ArticlePDF Available

Nuculidae (Bivalvia) from King George Island (South Shetland Islands) with the description of a new species of Ennucula. - Iberus 43(1): 83-92

Authors:

Abstract

During the 31 st Soviet Antarctic Expedition in 1986/87, two species of nuculids have been found in Ardley Cove, a bay on King George Island, one of which is new to science and is described herein: Ennucula ardleyana n. sp. This species was found at two stations alive as single individuals in the intertidal zone and in a water depth of 100 meters. Nucula falk-landica Preston, 1912, the second species, is already known from this area. It was found at six stations with soft bottom and coarse sediment in water depths between 35 and 90 metres in Ardley Cove and Fildes Strait (between King George Island and Nelson Island).
Nuculidae (Bivalvia) from King George Island (South
Shetland Islands) with the description of a new species of
Ennucula
Nuculidae (Bivalvia) de la Isla Rey Jorge (Islas Shetland del Sur) con
la descripción de una nueva especie de Ennucula
Michael L. ZETTLER1& Andreas BICK2
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:956D2D4E-ADE5-4829-BE50-264C58F3CFC4
Recibido el 30-IX-2024. Aceptado el 18-XI-2024
ABSTRACT
During the 31st Soviet Antarctic Expedition in 1986/87, two species of nuculids have been
found in Ardley Cove, a bay on King George Island, one of which is new to science and is
described herein: Ennucula ardleyana n. sp. This species was found at two stations alive as
single individuals in the intertidal zone and in a water depth of 100 meters. Nucula falk-
landica Preston, 1912, the second species, is already known from this area. It was found at
six stations with soft bottom and coarse sediment in water depths between 35 and 90
metres in Ardley Cove and Fildes Strait (between King George Island and Nelson Island).
RESUMEN
Durante la 31ª Expedición Antártica Soviética en 1986/87, se encontraron dos especies de
nucúlidos en Ardley Cove, una bahía de la isla Rey Jorge, una de las cuales se describe como
nueva para la ciencia: Ennucula ardleyana n. sp. Esta especie se encontró viva en dos esta-
ciones como individuos aislados en la zona intermareal y a una profundidad de 100 metros.
Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912, la segunda especie, ya se conoce en esta zona. Se encon-
tró en seis estaciones con fondo blando y sedimento grueso en profundidades de entre 35 y
90 metros en Ardley Cove y el estrecho de Fildes (entre la Isla Rey Jorge y la Isla Nelson).
KEY WORDS: Mollusca, Southern Ocean, Antarctica, King George Island.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Mollusca, Océano Austral, Antártida, Isla Rey Jorge.
INTRODUCTION
Species of Nuculidae Gray, 1824
(Bivalvia: Protobranchia) live in all
oceans of the world from intertidal to
abyssal zones, mostly in silty mud
(H
UBER
2010). Presently, about 170 valid
recent species in 11 genera are known
1Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Warnemünde, Germany, michael.zettler@io-warnemuen-
de.de. Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-5495
2Universität Rostock, Institut für Biowissenschaften, Allgemeine & Spezielle Zoologie, Universitätsplatz 2, D-
18055 Rostock, Germany; bick-andreas@t-online.de. Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-6106
© Sociedad Española de Malacología Iberus, 43 (1): 83-92, 2025
83
(M
OLLUSCA
B
ASE EDS
. 2024). The genus
Nucula Lamarck, 1799 contains 86 recent
species (slightly more than 50 % of all
species of this genus) accepted as valid
(M
OLLUSCA
B
ASE EDS
. 2024). With 48
species, the genus Ennucula Iredale,
1931 also makes a significant contribu-
tion to the total number of species.
South of the Polar Front, only repre-
sentatives of the genera Nucula, Pronocula
and Ennucula are known in recent times
(W
HITTLE E T AL
. 2012). The record of
nuculid species in Antarctic waters is rel-
atively rare (P
OWELL
1965; D
ELL
1972;
L
INSE ETAL
. 2006). In particular, the scarcity
or absence of nuculid species in otherwise
quite extensive studies on the Antarctic
molluscs indicates their relative rarity
(N
ICOL
1966; E
GOROVA
1982, 1984; A
RNAUD
ET AL
. 1986; M
ÜHLENHARDT
-S
IEGEL
1989;
H
AIN
1990; A
BSHER
& F
EIJÓ
1998; N
ARCHI
ET AL
. 2002; A
LDEA
& T
RONCOSO
2008;
G
ORDILLO ET AL
. 2017; O
SORNO
-A
RANGO
& C
ANTERA
-K
INTZ
2021).
In contrast to the two abyssal species
Nucula austrobenthalis Dell, 1990 and
Pronucula notobenthalis (Thiele, 1912),
only Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912 is a
relatively common species, especially in
the Malvinas/Falkland Islands, South
Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands
and Antarctic Peninsula (E
NGL
2012).
Other nuculid species do not reach the
Antarctic and are restricted to the more
distant peripheral regions such as the
Strait of Magellan, the Malvinas/Falk-
land Islands, South Georgia or the Ker-
guelen Islands, such as Nucula kerguelen-
sis Thiele, 1912, Nucula pisum G. B.
Sowerby I, 1833, Ennucula puelcha (A.
d’Orbigny, 1842), Ennucula grayi (A.
d’Orbigny, 1846), Ennucula eltanini Dell,
1990 or Ennucula georgiana Dell, 1964
(see T
HIELE
1912; D
ELL
1964, 1990; L
INSE
1999; V
ILLARROEL
& S
TUARDO
1998; F
OR
-
CELLI
2000; V
ALENTICH
-S
COTT ET AL
.
2020; Z
ELAYA
2005).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The nuculids reported in this study
were collected by the second author in
the eastern part of the Fildes Peninsula
on King George Island, South Shetland
Islands, near the Russian Antarctic
station ‘Bellingshausen’ during the 31st
Soviet Antarctic expedition (1985 to
1987). All stations were located in
Maxwell Bay. Water entering this bay
originates from the Weddell Sea by east
wind drift or from the Bellingshausen
Sea by west wind drift, depending on
seasonal water circulation and prevail-
ing wind direction (G
ORDON
& N
OWLIN
1978). Water temperature and salinity
were not measured but are likely similar
those found by T
IAN ET AL
. (2015). Water
temperature in Ardley Cove was there
in the range 0.72-1.36°C (mean: 1.02°C)
and the salinity from 33.97 to 34.14.
