Content uploaded by Abdelkader Makhlouf
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Abdelkader Makhlouf on Dec 22, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Revue Algérienne Des Sciences Du Langage
Volume: 9 / N°: 2 (2024), pp 84 -96
84
Received 17-04-2024 Published: 22-12-2024
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language
Development: Insights, Challenges, and Interventions
Abdelkader Makhlouf1*
Nour Bachir University Center, Elbayadh, Algeria
Abstract
This study addresses the pervasive issue of socioeconomic disparities in children's language
development, drawing from a wide array of literature. The problem statement highlights the
consistent findings indicating a substantial lag in language skills among children from low
socioeconomic backgrounds compared to their affluent peers by age three. The main aim of
this research is to underscore the necessity of tailored interventions aimed at bridging this gap
and fostering language growth among economically disadvantaged children. The significance
of the study lies in its emphasis on the crucial role of early parent-child communication
quality, the impact of poverty on cognitive development and academic performance, the
influence of caregiver input quality, and the differences in access to educational resources
based on socioeconomic status. Methodologically, this research incorporates a comprehensive
review of relevant literature, synthesizing insights from various studies conducted by
researchers such as Hirsh-Pasek (2015), Miller (1995), Leroy (2017), Zimmerman (2017), and
Suskind (2015). Findings underscore the importance of parental involvement and targeted
interventions in improving language environments and outcomes for children from low
socioeconomic backgrounds. Implications of this research include the urgent need for policy
interventions and support systems aimed at addressing the enduring consequences of poverty
on children's learning and cognitive growth, as well as the promotion of equitable access to
educational resources and high-quality caregiver interactions.
Keywords: socioeconomic disparities, language development, tailored interventions, parent-
child communication, educational equity
Introduction
Children's language development is critical to their cognitive growth and academic
success. However, significant socio-economic disparities influence this trajectory, leading to
marked inequalities in language skills. Understanding and addressing these disparities is
crucial to improving children's educational outcomes.
This study examines socio-economic disparities in children's language development,
based on a literature review. It aims to identify the factors contributing to these inequalities
and to propose appropriate interventions to reduce this gap.
Research shows that children from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds lag
behind their more advantaged peers in language development as early as age three. Hirsh-
Pasek (2015) highlights the importance of the quality of early parent-child communication for
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
the development of language skills, especially in families with low resources. Raph (1965)
observes variations in language acquisition between children from disadvantaged
backgrounds and those from the middle class, highlighting the need for specific interventions.
Studies also show that poverty has long-term adverse effects on children's cognitive and
academic development (Miller, 1995). Barnett (1998) highlights the importance of pre-school
education in mitigating these effects. Morrissey (2018) indicates that neighbourhood poverty
intensifies these challenges. The quality of interactions with caregivers also plays a crucial
role (Leroy, 2017; Lestari, 2023).
Specific, parent-led interventions have proven effective in improving the language
environments of disadvantaged children (Suskind, 2015; Leffel, 2013). DiCataldo (2020) and
McIntosh (2007) have demonstrated the effectiveness of interventions based on storytelling
and phonological awareness.
Research Problem
This research focuses on the delays observed in the language skills of children from
disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds compared to their more affluent peers from the
age of three. This gap persists and widens over time, with significant academic and social
consequences.
Research Objectives
1. Identify factors contributing to socio-economic disparities in children's language
development.
2. Evaluate the effectiveness of existing interventions.
3. Propose recommendations for adapted interventions and support systems.
Research Questions
1. What are the main factors contributing to socio-economic disparities in children's
language development?
2. How effective are existing interventions in addressing these disparities?
3. What recommendations can be made for appropriate interventions?
Methodology
This research uses a literature review to synthesize the teachings of various studies. The
analysis focuses on recurring themes, models and gaps to inform proposed interventions.
Research Limitations
This study may be limited by the availability of relevant literature and the variability of
interventions across cultural and socio-economic contexts. These limitations underscore the
need for further research to address the complexities of this issue.
