Article

Assessment of Run-of-River Hydropower Potential Using SWAT Modeling and GIS in the Marsyangdi River Basin, Nepal

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the run-of-river (ROR) hydropower potential in the Marsyangdi River basin using the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) modeling and Arc GIS. Watershed delineation generates a river network, which provides information like stream link, stream order, stream length, and slope, considering the outlet at intake. The catchment area of the Marsyangdi River basin is 4787.86 km2. Intake points in the SWAT model were chosen with consideration for the head, the distance between the intake and the powerhouse, and the stream order of the river. Seventy-nine potential hydropower locations were identified based on these criteria. The SWAT model was run from 1982 to 2016 with a two-year warm-up period. Model calibration and validation were performed using SUFI-2 within SWAT-CUP by adjusting fifteen parameters. The model was calibrated from 2001 to 2009 and validated from 2010 to 2015. R2, NSE and PBIAS were the statistical indices used to evaluate the model’s performance. The corresponding values for calibration and validation based on mean monthly flow were 0.83, 0.765, -15.57% and 0.82, 0.82 and -2.82% respectively. For mean daily flow, the value of R2, NSE and PBIAS were 0.58, 0.55, 18.62% and 0.61, 0.56, 23.70% respectively. The hydropower potential was estimated at different exceedance probabilities based on mean daily flow and monthly flow. Based on the mean daily flow and flow duration curve, the results showed that the estimated hydropower potential at 40% and 30% probability of exceedance was 1568.96 MWand 2191.68 MW respectively.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This study assessed the hydropower potential of a mountain watershed within the Sunkoshi River basin in Sindhupalchok, Nepal, utilizing geographic information systems (GIS) and the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) hydrological model. Topographical, soil, land use, meteorological, and discharge data were employed to assess the study area for the appropriateness of hydropower generation. SWAT was utilized to delineate the Sunkoshi basin into 23 distinct subbasins and involved the creation of a detailed river network, incorporating various hydrological attributes including stream links, stream order, stream length, and slope gradient. After that, it was employed to simulate river discharges within these subbasins. The Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Version 2 (SUFI-2) algorithm, integrated within the SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP), was employed to calibrate and validate the model. This step involved the adjustment of 25 selected parameters to enhance the model’s accuracy and reliability in representing the hydrological processes of the Sunkoshi basin. Model performance was assessed utilizing three well-established efficiency criteria: coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.79), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE = 0.73), and percent bias (PBIAS = 17.59). The study identified 36 sites across streams of order 3, 4, and 5 as having potential for hydropower generation. The hydropower potential at each identified site was evaluated using estimated stream flow and topographical head at various probability of exceedance (PoE) levels (40%, 45%, 50%, and 60%). The aggregate hydropower potential of the basin was quantified, yielding a potential of 371.30 MW at a 40% PoE. The findings suggest that an integrated approach combining SWAT-based hydrological modeling within a GIS can accurately assess a river basin’s hydropower potential and provide insights into further evaluation of the comprehensive environmental assessment of the fragile Himalayan watersheds.
Article
Full-text available
The surprising difference in elevation present within a small width, no doubt gives enough head for hydropower generation in most of the rivers of Nepal. The hydropower potential of any river can be assessed by realistic, up to date and useful information from recent advances in remote sensing, geographic information system and hydrological modelling [1]. This research aims for the assessment of the RoR hydropower potential using spatial technology and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) modeling in Seti Gandaki River, Kaski, Nepal. The DEM, daily precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature data, discharge records, land use and soil data were used for the SWAT model setup and simulation. The model was calibrated (2000-2010) and validated (2011-2015) with model performance of 0.85 R2 , 0.85 ENS and 2.19 % PBAIS. One hundred seventy-one potential hydropower locations were identified that fulfilled the criterions of sufficient head (determined from DEM processing and analysis) and sufficient discharge. Then, validated SWAT model was used to simulate the river flow discharge at the potential hydropower points. The final potential locations were compared with the existing and under construction DoED (Department of Electricity Development) hydropower projects running along the Seti River for validity check. A total potential of 529.97 MW was obtained at 40 % exceedance in the Seti Gandaki River. Economic, environmental and social sustainability of each location were also examined. The study revealed that the hydropower potential of a river basin can be correctly assessed by employing a digital elevation model, stream network data and a hydrological model, such as the SWAT model, within a GIS framework.
