ArticlePDF Available

Castleman disease: A single-center case series in Nepal Mediciti Hospital

Authors:

Abstract

BACKGROUND In 1954, Castleman Disease (CD), was first described and is also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia or giant lymph node hyperplasia . Among many sites where lesion occurs, commonest is in the thorax (60%), abdomen (11%), neck (14%), and axilla (4%) MATERIALS AND METHOD We analyzed five cases of Castleman disease we received in Nepal Mediciti during five-year period from 2020 to 2024. Demographics, clinical variables, anatomical site, centricity, histopathology, immunochemistry, and surgical approach were reviewed. RESULTS Among five cases, anatomical location of two cases from retroperitoneum, two from inguinal region and one is from cervical lymph node. Three cases were male and two were female. Age group of these five cases shows three were adult and two were children. All of them underwent surgical resection and under continuous follow up. One of the cases from retroperitoneum had got recurrence. CONCLUSION Castleman disease is a diagnosis of exclusion. Case should be evaluated on the basis of proper clinical findings, blood parameters, HIV and HHV-8 test, imaging along with biopsy and IHC. Lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma may mimic on radiology and histologically with Castleman disease.
71 NMMJ | Volume 5 | Number 2 | July-December 2024
Nepal Mediciti Medical JournalNepal Mediciti Medical Journal
Acharya Shoshan1*, Aryal Gopi2 Basnet Sunila3 Rana Reena4, Pandey Kricha5, Thakur Nikki6
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology
Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Bhaisepati, Lalitpur, Nepal
Castleman disease: A single-center case series in
Nepal Mediciti Hospital
BACKGROUND
In 1954, Castleman Disease (CD), was rst described and is also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia or giant
lymph node hyperplasia . Among many sites where lesion occurs, commonest is in the thorax (60%), abdomen (11%), neck
(14%), and axilla (4%)
MATERIALS AND METHOD
We analyzed ve cases of Castleman disease we received in Nepal Mediciti during ve-year period from 2020 to 2024.
Demographics, clinical variables, anatomical site, centricity, histopathology, immunochemistry, and surgical approach were
reviewed.
RESULTS
Among ve cases, anatomical location of two cases from retroperitoneum, two from inguinal region and one is from cervical
lymph node. Three cases were male and two were female. Age group of these ve cases shows three were adult and two were
children. All of them underwent surgical resection and under continuous follow up. One of the cases from retroperitoneum had
got recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Castleman disease is a diagnosis of exclusion. Case should be evaluated on the basis of proper clinical ndings, blood
parameters, HIV and HHV-8 test, imaging along with biopsy and IHC. Lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma may mimic on radiology
and histologically with Castleman disease.
KEYWORDS
Unicentric Castleman disease, Hyaline vascular, Lymphoma
ABSTRACT
*Corresponding Author |
Dr. Shoshan Raj acharya
Email: acharyashoshan6@gmail.com
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology,
Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Sainbu, Lalitpur, Nepal
This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Case Report
72
NMMJ | Volume 5 | Number 2 | July-December 2024
Castleman disease: A single-center case series | Case Report
INTRODUCTION
In 1954 , Castleman Disease (CD), was rst described and
is also known as Angio follicular lymph node hyperplasia or
giant lymph node hyperplasia1. Among many sites where
lesion occurs, commonest is in the thorax (60%), abdomen
(11%), neck (14%), and axilla (4%).2 Pathologically it can be
classied as hyaline vascular type (HV-CD), plasma cell type,
mixed type, and human herpes virus (HHV)-8 associated
Castleman disease.3 Surgery is the primary treatment and
has good long-term prognosis. Multicentric Castleman
Disease (MCCD) is a more serious systemic condition, often
associated with constitutional symptoms. Exaggerated
systemic inflammatory response secondary to “Cytokine
storm” involving Interleukin-6 (IL-6) may cause multi-organ
dysfunction4. Most important the histopathological features
encountered in the various forms of Castleman disease are
diverse, and for the most part, lack specicity, because they
are seen to varying degrees in different clinical variants of
Castleman disease, and in reactive (autoimmune/infectious)
and malignant (lymphoma) contexts.5 POEMS syndrome is a
paraneoplastic syndrome. The important features, other than
those in its previously listed acronym, include papilledema,
extravascular volume overload, sclerotic bone lesions,
thrombocytosis, elevated vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF), and abnormal pulmonary function. TAFRO syndrome
is an acute or subacute systemic inflammatory disorder
characterized by the conditions previously listed in the
acronym. Of note, the anasarca includes pleural effusion and
ascites and the organomegaly includes hepatosplenomegaly
and lymphadenopathy.6
After literature review, we analyzed all reported cases
of association CD-NHL and CD-HD. NHL is more often
associated with multicentric CD, its diagnosis being
concurrent with CD diagnosis or occurring within 2 years.