2. Review of Literature
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
2.1 Early Parent-Child Communication and Language Development Disparities
The quality of nonverbal and verbal interactions at 24 months was found to account for a
substantial portion, approximately 27%, of the variance in expressive language abilities one
year later (Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015). This finding underscores the significance of early
communication quality in predicting later language success, particularly among low-income
children. It suggests that fostering rich and interactive communication environments between
caregivers and children could significantly enhance language development outcomes.
In exploring the contribution of early communication quality to language success in low-
income children, Hirsh-Pasek and colleagues (2015) highlight the importance of interaction
quality over quantity. They argue that simply increasing the number of words spoken to
children or promoting sensitive parenting may not be sufficient to bridge the language gap
observed between low-income children and their more affluent peers. Instead, attention must
be paid to establishing a robust communication foundation within low-income families, which
can positively influence children's language abilities in the long term.
Raph (1965) discusses the challenges faced by socially disadvantaged children in language
development, emphasizing the limitations they encounter in benefiting from compensatory
opportunities, particularly those provided by schools. This highlights the need for
interventions and support systems that specifically target the unique linguistic and
communicative needs of children from low socioeconomic backgrounds.
Becker (2011) examines social disparities in children's vocabulary development and the
role of preschool education in mitigating these disparities. While preschool attendance
positively affects the vocabulary development of children from lower educated families, it
does not lead to a catching-up process. This suggests that additional interventions beyond
preschool education may be necessary to address the persistent gap in vocabulary between
children from higher and lower educated families.
Howard et al. (1970) found that children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds
demonstrated higher competence in certain oral communication skills compared to their lower
status counterparts. This highlights the influence of socioeconomic status on linguistic skill
measurement and underscores the importance of considering socioeconomic factors in
language development research and interventions.
Locke and Ginsborg (2003) emphasize the prevalence of language delays among
socioeconomically disadvantaged children and stress the importance of spoken language
exposure in their cognitive and linguistic development. They note that language delays in
these children are not solely attributable to poor cognitive abilities, suggesting that targeted
interventions focusing on language enrichment could be beneficial.
McNally et al. (2019) identify disparities in children's expressive language skills by
socioeconomic status as early as three years of age. Their findings underscore the urgent need
for interventions aimed at addressing disparities in maternal education, income, and
caregiving practices to improve children's language development outcomes.
2.2 The Impact of Poverty on Children's Cognitive Development and Academic
Achievement
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
The impact of poverty on children's cognitive development is profound and enduring, as
highlighted by Miller and Korenman (1995). Their research underscores the cumulative
nature of deficits associated with poverty across multiple age intervals. They emphasize that
the deficits linked with being impoverished in more than one age interval surpass the sum of
experiencing poverty in each of those intervals individually. This suggests that the effects of
poverty on cognitive development are not only persistent but also intensify over time,
amplifying the challenges faced by children growing up in impoverished environments.
Early childhood education emerges as a pivotal factor in mitigating the adverse effects of
poverty on children's cognitive development, as indicated by Barnett (1998). His findings
suggest that early childhood education programs produce persistent effects on achievement
and academic success, which can significantly benefit children living in poverty. While the
effects may not be uniformly observed on IQ, investment in programs such as Head Start and
public school preschool education holds promise in enhancing the long-term cognitive
development and academic outcomes of children from impoverished backgrounds.
The influence of neighborhood poverty on children's academic skills and behavior is a
critical area of investigation, as highlighted by Morrissey and Vinopal (2018). Their study
reveals that as tract-level poverty increases, children's academic achievement tends to worsen,
with particularly pronounced effects observed among children from poor households.
Furthermore, they emphasize that neighborhood disadvantage continues to impact academic
achievement well into second grade, underscoring the persistent nature of its effects on
children's educational outcomes.
2.3 The Impact of Quality Communication on Early Language Development
In early childhood education, interactions between teachers and children are crucial for
fostering language development. Leroy, Bergeron-Morin, Desmottes, and Maillart (2017)
underscore the protective role these interactions play, particularly for vulnerable children.
Quality teacher-child interactions not only enhance educational quality but also support
language and communication development. Similarly, Lestari and Handayani (2023) highlight
the significant role parents play in stimulating language development during early childhood.
They emphasize the correlation between parent-child interactions and language development
in adolescence, stressing the importance of parental involvement in language enrichment.
