ArticlePDF Available

“We Work in an Industry Where We’re Here to Care for Others, and Often Forget to Take Care of Ourselves”: Aged-Care Staff Views on Self-Care

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Objective: This study aimed to explore self-care understanding and behaviours among aged-care workers in Australia. It was conducted as part of a project to co-produce a self-care resource for the Australian aged-care workforce. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with eleven aged-care staff and a focus group with four staff at an aged-care facility were undertaken to understand how staff understand and practice self-care and how death and dying affect workers. Thematic analysis was performed using software to generate a data coding tree. Results: Aged-care workers view self-care as taking care of oneself and as being a way to manage and maintain wellbeing so that they can continue to care. As practiced in daily life, self-care is highly individualised, with actions at work and at home having significant impact on a person’s wellbeing. Supportive organisational cultures and collegial teams were found to be particularly relevant in helping staff to deal with death and dying. Conclusions: Aged-care workers may benefit from an online self-care resource tailored to their specific needs and based on their first-hand experiences of working in aged-care. Organisations can support aged-care workers by creating space and time for self-care.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Academic Editor: James S. Powers
Received: 20 September 2024
Revised: 4 December 2024
Accepted: 17 December 2024
Published: 2 January 2025
Citation: Lane, A.P.; Tieman, J. “We
Work in an Industry Where We’reHere
to Care for Others, and Often Forget to
Take Care of Ourselves”: Aged-Care
Staff Views on Self-Care. Geriatrics
2025,10, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/
geriatrics10010003
Copyright: © 2025 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license
(https://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/).
Article
“We Work in an Industry Where We’re Here to Care for Others,
and Often Forget to Take Care of Ourselves”: Aged-Care Staff
Views on Self-Care
Anna P. Lane 1 ,† and Jennifer Tieman 2, *,†
1National Ageing Research Institute, 34-54 Poplar Road, Gate 4, Building 8, Royal Melbourne Hospital,
Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; a.lane@nari.edu.au
2
Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Palliative and Supportive Services, College of Nursing
and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
*Correspondence: jennifer.tieman@flinders.edu.au; Tel.: +61-8-7221-8237
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to explore self-care understanding and behaviours
among aged-care workers in Australia. It was conducted as part of a project to co-produce
a self-care resource for the Australian aged-care workforce. Methods: Semi-structured
interviews with eleven aged-care staff and a focus group with four staff at an aged-care
facility were undertaken to understand how staff understand and practice self-care and
how death and dying affect workers. Thematic analysis was performed using software to
generate a data coding tree. Results: Aged-care workers view self-care as taking care of
oneself and as being a way to manage and maintain wellbeing so that they can continue
to care. As practiced in daily life, self-care is highly individualised, with actions at work
and at home having significant impact on a person’s wellbeing. Supportive organisational
cultures and collegial teams were found to be particularly relevant in helping staff to
deal with death and dying. Conclusions: Aged-care workers may benefit from an online
self-care resource tailored to their specific needs and based on their first-hand experiences
of working in aged-care. Organisations can support aged-care workers by creating space
and time for self-care.
Keywords: self-care; residential aged-care facility; terminal care
1. Introduction
The purpose of this study was to explore the self-care experiences of aged-care
workers—defined as those providing services to older people in aged-care facilities and
the home—to inform the development of an online support resource. The importance of
aged-care has increasingly been recognised as the world’s population ages and the need
for care and support in older years grows. Workforce pressures have been acknowledged
as well as the changing demands on those providing direct hands-on care, which can lead
to fatigue and emotional stress. This is noted in both residential aged-care settings and in
those providing aged-care services to clients in the home [14].
Self-care broadly refers to the actions that an individual takes in the interest of their
own wellbeing, and often involves personal coping strategies [
5
]. It is often viewed as
a strategy to protect healthcare workers against burnout and compassion fatigue due
to occupational stress. Burnout is a “psychological syndrome emerging as a prolonged
response to chronic interpersonal stressors on the job” [
6
] and is characterised by emotional
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010003
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 2 of 12
exhaustion, distancing from patients and colleagues, as well as negative feelings and
cynicism about one’s job, and decreased motivation and productivity. Compassion fatigue
is a reduction in the ability to empathise due to physical and emotional exhaustion, and
contributes to burnout [7].
The challenges of aged-care work are well documented and include excessive work-
loads, time constraints, limited career growth opportunities, long working hours, heavy
physical demands, insufficient training to deal with complex conditions, and work schedule
demands [
8
10
]. For home care workers, concerns include working in unsanitary condi-
tions, working with aggressive patients, and working alone. With an estimated 35% of
all deaths in Australia occurring in residential aged-care facilities, dealing with death and
dying is considered another source of stress among the aged-care workforce [
11
]. However,
this association is currently underexplored.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the aged-care workforce. The
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety concluded in a special report: “The
COVID-19 pandemic has been the greatest challenge Australia’s aged care sector has faced.
Those who have suffered the most have been the residents, their families and aged care
staff” [
12
]. As frontline workers in an essential industry, aged-care workers reported to
their place of work during lockdowns and quickly accommodated new workplace and
care protocols. They faced a plethora of anxiety-provoking issues including fatigue from
long shifts spent wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), fear of being exposed to
COVID-19 at work and taking the infection home to families, as well as anxiety associated
with high rates of death in aged-care facilities [1315].
While there is no evidence on the prevalence of burnout among aged-care workers in
Australia, a systematic review of burnout in healthcare professionals providing palliative
care reported prevalence rates ranging from 3% to 66%, with professionals in general
settings experiencing more symptoms of burnout than those in specialist palliative care
settings [
16
]. Aside from the toll on workers’ own health and wellbeing, burnout is harmful
to the aged-care sector because it causes high staff turnover and workforce shortages [
16
,
17
],
and lower-quality patient care [
18
]. While self-care may be viewed as an individual action
and thus an individual responsibility, there are implications for organisations and how
they create the conditions in which self-care practice may be normalised and enabled.