The Fildes Strait, one of the sampling
areas, is characterised by an extremely
strong, tide-dependent current. The
bottom of this area consists mainly of
hard substrate, stones and rubble. The
sediment of Ardley Cove, the second
sampling area, consists of fine sand and
silt, and in the intertidal zone (the tidal
range is about 1 to 1.5 metres), third sam-
pling area, there are boulder fields and
littoral pools with rocky bottoms, some of
which are covered with brown algae. All
samples, except those from the intertidal
zone, were collected using a dredge with
an edge length of 0.3 m. The contents
were sieved through a sieve with a mesh
size of 0.5 mm. Samples from the inter-
tidal zone were taken during low tide
using a plastic tube corer (5 cm2). This
method is extensively described by B
ICK
& A
RLT
(2013). These samples were
washed through a sieve with a mesh size
of 0.2 mm. All samples were fixed in 4 %
borax-buffered formalin.
The molluscs from these samples
were hand-sorted under a low-magnifi-
cation binocular (Zeiss Discovery.V8)
and colour photographs were taken of
selected samples at IOW using a micro-
scope camera (Axiocam 105 color).
High-resolution imaging was done on
selected samples using the Scanning
Electron Microscope at IOW (FESEM
Zeiss Merlin VP compact with Gemini I
electron column; acceleration voltage 5-
15 KV; 5-axis stage with 3-70° tilt func-
tion; detectors: SE, VPSE, InLens SE,
Iberus, 43 (1), 2025
84
BSD; Magnification: 12-2.000 000). The
SEM samples were coated with Iridium
or Gold, by using a Cressington sputter
coater for high resolution imaging.
The holotype and paratypes of the
newly described species are retained in
the Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt am
Main (SMF). The material of Nucula falk-
landica) is kept in the reference collection
at the Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea
Research (IOW), Warnemünde,
Germany.
Z
ETTLER
& B
ICK
: Nuculidae from King George Island (South Shetland, Antarctica)
85
SYSTEMATICS
Remarks: Our material agrees well
with the description by D
ELL
(1990). The
maximum shell length is 3.4 mm. The
shell surface is sculptured with growth
folds and radial ribs. The prodissoconch
has a length of 360 µm. The perios-
tracum is yellowish-brownish and
sometimes appears covered with ferrug-
inous deposits. The hinge bears 7-8
anterior and 4-5 posterior teeth. The
chondrophore is strong, trapezoidal and
directed forwards.
D
ELL
(1964) used material that exists
in the British Museum (Natural History)
under the incorrect designation Nucula
pisum G.B. Sowerby I, 1833 from the
Malvinas/Falkland Islands, noting that
the type material cannot be found, the
description by P
RESTON
(1912) is vague
and inaccurate and the illustration of
the outer shell view is not good. A
syntype of the species is housed at
Museum of Natural History in Paris
(MNHN-IM-2000-38316). Thankfully,
photos were taken at our request, which
allowed us to clearly confirm our identi-
fication of N. falklandica.
E
NGL
(2012) illustrated Nucula
minuscula Pfeffer, 1886 sensu Melvill &
Standen, 1907 (NMS 1921.143.686)
sampled on the South Orkney Islands
and kept in the National Museum Scot-
land, and identified it as N. falklandica.
He also illustrated N. falklandica from
the 26th Soviet Antarctic Expedition
from King George Island, housed in the
Zoological Museum Hamburg.
R
AUSCHERT
(1991) published his find-
ings from the 26th (1980-1982) and 30th
(1984-1986) Soviet Antarctic Expedition
from Ardley Cove near King George
Island. The provenance of these records
is almost exactly the same as that of the
present study. At that time, he detected
the species at 12 stations in water depths
between 5 and 70 metres. In the present
study we observed this species between
35 and 70 m.
Class B
IVALVIA
Linnaeus, 1758
Family N
UCULIDAE
Gray, 1824
Genus Nucula Lamarck, 1799
Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912 (Figs. 1-10)
Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912: 637, pl. 21, Fig. 3; C
ARCELLES
& W
ILLIAMSON
1951: 322; P
OWELL
1960: 169; Powell 1965: 367; D
ELL
1964: 139, Figs. 1-17; D
ELL
1990: 5, Figs. 8-9; R
AUSCHERT
1991:
14; V
ILLARROEL
& S
TUARDO
1998: 127, Figs. 1, 27-28, 68-69, 102-103; E
NGL
2012: 37, pl. 1, fig. 2;
Z
ELAYA
2015: 254
Not: L
INSE
1997: 45 (as Nucula sp. with clear concentric-radial network structure); L
INSE
1999
(based on L
INSE
1997): 404; L
INSE
2002: 115, pl. 17, Figs. 9.1.2 (1-5)
Material examined: South Shetland Islands, King George Island • 7 individuals; 62.2332°S, 58.9985°W;
70 m; 30 Jan. 1986; Fildes Strait, Stn. 7, dredge. • 6 individuals; 62.2000°S, 58.9472°W; 50 m; 9 Jan.
1987; Ardley Cove, Stn. 27, dredge. • 6 individuals; 62.2032°S, 58.9410°W; 35 m; 13 Jan. 1987; Ardley
Cove, Stn. 30, dredge. • 4 individuals; 62.2032°S, 58.9395°W; 40 m; 7 Feb. 1987; Ardley Cove, Stn.
40, dredge. • 1 individual; 62.2032°S, 58.9397°W; 50 m; 1 Mar. 1987; Ardley Cove, Stn. 56, dredge.
• 10 individuals; 62.2041°S, 58.9295°W; 90 m; 7 Mar. 1987; Ardley Cove, Stn. 58, dredge.