Article
Full-text available
Lack of hydrological data of high spatiotemporal resolution has been a major challenge for understanding the rainfall‐runoff relationship on the Loess Plateau of China. In this study, we examined this relationship across 82 watersheds on the plateau for two time periods: P1 (1971–1987) and P2 (2008–2016). We found linear relationships between the annual rainfall series and annual surface runoff series in P1 that were stronger in the southeast and that declined toward the northwest, but this spatial pattern was slightly disrupted during P2. The mean annual runoff coefficient ranged from 0.056 to 0.126 for the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, during the P1 period, but the corresponding values were smaller in P2 (0.035 and 0.088, respectively). In total, the runoff coefficient decreased for 87% of the watersheds, with an average reduction of 0.033. For most watersheds of the plateau, we found a stable threshold value for the monthly runoff coefficient when monthly rainfall reached a certain value (i.e., a critical point). Between P1 and P2, the threshold value of the runoff coefficient decreased for 57 watersheds as a result of soil conservation measures. The rainfall critical point represents the minimum monthly rainfall to maintain the stable relationship between monthly infiltration and monthly rainfall in the process of runoff production. This value became greater on the middle regions of the plateau during P2 (increasing by 28% on average). Check dams, vegetation, and land use all have profoundly influenced the relationship between rainfall and surface runoff in this region.
Article
Full-text available
The need for electricity is rapidly increasing, especially in developing countries. There is vast hydropower potential existing globally that has not yet been explored. This could be the only solution to solve future global power shortage. Hydropower is a clean and renewable source of energy because it does not exploit the use of water. However, using the conventional approach to harness hydropower results in several challenges. It is difficult to identify suitable sites and assess site potential during the planning stage of hydropower projects. In this study, run-of-river hydropower potential for the Myitnge River Basin was estimated by intergrating a Geographic Information System (GIS) and Soil & Water Assessement Tool (SWAT) model. A GIS based tool was developed using Python to spot the potential locations of the hydropower plants. The hydrological model (SWAT) was designed in order to obtain the values of monthly discharge for all potential hydropwer sites. The flow duration curves at potential locations were developed and the design discharge for hydropower was identified. Forty-four run-of-river (ROR) type potential hydropower sites were identified by considering only the topographic factors. After simulation with SWAT model, twenty potential sites with a hydropower generation potential of 292 MW were identified. Currently, only one 790 MW Yeywa Hydropower Plant, which is the largest plant in Myanmar, exists in the Myitnge River Basin. The amount of estimated power generated from ROR may increase the existing power system of Myitnge Basin by 36%. This study will assist stakeholders in the energy sector to optimize the available resources to select appropiate sites for small hydropower plants with high power potential.
Article
Full-text available
Hydrological models are becoming more and more widespread, mainly due to their capacity to simulate the impact of environmental changes on water resources. In this way, the aim of this study was to calibrate and validate the SWAT model for the soil and climatic conditions of the Mucuri River Basin, located in the Northeast region of the States of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The SWAT-CUP software module SUFI2 was used to analyze the sensitivity, calibration and validation of the model. The calibration was performed in an intermediate fluviometric station and the validation in five other located: three upstream, one downstream and one independent from the calibration point. It was evidenced for the study area that the parameters referring to the basic flow processes were more sensitive. The model obtained a good adjustment with an overestimate tendency of 15%. In general, the SWAT model, using SWAT-CUP was good and adequate in terms of its calibration performance and validation of the flow simulation in the Mucuri River Basin by the determination coefficients, Nash-Suttclife efficiency and percentage of trend.