Self-care theory and frameworks recognise wider determinants of individual self-care
behaviours [19].
The importance of self-care for the aged-care workforce is observed in policies and
standards governing the sector. Under Standard 7 of the Aged Care Quality Standards,
aged-care providers are required to employ a workforce that is “skilled and qualified to
provide safe, respectful and quality care services” [
20
]. Additionally, Standard 9 of the
National Palliative Care Standards appeals to employers to support workers with self-care:
“Staff are trained in self-care strategies and advised on how to access personal support” [
11
].
Evidence about self-care and the aged-care workforce is limited. The associations
between self-care, wellbeing, and burnout have been examined more extensively in other
populations. A number of studies have evaluated self-care planning [
21
,
22
], mindfulness-
based programmes [
23
25
], yoga [
26
], and expressive writing [
27
] in cohorts of nurses
working in settings other than aged-care, such as oncology, hospices, and hospitals. In a
systematic review of burnout intervention studies for nursing home staff, three Australian
studies were identified which all looked specifically at improving care for clients with
dementia by supporting dementia care workers [28]. Additionally, knowledge about how
self-care influences wellbeing and theory for self-care is underdeveloped [19,29].
The capacity of Australia’s aged-care workforce to deliver quality care to people at the
end of their lives is a core ambition of the End of Life Directions for Aged Care (ELDAC)
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 3 of 12
project. Commencing in 2017 and supported by the Australian Government Department of
Health, ELDAC is conducted by a national consortium of eight partners including Flinders
University. The ELDAC team work to support aged-care workers through provision of
tailored and accessible information and resources. Given the evidence linking self-care
activity with the capacity to care for others, as well as the stressors facing the aged-care
sector currently, ELDAC conducted a project to explore and support self-care as viewed
by aged-care staff who provide direct care to older Australians in residential and home
care settings. Evidence on self-care among this population is lacking, yet it is imperative
to the development of tailored resources to support this vital workforce. Given that this
study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we needed to adjust strategies
for participation to meet the social distancing restrictions and lockdowns. In particular,
face-to-face focus groups were not feasible, and online interviews and focus groups were
used in their place. However, even with these restrictions, through the discovery stage of
this project to design a useful and accessible self-care resource, we gained insights into the
self-care experiences and needs of aged-care workers.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants and Data Collection
The findings presented in this paper represent the first phase of a co-design project
conducted online during the COVID-19 pandemic, to develop an online self-care resource.
This phase of the co-design process—which engaged aged-care staff to explore their views
on self-care—involved ideation. Using insights and knowledge gathered in the first phase,
the research team identified initial design elements for an online tool and engaged again
with the aged-care staff to seek their inputs and refine further. A prototype (i.e., a web
page, with sub-pages of content informed by the findings) was then developed, followed
by testing and evaluation.
Participants were working aged-care staff with experience providing direct care to
older people in residential aged-care facilities and home care settings in Australia. A
convenience sample was recruited through ELDAC marketing channels, which included
items in the monthly newsletter and items on ELDAC’s social media channels such as
Twitter/X, LinkedIn, and Facebook. Interested staff completed an online expression-of-
interest form. The method of approach was open and exploratory, seeking to capture
diverse perspectives and include staff across a range of aged-care roles. Demographic data
were not obtained.
Data were collected by the first author via semi-structured interviews with eleven
staff, and one focus group with four staff at a private residential aged-care facility during a
lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With the intention of co-producing an online
resource, during this discovery stage of the project, participants were asked questions
covering three core topics: (i) What is ‘self-care’ and why does it matter to aged-care staff?
(ii) What resources have been developed for aged-care staff, and can staff benefit from them?
(iii) What are some ideas for managing stress and maintaining wellbeing over the long term
while doing this work? (to view Interview Guide, see Supplementary Material S1).
Participants were informed of the voluntary and confidential nature of their involve-
ment, and that they could withdraw or decline to answer questions at any time. The
interviews and focus group were conducted online between June and August 2021 and
were each about 45 to 60 min. They were recorded and transcribed verbatim. All partici-
pants received an e-voucher.
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 4 of 12
2.2. Analysis
The analysis was tailored to the needs of the project and the objective of creating
a self-help tool for those working in aged-care. Data were thematically analysed (AL)
through key stages of familiarisation, reviewing of transcripts, and coding for emergent
themes [
30
]. NVivo software version 12 was used to create a data coding tree. Analysis was
deductive and inductive and used to generate material for an online self-care resource. To
ensure fidelity between the interview data and emergent themes, the authors met regularly
to discuss key findings. Quotations are included here to illustrate the themes identified in
the data. Occupations are used to protect participant anonymity. Findings were discussed
at project advisory group meetings. The project advisory group comprised stakeholders
with practical or subject matter expertise in the areas of aged-care, palliative care, self-care,
and technology.
2.3. Ethics
This study was conducted as part of a project to co-produce a self-care resource for
the Australian aged-care workforce. Ethical approval was obtained from the Flinders
University Human Research Ethics Committee (project no. 4652).
3. Results
Participants were 14 aged-care staff, most (n= 13) of whom were female and working
in the residential aged-care setting. Only one participant worked in the home care setting.
The sample included a range of occupational roles that make up the direct care workforce
(Table 1). Some (n= 4) participants had managerial responsibilities. One person partici-
pated in both an interview and a focus group. Key themes are identified in Table 2and
discussed below.
Table 1. Details of participants.
Occupation Setting State Interviews Focus Group
1. Personal care worker (PCW) RAC SA
2. Home support worker (HSW) Home SA
3. Personal care worker RAC SA
4. Consultant in residential aged-care and former
personal care worker RAC SA
5. Registered Nurse (RN), Residential Manager RAC QLD
6. Chaplain RAC NSW
7. Chaplain RAC NSW
8. Pastoral carer RAC VIC
9. Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) (Community
palliative care, RACF outreach) RAC NSW
10. Lifestyle assistant RAC SA
11. Registered Nurse, Chief Executive (CE) RAC ACT
12. Clinical manager RAC ACT
13. Clinical manager RAC ACT
14. Consumer concierge officer RAC ACT
Note. RAC: residential aged-care. Home: home care. ACT: Australian Capital Territory. SA: South Australia. QLD:
Queensland. NSW: New South Wales. VIC: Victoria. The grey shading indicates participation in an interview, a
focus group, or both.