The records by L
INSE
(1997, 1999 and
2002) for the Magellan region do not refer
to Nucula falklandica. The description pro-
vided and the images given in L
INSE
(2002) clearly show a different Nucula
species, probably Nucula pseudoexigua Vil-
larroel & Stuardo, 1998, although the dis-
tinction of that species from Nucula carlot-
tensis Dall, 1897 is still unclear (see
V
ALENTICH
-S
COTT ET AL
. 2020).
Iberus, 43 (1), 2025
86
(Right page) Figures 1-10. Nucula falklandica Preston, 1912, from King George Island, South
Shetland Islands. 1, 2: left valve, Fildes Strait, Stn. 7, depth 70 m (length 2.1 mm); 3: posterior
view of a complete shell, same locality (height 3.3 mm); 4: right valve, same locality (length 2.9
mm); 5: hinge of a right valve, same locality; 6, 7: specimen from Ardley Cove, Stn. 27, depth 50
m, views from right valve and dorsal side (length 3.1 mm); 8, 9: exterior of right valve and interior
of left valve, same locality (length 2.6 mm); 10: hinge of another left valve, same locality.
Diagnosis: Small species of ~1.8 mm,
with posterior umbo. Umbonal angula-
tion of ~120°. Ligament almost horizon-
tal. Hinge with 4 anterior and 3 poste-
rior teeth.
Description: Small elongated shell,
length up to 1.8 mm; height up to 1.3
mm (holotype length 1.5 mm, height 1.1
mm), equivalve, subequilateral,
rounded triangular outline, umbo poste-
riorly; surface whitish, transparent, with
light yellowish glossy periostracum.
Prodissoconch: Flattened, with
nearly circular outline, smooth; limit
with dissoconch clear; length between
184 and 190 µm and in height between
143 and 146 µm (Figs. 17, 18).
Dissoconch: Globose, subtruncated
in outline; pointed protruding umbo
posterior of midline inclined posteri-
orly; convex dorsal- and ventral
margins, prolonged anteriorly (Figs. 11,
12). Surface only sculptured by fine
irregular commarginal growth stages
and numerous fine growth lines. Lunula
and escutcheon inconspicuous (Figs. 15,
16). Internally smooth and glossy with
sharp margin (Figs. 13, 14); ventral
margin smooth. Anterior and posterior
adductor muscle scars not visible.
Pallial line without sinus. Posterior and
anterior parts of hinge plate with 3-4
strong teeth, rectangular in cross-
section, projecting vertically from hinge;
teeth near umbo very short. Resilifer
elongated-trapezoid (Fig. 15).
Ecology: As only 3 individuals were
found in 2 very different habitats, little
can be said about the ecology of this
species. One animal was found in inter-
tidal shallow water between stones. Two
animals were found in a water depth of
100 m with muddy sediment. The differ-
ent sediments and depths could be an
Genus Ennucula Iredale, 1931
Ennucula ardleyana n. sp. (Figs. 11-18)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D27A5879-F148-4891-8CFF-68581EA9F25D
Type material. Holotype: South Shetland Islands, King George Island, 1 live-collected specimen
(Figs. 11-12); 62.2025°S, 58.9187°W; 100 m; 28 Feb. 1986; Ardley Cove, Stn. 12, dredge; SMF 367275.
Paratypes: • 1 live-collected specimen (Figs. 13-16); same data as holotype; SMF 367276. • 1 live-
collected specimen (Figs. 17-18); 62.1969°S, 58.9357°W; Intertidal zone; 12 Feb. 1987; Ardley Cove,
Stn. 47, core; SMF 367277.
Type locality: South Shetland Islands, King George Island, 62.2025°S, 58.9187°W; 100 m; 28 Feb.
1986; Ardley Cove, Stn. 12, dredge.
Etymology: The name refers to the type locality in Ardley Cove, King George Island, South Shet-
land Islands.
Z
ETTLER
& B
ICK
: Nuculidae from King George Island (South Shetland, Antarctica)
87
Figuras 1-10. Nucula falklandicaPreston, 1912, de la Isla del Rey Jorge, Islas Shetland del Sur. 1, 2:
valva izquierda, estrecho de Fildes, Stn. 7, profundidad 70 m (longitud 2,1 mm); 3: vista posterior de
una concha completa, misma localidad (altura 3,3 mm); 4: valva derecha, misma localidad (longitud
2,9 mm); 5: charnela de una valva derecha, misma localidad; 6, 7: ejemplar de Ardley Cove, Stn. 27,
profundidad 50 m, vistas de la valva derecha y del lado dorsal (longitud 3,1 mm); 8, 9: exterior de la
valva derecha e interior de la valva izquierda, misma localidad (longitud 2,6 mm); 10: charnela de
otra valva izquierda, misma localidad.
12
3
45
678
910 1 mm
1 mm
Iberus, 43 (1), 2025
88
Figures 11-18. Ennucula ardleyana n. sp., King George Island, South Shetland Islands. 11, 12: holo-
type, Ardley Cove, Stn. 12, depth 100 m (length 1.5 mm); 13-16: paratype (length 1.8 mm), same
locality as holotype; 17, 18: paratype (length 1.7 mm), Ardley Cove, Lapidary Point, Stn. 47, inter-
tidal zone.
Figuras 11-18. Ennucula ardleyana n. sp., de King George Island, Shetland del Sur. 11, 12: holotipo, Ardley
Cove, Stn. 12, profundidad 100 m (longitud 1,5 mm); 13-16: paratipo (longitud 1,8 mm), misma locali-
dad que el holotipo; 17, 18: paratipo (longitud 1,7 mm), Ardley Cove, Lapidary Point, Stn. 47, zona inter-
mareal.
11
1 mm
12
13 14
15 16
17 18
indication that this species is much
more widespread, but could often be
overlooked due to its small size.
Differential diagnosis: We present a
comparison with the known species of
Ennucula from Sub-Antarctic and adja-
cent territories of South America: the
South Georgian Ennucula georgiana Dell,
1964 and species from the Strait of Mag-
ellan or Malvinas/Falkland Islands,
such as Ennucula puelcha (A. d’Orbigny,
1842), Ennucula grayi (A. d’Orbigny,
1846) and Ennucula eltanini Dell, 1990.