Article
Full-text available
The total hydropower potential of Nepal was assessed as 83,500 MW in 1966 by Dr. Hari Man Shrestha dur-ing his PhD research work in former USSR. Since then, no further study has been done in this feld. The hydropower potential estimate has been used by Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA), Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS) and Department of Electricity Development (DOED) for power development, licensing and policy making. However, keeping in view recent advancements in computer technology that offer many benefits to the field of water resources and the importance of power estimation in Nepal, Dr. Shrestha’s estimate needs further review and updat-ing. The present study has mainly used the hydro-meteorological data of Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM) for hydrological analysis of all the rivers in Nepal including the three big rivers, viz., Saptakoshi, Narayani and Karnali, and other medium and small rivers. Incorporating GIS and the Hydropower Model that has specifcally been developed by the author, the power potential and annual energy estimate on an run-of-the-river (ROR) basis of the entire country has been worked out. The result shows that the power potential and annual energy estimates of Na-rayani, Saptakoshi and Karnali River basins at Q40% (fow exceedence) and 80% efficiency are 17800, 17008, 15661 MW and 113373, 108817, 102324 GWh, respectively. The Mahakali River would yield only 2262 MW of hydropower and 14981 GWh of energy annually. The other water sources in Nepal would have a total power potential of 1105 MW and a combined annual energy of 7043 GWh. Thus, the total hydropower potential and corresponding annual energy capacity of Nepal on a ROR basis at Q40%, and 80% efficiency is 53,836 MW and 346538 GWh, respectively.Key words: Hydropower potential; Run-of-River (ROR); GIS; Hydropower Model; NepalDOI: 10.3126/hn.v7i0.4226Hydro Nepal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Vol 7, July, 2010Page: 8-13Uploaded date: 31 January, 2011
Article
Full-text available
Watershed models are powerful tools for simulating the effect of watershed processes and management on soil and water resources. However, no comprehensive guidance is available to facilitate model evaluation in terms of the accuracy of simulated data compared to measured flow and constituent values. Thus, the objectives of this research were to: (1) determine recommended model evaluation techniques (statistical and graphical), (2) review reported ranges of values and corresponding performance ratings for the recommended statistics, and (3) establish guidelines for model evaluation based on the review results and project-specific considerations; all of these objectives focus on simulation of streamflow and transport of sediment and nutrients. These objectives were achieved with a thorough review of relevant literature on model application and recommended model evaluation methods. Based on this analysis, we recommend that three quantitative statistics, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and ratio of the root mean square error to the standard deviation of measured data (RSR), in addition to the graphical techniques, be used in model evaluation. The following model evaluation performance ratings were established for each recommended statistic. In general, model simulation can be judged as satisfactory if NSE > 0.50 and RSR < 0.70, and if PBIAS + 25% for streamflow, PBIAS + 55% for sediment, and PBIAS + 70% for N and P. For PBIAS, constituent-specific performance ratings were determined based on uncertainty of measured data. Additional considerations related to model evaluation guidelines are also discussed. These considerations include: single-event simulation, quality and quantity of measured data, model calibration procedure, evaluation time step, and project scope and magnitude. A case study illustrating the application of the model evaluation guidelines is also provided.
Article
Full-text available
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is a continuation of nearly 30 years of modeling efforts conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service. SWAT has gained international acceptance as a robust interdisciplinary watershed modeling tool, as evidenced by international SWAT conferences, hundreds of SWAT-related papers presented at numerous scientific meetings, and dozens of articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The model has also been adopted as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's BASINS (Better Assessment Science Integrating Point & Nonpoint Sources) software package and is being used by many U.S. federal and state agencies, including the USDA within the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. At present, over 250 peer-reviewed, published articles have been identified that report SWAT applications, reviews of SWAT components, or other research that includes SWAT. Many of these peer-reviewed articles are summarized here according to relevant application categories such as streamflow calibration and related hydrologic analyses, climate change impacts on hydrology, pollutant load assessments, comparisons with other models, and sensitivity analyses and calibration techniques. Strengths and weaknesses of the model are presented, and recommended research needs for SWAT are provided.