Research by Zauche et al. (2016) emphasizes the concept of "language nutrition" as crucial
for children's language and cognitive development. This involves language-rich interactions
with caregivers, which significantly impact developmental outcomes. Furthermore, Hansen
and Broekhuizen (2020) explore the quality of language-learning environments in toddler
childcare groups and its influence on vocabulary development. They find that responsive staff
and facilitating conversations positively affect vocabulary development from age 3 to age 5.
Parent-infant interaction is highlighted by Topping, Dekhinet, and Zeedyk (2013) as a
critical factor in children's language development. They stress the importance of parental
contingency and pre-literacy activities, which are vital for language acquisition. Fowler
(1995) discusses techniques for stimulating language development in at-risk children,
emphasizing the role of engaging children in language through play and daily routines.
Finally, Seitz and Marcus (1976) discuss the impact of mutual responsiveness in mother-child
interactions on language development, emphasizing its significance in enhancing
communication.
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
2.4 Socioeconomic Disparities in Educational Resources: Access and Inequality
Accessing academic resources in college is crucial for students' academic success. The
influence of socioeconomic status on this access has been a topic of interest in recent
research. Hanselman (2019) explored this topic and found that while basic hypothesis testing
didn't reveal significant differences in accessing academic resources between students of
different income levels, more advanced testing showed significant disparities for males and
undergraduate seniors from higher socioeconomic families. This suggests that students from
higher socioeconomic backgrounds may not perceive the need to access academic resources,
possibly due to a sense of entitlement or better preparation. This highlights the importance of
understanding how socioeconomic status impacts students' utilization of academic resources.
Disparities in access to effective teachers for poor and minority students have been a
concern in the educational system. Hanselman (2019) addressed this issue and found that the
observed achievement gaps for disadvantaged students were less than 2%. However, the
author emphasized the need for a comprehensive understanding to ensure equal opportunities
for all students. Additionally, Bischoff and Owens (2019) conducted a longitudinal analysis,
revealing growing social resource gaps exacerbated by income segregation. Despite some
effectiveness of school finance reforms in reducing funding inequities, persistent social
inequalities remain. This suggests a complex interplay between socioeconomic status, access
to resources, and educational outcomes.
Educational inequality persists due to socioeconomic factors, leading to disparities in
school resources and opportunities. Wong (1994) discussed how children from middle-class
families often attend schools with advanced curricula and stable tax bases, while
disadvantaged minority children face challenges accessing quality education. Policy
interventions aimed at improving school quality for disadvantaged students have the potential
to increase social mobility (Rouse & Barrow, 2006), highlighting the importance of
addressing socioeconomic disparities in education from an early age (Solano & Weyer, 2017).
Despite reform efforts, students from low-income families continue to face challenges such as
poor living conditions, limited access to technology, and inadequate nutrition (Benders,
2013).
2.5 The Impact of Input Quality on Children's Language Learning
2.5.1 Analyzing Input Quality along Three Dimensions: Interactive, Linguistic, and
Conceptual
In their seminal work, Rowe and Snow (2019) expound upon the dimensions of caregiver
input that are crucial for promoting language learning in early childhood. According to their
research, the most effective input is not only interactionally supportive but also linguistically
adapted and conceptually challenging, tailored to the child's age and level of language
proficiency. They underscore the significance of these dimensions, which vary based on
factors such as socioeconomic status, spoken language, and cultural background.
Drawing from the insights of Kersten (2021), the importance of L2 input and instructional
techniques in foreign language classrooms is highlighted. Kersten emphasizes the need for
instructional activities that provide comprehensibility and cognitive stimulation during the L2
acquisition process. Effective teaching practices, such as communicative activities and quality
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
interactions, are essential for enhancing comprehension and long-term retention in early
foreign language learners.
Macdonald's study (1991) delves into the relationship between input types and output
modification in English as a second language (ESL) learning contexts. Through an
exploration of various input types and conversational modifications, the study reveals the
significant impact of interactional features on language learning. Different types of input were
found to elicit varying degrees of output modification, indicating the importance of
immediate, delayed, residual, and restructured input for ESL learners' spoken performance.