Ennucula georgiana is larger (9-15
mm in length), heavier, dorsally and
ventrally rounded, with posterior
margin subangled about in the middle.
It has 12 anterior and 7 posterior teeth.
A specimen 2.7 mm long pictured at the
Natural History Museum Rotterdam
(RMNH.MOL.463998) already has 7
anterior and 4 posterior teeth. The resil-
ifer is large, triangular and projecting
anteroventrally. However, it is not
certain that the identification is correct,
since the location is Weddell Sea and not
South Georgia. Ennucula georgiana is
known so far from South Georgia (D
ELL
1964; Z
ELAYA
2005).
Ennucula grayi, known from central
Chile, Patagonia (including Strait of
Magellan) and the Malvinas/Falkland
Islands (D
ELL
1964; L
INSE
1997; V
ILLAR
-
ROEL
& S
TUARDO
1998; F
ORCELLI
2000;
Z
ELAYA
2005; V
ALENTICH
-S
COTT ET AL
.
2020), is also distinctly larger (up to 20
mm), subovate, and is a very robust
species. It has 20 anterior and 7 poste-
rior teeth. The resilifer is large, conical
and projecting anteroventrally. Even
very small individuals (1.8 to 2 mm
long) already have 5 or 6 anterior and 3
to 4 posterior teeth. The most striking
difference between E. grayi and the E.
ardleyana n. sp. described here is the
shape of the resilifer (robust conical pro-
jecting from the hinge line into the
mantle cavity, versus elongated trape-
zoid lying on the hinge line) and the
outer shape of the shell, which already
differs from E. ardleyana n. sp. in this
juvenile size. At 211 to 224 µm, the
prodissoconch is larger than that of the
newly described species.
Ennucula puelcha occurs in Brazil,
Uruguay, Argentina, Malvinas/Falk-
land Islands, and the Strait of Magellan
(D
ELL
1964; V
ILLARROEL
& S
TUARDO
1998; F
ORCELLI
2000; P
ASSOS
& M
AGAL
-
HÃES
2011; P
ASSOS ET AL
. 2024).
According to S
IMONE
(2009) and V
ALEN
-
TICH
-S
COTT ET AL
. (2020), this species is
restricted to the Atlantic Ocean from
Brazil to northern Argentina, with
uncertain occurrence in southern
Argentina and Chile. It is also larger
(up to 13 mm); globular. It has 18 ante-
rior and 8 posterior teeth. The main
difference is its robust conical resilifer
and its relatively blunt umbo (S
IMONE
2009).
Ennucula eltanini is only known from
the Strait of Magellan and western
Tierra del Fuego from water depths
between 307 and 544 m (D
ELL
1990;
Z
ELAYA
2005). We examined material
from the Strait of Magellan from depths
between 253 and 462 m. It is a small
species reaching 4.1 mm in length and
3.2 mm in height. The umbos are promi-
nent and the resilifer is small, roundish
and upright. It has 8-10 anterior and 5-7
posterior teeth. Juveniles of E. eltanini
with lengths of 1.5 to 2 mm already had
6 to 8 anterior and 3 to 4 posterior teeth,
which distinguishes it from E. ardleyana
n. sp. With a diameter of 204 to 216 µm,
the prodissoconch was larger than that
of the newly described species.
All species mentioned above are the
only known species of the genus Ennu-
cula from the sub-Antarctic region near
the Antarctic Peninsula (Scotia Sea,
Patagonia (including Strait of Magellan)
and Malvinas/Falkland Islands) and are
more than 1000 km away from King
George Island and separated by the
Bellingshausen and Scotia Sea with
water depth deeper 3000 m. Ennucula
ardleyana n. sp. differs from all of them
by its smaller size, the subtruncated
shape and the much smaller number of
anterior and posterior teeth and the
elongated trapezoid resilifer lying on
the hinge line. Considering the small
size of this species, the relative robust-
ness of the anterior hinge plate is strik-
ing.
Z
ETTLER
& B
ICK
: Nuculidae from King George Island (South Shetland, Antarctica)
89
DISCUSSION with E. elongata, regarding the tooth
formula and the resilifer structure. The
shape of the shell, pointed posteriorly in
E. elongata and rounded in E. ardleyana
n. sp., is clearly different, although the
size is the same. In addition, radial stria-
tions are visible in E. elongata (see R
HIND
& A
LLEN
1992), but not in E. ardleyana n.
sp. As mentioned in the introduction, no
Ennucula species were found during the
numerous Antarctic expeditions, alt-
hough many of them also visited the
study area in Fildes Strait and Ardley
Cove (e.g. R
AUSCHERT
1991; E
NGL
2012).
It is very likely that E. ardleyana n. sp.
was overlooked in earlier studies due to
its small size.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Sascha
Plewe (Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea
Research, Rostock) for his help in crea-
ting the SEM images. The Zoological
Museum in Hamburg provided us with
comparative material of Ennucula elta-
nini, E. grayi and E. puelcha, for which
we are grateful to the curator Prof. Dr.
Bernhard Hausdorf. We would like to
thank the curators Dr. Philippe Bouchet
and Pierre Lozouet from the Museum of
Natural History in Paris who, at our
request, took photos of a syntype of
Nucula falklandica.
Iberus, 43 (1), 2025
90
Two species of the Nuculidae were
found in waters near King George
Island in this study: Nucula falklandica
and Ennucula ardleyana n. sp.
The morphology of the studied spe-
cimens of N. falklandica is as reported by
D
ELL
(1990). Our material is 3.4 mm in
maximum length and it has up to 8
anterior and 5 posterior teeth compared
to 7-9 anterior and 5 posterior teeth
reported by D
ELL
(1990). The surface is
sculptured with some growth lines and
clearly visible stripes.
The present study has led to the dis-
covery of a previously undescribed
species and the first recent record of a
species of the genus Ennucula of South
Shetland Islands.