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 5 of 12
Table 2. Key themes.
Theme
1. Holistic Self-Care and Shared Responsibility
2. Self-Care, Individual Responsibility, and Organisational Support
3. Preventing Burnout in the Face of Acute and Ongoing Challenges
4.
Personalised Approaches to Self-Care and the Role of Workplace Relationships
5.
Emotional Impact of Death and Dying: Coping Through Care, Connection, and
Reflection
3.1. Holistic Self-Care and Shared Responsibility
Participants typically used the expression “looking after yourself” to explain the
meaning of self-care and connected their health and wellbeing with their capacity to care
for others.
“Self-care means looking after yourself in all respects of your health, whether
your mental health, your physical health, your spiritual health. I think it goes,
the old cliche saying, that you need to fill your cup before you can help others, so
making sure that you look after yourself first.” (HSW)
In addition, participants described self-care as taking care of each other, suggesting a
collective identity and sense of responsibility for each other’s wellbeing that has a flow-on
effect for aged-care residents/clients.
“You’ve got to support each other. You can’t turn around and say, ‘Oh well, that
carer can look after herself’, or whatever. You’ve all got to look after each other.
If you see that one’s doing more than what they should be doing, step in and you
help them.” (PCW)
3.2. Self-Care, Individual Responsibility, and Organisational Support
Participants felt self-care was important but something they often overlooked or let
slip because the core business of aged-care is to care for others. They frequently described
how the nature of the job made it difficult for them to care for themselves.
“We work in an industry where we’re here to care for others, and often forget to
take care of ourselves. In the different settings, more so the environment we live
in right now, it’s stressful. The job is stressful.” (RN)
Participants viewed self-care as a responsibility of the individual. However, their
responses strongly supported a view of organisations as having a role in encouraging and
supporting employee self-care, since many of the factors that affect them are beyond their
control.
“I think that yes, it still comes back to the individual and you could provide all the
tools possible, but the individual’s got to make the choice to use them. But that
being said, being a workforce in a changing environment, where we have to give
a lot of ourselves, not just physically, emotionally as well, that the organisation
should have some part in assisting them to take self-care.” (RN)
3.3. Preventing Burnout in the Face of Acute and Ongoing Challenges
Self-care was typically described as an approach to prevent exhaustion and burnout,
and participants identified several work challenges that would lead them to cut back on
their hours or leave the workforce completely. Participants described how the ongoing
threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with the aged-care reforms, has created an
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 6 of 12
ever-changing and demanding work environment. One participant described the impact of
lockdowns on staff and consumers, as well as their families.
“It’s very hard in aged-care. A lot of people don’t understand, even though we’ve
been doing them for 12 months. We’re currently in a lockdown now and the staff
and the residents, we went through a terrific gastro outbreak where the facility
was locked down. We had one day, we got the clear, we came out of that, and
after one day we were put into lockdown for COVID-19 prevention. The last
month has been very stressful and tiring for the residents and for the staff, and
the families.” (RN)
Another participant described the impacts on staff of change due to reforms and
pandemic conditions.
“On top of COVID, and as we keep saying to people, give us a break because
we have just lived through the worst two years of probably all our days. And
then on top of that, post the Royal Commission is just change after change after
change. That’s fatiguing.” (RN/CE)
They described high workloads, the demands of working in dementia care, and a
growing weariness with the negative press around the sector as having a significant impact
on workers. For managers, recruitment and retention of staff were sources of stress.
3.4. Personalised Approaches to Self-Care and the Role of Workplace Relationships
Participants described many ways in which they were taking care of themselves and
others, supporting the view that self-care is different for everyone and there is no one way
to look after yourself. When described how they take care, participants identified things
that they do at home and work. At work, the quality of relationships and interactions with
colleagues and residents were frequently described as having an impact on how they feel.
In view of the broad, individualised nature of self-care and participants’ emphasis on the
relationship between caring for oneself and caring for one’s colleagues, it was clear that the
quality of workplace relationships was a significant aspect of self-care from the perspective
of participants. Table 3shows some behaviours that impact aged-care staff wellbeing.
Table 3. Self-care behaviours of aged-care staff.
Actions Illustrative Quote
Actions performed at work
Going for a walk I would go for a walk in my lunch break, morning tea break it would be a walk
around the block. We used to do walking meetings. (Consultant/Former PCW)
Getting to know colleagues
I like to talk to people. I find out about them. You know, what do they like to do? Do
they have family? Like how’s their weekend. Or anything that I can help them with,
you know any work-related stuff that I can help them with. You know?
. . .
Because
you can detect, if one day they become very stressed. They get a bit worked up. You
know, this is not you. This is unlike you. (CNS)
Debriefing
Debriefing, that’s so important. And you know when someone debriefs to you,
you’re not judging them. You’re giving them, “What have you done well. Maybe
next time, you know this is what we can improve. But that’s all right. You know I’m
not blaming, but let’s learn from this”. (CNS)
Getting to know residents
Probably something that’s made me feel good in the work setting is having time
with the residents. It’s not task focused, it’s not going to see them because of a
complaint. It’s genuinely sitting with them and learning their story or speaking with
them as a fellow adult, and not being a nurse and having to go to them because you
have to, but learning from them . . . . (RN)
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 7 of 12
Table 3. Cont.
Actions Illustrative Quote
Releasing emotion
I help a gentleman once a fortnight. I go around, and we take turns, there’s different carers
that go, but once a fortnight, it’s my job to go and help him with his personal care. And he has
a brain tumour, and he’s fairly severely impacted by that. So it’s tough. It’s physically tough
and mentally tough. And when I leave there, sometimes I will just sit in my car and have a
good cry. (HSW)
Actions performed at home
Walking
For me, I like to walk, so that’s
. . .