Lev-Ari (2016) sheds light on the influence of individual differences in the social
environment on linguistic performance in adult native speakers. By examining factors such as
knowledge base, attentional patterns, and processing manner, Lev-Ari underscores the
importance of studying these differences to better understand language learning and
processing mechanisms. Understanding individual differences in input is crucial for
comprehending variations in linguistic performance across diverse populations.
Borovsky and Elman (2006) explore the impact of language input on semantic categories
and early word learning. Their computational simulations demonstrate how variations in early
language exposure affect subsequent word learning abilities, highlighting the relationship
between language input, category knowledge development, and lexical acquisition. The
findings underscore the critical role of early language input in predicting lexical proficiency
and semantic category development.
2.5.2 Input to Interaction to Instruction: Three Key Shifts in the History of Child
Language Research
Snow (2014) traces the historical shifts in child language research, emphasizing the
evolving understanding of language input, interaction, and instruction. The focus on language
input and adult-child interaction has gained particular relevance in education, especially
concerning access to academic language. The quantity and quality of language input
significantly impact children's language development, with explicit instruction in academic
language features proving essential for success in reading and writing.
Bórquez Morales and Hernández Alvarado (2021) delve into the intricate relationship
between input, output, and intake in second language learning. They emphasize the necessity
of converting received information into knowledge to produce language effectively. While
input plays a crucial role, output is deemed essential for activating knowledge and promoting
syntactic analysis in language learning. The authors advocate for a comprehensive
understanding of intake, wherein learners process input based on their cognitive apparatus and
prior knowledge, further facilitating language acquisition.
Huttenlocher (1998) explores the causal relationship between language input and language
growth in children. The study reveals that differences in language input within the normal
range significantly influence the development of children's vocabularies and syntactic skills.
Variations in language environments at home and school play a pivotal role in shaping
language skills at different developmental stages, underscoring the critical importance of early
language input for fostering linguistic proficiency.
2.6 Parent-Directed Interventions for Enhancing Language Development in Children
from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
In a pilot study by Suskind et al. (2015), a parent-directed home-visiting intervention
aimed at addressing socioeconomic disparities in children's language environments yielded
significant improvements in parent knowledge of language development. Results indicated a
notable increase in parent talk diversity and enhanced understanding of language
development, both one week and four months post-intervention. This study underscores the
potential of interventions targeting parental involvement in improving language outcomes
among low-SES children.
Parent-directed approaches have gained traction in enriching the early language
environments of children living in poverty (Leffel & Suskind, 2013). These interventions
emphasize the critical role of parental involvement in fostering language skills, particularly in
low socioeconomic contexts. Projects like the Thirty Million Words Project and Project
ASPIRE highlight the effectiveness of such interventions in narrowing the educational
achievement gap among low-SES populations.
Dicataldo, Florit, and Roch (2020) demonstrated the effectiveness of a narrative-based
intervention in enhancing oral language skills in preschoolers from low-SES backgrounds.
The intervention, although relatively brief, proved intensive and resulted in significant
improvements in broad oral language skills. Importantly, the study found that children's initial
vocabulary levels mediated their responsiveness to the intervention, suggesting tailored
approaches based on individual needs.
Mcintosh et al. (2007) investigated the efficacy of language and phonological awareness
intervention programs for socially disadvantaged preschoolers. The results showcased the
effectiveness of these programs, with post-intervention performance surpassing that of SES
controls and matching average SES controls. This highlights the potential of targeted
interventions in mitigating language disparities among disadvantaged populations.
Borisova et al. (2017) compared the impact of family-focused interventions to standard
pre-primary programs in Ethiopia, finding no significant differences in the gains made by
children. This suggests the potential scalability of family-based interventions in bolstering
early language and literacy skills in low-income countries.
Larson et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review of language-focused interventions for
culturally and linguistically diverse children, emphasizing the importance of culturally and
linguistically-responsive approaches. Positive effects were observed when interventions
addressed cultural and linguistic factors, underscoring the need for culturally-sensitive
interventions.
Miller et al. (2023) explored the mediating role of cognitively stimulating parent-child
interactions in enhancing early language and literacy skills in minority children with low
incomes. The study found significant indirect effects on language and literacy skills through
improvements in parental cognitive stimulation, highlighting the crucial role of parenting
interventions in children's school readiness.