Of the 48 recent species of the genus
Ennucula known worldwide, only very
few are known with shell sizes smaller
than 3 mm (H
UBER
2010). The four sma-
llest are Ennucula interflucta (Marinco-
vich, 1973) from northern Chile with 1.5
mm, the Caribbean Ennucula elongata
(Rhind & Allen, 1992) with 2 mm, the
Atlantic Ennucula granulosa (A. E.
Verrill, 1884) with 2.5 mm and the North
American Ennucula similis (Rhind &
Allen, 1992) with 3 mm. Ennucula inter-
flucta lives in the intertidal zone, the
others in water depths below 500 m. The
greatest similarity can be recognised
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A
BSHER
T.M. & F
EIJÓ
A.R. 1998. Morphology
and ecology of bivalve molluscs from
Admiralty Bay, King George Island,
Antarctica. Brazilian Archives of Biology and
Technology, 41 (4): 437-446.
A
LDEA
C. & T
RONCOSO
J.S. 2008. Systematics
and distribution of shelled molluscs (Gas-
tropoda, Bivalvia and Scaphopoda) from
the South Shetland Islands to the Bellings-
hausen Sea, West Antarctica. Iberus, 26 (2):
43-117.
A
RNAUD
P.M., J
AjDjEWSKI
K., P
RESLER
P. &
S
ICIKSK I
J. 1986. Preliminary survey of
benthic invertebrates collected by Polish
Antarctic Expeditions in Admiralty Bay.
Polish Polar Research, 7 (1-2): 7-24.
B
ICK
A. & A
RLT
G. 2013. Description of inter-
tidal macro- and meiobenthic assemblages
in Maxwell Bay, King George Island, South
Shetland Islands, Southern Ocean. Polar
Biology, 36: 673-689.
C
ARCEL LES
A.R. & W
ILLIA MSON
S.I. 1951.
Catálogo de los moluscos marinos de la
Provincia Magallánica. Revista del Instituto
Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias
Naturales anexo al Museo Argentino de Cien-
cias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”: Cien-
cias Zoológicas, 2 (5): 225-283.
D
ELL
R. K. 1964. Antarctic and subantarctic
Mollusca: Amphineura, Scaphopoda and
Bivalvia. Discovery Reports, 33: 93-250, pls.
2-7.
D
ELL
R.K. 1972. Antarctic Benthos. Advances
in Marine Biology, 10: 1-216.
D
ELL
R.K. 1990. Antarctic Mollusca with
special reference to the fauna of the Ross
Sea. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New
Zealand, 27: 1-311.
E
GOROV A
E. 1982. Biological results of the
Soviet Antarctic expeditions, 7. Molluscs of
the Davis Sea (Eastern Antarctica). Explora-
tions of the Fauna of the Seas [Исследования
фауны морей], 26 (34): 1-142. [In Russian].
E
GOROV A
E. 1984. Bivalve molluscs in
Antarctica. La Conchiglia, 188/189: 18–23.
E
NGL
W. 2012. Shells of Antarctica. Hacken-
heim: Conchbooks.
F
ORCEL LI
D.O. 2000. Moluscos Magallanicos
Guia de Moluscos de Patagonia y Sur de Chile.
Vazquez Mazzini Editores, Buenos Aires.
G
ORDILLO
S., M
ALVÉ
M.E. & M
ORAN
G. 2017.
Benthic mollusc assemblages in West
Antarctica: taxa composition and ecologi-
cal insights. Marine and Freshwater Research,
68 (11): 2095-2105.
G
ORDON
A.L. & N
OWLIN
W.D.J. 1978. The
basin waters of the Bransfield Strait.
Journal of Physical Oceanography, 8: 258-264.
H
AIN
S. 1990. The benthic seashells (Gas-
tropoda and Bivalvia) of the Wedell Sea,
Antarctica. Reports on Polar Research, 70: 1-
181.
H
UBER
M. 2010. Compendium of Bivalves 1.
Harxheim, ConchBooks.
L
INSE
K. 1997. Die Verbreitung epibenthi-
scher Mollusken im chilenischen Beagle-
Kanal. Berichte zur Polarforschung, Bremer-
haven, 228: 1-131.
L
INSE
K. 1999. Mollusca of the Magellan
region. A checklist of the species and their
distribution. Scientia Marina, 63 (S1): 399-
407.
L
INSE
K. 2002. The shelled Magellanic Mollusca:
with special reference to biogeographic rela-
tions in the Southern Ocean. Ruggell, Lich-
tenstein, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG, 252
pp. (Theses Zoologicae, 34).
L
INSE
K., G
RIFFI THS
H.J., B
ARNES
D.K.A. &
C
LARKE
, A. 2006. Biodiversity and bio-
geography of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic
mollusca. Deep-Sea Research II, 53: 985-1008.
M
OLLUS CA
B
ASE EDS
. 2024. MolluscaBase.
Nuculidae J. E. Gray, 1824. Available online
from: World Register of Marine Species
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.ph
p?p=taxdetails&id=204, accessed July 22,
2024.
M
ÜHLENHARDT
-S
IEGEL
U. 1989. Antarktische
Bivalvia der Reisen des FS “Polarstern”
und des FFS “Walther Herwig” aus den
Jahren 1984 bis 1986. Mitteilungen aus dem
Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und
Institut, 86: 153-178.
N
ARCHI
, W., D
OMANESCHI
, O. & P
ASSOS
, F.D.
2002. Bivalves Antárticos e Subantárticos
coletados durante as Expedições Científi-
cas Brasileiras à Antártica I a IX (1982-
1991). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19 (3):
645-675.
N
ICOL
D. 1966. Descriptions, ecology, and
geographic distribution of some Antarctic
pelecypods. Bulletins of American Paleontol-
ogy, 51 (231): 1-102.
O
SORNO
-A
RANGO
A. & C
ANTER A
-K
INTZ
J.
2021. Benthic molluscs collected in Western
Antarctica during the “Caldas”, “Admiral
Padilla” and “Admiral Campos” expedi-
tions, southern summers 2014-2015, 2016-
2017 and 2018-2019. Bulletin of Marine and
Coastal Research, 50 (Supl. Esp.): 187-212.