. We’ve got three little dogs who love to walk, so I’m making
myself do a morning walk with them, which they all enjoy. And that way it just helps me
clear my brain before I start work and I’m in a much better frame of mind.
. . .
On a weekend,
I’ll do a two hour walk and just really expel it out. (RN/CE)
Leaving work at work
And then I try and bring no work home after 5:00. I’ll answer a phone but I won’t answer an
email. (RN/CE)
Cooking I cook, I create, doesn’t always work, but I just cut off from the rest of my dog and my
husband and I just focus on cooking, so that is just my time. (CM)
Taking a long bath For me, it’s about just when I have absolutely given everything to everybody, that’s when I
need to go home and recharge and that might be a three-hour bath. (RN/CE)
Talking to spouse
I’ve got my partner that I’m able to talk to about it. He can empathise. He doesn’t understand
it, but sometimes you just need to offload it in some way. (HSW)
Actions performed by other people
When teams work well together
You do get some that you can’t connect with, but you can’t connect with everybody anyway,
but the ones I work with now, we work really well together. We talk to each other. We don’t
just say, “Well, I’m doing this and you’re doing that”. We all pitch in and we all help, yeah.
(PCW)
When residents are happy
Having residents say that they loved me and that they enjoy being with me because I actually
listen to them. I don’t just say, “I haven’t got time now. I’ll be back later”.
. . .
It makes me feel
that I’m doing my job properly. (PCW)
When families give good feedback
I always feel good when I get feedback. Like, this morning we had a death over the weekend.
A really long-term resident here. And the daughter drove in especially this morning to tell me
what fantastic care she had. That makes me feel better, that what we’re doing is right.
(RN/CE)
When someone thanks you
And you know, if somebody grabs your hand and say thank you, all the brickbats that you
receive, that’s worth a thousand of them. . .. Just those kinds of things are really, that’s the
thing that keeps you going. It’s not all the brickbats. It’s not even the bouquets. It’s those
moments where you think I’ve made a difference in your life. That’s a good thing. You’ve
made a difference in mine. (RN/CE)
When supervisors empathise
But when I needed support, my coordinator had the knowledge and understanding to listen
and comfort me. She really listened. She just stopped. And she closed the door. And that was
really important.
. . .
Because sometimes all you want to do is talk. You don’t need someone to
solve anything for you. You just want to be heard. (LA)
3.5. Emotional Impact of Death and Dying: Coping Through Care, Connection, and Reflection
Participants reported being affected by the death and dying of the people that they
personally cared for. As one personal care worker said:
“Because I try and build a relationship with the people I look after, when they’re
palliative and they’re at the end of their life, shedding some tears for them is a
way for me of saying I loved her or him and I’m going to miss them.” (CW)
More intense emotional reactions were associated with first death experiences, unex-
pected or traumatic deaths, hospital deaths, and the presence of a personal connection. As
one participant mentioned:
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 8 of 12
“If people die in hospital, that’s another grief. Because they don’t get to say
goodbye. Often the hospital won’t tell you
. . .
. The family will tell you first that
the person’s died, not the hospital.” (RN/CE)
Death and dying was also seen as a stressor, and one that has been accentuated by the
pandemic and aged-care reforms.
“On top of COVID, on top of reform, there is the day-to-day business which in
aged-care is all about essentially living until death and dying is your companion.
And with the reforms that have come through, death and dying comes much
sooner than it used to do in the past. People could stay 5, 8, 10 years in aged-care.
Now they come in for usually less than two years. Your churn through palliation
is much greater. Your ability to burnout is pretty high. . ..” (RN/CE)
Participants described experiences that take place prior to death and when the res-
ident/client is at the end of life, immediately before and immediately after death, and
following death. For most participants, making residents comfortable was a way for them
to deal with death and dying.
“And I take a lot of pride in making them comfortable and knowing that I’ve
had a big part of that. So that if I am there when they do go, I’m usually holding
their hand, or talking to them, “It’s okay. It’s okay.”
. . .
I like to take a trolley
into the person’s room, we’ve got the mouth swabs on it, so we can keep them
moist. I have creams, and I’ve got a music player. And I usually put on their
favourite music, or I’ll do the things that they wanted for their end of care if it’s
requested.” (PCW)
Participants also recognised the importance of reflection and of expressing emotion
to deal with the death of a resident. Indeed, in so far as exposure to death and dying had
an impact on the mental wellbeing of aged-care workers, connecting with residents and
reflecting on their relationships and experiences with them comprised a key element of
self-care.
4. Discussion
This study explored the concept of self-care as it is understood and practiced by
aged-care staff in Australia. People working in aged-care understand self-care as taking
care of oneself. This is largely consistent with how other healthcare occupational cohorts
describe and make sense of self-care, including in the context of palliative care [
31
]. Self-
care may have had particular significance given that the study was conducted during the
COVID-19 pandemic, which led to additional workforce stressors and a deeper contact
with potential illness and death. Additionally, this personal understanding held by aged-
care staff is reflected in the resources that have proliferated because of the COVID-19
pandemic and are available for aged-care workers. These include the web-based resource
produced by Phoenix Australia [
32
], which was one of four organisations funded to deliver
an
A$12.4 million Grief
and Trauma Response Package to the aged-care sector, and the
self-care planning tool developed by Palliative Care Australia [33].
This study showed that self-care can mean many things and is highly individualised.
This can be seen in the diverse array of practices and behaviours that people have engaged
in to take care of themselves and others, and perhaps also reflects workforce diversity.
Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to supporting self-care. For self-care to be
effective and to have impact, people will benefit from having access to a range of resources
that they can personalise. Ideally, a useful resource will help to connect workers and
provide a mechanism for the sharing of ideas from those with first-hand experience. The
results of this study point to the importance of providing contextualised supports for
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 9 of 12
aged-care staff, and for designing a useful and accessible resource with aged-care staff,
as the need knowers and end users. The messages that resonate are those that capture
the stories and experiences of aged-care staff, as told in their own voices. To personalise
self-care, aged-care workers are likely to need access to a suite of resources.