Cohen-Mimran, Reznik-Nevet, and Korona-Gaon (2016) evaluated an activity-based
language intervention program for kindergarten children, reporting significant improvements
in language skills, particularly vocabulary. The study underscores the effectiveness of
interactive activities in promoting language development, benefiting children from various
socioeconomic backgrounds.
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
In conclusion, these studies collectively highlight the effectiveness of parent-directed
interventions, narrative-based approaches, and activity-based programs in enhancing language
outcomes for low-SES children. They underscore the importance of early interventions
tailored to individual needs and cultural contexts, emphasizing the pivotal role of parental
involvement in fostering language development.
3. Discussion
The comprehensive examination of the literature review on early parent-child
communication, the impact of poverty on cognitive development and academic achievement,
quality communication on early language development, socioeconomic disparities in
educational resources, and the impact of input quality on children's language learning presents
significant findings and insights that resonate with current research in the field. Discussing the
key findings yields the following points:
1-Early Parent-Child Communication and Language Development Disparities:
The study by Hirsh-Pasek et al. (2015) emphasizes the importance of early communication
quality in predicting later language success, especially among low-income children.
Contemporary research, such as that by McNally et al. (2019), also highlights the urgent
need for interventions targeting disparities in maternal education and income to improve
children's language development outcomes.
2-Impact of Poverty on Cognitive Development and Academic Achievement:
Miller and Korenman's (1995) research underscores the profound and enduring impact of
poverty on children's cognitive development, with effects intensifying over time.
Recent studies, like those by Morrissey and Vinopal (2018), continue to emphasize the
detrimental effects of neighborhood poverty on academic achievement, particularly among
children from poor households.
3-Impact of Quality Communication on Early Language Development:
Leroy et al. (2017) and Lestari and Handayani (2023) highlight the crucial role of teacher-
child interactions and parent-child interactions, respectively, in supporting language and
communication development.
Contemporary research by Hansen and Broekhuizen (2020) reinforces the significance of
language-rich environments and responsive interactions in toddler childcare groups for
vocabulary development.
4-Socioeconomic Disparities in Educational Resources: Access and Inequality:
Hanselman (2019) discusses disparities in accessing academic resources among students
from different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Recent studies, such as those by Bischoff and Owens (2019), continue to address persistent
social resource gaps exacerbated by income segregation, indicating ongoing challenges in
achieving educational equity.
5-Impact of Input Quality on Children's Language Learning:
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
Rowe and Snow (2019) emphasize the dimensions of caregiver input crucial for promoting
language learning in early childhood.
Current research, exemplified by Borovsky and Elman (2006), explores the impact of early
language input on subsequent word learning abilities, highlighting the critical role of input
quality in predicting lexical proficiency.
6-Parent-Directed Interventions for Enhancing Language Development in Children from Low
Socioeconomic Backgrounds:
Studies like those by Suskind et al. (2015) and Larson et al. (2020) demonstrate the
effectiveness of parent-directed interventions and culturally-sensitive approaches in
enhancing language outcomes for low-SES children.
Contemporary research, such as that by Miller et al. (2023) and Cohen-Mimran et al.
(2016), continues to explore the efficacy of various intervention programs in improving
language skills, particularly among minority children with low incomes.
To conclude, the findings from the analysis of the review of literature align with and
complement current research in highlighting the multifaceted impact of socioeconomic factors
on children's language development and academic achievement, as well as the effectiveness
of targeted interventions in mitigating disparities and fostering positive outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study set out to address the pressing issue of socioeconomic disparities
in children's language development, drawing upon a comprehensive review of literature
spanning several decades. The primary aim was to underscore the necessity of tailored
interventions aimed at bridging the gap in language skills among economically disadvantaged
children. Through a thorough examination of various studies, several key insights have
emerged.
Firstly, it's clear that the quality of early parent-child communication plays a pivotal role in
shaping later language development, particularly among low-income families. Additionally,
the impact of poverty on cognitive development and academic achievement cannot be
overstated, with deficits accumulating over time and intensified by neighborhood poverty.
Moreover, the quality of input children receive, whether from caregivers or educational
environments, significantly influences their language learning outcomes. Disparities in access
to educational resources further exacerbate these challenges, perpetuating inequalities in
academic achievement.