P
ASSOS
F.D. & M
AGALHÃES
F.T. 2011. A com-
parative study of the Bivalvia (Mollusca)
from the continental shelves of Antarctica
and Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 11 (1): 143-155.
P
ASSOS
F.D., B
ATIST ÃO
A.R. & L
IMA
L.L.C.
2024. Checklist of marine Bivalvia (Mol-
lusca) from Brazil, with descriptive analy-
ses of their bathymetric and geographical
distribution. Zootaxa 5488 (1): 1-94.
P
OWELL
A.W.B. 1960. Antarctic and Sub-
antarctic Mollusca. Records of the Auckland
Institute and Museum, 5 (3-4): 117-193.
P
OWELL
A.W.B. 1965. Mollusca of Antarctic
and Subantarctic seas. In: van Mieghem, J.,
van Oye, P. (eds) Biogeography and
Ecology in Antarctica. Monographiae Biolo -
gicae, Vol 15: 333-380, Springer, Dordrecht.
P
RESTO N
H.B. 1912. Characters of six new
pelecypods and two new gastropods from
the Falkland Islands. Annals and Magazine
of Natural History, (Ser. 8) 9: 636-640, pl. 21.
R
AUSCHERT
M. 1991. Ergebnisse der faunisti-
schen Arbeiten im Benthal von King
George Island (Südshetlandinseln, Antark-
tis). Berichte zur Polarforschung, 76: 1-75.
R
HIND
P.M. & A
LLEN
J.A. 1992. Studies on
the deep-sea Protobranchia (Bivalvia): the
family Nuculidae. Bulletin of the British
Museum Natural History (Zoology), 58 (1):
61-93.
S
IMONE
, L.R.L. 2009. Comparative morphol-
ogy among representatives of main taxa of
Scaphopoda and basal protobranch
Bivalvia (Mollusca). Papéis Avulsos de
Zoologia, 49 (32): 405-457.
T
IAN
S., J
IN
H., G
AO
S., Z
HUANG
Y., Z
HANG
Y., W
ANG
B. & C
HEN
J. 2015. Sources and
distribution of particulate organic carbon
in Great Wall Cove and Ardley Cove, King
George Island, West Antarctica. Advances
in Polar Science, 26 (1): 55-62.
Z
ETTLER
& B
ICK
: Nuculidae from King George Island (South Shetland, Antarctica)
91
T
HIELE
J. 1912. Die antarktischen Schnecken
und Muscheln. In Drygalski, E. von (Ed.):
Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition, 1901–1903, im
Auftrage des Reichsamtes des Innern. Wissen-
schaftliche Ergebnisse Vol. 13. Zoologie 5
(2): 185-285, pls 11-19.
V
ALENT ICH
-S
COTT
P., C
OAN
E.V. & Z
ELAYA
D. 2020. Bivalve seashells of western South
America. Marine bivalve mollusks from Punta
Aguja, Perú to Isla Chiloé, Chile. vii + 593 pp.
Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of
Natural History.
V
ILLAR ROEL
M. & S
TUARD O
J. 1998. Proto-
branchia (Mollusca: Bivalvia) chilenos
recientes y algunos fósiles. Malacologia, 40:
113-229.
W
HITTL E
, R.J., Q
UAGLI O
, F., C
RAME
, J.A. &
L
INSE
, K. 2012. Nuculidae (Bivalvia) in the
Cape Melville Formation, King George
Island, Antarctica, with an overview of the
bivalve fauna. Antarctic Science, 24 (6): 625-
633.
Z
ELAYA
D.G. 2005. The bivalves from the
Scotia Arc islands: species richness and
faunistic affinities. Scientia Marina, 69 (S2):
113-122.
Iberus, 43 (1), 2025
92
Article
Full-text available
During the 31st Soviet Antarctic expedition in 1986/87, the mollusc fauna was studied at several stations in Ardley Cove, a bay of Maxwell Bay on King George Island, and in Fildes Strait (between King George Island and Nelson Island). The depths sampled were between the intertidal and 100 metres. While the two intertidal stations were visited several times, the deeper stations were usually sampled once. A total of 59 mollusc taxa were identified, of which 27 belonged to Bivalvia, 29 to Gastropoda and 3 to Polyplacophora. Some of these species were discovered for the first time in the area of King George Island. While some species were found exclusively in the intertidal zone, others were restricted to the greater depths. Only very few species were detected from eulittoral down to depths of 100 metres. Particularly worth mentioning are the taxonomic analyses of the species within the genera Altenaeum Spaink, 1972 and Cuspidaria Nardo, 1840 as well as the species Onoba filostria (Melvill & Standen, 1912) and Kidderia subquadrata (Pelseneer, 1903). The importance of a thorough taxonomic analysis for the composition of the mollusc fauna, especially with regard to climateinduced changes in the Antarctic, is discussed.
Article
Full-text available
After revising the literature and consulting the pertinent virtual databases, we here list all Brazilian marine bivalves currently considered as valid and include data on their geographical and bathymetrical distribution. The list contains 516 indigenous and nine introduced species. Among the former, 461 species are autobranchs and 64 are protobranchs. They belong to 42 superfamilies, nine of them containing at least 20 species each; there are 77 families, twelve of which contain at least 15 species; most of these more speciose groups are typical from shallow waters (e.g., Tellinoidea and Veneroidea) and/or have been reviewed taxonomically (Nuculanoidea and Cuspidarioidea). There are 368 species which live exclusively on the continental shelf, 86 are only known from deep water and 68 species have a wide bathymetric distribution. More than half of the 368 continental-shelf species have a wide geographic distribution; 40 species are exclusive to the Brazilian province, the others also occur in the Caribbean and/or Argentine shelf waters; those from the Caribbean need more investigation. Important knowledge gaps remain for Brazilian Galeommatoidea and Nuculoidea, deep-sea species of Mytilidae, Teredinidae, and Arcidae; the Poromyidae, Limopsidae, Propeamussiidae, and Thyasiridae appear to be underrepresented. Compared to 29 world regional faunas of marine bivalves, the Brazilian diversity ranks in the ninth position.
