher in Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus patients with Vitamin D Deficiency
or Insufficiency, as compared to Type 2 DM patients
with normal vitamin D level.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
1) Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine. 20th
edition.vol 2: 2851
2) Mattila C, Knekt P, Männistö S, Rissanen H,
Laaksonen MA, Montonen J, Reunanen A. Serum
25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and
subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care
2007;30(10):2569-70.
3) Pittas AG, Harris SS, Stark PC, Dawson-Hughes
B. The effect of calcium and vitamin D
supplementation on blood glucose and markers of
inflammation in non-diabetic adults. Diabetes
Care 2007;30:980-86.
4) Ponda MP, Huang X, Odeh MA, Breslow JL,
Kaufman HW. Vitamin D may not improve lipid
levels: a serial clinical laboratory data study.
Circulation 2012; 126:270277.
5) De Luca HF. Overview of general physiologic
features and functions vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr
2004; 80:1689s1696s.
Relation Of Vitamin D Level With Glycemic Status In Type2 Diabetes Mellitus
10292 Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 27, No.4s (December) 2024 Dr Meghanad Meher et al.
6) Athanassiou IK, Athanassiou P, Gkountouvas A,
Kaldrymides P. Vitamin D and glycemic control
in diabetes mellitus type 2. Ther Adv Endocrinol
Metab 2013;4(4):122-28.
7) Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Hughes BD. Vitamin D,
Calcium, and Type 2 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab, 2007; 92:2017-2029.
8) Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL,
Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue
expression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha in
human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Inves,
1995; 95: 2409-2415.
9) Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G,
Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R. Vitamin D
supplementation improves cytokine profiles in
patients with congestive heart failure: a double-
blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J
Clin Nutr, 2006; 83: 749-754.
10) Pittas AG, Bess DH. Vitamin D and Diabetes. J
Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 121: 425-429.
11) Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine. 20th
edition.vol 2: 2920
12) Kositsawat J, Freeman VL, Gerber BS, Geraci S.
Association of A1C levels with Vitamin D status
in U.S. adults: Data from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care
2010;33:12368.
13) Yu JR, Lee SA, Lee JG, Seong GM, Ko SJ, Koh
G, et al. Serum Vitamin D status and its
relationship to metabolic parameters in patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chonnam Med J
2012;48:10815.
14) Athanassiou IK, Athanassiou P, Gkountouvas A,
Kaldrymides P. Vitamin D and glycemic control
in diabetes mellitus type 2. Ther Adv Endocrinol
Metab 2013; 4:122-128.
15) Anderson JL, May HT, Horne BD, Bair TL, Hall
NL, Carlquist JF. Relation of vitamin D
deficiency to cardiovascular risk factors, disease
status, and incident events in a general healthcare
population. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 963-968.
16) Sabherwal S, Bravis V, Devendra D. Effect of
oral vitamin D and calcium replacement on
glycaemic control in South Asian patients with
type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract 2010;64: 1084-
1089.
17) Bahareh N, Tirang RN, Maryamosadat F, Hamid
AM, Anahita H, Ali K. Daily consumption of
vitamin D or vitamin D + calcium fortified yogurt
drink improved glycemic control in patients with
type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J
Clin Nutr 2011; 93:764-771.
18) Hurskainen A-R, Virtanen JK, Tuomainen T-P,
Nurmi T, Voutilainen S. Association of serum 25-
hydroxyvitamin D with type 2 diabetes and
markers of insulin resistance in a general older
population in Finland. Diabetes/Metabolism
Research and Reviews. 2012;28(5):418-23.
19) Mauss D, Jarczok MN, Hoffmann K, Thomas GN,
Fischer JE. Association of Vitamin D Levels with
Type 2 Diabetes in Older Working Adults. Int J
Med Sci 2015; 12: 362-68.
20) Yiu YF, Yiu KH, Siu CW, Chan YH, Li SW,
Wong LY. Randomized controlled trial of vitamin
D supplement on endothelial function in patients
with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 2013; 227:
140-146.
21) Kumar A, Nada SK, Bharathy N, Dinakaran A,
Ray L. Evaluation of vitamin D status and its
correlation with glycated haemoglobin in type 2
diabetes mellitus. Biomedical Research.
2017;28(1):66-70
22) Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The
role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes.
A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92: 2017-29.
