Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Power of Words: Exploring the Role of Psycholinguistics
in Enhancing Communication, Motivation, and Performance
in the Workplace
Yujia Zhu1,a,*
1Sofia University, Palo Alto, USA
a. yujia.zhu@sofia.edu
*corresponding author
Abstract: This study investigates the application of psycholinguistics in workplace
communication, emphasizing its influence on employee motivation, productivity, and
relational dynamics. By exploring the intersection of psycholinguistics and industrial-
organizational psychology, the research highlights how language shapes perception, emotion,
and cognitive processing, directly impacting organizational performance. Drawing on
motivational language theories and framing effects, the study reveals that strategic
communication fosters inclusivity, cooperation, and a supportive culture. Tailored
communication strategies, such as utilizing positive framing and culturally sensitive language,
enhance employee engagement and reduce turnover. Additionally, the integration of
psycholinguistic principles into managerial practices promotes relational energy, satisfaction,
and innovation within diverse cultural contexts. The findings underscore the importance of
investing in communication training to equip leaders with motivational language skills,
enabling organizations to achieve sustainable growth while addressing modern challenges
like diversity and technological advancements. This interdisciplinary approach offers a robust
framework for improving workplace dynamics, combining theoretical insights with practical
strategies for fostering a cohesive and high-performing organizational environment. By
bridging psycholinguistics with industrial-organizational psychology, this study provides
valuable recommendations for leveraging language as a transformative tool to enhance
workplace outcomes.
Keywords: Psycholinguistics, Workplace Communication, Employee Motivation,
Organizational Performance, Industrial-Organizational Psychology.
1. Introduction
Psycholinguistics is an interdisciplinary domain that investigates the psychological mechanisms
involved in language acquisition, understanding, and production. This study investigates the
processing of language in the human mind, emphasizing the influence of emotion on language
processing and its effects on communication, as emotions markedly affect the interpretation and
expression of language [1]. The discipline has progressed to encompass computational
psycholinguistics, which formulates models to correlate linguistic signals with mental representations,
highlighting language understanding via ideas such as surprisal theory and rational probabilistic
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
7
frameworks [2]. Psycholinguistics examines reading comprehension, especially in those with
language impairments, emphasizing the significance of phonological, syntactic, semantic, and
pragmatic processing in the interpretation of written text [3]. The discipline has broadened to include
the neurology of language, encompassing sex differences, aphasia, developmental disorders, and
nonhuman language acquisition to investigate the uniqueness of human language [4]. Moreover,
psycholinguistics examines individual variances, developmental processes, and disorders, contesting
conventional psychometric methodologies by embracing a functionalist viewpoint that perceives
language as arising from various mechanisms without a direct correspondence to function [5]. This
thorough method facilitates a more profound comprehension of language processing among diverse
groups, highlighting the impartial nature of processing differences and the significance of cultural
context in delineating language-related illnesses.
Industrial psychology, or industrial-organizational (I/O) psychology, is a discipline that utilizes
psychological theories and principles in the workplace, emphasizing the comprehension and
enhancement of employee behavior and performance. This discipline addresses multiple facets of the
workplace, encompassing staff selection, training, performance evaluation, motivation, job
satisfaction, and organizational development [6,7]. I/O psychologists utilize research methodologies
to examine workplace dynamics and formulate solutions to improve productivity and employee well-
being [8]. The discipline has progressed to tackle modern challenges including diversity, equity,
inclusion, and the influence of technology on work practices, such as remote work and virtual reality
[7].I/O psychology underscores the significance of ethical practices and compliance with legal norms
in the management of workplace behavior [8]. I/O psychologists seek to harmonize organizational
objectives with employee requirements to cultivate a work environment that promotes individual
satisfaction and organizational achievement [6]. The discipline's holistic approach encompasses the
examination of group dynamics, leadership, communication, and organizational culture, essential for
comprehending and enhancing workplace relationships [7,9]Industrial psychology significantly
contributes to improving the overall efficacy and well-being of organizations and their personnel.
The restricted overlap between psycholinguistics and industrial psychology can be ascribed to
various elements inherent in the historical and theoretical evolution of psycholinguistics.
Psycholinguistics originated at the convergence of linguistics and psychology, concentrating on the
cognitive mechanisms underlying language learning, understanding, and production. This discipline
has been profoundly shaped by the Chomskyan revolution, which highlighted the inherent cognitive
frameworks that govern language utilization, markedly contrasting with the behaviorist paradigms
that prevailed in prior psychological theories [10,11]. The historical discord between linguistics and
psychology, especially after Chomsky's critique of Skinner's behaviorist paradigm, has resulted in a
disjointed relationship in which linguists and psychologists frequently function in isolation, hindering
interdisciplinary cooperation [12,10]. Additionally, psycholinguistics has established specialized
subfields, including neurolinguistics and cognitive psycholinguistics, which concentrate on the
modular and cognitive dimensions of language processing, frequently lacking direct relevance to
industrial contexts [13,11]. Industrial psychology largely addresses workplace behavior and
organizational dynamics, which do not inherently correspond with the fundamental goals of
psycholinguistics, centered on human cognitive processes and language structure [14]. This contrast
in emphasis and historical evolution has led to minimal intersection between the two disciplines, as
they tackle distinct facets of human behavior and cognition.
The strategic application of language and communication styles is crucial for improving
motivation, productivity, and working relationships, as demonstrated by several studies. Managerial
communication styles profoundly affect employee motivation and performance, as clear and
affirmative communication cultivates a motivating work environment that boosts employee
engagement and performance [15]. Effective communication methods, like open-door policies and
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
8
regular team meetings, are essential for cultivating a productive work atmosphere, enhancing
transparency, and establishing trust, hence increasing employee happiness and performance [16].
Moreover, communication strategies that prioritize active listening, constructive feedback, and
empathy are crucial for improving workplace efficiency, collaboration, and conflict resolution [17].