Book
Full-text available
The culmination of an eight year study, this monograph treats all bivalve mollusks living from northern Perú to southern Chile. A total of 256 species are described and illustrated with detailed color photographs and drawings. All habitats in the region are included from the intertidal splash zone to the bathyal depths of the ocean basins. The book has over 5,000 complete bibliographic references to the bivalves including citations on the biology, physiology, ecology, and taxonomy of this commercially and biologically important group. Character tables and dichotomous keys assist the reader in identification. Also included in the 593 page book is an illustrated key to the superfamiles of the region, and a complete glossary.
Article
Full-text available
Concentrations of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), particulate organic carbon (POC) and its stable carbon isotope composition (δ 13 C) were analyzed to investigate the biogeochemical characteristics and sources of POC in Great Wall Cove (GWC) and Ardley Cove (AC) during the austral summer. POC concentrations ranged from 50.51 to 115.41 μg·L −1 (mean±1 standard deviation: 77.69±17.27 μg·L −1) in GWC and from 63.42 to 101.79 μg·L −1 (82.67±11.83 μg·L −1) in AC. The POC δ 13 C ranged from −30.83‰ to −26.12‰ (−27.40‰±0.96‰) in GWC and from −28.21‰ to −26.65‰ (−27.45‰±0.47‰) in AC. The temperature and salinity results showed distinct runoff signals in both GWC and AC, although the δ 13 C data and POC distribution indicate a negligible influence of land sources upon POC. The δ 13 C values suggest that POC is of predominantly marine origin. The POC/Chl-a ratio and the relationship between POC and Chl-a indicate that phytoplankton, organic detritus and heterotrophic organisms are significant contributors to POC in GWC and AC.
Article
Full-text available
Although different studies in Antarctica have dealt with benthic communities, few studies have focused on molluscan assemblages and their ecology. During the austral summer of 2011, 17 stations between depths of 68.5 and 754 m were sampled in West Antarctica using a demersal bottom trawl pilot net on board RV ARA Puerto Deseado. In all, 1848 specimens of shelled molluscs were recorded. Gastropods were the most diverse group (species richness = 74) and bivalves were the most abundant (n = 1344). Shannon–Wiener diversity index values ranged between 0.58 and 2.99, with great variation at different stations. Cluster analysis using the Bray–Curtis coefficient showed three distinct assemblages types: one dominated by suspension feeders; a second with representatives from different trophic groups, including suspension feeders, grazers, scavengers, predators and deposit feeders; and a third, more differentiated, with few taxa and dominated by deposit feeders. Finally, multivariate analysis suggests that bivalves were more sensitive to temperature, whereas gastropods were more sensitive to depth.
Article
The classification of the subclass Protobranchia followed here considers the families Nuculidae, Nuculanidae, Siliculidae, Sareptidae, Malletiidae, and Tindariidae in the order Nuculoida, and the family Acharacidae in the order Solemyoida. We also follow the separatation of Malletiidae from Nuculanidae, further justifying it on anatomical grounds. Fifteen protobranch species of Recent distribution in continental Chile, five Antarctic, and seven fossil species were studied. Out of a total of 35 species cited for the coast of Chile and Graham Land in Antarctica, only the following 27 are here accepted as valid: Nucula austrobenthalis Dell, 1990; Nucula (Nucula) falklandica Preston, 1912; Nucula (Nucula) fernandensis Villarroel, 1971; Nucula (Nucula) interflucta Marincovich, 1973; Nucula (Nucula) pisum Sowerby I, 1833; Ennucula eltanini Dell, 1990; Ennucula grayi (d'Orbigny, 1846); Ennucula puelcha (d'Orbigny, 1842); Nuculana (Saccella) cuneata (Sowerby I, 1833); Nuculana (Borissia) inaequisculpta (Lamy, 1906); Propeleda longicaudafaThiele, 1912; Tindariopsis sulcuta (Gould, 1852); Silicula patagonica Dall, 1908; Silicula rouchi Lamy, 1911; Yoldia (Aequiyoldia) eightsi (Jay, 1839); Yoldiella chilenica (Dall, 1908); Yoldiella ecaudata (Pelseneer, 1903); Yoldiella granula (Dall, 1908); Yoldiella indolens (Dall, 1908); Malletia chilensis des Moulins, 1832; Malletia magellanica Smith, 1875; Malletia patagonica Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889; Malletia inaequalis Dall, 1908; Malletiella sorror Soot Ryen, 1959; Tindaria virens (Dall, 1890); Tindaria salaria Dall, 1908; and Acharax macrodactyla (Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889). Nucula (N.) pseudoexigua Villarroel & Stuardo, a new species from the Strait of Magellan is described. The Antarctic species Propeleda longicaudata Thiele, 1912, is reported for the first time from the Strait of Magellan. A diagnosis for every taxonomic category and a detailed description for every species are given, including the shell features traditionally utilized, as well as the soft parts. Most features having so far been studied only on a few species of the subclass, allow a comparative analysis with the Chilean representatives, summarized as follows. (1) Size varies within the different families. Living nuculids are in general smaller than nuculanaceans and solemyaceans. The largest size found in the Chilean Nuculidae reaches 20.6 mm length in Ennucula grayi, whereas among Nuculanidae and Malletiidae, a maximum measured length of 51.0 mm was found in Malletia chilensis. A Chilean fossil of this genus measured 60 mm. (2) The studied species fall within the three known basic forms: nuculoid, nuculanoid, and solemyoid (Fig. 61). (3) No comprehensive study of hinge tendencies within each family has been attempted; such study would possibly permit to examine affinities and divergencies at lower taxonomic ranks. (4) The study of the ligament in specific taxa should be used to test the validity of prevailing models and interpretations. So far, the study of the ligament in Nuculidae and Nuculanidae has followed Owen's (1959) interpretation of an external or lamellar layer connected with the mantle margins, and another internal, fibrous layer connected to the isthmus of the mantle. A resilifer or chondrophore interrupts the two teeth series, and is directed anteriorly in Nucula and Ennucula (Fig. 3A, cdr), is more or less straight in Yoldia (Fig. 129), and is directed posteriorly in Nuculana (Fig. 3). Previously, Stempell (1898a) demonstrated that the ligament in Malletia can be divided in anterior, central and posterior parts, the central part corresponding to the resilium (inner layer of the ligament), and the anterior and posterior parts