The link between self-care and care quality as well as potential workforce sustain-
ability was evidenced, supporting investments by organisations in enabling and fostering
opportunities for staff to take up and embed practices of self-care. Promotion of staff
wellbeing requires a whole-of-system approach. While individuals have a responsibility
for their own wellbeing, organisational responses (such as supervisor support and the
development of adaptive coping skills) can facilitate recognition of workplace pressures
and enhance self-care [
34
,
35
]. This is particularly important given the increasing numbers
of older Australians who will be cared for through to the end of life in residential aged-care.
A workplace culture that recognises this reality, provides mechanisms for staff to take care
of themselves as care providers for older people at the end of life, and destigmatises the
expression of emotion is needed.
The themes presented here will be used to orient the resource to the specific needs of
its intended users. These themes inform the content of the resource and how best to deliver
that content to the end user. For example, the online resource may provide an interactive
and dynamic space for aged-care staff to share their own self-care tips and provide a
mechanism for staff to support each other with self-care. In recognition of the view that
self-care is a shared responsibility, content will target organisations and provide examples
of how they can support their managers and teams to practice self-care and look after each
other. Additionally, there will be content that raises staff awareness of situations that may
impact the wellbeing of staff, such as death and dying, the potential benefits of self-care for
maintaining wellbeing and resilience, and encouragement of self-care behaviour via the
provision of good practice examples.
Limitations and Future Research
Given that this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, insights on how
aged-care staff conduct self-care and many of the results may not be applicable after the
pandemic, which is a limitation of this study. We note that the absence of demographic
data could limit the generalisability of the findings and that this adds to the complexity of
considering the impacts on the understanding of self-care and the subsequent development
of self-care resources. While we tried to capture a diversity of perspectives, the study
would have benefited from greater participation of people from culturally and linguistically
diverse (CALD) backgrounds, and from workers in home care. The utility and accessibility
of existing resources for the aged-care workforce will need to be addressed in future studies.
Care workers are lightly trained, and increasingly the workforce is made up of foreign-born
workers with differing levels of English language proficiency. In a multicultural work-
force, there are likely to be considerable differences between people in their attitudes and
behaviours towards death and dying as well as self-care. Further, care workers in commu-
nities, as opposed to residential care settings, face additional occupational stressors and
barriers to self-care practice, which a self-care resource will need to take into consideration.
In community settings, workers are tasked with meeting the daily, personal care needs of
older people while they are living at home. Workers must navigate social complexities
involving older peoples’ family and friend networks, and they have limited face-to-face
contact with peers, who can be an important source of emotional as well as instrumental
support. In residential care settings, workers operate in proximity to their peers, which
affords greater opportunities for incidental interaction and mutual support, including with
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 10 of 12
self-care activity. Theory on self-care and the mechanisms via which wellbeing is influenced
remains to be resolved.
5. Conclusions
This study found that the aged-care workers who participated viewed self-care as
taking care of themselves, as well as a way to manage and maintain wellbeing so that
they could continue to provide care. Self-care was viewed as highly individualised, and
supportive organisational cultures and collegial teams were found to help staff deal with
death and dying. The findings indicate that organisations can support aged-care workers
by creating space and time for self-care, and that aged-care workers may benefit from
an online self-care resource tailored to their specific needs and based on the first-hand
experiences of those working in aged-care.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:
//www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/geriatrics10010003/s1, File S1: Interview Guide.
Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, A.P.L. and J.T.; methodology, A.P.L.; formal analysis,
A.P.L.; data curation, A.P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.L.; writing—review and editing,
J.T.; supervision, J.T.; project administration, J.T.; funding acquisition, J.T. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by the Department of Health and Aged Care, End of Life
Directions for Aged Care (ELDAC 2020-2023), and by the Specialist Palliative Care and Advance Care
Planning Advisory Services Grant Opportunity (G01992).
Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration
of Helsinki, and ethical approval was obtained from the Flinders University Social and Behavioural
Research Ethics Committee (project number 4652, 3 August 2021, human ethics low-risk panel—
Flinders University).
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in
the study
.
Data Availability Statement: The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because
approval for such disclosure was not part of the participant consent process.
Acknowledgments: We extend our deepest gratitude to the participants of this study for offering
their time and insights for research. Thank you also to Seth Nicholls for his help with the preparation
of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1.
Estabrooks, C.A.; Duan, Y.; Cummings, G.G.; Doupe, M.; Hoben, M.; Keefe, J.; Poss, J.W.; Song, Y.; Squires, J.E.; Wagg, A.; et al.
Changes in Health and Well-Being of Nursing Home Managers from a Prepandemic Baseline in February 2020 to December 2021.
J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2023,24, 148–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Ghezeljeh, T.N.; Shahrestanaki, S.K.; Majdabadi Kohne, Z.A.; Fakhari, E. Home care nurses’ perception of the challenges they
faced during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2022,21, 314. [CrossRef]
3.
Shamon, S.; Gill, A.; Meadows, L.; Kruizinga, J.; Kaasalainen, S.; Pereira, J. Providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term
care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study of clinicians’ lived experiences. CMAJ Open 2023,11, e745–e753.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
Scheepers, R.A.; van den Broek, T.; Cramm, J.M.; Finkenflügel, H.; Nieboer, A.P. Changes in work conditions and well-being
among healthcare professionals in long-term care settings in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal
study. Hum. Resour. Health 2023,21, 59. [CrossRef]
5. Lewis, S.; Willis, K.; Bismark, M.; Smallwood, N. A time for self-care? Frontline health workers’ strategies for managing mental
health during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM Ment. Health 2022,2, 100053. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 11 of 12
6.
Maslach, C.; Leiter, M.P. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World
Psychiatry 2016,15, 103–111. [CrossRef]
7.