Leadership styles mediate the link between communication styles and job performance, with
aggressive communication notably enhancing work performance and cultivating employee trust and
commitment [18]. Moreover, communication is essential to organizational performance, affecting
collaboration and decision-making; rectifying inadequate communication can mitigate performance
challenges [19]. These findings emphasize the significance of customized communication strategies
and leadership styles in fostering a supportive work environment that improves motivation,
productivity, and workplace relationships. Organizations are urged to invest in communication
training and design methods that correspond with their particular requirements to enhance these
results.
2. Theoretical Concept and Discussions
2.1. Theoretical Framework
The Psycholinguistic principles significantly influence how employees interpret messages in
workplace communication through linguistic clues. According to Mayfield and Mayfield, meaning-
making language is crucial for employee engagement and performance, as it connects personal and
professional values while cultivating a sense of collective purpose [20]. This corresponds with Vine's
investigation of workplace discourse, wherein language serves not just to communicate directions but
also to construct identity and mediate conflict, underscoring the significance of linguistic cues in
quotidian encounters [21]. Kelly underscores the significance of perception and self-concept in
communication, indicating that employees' interpretation of communications is shaped by their self-
concept and the corporate setting, hence influencing their responses [22]. Bonvillain's research on
language and cultural significance emphasizes the influence of cultural and contextual factors on
message interpretation, indicating that linguistic signals are intricately intertwined with cultural
norms and societal frameworks [23]. Tkachenko's psycholinguistic analysis indicates that dialogue
semantics and the cognitive strategies utilized by interlocutors are essential for comprehending
message processing and interpretation, with context, conversational dynamics, and pragmatic
influences being significant factors [24]. These results demonstrate that employees perceive
workplace communications through a complex interaction of linguistic signals, cultural contexts, and
individual cognitive processes, which are crucial for effective communication and meaning-making
in organizational environments.
The framing of language significantly impacts employee perceptions and motivation in workplace
communication by determining how messages are interpreted and responded to. The notion of
framing entails the presentation of information that accentuates specific elements over others, hence
influencing decision-making and behavior. For example, positive framing, which highlights
advantages, can be more compelling than negative framing, which centers on evading disadvantages,
despite the material being fundamentally equal [25]. This is especially pertinent in professional
environments where motivational profiles may be shaped by the framing of messages, as evidenced
by the efficacy of gain framing in encouraging sustainable behaviors such as the selection of electric
automobiles [26]. The interplay between personal motivational forces and situational framing can
yield varying results; for instance, individuals with actual-ought self-discrepancies tend to respond
more favorably to positive outcome frames, whereas those with actual-ideal discrepancies are more
swayed by negative frames [27]. This indicates that comprehending the psychological foundations of
framing might improve persuasive communication tactics inside firms, coinciding with the
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
9
overarching objectives of motivation and persuasion in business communication [20]. Furthermore,
including psycholinguistic concepts into motivational profiling can yield an advanced methodology
for behavioral engineering, facilitating the modification of employee behavior through strategic
communication [28]. Consequently, framing language serves as a potent instrument in workplace
communication, with the potential to profoundly influence employee motivation and perceptions
when utilized judiciously and responsibly.
Language significantly influences motivation by providing reinforcement and feedback, affecting
both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Intrinsic motivation, fueled by internal
gratification and the aspiration for mastery, can be markedly augmented by language that recognizes
accomplishments and offers substantive feedback. This form of motivation is more enduring and
significantly influences employee performance over the long term, since it cultivates a sense of
achievement and personal development [29,30]. Conversely, extrinsic motivation, dependent on
external rewards like bonuses and promotions, can be efficiently bolstered through explicit
communication of expectations and acknowledgment of accomplishments. Language that emphasizes
the advantages of contributing to company aims and society advancement can augment extrinsic
motivation by aligning individual and organizational goals [31,32]. Consistent feedback and
acknowledgment are crucial for sustaining motivation, as they impart a sense of advancement and
worth to personnel inside the firm [32,33]. Moreover, the language employed in feedback must be
positive and encouraging, as it can profoundly affect employees' engagement and task performance
by fostering a sense of value and understanding [30]. The strategic application of language in
reinforcement and feedback systems is essential for harmonizing intrinsic and extrinsic motivators to
enhance employee motivation and performance.
The correlation between leadership communication styles and employee performance is a complex
subject in industrial psychology, with numerous research emphasizing the substantial influence of
leadership language on staff results. The leadership style, which includes communication skills, is a
crucial factor in employee performance, as it affects motivation and job satisfaction. Research by
Qhurani and Ubaidillah indicates that leadership style, communication, and motivation influence
employee performance both collectively and individually, highlighting the significance of good
communication in leadership positions [34]. Arisman asserts that communication skills are an
essential competency in leadership styles, influencing employee performance by improving
motivation [35]. The research conducted by Aesah et al. corroborates this by demonstrating that both
motivation and leadership style have a large and beneficial impact on employee performance,
indicating that good communication is essential to various leadership styles [36]. Putri's research
underscores the significance of interpersonal communication in augmenting employee contentment,
which subsequently enhances performance, suggesting that leadership communication styles that
promote satisfaction can result in superior performance outcomes [37]. These findings correspond
with overarching theoretical frameworks, such as self-determination theory, which posits that
leadership styles that promote autonomy and motivation can improve employee performance [38].
The integration of these studies indicates that leadership communication methods that successfully
motivate and please people are essential for enhancing performance.
2.2. Impact of Language on Employee Motivation
Motivational language is a strategic communication method employed to positively impact attitudes,
behaviors, and performance in businesses. The approach employs inclusive pronouns, affirmations,
and encouragement to cultivate a culture of thoughtful, collaborative communication [39]. This
language is marked by several pragma linguistic tactics, including commendation, thankfulness,
comedy, and audience identification, as illustrated in Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard commencement
address [40]. These tactics frequently include expressive, aggressive, and directive speech acts to
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
10
effectively encourage and inspire audiences [40]. Leaders' utilization of motivating language has been
demonstrated to markedly enhance organizational results, such as work satisfaction, performance,
retention, and innovation [41]. It also lowers absenteeism and turnover intention, but its efficacy may
range across various cultural situations [42]. The Motivational Language Model classifies
communication into prelocutionary (directive), illocutionary (relationship-building), and locutionary
(meaning-making) language, which can be utilized to create training programs aimed at improving
leader communication abilities [43]. Motivational language is an effective instrument for executives
seeking to foster a pleasant and productive company atmosphere.