B-NHL is predominant (71%), and mantle cell lymphoma
represents 40% of these B-NHL cases.7 Incidence of CD
based of anatomical location sites based on literature
review. Table (1.1)(8). Surgical removal of a unicentric mass
of hyaline-vascular or hyaline-vascular/plasma cell type
is curative. Partial resection, radiotherapy, or observation
alone may avoid the need for excessively aggressive therapy.
Patients with multicentric disease, either hyaline-vascular or
plasma cell type, do not benet from surgical management
and should be candidates for multimodality therapy. 8
In one study, the incidence of Kaposi's-sarcoma- associated,
HHV 8-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a cohort of HIV-
positive patients with multicentric Castleman’s disease was
15-fold higher than the incidence in the general HIV-positive
population. 9
Collectively, we were involved in the diagnosis of 5 patients
with Castleman's disease. Among ve patients three were
treated in Nepal Mediciti Hospital and two were treated in
another center. All 5 patients had the localized form and the
hyaline-vascular type of Castleman's disease as determined
by surgical lymph node biopsy. Follow-ups were conducted by
telephone calls. In this article, we describe these 5 cases, and
we review the entire course of Castleman's disease, including
its clinical features at presentation, its histopathological
characteristics, and the diagnostic and treatment challenges
it poses.
CASE REPORTS
Patient 1
A 46-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of a
persistent, enlarging left lateral neck mass. The patient also
complained of right-sided neck numbness and tingling. The
remainder of her medical history was unremarkable. On
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the mass measured 4.2
x 2.2 cm. Fine-needle aspiration cytology was not done. Core
biopsy was performed which shows lymphoid follicles with
interspersed sclerotic vessels. IHC ndings were negative
for diagnosis of lymphoma. The patient was referred to the
surgery department and excision biopsy was performed.
Patient 2
A 53-year-old male presented with enlarged lymph node in
cervical region for one month associated with pain. CT-Scan
shows homogeneously enhancing and necrotic lymph node
with septal thickening and ground glass opacities. Excision
biopsy was received which shows greyish brown lobulated
surface. On Microscopic examination shows follicular
architecture of lymphoid architecture is replaced by diffuse
proliferation of lymphoid cells, with concentric arrangement
of dilated vessels with interspersed plasma cells. Differential
diagnosis of lymphoproliferative neoplasm and Castleman
disease was made. IHC ndings ruled out lymphoproliferative
neoplasm.
Patient 3
A 13-year-old male with asymptomatic heterogeneous
mass in mesentery in right iliac fossa with minimal internal
vascularity. USG features suggestive of conglomerate
lymph node with differential diagnosis of lymphoma
and tuberculosis. Core biopsy performed from mass
microscopically shows diffuse sheets of plasma cells along
Table 1.1 Incidence of Castleman disease by location
Location Percentage of cases
Thorax 60
Neck 14
Abdomen 11
Axilla 04
Other 11
73 NMMJ | Volume 5 | Number 2 | July-December 2024
with thick-walled blood vessels with areas of hemorrhage
and brosis. Diagnosis was conformed as plasma cell variant
of Castleman disease by IHC.
Patient 4
A 74-year female with previously biopsy proven case of
Castleman disease presented with enlarged lymph node
in hypogastrium and multiple skin lesions. USG-features
suggestive of recurrence of Castleman disease with
differential of conversion to lymphoma. On microscopic
examination there is diffuse component of polymorphous
population of lymphoid cells coursed by conspicuous
vascular proliferation with hyalinized wall and prominent
endothelial vessels. Plasma cells are noted but not in sheets.
Final diagnosis of hyalinized vascular type Castleman
disease was made on H and E examination
Patient 5
A 24-year old female with left retroperitoneal mass. CECT-
features suggestive of extra- adrenal pheochromocytoma.
Excision biopsy microscopically shows lymphoid follicles
with thickened mantle zone. Sclerotic arterioles penetrate
most of the thyroid follicles. Nodular inltrate of lymphocytes
surrounded by broad band of collagen is seen at places.
