ArticlePDF Available

Dr. Abed Chaudhury, Bangladeshi-Australian Gene Scientist: A Scientometric Portrait

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Dr. Abdul M (Abed) Chaudhury allies Abed Chaudhury is a scientist of international reputation. He is an Australia-Bangladesh based gene scientist with a sound knowledge in genetics, crop breeding, molecular biology, human nutrition and biotech. Recent past, he is the pioneer of ‘Panchabrihi, -yields five times, a new rice cultivation method, a revolutionary innovation to agricultural research. This study is based on his 68 publications brought out during 1984-2023, throughout 40 years of his research career. It shows various aspects of his career. It tries to draw a scientific portrait of the scientist analyzing several bibliometric indicators. From the collected data of his biography and bibliography of research publications, this study quantitatively assesses the contributions of the scientist highlighting year wise growth of research products, authorship patterns, author productivity, research spectrum and co-authors, leading collaborative authors, scattering of publications in various communication channels, his most preferred journals, and relationships with degree of collaboration. It counts Citation Growth Rate according to citation received, uncited indexes and Relative citation impact in different Abstracting and Indexing Journals. Annual Growth rate, Relative Growth rate, and doubling time are also enumerated in this study. It also examines whether the data set follows Lotka’s Law and Badford’s Law or not.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Data Sci. Info. Citation Studies., 2024; 3(3):317-336.
https://www.jcitation.org Research Article
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 317
DOI: 10.5530/jcitation.3.3.32
Copyright Information :
Copyright Author (s) 2024 Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
Publishing Partner : Manuscript Technomedia. [www.mstechnomedia.com]
Dr. Abed Chaudhury, Bangladeshi-Australian Gene
Scientist: A Scientometric Portrait
Susanta Koley
Central Library, Durgapur Institute of Advanced Technology & Management, G T Road, Rajbandh, Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman,
West Bengal, INDIA.
ABSTRACT
Dr. Abdul M (Abed) Chaudhury allies Abed Chaudhury is a scientist of international reputation.
He is an Australia-Bangladesh based gene scientist with a sound knowledge in genetics, crop
breeding, molecular biology, human nutrition and biotech. Recent past, he is the pioneer of
‘Panchabrihi, -yields ve times, a new rice cultivation method, a revolutionary innovation to
agricultural research. This study is based on his 68 publications brought out during 1984-2023,
throughout 40 years of his research career. It shows various aspects of his career. It tries to draw
a scientic portrait of the scientist analyzing several bibliometric indicators. From the collected
data of his biography and bibliography of research publications, this study quantitatively assesses
the contributions of the scientist highlighting year wise growth of research products, authorship
patterns, author productivity, research spectrum and co-authors, leading collaborative authors,
scattering of publications in various communication channels, his most preferred journals, and
relationships with degree of collaboration. It counts Citation Growth Rate according to citation
received, uncited indexes and Relative citation impact in dierent Abstracting and Indexing
Journals. Annual Growth rate, Relative Growth rate, and doubling time are also enumerated in
this study. It also examines whether the data set follows Lotka’s Law and Badford’s Law or not.
Keywords: Bibliometric study, Panchabrihi, Abed Chaudhury, Gene Science, Molecular
Biology, Agricultural research, Bangladesh, Australia, Paddy, Rice, Seed discovery, Fertilization
Independent Seed (FIS), Apomixes, Fractional seed without fertilization.
INTRODUCTION
Foods, health and education are the basic and necessary needs for
day to day life of people all over the world. If basic needs are not
sucient, the people of the country will be poor in all respects
and those countries also could not be developed. Agriculture
refers to crop and animal husbandry, aquaculture, sheries, and
forestry for food and non-food products. Agriculture was the
key development of the practice of living in one place for a long
time i.e., rises of human civilization. To make human civilization
better, some agricultural revolutions took place around the
world such as British Agricultural Revolution, Green Revolution,
Neolithic Revolution, etc. (Wikipedia, 2024). e development of
agriculture nearly 12,000 years ago which has changed the way
humans lived. Wildgrains were collected and eaten from at least
104,000 years ago. By around 9500 BC, the eight Neolithic founder
crops like wheat, barley, peas, lentils, bitter vetch, chickpeas,
and ax, etc. were cultivated in a large area in the Eastern
Mediterranean region of West Asia and core territory of Middle
East. Ricewas domesticated in China by 6200 BCwith earliest
known cultivation from 5700 BC. Rice was also domesticated
in West Africa and cultivated by 1000 BC (Wikipedia, 2024a).
Traditionally, Asian countries have the largest share in rice
production worldwide. Over 513 million metric tons of milled
ricewas produced in the last harvesting year globally. As per the
most recent ocial data, it is learnt that quantity of production
of rice was over 208 million metric tons in 2022, and China was
the world’s leading paddy rice producer, followed by India and
Bangladesh (FAO, 2022; Shahbandeh, 2024).
is scientometric study is based on biography and bibliography
of research publications of Dr. Chaudhury. ere are many
bibliometric analysis carried out by several library and
information scientist on eminent persons/ scientists either living
or death from dierent disciplines. Mostly have been highlighted
by the author in his dierent publications (Koley and Sen, 2016)
and by others (Rao, 2013; Dutta, 2019; Sidlingappa et al., 2023; Teli
and Maity, 2021). Notwithstanding, no such study on Chaudhury,
the Genetic scientist cum rich researcher has been done till now.
Hence this study and this is an original work.
Received: 05-11-2024;
Revised: 29-11-2024;
Accepted: 06-12-2024.
Correspondence:
Dr. Susanta Koley
Central Library, Durgapur Institute of
Advanced Technology & Management, G
T Road, Rajbandh, Durgapur -12, Paschim
Bardhaman, West Bengal, INDIA.
Email: shayanikoley.2013@gmail.com
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024318
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF DR. ABED CHAUDHURY
Early Life and Education
Chaudhury is an Australian-Bangladeshi renowned geneticist
as well as rice researcher. He is also looked at one of the most
distinguished leading international gures in modern biology. He
was born in a Bengali Muslim family, the Z amindars of Kanihati in
Hajipur Union, Kulaura, Moulvibazar District of Sylhet Division,
Bangladesh on 1 February 1956. His father was Abdul Mannan
(Ibrahim) Chaudhury and mother was Haza Khatun. He passed
Madhyamik from the Moulvibazar Government High School, and
higher secondary (HSC) from Notre Dame College, Dhaka. He
completed his B.Sc., Honours in Chemistry at the University of
Dhaka, Bangladesh in 1979, and his M. S. (Molecular Biology
and Chemistry) from University of Oregon, Eugene, USA in 1981.
Aer that, he received his PhD degree in Molecular Biology
from Organic State Institute of Molecular Biology, University of
Oregon, Eugene, USA in 1984. His thesis title is ‘Homologous
Recombination in Escherichia coli’ (Everybodywiki.com, 2023;
Bengal Byte, 2022; Kanihati.com, 2003; Knowledge Hub, 2020).
Chaudhury currently lives in Australia.
Professional Career
Chaudhury, the gene scientist started professional career as a
teacher and researcher at dierent institutions like National
Institute of Health (NIH),USA, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT), USA and while here, he conducted post
doctoral research in Food and Nutrition and Plant Biology. He
has devoted his professional knowledge in Rice Breeding and has
led research programmes in Australian Centre for International
Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and International Rice Research
Institute (IRRI). He was a visiting scientist at Ecole Normale
Supérieure of France (Bengal Byte, 2022; Knowledge Hub, 2020).
He led a team of scientists at Australian National Science Agency,
and under his supervision dierent research activities were done
there. Chaudhury also was associated with several institutions for
research works. Besides, he is a co-founder of Genofax, a global
biotechnology company which acts in developing AI technologies
for genomic medicine. Chaudhury tries to begin its big data
driven medication in Bangladesh (Dhaka Tribune, 2024;Tasnim,
2023). Before coming into contact with Genofax, Choudhury
has many outstanding research works in crop breeding, climate
mitigation, and genetics globally, including notable contributions
to the agricultural sector of Bangladesh (Tasnim, 2023).
He has memberships of dierent professional societies namely
Genetics Society of America, Inter society of Plant Molecular
Biology, American Association of Advancement of Science,
New York Academy of Science, etc. Chaudhury was committee
members of several organizations such as CSIRO Forum
committee (1995-2000); Plant Industry Panel (1992-1994);
Sexual Plant reproduction association as Australia Representative
(2000-2001); the International Plant Genetic Resource Institute,
Rome, Italy. He also worked as a grant-reviewer such as regular
reviewers of grants of NSF, USDA, US small business grants,
NIH, USA and ARC of Australia; ad-hoc adviser to the Austrian
Government in summer, 2000; and reviewers of all major
international journals specializing in Plant Science (Kanihati.
com, 2003).
Research Contributions
Aer completing his PhD in 1984, he joined as Head of Scientic
Innovation at Loam Bio, Australia; Chief Scientist and Director
at Vita Grain Pte. Ltd., and Vita Rice; Principal Scientist at
Syngenta Australia and New Zealand. Before that, he worked
as Senior Principal Research Scientist (Plant Biology) at the
Commonwealth Scientic and Industrial Research Organization
(CSIRO) in Australia for 19 years where he pioneered the work
on Fertilization Independent Seed (FIS) (Knowledge Hub, 2020).