Deliberate linguistic selections by leaders or managers can markedly augment employees' intrinsic
motivation through the utilization of tactics that correspond with motivating language and authentic
leadership tenets. The Motivational Language Model posits that managers can deploy prelocutionary,
illocutionary, and locutionary language to offer guidance, foster relationships, and establish meaning,
hence enhancing employee performance and motivation [43]. Motivating language has been
demonstrated to reduce absenteeism and turnover intention while enhancing job satisfaction and
performance across many cultural contexts, underscoring its universal relevance [42]. Moreover,
authentic leadership, defined by sincere and open communication, indirectly enhances intrinsic
motivation by fulfilling employees' fundamental psychological needs; yet, it must be moderated to
prevent possible negative consequences such as frustration or fatigue [44]. Empowering leadership,
characterized by the dissemination of direction and provision of assistance, augments intrinsic
motivation by cultivating psychological empowerment, encompassing emotions of competence and
self-determination [45]. Effective and affirmative communication, together with constructive
criticism, is essential for fostering a stimulating workplace, since it immediately impacts employees'
views on their motivation and performance [15]. These studies collectively emphasize the
significance of deliberate linguistic selections in leadership to cultivate a stimulating and engaging
work environment.
Utilizing positive and detailed language in feedback is essential for improving employee
engagement by cultivating a supportive and constructive workplace atmosphere. Research
demonstrates that positively delivered feedback can markedly enhance employee engagement and
diminish workplace cynicism, fostering a mutually reinforcing upward spiral effect [46]. Positive
feedback not only recognizes employees' contributions but also fosters a growth mentality, which is
crucial for ongoing progress and productivity [47]. Furthermore, the implementation of appreciative
inquiry, which emphasizes recognizing and enhancing effective practices within an organization,
significantly boosts engagement by aligning employees with a common vision and mission, thereby
promoting organizational transformation with minimal resistance [48]. Furthermore, feedback
utilizing positive affective language has been demonstrated to enhance emotional responses, mitigate
frustration, and improve work quality, as evidenced by an online experiment in which participants
reacted more favorably to critiques framed in positive language [49]. This indicates that the tone of
feedback is as crucial as its substance, with affirmative language resulting in enhanced receptivity
and improved job outcomes. Consequently, using affirmative and precise language into feedback
mechanisms not only improves employee engagement but also fosters a more efficient and cohesive
work environment.
Psycholinguistic ways for providing constructive feedback that fosters growth and learning
underscore the significance of timely, detailed, and culturally sensitive communication. Effective
feedback must be individualized and offer a definitive action plan for enhancement, as evidenced by
the experiences of graduate online learners who favored comprehensive and regular interaction with
instructors [50]. The application of three guiding inquiries—"Where am I heading?" How am I faring?
The inquiry "Where to next?" can effectively organize feedback at the task, process, and self-
regulation levels, hence improving student performance and self-regulation [51]. Moreover, feedback
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
11
must be polite and culturally attuned, assisting students in developing new abilities and suitable
behaviors, which is essential for promoting self-determination [52]. In nursing education,
constructive feedback is crucial for professional development and can reduce incivility when
communicated correctly. Strategies encompass fostering a supportive student-teacher rapport and
employing communication methods that facilitate the provision of constructive criticism [51].
Multisite study in nursing education highlights the significance of feedback in professional
development, collaboration, and patient safety, indicating that students view feedback as a chance for
self-enhancement when presented positively [53]. These tactics emphasize the necessity for feedback
to be prompt, corrective, and purpose-driven, ensuring it acts as a catalyst for learning and
development in educational settings.
Organizations that successfully utilize motivational language to enhance morale and motivation
frequently implement a blend of rhetorical tools and customized motivating techniques. Hrvatski
Telekom illustrates the utilization of motivational tactics by comprehending employee behavior and
preferences, enabling the implementation of tailored motivating techniques that improve employee
happiness and retention [54]. A worldwide study indicates that the application of motivating language
substantially reduces absenteeism and turnover intention, while enhancing job satisfaction and
performance across many cultural contexts, including India, the USA, and Vietnam [42]. This
corresponds with the motivating language hypothesis, which underscores the significance of
communication in improving employee results. Moreover, the rhetorical strategy for motivation,
utilizing Aristotle's appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos, can effectively engage employees' emotions
and logic, resulting in enhanced productivity [55]. Organizations that emphasize motivational tactics,
encompassing financial and non-monetary incentives, coaching, and flexible work arrangements,
build an atmosphere in which people perceive their worth and are inspired to excel [56]. These
techniques not only attract high-caliber recruits but also promote the retention of current personnel,
hence enhancing the organization's long-term success [57]. The incorporation of motivating language
and tailored motivational methods is essential for organizations seeking to improve employee morale
and motivation.
2.3. Psycholinguistics and Workplace Relationships
Utilizing inclusive and compassionate language is essential for cultivating a collaborative workplace
culture, as it directly impacts equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) initiatives within firms.