23) Zeitz U, Weber K, Soegiarto DW, Wolf E,
Balling R, Erben RG. Impaired insulin secretory
capacity in mice lacking a functional vitamin D
receptor. FASEB J. 2003; 17:509-11.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The role of Vitamin D in various non-skeletal disorders including Diabetes Mellitus has been explored. The role of Vitamin D in peripheral utilization of glucose has been studied. Aim: This study evaluates the correlation between Vitamin D status and Glycated Haemoglobin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Subject and methods: The present study was a retrospective case control study with 78 cases and 69 controls. Mann-Whitney Test was used to study difference in Vitamin D levels between cases and controls. Spearman correlation was used to study the correlation between Vitamin D levels and Glycated Haemoglobin in cases of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Results: The mean Vitamin D values in cases were 16.1 ng/ml and mean Vitamin D values in controls were 17.3 ng/ml. Though the mean values of Vitamin D in cases were lower than that of controls, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.31). Vitamin D insufficiency was observed in both cases and controls. Spearman correlation showed there was no statistically significant correlation between Vitamin D levels and Glycated haemoglobin (p value 0.741) in cases of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Conclusion: Hypovitaminosis D and its correlation with Glycaemic control could not be established.
Article
Full-text available
OBJECTIVES: Increasing evidence suggests that vitamin D plays a role in the development of chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes (DM). Aim of the study was to explore the association of vitamin D levels with prevalent DM in a sample of predominantly healthy working adults older than 45 years. METHODS: This cross-sectional study (2009-2011) involved 1821 employees of a German engineering company (83.1% male, mean age 51.9 ±5.6 years). Sociodemographics and medical history were assessed by self-report. Clinical characteristics were obtained including blood samples to determine vitamin D levels and diabetes status by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Vitamin D was grouped into one of four categories (<10 ng/ml, 10-19.9 ng/ml, 20-29.9 ng/ml, ≥30 ng/ml). Bivariate associations between vitamin D categories and a composite indicator for DM (FPG ≥126 mg/dl or HbA1c ≥6.5% or self-reported diagnosis) were calculated; multivariable models tested this association further, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Severe vitamin D deficiency (<10 ng/ml) was associated with increasing FPG (β 3.13; 95%CI: 0.78, 5.47; p≤0.01) and HbA1c (β 0.15; 95%CI: 0.08, 0.23; p≤0.001) values in adjusted linear regression models. In multivariable models, severe vitamin D deficiency was associated with DM (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.16, 5.62; p≤0.05) after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with prevalent DM in working older adults. The findings highlight that the workplace may be a unique location for conducting large-scale health screening to identify those at risk of DM using vitamin D.
Article
Full-text available
The extraskeletal effects of vitamin D have attracted considerable interest. Vitamin D deficiency appears to be related to the development of diabetes mellitus type 2 and the metabolic syndrome. Vitamin D may affect glucose homeostasis, vitamin D levels having been found to be inversely related to glycosylated hemoglobin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus. In addition, vitamin D appears to protect from the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. The aim was to study levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] and the relationship between 25(OH)D3 levels and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and 25(OH)D3 levels were measured in a group of 120 diabetes mellitus type 2 patients. The same measurements were performed in a group of 120 control subjects of the same age and sex. 25(OH)D3 was measured by radioimmunoassay and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. 25(OH)D3 levels were lower in the diabetes mellitus type 2 patients than in the control group, being 19.26 ± 0.95 ng/ml and 25.49 ± 1.02 ng/ml, in the patient and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001, Student's t-test). 25(OH)D3 levels were found to be inversely associated with HbA1c levels in the diabetic patients (p = 0.008, r (2) = 0.058, linear regression). 25(OH)D3 levels were found to be inversely associated with HbA1c when the patient and control groups were analysed together (p < 0.001, r (2) = 0.086). Vitamin D levels appeared to be lower in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients than in the control group, vitamin D levels being related to glycemic control in diabetes mellitus type 2. These findings may have therapeutic implications as cautious vitamin D supplementation may improve glycemic control in diabetes mellitus type 2.