He established the foundation of work on polycomb group genes
in seed development. He has also contributed to the development
of many varieties of crops that are important for human nutrition
such as black rice, black tomato and others glucose reducing
rice. He also worked at Soil Company (Bengal Byte, 2022; ATSE,
2022). When he led as a postdoctoral scientist at HHI and MIT,
USA, he discovered a new gene namely ‘Rekdi’ through genetic
recombination which drew an immense attention and interest
in research and practices in the USA and Europe in 1980s. Aer
that he created three Fertilization Independent Seed (FIS). His
FIS formula commenced an ‘era of apomixes’. e mutants can
produce fractional seed without fertilization. ere are rst
characterized genes involved in apomixes, a method of making
seed without the father (Knowledge Hub, 2020; Bengal Byte,
2022). is was his one of the revolutionary innovations. Out of
many innovations, ‘red-maize’ was one of the most prominent
innovations. It is a drought-tolerant with more nutritious than
rice; and resistant to cancer diseases. He also invented dierent
types of new rice like Haza-1, Jalalia, Tanha and Doon. Recently,
in 2023, he has developed ‘Panchabrihi’- uncommon paddy seed
yields ve times throughout the year, and ‘Kanihati 1 to 16’, a new
variety of rice that is cultivated in Amon season. It has named
aer his homeland. is newly discovered rice can be cultivated
during short time and is produced huge in quantity (Alam, 2023).
Dr. Chaudhury is a researcher on heredity. He also invented red
rice and colored corn. Colored corn, which is anti-diabetic and
anti-cancer, is discussed worldwide. He is currently studying
on high yielding rice production and future food security in
Australia (Gfmdhaka.com, 2022). Chaudhury’s research activity
has spanned more than 40 years in the eld of molecular biology
and allied. Many students have been awarded PhD degree under
his guidance including Julie Glover (ANU), Amy Chin Atkins
(ANU), omas Choi (Melbourne University), and Ming Luo
(ANU) (Kanihati.com, 2003).
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 319
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Panchabrihi: a New Discovery of Rice Production
Method
Aer 20 years working as a leading rice researcher at Australian
National Research Organization, he discovered nearly 300 paddy
seeds. He went Australia and stayed there for working purpose,
yet he has been at the agriculture farm in his birth place ‘Kanihati’
for testing and cultivating paddy seeds that he discovered. us,
it is going on. en, Chaudhury started to think why once
harvested rice plant could not produce many times like as mango
or jackfruit. From this thought, he began new research journey for
today’s Panchabrihi. At the beginning, he continued to separate
those rice seeds from which again new sheaf of paddy were grown
aer cutting and harvesting once ripping paddy. In this way, 12
types of paddy seeds were found by him. He started cultivation
with the 12 types of seeds and observed that these gave regular
yielding second time. en, again, he tried to get yielding third
time and he also succeeded in that. But except four types of seeds
(out of 12) the rest were ruined aer giving four time yielding.
He went on study on the four types of seed for ten years using
two methods. One is hybridization between local seed and high
yielding seeds. Second one is hybridization between local seed
and local hybrid seeds. us, aer long eorts with the farmers of
Kanihati, Chaudhury discovered ‘Panchabrihi’ that gave yielding
during three seasons Boro, Aus and Amon or throughout the year
(Bengal Byte, 2022). ‘Panchabrihi’ is a newly invented uncommon
paddy. It is a historic discovery of agricultural research that is very
much needed mainly in the rice eating countries for meeting food
shortage. Especially that’s how natural calamities like ood and
drought are took place in Bangladesh and India every year; it will
relieve the food crisis of the growing population of the countries.
ough, it can be cultivated worldwide. So, ‘Panchabrihi’, a new
type of rice production method that is considered to be a landmark
discovery of 21st century in a genetic research. e ‘Panchabrihi’
was named by Dr. Chaudhury, is combination of two terms-
‘Pancha’ meaning ‘ve, and ‘brihi’ that means ‘paddy’. Reasons for
this type of naming are that if this paddy seed is once planted in
the eld, it will yield ve times throughout the year and during
three seasons. It is worth noting that 'Panchabrihi' cultivation
allows for the production of one variety of Boro, two of Aman,
and two of Aush from one rice tree. In Indian states like Assam,
West Bengal, Odisha, and Bangladesh, rice is usually sown thrice
in a year such as Aus, Amon, and Boro. Aus is sown in summer
along with pre-monsoonal rains and harvested in autumn. Aman
is sown in the rainy season (July-August) and harvested in winter.
Boro is sown in winter and harvested in summer.
Research Implications
is variety of rice will yield ve times a year from one plant.
Aer rst time, its production will be reduced in the second
time; the third time this yield is much higher than previous
productions. According to the explanation of Chaudhury with
an example, if the rst time 40g of rice is produced per unit of a
plant, it will be 20g in the second time, followed by 50 to 60g in
the third time, 20g in the fourth and 15g in the h time. is rice
seed yields three-time higher production than regular separate
cultivation of Boro, Aus and Amon (Billah, 2023). It needs not
to completely remove the rice plant aer the rst harvesting. As
per the description of the scientist, methods of cultivation has
described below (Gfmdhaka.com, 2022). He engaged farmers
in his birthplace Kanihati in Sylhet, Bangladesh to build a rural
innovation hub i.e., farmer-led innovation platform for increasing
biodiversity and generation of climate-compliant crop, which
recently led to the innovation of 'Panchabrihi', a new type of rice
cultivation method (Tasnim, 2023). For many years he has been
working enthusiastically to reform his home-place Kanihati into a
rural hub of intellectual activity especial attention to educational
improvement. To give a shape his ideas, he initiated a project
namely “Kanihati Experiment,” for demonstration of social,
intellectual, agricultural and environmental transformation
(Bengal Institute, 2024; Rice News Today, 2024). For this purpose,
he has built an agriculture farm in his native place ‘Kanihati.
Procedures of cultivation of ‘Panchabrihi’ are given below as
described by the scientist.
Seasons or Throughout the Year
‘Panchabrihi’ paddy is harvested for three seasons- Bora, Aus and
Aman or the whole year.
Materials and Methods
e scientist described the procedure for the cultivation of the
rice. First time for boro season, it is sown in January (winter).
Aer 110 days, during rst week of May, it is harvested rst time.
en aer 45 days, in July, it is started second time production.
Next, aer every one and half months, third, fourth- and h-time
production will be began respectively. It must be noted that with
proper irrigation and care, use of urea fertilizer in right ratio, the
crop grows to a height of 85 cm to one meter in 110 days. Every
time aer production, the paddy is to be cut at a height of 35 cm
from the ground.
Production
For the rst time, the production of harvested paddy may be four
tons per hectare. Since then, the yielding per hectare is two-three
tons. All varieties can be yielded about 16 tons per hectare.
Easily Seed Preservation
Farmers themselves can collect seeds from the harvested paddy
and easily preserve them for future cultivation.
Research Limitations
e ‘Panchabrihi’ yields ve times a year. It cannot have impressed
local scientists of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) or
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI). e scientist
wants to cultivate this paddy seed in Bangladesh and minimize
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024320
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
the crisis of food of the growing population of the country. Few
experts raise questions about his discovery not yet peer-reviewed
or no publication of the ndings of this discovery in any journal
(Billah, 2023; Rice News Today, 2024). e description of his
innovation, he demonstrated in presence of several journalists
at a seminar organized by the London-Bangla Press Club on
October, 2023 (Alam, 2023). However, some body takes it positive
and it is in discussion and criticism in Bangladesh. It is just ying
on dierent social Medias. Hope that its true facts will come in
front of all and start its cultivation in Bangladesh and other rice
producing countries.
Future Research
Chaudhury is cultivating ‘Panchabrihi’ in homeland in
Bangladesh for bringing interest of such paddy seed. He also
tries to introduce it among the farmers outside the Bangladesh.
As it is produced more than one time, it may solve the shortage
of foods especially in the rice-eating countries. Not only is that
it also environment friendly. Bangladesh as well as West Bengal,
Assam is aected by ood, drought many years and the paddy
cultivation using this method may supply of rice in the period of
crises at any time.
Chaudhury’s Talents beyond Scientic Research
Works
Dr. Abed is a multitalented gure. Beyond his talent in scientic
research, he is a powerful thinker, science writer, activist, and a
man of literature. He has written so many non-ction books and
several books of poetry in both Bangla and English. His rst book
Shoibal O Ontorikko (Bengali): an anthology of poems published
by Dibya Prokash in 1999. His books include the Blueprint of
Experience; Human Genome: Man of Genes, Dream, Existence,
River, and other Poems, etc. in Bengali, and Paradigm Shi, the
Gene revolution, the Future of Food in English. In addition, his
other books are namely Nirbachito Kobita, Anguished Rivers and
Other Designs, Shopno Sotta Nodi and Onnanno Kobita. Besides,
he also has written columns such as Durba Sisir O Porbotmala,
and Priyo Australia online news portal (Everybodywiki.com,
2023; Knowledge Hub, 2020). For his varieties of talent, some are
said that he is “A Man of Sheer of Brilliance” (Knowledge Hub,
2020).
Honors and Achievements
Out of the scientists of National Research Council of Australia
whose names have been recommended for nomination for Nobel
Prize, Chaudhury is one of them (Bengal Byte, 2022). He received
several honour and achievements (Kanihati.com, 2003; Alam,
2023):
1987-1989: Homan La Roche Fellow of the Life Science Research
Foundation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
1984-1986: Visiting Fellowship, National Institute of Health,
USA.
1979-1984: Post-graduate Research Fellowship, University of
Oregon, Eugene, USA.
Honorary posts, he held
1989 (March & onwards): Research Scientist, Senior Research
Scientist, and Principal Research Scientist at CSIRO Division of
Plant Industry, Canberra, Australia.
1992 (& on onwards): Subprogram Leader at CSIRO Plant
In dustry.
1987 (January) – 1989 (February): LSRF Postdoctoral Fellow at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
1984 (December) – 1986 (December): Visiting Fellow of the
National Institute of Health, USA.
Research Grants he received
1992: Grant from Rockefeller Foundation on Apomixis.
1997: ACIAR Grant on Apomixis.
2000: Bayer Crop Science Grant on Apomixis.
Honours he received as an invited speaker, invited plenary
speaker, chairman speaker, co-organizer, and teacher.