Language functions as a mechanism for implementing inclusive leadership and preventing the
marginalization of individuals and groups in workplace interactions [58]. The growing variety in
workgroups requires an inclusive strategy that honors varied perspectives and promotes adaptability
and collaboration, attainable through the enhancement of cultural intelligence (CQ). Cultural
intelligence (CQ) allows individuals to recognize cultural differences, modify their viewpoints, and
interact empathetically with varied coworkers [59]. In healthcare companies, leaders are urged to
engage in allyship and eliminate oppressive practices by communicative activities across several
organizational levels, therefore fostering inclusivity [60]. Effective communication in the workplace
is crucial for fostering interpersonal relationships and managing diversity, hence enhancing overall
workplace health [61]. Empathetic leadership improves workplace outcomes by fostering an inclusive
environment, as evidenced by research on female educators, which indicated that this leadership style
heightened engagement and inclusivity [62]. Consequently, inclusive and compassionate language
not only bolsters EDI activities but also improves cooperation, engagement, and overall
organizational efficacy.
The selection of language in dispute resolution profoundly influences both the results and the
enduring dynamics of workplace relationships. Effective communication, especially rhetorical
communication, is essential for resolving interpersonal issues and promoting effective business
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
12
environments. Rhetorical communication, based on Aristotelian principles, fosters mutually
beneficial outcomes and promotes healthy interpersonal relationships by prioritizing persuasion and
comprehension, essential in varied organizational contexts [63]. The differentiation between
competitive and cooperative language is crucial in conflict resolution. Cooperative language, defined
by suggestions, agreements, and displays of trust, fosters settlement and mutual advantage, while
competitive language, characterized by personal assaults and unreasonable demands, frequently
results in conflict escalation [64]. The selection of language can either mitigate or intensify conflicts,
as demonstrated in the Anglophone issue in Cameroon, where inadequate communication techniques
and detrimental vocabulary choices have heightened tensions instead of alleviating them [65].
Furthermore, the relational dimension of language, which encompasses the establishment of trust and
rapport, is crucial for the management of long-term relationships in professional environments. This
relational language facilitates the management of connections and interdependence, essential for
sustaining healthy workplace relationships [64]. Consequently, comprehending and strategically
utilizing language in conflict scenarios can result in more effective conflict resolution and enhanced
workplace relationships.
Culturally informed language habits are essential in various workplaces to avert
misunderstandings and promote inclusivity, as they facilitate successful communication and
collaboration among employees from different cultural backgrounds. Cross-cultural competence
(CCC) is vital for fostering inclusive settings that value variety and enhance understanding, attainable
through cultural awareness training and the cultivation of cultural sensitivity within organizational
cultures [66]. Managing cultural diversity entails formulating strategies and regulations that honor
diverse cultural backgrounds, so fostering creativity, innovation, and productivity while mitigating
biases and disputes [67]. Effective interpersonal communication, supported by cultural competency,
is essential for relationship development, job satisfaction, and organizational success, as it facilitates
the bridging of cultural divides and encourages constructive actions [68]. In international company
contexts, comprehending and directing a varied workforce through proficient cross-cultural
communication is crucial to prevent complications with employee relations and organizational
policies [69]. Furthermore, cultural awareness is essential to mitigate discrimination and avert cultural
misunderstandings that may jeopardize an organization's reputation and viability [70]. Organizations
can enhance collaboration and achieve success by employing inclusive communication strategies,
including multilingualism and cross-cultural training, to promote meaningful interactions and
cultivate an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding [66,69].
2.4. Psycholinguistics Strategies for Enhancing Workplace Outcomes
Integrating psycholinguistic insights into workplace practices entails utilizing motivating language
and effective communication methods to improve leadership, employee motivation, and performance.
The Motivating Language Theory (MLT), articulated by Mayfield and associates, underscores the
importance of direction-giving, empathetic, and culturally explanatory language employed by leaders
to markedly enhance organizational outcomes, including performance, job satisfaction, and
innovation [41,71]. Holmes enhances this methodology by incorporating the Four-Frames model,
which offers a systematic framework for leaders to utilize motivational language effectively, hence
improving clarity and execution in tackling organizational difficulties [72]. Singh et al. emphasize
the essential function of motivating language in augmenting employee performance, specifically by
fostering organizational citizenship behavior and employee engagement, which are crucial in high-
stress settings such as healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic [73]. Balakrishnan et al. emphasize
the significance of communication styles, asserting that forceful communication and comprehension
of individual team members' requirements are essential for cultivating trust, dedication, and enhanced
work performance [18]. Collectively, these insights propose a robust framework for leaders and HR
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
13
professionals: instruction in motivational language, incorporation of organized communication
models such as the Four-Frames, and promotion of assertive communication styles to improve
employee engagement and organizational results. This strategy not only tackles immediate
performance indicators but also establishes a basis for sustained organizational development and
employee contentment.
Leaders and teams can adopt several concrete measures, drawn from the synthesis of the offered
academic studies, to adapt language-based methods for enhanced workplace dynamics. Integrating
workplace rhetoric as a behavioral engineering technique can substantially improve business culture
by encouraging employees and cultivating a supportive work environment. This entails integrating
rhetorical approaches into leadership initiatives and implementing training programs to improve
rhetorical skills throughout all organizational tiers [74]. Moreover, good communication strategies,
including the establishment of clear channels, the encouragement of active listening, and the provision
of constructive feedback, are essential. These behaviors boost productivity while promoting team
collaboration and conflict resolution [17]. Motivational language, encompassing directive,
sympathetic, and meaning-conveying speech acts, serves as a potent instrument for leaders. Educating
leaders in the application of motivational language can enhance organizational results, including
performance, retention, and job satisfaction [41,75]. Moreover, embracing the seven new workplace
"languages" can revolutionize communication and culture by uncovering fundamental emotions and
motives, so directing individual and collective energy towards organizational transformation [76]. By
employing these tactics, firms can cultivate a more innovative, adaptable, and cooperative culture,
hence fostering improved workplace dynamics and growth.
Empirical studies on psycholinguistic interventions in the workplace can gain from assessing the
efficacy of diverse psychosocial and digital strategies, as emphasized in the referenced articles.
