ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Over the past 7 decades, researchers have examined the personalities of creative individuals across various fields, including architecture, art, and science, for instance. These studies have highlighted distinct conative and cognitive traits associated with each of these different domains. But what about the creators in relatively unexplored domains such as magic for example? Do magicians present personality traits distinct from those of the general population? In this exploratory study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the personality traits of 60 magicians and 60 nonmagicians assessing the Big Five traits, creative self and narcissism. The findings indicate that magicians score higher on openness, extraversion, agreeableness, creative self, and narcissism compared to nonmagicians. Furthermore, a distinction was made between magicians based on their years of practice. Results indicate that the most experienced magicians scored higher on openness compared to less experienced magicians. In addition, we sought to predict creative self within the entire sample, encompassing both magicians and nonmagicians. The results revealed that openness is the only predictor of creative self. Consequently, this study highlights the significance of openness in the field of magic. Our results could have practical implications, particularly in the implementation of magic-based interventions aimed at developing certain personality traits such as openness.
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Who Are the Magicians? Their Personality Traits
Marion Botella and Cyril Thomas
Online First Publication, December 30, 2024. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000698
CITATION
Botella, M., & Thomas, C. (2024). Who are the magicians? Their personality traits. Psychology of
Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000698
Article
Magic is an art form that creates illusory experiences of impossibility by generating a conflict between what we witness and what we believe about the world. The uniqueness of this art has intrigued researchers for over a century. The present study explores the social representations of magic among magicians and non-magicians to understand how these groups perceive magic. Utilizing the framework of Social Representations (SR), which encompasses shared ideas and beliefs, this research aims to better understand the existence of differentiated perceptions of the same object based on one's relationship and proximity to it. The study involved 424 participants, including magicians and non-magicians, who were asked to list words associated with magic. The hierarchical, descending classification analysis revealed five distinct classes of representations, highlighting differences based on interest and expertise in magic. Magicians view magic positively, emphasizing the emotional exchange with the audience, while non-magicians exhibit varied perspectives, from indifference to fascination, influenced by cognitive conflicts and emotional responses. These findings underline the importance of understanding diverse perceptions to enhance the magical experience and suggest further research into how prior beliefs and representations influence the suspension of disbelief.
Article
Full-text available
Background There is a common perception that creativity is associated with psychopathology. Previous studies have shown that members of creative groups such as comedians, artists and scientists scores higher than the norm on psychotic traits, and scientists in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields score highly on autistic traits. Aims To test whether magicians, a creative group that has not been studied before, also score highly on psychopathological traits and autism, and to test the associations of creative self-efficacy and creative identity with schizotypal and autistic traits among magicians. Method A sample of 195 magicians and 233 people from the general population completed measures of schizotypal traits (Oxford–Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences) and autism (Abridged Version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient), as well as the Short Scale of Creative Self. Magicians were also compared with other creative groups with respect to schizotypal traits, based on previously published data. Results Magicians scored lower than the general population sample on three of the four schizophrenia measures (cognitive disorganisation, introvertive anhedonia and impulsive nonconformity) but did not differ with respect to unusual experiences or autism scores. Magicians scored higher on creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity than the general sample. Magicians’ scores on schizotypal traits were largely lower than those of other creative groups. Originality of magic was positively correlated with unusual experiences (r = 0.208), creative self-efficacy (r = 0.251) and creative identity (r = 0.362). Conclusions This is the first study to show a creative group with lower scores than norms on psychotic traits. The results highlight the unique characteristics of magicians and the possible myriad associations between creativity and mental disorders among creative groups.
Article
Full-text available
Patterns of covariation among personality traits in English-speaking populations can be summarized by the five-factor model (FFM). To assess the cross-cultural generalizability of the FFM, data from studies using 6 translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) were compared with the American factor structure. German, Portuguese, Hebrew, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese samples (N = 7,134) showed similar structures after varimax rotation of 5 factors. When targeted rotations were used, the American factor structure was closely reproduced, even at the level of secondary loadings. Because the samples studied represented highly diverse cultures with languages from 5 distinct language families, these data strongly suggest that personality trait structure is universal.
Article
Full-text available
The greatest achievements often arise from challenging the status quo of what is thought to be possible. These types of achievements require certain beliefs about one’s capabilities, but little has been done to explore the value of imaginal self-efficacy sources. We conceptually argue that a potent source of self-efficacy is an actual mastery experience that is also perceived as impossible. As a result, this experience contains advantages of both imaginal and actual success experiences. In part, this result is due to the conscious awareness of social reactions to a seemingly impossible event. Based on this argument, we created a brief arts-based intervention that involved learning a simple magic trick to create an “imaginal mastery experience” and piloted the intervention by measuring its impact on self-efficacy. Our results suggest that the pilot intervention may have enhanced participants’ personal self-efficacy. Participants overestimated the difficulty of the trick, whereas their confidence in performing it increased. A thematic analysis of how participants perceived their audience’s social reaction revealed that the magic trick involved surprise, curiosity and interest, confusion, and other positive emotions. Psychological theories and directions for future work on developing this pilot intervention are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Misinformation can have a detrimental impact on our beliefs, and it is therefore necessary to understand the cognitive mechanism by which false information is integrated or can be changed. In two experiments, we worked with fake psychic demonstrations, because observers easily adopt the experience as reflecting a « true » psychic event. We manipulated the availability of alternative explanations by providing a general warning that the performer is a magician with no psychic abilities (Experiment 1), or disclosing afterwards how the fake demonstration had been staged (Experiment 2). In experiment 1, witnessing the psychic demonstration significantly increased participants’ psychic beliefs, even though they had been warned. However, providing the alternative explanation about the deceptive method mitigated this effect. In experiment 2, the realization of deception significantly reduced participants’ psychic beliefs directly after the performance, and remained reduced at the one week later.