Delp, L.; Wallace, S.P.; Geiger-Brown, J.; Muntaner, C. Job Stress and Job Satisfaction: Home Care Workers in a Consumer-Directed
Model of Care. Health Serv. Res. 2010,45, 922–940. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Aged Care Workforce Strategy Taskforce. A Matter of Care: Australia’s Aged Care Workforce Strategy; Aged Care Workforce Strategy
Taskforce: Canberra, Australia, 2018.
9.
Jones, M.T.; Heckenberg, R.A.; Wright, B.J.; Hodgkin, S. Understanding the nature and impact of occupational stress on Australian
rural aged care workers. Health Soc. Care Community 2021,29, 643–653. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Mavromaras, K.; Knight, G.; Isherwood, L.; Crettenden, A.; Flavel, J.; Karmel, T.; Moskos, M.; Smith, L.; Walton, H.; Wei, Z.
The 2016 National Aged Care Census and Survey—The Aged Care Workforce, 2016; Australian Government, Department of Health:
Canberra, Australia, 2017.
11. Palliative Care Australia (PCA). National Palliative Care Standards; Palliative Care Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2018.
12.
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Aged Care and COVID-19: A Special Report; Royal Commission into Aged
Care Quality and Safety: Melbourne, Australia, 2020.
13.
Maben, J.; Bridges, J. COVID-19: Supporting nurses’ psychological and mental health. J. Clin. Nurs. 2020,29, 2742–2750.
[CrossRef]
14.
Shanafelt, T.; Ripp, J.; Trockel, M. Understanding and Addressing Sources of Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals During
the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA 2020,323, 2133–2134. [CrossRef]
15.
Tierney, L.; Doherty, K.; Elliott, K.-E. Distressed, detached, devalued and determined: Aged care workers’ experiences of the
COVID-19 pandemic. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs. 2022,39, 45–53. [CrossRef]
16.
Dijxhoorn, A.Q.; Brom, L.; van der Linden, Y.M.; Leget, C.; Raijmakers, N.J. Prevalence of burnout in healthcare professionals
providing palliative care and the effect of interventions to reduce symptoms: A systematic literature review. Palliat. Med. 2021,35,
6–26. [CrossRef]
17.
Chenoweth, L.; Jeon, Y.-H.; Merlyn, T.; Brodaty, H. A systematic review of what factors attract and retain nurses in aged and
dementia care. J. Clin. Nurs. 2010,19, 156–167. [CrossRef]
18. Boyle, D.A. Countering compassion fatigue: A requisite nursing agenda. Online J. Issues Nurs. 2011,16, 2. [CrossRef]
19.
El-Osta, A.; Webber, D.; Gnani, S.; Banarsee, R.; Mummery, D.; Majeed, A.; Smith, P. The self-care matrix: A unifying framework
for self-care. SelfCare J. 2019,10, 1–17.
20.
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. Aged Care Quality Standards Fact Sheet; Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission:
Canberra, Australia, 2021.
21. Kravits, K.; McAllister-Black, R.; Grant, M.; Kirk, C. Self-care strategies for nurses: A psycho-educational intervention for stress
reduction and the prevention of burnout. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2010,23, 130–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22.
McElligott, D.; Leask Capitulo, K.; Morris, D.L.; Click, E.R. The Effect of a Holistic Program on Health-Promoting Behaviors in
Hospital Registered Nurses. J. Holist. Nurs. 2010,28, 175–183. [CrossRef]
23.
Mackenzie, C.S.; Poulin, P.A.; Seidman-Carlson, R. A brief mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention for nurses and nurse
aides. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2006,19, 105–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24.
Monroe, C.; Loresto, F.; Horton-Deutsch, S.; Kleiner, C.; Eron, K.; Varney, R.; Grimm, S. The value of intentional self-care practices:
The effects of mindfulness on improving job satisfaction, teamwork, and workplace environments. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2021,35,
189–194. [CrossRef]
25. Penque, S. Mindfulness to promote nurses’ well-being. Nurs. Manag. 2019,50, 38–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26.
Alexander, G.K.; Rollins, K.; Walker, D.; Wong, L.; Pennings, J. Yoga for Self-Care and Burnout Prevention Among Nurses.
Workplace Health Saf. 2015,63, 462–470. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27.
Sexton, J.D.; Pennebaker, J.W.; Holzmueller, C.G.; Wu, A.W.; Berenholtz, S.M.; Swoboda, S.M.; Pronovost, P.J.; Sexton, J.B. Care for
the caregiver: Benefits of expressive writing for nurses in the United States. Prog. Palliat. Care 2009,17, 307–312. [CrossRef]
28.
Westermann, C.; Kozak, A.; Harling, M.; Nienhaus, A. Burnout intervention studies for inpatient elderly care nursing staff:
Systematic literature review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2014,51, 63–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Mills, J. Theoretical foundations for self-care practice. Prog. Palliat. Care 2021,29, 183–185. [CrossRef]
30. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 2019,11, 589–597. [CrossRef]
31.
Mills, J.; Ramachenderan, J.; Chapman, M.; Greenland, R.; Agar, M. Prioritising workforce wellbeing and resilience: What
COVID-19 is reminding us about self-care and staff support. Palliat. Med. 2020,34, 1137–1139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32.
Phoenix Australia. Aged Care Workforce. 2020. Available online: https://phoenixaustralia.org/aged-care/aged-care-workforce/
(accessed on 30 October 2023).
33.
Palliative Care Australia (PCA). Self-Care Matters Aged Care. 2023. Available online: https://palliativecare.org.au/resource/
resources-self-care-matters-aged-care/ (accessed on 1 November 2023).
Geriatrics 2025,10, 3 12 of 12
34.
Cameron, F.; Brownie, S. Enhancing resilience in registered aged care nurses. Australas. J. Ageing 2010,29, 66–71. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
35.