1990: 4th International Conference on Arabidopsis research,
Vienna.
1992: International Congress on Flowering, Amsterdam,
Netherlands.
1993: Workshop on Apomixis, International Rice Research
Institute, Philippines.
1993: 5th International Conference on Arabidopsis, Columbus,
Ohio, USA.
1994: “Plants for the Future” – A meeting of a joint US-Australia
bilateral exchange, Cairns, Australia.
1994: Chairman Lecture, International Congress on Plant
Reproduction, Vienna, Austria (did not attend).
1995: 6th International Arabidopsis Congress, Madison, USA.
1996: (i) International Congress of sexual Plant reproduction,
Lorne, Victoria, Australia; (ii) Banbury Conference on Plant
reproduction, Cold Spring Harbour, USA;(iii) Plenary Speaker,
Asia-Pacic Congress on Agricultural Biotechnology, Hua-Hin
ailand; (iv) Institute of Molecular Agrobiology, Singapore.
1997: (i) 50th Golden Jubilee Lecture, Delhi University; (ii) ISPMB
Conference Singapore.
1998: (i) Bellagio Conference on Apomixis; (ii) Asia-Pacic
Agricultural Biotechnology Conference.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 321
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
2000: (i) International Conference of Sexual Plant reproduction
Research, Ban, Canada, April; (ii) European Apomixis
Workshop, Bath, UK, May; (iii) International Society of Plant
Molecular Biology, Quebec City, Canada; June; (iv) PGS/Aventis
Laboratories, Ghent, May; (v) Biology Department University
of Milan, Italy, May; (vi), INRA, Versailles, France May; (vii)
Invited speaker CNRS laboratories, Gi Sur Yvette, France June;
(viii) Invited Speaker, Ecole Normale Superieure, Lyon, France,
April; (ix) Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle,
Washington, April; (x) Genoscope, Evry, France, June; (xi)
Apomixis session at International Conference on Sexual Plant
reproduction, Ban, Canada; (xii) International Society of Plant
Molecular Biology, Quebec city, Canada.
2001: (i) International Apomixis Conference in Como, Italy in
April; (ii) An International conference organized by NIAS, Japan
in Tsukuba in November; (iii) A Course organized on Molecular
Plant Breeding organized by International Center of Genetic
Engineering and Biotechnology held in Dhaka University,
Bangladesh in November; (iv) International Arabidopsis
Conference held in Seville, Spain in July.
2003: Lorne Genome Conference, Australia.
Other awards
2015: Abdul Mannan Chaudhury Memorial Award.
2022: Activate and ATSE Awards.
OBJECTIVES
e main objectives of the study are:
To identify the year- and age wise distribution of authorship
pattern of Chaudhury;
To obser ve the status of the scientist as main author and co-author;
To measure the degree of collaboration (collaboration coecient);
To calculate author productivity;
To identify the research spectrum with co-authors;
To nd out peak period of productivity;
To identify channel wise papers published;
To count citation received and Citation Growth Rate;
To determine Relative Un-cited Index; and Relative Citation
Impact;
To examine the validity of Lotka’s Law for Co-authors;
To test Bradford’s law for publication channels.
SCOPE & METHODOLOGY
rough searching the name “Dr. Abed Chaudhury” using
Google Scholar (GS), Research Gate (RG) and PubMed (PM)
databases, and ltering the publications with his variant names
such as Abed Chaudhury, A M Chaudhury, A Chaudhury, a list
of his 68 scientic research publications during 1984-2023 has
been prepared for this scientometric analysis. In addition, some
publications and other data have been accumulated from his CV
and dierent oine and online resources. e collected data were
transferred into MS-excel and Words. Data are tabulated using
various tables as required in this study. is study investigates
authorship pattern, main authors and co-authors, author
productivity and research team from 68 papers. Various others
facts such as collaboration coecient, age wise publication
pattern, peak period of productivity, publication channel wise
scattering of publications, Citation Growth Rate count, Relative
uncited index and Relative Citation Impact, Annual Growth
rate, Relative Growth rate and Doubling time, etc. are generated.
Finally, it has also been examined validity of data set for Lotka’s
Law and Bradfords law.
DATA ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION
Year-and-Age wise Authorship Patterns
Table 1 shows year and Chaudhury’s age wise papers during
1984-2023. His rst collaborative paper appeared in 1984 when
he was 29 years old and his productive life spanned 40 years.
Out of 68, there are four single authored papers 1 in 1993 (age
38), 2 in 2001 (age 46), and 1 in 2005 (age 50), and remaining
64 are multi-authored papers. Out of them, he has produced 19
papers as rst author, 10 as second-author, 8 as third author, 6
as fourth author, and 10 as h author and so on. He has two
papers, one in 2023 (age 68) and year not found for other under
mega-authorship. He led the team as rst author in as many as
19 papers. In all he has published 45 papers as co-authors. In
his 40 years of productive life, he has no publication in 1987-88,
1990, 2003-04, 2006, 2011-12, 2104, 2016, and 2018-22. From
the table, it is also observed that the scientist has published 54
(79.41%) papers, more than 50% when he was 50 years of his age.
When he completed 60 years, more than 90% papers have been
published by him. He produced 3 papers in his retried period.
Year of publication has not identied (YNF) for one paper. Over
all 290 co-authors were involved in research work along with the
scientist. His productivity peaked at the age of 46 in the year 2001.
It is observed that Chaudhury has contributed a maximum
number i.e., 8 of outstanding contributions at the age of 46, i.e.,
in the year 2001, followed by 7 at the age 44 in the year 1999, 5
papers each in the years 1998 and 2000 at the age of 43 and 45.
He has published 4 papers each in the years 1994 (age 39), 1996
(age 41) and 2002 (age 47). ree papers have been contributed
by him in 2005 at the age of 50 and so on.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024322
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Degree of Collaboration
It is observed that during 40 years of his productive period, the DC
has its maximum value 1 only in 23 years i.e., no single-authored
paper has been published in 23 years (Table 1). ere is DC value
equal to 0.5 for one year i.e., 1993; the same greater than 0.5 for
two years, 2001 (DC 0.75) and 2005 (DC 0.67). In all, DC Value
is 0.94.
Annual Growth Rate (AGR) of Research Articles
Table 2 shows annual growth rate and cumulative annual growth
rate of publications. To measure the AGR, the following formula
can be used, that is AGR= (End value – First value) x 100/ First
value (Jain & Meera, 2022). For example, here rst one has been
worked out for hints, for the years 1984 to 1985. So, here, End
value corresponding the year 1985 =2, First value corresponding
the year 1984= 2. erefore, AGR = (2-2) x 100/2= 0 and so on.
In case of annual growth, in 1997 and 1998, there is an increase of
400% from 1 to 5 papers. In 1993-94 and 1995-96, a 100% growth
from the previous year. Aer 1998, it has gradually declined to
28.57% in the year 2000; again, it has increased. In cumulative
annual growth (CAG), it was seen that during the starting years,
the increase was 20 to 100% till in 2001. Aer that CAG varies
from 1 to 6%. It can be mentioned that inference in number of
publications exists between 1 to 8.
Year
TAP
CAP
AA
PPA
SAP
MAP
Authorship Position (P)
CoA
DC
=MAP/TAP
P1P2P3P4P5P6P7P8P9P10.
1984 2 2 29 1 2 1 1 8 1.00
1985 2 4 30 2 2 2 2 1.00
1986 2 6 31 3 2 1 1 5 1.00
1989 2 8 34 6 2 2 2 1.00
1991 1 9 36 8 1 1 7 1.00
1992 1 10 37 9 1 1 4 1.00
1993 2 12 38 10 1 1 1 3 0.50
1994 4 16 39 11 4 3 1 11 1.00
1995 2 18 40 12 2 1 1 6 1.00
1996 4 22 41 13 4 1 2 1 20 1.00
1997 1 23 42 14 1 1 5 1.00
1998 5 28 43 15 5 1 1 2 1 22 1.00
1999 7 35 44 16 7 3 1 1 1 1 47 1.00
2000 5 40 45 17 5 1 4 18 1.00
2001 8 47 46 18 2 6 3 1 1 1 22 0.75
2002 4 51 47 19 4 3 1 6 1.00
2005 3 54 50 22 1 2 1 1 5 0.67
2007 2 56 52 24 2 1 1 15 1.00
2008 2 58 53 25 2 1 1 10 1.00
2009 2 60 54 26 2 1 1 5 1.00
2010 2 62 55 27 2 1 1 15 1.00
2013 1 63 58 30 1 1 2 1.00
2015 1 64 60 32 1 1 9 1.00
2017 1 65 62 34 1 1 9 1.00
2023 1 66 68 40 1 1 15 1.00
YNF 1 68 ** 1 1 17 1.00
Tota l 68 4 64 19 10 8 6 10 4 1 3 1 2 290 0.94
Abbreviations: TAP= Annual Publication, CAP= Cumulative Annual Publication, AA= Author’s Age, PPA= Publication Productive Age, SAP = Single Authored
Publications, MAP= Multiple Authored Publications P1 = author in 1st position; P2 = author in 2nd position & so on; CoA = No. of Co-authors, DC= Degree of
Collaboration = MAP/TAP; YNF= Year of publication not found.