Article
In this study, a hydrological model and spatial technologies have been employed to assess water availability in the Mat River basin, southern Mizoram, India. Furthermore, the results obtained from the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model, satellite data and GIS tools were utilized to identify the hydropower potential in the basin. Thirty three sites with hydropower potential were identified within 147 km² of the Mat River basin. A total of 3039, 1127 and 805 kW can be harnessed with 50, 75 and 90% dependability, respectively. The study revealed that the hydropower potential of a river basin can be correctly assessed by employing a digital elevation model, stream network data and a hydrological model, such as the SWAT model, within a GIS framework. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis
Article
SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) is a comprehensive, semi-distributed river basin model that requires a large number of input parameters, which complicates model parameterization and calibration. Several calibration techniques have been developed for SWAT, including manual calibration procedures and automated procedures using the shuffled complex evolution method and other common methods. In addition, SWAT-CUP was recently developed and provides a decision-making framework that incorporates a semi-automated approach (SUFI2) using both manual and automated calibration and incorporating sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. In SWAT-CUP, users can manually adjust parameters and ranges iteratively between autocalibration runs. Parameter sensitivity analysis helps focus the calibration and uncertainty analysis and is used to provide statistics for goodness-of-fit. The user interaction or manual component of the SWAT-CUP calibration forces the user to obtain a better understanding of the overall hydrologic processes (e.g., baseflow ratios, ET, sediment sources and sinks, crop yields, and nutrient balances) and of parameter sensitivity. It is important for future calibration developments to spatially account for hydrologic processes; improve model run time efficiency; include the impact of uncertainty in the conceptual model, model parameters, and measured variables used in calibration; and assist users in checking for model errors. When calibrating a physically based model like SWAT, it is important to remember that all model input parameters must be kept within a realistic uncertainty range and that no automatic procedure can substitute for actual physical knowledge of the watershed.
Article
A hilly watershed in Kopili River basin in Assam (India) was considered for assessment of hydropower potential using spatial tool (GIS) and hydrological model (SWAT2000). The available data related to topography, soil, land use, weather and discharge pertaining to the study watershed were used to characterize the watershed. The characterization was required for water resources hence hydropower assessment. The hydrology of the study watershed was simulated through the model. The prediction accuracy of the model was confirmed through three well known efficiency criteria viz., coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.70), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (E = 0.64) and Index of agreement (d = 0.91). A total of 107 sites on 9 streams could be identified as potential location for hydropower generation in the study watershed using the model outputs. Distributed power availability through micro units (<0.5 MW) has been the characteristic feature of the watershed. Estimated potential carbon emission reduction (CER) within the watershed might be up to 125 thousand t CO2, even 50% of the potential hydropower of the 1204 sq km watershed could be implemented. The result of the study is expected to boost the initiative for hydropower generation in the region considering the limitation of fossil fuels, increasing power demand and availability of untapped water resources.
Assessment of run-of-river hydropower potential and power supply planning in Nepal using hydro resources
  • I Bajracharya
Bajracharya, I., 2015. Assessment of run-of-river hydropower potential and power supply planning in Nepal using hydro resources. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Wien.
Guidelines for Study of Hydropower Projects
  • Doed
DOED, 2018. Guidelines for Study of Hydropower Projects. URL http://www.doed.gov.np/storage/listies/December2019/ guidelines-for-study-of-hydropower-projects-2018.pdf.
Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment
  • P Krause
  • D Boyle
  • F Bäse
Krause, P., Boyle, D., and Bäse, F., 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in geosciences, 5, 89-97.
Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version
  • S L Neitsch
  • J G Arnold
  • J R Kiniry
  • J R Williams
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R., 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Tech. rep., Texas Water Resources Institute.
Assessment of hydropower potential of Nepal. Water and Energy Commission Secretariat Kathmandu
WECS, 2019. Assessment of hydropower potential of Nepal. Water and Energy Commission Secretariat Kathmandu.