Low, Y.S.; Bhar, S.; Chen, W.S. Exploring the relationship between co-worker and supervisor support, self- confidence, coping
skills and burnout in residential aged care staff. BMC Nurs. 2022,21, 135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities reported heavy job demands and a lack of job resources during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, how job demands and resources in these facilities changed during the pandemic, and how possible changes affected professionals’ work-related well-being, remains unclear. Thus, we explored changes in job demands and resources in the face of surging COVID-19 infection rates, and investigated associations of these changes with changes in burnout and work engagement, among healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities in the Netherlands. Methods This longitudinal study was conducted with healthcare professionals working in five long-term care facilities in the Netherlands. Data were collected in early and late 2021, when infection rates in long-term care facilities were low and high (mean, 29.1 and 275.4 infections/day), respectively. In total, 173 healthcare professionals completed the validated Job Demands and Resources Questionnaire, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale at both timepoints. We performed paired-samples t tests to examine changes in job demands and resources, and fixed-effects linear regression analyses to examine associations of within-person changes in job demands and resources with those in burnout and work engagement. Results Healthcare professionals perceived increased workloads, associated with increased burnout and decreased work engagement during the study period. Within-person increases in perceived collegial support were associated positively with work engagement and negatively with burnout symptoms. Conclusions Healthcare professionals in long-term care facilities perceived increased workloads in the wake of surging infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in increased burnout and decreased work engagement. These changes in burnout and work engagement were also perceived in response to declining collegial support. Efforts to protect the work-related well-being of healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities in the pandemic context that focus on workload reduction and the promotion of collegial support may be most beneficial.
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite the significant role they play in the whole health care system, home care nurses are not paid the attention they deserve. Besides highlighting their significant role in the health care system, the COVID-19 pandemic also posed several challenges for home care nurses. Objective The purpose of this study is to explain the nurses’ perception of the challenges of home care during the Covid-19 pandemic. Methods The present study was a qualitative study with a conventional content analysis approach conducted from November 2020 to September 2021. Participants included 16 home care nurses who were purposefully selected based on the eligibility criteria. After obtaining ethical authorization, the data were collected through semi-structured interviews. MAXQDA Version 10 software was used for data mangement. Data analysis was performed using the Granheim and Lundman five-step method. Guba and Lincoln criteria were utilized for trustworthiness. Findings The seven main categories obtained in this study included “the onset of a new chapter: from avoidance to relapse”, “burnout”, “vortex of moral distress”, “social stigma”, “difficulty in breaking the transmission chain”, “care inhibitors related to the patient and family” and “support deficiency: the crisis of home care nursing agencies during the crisis”. Conclusion The results showed that nurses working in home care during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced several challenges in various fields. This study captured the nurses’ perception of the challenges of home care during the Covid-19 pandemic, a period of unprecedented change and difficulty. These challenges included lack of support, psychological problems, and dealing with new experiences. Identifying these challenges can help improve the quality of home care nursing and planning in this area.
Article
Full-text available
Background Staff working in residential aged care facilities face unique challenges and stressors in their workplaces which increase their risk for occupational burnout. Burnout in this workforce results in low job satisfaction, increased levels of absenteeism and poor retention rates. Given Australia’s ageing population and the demand for residential aged care staff, it is imperative to explore predictors of burnout in this cohort in order to help staff prevent and manage burnout. Methods This study examined the extent to which co-worker and supervisor support, self-confidence and adaptive coping skills predicted burnout among residential aged care staff, after controlling for staff demographics, organisational climate and work patterns. One hundred and thirty three residential aged care staff across Australia were surveyed using online questionnaires measuring levels of co-worker and supervisor support, self- confidence, adaptive coping skills and burnout. Results Regression analyses indicated that, overall, co-worker and supervisor support, self-confidence, and adaptive coping predicted each dimension of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment). After controlling for covariates and other predictors: confidence significantly predicted all three dimensions; support significantly predicted emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and adaptive coping significantly predicted emotional exhaustion. Conclusion These findings suggest that co-worker and supervisor support, self- confidence and adaptive coping skills need to be addressed to prevent and manage occupational burnout for residential aged care staff in Australia.
Article
Full-text available
Frontline healthcare workers have experienced detrimental mental health impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic including anxiety, emotional distress, stress, fatigue, and burnout. But little is known about how these healthcare professionals take care of their own mental health in the midst of considerable personal, occupational and social disruption. In this article, we use qualitative data from an Australian national survey to examine the self-care strategies frontline healthcare professionals employed to manage their mental health and wellbeing during the crisis. Findings reveal how healthcare workers sought to adjust to disruption by adopting new self-care practices and mindsets, while encountering numerous personal and professional struggles that undermined their capacity for self-care. Feeling socially connected and valued were critical dimensions of caring for self, illustrating the importance of locating self-care in the social domain. These findings, we argue, highlight the need to expand conceptions of self-care away from those that focus primarily on the individual towards approaches that situate self care as collective and relational.
Article
Background: A disproportionate number of COVID-19-related deaths in Canada occurred in long-term care homes, affecting residents, families and staff alike. This study explored the experiences of long-term care clinicians with respect to providing palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We used a qualitative research approach. Long-term care physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs) in Ontario, Canada, participated in semistructured interviews between August and September of 2021. Interviews were undertaken virtually, and results were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Twelve clinicians (7 physicians and 5 NPs) were interviewed. We identified 5 themes, each with several subthemes: providing a palliative approach to care, increased work demands and changing roles, communication and collaboration, impact of isolation and visitation restrictions, and impact on the providers' personal lives. Clinicians described facing several concurrent challenges, including the uncertainty of COVID-19 illness, staffing and supply shortages, witnessing many deaths, and distress caused by isolation. These resulted in burnout and feelings of moral distress. Previous training and integration of the palliative care approach in the long-term care home, access to resources, increased communication and interprofessional collaboration, and strong leadership mitigated the impact and led to improved palliative care and a sense of pride while facing these challenges. Interpretation: The pandemic had a considerable impact on clinicians caring for residents in long-term care homes at the end of life. It is important to address these lived experiences and use the lessons learned to identify strategies to improve palliative care in long-term care homes and reduce the impact of future pandemics with respect to palliative care.