Article
Full-text available
Aim The study aimed to check how the Big Five personality traits relate to mindfulness levels in FISM World Champions of Magic. Method The participants were champions of magic (N = 50) from 20 countries. International Personality Item Pool Big Five Markers 50 (IPIP-BFM-50) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) were used to measure personality traits and mindfulness, respectively. Results The regression analysis revealed that emotional stability and conscientiousness explained 47% of mindfulness in champion magicians. Conclusion Only two personality traits predicted mindfulness in magicians, which should be interpreted as a preliminary result.
Article
Full-text available
To facilitate our interactions with the surroundings, the human brain sometimes reshapes the situations that it faces in order to simplify them. This phenomenon has been widely studied in the context of reasoning, especially through the attribute substitution error. It has however been given much less attention in the field of perception. Recent research on the bat-and-ball problem suggests that reasoners are able to intuitively detect attribute substitution errors. Using a perceptual illusion drawn from the field of magic, we investigate the extent to which a perceptual form of attribute substitution depends on executive resources and can be detected. We also investigate the relationship between susceptibility to attribute substitution error in the flushtration count illusion and in a French adaptation of the bat-and ball problem. Finally, we investigate the link between the intuitive cognitive style (assessed by the Cognitive Reflection Test) and the susceptibility to the flushtration count illusion. Our results suggest that participants do not detect perceptual attribute substitution error, that this phenomenon could be independent of the executive resources allocated to the task, and could rest on mechanisms distinct from those that produce errors in reasoning. We discuss differences between these two phenomena, and factors that may explain them.
Article
Full-text available
Performing as an illusionist requires having adequate internal and personality resources. They determine the success of stage performance and have an impact on how an individual perceives self, and influence to self-esteem. The aim of the article is to determine how ego-resiliency, self-efficacy and optimism influence self-esteem. A group of 50 top world magicians - World Champions of Magic - took part in research. The participants were surveyed using the Self-Esteem Scale (SES), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER11) and the Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Results showed positive, statistically significant correlations between self-esteem and: self-efficacy, ego-resiliency dimensions and positive life orientation. Moreover, stepwise regression analysis allowed determining predictors of self-esteem, where the strongest one was optimism.
Article
Self-esteem and emotional reactivity may be important personality determinants of human functioning in situations of social exposure. In this study, we compared the levels of these personality variables in a group of professional theater actors and a group of professional illusionists with a control group of participants who were neither actors nor illusionists and had no artistic education. We also examined the correlations between emotional reactivity and self-esteem in the three groups. For emotional reactivity, we found (1) very strong evidence that the level is less for magicians than for controls, (2) substantial evidence that the level is less for magicians than for actors, (3) anecdotal evidence that the level is less for actors than for controls, and (4) decisive evidence that the average score is less for males than for females. For self-esteem, we found (1) anecdotal evidence that the level is higher for magicians than for controls, (2) substantial evidence that there is no difference between actors and magicians, (3) anecdotal evidence against a difference between actors and controls, and (4) anecdotal evidence against a difference between males and females. Based on the entire sample we found a moderate correlation between self-esteem and emotional reactivity (r = -.30, p < 0.001). Our results are compatible with the notion that emotional reactivity – as part of the temperament concept – is a factor influencing the choice of an artistic profession.
Chapter
Based on the multivariate approach, a set of cognitive, conative and emotional characteristics can be identified as the psychological basis of creativity. These characteristics combine in interactive ways to yield varying degrees of creative potential. The large number of existing behavioral science studies permits a rich synthesis of results that point to a set of key intellectual, personality, motivational, and emotional facets that creative people show. The relative importance of these characteristics varies according to the nature of the creative work and the domain of endeavor. This chapter presents an overview of these concepts with illustrative examples.KeywordsMultivariate approachIndividual differencesCognitionConationAffectPersonalityMotivation
Article
The present study aimed to test a model of relationships between the Big-Five personality traits, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Mental Well-Being in a sample of Chinese undergraduate students (N = 248), controlling for gender and age. We found that Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, and Agreeableness were positively associated with Mental Well-Being and Creative Self-Efficacy, and that Neuroticism was negatively associated with both Mental Well-Being and Creative Self-Efficacy, with the effects observed for Extraversion and Neuroticism being non-significant. Creative Self-Efficacy was positively and significantly associated with Mental Well-Being, fully mediated the effect of Openness and partially mediated the effect of Conscientiousness on Mental Well-Being. These results contribute to explain individual differences in personality and Mental Well-Being through the indirect effect of Creative Self-Efficacy, a belief in one's ability to innovatively overcome problems and achieve creative outcomes, supporting a theoretical model integrating Trait Theory and Social-Cognitive Theory. Further implications for theory, research, assessment, and intervention are discussed.