Scattered large cells with vesicular nuclei were also identied.
Microscopic differentials were Castleman lymphadenopathy,
diffuse large cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma
S.N. Age Sex Diagnosis
146 Female Unicentric Castleman disease
253 Male Unicentric Castleman disease
313 Male Unicentric Castleman disease
474 Female Unicentric Castleman disease
524 Female Unicentric Castleman disease
Fig 1. CECT shows enhancing soft tissue density mass
Fig 2. Gross picture showing well circumscribed light grey
soft to rm mass
Fig 3. Microscopic image showing onion skin pattern, sclerotic
vessels entering into germinal center of lymphoid follicle
Fig 4. Microscopic image showing sclerotic vessels with
increased vascularity in lymphoid follicles
Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal
74
NMMJ | Volume 5 | Number 2 | July-December 2024
DISCUSSION
1. Etiology
Conditions that result in Castleman disease is associated with
chronic low-grade inflammation, lymphoid-hamartomata’s
hyperplasia, viral infections, abnormal modulation of
cytokines, and angiogenesis. HIV and human herpes
virus (HHV)-8 has also been associated with multicentric
Castleman disease. Advances in diagnosis, classication,
pathogenesis, and therapy are substantial since the original
description of UCD by Benjamin Castleman in 1954.10
2. Pathogenesis
Overexpression of Interleukin (IL)-6 and some epidermal
growth factor receptor is seen on signaling pathways involved
in patient with UCD. FDCs (Follicular dendritic cells role in
lymphocyte trafcking is largely mediated through secretion
of chemokine ligand 13 also known as B lymphocytic
chemoattractant .11
3. Diagnosis
Castleman's disease can pose several diagnostic dilemmas.
Most often it manifests as an asymptomatic, unifocal, soft-
tissue mass without any trademark signs or symptoms.
4. Imaging test
X-ray, CT, MRI, PET scan can allow health care provider to
locate the enlarged lymph node. 12 Vascularity within the
lymphoid follicles can be studied by the imaging technique.
Denite diagnosis of Castleman is always not possible but
differentials can be listed out. In our cases also imaging
technique have listed differentials of paraganglioma and
lymphoma as differentials.
5. Blood parameters
Castleman disease is mostly presented with low red blood
cell count. Thrombocytosis or thrombocytopenia. HHV-8,
test and HIV test must be performed to rule out multicentric
Castleman disease (MCD). We have ruled out MCD in our all
cases.13
6. FNAC
FNAC have been very low helpful in case of diagnosis of
Castleman disease. Differentials of reactive lymphadenopathy
and lymphoma could only be made as in FNAC we see
lymphoid population only. In our cases we have made
reactive lymphadenopathy as diagnosis in cases where we
have performed FNAC.
7. Biopsy
Biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of Castleman
disease. Hyperplastic lymphoid follicle with sclerotic blood
vessels entering into germinal center along with twinning
of germinal center is most common histological nding we
have encountered in our cases. IHC markers along with HHV-
8, and HIV test is co- performed to rule out lymphoma and
multicentric Castleman disease, which we have performed in
our cases.
8. Treatment
Corticosteroids, low dose chemotherapy oral etoposide,
cyclophosphamide has been used in most cases. Recent
development of monoclonal antibodies is also been widely
used now. Surgical excision remains the gold standard
followed by chemotherapy.14 MCD and recurrent cases of
UCD should be in close follow up as there is always risk of
conversion into lymphoma.
CONCLUSION
Among ve cases we received, three were female and two
were male. Two among ve were of younger age children. All
of them were diagnosed as UC Castleman disease. So, we
can conclude that Castleman disease can occur in any age,
irrespective of gender and is most common type is UC type.
Castleman disease is a diagnosis of exclusion. Case should
be evaluated on the basis of proper clinical ndings, blood
parameters, HIV and HHV-8 test, imaging along with biopsy
and IHC. Lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma may mimic
on radiology and histologically with Castleman disease.
Diagnosis of Castleman disease is insufcient we should
separate into HV and PC (HHV8- or HHV-8 +) as they have
different prognosis. We should perform HHV8 IHC on all
cases with plasma cell CD, HHV-8 – (differentiate with
autoimmune disease, IG4 related disease). HHV8+ should be
carefully evaluated for KS and Lymphoma.
Castleman disease: A single-center case series | Case Report
75 NMMJ | Volume 5 | Number 2 | July-December 2024
REFERENCE
1.