However, amidst these challenges lie opportunities for intervention. Parent-directed
interventions have shown promise in enhancing language outcomes for children from low
socioeconomic backgrounds, emphasizing the importance of parental involvement and
culturally-sensitive approaches.
Nevertheless, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of this research, including
potential constraints in the availability of relevant literature and the varying applicability of
proposed interventions across different cultural contexts.
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
Moving forward, there are some implications and recommendations for future research and
policy interventions. Policymakers and educators must prioritize initiatives aimed at
addressing the enduring consequences of poverty on children's learning and cognitive growth.
Additionally, further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of intervention programs
and to develop tailored approaches that account for the diverse needs of children from
different socioeconomic backgrounds.
In conclusion, by understanding the complex relationship between socioeconomic factors,
educational resources, and language development, we can work towards fostering more
equitable opportunities for all children, regardless of their economic circumstances.
References
BARNETT, W. Steven. « Long-term cognitive and academic effects of early childhood
education on children in poverty. » Preventive medicine 27 2 (1998): 204-7.
BENDERS, David S.. « Role of Socioeconomics in Education. » International Journal of
Social Work and Human Services Practice 1 (2013): 38-44.
BECKER, Birgit. « Social disparities in children's vocabulary in early childhood. Does pre-
school education help to close the gap? » The British journal of sociology 62 1 (2011): 69-88.
BISCHOFF, Kendra and Ann OWENS. « The Segregation of Opportunity: Social and
Financial Resources in the Educational Contexts of Lower- and Higher-Income Children,
1990–2014. » Demography 56 (2019): 1635 - 1664.
BOROVSKY, Arielle and Jeffrey L. ELMAN. « Language input and semantic categories: a
relation between cognition and early word learning. » Journal of Child Language 33 (2006):
759 - 790.
BÓRQUEZ MORALES, Lilia Sulema and Martha Guadalupe HERNÁNDEZ ALVARADO.
« Input, Output, and Intake. » Edähi Boletín Científico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
del ICSHu (2021): n. pag.
COHEN-MIMRAN, Ravit et al. « An Activity-Based Language Intervention Program for
Kindergarten Children: A Retrospective Evaluation. » Early Childhood Education Journal 44
(2016): 69-78.
DICATALDO, Raffaele et al. « Fostering Broad Oral Language Skills in Preschoolers from
Low SES Background. » International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17 (2020): n. pag.
FOX, Nathan A. et al. « Poverty reduction and the developing brain. » (2012).
FOWLER, William. « Language interaction techniques for stimulating the development of at
risk children in infant and preschool day care. » Early Child Development and Care 111
(1995): 35-48.
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
GAATONE, David. « Le prédicat : pour quoi faire ? » [en ligne], Lidil, n° 37, « Syntaxe et
sémantique des prédicats », p. 45-60. Available at http://lidil.revues.org/index2688.html
[consulted on: 07/09/2009].
HANSELMAN, Paul. « Access to Effective Teachers and Economic and Racial Disparities in
Opportunities to Learn. » The Sociological Quarterly 60 (2019): 498 - 534.
HANSELMAN, Paul. « Access to Effective Teachers and Economic and Racial Disparities in
Opportunities to Learn. » The Sociological Quarterly 60 (2019): 498 - 534.
HANSEN, Joakim E. and Martine L. BROEKHUIZEN. « Quality of the Language-Learning
Environment and Vocabulary Development in Early Childhood. » Scandinavian Journal of
Educational Research 65 (2020): 302 - 317.
HIRSH-PASEK, Kathy et al. « The Contribution of Early Communication Quality to Low-
Income Children’s Language Success. » Psychological Science 26 (2015): 1071 - 1083.
HOWARD, Marshall J. et al. « Language Abilities of Children with Differing Socioeconomic
Backgrounds. » Journal of Learning Disabilities 3 (1970): 328 - 335.
HUTTENLOCHER, Janellen. « Language input and language growth. » Preventive medicine
27 2 (1998): 195-9 .
KERSTEN, Kristin. « L2 input and characteristics of instructional techniques in early foreign
language classrooms – Underlying theory and pedagogical practice. » (2021).