Table 1: Year-and- age wise paper production of Chaudhury.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 323
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Year Research Articles Cumulative Total AGR = (End value – First value) x 100/First value
Results
AGR (%) Cumulative-AGR (%)
1984 2 2 -- --
1985 2 4 0 100.00
1986 2 6 0 50.00
1987 0 6 -100 0
1988 0 6 0 0
1989 2 8 0 33.33
1990 0 8 -100 0
1991 1 9 0 12.50
1992 1 10 0 11.11
1993 2 12 100.00 20.00
1994 4 16 100.00 33.33
1995 2 18 100.00 12.50
1996 4 22 100.00 22.22
1997 1 23 75.00 4.54
1998 5 28 400.00 21.73
1999 7 35 40.00 25.00
2000 5 40 28.57 14.28
2001 8 48 60.00 20.00
2002 4 52 -50.00 6.25
2003 0 52 -100.00 0
2004 0 52 0 0
2005 3 55 0 5.76
2006 0 55 0 0
2007 2 57 0 3.63
2008 2 59 0 3.51
2009 2 61 0 3.38
2010 2 63 0 3.27
2011 0 63 -100.00 0
2012 0 63 0 0
2013 1 64 0 1.58
2014 0 64 100.00 0
2015 1 65 0 1.56
2016 0 65 100.00 0
2017 1 66 0 1.53
2018 0 66 100.00 0
2019 0 66 0 0
2020 0 66 0 0
2021 0 66 0 0
2022 0 66 0 0
2023 1 67 0 1.51
YNF 1 68 0 1.49
Table 2: Annual Growth Rate of research publications and Cumulative Annual Growth.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024324
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Doubling Time (DT)
RGR and DT are two important indicators in bibliometric study.
RGR is the increment in the number of research article per unit of
time. Table 3 counts RCR and DT from 1984-2023. RGR and DT
have been measured from 1984 to 2023. RGR is calculated year
wise. e following formula has used for nding the value of RGR
(Mondal and Raychoudhury, 2017; Jain and Meera, 2022; Sawale
and Mete, 2021; Mondal, 2021):
RGR = W2 – W1 / T 2 – T1
Where,
W1 = Natural log of initial number of research articles;
W2 = Natural log of nal number of research articles;
T1 – T2 = Unit dierence between the initial year (time) and nal
year (time).
Here, time dierence is one year. So, formula shortly is:
RGR = W2 – W1
e corresponding DT can be measured as DT = 0.693/ RGR,
one by one (Mondal and Raychoudhury, 2017; Jain and Meera,
2022) and enumerated values for DGR and DT have been shown
in Table 4. e DGR has been decreased from 0.693 in 1985 to
0.015 in 2023 during the time span of 38 years. During the years,
the DT has been increased from 1985 (1.000) to 2023(46.200). All
over its curve has been up and down in the time span of 38 years
(Figure 1).
Non-Collaborative Papers
Table 4 shows non-collaborative publication pattern and time
span for publication. Chaudhury produced a largest number of
non-collaborative papers i.e., 68 throughout his life. Five-author
collaboration has created in the largest number of papers, i. e.,
16 with the time span of 18 years. Two-author papers totaling 13
was published in a time span of 26 years. Four-author papers i.e.,
9 have seen the light of day in a time span of 23 years. Besides,
eight-author 6 papers took 27 year of time spans. ere are 5
three-author papers which have produced in a time span of 28
years. Year of publication for one paper could not be ascertained.
Year Research
Articles
Cumulative Total W1W2RGR
= (W2 minus W1) / 1
DT = 0.693/ RGR
1984 2 2 -- 0.6931 0 0
1985 2 4 0.6931 1.3862 0.693 1.000
1986 2 6 1.3862 1.7917 0.406 1.706
1987 0 6 1.7917 1.7917 0 0
1988 0 6 1.7917 1.7917 0 0
1989 2 8 1.7917 2.0794 0.287 2.415
1990 0 8 2.0794 2.0794 0 0
1991 1 9 2.0794 2.1972 0.118 5.872
1992 1 10 2.1972 2.3025 0.105 6.600
1993 2 12 2.3025 2.4849 0.182 3.807
1994 4 16 2.4849 2.7725 0.288 2.406
1995 2 18 2.7725 2.8903 0.118 5.872
1996 4 22 2.8903 3.0910 0.201 3.447
1997 1 23 3.0910 3.1354 0.044 15.750
1998 5 28 3.1354 3.3322 0.241 2.875
1999 7 35 3.3322 3.5553 0.223 3.107
2000 5 40 3.5553 3.6888 0.136 5.095
2001 8 48 3.6888 3.8712 0.182 3.807
2002 4 52 3.8712 3.9512 0.080 8.662
2003 0 52 3.9512 3.9512 0 0
2004 0 52 3.9512 3.9512 0 0
2005 3 55 3.9512 4.0073 0.056 12.375
Table 3: Relative Growth Rate and Doubling time of publication of research articles.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 325
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Status in Byline of Authors
Table 5 depicts the status of Chaudhury in the byline of authors in
his 68 collaborative papers. He appears as the rst author as many
as 19 cases. He occupies the second and h place in 10 cases
each, third place in 8 papers, forth position in 6 papers, and so on.
He has placed 9th, 13th and 14th position in 1 case each.
Publications by Quinquennium
e quinquennium publication data of Chaudhury has been
counted in the Table 1 and graphical representation has been
shown in Figure 2. e highest publications has gured 24 during
1999-2003, at the age range of 44 to 48 followed by 16 papers
during 1994 to 1998 (age range 39 to 43; 7 contributions during
2004 to 2008 (age range 49-53); 6 papers each during 1984 to
1998 (age range 29 to 33) and 1989 to 1993 (age range 34 to 38)
respectively. More than 76% papers have been contributed by
the scientist during the rst four quinquenniums (age range 29
to 48). It is observed that the author’s productivity has increased
with the time span of 20 years of his active productive age and
then declines with age. His productivity peaked during the fourth
quinquennium (Figure 2) when he has published 24 papers
during age range 44 to 48.
Prolic Collaborators
Table 6 enlists name wise prominent co-authors’ publications
and aliations. Research team of Chaudhury consists of 149
individual co-authors in his productive career and produced as
many as 32 papers in collaboration with Elizabeth Dennis who
Year Research
Articles
Cumulative Total W1W2RGR
= (W2 minus W1) / 1
DT = 0.693/ RGR
2006 0 55 4.0073 4.0073 0 0
2007 2 57 4.0073 4.0430 0 0
2008 2 59 4.0430 4.0775 0.035 19.800
2009 2 61 4.0775 4.1108 0.033 21.000
2010 2 63 4.1108 4.1431 0 0
2011 0 63 4.1431 4.1431 0 0
2012 0 63 4.1431 4.1431 0 0
2013 1 64 4.1431 4.1588 0.016 43.312
2014 0 64 4.1588 4.1588 0 0
2015 1 65 4.1588 4.1743 0.015 46.200
2016 0 65 4.1743 4.1743 0 0
2017 1 66 4.1743 4.1896 0.015 46.200
2018 0 66 4.1896 4.1896 0 0
2019 0 66 4.1896 4.1896 0 0
2020 0 66 4.1896 4.1896 0 0
2021 0 66 4.1896 4.1896 0 0
2022 0 66 4.1896 4.1896 0 0
2023 1 67 4.1896 4.2046 0.015 46.200
YNF 1 68 4.2046 4.2195 0.014 49.500
No. of authors 1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 8A 9A 10A 11A 16A 18A TP
No. of non-collaborative 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4
No. of collaborative papers - 13 5 9 16 5 1 6 2 2 2 1 2 64
Time Span 13 26 28 23 18 11 1 27 15 3 9 1 1**
Duration
1993-2005
1984-2009
1986-2013
1986-2008
1992-2009
1997-2007
2001-2001
1984-2010
1996-2010
2015-2017
1999-2007
2023-2023
1999-1999
Abbreviations: 1A= one authored paper, 2A= two authored papers & so on. TP= Total Paper. ** Year of publication not identied for one eighteen-authored paper
Table 4: Non-collaborative publication and time span.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024326
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
is found to be the most productive collaborative of the scientist.
ere are eight collaborators with whom he has published ve
and more than ve papers. Apart from Elizabeth Dennis, other
signicant collaborators are J. Peacock (N22), M. Luo (N15), S.
Craig (12), Frederic Berger (N8), Anna M Koltunow (N8), P.
Bilodeau (N6), etc. Apart, a group of two co-authors has published
5 papers each; a class of two authors 4 papers each; a batch of ve
co-authors 3 papers each; another a category of 21 authors has
published 2 papers each along with the scientist. ere are 112
authors published 1 paper each.
Lotka’s Law Testing
As Lotkas Law, 60% of total author should have 1 paper each, 15%
will have 2 papers each, 7% should have 3 papers each and so on.
For the data set from this study, here 75.17% have 1 paper each
that is ≥60%; and 14.05% have 2 papers each, not equal to 15%;
3.36% have 3 papers each that could not reach to 7%, the standard
percentage as per law, and so on. erefore, the data set does not
validate the Lotkas law.
Publication Channels
Table 7 shows the rank list of four types of publication channels.
His most publications are Journal Articles (JA) (77.95%), followed
Publications Status or position in the byline
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 13th 14th Total
Two-authored 7 6 13
ree-authored 1 2 2 5
Four-authored 5 4 9
Five-authored 3 2 1 2 8 16
Six-authored 1 1 3 5
Seven-authored 1 1
Eight-authored 1 1 1 1 2 6
Nine-authored 1 1 2
Tenth-authored 1 1 2
Eleven-authored 1 1 2
Sixteen- authored 1 1
Eighteen-authored 1 1 2
Tota l 19 10 8 6 10 4 1 3 1 1 1 64
Table 5: Position in the byline in collaborative papers.