Article
Full-text available
The potential relationship between vitamin D (VitD) status and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) warrants further study. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level and various parameters in patients with T2DM. We analyzed retrospectively data from 276 Korean patients with T2DM whose serum 25(OH)D level was measured in our hospital. Nondiabetic healthy subjects who visited the hospital for health screening were selected as the control group (Non-DM, n=160). Compared with control subjects, patients with T2DM had a lower serum 25(OH)D level (15.4±0.5 vs. 12.9±0.4 ng/ml, p<0.01). Eleven percent of T2DM patients were VitD "insufficient" (20-29 ng/ml) and 87% of the patients were VitD "deficient" (<20 ng/ml). The serum 25(OH)D level was significantly related to serum fibrinogen, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), ferritin, the urine albumin creatinine ratio, and hemoglobin A(1C) (HbA1C). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, high levels of HbA1C, TG, and LDL-C were independently associated with VitD deficiency in T2DM patients. The results of the present study show that the majority of Koreans with T2DM are VitD deficient, and the serum 25(OH)D level in patients with T2DM is related to lipid and glucose parameters. Further studies are required of the relationship of VitD with fibrinogen and other related parameters.
Article
Background: Suboptimal vitamin D status is associated with endothelial dysfunction and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases but it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. The aim was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomized 100 type 2 DM patients to vitamin D supplement (5000 IU/day, n = 50) or placebo (controls, n = 50) for 12 weeks. Assessment of vascular function with brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), circulating levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and metabolic parameter, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and oxidative stress markers were performed before and after the supplementation. Results: After 12 weeks, vitamin D treated patients had significant increases in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration (treatment effect 34.7 ng/mL, 95% CI 26.4-42.9, P < 0.001) and serum ionized calcium (treatment effect 0.037 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.007-0.067, P = 0.018); decreased serum parathyroid hormone concentration (treatment effect -0.55 pmol/L, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.02, P = 0.042) compared to patients who received placebo. Nevertheless, vitamin D supplementation did not improve vascular function as determined by FMD, circulating EPC count or baPWV (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, hsCRP, oxidative stress markers, low- and high-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin were also similar between two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with type 2 DM, 12 weeks oral supplementation of vitamin D did not significantly affect vascular function or serum biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. Clinical trial number: HKCTR-867, www.hkclinicaltrials.com.
Article
Vitamin D insufficiency and type 2 diabetes are both common in Finland, and low vitamin D status has been suggested as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Our aim was to study the associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], a marker of vitamin D status, and glucose homeostasis and type 2 diabetes in a general population sample in Eastern Finland. Cross-sectional analysis in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. A total of 850 men and 906 women, aged 53-73 years, were analysed. Relative risk (RR) of prevalent diabetes was estimated as odds ratios by logistic regression. Associations between serum 25(OH)D and markers of impaired glucose metabolism in tertiles of serum 25(OH)D concentration were assessed by linear regression. The mean serum 25(OH)D concentration was 43.4 nmol/L (SD 17.6, range 8.5-122.8 nmol/L) in the study population. Serum 25(OH)D concentration <50 nmol/L were observed in 65.5% of the participants. Serum 25(OH)D was inversely associated with fasting serum insulin, fasting blood glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 2-h glucose levels after adjustment for age, gender and examination year. Association with the OGTT 2-h glucose remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustments. The RR (95% confidence interval) for type 2 diabetes in tertiles of serum 25(OH)D were 1, 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) and 1.44 (0.96, 2.15) after multivariate adjustments (p for trend = 0.08). Our results suggest that low serum 25(OH)D is associated with impaired glucose and insulin metabolism.
Article
Altered vitamin D and calcium homeostasis may play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION AND ANALYSES: MEDLINE review was conducted through January 2007 for observational studies and clinical trials in adults with outcomes related to glucose homeostasis. When data were available to combine, meta-analyses were performed, and summary odds ratios (OR) are presented. Observational studies show a relatively consistent association between low vitamin D status, calcium or dairy intake, and prevalent type 2 DM or metabolic syndrome [OR (95% confidence interval): type 2 DM prevalence, 0.36 (0.16-0.80) among nonblacks for highest vs. lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D; metabolic syndrome prevalence, 0.71 (0.57-0.89) for highest vs. lowest dairy intake]. There are also inverse associations with incident type 2 DM or metabolic syndrome [OR (95% confidence interval): type 2 DM incidence, 0.82 (0.72-0.93) for highest vs. lowest combined vitamin D and calcium intake; 0.86 (0.79-0.93) for highest vs. lowest dairy intake]. Evidence from trials with vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation suggests that combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation may have a role in the prevention of type 2 DM only in populations at high risk (i.e. glucose intolerance). The available evidence is limited because most observational studies are cross-sectional and did not adjust for important confounders, whereas intervention studies were short in duration, included few subjects, used a variety of formulations of vitamin D and calcium, or did post hoc analyses. Vitamin D and calcium insufficiency may negatively influence glycemia, whereas combined supplementation with both nutrients may be beneficial in optimizing glucose metabolism.