Digital interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy and stress-management programs, have
demonstrated potential in enhancing psychological well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms
among employees, although the strength of evidence varies based on the intervention's theoretical
foundation [77]. Moreover, the economic ramifications of psychological therapies might be
considerable, since meta-analyses and utility studies have shown notable enhancements in job
performance and worker productivity stemming from both selection and non-selection interventions
[78]. Organizational-level interventions, albeit less commonly examined than individual-level
interventions, are posited to be more efficacious as preventative strategies, potentially enhancing
health via psychological mechanisms [79]. The Karasek demand-latitude-support model and the
Siegrist effort-reward imbalance model are theoretical frameworks utilized to evaluate psychosocial
work factors. Interventions addressing these factors have demonstrated potential in mitigating adverse
outcomes and enhancing health, although comprehensive documentation and long-term follow-up are
frequently insufficient [80]. Effective psychosocial workplace interventions have been linked to
enhancements in psychosocial work variables and health outcomes, indicating that well-structured
interventions may yield substantial health advantages [81]. Subsequent research should concentrate
on the execution and contextual elements affecting the efficacy of these interventions, along with
their economic ramifications, to furnish a thorough comprehension of their influence on workplace
results.
3. Conclusion
The impact of language on motivation, productivity, and interpersonal interactions in the workplace
is significant, as demonstrated by several studies. Motivating language, a key notion in these debates,
greatly improves organizational outcomes including performance, retention, attendance, innovation,
and work happiness [41]. It exhibits a positive correlation with relational energy and in-role
performance, with relational energy serving as a mediator in this relationship [82]. Moreover,
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
14
encouraging language reduces employee absenteeism and turnover intention while enhancing job
satisfaction and performance across several cultural contexts, including India, the USA, and Vietnam
[42]. The efficacy of motivating language differs between cultures, with Eastern cultures exhibiting
more significant enhancements in job performance, while Western cultures see larger advantages in
employee retention [42]. Effective managerial communication styles, especially those that are
straightforward, affirmative, and constructive, are essential for cultivating a motivating work
environment, hence improving employee engagement and performance [15]. The findings indicate
that firms ought to spend in educating leaders to utilize motivational language effectively, as it can
significantly enhance key organizational outcomes [41]. The strategic employment of language by
managers is a potent instrument that can profoundly affect motivation, productivity, and workplace
relationships, highlighting the necessity for deliberate communication strategies in organizational
contexts [39,15].
Implementing psycholinguistic tactics at various organizational levels can provide multiple
advantages, improving communication, negotiation, and the overall company culture. Neurolinguistic
programming (NLP) is an approach that assists managers in resolving labor problems by enhancing
communication and negotiation, hence promoting harmonious labor relations and competitive
negotiations without undermining agreements [83]. Organizational psycholinguistics, emphasizing
professional communication, can alter a partner's psychological state to facilitate cooperative
activities, hence enhancing collaboration and communication inside organizations [84]. The
examination of management culture using psycholinguistic instruments, including frequency analysis
of lemmas and n-grams, can yield insights into the linguacultural dynamics within an organization,
facilitating the comprehension and improvement of internal speech and managerial approaches [85].
The dissemination of motivating language (ML) throughout organizational tiers is associated with
favorable employee outcomes, including enhanced job performance and satisfaction, as well as
diminished attrition and absenteeism. This indicates that strategic communication can profoundly
influence organizational effectiveness [86]. Ultimately, the application of psycholinguistic principles
to digital communication, including website design, can enhance user engagement and satisfaction
by optimizing language complexity and frequency, illustrating the wider relevance of these strategies
beyond conventional organizational contexts [87]. These tactics can collectively foster a more
cohesive, efficient, and adaptive organizational environment.
The efficacy of language as a catalyst for positive transformation in professional settings is widely
acknowledged, however it continues to be a domain warranting additional investigation. Language
significantly impacts workplace dynamics, affecting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI)
initiatives, along with organizational transformation. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) can be
utilized to elucidate power dynamics within professional discourse, demonstrating how language can
legitimize processes and affect power hierarchies, as evidenced in the examination of counseling
policy documents [88]. In professional environments, language is essential for implementing
inclusive leadership and fostering linguistic inclusion, which can avert marginalization and enhance
equity [58]. Effective communication, incorporating narratives, metaphors, and principles, has
demonstrated the ability to cultivate socio-cognitive practices essential for organizational
transformation, hence increasing emotional investment, trust, and commitment among employees
[89]. Furthermore, the physical and psychological dimensions of office environments, when
harmonized with principles of positive psychology, can enhance inventive and collaborative cultures,
indicating that language and environment together facilitate cultural transformation [90].
Notwithstanding these findings, further empirical research is required to investigate the intricate
methods by which language can be utilized to effectuate enduring good change in various job
environments [91]. This research may offer significant techniques for managers to adeptly utilize
language to coordinate strategic intent and promote organizational transformation [89].
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
15
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful for the academic tools and research that have inspired this study. My profound
gratitude extends to my family for their steadfast support and encouragement during this journey.
Your confidence in my work has been a wellspring of strength and motivation.
References
[1] Irgasheva, Madina, Irgashovna. (2024). Psycholinguistics: “examining the role of emotion in language processing
and its impact on communication”. International Journal Of Literature And Languages, doi: 10.37547/ijll/
volume04issue04-03
[2] Gori, M., Precioso, F., & Trentin, E. (2023). Deep Learning. In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 301–349).
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755610.012
[3] Nelita, Indah, Islami., Andoyo, Sastromiharjo., Khaerudin, Kurniawan., Fina, Ainun, Najib. (2024). Literature
Review on Psycholinguistic Processes in Reading Comprehension Mechanisms in Individuals with Language
Disorders. The eurasia proceedings of educational & social sciences, doi: 10.55549/epess.787
[4] Besse, Darmawati. (2022).PSYCHOLINGUISTICS: A comprehensive review. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/me97t
[5] Bob, McMurray., S., Colby., J., Bruce, Tomblin. (2023). Understanding language processing in variable
populations on their own terms: Towards a functionalist psycholinguistics of individual differences, development,
and disorders. Applied Psycholinguistics, doi: 10.1017/s0142716423000255
[6] Mohiuddin, M. (2023). Evaluation of Organizational Psychology using GRA Method. Trends in Finance and
Economics, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.46632/tfe/1/1/2
[7] Ronald, E., Riggio. (2022). Introduction to Industrial/organizational psychology. doi:10.4324/9781315620589
[8] Dean, Stalnaker. (2018). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Humans and Organizations. Social Science
Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.3271653
[9] Donald, M., Truxillo., Talya, N., Bauer., Berrin, Erdogan. (2016). Psychology and Work: Perspectives on Industrial
and Organizational Psychology.