Figure 1: Graphical representation of RGR & DT, 1984-2023.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 327
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
PWA Co-author's Names FYP LYP Time Span
(Years)
P/Y
32 Dennis, Elizabeth 1991 2010 20 1.60
22 Peacock, J. 1991 2010 20 1.10
15 Luo, M. 1998 2023 26 0.58
12 Graig, S. 1992 2000 9 1.33
8 Berger, Frederic 2001 2010 10 0.8
8 Kaltunow, Anna M. 1995 2015 11 0.55
6 Bilodeau, P. 1996 2000 5 1.2
5 Helliwell, Chris 1996 2013 8 0.63
5 Smith, G.R. 1984 1986 3 1.67
4 Zhang, Hongyu 2013 2023 11 0.36
4 Finnegan, E. 1996 2023 28 0.14
3 Raikhel N.V. 1999 1999 1 3.00
3 Upadhyaya, N. 1999 2007 9 0.33
3 Glover, J. 1996 1998 3 1.00
3 Signer, E.R. 1989 1994 6 0.50
3 Bloemer, K.C. 1996 1996 1 3.00
2 Chin-Atkins, A.N. 1996 2001 6 0.33
2 Amundsen, S.B.K. 1984 1986 3 0.67
2 Brettel, R.I.S. 1991 1994 4 0.5
2 Farrell, L.B. 1996 1996 1 2.00
2 Knox, R.B. 1994 1998 5 0.4
2 Lavithis, M. 1994 1998 5 0.4
2 Singh, M.B. 1994 1998 5 0.4
2 Taylor, A.F. 1984 1986 3 0.67
2 Taylor, P.E. 1994 1998 5 0.4
2 Sundaresan, Venkatesan 1999 1999 1 2.00
2 Hocart, C. 1996 2000 5 0.4
2 Letham, D.S. 1993 2000 8 0.25
2 Lohe, A.R. 2002 2002 1 2.00
2 Luo, Mingzhu 2007 2008 2 1.00
2 MacIntosh, G.C. 1999 1999 1 2.00
2 Ming, L. 1995 1997 3 0.67
2 Nogue, F. 2000 2000 1 2.00
2 Okada, Kiyotaka 1999 1999 1 2.00
2 Wu, Xianjun 2017 2023 7 0.28
2 Wu, Xiaoba 2017 2023 7 0.29
2 Xie, Liqiong 2017 2023 7 0.29
112 112 authors 1paper each 1 year each 1 paper per year
Tota l 149 co-authors
Abbreviations: PWA= Papers with Chaudhury, FPY= First Publication Year, LPY= Last Publication Year, P/Y= Paper per year; ** could not be ascertained.
Table 6: List of name wise prominent co-authors’ publications and aliations.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024328
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Table 7: Preferred Channel of Publications.
Sl. No. Content-carriers TP %-age C-%-
age
FPY LPY Country FP IP
Gr. A Journal Articles (JA: 77.95%)
1 Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America.
7 10.29 10.29 1984 2005 USA JA 11.100
2 e Plant journal: for cell and molecular
biology
5 7.35 17.64 1993 2017 USA JA 7.091
3e Plant Cell 3 4.42 22.06 1999 2002 USA JA 12.085
4 Australian J. Plant Physiol. 3 4.42 1992 1996 Australia JA 3.000
5 Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3 4.42 1998 2002 Netherlands JA 9.600
6 Plant Physiology 3 4.42 35.32 1995 1998 UK JA 8.005
7 Genetics 2 2.94 2008 2010 USA JA 4.402
8 Plant Growth Regul. 2 2.94 2000 2000 USA JA 4.800
9 Trends in plant science 2 2.94 2005 2009 Netherlands JA 20.500
10 Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 2 2.94 1989 1996 USA JA 2.100
11 Sexual Plant Reproduction 2 2.94 1994 1999 USA JA **
12 Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 2 2.94 52.96 1996 2001 Netherlands JA 6.138
13 Annual review of cell and developmental
biology,
1 1.47 2001 2001 USA JA 11.300
14 Cold spring Harbor Symposium of
Quantitative Biology
1 1.47 1984 1984 USA JA **
15 Current Biology 1 1.47 2001 2001 USA JA 10.900
16 Development 1 1.47 2001 2001 UK JA 4.600
17 Journal of Bacteriology 1 1.47 1985 1985 USA JA 3.200
18 Molecular and General genetics 1 1.47 1985 1985 USA JA 3.100
19 Nature 1 1.47 2005 2005 UK JA 64.800
20 Plant Cell Reports 1 1.47 1989 1989 Germany JA 4.57
21 Journal of Experimental Botany 1 1.47 2015 2015 UK JA 7.298
22 Journal of genetics and genomics 1 1.47 2013 2013 Netherlands JA 5.900
23 Molecular plant 1 1.47 2009 2009 USA JA 12.084
24 Nature Plants. 1 1.47 2023 2023 UK JA 15.793
25 Plant Research 1 1.47 1999 1999 USA JA 2.800
26 Plant 1 1.47 1996 1996 Switzerland JA 4.500
27 Planta 1 1.47 1998 1998 Germany JA 4.300
28 PloS one. 1 1.47 2008 2008 USA JA 3.700
29 eoretical and Applied Genetics 1 1.47 77.95 1991 1991 Germany 4.439
Gr. B Composite Books (CB: 13.23%)
30 e LS (Encyclopedia of Life Sciences) 4 5.88 83.83 1999 2001 USA CB
31 Apomixis: exploiting hybrid vigor in rice
(edited by Gurdev S. Khush).
1 1.47 1994 1994 Philippines CB
32 Arabidopsis: An Atlas of Morphology and
Development, Eds, Bowman, J. (Springer, New
York).
1 1.47 1994 1994 USA
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 329
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
by composite books (13.23%), conference proceedings (7.35%)
and so on. His largest number of JA has published in his favorite
journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America (N7, 10.29%), and e Plant journal: for
cell and molecular biology (N5, 7.35%). A class of journals like e
Plant Cell, Australian J. Plant Physiol., Current Opinion in Plant
Biology, Plant Physiology has published 3 papers (4.42%) each. In
addition, a group of journals where he published 2 papers each
in the journals Genetics, Plant Growth Regul., Plant Molecular
Biology Reporter, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, etc.
Another category of 17 journals has been placed his 17 papers
(i.e., 1 paper in each journal). Out of six composite books, e LS
(Encyclopedia of Life Sciences) has published as many as 4 papers
(5.88%). Rest is published in another 12 publication channels
including Composite Books (CB), Conference Proceedings (CP)
and others. Many of his papers are accepted by highly impact
factor generated journals which are shown in the last column of
the Table 7.
Publications by Country
Total 38 i.e., 56% of his papers have appeared in dierent
publication channels that emanated from USA. Apart from it,
his papers have published from Netherlands (8, 11.77%), UK (8,
11.77%), Australia, Germany, ailand, Austria, China, Finland,
Philippines, and Switzerland. Place of publication (CNF) for one
paper could not be ascertained.
33 Genetic Recombination in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, Eds J. Strathern and Amar Klar.
Published by Cold Spring Harbour laboratory.
1 1.47 1986 1986 USA
34 Managing Plant Genetic Diversity by V.
Ramanatha Rao, A. H. D. Brown, M. Jackson.
Publisher CABI Publishing.
1 1.47 2002 2002 UK CB
35 Rice functional genomics: challenges, progress
and prospects.
1 1.47 91.18 2007 2007 USA CB
Gr. C Conference Proceedings
(CP 7.35%)
36 Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture
2006 and Beyond: Proceedings of the 11th
IAPTC&B Congress, Beijing, China.
1 1.47 2007 2007 China CP
37 ISHS Acta Horticulture 560: IV International
Symposium on In Vitro Culture and
Horticultural Breeding.
1 1.47 2000 2000 Finland CP
38 Proceedings of 17th world congress of soil
science: Abstracts volume IV, Department of
Land Development, Bangkok (ailand)…
1 1.47 2002 2002 ailand CP
39 Proceedings of an International Symposium
on the Use of Induced Mutations and
Molecular Techniques for Crop Improvement,
International Atomic Energy Agency.
1 1.47 1995 1995 Austria CP
40 Abstracts, General Meeting of the International
Programme on Rice Biotechnology, Phuket,
ailand.
1 1.47 98.53 1999 1999 ailand CP
Gr. D Others (OT: 1.47%)
42 521 NB-LRRs work a “bait and switch” on
pathogens 530 Confronting Maxwell’s demon:
biophysics of xylem embolism repair.
1 1.47 100 n.d. n.d. ** ** **
Tota l 68 100
Abbreviations: TP = Total papers; FPY=First publication year; LPY= Last publication year; JA= Journal articles; CB= Composite books; CP= Conference proceedings;
IP= Impact factors; n. d. = date of publication not found; ** could not be ascertained. C-%age = Cumulative percentage; FP = Form of publications.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024330
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Sl.
No.
Title of paper Communication
channels (Year)
Times Cited
or Total
citation (TC)
Ranks (AP)
As on
2024
Citation Growth Rate
=
TC/AP
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
01 Fertilization independent
seed development in
Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A. (1997)
631 0 177 1 - 3 28 22.54 -- 6.32
02 Miniseed3 (MINI3), a wrky
family gene, and HAIKU2
(IKU2), a leucine-rich
repeat (LRR) kinase gene,
are regulators of seed size in
Arabidopsis.
Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences of the United
States of America
(2005)
600 485 242 2 2 1 20 30.00 24.25 12.10
03 Genes controlling
fertilization-independent seed
development in Arabidopsis
thaliana.
Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences of the United
States of America
(1999)
565 510 161 3 1 4 26 21.73 19.62 6.19
04 Interaction and parent-of-
origin eects for FIS2, MEA,
and FIE in the endosperm
and embryo of developing
Arabidopsis seeds
Proc Natl Acad Sci,
USA (2000)
532 0 0 4 - - 25 21,28 -- --
05 Expression and parent-of-
origin eects for FIS2, MEA,
and FIE in the endosperm
and embryo of developing
Arabidopsis seeds.
Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences (2000)
531 445 180 5 3 2 25 21.24 17.80 7.20
Table 8: Top 23 scholarly cited works of Chaudhury (which received 100+ citations).