with an external origin. Thus, such similar differentiation in Nuculidae, Nuculanidae and Malletiidae, suggested that the resilium of internal position in Nucula and Nuculana, had migrated to become external in Malletiidae, without dissapearing. An intermediate stage in its position is observed in Tindariopsis, as was shown by Stempell (1898a). Relevance is given to the novel and most stimulating interpretation on the evolution of the ligament in the bivalves advanced by Waller (1990). He questions the traditional model of an amphidetic primary ligament of three layers, and proposes a protobranch stem group from which two major types of ligament for the bivalves evolved. (5) Variation in number and size of hinge teeth does not allow to use them as taxonomic features of generic or suprageneric value, but size and form may sometimes offer specific taxonomic value, as noted by Knudsen (1970) and Villarroel (1971). (6) The palps are very similar in the Nuculacea and Nuculanacea, but their homology with the Solemyidae is not well known. The palps in Solemya are not interpreted as doubled palps appendixes of other protobranchs; the palps sheets would be reduced to simple ridges (Fig. 11) in the edge of the furrow that joins the mouth with the appendixes (Figs. 15-17)(Ridewood, 1903; Morse, 1913; Yonge, 1939; Reid, 1980). The appendix or palp tentacle on the external sheet of every palp considered by Drew (1901) be equivalent of a pair of hypertrophiated fold (Figs. 10, 12, other figs., tp) differ in position according to family (Fig. 61). In the Nuculanacea, the palp appendix is located on the terminal portion of the external palp sheet (e.g., Fig. 5, Silicula rouchi; Fig. 77, Nuculana (S.) cuneata; Fig. 90, Nuculana (B.) inaequisculpta). In the Nuculidae, the palp appendix is displaced to the end, because behind it there is an additional, non-extensible structure termed the "palp caecum," which represents a pair of hypertrophiated folds (Stasek, 1965). The proximal end of the palp appendix is linked with the surface of the palp external sheets and the palp caecum (Fig. 10, bp); its musculature is fused with the posterior foot retractor. Stasek's (1961) observation of this feature in Acila was corroborated, without exception, in every species studied. Nevertheless, in almost all the cases, the appendix was found in different degrees of contraction, preventing recognition of specific differences (Figs. 4 and 62, 74 and 76, tp). (7) In a general comparative analysis, the value of the soft parts in the differentiation of the higher categories within the subclass, is corroborated; however, due to the limited available knowledge of many internal structures and the few studied species, their taxonomic role at the specific level cannot be always ascertained. On the other hand, the complexity observed in some of the internal morphological parts permitted us to set forth complementary interpretations on their possible phylogenetic value, particularly in the case of the stomach, the position of the heart, and the configuration of the various types of siphons. Although stomach morphology has been described for species of Nucula, Nuculana and Malletia, a comparison became necessary, resulting in the identification of a new caecum and changes in the interpretation of the features observed by previous authors. In fact, its study in the available species allowed the conclusion that there is not one basic type or "Gastroproteia," as proposed by Purchon (1956, 1959), but three. These are: Type Ia. Common to the genera Nucula and Ennucula and characterized by several (three or four) ciliary sorting areas and a wide extension of the typhlosole (Figs. 18-32, 60). Type Ib. Common to the genera of Nuculanidae and Malletiidae and characterized by three ciliary sorting areas and a small extension of the minor typhlosole (Figs. 33-56, 60). Type Ic. Common to the genera of Solemyidae and Nucinellidae and characterized by the absence of distinct sorting areas and lack of typhlosoles. It is not difficult to differentiate the internal and external features recognized in the stomach of Nuculacea and Nuculanacea. The dorsal hood is smaller in Nuculanacea than in Nuculacea, and the three ducts that communicate the stomach with the digestive diverticula are also different in these two superfamilies (Figs. 18-56, 60). Similar differences were found in the ciliary sorting areas and the number of folds. For instance, the three additional sorting areas as1, as2 and as3 described by Purchon (1956), although not present in all species, can also be used in interspecific differentiation. Thus, the first one was found only in Nucula (Nucula) pisum (Fig. 21) and Ennucula puelcha (Figs. 29-31), but not in the other studied species of these genera; the second sorting area was found presenting different sizes in Nucula (Nucula) pisum, Nucula (Nucula) fernandensis, and Ennucula puelcha, being largest in the latter. The third above named sorting area was not observed in the studied Nuculacea, and none were found in the studied Nuculanacea. Such differences do not back Purchon's (1987b) generalization that one description can embody all of them (Fig. 60). Undoubtedly, the complexity of the gastric shield with its biggest modification in Propeleda and Malletia is larger in Nuculanacea than in Nuculidae and Solemyidae, but presently it is difficult to establish generic or specific differences. On the other hand, folding of the typhlosoles entering the style-sac has shown specific constancy in the studied species of Nucula and Ennucula. Development of the typhlosoles in Nuculanacea shows a different pattern. (8) Attention has also been given to the number of loops observed in the gastric and medium intestine with a pattern of coiling, which according to Heath (1937) is specific, with minimal intraspecific variation as observed in Nucula (Nucula) pisum and Nucula (Nucula) pseudoexigua (Figs. 63-67). It begins on the side of the stomach and continues anteriorly in some species almost reaching the mouth. It turns then dorsally to the esophagus and continues posteriorly above the stomach, or continues ventrally to form the coils prior to its final turn backwards.
Article
The Molluscan species collected during the 'Victor Hensen' Joint Magellan Campaign 1994 served as the basis for this species list. The list was then completed by literature data on the distribution of molluscs around the Falkland Islands, the other Scotia Arc Islands, Antarctica and the Kerguelen Islands. 397 Magellan species are known: 10 species of Aplacophora, 250 species of Gastropoda, 6 species of Scaphopoda and 131 species of Bivalvia. Polyplacophora and Cephalopoda are not included because both taxa need revision.