Pribyl K, Vakayil V, Farooqi N, Arora N, Kreitz B, Ikramuddin
S, et al. Castleman disease: A single-center case series. Int
J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Feb 14;80:105650.
2. Anagnostou D, Harrison CV. Angiofollicular lymph
node hyperplasia (Castleman). J Clin Pathol. 1972
Apr;25(4):306–11.
3. Ehsan N, Zahra F. Castleman Disease. In: StatPearls
[Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024
Jan- Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK576394/
4. C.G. RR, B. S. Castleman disease: Case series of two
surgical patients from different ends of the disease
spectrum with literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018
Oct 29;53:163–7.
5. Wu D, Lim MS, Jaffe ES. Pathology of Castleman Disease.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2018 Feb;32(1):37–52.
6. Simpson D. Epidemiology of Castleman Disease.
Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 2018 Feb
1;32(1):1–10.
7. Larroche C, Cacoub P, Soulier J, Oksenhendler E, Clauvel
JP, Piette JC, et al. Castleman’s disease and lymphoma:
report of eight cases in HIV-negative patients and literature
review. Am J Hematol. 2002 Feb;69(2):119–26.
8.
Bowne WB, Lewis JJ, Filippa DA, Niesvizky R, Brooks
AD, Burt ME, et al. The management of unicentric and
multicentric Castleman’s disease: a report of 16 cases and
a review of the literature. Cancer. 1999 Feb 1;85(3):706–17.
9. Newlon JL, Couch M, Brennan J. Castleman’s Disease:
Three Case Reports and a Review of the Literature. Ear
Nose Throat J. 2007 Jul 1;86(7):414–8.
10. Dispenzieri A, Fajgenbaum DC. Overview of Castleman
disease. Blood. 2020 Apr 16;135(16):1353–64.
11. Fajgenbaum DC, Shilling D. Castleman Disease
Pathogenesis. Hematology/Oncology Clinics. 2018 Feb
1;32(1):11–21.
12 F. Din, F. Mellor, T. Millard et,al , Radiology of Castleman
disease: the pivotal role of imaging in diagnosis, staging,
and response assessment of this rare entity, Clinical
Radiology, Volume 77, Issue 6, 2022, Pages 399-408,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2022.01.045
13. Takai KA, Nikkuni KO, Shibuya HI, Hashidate HI.
Thrombocytopenia with mild bone marrow brosis
accompanied by fever, pleural effusion, ascites and
hepatosplenomegaly. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese
journal of clinical hematology. 2010 May 1;51(5):320-5.
14. Robinson D Jr, Reynolds M, Casper C, et al. Clinical
epidemiology and treatment patterns of patients with
multicentric Castleman disease: results from two US
treatment centres. Br J Haematol. 2014;165(1):39-48.
doi:10.1111/bjh.12717
Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphocytic disorder. Unicentric CD (UCD) has an excellent long-term prognosis after surgical excision; however, multicentric CD (MCD) has a severe clinical course with poor outcomes. Study design We analyzed the clinical presentation of 28 patients treated at a single institution from 1995 to 2017. Demographics, clinical variables, anatomical site, centricity, histopathology, immunochemistry, and surgical approach were reviewed. We evaluated the 5-year recurrence and survival for patients with UCD and MCD. Results Of the 28 patients, 57% (n = 16) were female, with a mean age of 41.6 ± 15.6 years. CD was asymptomatic in 57% (n = 16) of patients, 21% (n = 6) presented with local symptoms such as pain, and 21% (n = 6) of patients also had systemic symptoms, including weight loss and fever. CD was unicentric in 64% (n = 18) and multicentric in 36% (n = 10). The hyaline vascular variant was noted in 57% (n = 16) of the tumors, plasmacytoid variant in 36% (n = 10), and mixed variants in 7% (n = 2) of tumors. Anatomical distributions included: head and neck (20%), thorax and axilla (24%), retroperitoneal (13%), abdominopelvic (30%) regions, and other (13%). Complete surgical resection was performed in 95% of patients with UCD. Surgical biopsy and medical therapy were provided to all patients with MCD. The recurrence rate for UCD and MCD was 6% (n = 1) and 14% (n = 1), respectively. The five-year disease-free survival rate for UCD was 95% (n = 19) and MCD was 33% (n = 2). We found 100% survival in patients with UCD and histology demonstrating the HV variant. Conclusion CD is rare and often misdiagnosed due to the absence of specific clinical symptoms. Surgeons should include CD in their differential diagnoses when evaluating patients with lymph node hyperplasia. Surgery can be curative in nearly all patients with UCD. Patients with MCD require a combination of surgical therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy; however, cytoreductive surgery benefits for patients with MCD have not been established.