Citation Analysis
Highly Cited Scholarly Works and Citation Growth Rate (CGR)
Table 8 enlists highly cited 23 articles (out of 68) which have
received more than 100 citations in GS and counts rate of
CGR in online three indexing databases Google Scholar (GS),
ResearchGate (RG), and PubMed (PM). From the data set,
it is observed that the article “Fertilization independent seed
development in Arabidopsis thaliana” has ranked rst in GS
(631citations), third in PM (177 citations) and no citation
received in RG for the paper; corresponding CGRs are 22.54
in GS, and 6.32 in PM. e second one “Miniseed3 (MINI3), a
WRKY family gene, and HAIKU2 (IKU2), …, are regulators of seed
size in Arabidopsis” has cited by others 600 times (CGR 30.00) and
ranked 2nd in GS, 485 times (CGR 24.25) and ranked 2nd in RG,
and 242 times (CGR 12.12) and ranked 1st in PM. It is remarkable
that the second paper shows a rise in the rate of CGR in GS, RG
and PM respectively. Over all, amount of citation received and
rate of CGR of most of the papers are high in GS throughout the
study followed by RG and PM. us, his top 23 scholarly works
have considered for CGR, and a CGR graph has been drawn in
the Figure 3 with the values found in GS, RG and PM.
Citations Received Pattern
Table 9 shows citation received Chaudhury and his collaborative
authors according to the range of citation distribution. It is
seen that maximum number of papers i.e., 23 have received the
citation range more than100 in GS, 25 papers’ and 31 papers’
citation range =0 in RG, and PM respectively. Fourteen (N14)
papers in GS have not received any citations whereas 17 papers
in RG and 8 papers in PM have received the citation range more
than 100 respectively. It also enumerates that rates of citation per
article are 11.91 in GS, 78.35 in RG and 31.16 in PM. On average
he has received 202.55, 133.20 and 52.98 per year in GS, RG and
PM respectively.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 331
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Sl.
No.
Title of paper Communication
channels (Year)
Times Cited
or Total
citation (TC)
Ranks (AP)
As on
2024
Citation Growth Rate
=
TC/AP
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
06 amp1‐a mutant with high
cytokinin levels and altered
embryonic pattern, faster
vegetative growth, constitutive
photomorphogenesis and
precocious owering
e Plant Journal
(1993)
410 347 0 6 4 - 32 12.81 10.84 --
07 Genetic analysis of seed coat
development in Arabidopsis.
Trends in plant
science (2005)
388 320 125 7 5 6 20 19.40 16.00 6.25
08 e gene for an essential
subunit of Exonuclease V.
Proceedings of the
national Academy of
Science, USA (1986)
337 295 139 8 6 5 39 8.64 7.56 3.56
09 PEMU: an improved
promoter for gene expression
in cereal cells.
eoretical and
Applied Genetics
(1991)
328 199 43 9 10 14 34 9.65 5.85 1.26
10 Apomixis: molecular
strategies for the generation
of genetically identical seeds
without fertilization.
Plant Physiology
(1995)
316 198 36 10 11 16 30 10.53 6.60 1.20
11 Control of early seed
development.
Annual review of cell
and developmental
biology (2001)
270 203 90 11 9 9 24 11.25 8.46 3.75
12 e VQ Motif protein IKU1
regulates endosperm growth
and seed size in Arabidopsis.
e Plant journal: for
cell and molecular
biology (2010)
264 218 114 12 8 7 15 17.60 14.53 7.60
13 A new class of Escherichia
coli recBC mutants:
Implications for the role
of RecBC enzyme in
homologous recombination.
Proceedings of the
national Academy of
Science, USA (1984)
244 223 102 13 7 8 41 5.95 5.44 2.49
14 Expression, Imprinting, and
Evolution of Rice Homologs
of the Polycomb Group
Genes.
Molecular plant
(2009)
212 197 80 14 12 10 16 13.25 12.31 5.00
15 e Arabidopsis AMP1 Gene
Encodes a Putative Glutamate
Carboxypeptidase.
e Plant cell (2001) 211 152 63 15 13 11 24 8.79 6.33 2.63
16 Cloning and characterization
of MS5 from Arabidopsis: a
gene critical for male meiosis.
e Plant Journal
(1998)
177 133 45 16 14 13 27 6.55 4.93 1.67
17 Fruit Development is actively
restricted in the absence of
fertilization in Arabidopsis
Development (2001) 162 130 49 17 15 12 24 6.75 5.42 2.04
18 Nuclear genes controlling
male fertility.
Plant Cell (1993) 158 109 31 18 16 19 32 4.94 3.41 0.97
19 Polycomb group genes
control pattern formation in
Plant seed
Current Biology
(2001)
145 133 49 19 14 12 24 6.04 5.54 2.04
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024332
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Sl.
No.
Title of paper Communication
channels (Year)
Times Cited
or Total
citation (TC)
Ranks (AP)
As on
2024
Citation Growth Rate
=
TC/AP
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
20 Increased endogenous
cytokinin in theArabidopsis
amp1mutant corresponds
with de-etiolation responses.
Plant (1996) 129 87 20 20 18 20 29 4.45 3.00 0.69
21 Role of Escherichia coli recBC
enzyme in SOS induction.
Molecular and
General genetics
(1985)
113 98 35 21 17 17 40 2.83 2.45 0.88
22 Roles of recBC enzyme and
Chi sites in homologous
recombination.
Cold spring Harbor
Symposium of
Quantitative Biology
(1984)
108 0 41 22 - 15 41 2.63 -- 1.00
23 Parental memories shape
seeds.
Trends in plant
science (2009)
103 85 34 23 19 18 16 6.44 5.31 2.13
No. of Citation
received
Number of publications
(frequency) (TP)
%-age of publications Total Citations (TC)
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
Up to 0 14 25 31 20.59 36.76 45.58 -- -- --
1-10 6 4 6 8.82 5.88 8.82 22 23 29
11-20 6 4 5 8.82 5.88 7.35 92 60 80
21-30 4 5 5 5.88 7.35 7.35 99 132 `139
31-40 3 3 5 4.41 4.41 7.35 105 104 171
41-50 2 2 5 2.94 2.94 7.35 87 92 227
51-60 2 2 -- 2.94 2.94 -- 116 109 --
61-70 2 1 1 2.94 1.48 1.48 124 65 63
71-80 2 1 1 2.94 1.48 1.48 149 78 80
81-90 1 2 1 1.48 2.94 1.48 87 172 90
91-100 3 2 - 4.41 2.94 -- 287 196 -
Above 100 23 17 8 33.83 25.00 11.76 6934 4297 1240
Tota l 68 68 68 100 100 100 8102 5328 2119
Citations per article=
TC/TP
11.91 78.35 31.16
Paper productive age
= PPA (years)
40 40 40
Citations per year =
TC/ PPA
202.55 133.20 52.98
Table 9: Ranking of publications by number of citations received.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 333
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Relative Citation Impact
Dierent values of the Relative Citation Impact (RCI) in GS, RG
and PM for Chaudhury has enumerated in Table 10. e highest
RCI values are 5.29 in GS, 5.68 in PM in 1997; 3.49 in RG in
2005. On other hand, the lowest RCI values are counted 0.01 in
RG, 0.05 in PM and 0.11 in GS for the year 2023, 1989 and 2002
respectively.
Relative Un-cited Index (RUI) and Comparison
among GS, RG and PM
Table 11 shows Relative Un-cited Index (RUI) and Comparison
among GS, RG and PM. Out of total, there are some uncited
papers of Chaudhury viz., 14 (20.58%) in GS, 25 (36.76%) in RG
and 31(45.58%) in PM during 1984-2023. It has also enumerated
RUI values in this study and values lie between 0.01 and 0.05 in
GS, RG and PM.
Year TP %
of
TP
Cited papers (CP) Citation received Citation per
paper = TC/CP
Relative Citation
Impact (RCI)
=% of TC/% of TP
Total citation (TC) &% -age
GS RG PM
GS RG PM TC %TC %TC % GS RG PM GS RG PM
1984
2
2.94 2 1 2 352 4.34 223 4.19 143 6.75 176 223 71.5 1.51 1.43 2.29
1985
2
2.94 2 2 2 206 2.54 196 3.68 70 3.3 103 98 35 0.86 1.25 1.12
1986
2
2.94 1 1 1 337 4.16 295 5.54 139 6.55 337 295 139 1.41 1.88 2.23
1989
2
2.94 2 1 1 43 0.54 16 0.3 3 0.15 21.5 16 3 0.18 0.10 0.05
1991
1
1.47 1 1 1 328 4.05 199 3.74 43 2.03 328 199 43 2.75 2.54 1.38
1992
1
1.47 0 1 0 0 0 29 0.55 0 0 0 29 0 0 0.37 0
1993
2
2.94 2 2 1 568 7.03 456 8.55 31 1.46 284 228 31 2.39 2.91 0.49
1994
4
5.88 2 1 1 102 1.26 5 0.09 28 1.34 51 5 28 0.21 0.12 0.22
1995
2
2.94 2 1 1 338 4.17 198 3.72 36 1.69 169 198 36 1.42 1.26 0.57
1996
4
5.88 4 3 1 213 2.63 147 2.76 20 0.95 53.25 49 20 0.45 0.46 0.16
1997
1
1.47 1 0 1 631 7.78 0 0 177 8.35 631 0 177 5.29 0 5.68
1998
5
7.36 3 2 3 330 4.07 211 3.97 89 4.2 110 105.5 29.67 0.55 0.54 0.57
1999
7
10.29 5 4 3 668 8.24 598 11.24 184 8.68 133.6 149.5 61.33 0.80 1.09 0.84
2000
5
7.36 5 4 1 1150 14.19 519 9.74 180 8.49 230 129.75 180 1.92 1.32 1.15
2001
8
11.77 6 4 5 876 10.82 618 11.59 280 13.21 146 154.5 56 0.92 0.98 1.12
2002
4
5.88 3 1 2 53 0.65 35 0.65 9 0.43 17.67 35 4.5 0.11 0.11 0.07
2005
3
4.42 3 3 3 1011 12.47 824 15.46 372 17.55 337 274.66 124 2.82 3.49 3.97
2007
2
2.94 1 1 0 71 0.87 43 0.8 0 0 71 43 0 0.29 0.27 0
2008
2
2.94 2 2 2 140 1.74 122 2.28 54 2.55 70 61 27 0.59 0.77 0.86
2009
2
2.94 2 2 2 315 3.88 282 5.29 114 5.37 157.5 141 57 1.32 1.79 1.82
2010
2
2.94 2 2 2 302 3.72 251 4.72 130 6.14 151 125.5 65 1.26 1.61 2.08
2013
1
1.47 1 1 1 16 0.19 13 0.25 5 0.25 16 13 5 0.13 0.17 0.17
2015
1
1.47 1 1 1 17 0.22 21 0.39 12 0.56 17 21 12 0.13 0.26 0.38
2017
1
1.47 1 1 0 35 0.44 26 0.48 0 0 53 26 0 0.29 0.32 0
2023
1
1.47 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.02 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.01 0
YNF 1 1.47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota l 68 100 54 43 37 8102 100 5328 100 2119 100 --- --- --- --- --- ---
Table 10: Relative citation impact comparison between GS, PM and RG.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024334
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
Year
[1]
Total
Papers
[2]
%-age
[3]
Un-cited paper Relative
Un-cited Index
(RUI)
(comparison)=
5/3
Total [4] Ratio = citation
/ total uncited
paper
[5]
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
1984 2 2.94 - 1 0 -- 0.04 -- -- 0.01
1985 2 2.94 - - - -- -- -- -- -- --
1986 2 2.94 1 1 1 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01
1989 2 2.94 - 1 1 -- 0.04 0.03 -- 0.01 0.01
1991 1 1.47 - - - -- -- -- -- - --
1992 1 1.47 1 - 1 0.07 -- 0.03 0.05 -- 0.02
Table 11: Related un-cited index in GS, RG and PM.