[10] Helen, S., Cairns., Charles, E., Cains. (2017). Linguistic and psycholinguistics twelve years after Chomsky’s
review of Skinner’s verbal behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, doi: 10.30849/RIP/IJP.V5I1
[11] David, Stuart, Palermo., Wilson., Hakan, Aydogan. (1978). Psychology of Language.
[12] Robert, N., McCauley. (1987).The not so happy story of the marriage of linguistics and psychology or why
linguistics has discouraged psychology's recent advances. Synthese, doi: 10.1007/BF00413751
[13] Pierre, Villiard., Jean-Luc, Nespoulous. (1989). Théorie neuropsycholinguistique... Limites. Langages, doi: 10.
3406/LGGE.1989.1556
[14] Olusegun, Emmanuel, Afolabi., Tetyana, Andriyenko., Svitlana, Buchatska., Javad, Ahmadi, Fatalaki., Runhan,
Zhang., Melisa, Grabovac., Oleksandr, Kapranov., V., Kavitha., Padmasani, Kannan., Oleksandr, Kholod., Larysa,
Makaruk., Зоряна, Мацюк., Марія, Фенько., Taras, Shmiher., Shafinaz, Sikder., Valentyna, Ushchyna., Olena,
Zarichna. (2017). East European Journal Of Psycholinguistics.
[15] Bayu, Ade, Prabowo., Shella, Gherina, Saptiany. (2024). Exploration Of Managerial Communication Styles And
Employees' Perceptions Of Motivation And Performance. LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social,
Education, Humanities, doi: 10.56910/literacy.v3i1.1396
[16] Igbokwe, Philomena, Ify. (2024). Communication Strategies And Employee Productivity. Global Journal of Social
Sciences, doi: 10.4314/gjss.v23i1.8
[17] I.Ilavarasi. (2024). Enhancing Workplace Productivity: A Review of Effective Communication Techniques and
Their Role in Fostering Team Collaboration and Conflict Resolution. doi: 10.61877/ijmrp.v2i4.132
[18] Kavitha, Balakrishnan., Ajitha, Angusamy., Riya, Gunvantrai, Patil., Muhammad, Nur, Fitri, Razak. (2024).
Enhancing Work Performance: The Role of Communication and Leadership Styles. doi: 10.17576/jkmjc-2024-
4001-21
[19] Nur, Yasmeen, Zulkeifli., Mohamad, Hafifi, Jamri., Abdul, Rauf, Ridzuan., Nurzali, Ismail., Khairil, Hariss,
Khairuddin., Nur, Shazana, Abdul, Rani., Siti, Nur, Izyandiyana, Ab, Hadi., Noor, Afzaliza, Nazira, Ibrahim. (2023).
Communication as a Strategy in Enhancing an Organization Performance. International journal of academic
research in business & social sciences, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i10/19123
[20] Jacqueline, Mayfield., Milton, Mayfield. (2018). Fitting into the Big Picture: Meaning-Making Language. doi: 10.
1007/978-3-319-66930-4_3
[21] Bernadette, Vine. (2020). Introducing Language in the Workplace. doi: 10.1017/9781108689984
[22] Marylin, S., Kelly. (2005). Communication @ Work: Ethical, Effective, and Expressive Communication in the
Workplace.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
16
[23] Nancy, Bonvillain. (1992). Language, Culture, and Communication: The Meaning of Messages.
[24] Nataliya, Tkachenko. (2023). Psycholinguistic analysis of communication. Problemi semantiki, pragmatiki ta
kognìtivnoï lìngvìstiki, doi: 10.17721/2663-6530.2023.43.05
[25] Adam, Corner., Ulrike, Hahn. (2010). Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Persuasive Success.
Argumentation, doi: 10.1007/S10503-009-9159-6
[26] Leonie, Decrinis., Wolfgang, Freibichler., Micha, Kaiser., Cass, R., Sunstein., Lucia, A., Reisch. (2023). Sustainable
behaviour at work: How message framing encourages employees to choose electric vehicles. Business Strategy and
The Environment, doi: 10.1002/bse.3441
[27] Orit, Tykocinskl., E., Tory, Higgins., Shelly, Chaiken. (1994). Message Framing, Self-Discrepancies, and Yielding
to Persuasive Messages: The Motivational Significance of Psychological Situations. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/0146167294201011
[28] Joseph, Yeager., Linda, Sommer. (2015). How Linguistic Frames Affect Motivational Profiles and the Roles of
Quantitative versus Qualitative Research Strategies. The Qualitative Report, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1838
[29] Subhasish, Chatterjee. (2018). Intrinsic motivation is more significant than extrinsic motivation (with special
reference to present industrial scenario).
[30] Arooj, Makki., Momina, Abid. (2017). Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Employee’s Task
Performance. Asian Social Science, doi: 10.5430/SASS.V4N1P38
[31] Anyibuofu, Anthony, Kifordu. (2023). The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Workers’ Productivity:
Empirical Evidence from the Construction Industry. Global journal of human resource management, doi: 10.
37745/gjhrm.2013/vol11n296112
[32] Ani, Smriti., Mukesh, Kumar. (2024). Impact of motivation in the workplace. doi: 10.58532/v3bhma19p5ch1
[33] B., Sutha., S., Viji., G.E, Barkavi., Abirami, Ravi., R., Hema, Pooja, Valli., M., Pradeep. (2023). Impact of Intrinsic
and Extrinsic Motivators on Employee Performance on Employee Engagement. doi: 10.1109/iccams60113.2023.