Article
Castleman Disease (CD) is a rare entity that typically presents as an enhancing nodal mass in the mediastinum or head and neck region on computed tomography (CT). It may manifest as unicentric or multicentric regions of lymph node enlargement. A key clinical issue in the context of CD is delayed diagnosis, which contributes adversely to patient outcome, given that accurate diagnosis facilitates earlier treatment of this curable disease. This article will address relevant imaging aspects, with reference to typical and atypical imaging features of CD, illustrated using examples from our specialist centre; the imaging journey for patients with CD; and will provide practical pointers to radiologists in differentiating CD from other benign and malignant causes of enhancing lymphadenopathy, including lymphoma and neoplastic adenopathy. We will also review current classification tools and staging challenges with reference to World Health Organization guidelines, International Working Group guidelines as well as the Lugano classification. Finally, we will discuss the potential role of additional imaging techniques in CD, highlighting novel imaging methods and expanded utilities from our specialist centre.
Article
Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of at least four disorders that share a spectrum of characteristic histopathological features but have a wide range of etiologies, presentations, treatments, and outcomes. CD includes unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD), the latter of which is divided into idiopathic MCD (iMCD), HHV8-associated MCD (HHV8-MCD), and POEMS-associated MCD. iMCD can be further sub-classified into iMCD-TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, ascites, reticulin fibrosis, renal dysfunction, organomegaly) or iMCD-NOS (not otherwise specified), who often have thrombocytosis and hypergammaglobulinemia. Advances in diagnosis, classification, pathogenesis, and therapy are substantial since the original description of UCD by Benjamin Castleman in 1954. The advent of effective retroviral therapy and use of rituximab in HHV8-MCD have improved outcomes in HHV8-MCD. Anti-interleukin-6 directed therapies are highly effective in many iMCD patients, but additional therapies are required for refractory cases. Much of the recent progress has been coordinated by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN), and further progress will be made by continued engagement of physicians, scientists, and patients, the last of which can be facilitated by encouraging patients to self-enroll in the CDCN's ACCELERATE natural history registry (#NCT02817997, www.CDCN.org/ACCELERATE).
Article
Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous disorders with common lymph node histopathologic features, including atrophic or hyperplastic germinal centers, prominent follicular dendritic cells, hypervascularization, polyclonal lymphoproliferation, and/or polytypic plasmacytosis. The cause and pathogenesis of the four subtypes of CD (unicentric CD; human herpesvirus-8-associated multicentric CD; polyradiculoneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal plasma cell disorder, and skin changes [POEMS]-associated multicentric CD; and idiopathic multicentric CD) vary considerably. This article provides a summary of our current understanding of the cause, cell types, signaling pathways, and effector cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of each subtype.
Article
The term Castleman disease encompasses several distinct lymphoproliferative disorders with different underlying disease pathogenesis, and clinical outcomes. It includes unicentric and multicentric diseases with limited versus significant systemic symptoms, respectively. Importantly, the histopathologic features encountered in the various forms of Castleman disease are diverse, and for the most part, lack specificity, because they are seen to varying degrees in different clinical variants of Castleman disease, and in reactive (autoimmune/infectious) and malignant (lymphoma) contexts. Accordingly, accurate clinical diagnosis of Castleman disease requires careful and thorough clinicopathologic correlation. An overview of the key histopathologic features of Castleman disease is presented.
Article
Castleman disease is a rare entity, including unicentric Castleman disease (UCD), human herpesvirus-8 plus Castleman disease (HHV-8+MCD), and idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD). UCD is the most common at 16 per million person years and occurs at every age. HHV-8+MCD incidence varies widely, mostly affecting human immunodeficiency virus–positive men. iMCD is likely a more heterogeneous disease with an estimated incidence of 5 per million person years. Improved definitions should improve understanding of the epidemiology of Castleman disease and its subtypes.