Article
Objective: To evaluate changes in mental health and well-being (eg, quality of work life, health, intention to leave) among nursing home managers from a February 2020 prepandemic baseline to December 2021 in Alberta, Canada. Design: Repeated cross-sectional survey. Setting and participants: A random sample of nursing homes (n = 35) in urban areas of Alberta was selected on 3 strata (region, size, ownership). Care managers were invited to participate if they (1) managed a unit, (2) worked there for at least 3 months, and (3) worked at least 6 shifts per month. Methods: We measured various mental health and well-being outcomes, including job satisfaction (Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory-exhaustion, cynicism, efficacy), organizational citizenship behaviors (constructive efforts by individuals to implement changes to improve performance), mental and physical health (Short Form-8 Health Survey), burden of worry, and intention to leave. We use mixed effects regression to examine changes at the survey time points, controlling for staffing and resident acuity. Results: The final sample included 181 care managers (87 in the pre-COVID survey; 94 in the COVID survey). Response rates were 66.9% and 82.5% for the pre-COVID and COVID surveys, respectively. In the regression analysis, we found statistically significant negative changes in job satisfaction (mean difference -0.26, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.06; P = .011), cynicism (mean difference 0.43, 95% CI 0.02-0.84; P = .041), exhaustion (mean difference 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.27; P < .001), and SF-8 mental health (mean difference -6.49, 95% CI -9.60 to -3.39; P < .001). Conclusions and implications: Mental health and well-being of nursing home managers worsened during the pandemic, potentially placing them at risk for leaving their jobs and in need of improved support. These findings should be a major concern for policy makers, particularly given serious prepandemic workforce shortages. Ongoing assessment and support of this understudied group are needed.
Article
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread impacts on the community and has demanded a rapid response from the aged care sector. System changes for infection control have been required including the use of personal protective equipment, lockdowns, visitor restrictions and changes to activities within aged care facilities. Even prior to COVID-19, the high physical and emotional demands of aged care work were recognised. Objective: This study sought to understand aged care workers’ experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using a pragmatic paradigm qualitative data about work experiences during COVID-19 was collected from people employed in different aged care organisations in a range of aged care roles and settings from multiple Australian states. Data was collected using focus groups and interviews conducted online between August-October 2020. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes in the data. Results: Participants included 15 people working across a range of aged care roles including clinical, care and management staff and across both residential and community settings. Five themes were identified which characterised aged care workers thoughts about their jobs during the pandemic. These included intensified procedures and emotional demands, feeling undervalued and detached from the frontline, exposure of existing system deficiencies, recognising teamwork and increased confidence in technology. Conclusion: Reflecting on aged care workers’ experiences of COVID-19 highlights the need to better support workers and acknowledge their important role in caring for older Australians. This includes at an organisational level by providing supportive environments and access to online resources as well as at the community and policy level by recognising aged care workers as frontline workers. The COVID-19 pandemic has also highlighted existing systemic issues in the aged care sector that need to be addressed for the provision of quality aged care in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic and into the future. What is already known about the topic? • While the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the global community, it is disproportionately impacting the aged care sector with higher rates of severe illness and death and wide-ranging system changes to prevent and control the spread of the virus. • Prior to COVID-19, aged care work was associated with high job demands and lack of access to resources to support aged care workers in their role. • Survey data on the Australian RACF workforce found workers felt prepared for the pandemic with a wide range of measures to control the spread of COVID-19 but they faced several challenges associated with their additional roles and restrictions. What this paper adds • This paper provides qualitative and descriptive insights into the challenges experienced by the Australian aged care workforce during COVID-19 including increased workloads and intensified emotional demands of their roles while at the same time feeling undervalued by the wider community. • This study has highlighted the need to better support and acknowledge aged care workers in the community through their portrayal in the media and within their organisations by facilitating supportive team environments and providing access to online resources and training. • This paper discusses existing systemic issues that have been highlighted by COVID-19 and the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety and need to be addressed for the wellbeing of workers and the provision of quality aged care.
Article
This study explored the nature and impact of occupational stress on direct‐care workers employed by aged care providers in rural Australia. The Job demands–Resources (JD‐R) model of occupational stress provided the theoretical framework to guide this qualitative investigation. A series of four FGs were conducted with direct‐care workers (n = 23), who reported their job demands, job resources and personal resources. Direct‐care workers identified six themes related to job demands: time pressure, physical demands, hindrance demands, an inadequate mix of staff, insufficient training to deal with complex conditions and work schedule demands. Four themes related to job resources were identified: collaboration with colleagues, equipment, opportunities for development and work schedule control. Disposition and self‐care were identified as necessary personal resources for aged care workers. While the generic JD‐R questionnaire captures many relevant workplace characteristics, further investigations with this work group should also consider the inclusion of items related to shift work, disposition and self‐care.
Article
Background Burnout rates among nurses have detrimental impact on job satisfaction, teamwork, and patient care. This costs millions of dollars in the healthcare system and challenges nurse leaders to address in order to keep up with the healthcare demands. Furthermore, burnout is especially relevant in our current healthcare climate, as frontline nurses have increased workload and multiple psychosocial stressors during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic (Sultana, Sharma, Hossain, Bhattacharya, & Purohit, 2019). Literature also suggests that mindful self-care practices need to be reinforced in order to impact burnout long term (Chamorro-Premuzic & Lusk, 2017). Project7 Mindfulness Pledge© is an accessible and voluntary mindfulness tool that nurses can utilize in their individual practice to reduce burnout and does not require significant time commitment. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of intentional self-care practices on nurse burnout and workplace environment by measuring job satisfaction and teamwork among nurses. Methods Comparisons between inpatient units on data from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) with the Practice Environment Scale (PES), specifically on job enjoyment and teamwork, were done utilizing ANOVA. Results Results show that nurses in an inpatient unit that implemented Project7 has significantly higher job satisfaction as compared to units that did not implement Project7. Conclusions This suggests that this tool provides an effective and accessible mindfulness framework managers and directors can utilize to improve job satisfaction, teamwork, and thereby reduce burnout to create healthier work environments.