Preprint
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
To read the file of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

We investigate a quantum many-body system with particles moving on a circle and subject to two-body and three-body potentials. In this new class of models, that extrapolates from the celebrated Calogero-Sutherland model and a system with interactions among nearest and next-to-nearest neighbors, the interactions can be tuned as a function of range. We determine the exact ground state energy and wavefunction and obtain a part of the excitation spectrum.

No file available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the file of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The finite-time operation of a quantum heat engine that uses a single particle as a working medium generally increases the output power at the expense of inducing friction that lowers the cycle efficiency. We propose to scale up a quantum heat engine utilizing a many-particle working medium in combination with the use of shortcuts to adiabaticity to boost the nonadiabatic performance by eliminating quantum friction and reducing the cycle time. To this end, we first analyze the finite-time thermodynamics of a quantum Otto cycle implemented with a quantum fluid confined in a time-dependent harmonic trap. We show that nonadiabatic effects can be controlled and tailored to match the adiabatic performance using a variety of shortcuts to adiabaticity. As a result, the nonadiabatic dynamics of the scaled-up many-particle quantum heat engine exhibits no friction, and the cycle can be run at maximum efficiency with a tunable output power. We demonstrate our results with a working medium consisting of particles with inverse-square pairwise interactions that includes non-interacting and hard-core bosons as limiting cases.
Article
This invaluable book provides a broad introduction to the fascinating and beautiful subject of many-body quantum systems that can be solved exactly. The subject began with Bethe's famous solution of the one-dimensional Heisenberg magnet more than 70 years ago, soon after the invention of quantum mechanics. Since then, the diversity and scope of such systems have been steadily growing.Beautiful Models is self-contained and unified in presentation. It may be used as an advanced textbook by graduate students and even ambitious undergraduates in physics. It is also suitable for the non-experts in physics who wish to have an overview of some of the classic and fundamental models in the subject. The explanations in the book are detailed enough to capture the interest of the curious reader, and complete enough to provide the necessary background material needed to go further into the subject and explore the research literature.
Article
We show that the asymptotic Bethe ansatz gives the exact zero temperature values of all the integrals of motion for the classical one-dimensional system interacting by an inverse-sinh-squared pair potential, in the thermodynamic limit. It is remarkable that the asymptotic Bethe ansatz, using only the scattering data for finite numbers of particles in an unbounded volume, gives exact results for all density.
  • J Minahan
  • K Zarembo
J. Minahan and K. Zarembo, JHEP 0303:013, (2003).
  • B Sutherland
B. Sutherland, J. Math. Phys. 12, 246 (1971).
  • F D M Haldane
F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 937(1991).
  • R Caracciola
  • A Lerda
  • G R Zemba
R. Caracciola, A. Lerda and G.R. Zemba, Phys. Lett. B352, 304 (1995).
  • J Cardy
J. Cardy, Phys. Lett. B582 (2004) 121.
  • M V E Bergshoeff
M.V.E. Bergshoeff, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10, 3477 (1995).
  • V Marotta
  • A Sciarrino
V. Marotta and A. Sciarrino, Nucl. Phys. 476, 351 (1996).
  • M Cadoni
  • P Carta
  • D Klemm
M. Cadoni, P. Carta and D. Klemm, Phys. Lett. B503, 205 (2001).
  • Y.-S Wu
Y.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 923.
  • M V N Murthy
  • R Shankar
M.V.N. Murthy and R. Shankar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3331 (1994).
  • K Sogo
K. Sogo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, 2187 (1993).
  • G Gibbons
  • P Townsend
G. Gibbons and P. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B454, 187 (1999).
  • S R Jain
S. R. Jain, Czech J. Phys. 56, 1021 (2006).
  • F J Dyson
F.J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 3, 166 (1962).
  • J Jaramillo
  • M Beau
  • A Del Campa
J. Jaramillo, M. Beau and A. del Campa, arXiv:1510.04633 (2015).
  • A Campo
A. del Campo, New J. Phys. 18 015014 (2016).
  • F Calogero
F. Calogero, J. Math. Phys. 12 419 (1971).
  • S R Jain
  • A Khare
S.R. Jain and A. Khare, Phys. Lett. A262, 35 (1999).
  • S M Pittman
  • M Beau
  • M Olshanii
  • A Del Campo
S.M. Pittman, M. Beau, M. Olshanii and A. del Campo, arXiv:1606.00895 (2016)
  • G Auberson
  • S R Jain
  • A Khare
G. Auberson, S.R. Jain and A. Khare, J. Phys. A34, 695 (2001).
  • L Lapointe
  • L Vinet
L. Lapointe and L. Vinet, Commun. Math. Phys. 178, 425 (1996)
  • M Ezung
  • N Gurappa
  • A Khare
  • P K Panigrahi
M. Ezung, N. Gurappa, A. Khare and P.K.Panigrahi, Phys. Rev. B71, 125121 (2005).
  • T Kinoshita
  • T Wenger
  • D S Weiss
T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D.S. Weiss, Science 305, 1125 (2004).
  • G Auberson
  • S R Jain
  • A Khare
G. Auberson, S. R. Jain, and A. Khare, Phys. Lett. A267, 293 (2000).
  • S R Jain
  • B Gremaud
  • A Khare
S. R. Jain, B. Gremaud, and A. Khare, Phys. Rev. E66, 016216 (2002).