10525831
[34] Yasin, Qholbu, Qhurani., Hasan, Ubaidillah. (2023). The Influence of Leadership Style, Communication and
Motivation on Employee Performance. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, doi: 10.21070/ijler.v18i0.
854
[35] Arisman. (2022). The Effect of Leadership Style and Motivation on Employee Performance. Jurnal Multidisiplin
Madani, doi: 10.55927/mudima.v2i5.388
[36] Siti, Aesah., Endang, Suprapti., Sri, Purni, Hernawati. (2023). The Influence of Work Motivation and Leadership
Style on Employee Performance. doi: 10.54099/ijibr.v2i2.679
[37] Rifqi, Amri, Putri. (2018). Leadership Style and Interpersonal Communication of Employee Satisfaction and It’s
Effect on The Employee Performance. doi: 10.17977/UM003V4I32018P108
[38] Van Den Broeck, A., & Slemp, G. R. (2023). Leadership. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 920–938). https:/
/doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197600047.013.47
[39] Jacqueline, Mayfield., Milton, Mayfield. (2018). Clarity Is Key: Direction-Giving Language. doi: 10.1007/978-
3-319-66930-4_5
[40] Yelena, Yerznkyan., Lusine, S., Harutyunyan. (2024). A pragmalinguistic study of the strategies in motivational
discourse (Based on Mark Zuckerberg’s Harvard commencement speech). International journal of English
language and literature studies, doi: 10.55493/5019.v13i2.4982
[41] Jacqueline, Mayfield. (2008). Motivating language: a meaningful guide for leader communications.
Development and Learning in Organizations, doi: 10.1108/14777280910924054
[42] Cau, Ngoc, Nguyen., Wei, Ning., Albi, Alikaj., Quoc, Nam, Tran. (2020). Motivating language and employee
outcomes: a multinational investigation. Management Research Review, doi: 10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0071
[43] N., Rana. (1999). Communicative practices in organizations : A motivational language perspective.
[44] Lucas, A, Maunz., Sascha, B., Thal., Jürgen, Glaser. (2024). Authentic leaders, energized employees? Indirect
beneficial and adverse effects of authentic leadership on intrinsic motivation and exhaustion. Applied Psychology,
doi: 10.1111/apps.12546
[45] Khaidir, Syahrul. (2020). The effect of empowering leadership on intrinsic motivation: the role of psychological
empowerment as a mediation. doi: 10.22146/JLO.56135
[46] James, B., Abugre., S., Sarwar. (2013). Does provision of Feedback increase Work Engagement and Reduce
Cynicism Among Employees.
[47] Siddharth, Bhattacharya. (2023). Building a Culture of Feedback: The Key to Unlocking Employee
Engagement. International journal of science and research, doi: 10.21275/sr23402222346
[48] Shravana, Bardhan. (2020). 4. Engaging Employees With Positivity: The Role of Appreciative Inquiry in Employee
Sustainability. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9675-2.CH012
[49] Thi, Thao, Duyen, T., Nguyen., Thomas, Garncarz., Felicia, Y., Ng., Laura, Dabbish., Steven, Dow. (2017). Fruitful
Feedback: Positive Affective Language and Source Anonymity Improve Critique Reception and Work Outcomes.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
17
[50] Yaser, Sedek, Rezk. (2022). Promoting students' learning through constructive feedback strategies. doi: 10.17760/
d20409202
[51] Gerry, Altmiller. (2016). Strategies for Providing Constructive Feedback to Students.. Nurse Educator, doi: 10.
1097/NNE.0000000000000227
[52] Pennington, R., Tapp, M., & Enriquez, J. S. (2022). Provide Positive and Constructive Feedback to Guide Students’
Learning and Behavior. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 95–106). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003175735-9
[53] Gerry, Altmiller., Belinda, Deal., Nancy, W, Ebersole., Randi, Flexner., Janet, Jordan., Vicki, Jowell., Tommie,
Norris., Mary, Jo, Risetter., Monika, S., Schuler., Kathleen, Szymanski., Beth, Vottero., Danielle, Walker. (2018).
Constructive Feedback Teaching Strategy: A Multisite Study of Its Effectiveness. Nursing education perspectives,
doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000385
[54] Aleksandar, Erceg., Antea, Šuljug. (2016). How corporations motivate their employees – hrvatski telekom
example. doi: 10.25234/PV/4941
[55] D., Madhavilatha, Murthy., Madhumita, Ghosal. (2018). A Study on a Rhetorical Approach to Effective Employee
Motivation at Industries. International journal of engineering research and technology
[56] Raluca, Pârjoleanu. (2020). Work Motivation Efficiency in the Workplace. Postmodern Openings, doi: 10.18662/
PO/11.4/236
[57] Marina, Băieşu., Angela, Boguș. (2024). Effective Employee Motivation Strategies. doi: 10.53486/cike2023.35
[58] Esen, Özdoğan. (2022). 2. Language in the workplace. doi: 10.4324/9781003045571-20
[59] Valerie, Alexandra. (2022). Cultural Intelligence and Workplace Inclusion. Proceedings - Academy of Management,
doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.15305abstract
[60] Robert, J., Razzante., Al, Waqqas, Al, Balushi. (2023). Collaborative and Inclusive Leadership. doi: 10.4324/
9781003333746-22
[61] S., Mo, Jang. (2022). Workplace Communication. doi: 10.4324/9780429318948
[62] Tufail, M. S., & Sandhu, M. A. (2022). Empathetic Leadership and Follower Workplace Engagement: Mediating
Role of Climate for Inclusion. Review of Education Administration and Law, 5(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.
47067/real.v5i3.233
[63] Mitashree, Tripathy. (2021). Rhetoric Communication to Handle Interpersonal Conflicts at Workplaces. doi: 10.