Figure 2: Quinquennium wise publications and peak period.
Figure 3: Citation Growth Rate in GS, RG & PM.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024 335
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
CONCLUSION
Chaudhury’s Panchabrihi is a groundbreaking discovery of
the 21st century for human kind. Its multiple productions may
reduce food crisis in Bangladesh, India, Australia and other
rice-feeding countries. e new and uncommon paddy seed is
more productive and so the scientist expects it will be very helpful
for Bangladeshi farmers. Because most of the areas in Bangladesh
are ooded and draughty and hence cultivation cannot be
possible properly there. It can be solved rice crisis especially in
Bangladesh and India. Weather more and less is same in both
the countries. Panchabrihi grows huge number of roots in the
ground which help to produce carbon in soil that can improve the
quality of the soil. is method he himself has been applying in
his native village along with the local farmers of Bangladesh. For
this purpose, there is an agricultural rm in his village ‘Kanihati.
Cultivation of panchabrihi is cost saving method than multiple
harvested seeds as it is once planted and yields ve times with
a good quantity throughout the year from the same plant. He
has already generated nearly 300 new types of paddy seed. He
has started his research works at the grass root level where poor,
hardworking people i.e., farmers are living and thus civilization
grows from the agriculture at the village level. Where agriculture
is the foundation of the countries like Bangladesh, India, etc.,
his works in agriculture science is very much remarkable and
Panchabrihi is also a revolutionary discovery in the world.
Chaudhury, a scientist, writer, poet, well-wisher and social
reformer, in a word, a multi-purposeful ideal man who can only
look at the people living at the grass root level, fell their crisis
and up li their level using agricultural products. It is considered
a landmark innovation in terms of preventing food crisis
throughout year. us, for his outstanding works, Chaudhury is
regarded as one of the most leading gures in modern biology. He
has manifold experiences in genetics, crop breeding, molecular
Year
[1]
Total
Papers
[2]
%-age
[3]
Un-cited paper Relative
Un-cited Index
(RUI)
(comparison)=
5/3
Total [4] Ratio = citation
/ total uncited
paper
[5]
GS RG PM GS RG PM GS RG PM
1993 2 2.94 - - 1 -- -- 0.03 -- -- 0.01
1994 4 5.88 2 3 3 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02
1995 2 2.94 0 1 1 -- 0.04 0.03 -- 0.01 0.01
1996 4 5.88 0 1 3 -- 0.04 0.09 -- 0.01 0.02
1997 1 1.47 0 1 0 -- 0.04 -- -- 0.03 --
1998 5 7.36 2 3 2 0.14 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.01
1999 7 10.29 2 3 4 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.01
2000 5 7.36 0 1 4 -- 0.04 0.13 -- 0.01 0.02
2001 8 11.77 2 4 3 0.14 0.15 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01
2002 4 5.88 1 3 2 0.07 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.01
2005 3 4.42 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2007 2 2.94 1 1 2 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.02
2008 2 2.94 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2009 2 2.94 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2010 2 2.94 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2013 1 1.47 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2015 1 1.47 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- --
2017 1 1.47 0 0 1 -- -- 0.03 -- -- 0.02
2023 1 1.47 1 0 1 0.07 -- 0.03 0.04 -- 0.02
YNF* 1 1.47 1 1 1 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02
Tota l 68 100 14 25 31 -- -- -- -- -- --
%-age 20.58 36.76 45.58 -- -- -- -- -- --
*YNF= Year not found.
Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, Vol 3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec, 2024336
Koley: A Scientometric Portrait of Dr. Abed Chaudhury
biology, human nutrition and biotech (Alam, 2023). is study is
a respectful gratitude with the highlights of various scientometric
indicators of research activities. He has produced 68 research
publications in 40 years of his research career during 1984-2023.
Out of various communication channels, nearly 78% papers have
been scattered in highly impact 29 journals. He received many
honours, achievements and grants for his research work from
several organizations and funding agencies. He has received
many citations in Google Scholar (GS) and Citation Growth rate
is high in GS. He has received maximum citation from his article
“Miniseed3 (MINI3), a wrky family gene, and HAIKU2 (IKU2), a
leucine-rich repeat (LRR) kinase gene, are regulators of seed size
in Arabidopsis. His production was peaked in 2001 at the age of
46. However, along with Panchabrihi, FIS, a colorful corn is also
included in the list of his discoveries. is colorful corn is one of
the best nutritious meals for child health as well as anti-diabetic
and anti-cancer food.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My heartiest tribute to Late Prof. (Dr.) B N Koley, an emeritus
Professor of Physiology, Rajabazar Science College, University
of Calcutta, and a great personality in role of promotion of
electrophysiology in India, who inspired me to study library and
information science.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
e author declares that there is no conict of interest.
REFERENCES
Alam, R. (2023). Dr Abed Chaudhury: The discoverer of “Panchabrihi” rice cultivation.
Financial Express. https://thenancialexpress.com.bd/lifestyle/others/
dr-abed-chaudhury-the-discoverer-of-panchabrihi-rice-cultivation
ATSE. (2022). Abed Chaudury. https://www.atse.org.au/activate-2022-speakers/
abed-chaudury/
Bengal Institute. (2024). Abed Chaudhury. Scientist, Writer, Visiting & Regular Faculty.
https://bengal.institute/team/abed-chaudhury/
Billah, M. (2023). Panchabrihi: How practical is a “ve-yield-a-year” rice?. ttps:.
Tbsnews-panorama. http://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/
panchabrihi-how-practical-ve-yield-year-rice-721922
Dhaka. (2024). Genofax aims Bangladesh for big data driven medicine. ht
tps://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/330736/genofax-aims-bangladesh-for-
big-data-driven. La Tribune.
Bengal byte. (2022). Biography of Scientist Abed Chaudhury in Bengali. https:/
/bengalbyte.in/byte/biography-of-scientist-abed-chaudhury-in-bengali-6mnzz24w
The Daily Star. (2023). Bangladeshi scientist discovers “Panchabrihi”, new method
of rice cultivation. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/tech-startup
/news/bangladeshi-scientist-discovers-panchabrihi-new-method-rice-cultivation-3
443396
Dutta, B. (2019). Biobiliometric potrait of B K Sen, A librarian, information scientist and
sientometrician. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(1), 1–21.
DOI:10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.1
Knowledge hub. (2020). The enlighten one – Dr. Abed Chaudhur y. https://www.yout
ube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Tdlu5P6h1g4&t=45s
Everybodywiki.com. (2023). Abed Chaudhury. https://en.everybodywiki.com
/Abed_Chaudhury
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022). Agricultural production statistics, 2020–
2021: FAOSTAT Analytical Brief 60. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/
58971ed8-c831-4ee6-ab0a-e47ea66a7e6a/content
Gfmdhaka.com. (2022). Paddy ve times in one plant: Innovation of Bangladeshi
scientist. https://gfmdhaka.com/news/paddy-ve-times-in-one-plant-
innovation-of-bangladeshi-scientist-1
Jain, P., & Meera. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of research outputs of national council of
educational research and training [IASLIC bulletin], 67(3) (pp. 131–145).
Kanihati.com. (2003). Professional resume of Dr. Abed M (Abed) Chaudhury. http://k
anihati.com/aboutme/2003CVAbed_Chaudhury.doc
Koley, S., & Sen, B. K. (2016). Biobibliometric portrait of V L Kalyane, a Steller
biobibliometrician. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(2), 161–175.
Mondal, A. K. (2021). A bibliometric study on DC, RGT, and DT of publications and
citations of ISTL journal during 2010–2020. Library Philosophy and Practice
(e-journal), 5672. Retrieved March 16, 2024. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphi
lprac/5672/.
Mondal, D., & Raychoudhury, N. (2017). Contribution of Jadavpur University in S & T as
reected in WoS Dataase during 2006–2015 IASLIC Bulletin, 62(3), 161–172.