Article
Low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] have been associated with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes. This study aimed to compare the effects of daily intake of vitamin D- or vitamin D(3) + calcium-fortified yogurt drink on glycemic status in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Ninety diabetic subjects were randomly allocated to 3 groups to consume plain yogurt drink (PY; containing no vitamin D and 150 mg Ca/250 mL), vitamin D-fortified yogurt drink (DY; containing 500 IU vitamin D(3) and 150 mg Ca/250 mL), or vitamin D + calcium-fortified yogurt drink (DCY; containing 500 IU vitamin D(3) and 250 mg Ca/250 mL) twice per day for 12 wk. Fasting serum glucose (FSG), glycated hemoglobin (Hb A(1c)), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum lipid profile, and percentage fat mass (FM) were assessed before (baseline) and after the intervention. In both the DY and DCY groups, mean serum 25(OH)D(3) improved (+32.8 ± 28.4 and +28.8 ± 16.1 nmol/L, respectively; P < 0.001 for both), but FSG [-12.9 ± 33.7 mg/dL (P = 0.015) and -9.6 ± 46.9 mg/dL (P = 0.035)], Hb A(1c) [-0.4 ± 1.2% (P < 0.001) and -0.4 ± 1.9% (P < 0.001)], HOMA-IR [-0.6 ± 1.4 (P = 0.001) and -0.6 ± 3.2 (P < 0.001)], waist circumference (-3.6 ± 2.7 and -2.9 ± 3.3; P < 0.001 for both), and body mass index [in kg/m(2); -0.9 ± 0.6 (P < 0.001) and -0.4 ± 0.7 (P = 0.005)] decreased significantly more than in the PY group. An inverse correlation was observed between changes in serum 25(OH)D(3) and FSG (r = -0.208, P = 0.049), FM (r = -0.219, P = 0.038), and HOMA-IR (r = -0.219, P = 0.005). Daily intake of a vitamin D-fortified yogurt drink, either with or without added calcium, improved glycemic status in T2D patients. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01229891.
Article
Vitamin D recently has been proposed to play an important role in a broad range of organ functions, including cardiovascular (CV) health; however, the CV evidence-base is limited. We prospectively analyzed a large electronic medical records database to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and the relation of vitamin D levels to prevalent and incident CV risk factors and diseases, including mortality. The database contained 41,504 patient records with at least one measured vitamin D level. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (≤30 ng/ml) was 63.6%, with only minor differences by gender or age. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with highly significant (p <0.0001) increases in the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and peripheral vascular disease. Also, those without risk factors but with severe deficiency had an increased likelihood of developing diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The vitamin D levels were also highly associated with coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke (all p <0.0001), as well as with incident death, heart failure, coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction (all p <0.0001), stroke (p = 0.003), and their composite (p <0.0001). In conclusion, we have confirmed a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general healthcare population and an association between vitamin D levels and prevalent and incident CV risk factors and outcomes. These observations lend strong support to the hypothesis that vitamin D might play a primary role in CV risk factors and disease. Given the ease of vitamin D measurement and replacement, prospective studies of vitamin D supplementation to prevent and treat CV disease are urgently needed.
Article
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Studies looking at the effect of vitamin D replacement on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetics are few and conflicting. In addition, none have been published looking at the South Asian population despite both T2DM and vitamin D deficiency being gross burdens in this population. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of using vitamin D and calcium replacement therapy on glycaemic control in South Asian patients with T2DM and vitamin D inadequacy. Data were collected retrospectively from patients' records focusing on South Asians with established T2DM treated with combined oral vitamin D(3) and calcium supplementation. Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), HbA1c and weight were recorded before and after 3 months on this therapy. Post-treatment, all patients' (n = 52) vitamin D levels were normalised (> 50nmol/l). There was a mean decrease in HbA1c of 0.70 +/- 0.77% (p < 0.001) in the vitamin D deficient group (n = 29) and 0.21 +/- 0.28% (p = 0.001) in the vitamin D insufficient group (n = 23). The change in weight post-treatment was only significant in the vitamin D deficient group at -0.80 +/- 1.11 kg (p = 0.001). Overall, there were negative correlations between the changes in HbA1c and weight with the change in vitamin D (p < 0.05). This study shows that vitamin D and calcium replacement therapy in South Asian patients with T2DM causes a significant decrease in both HbA1c and weight, which may be attributed to the increase in vitamin D levels post-treatment.