Preprint

The problem of coexistence of several non-Hermitian observables in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
To read the file of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

During the recent developments of quantum theory it has been clarified that the observable quantities (like energy or position) may be represented by operators (with real spectra) which are manifestly non-Hermitian. The mathematical consistency of the resulting models of stable quantum systems requires a reconstruction of an alternative, amended, physical inner product of states. We point out the less known fact that for more than one observable the task is not always feasible. The difficulty is re-analyzed and its elementary linear-algebraic interpretation and treatment are outlined.

No file available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the file of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
These reports contain an account of 2015’s meeting on noncommutative geometry. Noncommutative geometry has developed itself over the years to a completely new branch of mathematics shedding light on many other areas as number theory, differential geometry and operator algebras. A connection that was highlighted in particular in this meeting was the connection with the theory of II_1 -factors and geometric group theory.
Article
A quasi-Hermitian operator is an operator that is similar to its adjoint in some sense, via a metric operator, i.e., a strictly positive self-adjoint operator. Whereas those metric operators are in general assumed to be bounded, we analyze the structure generated by unbounded metric operators in a Hilbert space. It turns out that such operators generate a canonical lattice of Hilbert spaces, that is, the simplest case of a partial inner product space (PIP-space). We introduce several generalizations of the notion of similarity between operators, in particular, the notion of quasi-similarity, and we explore to what extend they preserve spectral properties. Then we apply some of the previous results to operators on a particular PIP-space, namely, a scale of Hilbert spaces generated by a metric operator. Finally, motivated by the recent developments of pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics, we reformulate the notion of pseudo-Hermitian operators in the preceding formalism.
Article
We introduce the notion of real structure in our spectral geometry. This notion is motivated by Atiyah’s KR‐theory and by Tomita’s involution J. It allows us to remove two unpleasant features of the ‘‘Connes–Lott’’ description of the standard model, namely, the use of bivector potentials and the asymmetry in the Poincaré duality and in the unimodularity condition.
  • C M Bender
C. M. Bender, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 (2007) 947.
  • A Mostafazadeh
A. Mostafazadeh, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 7 (2010) 1191.
  • F G Scholtz
  • H B Geyer
  • F J W Hahne
F. G. Scholtz, H. B. Geyer and F. J. W. Hahne, Ann. Phys. (NY) 213 (1992) 74.
  • Miloslav Znojil
Miloslav Znojil, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 441-456.
Unpublished (arXiv math-ph/0104012), reprinted in Rendiconti del Circ
M. Znojil, Conservation of pseudo-norm in PT symmetric quantum mechanics. Unpublished (arXiv math-ph/0104012), reprinted in Rendiconti del Circ. Mat. di Palermo, Ser. II, Suppl. 72 (2004), pp. 211 -218.
  • C M Bender
  • D C Brody
  • H F Jones
C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody and H. F. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 270401 and ibid. 92 (2004) 119902 (erratum).
  • B Bagchi
  • A Banerjee
  • E Caliceti
B. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, E. Caliceti et al., Int. J. of Modern Phys. A 20 (2005) 7107; B. Bagchi, A. Banerjee and A. Ganguly, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 022101.
  • T K Jana
  • P Roy
T. K. Jana and P. Roy, SIGMA 5 (2009) 083 (e-print overlay: arXiv:0908.1755).
  • B Bagchi
  • A Fring
B. Bagchi and A. Fring, SIGMA 5 (2009) 089, (e-print overlay: arXiv:0908.2341).
  • B Bagchi
  • A Fring
B. Bagchi and A. Fring, Phys. Let. A 371 (2009) 4307.
  • S Dey
  • A Fring
  • L Gouba
S. Dey, A. Fring and L. Gouba, J. Phys. 45 (2012) 385302;
  • S Dey
  • A Fring
S. Dey and A. Fring, Physical Review D 86, 064038 (2012);
  • S Dey
  • A Fring
S. Dey and A. Fring Acta Polytechnica 53 (2013) 268-276;
  • S Dey
  • A Fring
  • L Gouba
  • P Castro
S. Dey, A. Fring, L. Gouba, P. Castro, Phys. Rev. D87, 084033 (2013).
  • F J Dyson
F. J. Dyson, Phys Rev 102 (1956) 1217.
  • P Siegl
  • D Krejčiřík
P. Siegl and D. Krejčiřík, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 121702(R).
  • F Bagarello
  • M Znojil
F. Bagarello and M. Znojil, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 115311.
  • A Mostafazadeh
A. Mostafazadeh, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371 (2013) 20120050.
  • T Curtright
  • L Mezincescu
  • D Schuster
T. Curtright, L. Mezincescu and D. Schuster, J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 092108.
  • L C Biedenharn
L. C. Biedenharn, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, L873 (1989);
  • A J Macfarlane
A. J. Macfarlane, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 4581 (1989);
  • C.-P Su
  • H.-C Fu
C.-P. Su and H.-C. Fu, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, L983 (1989).
  • A Connes
  • J Lott
A. Connes and J. Lott, Nucl. Phys. 18B (Proc. Suppl.) (1991) 29.
The q-Deformed Harmonic Oscillator, the poster presented during the 4-th Jijel Theor
  • H Moulla
  • N Mebarki
  • I Leghrib
H. Moulla, N. Mebarki and I. Leghrib, The q-Deformed Harmonic Oscillator, the poster presented during the 4-th Jijel Theor. Physics School "Topics in Quantum Physics and Path Integrals" (September 25 -29, 2016).
Deformed Swanson model, the poster presented during the 4-th Jijel Theor
  • I Leghrib
  • N Mebarki
I. Leghrib and N. Mebarki, q-Deformed Swanson model, the poster presented during the 4-th Jijel Theor. Physics School "Topics in Quantum Physics and Path Integrals" (September 25 -29, 2016).
  • R Banerjee
  • B Chakraborty
  • S Ghosh
R. Banerjee, B. Chakraborty, S. Ghosh et al., Found. Phys. 39 (2009) 1297;
  • F G Scholtz
  • L Gouba
  • A Hafver
F. G. Scholtz, L. Gouba, A. Hafver et al., J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 175303;
  • V Galikova
  • S Kováčik
  • P Prešnajder
V. Galikova, S. Kováčik and P. Prešnajder, Acta Phys. Slovaca 65 (2015) 153;
  • Y Ch
  • S Devi
  • A K Prajapat
  • Mukhopadhyay
Y. Ch. Devi, S. Prajapat, A. K. Mukhopadhyay et al., J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015) 041707.
  • A Mostafazadeh
A. Mostafazadeh, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 10171.
  • M Znojil
  • H B Geyer
M. Znojil and H. B. Geyer, Phys. Lett. B 640 (2006) 52 and 649 (2007) 494 (erratum).