LARSON, Anne L. et al. « A systematic review of language-focused interventions for young
children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. » Early Childhood Research
Quarterly 50 (2020): 157-178.
LERAY, Sandrine et al. « Les interactions enseignant/enfants comme soutien au
développement langagier des enfants en classe maternelle. » (2017).
LEFFEL, Kristin R. and Dana SUSKIND. « Parent-Directed Approaches to Enrich the Early
Language Environments of Children Living in Poverty. » Seminars in Speech and Language
34 (2013): 267 - 278.
LEV-ARI, Shiri. « Studying individual differences in the social environment to better
understand language learning and processing. » Linguistics Vanguard 2 (2016): n. pag.
LOCKE, Ann and Jane GINSBORG. « Spoken language in the early years: The cognitive and
linguistic development of three- to five-year-old children from socio-economically deprived
backgrounds. » Educational and Child Psychology (2003): n. pag.
MACDONALD, Doris. « An Investigation of the Relationship Between Input Type and
Output Modification in English as a Second Language. » (1991).
MAKHLOUF Abdelkader
95
MCINTOSH, Beth et al. « Enhancing the phonological awareness and language skills of
socially disadvantaged preschoolers: An interdisciplinary programme. » Child Language
Teaching and Therapy 23 (2007): 267 - 286.
MCLOYD, Vonnie. « Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. » The American
psychologist 53 2 (1998): 185-204 .
MCNALLY, Sinead et al. « Decomposing the social gradient in children's vocabulary skills at
3 years of age: A mediation analysis using data from a large representative cohort study. »
Infant behavior & development 57 (2019): 101326 .
MILLER, Elizabeth B et al. « Enhancing early language and literacy skills for racial/ethnic
minority children with low incomes through a randomized clinical trial: The mediating role of
cognitively stimulating parent-child interactions. » Child development (2023): n. pag.
MILLER, Jane E. and Sanders D. KORENMAN. « Poverty dynamics and cognitive
development among young children. » (1995).
MORRISSEY, Taryn W. and Katie VINOPAL. « Neighborhood Poverty and Children's
Academic Skills and Behavior in Early Elementary School. » Political Economy -
Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal (2018): n. pag.
RAPHA, Jane Beasley. « Language Development in Socially Disadvantaged Children. »
Review of Educational Research 35 (1965): 389.
ROUSE, Cecilia Elena and Lisa BARROW. « U.S. Elementary and Secondary Schools:
Equalizing Opportunity or Replicating the Status Quo? » The Future of Children 16 (2006):
123 - 99.
ROW, Meredith L. and Catherine E. SNOW. « Analyzing input quality along three
dimensions: interactive, linguistic, and conceptual. » Journal of Child Language 47 (2019): 5 -
21.
SEITZ, Sue and Spencer D. MARCUS. « Mother-Child Interactions: A Foundation for
Language Development. » Exceptional Children 42 (1976): 445 - 449.
SOLANO, Isaac S and Matt WEYER. « Closing the Opportunity Gap in Early Childhood
Education. » NCSL legisbrief 25 25 (2017): 1-2 .
SUSKIND, Dana et al. « A parent-directed language intervention for children of low
socioeconomic status: a randomized controlled pilot study*. » Journal of Child Language 43
(2015): 366 - 406.
TOPPING, Keith James et al. « Parent–infant interaction and children’s language
development. » Educational Psychology 33 (2013): 391 - 426.
VINOPAL, Katie and Taryn W. MORRISSEY. « Neighborhood disadvantage and children’s
cognitive skill trajectories. » Children and Youth Services Review 116 (2020): 105231 -
105231.
Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Language Development: Insights, Challenges, and
Interventions
96
WONG, Kenneth K. Y.. « Chapter 6: Governance Structure, Resource Allocation, and Equity
Policy. » Review of Research in Education 20 (1994): 257 - 289.
WONG, Kenneth K. Y.. « Governance Structure, Resource Allocation, and Equity Policy. »
Review of Research in Education 20 (1994): 257.
Zhang, Liwei and Wen-Jui HAN. « Uncovering Multidimensional Poverty Experiences in
Shaping Children's Socioemotional Trajectories during the First 6 Years of Schooling. »
Family process (2020): n. pag.