Rice news today. (2024). Panchabrihi: How practical is a ‘ve-yield-a-year’ rice? h
ttps://ricenewstoday.com/panchabrihi-how-practical-is-a-ve-yield-a-year-rice/
Rao, I. K. (2013). From Librametry to Webometric Research in India with Emphasis on the
Work done since 2001. SRELS Jourbal of Information Management, 50(5), 479–520.
Sawale, A. O., & Mete, M. V. (2021). Research publications in computer science: A
scientometric study IASLIC Bulletin, 66(1), 43–48.
Shahbandeh, M. (2024). Rice – Statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/to
pics/1443/rice/#topicOverview. Statista.com
Shelembe, N., Hlatshwayo, S. I., Modi, A., Mabhaudhi, T., & Ngidi, M. S. C. (2024).
The Association of Socio-Economic Factors and Indigenous Crops on the
Food Security Status of Farming Households in KwaZulu-Natal Province.
Agriculture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture, 14(3), 415. DOI: 10
.3390/agriculture14030415
Sidlingappa, H. M. et al. (2023). Professor Madhav Gadgil: A bibliometric portrait. Data Sci.
Info. Citation Studies, 2(3), 243–254. DOI: 10.5530/jcitation.2.3.32
Tasnim, R. (2023). Two Bangladeshi scientists’ AI tech that can predict diabetes.
The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/tech-startup/news/
two-bangladeshi-scientists-ai-tech-can-predict-diabetes-3467871
Teli, S., & Maity, A. (2021). A bibliometric portrait of Stephen William howking IASLIC
Bulletin, 66(2), 122–128.
Wikipedia. (2024). History of Agriculture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi
story_of_agriculture.
Cite this article: Koley S. Dr. Abed Chaudhury, Bangladeshi-Australian Gene Scientist: A Scientometric Portrait. Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and
Citation Studies. 2024;3(3):317-36.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Indigenous crops have been proposed as part of a solution for household food security and sustainable farming systems. However, they have been overlooked and underutilised by households and farmers despite their potential contribution to household food security. The objective of this paper was to determine the association of socio-economic factors and indigenous crops with the household food security of farming households. About 260 farming households were selected using a simple random sampling procedure. The food security status was measured through the use of the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). The Chi-square test and extended ordered probit regression model assessed the relationship of socio-economic factors and indigenous crops with household food security status. The results from the HFIAS showed that farming households were largely in the mildly and moderately food-insecure categories, with 34.2% and 36.2% of the sampled farmers found in these categories, respectively. The Chi-square test showed a statistically significant relationship between food security status and socio-economic factors. Young men and everyone were perceived to be the ones likely to consume indigenous crops. Consumption of indigenous crops was perceived to be associated with food security. The results also showed that farming experience is likely to positively contribute to the food security status of the farming households. Selling indigenous crops in a formal market is perceived to be associated with food security compared to selling in an informal market. This study concludes that consuming indigenous crops is likely associated with improved food security. Identifying an appropriate market for sales of indigenous crops is imperative. Government, extension officers, and nutritionists must conduct training workshops to encourage households to grow, market and buy indigenous crops. Government and policymakers need to include indigenous crops in the national food and nutrition security policy and create formal markets for indigenous crops.
Article
Full-text available
Bibliometrics is an essential tool in perceiving the achievements of scholars. The purpose of these studies is to provide a comprehensive overview of the research findings, impacts, and collaborations of researchers. By analyzing publication records, citation data, and other relevant metrics, Bibliometric portraits shed light on the scholarly contributions of individuals in various fields. One of the critical objectives of Bibliometric portraits is to inspire and motivate others to pursue careers in various fields. By showcasing the accomplishments of renowned scholars, these portraits can serve as role models and sources of inspiration for aspiring researchers. They demonstrate what can be achieved through dedication, hard work, and commitment. The present study focuses on measuring the contributions of Professor Madhav Gadgil in the field of ecology. Throughout his 49-year publishing career, Gadgil wrote 89 publications, collectively receiving 4119 citations. Notably, 63 out of 89 (70.78%) of his publications resulted from collaborations with other researchers. Among his collaborators, Gadgil has had the most active partnership with NV Joshi, who co-authored 12 publications. Other notable collaborators include R Guha, (6 publications) and G Utkarsh (5). Most of his collaborations (72) have been with researchers from India. Additionally, he has collaborated with researchers from Canada in 5 publications. Gadgil's publications have garnered a cumulative total of 4119 citations, resulting in an average of 46.28 citations per publication and an average of 84.06 per year. Notably, he wrote the highest number of articles (13) in Current Science and has shown a prolific output in 1996 and 1999, with 6 publications each.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Stephen William Hawking is a renowned scientist worked in several fields of physics and the allied sciences. He has contributed 173 research papers during the span of 1965 to 2018. This paper tries to depict a quantitative analysis of his research contribution through a bibliometric study and endeavor to draw a scientific portrait of this fame of scientist. Methodology: Research data has been collected from Web of Science and Scopus bibliographic databases and then analyzed following standard procedure for preparing scientific portrait. Findings: Stephen William Hawking has contributed 173 research papers in 53 years of his research career. He has contributed maximum number of publication in the journal Physical Review D and some other important inferences have been drawn from the analysis. Originality/Value: We have not observed any scientometric portrait on Stephen Hawking and it is high time to quantitatively asses the contribution of this famous author and in this regard this is an original and important. Keywords: Bibliometrics, scientometrics, scientometric portrait, Stephen William Hawking.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study is to quantify, to evaluate and to access the scientific research output in computer science showing the nature of its publication in India. Methodology: In order to access scientific research in Computer Science, the Scopus -based SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR) is taken as the source of information for the study. The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific Indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus database. The information Acquired from SCImago was analysis using MS-Excel. Findings: The rapid growth of scientific publication in computer science over the last decade is observed. It is found that Relative Growth Rate (RGR) lies between 0.19 to 0.81. It is reduced while doubling time (DT) is increasing proportionately. The research output in Computer Science on an average was 12790 papers annually. Major research publications are in Computer Network and Communication (20.04%) followed by Computer Science Application (17.61%), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (15.33%), Software (11.24%), Information System (7.22%) and Artificial Intelligence (7.14%). India being a developing country emerged as a major research contributor in the field of Computer Science. Value: This study is valuable for assessing the research productivity of India in Computer Science. Keywords: Computer Science; Scientometric study; SCImago; India
Article
Full-text available
This biobibliometric study highlights the major aspects of the career of the Indian librarian and information scientist, Bimal Kanti Sen. As a professional librarian, he took major initiatives toenhance practical scientometric programs in India. He has contributed 390 writings since 1964 to 2018, i.e. over 55 years,including his service and retirement period. He authored seven writings per year on an average. Of the 390 writings, 184 are research articles, which means he contributed about three papers per year consistently over hisentire career period. Other than research articles, his contributions include technical and popular articles
Article
This paper presents a bibliometric study on DC, RGT, and DT of Publications and Citations of ISTL Journal during 2010-2020. The study was based on 224 articles published in ISTL Journal during the years 2010-2020. This paper aims to analyze the Authorship distribution of the publication, degree of collaboration among authors, relative growth rate, and doubling time of publications and citations. It is found from the analysis that the degree of collaboration in ISTL publications is 0.5 i.e., equal to the standard DC. It means the progress of collaborative research neither slow nor so fast. It is in a balanced position. On the other hand, the relative growth rate is not in a stable position during the study period. The doubling time (Dt) rate for different years is increasing compared to the relative growth rate (RTG) during the study period. The relative growth rate of citations for the first three years i.e., 2010-2012 is the highest (mean value 0.45) and the rate of doubling time (Dt) of citations for different years is fluctuating.
Article
V L Kalyane is one of the pioneers of biobibliometric studies in India. This study presents scientometric analysis of 120 papers of Kalyane published during 1973-2009 with 338 co-authors. He has to his credit, 20 single-authored and 100 multiauthored papers. His studies covered 17 renowned scientists, 9 Nobel laureates and one philosopher. His highest productivity is about 7 papers per year during 1993-1997 when his age was between 39-43 years and second highest productivity is about 6 papers per year during 2003-2007 when his age was between 49-53 years. The highest productivity coefficient is 1.0 during 1978-81, 1996, 1999-2003 and 2005-2009. Kalyane had 50 collaborators of which Vijay Kumar, E R Prakasan, B S Kademani, Anil Sagar and Anil Kumar were the most active or core collaborators. He used 65 communication channels to disseminate the results of his research of which Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Sciences (11 papers) tops of the list followed by Annals of Library and Information Studies (7 papers), Scientometrics (6 papers), SRELS Journal of Information Management (6 papers) and http:/eprints.rclis.org/archive/(open access archives) (6 papers). The publication concentration is 30.77 and publication density 1.85. The most frequently used Keywords are scientometric portrait (25) followed by Nobel laureates (10). © 2016, National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR). All rights reserved.
Dr Abed Chaudhury: The discoverer of "Panchabrihi" rice cultivation. Financial Express
  • R Alam
Alam, R. (2023). Dr Abed Chaudhury: The discoverer of "Panchabrihi" rice cultivation. Financial Express. https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/lifestyle/others/ dr-abed-chaudhury-the-discoverer-of-panchabrihi-rice-cultivation ATSE. (2022). Abed Chaudury. https://www.atse.org.au/activate-2022-speakers/ abed-chaudury/
Abed Chaudhury. Scientist, Writer, Visiting & Regular Faculty
  • Bengal Institute
Bengal Institute. (2024). Abed Chaudhury. Scientist, Writer, Visiting & Regular Faculty. https://bengal.institute/team/abed-chaudhury/
Panchabrihi: How practical is a "five-yield-a-year" rice
  • M Billah
Billah, M. (2023). Panchabrihi: How practical is a "five-yield-a-year" rice?. ttps:. Tbsnews-panorama. http://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/ panchabrihi-how-practical-five-yield-year-rice-721922