5772/INTECHOPEN.95526
[64] Paul, J., Taylor. (2014). The Role of Language in Conflict and Conflict Resolution. doi: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/
9780199838639.013.012
[65] Nkwetisama, Carlous, Muluh., Nengi, Nduh, Peng, Mary, Solange. (2022). Language and Communication
Discourses in Conflict Management: A Case Study of the Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon. Asian journal of
education and social studies, doi: 10.9734/ajess/2022/v32i130760
[66] Patricia, Diane, Mouboua., Fadeke, Adeola, Atobatele., Olateju, Temitope, Akintayo. (2024). Cross-cultural
competence in global HRD: Strategies for developing an inclusive and diverse workforce. International Journal of
Science and Research Archive, doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.1.0765
[67] Sali, P. P. D. C. P. N. R. A. (2023). Managing Cultural Diversity at Workplace: An Exploratory study. European
Economic Letters (EEL). https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v13i3.213
[68] Geraldine, E., Hynes. (2022). Interpersonal Communication in the Diverse Workplace. doi: 10.4324/
9781003335177
[69] Pavol, Sahadevan., Mukthy, Sumangala. (2021). Effective Cross-Cultural Communication for International
Business. Management Science, doi: 10.34293/MANAGEMENT.V8I4.3813
[70] Doirean, Wilson. (2019). Promoting Cultural Awareness: A Means of Managing Global Diversity. doi: 10.1007/
978-3-030-19523-6_14
[71] Jacqueline, Mayfield., Milton, Mayfield., Jerry, M., Kopf. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on
subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199823/
24)37:3/4<235::AID-HRM6>3.0.CO;2-X
[72] William, T., Holmes. (2024). The four frames of leadership and motivating language theory: Version 2.0.
Development and Learning in Organizations, doi: 10.1108/dlo-01-2024-0016
[73] Sovia, R.J., Singh., Kulwant, Kumar, Sharma., Amit, Mittal., Pawan, Kumar, Chand. (2022). Effect of motivating
language on employee performance: mediating role of organisational citizenship behaviour and employee
engagement in the healthcare sector. Global knowledge, memory and communication, doi: 10.1108/gkmc-07-
2022-0157
[74] Theresa, Ewuzie., Benjamin, Obong. (2024). Workplace Rhetoric and Behaviour Engineering for Enhanced
Corporate Culture. doi: 10.2118/221727-ms
[75] Jacqueline, Mayfield., Milton, Mayfield. (1995). Learning the Language of Leadership: A Proposed Agenda for
Leader Training. Journal of Leadership Studies, doi: 10.1177/107179199500200111
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
18
[76] Robert, Kegan., Lisa, Laskow, Lahey. (2000). How the Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Work: Seven
Languages for Transformation.
[77] Maria, Armaou., Evangelia, Araviaki., Snigdha, Dutta., Stathis, Th., Konstantinidis., Holly, Blake.(2022).
Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Deficit-Oriented and Asset-Oriented Psychological Outcomes in the
Workplace: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology
and Education, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12100102
[78] John, E., Hunter., Frank, L., Schmidt. (1983). Quantifying the effects of psychological interventions on employee
job performance and work-force productivity. American Psychologist, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.473
[79] Matt, Egan.(2013).Psychosocial Interventions and Salutogenic Organizations: Systematic Review Evidence of
Theory, Context, Implementation and Outcome. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6470-5_2
[80] Mahée, Gilbert-Ouimet., Chantal, Brisson., Michel, Vézina., Louis, Trudel., Renée, Bourbonnais., Benoît, Masse.,
Geneviève, Baril-Gingras., Clermont, E., Dionne. (2011). Intervention Study on Psychosocial Work Factors and
Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Outcomes. doi: 10.12927/HCPAP.2011.22410
[81] Chantal, Brisson., Mahée, Gilbert-Ouimet., Caroline, Duchaine., Xavier, Trudel., Michel, Vézina. (2016).
Workplace Interventions Aiming to Improve Psychosocial Work Factors and Related Health. doi: 10.1007/978-3-
319-32937-6_15
[82] Md, Karim, Rabiul., IM, Panha. (2024). Motivating language and relational energy to performance:
workload as moderator. Anatolia an international journal of tourism and hospitality, doi: 10.1080/13032917.
2024.2341318
[83] Edith, Torres, Amaya. (2010). La programación neurolingüística como herramienta estrategica para el gerente
negociador en la resolucion de los conflictos laborales.
[84] Sergei, V., Myskin. (2021). Introduction to Organizational Psycholinguistics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
doi: 10.1007/S10936-021-09785-0
[85] Vitalii, Shymko. (2022). Psycholinguistics of Organizational Phenomena: A Case of the Managerial Culture Study.
Psiholìngvìstika, doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2022-31-1-173-186
[86] Jacqueline, Mayfield., Milton, Mayfield. (2019). The Diffusion Process of Strategic Motivating Language: An
Examination of the Internal Organizational Environment and Emergent Properties:. International journal of
business communication, doi: 10.1177/2329488416629093
[87] Kate, Terry., Jacqui, Taylor. (2003). The application of psycholinguistic principles to website design. doi: 10.1145/
2331829.2331838
[88] Lindsay, Woodbridge. (2024). Power of Language. doi: 10.33043/jsacp.15.2.36-49
[89] Senthil, Kumar, Muthusamy. (2019).Power of positive words: communication, cognition, and organizational
transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, doi: 10.1108/JOCM-05-2018-0140
[90] Anthony, M., Grant., Sean, O'Connor., Ingrid, Studholme. (2019). Towards a Positive Psychology of Buildings
and Workplace Community: the Positive Built Workplace Environment. doi: 10.1007/S41042-019-00019-2
[91] Devitt, E., & Kemkaran-Thompson, L. (2022). The power of language and influence. In British Small Animal
Veterinary Association eBooks. https://doi.org/10.22233/9781913859114.13.4
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981
19