Article
Multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease with little known about its epidemiology or treatment modalities. Clinical and demographic data of MCD patients identified between 2000 and 2009 were collected from medical records at two United States (US) MCD referral centres. ZIP codes identified patient residences; prevalence and incidence were estimated based on catchment areas. Patient clinical, demographic, and biochemical characteristics, drug therapies and medical utilization were descriptively reported. MCD patients (n = 59) were 61% male, mean age of 53 years (median = 55 years) and 68% Caucasian. Of those with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status (n = 41), 85% (n = 35) were negative, 15% (n = 6) were positive. Most frequent physician-reported symptoms (n = 33) were fatigue (49%, n = 16), fever (39%, n = 13), and night sweats (30%, n = 10). The estimated US 10-year prevalence was 2·4 per million. During first year of follow-up after study entry, the top two systemic therapies (n = 27) were monotherapies: prednisone (33%, n = 9) and rituximab (19%, n = 5). After a follow-up of 2 years, 92% of patients were alive. This study provides new information on MCD population demographics, treatment patterns, and medical utilization; a minimal US period prevalence rate is proposed. Study replication is needed to improve external validity.
Article
We report three patients who presented with high fever, anasarca, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and severe thrombocytopenia accompanied by reticulin fibrosis of the bone marrow. This constellation of symptoms is not compatible with any known disease entity, and we had difficulty in diagnosis and treatment. A 47-year-old woman was suspected of having splenic lymphoma and received one course of CHOP regimen followed by continued steroid therapy. Her condition was improved but repeatedly became exacerbated with tapering of steroid. A 56-year-old man was treated with steroid pulse therapy and splenectomy without improvement. Histology of the liver and spleen did not show any specific findings. Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin A was successful. Another 49-year-old man showed histological findings of paracortical hyperplasia with vascular proliferation and atrophic germinal centers on inguinal lymph node biopsy. These findings were similar to those of the hyaline-vascular type of Castleman disease or POEMS syndrome, but non-specific. Although he received steroid pulse therapy, he died of multiple organ failure. Autopsy demonstrated cytomegalovirus infection and hemophagocytic histiocytosis without malignant lymphoma. We suggest that this constellation represents a new clinical entity belonging to systemic inflammatory disorders with a background of immunological abnormality, requiring prompt and vigorous immunosuppressive therapy.
Article
Six personally observed cases of this lesion are reported and the literature is reviewed. One hundred and thirty-four cases have been reported to date. The lesion has occurred in many sites, but is commonest in the thorax (60%), abdomen (11%), neck (14%), and axilla (4%). Ninety per cent of cases are symptomless or have only the pressure symptoms, 10% have systemic signs, namely, fever, raised ESR, anaemia, cured by removal of the tumour. These cases have a slightly different histology. All recorded cases have been benign. Microscopically the lesion is follicular but instead of germinal centres the follicles have one or more thick-walled arteries and often some surrounding histiocytes. Increased numbers of vessels occur between the follicles, whilst sinuses are absent. These vessels have thick, cellular walls like post-capillary venules. Sometimes they become hyaline. The cases with symptoms have true reaction centres as well as a few intrafollicular vessels. Between the follicles there are increased numbers of vessels and, in addition, there may be collections of plasma cells or eosinophils.
Article
Castleman's disease (CD), or angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia, creates both diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for most physicians. For patients with this rare and poorly understood disease, the optimal therapy is unknown. The authors report their experience during the years 1986-1997 with this uncommon clinicopathologic entity. Sixteen patients with a histologic diagnosis of CD were identified in the pathology database. Unicentric disease was defined as a solitary mass. Multicentric disease compromised patients with widespread lymphadenectomy. Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data were analyzed to evaluate treatment response. The study group consisted of 16 patients classified into 3 clinicopathologic groups: hyaline-vascular, plasma cell, and "mixed." Of those patients who underwent complete surgical excision of a unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass (n = 8), all remain symptom free without clinical or radiographic recurrence. Two patients remain asymptomatic following partial resection or radiation therapy for an unresectable unicentric hyaline-vascular CD mass. Two patients with multicentric hyaline-vascular CD are currently in complete remission following adjuvant therapy. Multicentric plasma cell CD was present in a single patient. This patient (who underwent surgical and systemic therapy) died of disease within 4 months of presentation. Three patients with unicentric hyaline-vascular/plasma cell-CD remain symptom free following either complete resection or observation. The authors recommend surgical resection for patients with the unicentric variant of CD. Surgical removal of a unicentric mass of hyaline-vascular or hyaline-vascular/plasma cell type is curative. Partial resection, radiotherapy, or observation alone may avoid the need for excessively aggressive therapy. Patients with multicentric disease, either hyaline-vascular or plasma cell type, do not benefit from surgical management and should be candidates for multimodality therapy, the nature of which has yet to be defined.